Engines may use various forms of fuel delivery to provide a desired amount of fuel for combustion in each cylinder. One type of fuel delivery uses a port injector for each cylinder to deliver fuel to respective cylinders. Still another type of fuel delivery uses a direct injector for each cylinder. Engines have also been described using more than one injector to provide fuel to a single cylinder in an attempt to improve engine performance. Specifically, in US 2005/0155578 an engine is described using a port fuel injector and a direct injector in each cylinder of the engine.
Another approach utilizing multiple injection locations for different fuel types is described in the papers titled “Calculations of Knock Suppression in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injection” and “Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engine: Biofuel Leveraging for Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions” by Heywood et al. Specifically, the Heywood et al. papers describes directly injecting ethanol to improve charge cooling effects, while relying on port injected gasoline for providing the majority of combusted fuel over a drive cycle.
The inventors herein have recognized several issues with such systems. For example, it may be desirable to utilize two direct in-cylinder injectors for each cylinder in order to expand the operating range of certain combustion modes by enabling the delivery of different substances directly to the combustion chamber. However, in-cylinder direct injection systems can add significant cost and complexity to the engine system.
As one example, the above issues may be addressed by an engine system for a vehicle, comprising a combustion chamber; a first in-cylinder direct injector configured to deliver a first substance including at least gasoline directly to the combustion chamber at a first pressure; and a second in-cylinder direct injector configured to deliver a second substance including at least an alcohol directly to the combustion chamber at a second pressure less than the first pressure.
As another example, the above issues may be addressed by a method of operating an internal combustion engine including at least one combustion chamber, comprising: during each of a plurality of cycles of the combustion chamber: injecting a first substance including at least gasoline directly into the combustion chamber at a first pressure via a first in-cylinder direct injector; injecting a second substance including at least an alcohol directly into the combustion chamber at a second pressure less than the first pressure via a second in-cylinder direct injector; and initiating combustion of a mixture of air and the first and the second injected substances within the combustion chamber.
In this way, it is possible to provide different substances directly to the combustion chamber while also reducing the cost and complexity of one of the injection systems by instead utilizing a lower pressure injector for the delivery of a knock suppressing substance such as an alcohol. Further, engine knock may be reduced during spark ignition operation and auto-ignition timing may be controlled during the controlled auto-ignition operation by adjusting the amounts and/or timings of the delivery of two or more different substances via separate higher and lower pressure direct injections systems as will be described in greater detail herein.
In one example, the different substances may represent different fuels having different levels of alcohol, including one substance being gasoline and the other being ethanol. In another example, engine 10 may use gasoline as a first substance and an alcohol containing fuel such as ethanol, methanol, a mixture of gasoline and ethanol (e.g., E85 which is approximately 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline), a mixture of gasoline and methanol (e.g., M85 which is approximately 85% methanol and 15% gasoline), a mixture of an alcohol and water, a mixture of an alcohol, water, and gasoline, etc as a second substance. In still another example, the first substance may be a gasoline alcohol blend with a lower alcohol concentration than a gasoline alcohol blend of a second substance.
In one embodiment, when using both gasoline and a fuel having alcohol (e.g., ethanol), it may be possible to adjust operating conditions to take advantage of the increased charge cooling of alcohol fuels (e.g., via direct injection) to provide improved engine performance, because of the different properties of alcohol. This phenomenon, combined with increased compression ratio, and/or boosting and/or engine downsizing, can then be used to obtain fuel economy benefits (by reducing the knock limitations on the engine), while also allowing engine operation with improved engine output torque, for example.
Referring now to
In the embodiment shown in
As one example, the first substance may include a fuel and the second substance may include a knock suppressing substance such as ethanol, methanol, or water. Injectors 66a and 66b may have different configurations for injecting different substances as described in greater detail with reference to
Internal combustion engine 10, comprising a plurality of combustion chambers, is controlled by electronic engine controller 12. Electronic engine controller 12 may be a component of control system 6 described with reference to
Combustion chamber, or cylinder, 30 is shown communicating with intake manifold 44 and exhaust manifold 48 via respective intake valves 52a and 52b (not shown), and exhaust valves 54a and 54b (not shown). Thus, while four valves per cylinder may be used, in another example, a single intake and single exhaust valve per cylinder may also be used. In still another example, two intake valves and one exhaust valve per cylinder may be used.
