1. Technical Field
This invention relates to formable surgical fasteners and, more particularly, to directionally biased formable staples for use in surgical staplers having anvil pockets for forming the staples.
2. Background of Related Art
Surgical stapling instruments have become critical to many life saving surgical procedures. Surgical staples are usually mechanically inserted into tissue with surgical stapling instruments such as those known as anastomosis devices, including gastrointestinal anastomosis devices and transverse anastomosis devices. In such devices, the staples are loaded in one or more elongated rows into a cartridge. A mechanism for pushing, or driving the stapler is actuated to drive the staples through two or more sections of tissue toward a deforming anvil. At the conclusion of the driving operation, the legs of each staple are conventionally clamped or bent, by the anvil, to a closed configuration to complete the suture and join the tissue sections together. Gastrointestinal anastomosis-type devices drive and bend the staples aligned in a row sequentially in rapid sequence, while transverse anastomosis-type devices drive and bend all staples simultaneously. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,520,817 and 4,383,634. Circular anastomosis-type devices simultaneously apply annular rows of staples to tissue. See, e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,304,236.
One type of conventional staple 20, shown in
Because of their substantially circular cross-section (
For example, referring back to
Ix=1/4πr4
Its moment of inertia in the y twisting dimension (Iy) is given by the same equation
Iy=1/4πr4
Using a round wire stock of uniform 0.009 in diameter (r=0.0045),
The Moment of Inertia Ratio, given by the equation:
is Iy/Ix
In order to insure accurate and consistent formation of these conventional staples, considerable research and development has been conducted in the areas of forming and driving structures. For example, anvils have been developed with specific coatings and/or structure, see, e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,173,133 and 5,480,089. Also, staple cartridges have been configured with driver structure to balance forces encountered during staple formation. See, commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,978,049 to Green. Thus, to control and insure consistent staple formation without twisting or deformation, extremely strict manufacturing tolerances have been implemented.
Other types of staples for different types of instruments are also found in the prior art. Some have non-circular cross-section.
The Moment of Inertia Ratio is given by the equation:
where Ix=(1/12)bh3 and Iy=(1/12)hb3, with h=0.020 in. and b=0.015 in.
Thus, Ix=(1/12)(0.015)(0.020)3=1.0×10−8 in4, and
Iy=(1/12)(0.020)(0.015)3=6.0×10−9 in4.
Accordingly,
This staple is specifically configured to accommodate twisting during staple formation to permit the legs of the staple to cross as shown in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,479 describes a hernia staple with adjacent anvil having a height of 0.38 mm and a thickness of 0.51 mm. This staple is formed the same way as in
Ix=(1/12)(0.51)(0.38)3=2.33×10−3
Iy=(1/12)(0.38)(0.51)3=4.2×10−3
This staple for use as described would actually result in greater force to produce the desired shape. In fact, the staple legs would likely contact each other before crossing over into their crossed configuration.
Thus, it is apparent that this type of hernia staple, i.e. where the anvil is adjacent the backspan as the tissue is approached from only one side, is quite different than the staple of the present invention, e.g. the B-shaped staple, wherein the legs penetrate through the tissue to contact anvil pockets. These anvil pockets direct the staple legs to form the staple into a closed configuration. Thus staple configuration and considerations of twisting, bending and staple formation of these hernia staples are inapplicable to these considerations for anvil pocket directed staples, such as the B-shaped staples.
It would therefore be desirable to provide a staple configuration for a staple designed to penetrate tissue and contact an anvil pocket on the opposing side of tissue, which, in complement with conventional cartridge and anvil technology, enhances correct staple formation while reducing twisting/malformation caused by misalignment or unusual tissue while minimizing reliance on strict manufacturing tolerances.
