Isolation bearings are used to add damping or increase a response period of a structure, such as a bridge. The five core performance functions of an isolation bearing are to transfer a vertical load, allow for large lateral displacements, produce a damping force, produce a spring restoring force, and allow for structure rotation. Two fundamental types of isolation bearings are used to accomplish these performance functions: sliding bearings and steel reinforced elastomeric bearings (SREB). Sliding bearings provide damping to a structure through frictional energy dissipation, but must include additional means to provide a restoring spring force. Elastomeric bearings provide restoring forces, but must include additional means to provide damping to the structure. Sliding isolators can incorporate springs to provide a restoring force. The isolation bearing disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,491,937, for example, incorporates elastomeric compression springs. Upon displacement, both sliding and spring compression occurs, providing the necessary damping and restoring force requirements.
One drawback to sliding bearings with external springs is the space and cost required to fit the springs. Typically, compression springs can only be compressed to about 60% of their free length. At least one compression spring is required on each side of the bearing, meaning that the plan dimension of an isolator would be at least L=B+(2 d/0.6)=B+3.33 d, where L is the bearing plan dimension, B the load bearing element dimension, and d is the isolator seismic displacement. For small seismic displacements, this is typically not a severe limitation, but for large seismic displacements, the springs become overly-large and the bearing becomes too costly. In regions of high seismicity it is not uncommon to have seismic displacements of twelve inches and higher, resulting in bearing plan dimensions of forty-eight inches and larger. One problematic characteristic of such a bearing is that the spring rate is usually inversely proportional to spring length and proportional to its cross sectional area. Thus, if a long spring is used to accommodate a large seismic displacement, its diameter has to be large or the spring will be too weak. Thus, large seismic displacements cause both of the bearing's plan dimension and height to grow.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,599,834 describes a system in which a steel-reinforced elastomeric bearing's (SREB) upper surface is permitted to slide relative to the super structure, i.e., in essence sliding on top of an SREB. The center core of the SREB houses a friction element that is preloaded with compression springs, such that when the SREB displaces, sliding friction occurs. The internal friction mechanism serves to boost damping, as SREBs are typically low-damping bearings. Due to size constraints the mechanical spring friction mechanism is limited in the amount of vertical load it can support, e.g., it is not uncommon for bridge bearing loads to exceed 1,000 tons. Hence, for structural bearing applications the majority of the vertical load in such a design must be supported by the SREB. Further, displacement in the design is constrained to the central annular region. Since large displacements require large clearances, the practical design range is limited to small vertical loads and small displacements (e.g., mechanical equipment applications or small pedestrian bridges).
U.S. Pat. No. 5,867,951 describes a design in which a sliding isolator is stacked on top of an elastomeric bearing isolator. This approach prevents the isolator from sticking in one place due to static friction, thus allowing the isolator to attenuate high frequency vibrations. Shortcomings of this approach include the cost of profiling the sliding surface and the increase in structure elevation due to lateral displacement of the isolator.
Elastomeric isolation bearings can use both internal and external means to provide damping to the structure. A common external approach incorporates a central lead plug, to form a lead rubber bearing, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,117,637, 4,499,694, and 4,593,502. Lead rubber bearing isolators are a widely-used type of seismic isolator. Elastomeric bearings in conjunction with dampers and mild steel elements have also been used, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,160,864. The elastomer can also be compounded to increase its damping capabilities, as in the case of high damping rubber bearings, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,107,389, but the level of damping is usually limited to less than 20% damping. Though rubber compounds exist with very high levels of damping, they exhibit high levels of creep, rendering them unsatisfactory for the vertical load performance function. A structure situated on a bearing with high creep properties would sag, leading to structural problems.
Restoring force issues aside, sliding bearings can be designed to accommodate high displacements by making the sliding surface larger. For SREBs, the problem is more complex. There are design limits on how much an elastomeric bearing can shear; if it displaces too much the isolator can buckle. One way to prevent this is to make the bearing larger in plan. But as the bearing grows in plan dimensions, it becomes stiffer in shear, and the height must be increased as well. Thus, the entire bearing grows. Another problem is that the axial compressive pressure decreases with increasing plan dimension; thus, lead rubber bearings require high pressures to help maintain lead core confinement.