Combustion chamber 30 can have a compression ratio, which is the ratio of volumes when piston 36 is at bottom center to top center. Conventionally, the compression ratio is in the range of 9:1 to 10:1 However, when higher octane fuels, fuels with a higher latent enthalpy of vaporization, and/or direct injection is used, the compression ratio can be raised due to the mitigating effects that octane, latent enthalpy of vaporization, and direct injection have on knock.
Fuel injectors 66a and 66b are shown directly coupled to combustion chamber 30 for delivering injected fuel or other substance directly therein in proportion to the pulse width of signal dfpw received from controller 12 via electronic drivers 68 and 69, respectively. While
A first substance may be delivered to direct injector 66a by a higher pressure fuel system including a fuel tank, one or more of fuel pumps, and a fuel rail. The first substance may include gasoline only, mixtures of gasoline and alcohol, or mixtures of gasoline and water, among other combinations. A second substance may be delivered to direct injector 66b by a lower pressure fuel system including a fuel tank, and a fuel pump at a lower pressure than the higher pressure fuel system, in which case the timing of the direct fuel injection provided by injector 66b may be more limited during the compression stroke than with the higher pressure fuel system coupled to injector 66a. The second substance can include alcohol only (e.g. ethanol, methanol, etc.), mixtures of alcohol and gasoline, or mixtures of alcohol, gasoline, and water. As one non-limiting example, the second substance provided by the lower pressure fuel system may include a greater concentration of alcohol than the first substance provided by the higher pressure fuel system. As another non-limiting example, the first and the second substance may include the same concentration or ratios of gasoline and alcohol. While not shown, the fuel lines supplying the various substances to injectors 66a and 66b may include a pressure transducer providing a signal to controller 12 for managing pump operation.
Intake manifold 44 is shown communicating with throttle body 58 via throttle plate 62. In this particular example, throttle plate 62 is coupled to electric motor 94 so that the position of elliptical throttle plate 62 is controlled by controller 12 via electric motor 94. This configuration may be referred to as electronic throttle control (ETC), which can also be utilized during idle speed control. In an alternative embodiment (not shown), a bypass air passageway is arranged in parallel with throttle plate 62 to control inducted airflow during idle speed control via an idle control by-pass valve positioned within the air passageway. In the latter alternative, throttle plate 62 is actuated by the operator of the vehicle, the cable, or other device, between the accelerator pedal and the throttle valve not shown.
Exhaust gas sensor 76 is shown coupled to exhaust manifold 48 upstream of catalytic converter 70 (where sensor 76 can correspond to various different sensors). For example, sensor 76 may be any of many known sensors for providing an indication of exhaust gas air/fuel ratio such as a linear oxygen sensor, a UEGO, a two-state oxygen sensor, an EGO, a HEGO, or an HC or CO sensor. In this particular example, sensor 76 is a two-state oxygen sensor that provides signal EGO to controller 12 which converts signal EGO into two-state signal EGOS. A high voltage state of signal EGOS indicates exhaust gases are rich of stoichiometry and a low voltage state of signal EGOS indicates exhaust gases are lean of stoichiometry. Signal EGOS may be used to advantage during feedback air/fuel control to maintain average air/fuel at stoichiometry during a stoichiometric, homogeneous mode of operation.
Distributorless ignition system 88 provides ignition spark to combustion chamber 30 via spark plug 92 in response to spark advance signal SA from controller 12.