In accordance with the present disclosure a directionally biased staple is provided for use in surgical staplers having anvil structure spaced from the cartridge and having anvil pockets against which the staple is formed as the legs are forced into contact with the anvil. The directionally biased staple may be constructed in a wide variety of cross-sectional configurations including rectangular, elliptical, trapezoidal, etc. All of the configurations are distinguished by having a bending region requiring more force to twist or malform the staple than is required to properly form the staple. Preferably, these staples have Moment of Inertia Ratios on the order of between about 1.1 to about 3.0. The staple preferably corresponds in other respects to conventionally formed staples, i.e. having at least a pair of leg members interconnected by a crown portion wherein the leg members come into contact with and are formed by the anvil.
Various preferred embodiments are described herein with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Preferred embodiments of the presently disclosed directionally biased staple will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings, in which like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding elements in each of the several views.
A directionally biased staple 50 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure is illustrated in
In this embodiment, the cross section is preferably formed in a substantially rectangular configuration as shown in
This cross-sectional configuration may be achieved by any known method including extrusion, rolling, coining, etc. Preferably, this configuration is accomplished by flat rolling round wire stock on opposing sides. In the fabrication process, the stock can be pre-rolled by the wire manufacturer or may be round wire stock which is rolled into the desired cross-sectional configuration by the staple manufacturer.
Iy of the cross-sectional configuration of the novel staple illustrated in
Iy=(1/12)(b)3(h)
For a base dimension b=0.010 in and a height dimension h=0.008 in,
Iy=(1/12)(0.010)3(0.008)
Iy=6.67×10−10 in4
Ix is given by the equation:
Ix=(1/12) (b)(h)3
Ix=(1/12) (0.010) (0.008)3
Ix=4.26×10−10 in4
The Moment of Inertia ratio (Iy/Ix) is thus
Similarly, for a base dimension b=0.012 in and a height dimension h=0.008 in, Ix=1.0×10−9 in4 and Iy=5.12×10−10 in4, yielding a Moment of Inertia ratio of 1.95.
Given that Iy defines the dimension corresponding to proper formation of the staple when fired and Ix defines the dimension corresponding to twisting and/or malformation, it is readily apparent that the directionally biased configurations provide a “functionally similar” forming force as a conventional round staple while requiring up to twice as much force to twist or malform when compared to conventional staples. This novel staple provides a substantial improvement over conventional staples.
Table 1 below sets forth by way of example Moment of Inertia Ratios for a variety of sizes and types of novel directionally biased staples for use in surgical staplers. Clearly staples of other dimensions are contemplated so long as they have the novel moment of inertia ratio described herein.
Further, as illustrated below, for comparable size staples, the novel staple configuration provides increased resistance to twist without changing firing forces.
For example, twisting stress σb is defined by the equation:
with moment M kept constant at M=1 lb·in.
For a conventional round 0.009 in. diameter staple: M=1 lb·in; c=0.0045 in; and Ix=Iy=3.22×10−10 in4, so
For the directionally biased staple of
Thus, not only is this embodiment of the novel staple more resistant to twisting and/or malformation, e.g.≈14,000 ksi for the conventional staple vs.≈7,500 ksi for the novel staple, it also maintains minimal firing forces. The directionally biased staple is effectively desensitized against the effects of misalignment during staple formation while, at the same time maintaining a minimal firing force. This directionally intelligent design can reduce malformations caused by misalignment or twisting as well as reduce the need for very sensitive manufacturing tolerances for anvils and anvil forming cups, cartridges, etc.
The benefits of the novel staple can also be appreciated by reference to the graphs of
As shown in
With reference to
There are various methods of manufacture of the surgical staple. For example, the method could include the steps of flat rolling the wire stock to form at least one flat surface thereon and cutting a length of round wire stock to a predetermined length corresponding to a desired length of a finished staple or extruding the stock with a flat surface. The stock is bent into a form having a backspan and a pair of legs wherein the staple has an aspect ratio of between about 1.1 to about 3.0.
