This disclosure generally relates to illumination of light modulation devices, and more specifically relates to light guides for providing large area illumination from localized light sources for use in privacy display devices.
Spatially multiplexed autostereoscopic displays typically align a parallax component such as a lenticular screen or parallax barrier with an array of images arranged as at least first and second sets of pixels on a spatial light modulator, for example an LCD. The parallax component directs light from each of the sets of pixels into different respective directions to provide first and second viewing windows in front of the display. An observer with an eye placed in the first viewing window can see a first image with light from the first set of pixels; and with an eye placed in the second viewing window can see a second image, with light from the second set of pixels.
Such displays have reduced spatial resolution compared to the native resolution of the spatial light modulator and further, the structure of the viewing windows is determined by the pixel aperture shape and parallax component imaging function. Gaps between the pixels, for example for electrodes, typically produce non-uniform viewing windows. Undesirably such displays exhibit image flicker as an observer moves laterally with respect to the display and so limit the viewing freedom of the display. Such flicker can be reduced by defocusing the optical elements; however such defocusing results in increased levels of image cross talk and increases visual strain for an observer. Such flicker can be reduced by adjusting the shape of the pixel aperture, however such changes can reduce display brightness and can comprise addressing electronics in the spatial light modulator.
Further spatially multiplexed displays provide repeating lobes of directional images, so that off-axis visibility is maintained and are not typically suitable for privacy display.
According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, there may be provided a directional display apparatus comprising: a directional backlight comprising a waveguide comprising first and second, opposed guide surfaces for guiding input light along the waveguide, and an array of light sources arranged to generate the input light at different input positions across the waveguide, wherein the first guide surface is arranged to guide light by total internal reflection, the second guide surface comprises a plurality of light extraction features arranged to deflect light guided through the waveguide out of the waveguide through the first guide surface as output light and intermediate regions between the light extraction features that are arranged to guide light along the waveguide, and the waveguide is arranged to direct the output light into optical windows in output directions that are distributed in a lateral direction in dependence on the input position of the input light; a transmissive spatial light modulator arranged to receive the output light from the first guide surface of the waveguide and to modulate it to display an image; and a control system capable of controlling the spatial light modulator and capable of selectively operating of light sources to direct light into corresponding optical windows, wherein stray light in the directional backlight is directed in output directions outside the optical windows corresponding to selectively operated light sources, the control system is arranged to control the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources in synchronization with each other so that: (a) the spatial light modulator displays a primary image while at least one primary light source is selectively operated to direct light into at least one primary optical window for viewing by a primary observer, and (b) in a temporally multiplexed manner with the display of the primary image, the spatial light modulator displays a secondary image while at least one light source other than the at least one primary light source is selectively operated to direct light into secondary optical windows outside the at least one primary optical window, the secondary image as perceived by a secondary observer outside the primary optical window obscuring the primary image that modulates the stray light directed outside the primary optical window.
Thus a display may provide a primary image to a first observer with high luminance and high contrast over a comfortable viewing range. A secondary observer outside the viewing range may observe a secondary image with lower luminance than the primary image, and further comprises reduced contrast, disruptive pattern or other obscuration effects. Advantageously, the desired primary image may difficult to perceive by the secondary observer, thus improving the security of use of the display in public environments. Further, reflections from the display surface may further obscure the image to the secondary observer. Such a display may be arranged to switch between a wide angle viewing mode and a privacy mode. Further such a display may achieve low power operation for extended time between battery charges. Very high luminance mode may be provided over a reduced angular range for substantially the same power consumption as wide angle mode operation. Further, such a display may be arranged to achieve autostereoscopic display operation.
Said at least one light source other than the at least one primary light source that may be selectively operated to direct light into secondary optical windows outside the at least one primary optical window may comprise plural light sources other than the at least one primary light source. Said plural light sources other than the at least one primary light source may be selectively operated to output light with differing luminous flux. The control system may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources in synchronization with each other so that: (a) while the spatial light modulator displays the primary image, at least one additional light source in addition to the at least one primary light source may be selectively operated to direct light into an additional optical window, and (b) while the spatial light modulator displays the secondary image, the plural light sources include the at least one additional light source and other light sources, the additional light source being operated to output light with higher luminous flux than the other light sources. The at least one additional light source may change in different temporal phases of operation. Advantageously the appearance of the display to an off-axis observer may comprise regions of differing luminance across the spatial light modulator that disrupts the appearance of the primary image. Such disruption may be achieved without altering the image content and may be time varying. Thus a primary observer may see the primary image with minimized visibility of residual secondary image.
The secondary image may comprise an inverted copy of the primary image arranged to at least partly cancel the primary image that modulates the stray light directed outside the primary optical window, as perceived by the primary observer.
Advantageously the perceived image by the secondary observer may have substantially reduced contrast in comparison to the primary image perceived by the primary observer.
The control system may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources so that the secondary image has the same luminance as the primary image that modulates the stray light directed outside the primary optical window. The inverted copy of the primary image may comprise a copy of the primary image inverted by an inversion function varies spatially across the image. The inversion function may vary spatially across the image in correspondence with a spatial variation of the luminance of the output windows.
The secondary image may comprise the inverted copy of the primary image superimposed by a disruptive pattern. The secondary image may comprise a disruptive pattern. The primary image may comprise an image for display to the primary observer superimposed by an inverted copy of the disruptive pattern arranged to at least partly cancel the disruptive pattern that modulates the stray light directed outside the secondary optical window, as perceived by the primary observer.
Advantageously the obscuration effect may combine reduced luminance, reduced contrast and disruptive image content that may be dependent on the primary image content to provide further obscuration in regions where the cancelling of the primary and secondary images are not complete due to angular variations of the contrast of the spatial light modulator.
The control system may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources in synchronization with each other so that the spatial light modulator displays a primary image and the secondary image in a temporally multiplexed manner in time slots of unequal length.
Advantageously the luminance of the primary image may be increased in comparison to arrangements in which the time slots are of equal length.
The spatial light modulator may comprise an array of pixels and the control system may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator to control the drive level of each pixel during the temporally multiplexed display of the primary and secondary taking into account the desired grey level of the pixel and the expected hysteresis of the pixel.
Advantageously leakage of secondary image into the primary image may be reduced, for example to reduce the appearance of disruptive patterns from the secondary image in the primary image for the primary observer.
The primary image may be a two dimensional image. The primary image may be a three dimensional image comprising a left eye image and a right eye image, and the control system may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator to display the primary image by (a1) controlling the spatial light modulator to display the left eye image and the right eye image in a temporally multiplexed manner, and (a2) in synchronization with the control of the spatial light modulator, controlling the array of light sources to selectively operate different primary light sources to direct light into at least one primary optical window for viewing by the left and right eyes of the primary observer, when the spatial light modulator displays the left eye image and the right eye image, respectively. The secondary image may be a two dimensional image.
Advantageously autostereoscopic operation may be achieved in a privacy mode with low visibility of the autostereoscopic image to a secondary observer.
The second guide surface may have a stepped shape comprising facets, that are said light extraction features, and the intermediate regions. The directional backlight may further comprise a rear reflector comprising a linear array of reflective facets arranged to reflect light from the light sources that is transmitted through the plurality of facets of the waveguide, back through the waveguide to exit through the first guide surface into said optical windows. The light extraction features may have positive optical power in the lateral direction.
Advantageously a high luminance, high efficiency and com pact backlight may be provided for a directional privacy display. By means of control of an array of light sources, such a backlight may achieve controllable modes of operation including low power, high luminance, autostereoscopic and privacy operation.