Controller 12 may cause combustion chamber 30 to operate in a variety of combustion modes, including a homogeneous air/fuel mode and/or a stratified air/fuel mode by controlling injection timing, injection amounts, spray patterns, etc. Further, combined stratified and homogenous mixtures may be formed in the chamber. In one example, stratified layers may be formed by operating injector 66 during a compression stroke. In another example, a homogenous mixture may be formed by operating injector 66 during an intake stroke (which may be open valve injection). In yet another example, a homogenous mixture may be formed by operating injector 66 before an intake stroke (which may be closed valve injection). In still other examples, multiple injections from injector 66 may be used during one or more strokes (e.g., intake, compression, exhaust, etc.). Even further examples may be where different injection timings and mixture formations are used under different conditions, as described below.
Controller 12 can adjust the amount of fuel or other substance delivered by fuel injectors 66a and 66b so that the homogeneous, stratified, or combined homogenous/stratified air/fuel mixture in chamber 30 can be selected to be at stoichiometry, a value rich of stoichiometry, or a value lean of stoichiometry. As one non-limiting example, controller 12 can control fuel injectors 66a and 66b so that a homogeneous charge is formed in the combustion chamber for facilitating homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) via controlled auto-ignition (CAI) as will be described herein.
Emission control device 72 is shown positioned downstream of catalytic converter 70. Emission control device 72 may be a three-way catalyst, particulate filter, NOx trap, or combinations thereof.
Controller 12 is shown as a microcomputer, including microprocessor unit 102, input/output ports 104, an electronic storage medium for executable programs and calibration values shown as read only memory chip 106 in this particular example, random access memory 108, keep alive memory 110, and a conventional data bus. Controller 12 is shown receiving various signals from sensors coupled to engine 10, in addition to those signals previously discussed, including measurement of inducted mass air flow (MAF) from mass air flow sensor 100 coupled to throttle body 58; engine coolant temperature (ECT) from temperature sensor 112 coupled to cooling sleeve 114; a profile ignition pickup signal (PIP) from Hall effect sensor 118 coupled to crankshaft 40; and throttle position TP from throttle position sensor 120; absolute manifold pressure signal MAP from sensor 122; an indication of knock from knock sensor 182; and an indication of absolute or relative ambient humidity from sensor 180. Engine speed signal RPM is generated by controller 12 from signal PIP in a conventional manner and manifold pressure signal MAP from a manifold pressure sensor provides an indication of vacuum, or pressure, in the intake manifold. During stoichiometric operation, this sensor can give an indication of engine load. Further, this sensor, along with engine speed, can provide an estimate of charge (including air) inducted into the cylinder. In one example, sensor 118, which is also used as an engine speed sensor, produces a predetermined number of equally spaced pulses every revolution of the crankshaft.
Continuing with
While this example shows a system in which the intake and exhaust valve timing are controlled concurrently, variable intake cam timing, variable exhaust cam timing, dual independent variable cam timing, or fixed cam timing may be used. Further, variable valve lift may also be used. Further, camshaft profile switching may be used to provide a plurality (usually two) cam profiles which can be selected based on operating conditions. Further still, the valvetrain may be roller finger follower, direct acting mechanical bucket, electromechanical, electrohydraulic, or other alternatives to rocker arms.
Continuing with the variable cam timing system, teeth 138, being coupled to housing 136 and camshaft 130, allow for measurement of relative cam position via cam timing sensor 150 providing signal VCT to controller 12. Teeth 1, 2, 3, and 4 are preferably used for measurement of cam timing and are equally spaced (for example, in a V-8 dual bank engine, spaced 90 degrees apart from one another) while tooth 5 is preferably used for cylinder identification, as described later herein. In addition, controller 12 sends control signals (LACT, RACT) to conventional solenoid valves (not shown) to control the flow of hydraulic fluid either into advance chamber 142, retard chamber 144, or neither.
Relative cam timing can be measured in a variety of ways. In general terms, the time, or rotation angle, between the rising edge of the PIP signal and receiving a signal from one of the plurality of teeth 138 on housing 136 gives a measure of the relative cam timing. For the particular example of a V-8 engine, with two cylinder banks and a five-toothed wheel, a measure of cam timing for a particular bank is received four times per revolution, with the extra signal used for cylinder identification.