The embodiments of the present invention eliminate many of the key shortcomings of previous isolator designs as detailed above. This embodiments disclosed herein are isolation bearings that are capable of accommodating large seismic displacements. The isolation bearings reduce seismic forces and accelerations transferred from the ground to buildings, bridges, and other types of structures. The bearings accomplish this by softening the otherwise rigid connection between structural supports and the portion of the structure to be isolated. Often this connection occurs on top of the foundations for buildings and on top of bridge substructure elements, such as piers and abutments. Many of the embodiments use a central sliding high-load bearing element in conjunction with at least one shear spring element that is located, for example, at the bearing's periphery. The sliding surface provides damping while the shear spring provides a restoring force for the isolation bearing.
One example seismic isolation bearing includes an upper base plate, a lower base plate, a disc bearing core, and at least one shear spring. The upper and lower base plates each have an upper surface and a lower surface. The disc bearing core is centrally positioned with respect to the planes of the upper and lower base plates and is in contact with the lower surface of the upper base plate and the upper surface of the lower base plate, where the disc bearing core allows the lower surface of the upper base plate to slide along the disc bearing core. The shear spring is coupled to the lower surface of the upper base plate and the upper surface of the lower base plate and deforms in shear upon lateral movement of the upper base plate relative to the lower base plate. The shear spring exerts a lateral return force on the upper base plate when the upper base plate is laterally displaced.
In many embodiments, the shear spring includes alternating layers of an elastomeric material and a substrate material, where the shear spring is configured to deform in shear along the layers of elastomeric material. In such embodiments, the height of each layer of elastomeric material may be high compared to the plan area of the layer. For example, the shape factor of each layer of elastomeric material may be less than a value of 1. Further, the height of each layer of substrate material may be smaller than the height of each layer of elastomeric material to provide added damping. In many embodiments, the elastomeric material is rubber and the substrate material is steel. Alternatively, the layers of substrate material may be made of another elastomeric material that is stiffer than the layers of elastomeric material. The shear spring may include an upper mounting plate configured to attached to the lower surface of the upper base plate, and a lower mounting plate configured to attached to the upper surface of the lower base plate.
In embodiments where the upper base plate and the lower base plate are rectangular-shaped, there may be four shear springs positioned near the corners of the upper and lower base plates. In such embodiments, two of the four shear springs may be positioned along one edge of the upper and lower base plates, and the other two shear springs may be positioned along the opposite edge of the upper and lower base plates. In other embodiments, the shear spring may have an arc shape that partially surrounds the disc bearing core, or may have a circular shape that surrounds the disc bearing core.
In many embodiments, the disc bearing core includes an upper disc bearing plate, a lower disc bearing plate, and an elastomeric disc pad coupled between the upper disc bearing plate and the lower disc bearing plate. In such embodiments, the disc bearing core may be fixed to the upper surface of the lower base plate, or may slide along the upper surface of the lower base plate. The disc bearing core may also sit in a recess formed in the upper surface of the lower base plate. In embodiments having a recess, the recess may be concaved to cause the disc bearing core to maintain a centralized position in the absence of an external lateral force. The disc bearing core may or may not include a shear pin at its center to prevent shearing of the disc bearing core. In many embodiments, the disc bearing core is configured to support all of a load on the seismic isolation bearing, and the shear spring is configured to not support any of the load. Alternatively, the shear spring may configured to support up to one third of a total load on the seismic isolation bearing.
In further embodiments, the upper base plate includes edges that extend toward the lower base plate to provide a partial enclosure for the disc bearing core and the shear spring. In such embodiments, the shear spring may be coupled to the lower surface of the upper base plate via the edges extending toward the lower base plate.