The waveguide may further comprise an input end, the array of light sources being arranged along the input end. The waveguide may further comprise a reflective end for reflecting input light back through the waveguide, the second guide surface being arranged to deflect light as output light through the first guide surface after reflection from the reflective end. The reflective end may have positive optical power in the lateral direction. The waveguide may further comprise a reflective end that is elongated in a lateral direction, the first and second guide surfaces extending from laterally extending edges of the reflective end, the waveguide further comprising side surfaces extending between the first and second guide surfaces, and wherein the light sources may include an array of light sources arranged along a side surface to provide said input light through that side surface, and the reflective end comprises first and second facets alternating with each other in the lateral direction, the first facets being reflective and forming reflective facets of a Fresnel reflector having positive optical power in the lateral direction, the second facets forming draft facets of the Fresnel reflector, the Fresnel reflector having an optical axis that is inclined towards the side surface in a direction in which the Fresnel reflector deflects input light from the array of light sources into the waveguide.
The directional display apparatus may further comprise a sensor system arranged to detect the position of the head of the primary observer, the control system being arranged to control the light sources in accordance with the detected position of the head of the observer.
Advantageously the freedom of movement for the primary viewer may be increased, and the range over which a secondary observer may attempt to see the primary image may be reduced.
The sensor system may be arranged to detect a secondary observer outside the primary optical window, and the control system may be arranged, in response to detecting the secondary observer, to perform said control of the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources in synchronization with each other so that the spatial light modulator displays the primary image and the secondary image in a temporally multiplexed manner, and, in response to not detecting the secondary observer, to control the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources so that the spatial light modulator displays the primary image while at least one primary light source is selectively operated to direct light into at least one primary optical window for viewing by a primary observer, without displaying the secondary image in a temporally multiplexed manner.
Advantageously the contrast of the primary image may be increased in arrangements when no secondary observer is detected. According to a second aspect of the present disclosure there may be provided a method of obscuring a primary image that modulates stray light directed outside the primary optical window in a directional display apparatus comprising: a directional backlight comprising a waveguide comprising first and second, opposed guide surfaces for guiding input light along the waveguide, and an array of light sources arranged to generate the input light at different input positions across the waveguide, wherein the first guide surface is arranged to guide light by total internal reflection, the second guide surface comprises a plurality of light extraction features arranged to deflect light guided through the waveguide out of the waveguide through the first guide surface as output light and intermediate regions between the light extraction features that are arranged to guide light along the waveguide, and the waveguide is arranged to direct the output light into optical windows in output directions that are distributed in a lateral direction in dependence on the input position of the input light so that selectively operation of light sources causes light to be directed into corresponding optical windows, wherein stray light in the directional backlight is directed in output directions outside the optical windows corresponding to selectively operated light sources;
and a transmissive spatial light modulator arranged to receive the output light from the first guide surface of the waveguide and to modulate it to display an image; the method comprising controlling the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources in synchronization with each other so that: (a) the spatial light modulator displays a primary image while at least one primary light source is selectively operated to direct light into at least one primary optical window for viewing by a primary observer, and (b) in a temporally multiplexed manner with the display of the primary image, the spatial light modulator displays a secondary image while at least one light source other than the at least one primary light source is selectively operated to direct light into secondary optical windows outside the at least one primary optical window, the secondary image as perceived by a secondary observer outside the primary optical window obscuring the primary image that modulates the stray light directed outside the primary optical window.
Embodiments of the present disclosure may be used in a variety of optical systems. The embodiment may include or work with a variety of projectors, projection systems, optical components, displays, microdisplays, computer systems, processors, self-contained projector systems, visual and/or audiovisual systems and electrical and/or optical devices. Aspects of the present disclosure may be used with practically any apparatus related to optical and electrical devices, optical systems, presentation systems or any apparatus that may contain any type of optical system. Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure may be employed in optical systems, devices used in visual and/or optical presentations, visual peripherals and so on and in a number of computing environments.
Before proceeding to the disclosed embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application or creation to the details of the particular arrangements shown, because the disclosure is capable of other embodiments. Moreover, aspects of the disclosure may be set forth in different combinations and arrangements to define embodiments unique in their own right. Also, the terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
Directional backlights offer control over the illumination emanating from substantially the entire output surface controlled typically through modulation of independent LED light sources arranged at the input aperture side of an optical waveguide. Controlling the emitted light directional distribution can achieve single person viewing for a security function, where the display can only be seen by a single viewer from a limited range of angles; high electrical efficiency, where illumination may be provided over a small angular directional distribution; alternating left and right eye viewing for time sequential stereoscopic and autostereoscopic display; and low cost.
These and other advantages and features of the present disclosure will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading this disclosure in its entirety.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example in the accompanying FIGURES, in which like reference numbers indicate similar parts, and in which:
Time multiplexed autostereoscopic displays can advantageously improve the spatial resolution of an autostereoscopic display by directing light from all of the pixels of a spatial light modulator to a first viewing window in a first time slot, and all of the pixels to a second viewing window in a second time slot. Thus an observer with eyes arranged to receive light in first and second viewing windows will see a full resolution image across the whole of the display over multiple time slots. Time multiplexed displays can advantageously achieve directional illumination by directing an illuminator array through a substantially transparent time multiplexed spatial light modulator using directional optical elements, wherein the directional optical elements substantially form an image of the illuminator array in the window plane.
The uniformity of the viewing windows may be advantageously independent of the arrangement of pixels in the spatial light modulator. Advantageously, such displays can provide observer tracking displays which have low flicker, with low levels of cross talk for a moving observer.
To achieve high uniformity in the window plane, it is desirable to provide an array of illumination elements that have a high spatial uniformity. The illuminator elements of the time sequential illumination system may be provided, for example, by pixels of a spatial light modulator with size approximately 100 micrometers in combination with a lens array. However, such pixels suffer from similar difficulties as for spatially multiplexed displays. Further, such devices may have low efficiency and higher cost, requiring additional display components.
High window plane uniformity can be conveniently achieved with macroscopic illuminators, for example, an array of LEDs in combination with homogenizing and diffusing optical elements that are typically of size 1 mm or greater. However, the increased size of the illuminator elements means that the size of the directional optical elements increases proportionately. For example, a 16 mm wide illuminator imaged to a 65 mm wide viewing window may require a 200 mm back working distance. Thus, the increased thickness of the optical elements can prevent useful application, for example, to mobile displays, or large area displays.
Addressing the aforementioned shortcomings, optical valves as described in commonly-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/300,293 advantageously can be arranged in combination with fast switching transmissive spatial light modulators to achieve time multiplexed autostereoscopic illumination in a thin package while providing high resolution images with flicker free observer tracking and low levels of cross talk. Described is a one dimensional array of viewing positions, or windows, that can display different images in a first, typically horizontal, direction, but contain the same images when moving in a second, typically vertical, direction.
Conventional non-imaging display backlights commonly employ optical waveguides and have edge illumination from light sources such as LEDs. However, it should be appreciated that there are many fundamental differences in the function, design, structure, and operation between such conventional non-imaging display backlights and the imaging directional backlights discussed in the present disclosure.
Generally, for example, in accordance with the present disclosure, imaging directional backlights are arranged to direct the illumination from multiple light sources through a display panel to respective multiple viewing windows in at least one axis. Each viewing window is substantially formed as an image in at least one axis of a light source by the imaging system of the imaging directional backlight. An imaging system may be formed between multiple light sources and the respective window images. In this manner, the light from each of the multiple light sources is substantially not visible for an observer's eye outside of the respective viewing window.
In contradistinction, conventional non-imaging backlights or light guiding plates (LGPs) are used for illumination of 2D displays. See, e.g., Kälil Käläntär et al., Backlight Unit With Double Surface Light Emission, J. Soc. Inf. Display, Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 379-387 (December 2004). Non-imaging backlights are typically arranged to direct the illumination from multiple light sources through a display panel into a substantially common viewing zone for each of the multiple light sources to achieve wide viewing angle and high display uniformity. Thus non-imaging backlights do not form viewing windows. In this manner, the light from each of the multiple light sources may be visible for an observer's eye at substantially all positions across the viewing zone. Such conventional non-imaging backlights may have some directionality, for example, to increase screen gain compared to Lambertian illumination, which may be provided by brightness enhancement films such as BEF™ from 3M. However, such directionality may be substantially the same for each of the respective light sources. Thus, for these reasons and others that should be apparent to persons of ordinary skill, conventional non-imaging backlights are different to imaging directional backlights. Edge lit non-imaging backlight illumination structures may be used in liquid crystal display systems such as those seen in 2D Laptops, Monitors and TVs. Light propagates from the edge of a lossy waveguide which may include sparse features; typically local indentations in the surface of the guide which cause light to be lost regardless of the propagation direction of the light.