Sensor 160 may also provide an indication of oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas via signal 162, which provides controller 12 a voltage indicative of the O2 concentration. For example, sensor 160 can be a HEGO, UEGO, EGO, or other type of exhaust gas sensor. Also note that, as described above with regard to sensor 76, sensor 160 can correspond to various different sensors.
As described above,
While not shown in
Referring now specifically to
Also, a twin turbocharger arrangement, and/or a sequential turbocharger arrangement, may be used if desired. In the case of multiple adjustable turbocharger and/or stages, it may be desirable to vary a relative amount of expansion though the turbocharger, depending on operating conditions (e.g. manifold pressure, airflow, engine speed, etc.). Further, a mechanically or electrically driven supercharger may be used, if desired.
Referring now to
In one example, both injectors may be sized to meet peak torque requirements (for example a maximum airflow or aircharge). However, in an example where one injector provides gasoline and the other injector provides an alcohol blend (e.g., ethanol, E85, methanol, etc.), the power densities of the fuels may be different. In such a case, the injector for the alcohol based fuel may be sized to provide a different maximum fuel flow (e.g., approximately 37% higher to account for pure ethanol).
Referring now specifically to
In this way, the respective injectors may be designed to provide different functionality and/or injection type (e.g., fuel type) compatibility so that improved engine operation and control may be achieved. As noted herein, an injection type may refer to different injection locations, different substances being injected (e.g., water vs. fuel), different fuel types being injected, different fuel blends being injected, different alcohol contents being injected (e.g., 0% vs. 85%), etc. Further note that different injection types may also refer to different substances being injected via a common injector, where a type 1 injection may be a gasoline amount in the injection and type 2 injection may be an alcohol amount in the injection.
Referring now to
Referring now specifically to
A second tank 520 for holding a second substance is shown fluidly coupled with injector 66b via a lower pressure pump 522 and fuel rail 524. As one non-limiting example, pump 522 can deliver the second substance to injector 66b from tank 520 at a pressure within the range of 20 and 35 bar. However, it should be appreciated that in other examples, higher or lower pressures may be provided by pump 522. Further, it should be appreciated that the fuel system associated with injector 66b can include two or more pumps. Pump 522 may be configured as a lift pump in some examples, and may be arranged within tank 520.
In one example, the tank 510 contains a gasoline or a gasoline and alcohol blend with a greater concentration of gasoline than tank 520, while the tank 520 contains an alcohol or alcohol and gasoline blend which contains a greater concentration of alcohol than tank 510. However, other fuel types or substances may also be used as described herein.
Further still, it should be appreciated that in some examples, tanks 510 and 520 may form a common tank, whereby the first substance provided to the engine via injector 66a and the second substance provided to the engine via injector 66b may include the same composition. For example, injectors 66a and 66b may receive a fuel mixture including gasoline and an alcohol from a common fuel tank at different pressures via separate pumps.
Referring now to
One or both the fuel systems shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
As indicated at 814, if the CAI mode is selected at 812, the routine can proceed to 825. Alternatively, if the SI mode or other non-CAI mode is selected at 812, the routine can proceed to 816. As one example, the control system may initiate SI mode where the CAI mode is not selected as directed by the mode map of
For example, at 816, the amount and timing of delivery of a fuel (e.g. gasoline) and a knock suppressing substance (e.g. an alcohol) may be selected based on operating conditions. As one example, the control system may reference a map or look-up table as described with reference to
As indicated at 823, if engine knock is indicated, for example, via a knock sensor, the absolute amount and/or relative amount of the knock suppressing substance that is delivered to the combustion chamber may be increased. For example, the pulse width of the lower pressure injector may be increased to provide additional knock suppressing substance to the combustion chamber to thereby reduce engine knock. Note that the increase in the absolute amount of the knock suppressing substance may also be accompanied by a corresponding reduction in the amount of the fuel provided to the combustion chamber via the higher pressure injector to maintain a prescribed air/fuel ratio. Thus, air/fuel ratio detection in the exhaust gases may be used to assist the control system to vary the injections performed by the higher and lower pressure injectors responsive to knock detection.