Although a specific embodiment of the present disclosure has been described above in detail, it will be understood that this description is merely for purposes of illustration. Various modifications of and equivalent structures corresponding to the disclosed aspects of the preferred embodiment in addition to those described above may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure which is defined in the following claims, the scope of which is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass such modifications and equivalent structures. For example the anvil shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,480,089, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, can also be utilized.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/693,379 filed Oct. 20, 2000 now abandoned, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
30896 | La Prelle | May 1899 | A |
2008086 | Sorenson | Jul 1935 | A |
2122814 | Hansen | Jul 1938 | A |
2128443 | Vogel | Aug 1938 | A |
2153874 | Posnack | Apr 1939 | A |
3490675 | Green et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3494533 | Green | Feb 1970 | A |
3499591 | Green | Mar 1970 | A |
3564663 | Roberts | Feb 1971 | A |
4275813 | Noiles | Jun 1981 | A |
4281785 | Brooks | Aug 1981 | A |
4319576 | Rothfuss | Mar 1982 | A |
4407286 | Noiles et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4425915 | Ivanov | Jan 1984 | A |
4427008 | Transue | Jan 1984 | A |
4438769 | Pratt et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4454875 | Pratt et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4467805 | Fukuda | Aug 1984 | A |
4485816 | Krumme | Dec 1984 | A |
4531522 | Bedi et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4534351 | Rothfuss et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4550870 | Krumme et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4589582 | Bilotti | May 1986 | A |
4607638 | Crainich | Aug 1986 | A |
4724839 | Bedi et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4741336 | Failla et al. | May 1988 | A |
4747531 | Brinkerhoff et al. | May 1988 | A |
4767044 | Green | Aug 1988 | A |
D297764 | Hunt et al. | Sep 1988 | S |
4787387 | Burbank, III et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4805823 | Rothfuss | Feb 1989 | A |
4878608 | Mitsuhashi | Nov 1989 | A |
4887601 | Richards | Dec 1989 | A |
4955898 | Matsutani et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4978049 | Green | Dec 1990 | A |
5007921 | Brown | Apr 1991 | A |
5026390 | Brown | Jun 1991 | A |
5219353 | Garvey, III et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221036 | Takase | Jun 1993 | A |
5222975 | Crainich | Jun 1993 | A |
5242457 | Akopov et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246443 | Mai | Sep 1993 | A |
5342396 | Cook | Aug 1994 | A |
5350400 | Esposito et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5354306 | Garvey, III et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366479 | McGarry | Nov 1994 | A |
5395030 | Kuramoto et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5413584 | Schulze | May 1995 | A |
5415334 | Williamson, IV et al. | May 1995 | A |
5445648 | Cook | Aug 1995 | A |
5454814 | Comte | Oct 1995 | A |
D364462 | Michelson | Nov 1995 | S |
5480089 | Blewett | Jan 1996 | A |
5486187 | Schenck | Jan 1996 | A |
5489058 | Plyley et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497933 | DeFonzo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
D378409 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | S |
5630541 | Williamson, IV et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632432 | Schulze et al. | May 1997 | A |
5702048 | Eberlin | Dec 1997 | A |
5725554 | Simon et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732872 | Bolduc et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735444 | Wingert | Apr 1998 | A |
5738474 | Blewett | Apr 1998 | A |
5749896 | Cook | May 1998 | A |
5758812 | Raffoni | Jun 1998 | A |
5814055 | Knodel et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5890642 | Sato | Apr 1999 | A |
5941890 | Voegele et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947363 | Bolduc et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5947999 | Groiso | Sep 1999 | A |
5951576 | Wakabayashi | Sep 1999 | A |
5972023 | Tanner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993476 | Groiso | Nov 1999 | A |
6001110 | Adams | Dec 1999 | A |
6083242 | Cook | Jul 2000 | A |
6306150 | Levinson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
20020029044 | Monassevitch et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0251444 | Jan 1988 | EP |
716780 | Dec 1931 | FR |
2603794 | Sep 1986 | FR |
529968 | Dec 1957 | IT |
WO 9518572 | Jul 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040006372 A1 | Jan 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09693379 | Oct 2000 | US |
Child | 10424606 | US |