As used herein, an optical valve is an optical structure that may be a type of light guiding structure or device referred to as, for example, a light valve, an optical valve directional backlight, and a valve directional backlight (“v-DBL”). In the present disclosure, optical valve is different to a spatial light modulator (even though spatial light modulators may be sometimes generally referred to as a “light valve” in the art). One example of an imaging directional backlight is an optical valve that may employ a folded optical system. Light may propagate substantially without loss in one direction through the optical valve, may be incident on an imaging reflector, and may counter-propagate such that the light may be extracted by reflection off tilted light extraction features, and directed to viewing windows as described in patent application Ser. No. 13/300,293, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
As used herein, examples of an imaging directional backlight include a stepped waveguide imaging directional backlight, a folded imaging directional backlight, or an optical valve.
Additionally, as used herein, a stepped waveguide imaging directional backlight may be an optical valve. A stepped waveguide is a waveguide for an imaging directional backlight including a waveguide for guiding light, further including a first light guiding surface; and a second light guiding surface, opposite the first light guiding surface, further including a plurality of light guiding features interspersed with a plurality of extraction features arranged as steps.
In operation, light may propagate within an exemplary optical valve in a first direction from an input side to a reflective side and may be transmitted substantially without loss. Light may be reflected at the reflective side and propagates in a second direction substantially opposite the first direction. As the light propagates in the second direction, the light may be incident on light extraction features, which are operable to redirect the light outside the optical valve. Stated differently, the optical valve generally allows light to propagate in the first direction and may allow light to be extracted while propagating in the second direction.
The optical valve may achieve time sequential directional illumination of large display areas. Additionally, optical elements may be employed that are thinner than the back working distance of the optical elements to direct light from macroscopic illuminators to a window plane. Such displays may use an array of light extraction features arranged to extract light counter propagating in a substantially parallel waveguide.
Thin imaging directional backlight implementations for use with LCDs have been proposed and demonstrated by 3M, for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,528,893; by Microsoft, for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,246 which may be referred to herein as a “wedge type directional backlight;” by RealD, for example U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/300,293 which may be referred to herein as an “optical valve” or “optical valve directional backlight,” all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present disclosure provides stepped waveguide imaging directional backlights in which light may reflect back and forth between the internal faces of, for example, a stepped waveguide which may include a first side and a first set of features. As the light travels along the length of the stepped waveguide, the light may not substantially change angle of incidence with respect to the first side and first set of surfaces and so may not reach the critical angle of the medium at these internal faces. Light extraction may be advantageously achieved by a second set of surfaces (the step “risers”) that are inclined to the first set of surfaces (the step “treads”). Note that the second set of surfaces may not be part of the light guiding operation of the stepped waveguide, but may be arranged to provide light extraction from the structure. By contrast, a wedge type imaging directional backlight may allow light to guide within a wedge profiled waveguide having continuous internal surfaces. The optical valve is thus not a wedge type imaging directional backlight.
Further, in
The waveguide 1 has first and second, opposed guide surfaces extending between the input end 2 and the reflective end 4 for guiding light forwards and back along the waveguide 1 by total internal reflection. The first guide surface is planar. The second guide surface has a plurality of light extraction features 12 facing the reflective end 4 and inclined to reflect at least some of the light guided back through the waveguide 1 from the reflective end in directions that break the total internal reflection at the first guide surface and allow output through the first guide surface, for example, upwards in
In this example, the light extraction features 12 are reflective facets, although other reflective features may be used. The light extraction features 12 do not guide light through the waveguide, whereas the intermediate regions of the second guide surface intermediate the light extraction features 12 guide light without extracting it. Those regions of the second guide surface are planar and may extend parallel to the first guide surface, or at a relatively low inclination. The light extraction features 12 extend laterally to those regions so that the second guide surface has a stepped shape including of the light extraction features 12 and intermediate regions. The light extraction features 12 are oriented to reflect light from the light sources, after reflection from the reflective end 4, through the first guide surface.
The light extraction features 12 are arranged to direct input light from different input positions in the lateral direction across the input end in different directions relative to the first guide surface that are dependent on the input position. As the illumination elements 15a-15n are arranged at different input positions, the light from respective illumination elements 15a-15n is reflected in those different directions. In this manner, each of the illumination elements 15a-15n directs light into a respective optical window in output directions distributed in the lateral direction in dependence on the input positions. The lateral direction across the input end 2 in which the input positions are distributed corresponds with regard to the output light to a lateral direction to the normal to the first guide surface. The lateral directions as defined at the input end 2 and with regard to the output light remain parallel in this embodiment where the deflections at the reflective end 4 and the first guide surface are generally orthogonal to the lateral direction. Under the control of a control system, the illuminator elements 15a-15n may be selectively operated to direct light into a selectable optical window. The optical windows may be used individually or in groups as viewing windows.
The reflective end 4 may have positive optical power in the lateral direction across the waveguide. In embodiments in which typically the reflective end 4 has positive optical power, the optical axis may be defined with reference to the shape of the reflective end 4, for example being a line that passes through the center of curvature of the reflective end 4 and coincides with the axis of reflective symmetry of the end 4 about the x-axis. In the case that the reflecting surface 4 is flat, the optical axis may be similarly defined with respect to other components having optical power, for example the light extraction features 12 if they are curved, or the Fresnel lens 62 described below. The optical axis 238 is typically coincident with the mechanical axis of the waveguide 1.
The SLM 48 extends across the waveguide is transmissive and modulates the light passing therethrough. Although the SLM 48 may be a liquid crystal display (LCD) but this is merely by way of example, and other spatial light modulators or displays may be used including LCOS, DLP devices, and so forth, as this illuminator may work in reflection. In this example, the SLM 48 is disposed across the first guide surface of the waveguide and modulates the light output through the first guide surface after reflection from the light extraction features 12.
The operation of a directional display device that may provide a one dimensional array of viewing windows is illustrated in front view in
Continuing the discussion of
In some embodiments with uncoated extraction features 12, reflection may be reduced when total internal reflection (TIR) fails, squeezing the xz angular profile and shifting off normal. However, in other embodiments having silver coated or metallized extraction features, the increased angular spread and central normal direction may be preserved. Continuing the description of the embodiment with silver coated extraction features, in the xz plane, light may exit the stepped waveguide 1 approximately collimated and may be directed off normal in proportion to the y-position of the respective illuminator element 15a-15n in illuminator array 15 from the input edge center. Having independent illuminator elements 15a-15n along the input edge 2 then enables light to exit from the entire first light directing side 6 and propagate at different external angles, as illustrated in
Illuminating a spatial light modulator (SLM) 48 such as a fast liquid crystal display (LCD) panel with such a device may achieve autostereoscopic 3D as shown in top view or yz-plane viewed from the illuminator array 15 end in
The reflective end 4 may have positive optical power in the lateral direction across the waveguide. In embodiments in which typically the reflective end 4 has positive optical power, the optical axis may be defined with reference to the shape of the reflective end 4, for example being a line that passes through the center of curvature of the reflective end 4 and coincides with the axis of reflective symmetry of the end 4 about the x-axis. In the case that the reflecting surface 4 is flat, the optical axis may be similarly defined with respect to other components having optical power, for example the light extraction features 12 if they are curved, or the Fresnel lens 62 described below. The optical axis 238 is typically coincident with the mechanical axis of the waveguide 1. The cylindrical reflecting surface at end 4 may typically be a spherical profile to optimize performance for on-axis and off-axis viewing positions. Other profiles may be used.
Continuing the discussion of
In another embodiment, the light extraction features 12 of each directional backlight may have positive optical power in a lateral direction across the waveguide.
In another embodiment, each directional backlight may include light extraction features 12 which may be facets of the second guide surface. The second guide surface may have regions alternating with the facets that may be arranged to direct light through the waveguide without substantially extracting it.