Returning to 814, if CAI mode is selected, at 825 the amount and timing of the delivery of the fuel and knock suppressing substance may be selected based on the operating conditions identified at 810 to control the timing of auto-ignition. For example, the control system may reference a map or look-up table as described with reference to
At 830, it may be judged whether to advance the auto-ignition timing. For example, the control system may control the auto-ignition timing within a prescribed range around TDC. If the auto-ignition timing is to be advanced, at 832 the control system may reduce the absolute amount of the knock suppressing substance that is delivered to the combustion chamber and/or reduce the relative amount of the knock suppression substance compared to the fuel that is delivered to the combustion chamber. Additionally, or alternatively, the control system may vary the timing of the injection of the knock suppressing substance via at least the lower pressure injector to advance the auto-ignition timing.
Alternatively, at 836, if it is judged that the auto-ignition timing is to be retarded, then at 838, the control system may increase the absolute amount of the knock suppressing substance that is delivered to the combustion chamber and/or increase the relative amount of the knock suppression substance compared to the fuel that is delivered to the combustion chamber. Additionally, or alternatively, the control system may vary the timing of the injection of the knock suppressing substance via at least the lower pressure injector to retard the auto-ignition timing. Further, as indicated at 842, the control system may also vary the amount of the fuel delivered to the combustion chamber via the higher pressure injector responsive to a change in the absolute amount of the knock suppressing substance to maintain a prescribed air/fuel ratio.
In this way, the control system may utilize different fueling strategies via a lower pressure in-cylinder direct injector and a higher pressure in-cylinder direct injector depending on the selected combustion mode.
During at least a portion of the intake stroke, at least one intake valve of the cylinder may be momentarily opened to admit air into the combustion chamber. The air admitted to the cylinder may be compressed by the piston during the compression stroke along with any of the first and/or second substances that were delivered to the combustion chamber by the first and/or second direct in-cylinder injectors. After the mixture of air and either of the injected substances are compressed, the mixture may be ignited to provide for the power stroke, whereby the combustion causes the mixture to expand forcing the piston toward BDC. Note that combustion may be initiated by an ignition spark in the case of SI combustion or by compression performed by the piston in the case of CAI combustion. Finally, at least some of the products of the combustion event may be exhaust from the cylinder during the exhaust stroke by momentarily opening at least one of the exhaust valves to release the gases from the combustion chamber. In this way, the four stroke cycle may be repeated.
Note that the cycles shown in each of the graphs of
In each of the examples of
As one non-limiting example, the lower pressure injector may inject the first substance including at least ethanol and the higher pressure injector may inject the second substance including at least gasoline or a mixture of gasoline and ethanol, whereby the first substance has a greater concentration of ethanol than the second substance. As another example, the lower pressure direct injector can deliver the second substance including at least gasoline or a mixture of gasoline and ethanol and the higher pressure direct injector can deliver the first substance including at least ethanol of a higher concentration than the second substance.
As yet another example, the lower pressure injector may inject the first substance and the higher pressure injector may inject the second substance, whereby the first substance has a higher or lower octane rating than the second substance.
As shown by
As shown by
For example, as shown by
For example, as shown by
Note that the example control and estimation routines included herein can be used with various engine and/or vehicle system configurations. The specific routines described herein may represent one or more of any number of processing strategies such as event-driven, interrupt-driven, multi-tasking, multi-threading, and the like. As such, various acts, operations, or functions illustrated may be performed in the sequence illustrated, in parallel, or in some cases omitted. Likewise, the order of processing is not necessarily required to achieve the features and advantages of the example embodiments described herein, but is provided for ease of illustration and description. One or more of the illustrated acts or functions may be repeatedly performed depending on the particular strategy being used. Further, the described acts may graphically represent code to be programmed into the computer readable storage medium in the engine control system.
It will be appreciated that the configurations and routines disclosed herein are exemplary in nature, and that these specific embodiments are not to be considered in a limiting sense, because numerous variations are possible. For example, the above technology can be applied to V-6, I-4, I-6, V-12, opposed 4, and other engine types. The subject matter of the present disclosure includes all novel and nonobvious combinations and subcombinations of the various systems and configurations, and other features, functions, and/or properties disclosed herein.