Another example embodiment includes a centrally-located, high-load, multi-rotational, sliding bearing (HLMRB), with a rubber shear spring (RSS) located at the isolator's periphery. The sliding HLMRB may be a disc bearing, though it can be composed of other HLMRB types (e.g., pot or spherical). This solves the problem of having to use a small, high pressure, sliding surface. A disc bearing works well due to its reliability and vertical vibration energy absorption capabilities. Vertical load is predominantly supported by the central sliding bearing, but the shear spring(s) may take a lesser portion of the total vertical load. This provides design flexibility in specifying the level of friction damping; the more load the sliding bearing supports the higher the friction damping. In this embodiment, horizontal restoring force is provided by the shear spring(s). In one embodiment, the isolation bearing can be designed such that the sliding bearing supports nearly all of the vertical load. In this case the shear spring(s) is freed from many of the constraints placed upon elastomeric bearings. For example, a very high damping compound can be used because vertical load creep is no longer an issue. Further, the shear spring's geometry can be changed without concern to its load carrying capability, and for cases where the isolation bearing may experience uplift, the shear spring(s) can be configured to optimize its design for tensile capacity (a load condition with which previous isolator designs struggle). The disc bearing core and shear spring(s) are integrated into a compact isolation bearing design so as to reduce the footprint of the bearing, overcoming previous design limitations of excessive size. In addition, a box housing enclosure may provide environmental protection for the sliding surface, serving as a way to transfer both the sliding and restoring forces to the superstructure.
In summary, the embodiments disclosed herein eliminate many of the shortcomings experienced in current large displacement isolator designs through the use of an integrated sliding bearing core with at least one shear spring as disclosed herein.
The foregoing will be apparent from the following more particular description of example embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating embodiments of the present invention.
A description of example embodiments of the invention follows.
The shear springs disclosed herein differ in a number of ways from standard steel reinforced elastomeric bearings (SREBs). Standard SREBs are used to support high vertical loads; thus, standard SREBs cannot be used to design the shear springs of the embodiments of the present invention. The present shear springs have an unusually-high aspect ratio (high rubber layer thickness) and type of elastomer. A high rubber thickness reduces the shape factor of the shear spring, which is the ratio of the loaded area (plan area) to the bulging area (elevation area) of the shear springs. In general, a high shape factor causes the rubber layer to be stiff in compression, which can be approximated by the equation EC=E·(1+a·S2), where EC is the compressive modulus of a single rubber layer, E a material constant, a is a constant related to both material and geometry, and S is the shape factor. The shape factor S may be represented by the equation S=B/4T, where B is the plan dimension and T is the thickness. The concept of a reduced vertical load on the present shear springs allows EC to be small, and it follows that S may be small as well, which allows the shear springs' layer thickness to be high. With such shear springs, even moderate displacements across the thick layers can cause the shear springs elastomer and shim (substrate) layers to rotate, bend, or yield. In a reinforced elastomeric bearing setting, this could lead to catastrophic failure, as the bearing could buckle in such a position. The embodiments of the present invention, however, use a centrally-located sliding bearing, which prevents such failure. Thus, the isolation bearing disclosed herein can use shear springs with a high elastomer thickness (reduced shape factor). Thus, the present shear springs are unencumbered by a vertical load support requirement and can, thus, be designed using unique materials and methods, performing in ways not possible with standard SREBs.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to example embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/852,584, filed on Mar. 18, 2013. The entire teachings of the above application are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3429622 | Lee et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
4117637 | Robinson | Oct 1978 | A |
4187573 | Fyfe et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4320549 | Greb | Mar 1982 | A |
4499694 | Buckle et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4593502 | Buckle | Jun 1986 | A |
4599834 | Fujimoto et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4644714 | Zayas | Feb 1987 | A |
5303524 | Caspe | Apr 1994 | A |
5461835 | Tarics | Oct 1995 | A |
5491937 | Watson et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5867951 | Yaguchi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6021992 | Yen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6107389 | Oishi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6126136 | Yen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160864 | Gou et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
8011142 | Marioni | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20030167707 | Tsai | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040045236 | Kim | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20060174555 | Zayas et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080098671 | Tsai | May 2008 | A1 |
20110016805 | Tsai | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000257670 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2012219570 | Nov 2012 | JP |
Entry |
---|
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/027470, Jul. 24, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/945,033, Jun. 16, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140270602 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61852584 | Mar 2013 | US |