Advantageously, the arrangement illustrated in
There will now be described some waveguides, directional backlights and directional display devices that are based on and incorporate the structures of
The present embodiments refer to optical windows and viewing windows. Optical windows from a directional backlight may be formed by one light source of the array 15 of light sources. Optical windows from a parallax element and spatial light modulator may be formed by a first set of pixel columns, each with one respective aligned slit of the parallax element. Viewing windows may comprise multiple optical windows.
Thus a first guide surface may be arranged to guide light by total internal reflection and the second guide surface may be substantially planar and inclined at an angle to direct light in directions that break that total internal reflection for outputting light through the first guide surface, and the display device may further comprise a deflection element extending across the first guide surface of the waveguide for deflecting light towards the normal to the first guide surface.
The waveguide 1 is arranged as described above. The reflective end 4 converges the reflected light. A Fresnel lens 62 may be arranged to cooperate with reflective end 4 to achieve viewing windows 26 at a viewing plane 106 observed by an observer 99. A transmissive SLM 48 may be arranged to receive the light from the directional backlight. Further a diffuser 68 may be provided to substantially remove Moiré beating between the waveguide 1 and pixels of the SLM 48 as well as the Fresnel lens structure 62. Diffuser 68 may be an asymmetric diffuser arranged to provide diffusion in the vertical direction (x-axis) that is greater than the diffusion in the lateral direction (y-axis). Advantageously the display uniformity can be increased and the cross talk between adjacent viewing windows minimized
The control system may comprise a sensor system arranged to detect the position of the observer 99 relative to the display device 100. The sensor system comprises a position sensor 70, such as a camera, and a head position measurement system 72 that may for example comprise a computer vision image processing system. The control system may further comprise an illumination controller 74 and an image controller 76 that are both supplied with the detected position of the observer supplied from the head position measurement system 72.
The illumination controller 74 selectively operates the illuminator elements 15 to direct light to into the viewing windows 26 in cooperation with waveguide 1. The illumination controller 74 selects the illuminator elements 15 to be operated in dependence on the position of the observer detected by the head position measurement system 72, so that the viewing windows 26 into which light is directed are in positions corresponding to the left and right eyes of the observer 99. In this manner, the lateral output directionality of the waveguide 1 corresponds with the observer position.
The image controller 76 controls the SLM 48 to display images. To provide an autostereoscopic display, the image controller 76 and the illumination controller 74 may operate as follows. The image controller 76 controls the SLM 48 to display temporally multiplexed left and right eye images. The illumination controller 74 operate the light sources 15 to direct light into respective viewing windows in positions corresponding to the left and right eyes of an observer synchronously with the display of left and right eye images. In this manner, an autostereoscopic effect may be achieved using a time division multiplexing technique. Further or alternatively a low contrast privacy effect may be achieved using a time division multiplexing technique as will be described herein.
Spatial light modulator 48 may comprise a liquid crystal display that may comprise an input polarizer 210, TFT glass substrate 212, liquid crystal layer 214, color filter glass substrate 216 and output polarizer 218. Red pixels 220, green pixels 222 and blue pixels 224 may be arranged in an array at the liquid crystal layer 214. White, yellow, additional green or other color pixels (not shown) may be further arranged in the liquid crystal layer to increase transmission efficiency, color gamut or perceived image resolution.
Thus directional display apparatus 100 comprises a directional backlight comprising a waveguide 1 comprising first and second, opposed guide surfaces 6, 8 for guiding input light along the waveguide 1, and an array 15 of light sources 15a-n arranged to generate the input light at different input positions in a lateral direction across the waveguide 1. The first guide surface 6 may be arranged to guide light by total internal reflection, second guide surface 8 comprises a plurality of light extraction features 12 arranged to deflect light guided through the waveguide 1 out of the waveguide 1 through the first guide surface 8 as output light and intermediate regions 10 between the light extraction features 12 that are arranged to guide light along the waveguide 1, and the waveguide 1 is arranged to direct the output light into optical windows 26 in output directions that are distributed in a lateral direction in dependence on the input position of the input light. A transmissive spatial light modulator 48 is arranged to receive the output light from the first guide surface 6 of the waveguide and to modulate it to display an image.
In operation such displays may be arranged to provide high efficiency by directing light to viewing windows near an observer and not wasting light in directions that are not in the region of the observer's eyes. Further such displays can desirably provide high luminance for improved visibility in environments with high ambient illuminance.
The spatial light modulator may be a temporally multiplexed spatial modulator with a frame rate of 120 Hz for example, achieving images comprising primary and secondary images with a 60 Hz frame rate. Such a directional display device may achieve autostereoscopic display through temporal multiplexing as described above.
The first guide surface may be arranged to guide light by total internal reflection and the second guide surface may comprise a plurality of light extraction features oriented to direct light guided through the waveguide in directions allowing exit through the first guide surface as the output light and intermediate regions between the light extraction features that are arranged to guide light through the waveguide. The second guide surface may have a stepped shape comprising facets, that are said light extraction features, and the intermediate regions. The directional backlight may further comprise a rear reflector comprising a linear array of reflective facets arranged to reflect light from the light sources that is transmitted through the plurality of facets of the waveguide, back through the waveguide to exit through the first guide surface into said optical windows. The light extraction features may have positive optical power in the lateral direction.
The waveguide may further comprise an input end, the array of light sources being arranged along the input end. The waveguide may further comprise a reflective end for reflecting input light back through the waveguide, the second guide surface being arranged to deflect light as output light through the first guide surface after reflection from the reflective end. The reflective end may have positive optical power in the lateral direction.
Thus as described generally in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/167,203, entitled “Wide angle imaging directional backlights,” filed May 27, 2015, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, a directional display device may comprise a waveguide 1301 that further comprises a reflective end 1304 that is elongated in a lateral direction (y-axis), the first and second guide surfaces 6,8 extending from laterally extending edges of the reflective end 1304, the waveguide 1301 further comprising side surfaces 1322, 1324 extending between the first and second guide surfaces 6,8, and wherein the light sources include an array 1317 of light sources 1317a-n arranged along a side surface 1322 to provide said input light through that side surface 1322, and the reflective end 1304, comprises first and second facets 1327, 1329 alternating with each other in the lateral direction, the first facets 1327 being reflective and forming reflective facets of a Fresnel reflector having positive optical power in the lateral direction, the second facets 1329 forming draft facets of the Fresnel reflector, the Fresnel reflector 1304 having an optical axis 1287 that is inclined towards the side surface 1322 in a direction in which the Fresnel reflector 1304 deflects input light from the array of light sources 1317 into the waveguide 1301. Thus angle 1277 is non-zero. Similarly the second facets 1329 may be reflective and form reflective facets of a Fresnel reflector having positive optical power in the lateral direction, the Fresnel reflector 1304 having an optical axis 1289 that is inclined towards the side surface 1324 in a direction in which the Fresnel reflector 1304 deflects input light from the array of light sources 1319 into the waveguide 1301. Illustrative light ray 1363 from source 1317a may be arranged to provide optical window 1326a and light ray 1365 from source 1317b may be arranged to provide optical window 1326b. Other layers such as diffusers, prismatic reflection films, retarders and spatial light modulators may be arranged in series with the waveguide 1301 in a similar manner to that described for waveguide 1 in the arrangement of
Advantageously a thin backlight with low bezel size may be achieved. Such an arrangement has light sources that are not arranged on the long sides of the waveguide 1301 and thus may have small form factor. Further light sources 1317 and 1319 may be arranged with overlapping optical windows, and thus display luminance may be increased.
In the present embodiments, an optical window is formed by a single light source of the array 15 of light sources 15a-n. A viewing window is formed by a combination of optical windows.
Thus a control system 70, 72, 74, 76 shown in
Control of stray light luminance, or cross talk, is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/836,443, “Crosstalk suppression in a directional backlight,” filed Mar. 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.