The following claims particularly point out certain combinations and subcombinations regarded as novel and nonobvious. These claims may refer to “an” element or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof. Such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements. Other combinations and subcombinations of the disclosed features, functions, elements, and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or through presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such claims, whether broader, narrower, equal, or different in scope to the original claims, also are regarded as included within the subject matter of the present disclosure.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/168,245 filed Jun. 24, 2011, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 8,235,024, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/871,496 filed Oct. 12, 2007, which is now U.S. Pat. No. 7,971,567, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2101554 | Meyer | Dec 1937 | A |
2221405 | Nallinger | Nov 1940 | A |
3589348 | Reichhelm | Jun 1971 | A |
3794000 | Hodgkinson | Feb 1974 | A |
3826234 | Cinquegrani | Jul 1974 | A |
4031864 | Crothers | Jun 1977 | A |
4122803 | Miller | Oct 1978 | A |
4136652 | Lee | Jan 1979 | A |
4205650 | Szwarchiber | Jun 1980 | A |
4210103 | Dimitroff et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4256075 | Fukui et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4311118 | Slagle | Jan 1982 | A |
4325329 | Taylor | Apr 1982 | A |
4331121 | Stokes | May 1982 | A |
4385593 | Brooks | May 1983 | A |
4402296 | Schwarz | Sep 1983 | A |
4411243 | Hardenberg et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4459930 | Flory | Jul 1984 | A |
4480616 | Takeda | Nov 1984 | A |
4489596 | Linder et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4499885 | Weissenbach et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4502453 | Kabasin et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4519341 | McGarr | May 1985 | A |
4541383 | Jessel | Sep 1985 | A |
4558665 | Sandberg et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4590904 | Wannenwetsch | May 1986 | A |
4648367 | Gillbrand et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4664091 | Royer | May 1987 | A |
4706630 | Wineland et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4810929 | Strumbos | Mar 1989 | A |
4817576 | Abe et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4930537 | Farmer | Jun 1990 | A |
4945881 | Gonze et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4962789 | Benscoter | Oct 1990 | A |
4993386 | Ozasa et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4993388 | Mitsumoto | Feb 1991 | A |
4998518 | Mitsumoto | Mar 1991 | A |
5017826 | Oshima et al. | May 1991 | A |
5018483 | Kashima et al. | May 1991 | A |
5044331 | Suga et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5044344 | Tuckey et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5050555 | Mitsumoto | Sep 1991 | A |
5056490 | Kashima | Oct 1991 | A |
5056494 | Kayanuma | Oct 1991 | A |
5060610 | Paro | Oct 1991 | A |
5097803 | Galvin | Mar 1992 | A |
5111795 | Thompson | May 1992 | A |
5131228 | Mochizuki et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5150683 | Depa et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5174247 | Tosa et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5188087 | Saito | Feb 1993 | A |
5193508 | Motoyama et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5204630 | Seitz et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5230309 | Suga et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233944 | Mochizuki | Aug 1993 | A |
5241933 | Morikawa | Sep 1993 | A |
5335637 | Davis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5336396 | Shetley | Aug 1994 | A |
5357908 | Sung et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5360034 | Der Manuelian | Nov 1994 | A |
5408979 | Backlund et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417239 | Ford | May 1995 | A |
5469830 | Gonzalez | Nov 1995 | A |
5477836 | Hyodo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5508582 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515280 | Suzuki | May 1996 | A |
5560344 | Chan | Oct 1996 | A |
5565157 | Sugimoto et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5694908 | Hsu | Dec 1997 | A |
5713336 | King et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722362 | Takano et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740784 | McKinney | Apr 1998 | A |
5782092 | Schultalbers et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5806500 | Fargo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5875743 | Dickey | Mar 1999 | A |
5887566 | Glauber et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5921222 | Freeland | Jul 1999 | A |
5979400 | Nishide | Nov 1999 | A |
6017646 | Prasad et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035837 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042955 | Okamoto | Mar 2000 | A |
6112705 | Nakayama et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6112725 | McKinney | Sep 2000 | A |
6119637 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6189516 | Hei Ma | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6213086 | Chmela et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6229253 | Iwata et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234123 | Iiyama et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237339 | Asen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6318083 | Machida et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325039 | Goto | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332448 | Ilyama et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6344246 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6371151 | Saylor | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382225 | Tipton | May 2002 | B1 |
6467470 | Carlsson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494192 | Capshaw et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505579 | Lee | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6553974 | Wickman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6617769 | Suzuki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6619242 | Kaneko | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622663 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622664 | Holder et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6622690 | Ando et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6651432 | Gray, Jr. