This invention relates generally to electrostatic precipitators, and more specifically to techniques for improving the collection efficiency thereof.
Many industrial facilities require devices for limiting environmental emissions of particulate materials. A well-known device is the electrostatic precipitator. Electrostatic precipitators are commonly used in the electric utility industry at power production facilities (to limit emission of combustion by-products). Other examples of industries using electrostatic precipitators include those fabricating cement (dust), pulp and paper products (salt cake and lime dust), petrochemicals (for various mists), and steel (dust and fumes).
Electrostatic precipitators direct a stream of particle-laden gases through a collector chamber. The collector chamber contains electrodes that act as particle collectors. In a typical design, discharge electrodes are electrically insulated from the rest of the chamber and charged electrically. The electrical charge ionizes the suspended particles, causing them to move toward the collecting electrodes. A variety of collection devices may be employed to trap and remove the particles from the stream.
In the electrostatic precipitator, particles become negatively charged as a result of the negative discharge corona generated at the discharge electrode. The corona occurs when high voltage is applied to the discharge electrode. The precipitating process results from two simultaneous events: charging of the particles or co-mingling of the particles with other charged particles and attracting of charged particles under the applied electric field.
Electrostatic precipitators typically have a high efficiency rating. However, in some instances, electrostatic precipitators do not work as well as is desired. For example, electrostatic precipitators are not as effective with discharge streams having particles with a high electrical resistivity. Further challenges to the efficiency arise as users increase flow rates through the collection chamber in order to meet increased production (discharge) needs.
What is needed is a technique to improve the collection efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator. Preferably, this is accomplished through optimization of the discharge electrode geometry without increasing the available collecting plate area.
The above discussed and other drawbacks and deficiencies are overcome or alleviated by the teachings herein, wherein an improved electrostatic precipitator, a discharge electrode and a method are disclosed.
The discharge electrode for the electrostatic precipitator includes geometric features incorporated into the discharge electrode and adapted according to an algorithm for improving collection efficiency for particles by enhancing an electric field between the discharge electrode and a collection electrode of the electrostatic precipitator.
The method for producing a discharge electrode for an electrostatic precipitator includes stages for selecting an algorithm for evaluation of the collection efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator; and incorporating geometric features into the discharge electrode according to the algorithm, wherein the geometric features improve the collection efficiency by enhancing the charging and collecting electric field between the discharge electrode and the collection electrode of the electrostatic precipitator.
The electrostatic precipitator includes at least one discharge electrode having geometric features incorporated into the discharge electrode and adapted according to an algorithm for improving collection efficiency for particles by enhancing an electric field between the discharge electrode and the collection electrode of the electrostatic precipitator.
The above-discussed and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and drawings.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
Referring to
As used herein, the term “particles” refers to any material, or materials, entrained in a gas, fume or other media for which an electrostatic precipitator 10 may be used to reduce the concentrations thereof. Accordingly, as used herein, particles 7 should be considered to be a general and non-limiting term. For example, particles 7 maybe included in materials that might be classified as one of dust, fumes, gas and a mist.
In
Selecting dimensions of the pins 8 is one example of selecting physical aspects of the discharge electrode 6 in order to manipulate the electric field and thus improve the collection efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator 10. That is, when voltage is applied to the discharge electrode 6, the pins 8 provide for generation of an electric field having properties that result in improved collection efficiency. It should be noted that aside from the improving collection efficiency, this benefit does not require increasing the area of the collecting plates 4.
Aside from modifying aspects of the discharge electrode 6, a variety of dimensions may be modified to assist with improving the collection efficiency. Exemplary dimensions that may be varied include, without limitation, the distance between the stiffeners 2, (shown as D1 and referred to as the “stiffener spacing”); the gas passing width D3; the baffle spacing D2; and, the shape and size (including varying height and width ratios) of the stiffeners 2. Further aspects of the electrostatic precipitator 10 that may be varied include placement of features such as the stiffeners 2 in relation to the discharge electrode 6. In short, any other aspects of the geometry and relationships of features of the electrostatic precipitator 10 may be varied in conjunction with the design of the discharge electrode 6 to provide for improved collection efficiency.