Further
In the present embodiments typically the primary observer may be arranged within the primary viewing cone 250 and secondary observers may be arranged within secondary viewing cones 254. The position of a primary observer may be within the primary optical window that may be a primary viewing window provided by multiple optical windows 26. The secondary observer may be outside the primary optical window and may be within a secondary optical window that may be a secondary viewing window provided by multiple optical windows 26. For the purposes of the present embodiments, the primary optical window (which may a primary viewing window comprising multiple optical windows) may be defined as the width of the luminance distribution at which the intensity drops to less than 50% of the peak luminance. Typically the stray light may provide a relatively uniform luminance distribution, due to the substantially uniform distribution of light across the input side 2 that is reflected.
Advantageously the arrangements of
Thus the arrangement of
It may be desirable to provide further obscuration of the primary image to the secondary observer as will be described below. In the present embodiments, the arrangement of
It will be observed that the perceived image 283 in the second phase is substantially the inverse of the perceived image 282 in the first phase. As will be described below, the images combine to achieve a perceived secondary image with very low contrast. Advantageously a high degree of obscuration of the primary image to a secondary observer in the secondary viewing windows 241 may be provided due to contrast reduction.
The control system is arranged to control the spatial light modulator 48 and the array of light sources 15a-n in synchronization with each other so that: (a) the spatial light modulator 48 displays a primary image 261 while at least one primary light source 264 is selectively operated to direct light into at least one primary optical window 247 for viewing by a primary observer 300, and (b) in a temporally multiplexed manner with the display of the primary image 261, the spatial light modulator 48 displays a secondary image 263 while at least one light source 265 other than the at least one primary light source 264 is selectively operated to direct light into secondary optical windows 241 outside the at least one primary optical window 247
Advantageously obscuration may be achieved by contrast reduction for the secondary image.
Otherwise stated there may be provided a method of obscuring a primary image that modulates stray light directed outside the primary optical window in a directional display apparatus comprising a directional backlight, wherein stray light in the directional backlight is directed in output directions outside the optical windows corresponding to selectively operated light sources; and a transmissive spatial light modulator arranged to receive the output light from the first guide surface of the waveguide and to modulate it to display an image. The method may comprise controlling the spatial light modulator and the array of light sources in synchronization with each other so that: (a) the spatial light modulator displays a primary image while at least one primary light source is selectively operated to direct light into at least one primary optical window for viewing by a primary observer, and (b) in a temporally multiplexed manner with the display of the primary image, the spatial light modulator displays a secondary image while light sources other than the at least one primary light source are selectively operated to direct light into secondary optical windows outside the at least one primary optical window, the secondary image as perceived by a secondary observer outside the primary optical window obscuring the primary image that modulates the stray light directed outside the primary optical window.
The primary image may be a two dimensional image as described above. It may be desirable to provide a privacy mode of operation for a three dimensional image.
In one exemplary embodiment, in a first phase of operation, a left eye primary image may be provided in synchronization with a left eye primary optical window with angular luminance distribution 297. In a second phase of operation a right eye primary image may be in synchronization with a right eye primary optical window with angular luminance distribution 298.
In a third phase of operation a secondary image may be provided in synchronization with a secondary at least one optical window outside the at least one primary optical window and shown by distribution 294. The secondary image may be a two dimensional image. The transmittance of the secondary image may be arranged on a pixel-pixel basis by 1−a(L+R) where a is a constant, L is the left pixel transmittance and R is the right pixel transmittance and may be arranged to provide obscuration of the resultant primary autostereoscopic image to a secondary observer 302 outside the primary left and right optical windows.
Thus the primary image may be a three dimensional image comprising a left eye image and a right eye image. The control system 70, 72, 74, 76 may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator 48 to display the primary image by (a1) controlling the spatial light modulator 48 to display the left eye image and the right eye image in a temporally multiplexed manner, and (a2) in synchronization with the control of the spatial light modulator 48, controlling the array 15 of light sources 15a-n to selectively operate different primary light sources 264 to direct light into at least one primary optical window for viewing by the left and right eyes of the primary observer 300, when the spatial light modulator 48 displays the left eye image and the right eye image, respectively.
Advantageously an autostereoscopic display may be provided that can achieve autostereoscopic 3D operation for a primary observer and obscuration of the 3D image for a secondary observer outside the primary optical windows 297, 298. Further, three phases of operation may be employed to achieve the privacy function as the left and right eye images may be obscured in substantially a single phase.
It may be desirable to provide control of viewing freedom for the primary observer.
The directional display apparatus may further comprise a sensor system 70 arranged to detect the position of the head of the primary observer 300, the control system being arranged to control the light sources 15a-n in accordance with the detected position of the head of the observer 300. As shown in
It may be desirable to increase the contrast of a perceived primary image for the primary observer 300 when no secondary observer 302 is observing the display. Known face detectors and trackers may be arranged to detect the presence or not of secondary observers.
It may be desirable to further improve the level of obscuration by increasing the accuracy of inverted secondary image 263.
In an illustrative embodiment in a first step 412 a primary image grey level is inputted. In a second step 414 the primary image pixel drive level is calculated and used to drive the respective pixel of the primary image in the first phase as shown in the third step 416. In a fourth step 406 the desired inverted grey scale level is calculated and in a fifth step 408 the appropriate inverted drive level is calculated, further using the data of the input grey level and the mapping function such as shown in
Advantageously the obscuration of the primary image may be enhanced by providing reduced contrast of the perceived secondary image 287.
In operation, it may not always be possible to provide perfect removal of residual image contrast in the perceived secondary image 287, for example due to the finite cone angle subtended by the area of the display or to compensate for a variety of secondary observer positions. It may be desirable to provide further obscuration of the primary image to the secondary observer.
Advantageously obscuration of the primary image to the secondary observer 302 may be improved.
It may be desirable to minimize the visibility of the disruptive pattern in the perceived primary image 285.
It may be desirable to synchronize timing of light source 15a-n temporal illumination patterns with spatial light modulator 48 addressing to optimize display luminance and minimize cross talk between primary and secondary images, thus achieving improved image obscuration for a secondary observer.
The arrangements of
It would be desirable to provide further arrangements to provide disruptive patterns to the secondary image that may vary with time. Such time varying patterns can be achieved by updating the disruptive secondary image pattern of
In a further privacy mode of operation, such non-uniformities can be used to provide further disruptive images to a secondary observer as will be described below.
Group 720 of primary light sources 730 and groups 722, 724 of secondary light sources 732, 734 are provided, and this is an example in which there are plural primary light sources 730 and plural secondary light sources 732, 734.
The primary light sources may have equal flux. Alternatively the primary light sources 730 may have a flux distribution that varies with position to achieve a shaping of the optical window profile. Such shaping may improve perceived image spatial uniformity for an observer position approaching the edge of the primary optical window.
Further, secondary light sources 732 (in general at least one secondary light source 732) may be illuminated in the first phase of operation when the primary image is displayed in addition to the primary light sources 730, but while other secondary light sources 734 are not illuminated. Such additional secondary light sources 732 provide spatially non-uniform illumination for off-axis viewing positions as described for
Thus, in operation, the control system may be arranged to control the spatial light modulator 48 and the array 15 of light sources in synchronization with each as follows.
In a first phase of operation (top left in
In a second phase of operation, (top right in
However, in the second phase, the additional light sources 732 may be operated to output light with a higher luminous flux than the other secondary light sources 734 to provide some further compensation of the privacy appearance for the illumination of the additional optical windows in the first phase, however not necessarily providing image cancellation. Thus for a secondary observer, an image with different luminance levels across the display area may be seen, advantageously achieving a disruptive image pattern.
The first and second phase may repeat in a temporally multiplexed manner, in which case the phases illustrated in the bottom right and bottom left of
Alternatively, as illustrated in
The separation of the first and second phases to the third and fourth phases may be increased, thus controlling the temporal and spatial frequency of the secondary image disruption. Advantageously enhanced image disruption can be achieved without changing the image content provided to the spatial light modulator. Further the disruptive pattern appearance can change with viewer position due to the aberrational spatial non-uniformities having an angular dependence. Additional disruptive patterns described in
It would be desirable to reduce the levels of stray light in stepped waveguides to achieve improved privacy operation. Such improvement may be desirable for displays which comprise a single primary image, as well as time multiplexed displays with primary and secondary images as described elsewhere herein.