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6659068 | Urushihara et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6681739 | Mamiya et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684849 | zur Loye et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691669 | Surnilla et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6698387 | McFarland et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711893 | Ueda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6792966 | Harvey | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805107 | Vinyard | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6845616 | Jauss | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6866950 | Connor et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6928983 | Mashiki | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951202 | Oda | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959693 | Oda | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972093 | Partridge et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978762 | Mori | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6988485 | Ichise et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990956 | Niimi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7011048 | Gurin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7013844 | Oda | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7055500 | Miyashita et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7082926 | Sadakane et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107942 | Weissman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7159568 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7178503 | Brehob | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7225787 | Bromberg et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7255080 | Leone | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7261064 | Bhaisora et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7278396 | Leone et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287492 | Leone et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287509 | Brehob | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293552 | Leone et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7302933 | Kerns | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7337754 | Dearth et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350504 | Yasunaga et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357101 | Boyarski | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367317 | Miyazaki et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373931 | Lennox et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7389751 | Leone | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395786 | Leone et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406947 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7412966 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7424881 | Kerns | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426907 | Dearth et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426908 | Brehob | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426925 | Leone et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428895 | Leone et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7444987 | Cohn et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454285 | Christie et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7461628 | Blumberg et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7487631 | Cueman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493879 | Fujii et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493897 | Arakawa et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7533651 | Surnilla | May 2009 | B2 |
7556023 | Ilhoshi et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7578281 | Russell et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7581528 | Stein et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584740 | Boyarski | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594498 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637250 | Bromberg et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640912 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7640913 | Blumberg et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7640914 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7640915 | Cohn et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647899 | Dearth et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647916 | Leone et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7665428 | Dearth et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7665452 | Russell et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676321 | Andri | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681554 | Stein et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694666 | Lewis et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703446 | Bromberg et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7721710 | Leone et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7726265 | Bromberg et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730872 | Leone et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740009 | Shelby et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7765982 | Lewis et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7779813 | Hahn | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789063 | Lewis et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7845315 | Leone et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7849842 | Lewis et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7869930 | Stein et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7877189 | Leone | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7886729 | Russell et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7900933 | Tones et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7909019 | Stein | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7913668 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7933713 | Leone | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7942128 | Leone et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7971567 | Zubeck et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7971575 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8015951 | Dearth et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028678 | Stein | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8065979 | Leone et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8118009 | Pursifull et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8132555 | Lewis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8235024 | Zubeck et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8245690 | Stein | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8297255 | Bidner et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
20010035215 | Tipton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020139111 | Ueda et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030089337 | Cohn et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127072 | Gmelin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040035395 | Heywood et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065274 | Cohn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083717 | Zhu et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040149644 | Partridge et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040250790 | Heywood et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261763 | Hashimoto et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050051135 | Tomoda et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066939 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097888 | Miyashita | May 2005 | A1 |