In order to better characterize improvements to the collection efficiency, it is important to understand certain relationship. Increases in migration velocity result in large changes in the collection efficiency of the particles 7. This relationship is described by the algorithm given generally in Equation 1 (referred to as the “Deutsch Anderson” equation):
η=1−e(−A/Q)ω (Eq. 1)
wherein
Migration velocity is further defined as:
ω=(EoEpa)/(2πh) (Eq. 2)
wherein
Note that Equation 2 describes aspects of particle 7 migration in a uniform electric field. For cases of non-uniform electric fields, such as those encountered in a duct-type of electrostatic precipitator 10, Eo and Ep are defined according to Equation 3 and Equation 4, respectively.
Eo=Average(√{square root over (Ex2+Ey2+Ez2)}) (Eq. 3)
Ep=Average(√{square root over (Ex2+Ey2)}) (Eq. 4);
where, for small stiffeners 2,
Ep=Average(|Ey|) (Eq. 5);
wherein:
These relationships can be simplified and better understood, when considered in conjunction with the embodiment depicted in
In the embodiment depicted, each of the strips of metal 22 includes a small region that is referred to as the high field region 20. In this embodiment, the charging region 20 is the region where the electric field is typically higher than 30 kV/cm. Also depicted in
Referring also to
In some embodiments, the V-Pin electrode 11 is located about halfway between each discharge electrode 6, and about halfway between each stiffener 2, as depicted in
Referring also to
It should be noted that the V-Pin electrode 11 and the quad blade electrode 25 are only two of the many other embodiments for the discharge electrode 6. Other exemplary embodiments are depicted in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In summary, one can generally refer to these non-limiting examples of improved discharge electrodes 6 as having “features” that improve the particle 7 migration velocity (ω). As taught herein, these features provide for improved electric field properties across the migration space 21.
Accordingly, it should be obvious to one skilled in the art that the features may be attached to existing aspects of the discharge electrode 6 (for example, the round tube 18 as a retrofit to existing technology), may replace existing discharge electrodes 6 entirely (for example, during a system overhaul), or may be used in addition to existing discharge electrodes 6. Of course, design of the electrostatic precipitator 10 may take advantage of the teachings herein to provide for an improved electric field and, thus, modify other aspects of the electrostatic precipitator 10. For example, the size, shape and placement of the stiffeners 2 may be considered and designed to work in conjunction with the discharge electrode 6 incorporating such features.
Calculations performed in accordance with the techniques provided herein (Eq. 1) show that increasing the value of (Eo*Ep) will increase the migration velocity (ω). Using the techniques provided, one can see that the collection efficiency (η) is exponentially related to the migration velocity (ω). Data obtained in the laboratory has shown that significant increases in the value of (Eo*Ep) may be achieved for varying configurations. In particular, of the embodiments evaluated in the laboratory, it was noted that the quad blade electrode 25 provided for substantial improvements in collection efficiency (η). A summary of the results is provided in Table 1.
Note that in Table 1, the embodiment used in each case is signified by an alphabetic identification. That is, D indicates evaluation of the dual blade electrode 50, Q indicates evaluation of the quad blade electrode 25, and V indicates evaluation of the V-Pin electrode 11. O indicates evaluation of a standard (prior art) opposed pin discharge electrode. Note that in Table 1, a value of 1.00 for (Eo*Ep) indicates the case to which the remaining data was normalized for each size gas passage width, D3.
In each case, the maximum predicted value of (Eo*Ep) was associated with one of the dual blade electrode 50 or the quad blade electrode 25. Accordingly, the test data collected indicates that changing the configuration of the discharge electrode 6 increases migration velocity (ω) by a factor of two to three times nominal configurations.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the algorithm may be employed prospectively, such as during the design phase, or retrospectively, as in this case where testing of design was undertaken.
While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.