In operation, light rays 502, 504 are directed to reflective end 4 and imaged to optical window 26a (not shown).
Wedge type waveguides 1104 illustrated in
Light distribution 517 in outer regions 512, 514 undesirably degrades privacy performance for displays which comprise a single primary image, as well as time multiplexed displays with primary and secondary images as described elsewhere herein.
Region 535 between lines 531, 533 is illuminated by light source 15. Advantageously void A, 530 may be filled in a controllable manner by adjustment of the flux from the light sources 17, for a wide range of viewing positions. Further the angular illumination profile of the output windows may be controlled to provide a wide angle mode of similar or better performance compared to conventional waveguides 1.
Such side light sources 17, 19 may be operated in wide angle mode of operation only, and may not be operated in privacy operation. Alternatively such side sources may provide some secondary light sources to improve correction of privacy performance in regions that would otherwise be void regions.
Void regions of similar origin are provided by the side illuminated waveguide of
It would thus be desirable to correct for spatial non-uniformities in private image appearance for off-axis viewing positions.
It would be desirable to increase the spatial uniformity of image cancellation in a privacy display with primary and secondary image phases.
Advantageously, visibility of the primary image for secondary observers can be further reduced for regions across the observed image, improving overall privacy performance.
It would further be desirable to correct for angular variations in spatial distribution of luminance in the optical windows. Such variation can be provided by flux distributions created directly by imaging of the light sources, or can be created by stray light reflected from the input side, as illustrated for example in
It would be desirable to improve spatial uniformity of the privacy performance in displays that do not use head tracking capability.
As shown in
Advantageously the input surface and light source arrays may be modified to provide efficient illumination of the primary optical window and reduced visibility of stray light for privacy viewing positions.
As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately” provide an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding term and/or relativity between items. Such an industry-accepted tolerance ranges from zero percent to ten percent and corresponds to, but is not limited to, component values, angles, et cetera. Such relativity between items ranges between approximately zero percent to ten percent.
While various embodiments in accordance with the principles disclosed herein have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of this disclosure should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with any claims and their equivalents issuing from this disclosure. Furthermore, the above advantages and features are provided in described embodiments, but shall not limit the application of such issued claims to processes and structures accomplishing any or all of the above advantages.
Additionally, the section headings herein are provided for consistency with the suggestions under 37 CFR 1.77 or otherwise to provide organizational cues. These headings shall not limit or characterize the embodiment(s) set out in any claims that may issue from this disclosure. Specifically and by way of example, although the headings refer to a “Technical Field,” the claims should not be limited by the language chosen under this heading to describe the so-called field. Further, a description of a technology in the “Background” is not to be construed as an admission that certain technology is prior art to any embodiment(s) in this disclosure. Neither is the “Summary” to be considered as a characterization of the embodiment(s) set forth in issued claims. Furthermore, any reference in this disclosure to “invention” in the singular should not be used to argue that there is only a single point of novelty in this disclosure. Multiple embodiments may be set forth according to the limitations of the multiple claims issuing from this disclosure, and such claims accordingly define the embodiment(s), and their equivalents, that are protected thereby. In all instances, the scope of such claims shall be considered on their own merits in light of this disclosure, but should not be constrained by the headings set forth herein.
This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/300,293, “Directional flat illuminators,” filed Nov. 18, 2011, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/836,443, “Crosstalk suppression in a directional backlight,” filed Mar. 15, 2013, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/186,862, “Directional backlight,” filed Feb. 21, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/167,203, entitled “Wide angle imaging directional backlights,” filed May 27, 2015, U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 62/167,185, entitled “Wide angle imaging directional backlights,” filed May 27, 2015, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. Additionally, this application is related to and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/017,337, entitled “Directional privacy display,” filed Jun. 26, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1128979 | Hess | Feb 1915 | A |
1970311 | Ives | Aug 1934 | A |
2133121 | Stearns | Oct 1938 | A |
2247969 | Lemuel | Jul 1941 | A |
2480178 | Zinberg | Aug 1949 | A |
2810905 | Barlow | Oct 1957 | A |
3409351 | Winnek | Nov 1968 | A |
3715154 | Bestenreiner | Feb 1973 | A |
4057323 | Ward | Nov 1977 | A |
4528617 | Blackington | Jul 1985 | A |
4542958 | Young | Sep 1985 | A |
4804253 | Stewart | Feb 1989 | A |
4807978 | Grinberg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4829365 | Eichenlaub | May 1989 | A |
4914553 | Hamada et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5278608 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5347644 | Sedlmayr | Sep 1994 | A |
5349419 | Taguchi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5459592 | Shibatani et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466926 | Sasano et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5510831 | Mayhew | Apr 1996 | A |
5528720 | Winston et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5581402 | Taylor | Dec 1996 | A |
5588526 | Fantone et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5697006 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703667 | Ochiai | Dec 1997 | A |
5727107 | Umemoto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5771066 | Barnea | Jun 1998 | A |
5796451 | Kim | Aug 1998 | A |
5808792 | Woodgate et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5850580 | Taguchi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5875055 | Morishima et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5896225 | Chikazawa | Apr 1999 | A |
5903388 | Sedlmayr | May 1999 | A |
5933276 | Magee | Aug 1999 | A |
5956001 | Sumida et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959664 | Woodgate | Sep 1999 | A |
5959702 | Goodman | Sep 1999 | A |
5969850 | Harrold et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971559 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008484 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014164 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023315 | Harrold et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044196 | Winston et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6055013 | Woodgate et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061179 | Inoguchi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061489 | Ezra et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064424 | Berkel et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075557 | Holliman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6094216 | Taniguchi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108059 | Yang | Aug 2000 | A |
6118584 | Berkel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128054 | Schwarzenberger | Oct 2000 | A |
6144118 | Cahill et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6172723 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199995 | Umemoto et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219113 | Takahara | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224214 | Martin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232592 | Sugiyama | May 2001 | B1 |
6256447 | Laine | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262786 | Perlo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295109 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302541 | Grossmann | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305813 | Lekson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335999 | Winston et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6373637 | Gulick et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377295 | Woodgate et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6422713 | Fohl et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6456340 | Margulis | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464365 | Gunn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476850 | Erbey | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481849 | Martin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6654156 | Crossland et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6663254 | Ohsumi | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6724452 | Takeda et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731355 | Miyashita | May 2004 | B2 |
6736512 | Balogh | May 2004 | B2 |
6801243 | Berkel | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816158 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6825985 | Brown et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6847354 | Vranish | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847488 | Travis | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859240 | Brown et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6867828 | Taira et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6870671 | Travis | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6883919 | Travis | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7052168 | Epstein et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7058252 | Woodgate et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7073933 | Gotoh et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7091931 | Yoon | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7101048 | Travis | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7136031 | Lee et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7215391 | Kuan et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7215415 | Maehara et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7215475 | Woodgate et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7239293 | Perlin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7365908 | Dolgoff | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375886 | Lipton et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7410286 | Travis | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430358 | Qi et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7492346 | Manabe et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7528893 | Schultz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7545429 | Travis | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7587117 | Winston et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7614777 | Koganezawa et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7660047 | Travis et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7750981 | Shestak et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7750982 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771102 | Iwasaki | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7944428 | Travis | May 2011 | B2 |
7970246 | Travis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7976208 | Travis | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8016475 | Travis | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8216405 | Emerton et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8223296 | Lee et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8251562 | Kuramitsu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8325295 | Sugita et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8354806 | Travis et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8477261 | Travis et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8502253 | Min | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8534901 | Panagotacos et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556491 | Lee | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8651725 | Ie et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8714804 | Kim et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8752995 | Park | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9197884 | Lee et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9350980 | Robinson et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