20050103285 | Oda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109316 | Oda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109319 | Oda | May 2005 | A1 |
20050155577 | Ichise et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050155578 | Ichise et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166896 | Sadakane et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050172931 | Mori | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178356 | Shibagaki | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178360 | Satou | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050183698 | Yonezawa | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050274353 | Okubo et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060016429 | Mashiki | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060075991 | Heywood et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090732 | Shibagaki | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102136 | Bromberg et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102145 | Cohn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060102146 | Cohn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060180099 | Aimoto et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191727 | Usami et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070028861 | Kamio et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070028905 | Shinagawa et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070034192 | Kamio et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070119391 | Fried et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070119411 | Kerns | May 2007 | A1 |
20070204813 | Arai et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219679 | Coulmeau | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219701 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070221163 | Kamio | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080046161 | Blumberg et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080053399 | Bromberg et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080092851 | Arakawa et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080156303 | Bromberg et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080173278 | Bromberg et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080288158 | Leone | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090065409 | Kamio et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090159057 | Pursifull et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100006050 | Bromberg et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024772 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100288232 | Bromberg et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120067033 | Leone et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120152211 | Pursifull et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166065 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1536203 | Oct 2004 | CN |
19954979 | Jun 2001 | DE |
1057988 | Nov 2006 | EP |
59068535 | Apr 1984 | JP |
61065066 | Apr 1986 | JP |
62210229 | Sep 1987 | JP |
01195926 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02070968 | Mar 1990 | JP |
3111664 | May 1991 | JP |
5163976 | Jun 1993 | JP |
7019124 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2002227730 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2005146973 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007056754 | Mar 2007 | JP |
200882258 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2031238 | Mar 1995 | RU |
9739235 | Oct 1997 | WO |
2004097198 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2006023313 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2006055540 | May 2006 | WO |
2007106354 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2007106416 | Sep 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 60/790,715, filed Apr. 10, 2006, Bromberg et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/746,507, filed May 5, 2006, Cohn et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/747,865, filed May 22, 2006, Heywood et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/973,499, filed Sep. 19, 2007, Bromberg. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/948,753, filed Jun. 10, 2007, Bromberg et al. |
Australian examiner's first report on patent application No. 2007202600, Australian Government, IP Australia, Nov. 3, 2011, 2 pages. |
Office Action of Chinese Application No. 200610148453.4, Issued Mar. 24, 2011, State Intellectual Property Office of PRC, 9 Pages. |
Unknown Author, “Honda Making Significant Progress on HCCI Engine for Hybrid Application,” http://www.greencarcongress.com/2005/10/honda—making—si.html, Oct. 28, 2005, 8 pages. |
Bromberg, L. et al., “Calculations of Knock Suppressions in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines Using Direct Ethanol Injector,” Jul. 7, 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
Cohn, D.R. et al., “Direct Injection Ethanol Boosted Gasoline Engines: Biofuel Leveraging for Cost Effective Reduction of Oil Dependence and CO2 Emissions,” Mar. 15, 2005, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
Kamio, J. et al., “Study on HCCI-SI Combustion Using Fuels Containing Ethanol,” SAE Technical Papers Series No. 2007-01-4051, Powertrain & Fluid Systems Conference & Exhibition, Rosemont IL, Oct. 29-Nov. 1, 2007, 12 pages. |
Hunter, M. Park, “1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire,” originally appeared in Special Interest Autos, Apr. 1996, http://www.tctc.com/˜part/mph/pageCLIP/page62JET/62jet.htm, Nov. 7, 2006. |
Brusca, S. et al., “Water Injection in IC-SI Engines to Control Detonation and the Reduce Pollutant Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2003-01-1912, May 19-22, 2003. |
Russ, Stephen, “A Review of the Effect of Engine Operating Conditions on Borderline Kick,” SAE Technical Paper Series 960497, Feb. 26-29, 1996. |
Vance, Bill, “Turbocharger Boosted Engine's Efficiency: Developed to maintain high-altitude performance,” for the Calgary Herald Edmonton, http://www.ucalgary.ca/˜csimpson/Articles/JetFire.html, Nov. 7, 2006. |
ISA/UK, Intellectual Property Office Search Report of GB 0822341.4, Mar. 10, 2009, United Kingdom, 2 pages. |
Pursifull, Ross Dykstra et al., “On-Board Fuel Vapor Separation for Multi-Fuel Vehicle,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,755, filed Sep. 14, 2012, 53 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120298072 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13168245 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13569016 | US | |
Parent | 11871496 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13168245 | US |