20010001566 | Moseley et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010050686 | Allen | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020018299 | Daniell | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020113246 | Nagai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020113866 | Taniguchi et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030046839 | Oda et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030117790 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133191 | Morita et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137738 | Ozawa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137821 | Gotoh et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040008877 | Leppard et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021809 | Sumiyoshi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040042233 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040046709 | Yoshino | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040105264 | Spero | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108971 | Waldern et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109303 | Olczak | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135741 | Tomisawa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170011 | Kim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040263968 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263969 | Lipton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007753 | Hees et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050094295 | Yamashita et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110980 | Maehara et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050135116 | Epstein et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050174768 | Conner | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050180167 | Hoelen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190345 | Dubin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050237488 | Yamasaki et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254127 | Evans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264717 | Chien et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274956 | Bhat | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050276071 | Sasagawa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280637 | Ikeda et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060012845 | Edwards | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060056166 | Yeo et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060114664 | Sakata et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132423 | Travis | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060139447 | Unkrich | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060158729 | Vissenberg et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176912 | Anikitchev | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203200 | Koide | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215129 | Alasaarela et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221642 | Daiku | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227427 | Dolgoff | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244918 | Cossairt et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060250580 | Silverstein et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060262376 | Mather et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269213 | Hwang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284974 | Lipton et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291053 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060291243 | Niioka et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008406 | Shestak et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013624 | Bourhill | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025680 | Winston et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035706 | Margulis | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035829 | Woodgate et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035964 | Olczak | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070081110 | Lee | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085105 | Beeson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070109401 | Lipton et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115551 | Spilman et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115552 | Robinson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121047 | Chung | May 2007 | A1 |
20070153160 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183466 | Son et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070188667 | Schwerdtner | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189701 | Chakmakjian et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223252 | Lee et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080079662 | Saishu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084519 | Brigham et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086289 | Brott | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080128728 | Nemchuk et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080225205 | Travis | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080259012 | Fergason | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291359 | Miyashita | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297431 | Yuuki et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080297459 | Sugimoto et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080304282 | Mi et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080316768 | Travis | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090014700 | Metcalf et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016057 | Rinko | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090040426 | Mather et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067156 | Bonnett et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090135623 | Kunimochi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140656 | Kohashikawa et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160757 | Robinson | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090167651 | Benitez et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090174700 | Daiku | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190072 | Nagata et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090190079 | Saitoh | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090225380 | Schwerdtner et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090278936 | Pastoor et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090290203 | Schwerdtner | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100034987 | Fujii et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100040280 | McKnight | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053771 | Travis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100091093 | Robinson | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091254 | Travis et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100165598 | Chen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100177387 | Travis et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182542 | Nakamoto et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188438 | Kang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100188602 | Feng | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100214135 | Bathiche et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220260 | Sugita et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231498 | Large et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100277575 | Ismael et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100278480 | Vasylyev | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100289870 | Leister | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295920 | McGowan | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295930 | Ezhov | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300608 | Emerton et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100302135 | Larson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100309296 | Harrold et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100321953 | Coleman et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110013417 | Saccomanno et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019112 | Dolgoff | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110032483 | Hruska et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110032724 | Kinoshita | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043142 | Travis et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043501 | Daniel | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044056 | Travis et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110044579 | Travis et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051237 | Hasegawa et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110090959 | Wiegand | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110187293 | Travis | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110187635 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110188120 | Tabirian et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216266 | Travis | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221998 | Adachi et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228183 | Hamagishi | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110235359 | Liu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242150 | Song et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242277 | Do et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110242298 | Bathiche et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110255303 | Nichol et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110285927 | Schultz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292321 | Travis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310232 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120002136 | Nagata et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120002295 | Dobschal et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120008067 | Mun et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120013720 | Kadowaki et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120062991 | Mich et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063166 | Panagotacos et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075285 | Oyagi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120081920 | Ie et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120086776 | Lo | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120106193 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127573 | Robinson et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120154450 | Aho et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120162966 | Kim et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120169838 | Sekine | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120206050 | Spero | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236484 | Miyake | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243204 | Robinson | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120243261 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120293721 | Ueyama | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120299913 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120314145 | Robinson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130101253 | Popovich et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107340 | Wong et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130127861 | Gollier | May 2013 | A1 |
20130135588 | Popovich et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130156265 | Hennessy | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130169701 | Whitehead et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130294684 | Lipton et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307831 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130307946 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308185 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130308339 | Woodgate et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321599 | Harrold et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130328866 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130335821 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140009508 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140022619 | Woodgate et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036361 | Woodgate et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140043323 | Sumi | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140126238 | Kao et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140240828 | Robinson et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140340728 | Taheri | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140368602 | Woodgate et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150138059 | Large | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1142869 | Feb 1997 | CN |
1377453 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1454329 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1466005 | Jan 2004 | CN |
1487332 | Apr 2004 | CN |
1696788 | Nov 2005 | CN |
1823292 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1826553 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1866112 | Nov 2006 | CN |
2872404 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1307481 | Mar 2007 | CN |
101029975 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101049028 | Oct 2007 | CN |
200983052 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101114080 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101142823 | Mar 2008 | CN |
100449353 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101364004 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101598863 | Dec 2009 | CN |
100591141 | Feb 2010 | CN |
101660689 | Mar 2010 | CN |
102147079 | Aug 2011 | CN |
202486493 | Oct 2012 | CN |
1910399 | May 2013 | CN |
103238090 | Aug 2013 | CN |
0653891 | May 1995 | EP |
0721131 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0830984 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0833183 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0860729 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0939273 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0656555 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2003394 | Dec 2008 | EP |
1394593 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2451180 | May 2012 | EP |
1634119 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2405542 | Feb 2005 | GB |
2426352 | Nov 2006 | GB |
H08211334 | Aug 1996 | JP |
H08237691 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H08254617 | Oct 1996 | JP |
H08070475 | Dec 1996 | JP |
H08340556 | Dec 1996 | JP |
2000048618 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000200049 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001093321 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001281456 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002049004 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2003215349 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003215705 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004319364 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005116266 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005135844 | May 2005 | JP |
2005183030 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2005259361 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006004877 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006031941 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006310269 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007171500 | Jul 2007 | JP |
3968742 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2007273288 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007286652 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008204874 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2010160527 | Jul 2010 | JP |
20110216281 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2013015619 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013502693 | Jan 2013 | JP |
2013540083 | Oct 2013 | JP |
20030064258 | Jul 2003 | KR |
20090932304 | Dec 2009 | KR |
20110006773 | Jan 2011 | KR |
20110017918 | Feb 2011 | KR |
20110067534 | Jun 2011 | KR |
20120048301 | May 2012 | KR |
20120049890 | May 2012 | KR |
20130002646 | Jan 2013 | KR |
20140139730 | Dec 2014 | KR |
200528780 | Sep 2005 | TW |
1994006249 | Apr 1994 | WO |
1995020811 | Aug 1995 | WO |
1995027915 | Oct 1995 | WO |
1998021620 | May 1998 | WO |
1999011074 | Mar 1999 | WO |
2001027528 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2001061241 | Aug 2001 | WO |
2001079923 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2005071449 | Aug 2005 | WO |
2011020962 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011022342 | Feb 2011 | WO |
2011068907 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011149739 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012158574 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3M™ ePrivacy Filter software professional version; http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/3M-ePrivacy-Filter-software-professional-version/3239412.aspx?cm_mmc=ShoppingFeeds-_-ChannelIntelligence-_-Software-_-3239412_3MT%20ePrivacy%20Filter%20software%20professional%20version_3MF-EPFPRO&cpncode=37-7582919&srccode=cii_10191459#PO; Copyright 2007-2016. |
AU-2011329639 Australia Patent Examination Report No. 1 dated Mar. 6, 2014. |
AU-2013262869 Australian Office Action of Australian Patent Office dated Feb. 22, 2016. |
AU-2015258258 Australian Office Action of Australian Patent Office dated Jun. 9, 2016. |
Bahadur, “Liquid crystals applications and uses,” World Scientific, vol. 1, pp. 178 (1990). |
CA-2817044 Canadian office action dated Jul. 14, 2016. |
CN-201180065590.0 Office first action dated Dec. 31, 2014. |
CN-201180065590.0 Office second action dated Oct. 21, 2015. |
CN-201180065590.0 Office Third action dated Jun. 6, 2016. |
CN-201280034488.9 2d Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China dated Mar. 22, 2016. |
CN-201280034488.9 1st Office Action from the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China dated Jun. 11, 2015. |
CN-201380026045.X Chinese First Office Action of Chinese Patent Office dated Aug. 29, 2016. |
CN-201380026046.4 Chinese 1st Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China dated Oct. 24, 2016. |
CN-201380026047.9 Chinese 1st Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. dated Dec. 18, 2015. |
CN-201380026047.9 Chinese 2d Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. dated Jul. 12, 2016. |
CN-201380026050.0 Chinese 1st Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. dated Jun. 3, 2016. |
CN-201380026058.7 Chinese 1st Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China dated Nov. 2, 2016. |
CN-201380026059.1 Chinese 1st Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
CN-201380026076.5 Office first action dated May 11, 2016. |
CN-201380049451.8 Chinese Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. dated Apr. 5, 2016. |
CN-201380063047.6 Chinese Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. China dated Oct. 9, 2016. |
CN-201380063055.0 Chinese 1st Office Action of the State Intellectual Property Office of P.R. dated Jun. 23, 2016. |
CN-201480023023.2 Office action dated Aug. 12, 2016. |
EP-07864751.8 European Search Report dated Jun. 1, 2012. |
EP-07864751.8 Supplementary European Search Report dated May 29, 2015. |
EP-09817048.3 European Search Report dated Apr. 29, 2016. |
EP-11842021.5 Office Action dated Dec. 17, 2014. |
EP-11842021.5 Office Action dated Oct. 2, 2015. |
EP-11842021.5 Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2016. |
EP-13758536.0 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Feb. 4, 2016. |
EP-13790013.0 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Jan. 26, 2016. |
EP-13790141.9 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Feb. 11, 2016. |
EP-13790195.5 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Mar. 2, 2016. |
EP-13790267.2 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Feb. 25, 2016. |
EP-13790274.8 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Feb. 8, 2016. |
EP-13790775.4 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Oct. 9, 2015. |
EP-13790775.4 Office Action dated Aug. 29, 2016. |
EP-13790809.1 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Feb. 16, 2016. |
EP-13790942.0 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated May 23, 2016. |
EP-13791332.3 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Feb. 1, 2016. |
EP-13791437.0 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Oct. 14, 2015. |
EP-13791437.0 European first office action dated Aug. 30, 2016. |
EP-13822472.0 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Mar. 2, 2016. |
EP-13843659.7 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated May 10, 2016. |
EP-13844510.1 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated May 13, 2016. |
EP-13865893.5 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Oct. 6, 2016. |
EP-14754859.8 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Oct. 14, 2016. |
EP-16150248.9 European Extended Search Report of European Patent Office dated Jun. 16, 2016. |
Ian Sexton et al: “Stereoscopic and autostereoscopic display-systems”,—IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, May 1, 1999 (May 1, 1999 ), pp. 85-99, XP055305471, Retrieved from the Internet: RL:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/79/16655/00768575.pdf [retrieved on Sep. 26, 2016]. |
JP-2009538527 Reasons for rejection dated Jul. 17, 2012 with translation. |
Robinson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/098,084 entitled “Wide angle imaging directional backlights” filed Apr. 13, 2016. |
Robinson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/165,960 entitled “Wide Angle Imaging Directional Backlights” filed May 26, 2016. |
Robinson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/290,543 entitled “Wide angle imaging directional backlights” filed Oct. 11, 2016. |
Robinson, U.S. Appl. No. 13/300,293 entitled “Directional flat illuminators” filed Nov. 18, 2011. |
RU-2013122560 First office action dated Jan. 1, 2014. |
RU-2013122560 Second office action dated Apr. 10, 2015. |
Tabiryan et al., “The Promise of Diffractive Waveplates,” Optics and Photonics News, vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 40-45 (Mar. 2010). |
Travis, et al. “Backlight for view-sequential autostereo 3D”, Microsoft E&DD Applied Sciences, (date unknown), 25 pages. |
Travis, et al. “Collimated light from a waveguide for a display,” Optics Express, vol. 17, No. 22, pp. 19714-19719 (2009). |
Williams S P et al., “New Computational Control Techniques and Increased Understanding for Stereo 3-D Displays”, Proceedings of SPIE, SPIE, US, vol. 1256, Jan. 1, 1990, XP000565512, p. 75, 77, 79. |
International search report and written opinion of international searching authority in co-pending PCT/US2015/038024. |
JP-200980150139.1 1st Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2014. |
JP-200980150139.1 2d Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2015. |
JP-2013540083 Notice of reasons for rejection dated Jun. 30, 2015. |
JP-2013540083 Notice of reasons for rejection with translation dated Jun. 21, 2016. |
Kalantar, et al. “Backlight Unit With Double Surface Light Emission,” J. Soc. Inf. Display, vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 379-387 (Dec. 2004). |
KR-20117010839 1st Office action (translated) dated Aug. 28, 2015. |
KR-20117010839 2d Office action (translated) dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
KR-20137015775 Office action (translated) dated Oct. 18, 2016. |
Languy et al., “Performance comparison of four kinds of flat nonimaging Fresnel lenses made of polycarbonates and polymethyl methacrylate for concentrated photovoltaics”, Optics Letters, 36, pp. 2743-2745. |
Lipton, “Stereographics: Developers' Handbook”, Stereographic Developers Handbook, Jan. 1, 1997, XP002239311, p. 42-49. |
Marjanovic, M.,“Interlace, Interleave, and Field Dominance,” http://www.mir.com/DMG/interl.html, pp. 1-5 (2001). |
Robinson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 15/097,750 entitled “Wide angle imaging directional backlights” filed Apr. 13, 2016. |
PCT/US2007/85475 International preliminary report on patentability dated May 26, 2009. |
PCT/US2007/85475 International search report and written opinion dated Apr. 10, 2008. |
PCT/US2009/060686 international preliminary report on patentability dated Apr. 19, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/060686 international search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Dec. 10, 2009. |
PCT/US2011/061511 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 21, 2013. |
PCT/US2011/061511 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jun. 29, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/037677 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jun. 29, 2012. |
PCT/US2012/042279 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Feb. 26, 2013. |
PCT/US2012/052189 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jan. 29, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041192 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 28, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041228 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041235 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041237 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated May 15, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041548 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041619 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041655 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041683 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041697 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/041703 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Aug. 27, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/049969 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Oct. 23, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/063125 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jan. 20, 2014. |
PCT/US2013/063133 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jan. 20, 2014. |
PCT/US2013/077288 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Apr. 18, 2014. |
PCT/US2014/017779 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated May 28, 2014. |
PCT/US2014/042721 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Oct. 10, 2014. |
PCT/US2014/057860 International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 5, 2016. |
PCT/US2014/057860 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jan. 5, 2015. |
PCT/US2014/060312 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jan. 19, 2015. |
PCT/US2014/060368 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jan. 14, 2015. |
PCT/US2014/065020 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated May 21, 2015. |
PCT/US2015/000327 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
PCT/US2015/021583 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Sep. 10, 2015. |
PCT/US2015/038024 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Dec. 30, 2015. |
PCT/US2016/027297 International search report and written opinion of international searching authority dated Jul. 26, 2017. |
PCT/US2016/027350 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Jul. 25, 2016. |
PCT/US2016/034418 International search report and written opinion of the international searching authority dated Sep. 7, 2016. |
Robinson et al., U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,878 entitled “Directional privacy display” filed Jun. 26, 2015. |
Dogruel, “A Method for concealment of displayed data”, Displays Devi, DEMPA Publications, Tokyo, JP, vol. 24, No. 3, Oct. 1, 2003 (Oct. 1, 2003), pp. 97-102. |
EP15811293.8 European Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150378085 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62017337 | Jun 2014 | US |