1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to computer network authentication services. Specifically, the invention relates to apparatus, methods, and systems for providing disconnected validation of login credentials.
2. Description of the Related Art
In recent years, computer networks have been increasingly significant in terms of the quantity and sensitivity of the data communicated. Once used primarily for academic purposes, the Internet has become a vehicle for communicating such confidential information as credit card transactions, bank account transactions, and corporate intellectual property. The same applies to proprietary corporate networks. As the quantity and value of the data being communicated has increased, the threats to the security of this data have increased proportionately.
One of the technologies developed to address data security threats is Kerberos authentication. Kerberos provides a means for secure authentication of a user's credentials as well as means to protect sensitive data communicated across an insecure network. Kerberos authentication relies on the existence of a Kerberos server that certifies a user's identity to network services utilized by an application the user is running. Services that use Kerberos to authenticate users are said to be “Kerberized.”
While the need for security has increased, so has the need for flexibility. Users are increasingly mobile and may access network services through a variety of locations and devices. Networks are increasing in size and complexity and are often in a state of flux and change. Such size and flexibility provides challenges to network security and reliability. For example, changes in policy or accounts must be effected across larger networks and a greater number of devices. Furthermore, an authentication server such as a Kerberos server may be temporarily inaccessible to some or all of a network resulting in a need for “disconnected” authentication of a user.
While various solutions for disconnected authentication have been developed, such solutions typically require at least one previous login by the user at a particular device at a time that the authentication server is accessible. Such a requirement is impractical given the sheer number of networked devices and the frequency of changes in network configuration and login accounts.
Given the issues and challenges related to providing authentication services and the shortcomings of currently available solutions, a need exists for an apparatus, method, and system to validate login credentials of a user or group member without requiring a previous login from a particular device or immediate access to an authentication server.
The present invention has been developed in response to the present state of the art, and in particular, in response to the problems and needs in the art that have not yet been fully solved by currently available authentication systems. Accordingly, the present invention has been developed to provide an apparatus, method, and system to validate login credentials without requiring a previous login via the login device or immediate access to an authentication server.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method to validate login credentials of a selected party includes authenticating a login device with an authentication service, obtaining a service ticket from the authentication service for the login device to communicate with the selected party (referred to herein as a user service ticket), and storing the user service ticket for subsequent authentication of the selected party by the login device. Authenticating the login device may include providing valid credentials and a valid timestamp to the authentication service. Tickets to communicate with one or more selected parties such as users or group members may be pre-fetched by the login device without requiring access to the credentials of the users or group members.
In another aspect of the present invention, an apparatus to validate login credentials includes a ticket pre-fetch module configured to authenticate a login device with an authentication service and obtain (i.e. pre-fetch) user service tickets from the authentication service for the login device to communicate with one or more selected parties such as users and group members. The apparatus may also include a ticket cache configured to store the pre-fetched tickets for subsequent authentication of the selected parties by the login device.
In certain embodiments, the apparatus also includes an authentication module configured to authenticate login credentials against pre-fetched tickets stored in the ticket cache. Login credentials may be received and validated by the authentication module despite unavailability of an authentication service. In certain embodiments, authenticating login credentials against a pre-fetched user service ticket includes generating a key from the login credentials and decrypting a portion of the pre-fetched user service ticket using the generated key. Furthermore, authentication data within the pre-fetched user service ticket may be compared with known data to confirm the validity of the pre-fetched user service ticket. In one embodiment, authenticating a party against a pre-fetched user service ticket may occur by using a pre-fetched user service ticket corresponding to the selected party to construct a Kerberos AP-REQ message structure and invoking a validation function that processes the Kerberos AP-REQ message structure.
In one embodiment, a list of users and/or groups is retrieved from a known source such as a configuration file and user service tickets to communicate with each user and group member are pre-fetched and stored in the ticket cache associated with the login device. The pre-fetched user service tickets may also be refreshed within the ticket cache as need by obtaining new user service tickets from the authentication service. Refreshing the user service tickets may keep the ticket cache better synchronized with changes in user credentials registered with the authentication server. In one embodiment, pre-fetched user service tickets may be refreshed in response to selected events such as expiration of a selected interval, a login request, a change in user credentials, and a reboot cycle.
In another aspect of the present invention, a system to validate login credentials includes an authentication server configured to provide an authentication service, and a login device comprising the ticket pre-fetch module, the authentication module, and the ticket cache previously described. The authentication server may be a domain controller. In one embodiment, the authentication server is a Kerberos key distribution center (KDC) and the pre-fetched user service tickets may be Kerberos service tickets.
The present invention advantageously facilitates disconnected authentication of login credentials without requiring a previous login session. It should be noted that reference throughout this specification to features, advantages, or similar language does not imply that all of the features and advantages that may be realized with the present invention should be or are in any single embodiment of the invention. Rather, language referring to the features and advantages is understood to mean that a specific feature, advantage, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, discussion of the features and advantages, and similar language, throughout this specification may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same embodiment.
Furthermore, the described features, advantages, and characteristics of the invention may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific features or advantages of a particular embodiment. In other instances, additional features and advantages may be recognized in certain embodiments that may not be present in all embodiments of the invention.
In order that the advantages of the invention will be readily understood, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the invention will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings, in which:
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the Figures herein, may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the apparatus, method, and system of the present invention, as represented in
Many of the functional units described in this specification have been labeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize their implementation independence. For example, a module may be implemented as a hardware circuit comprising custom VLSI circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such as logic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module may also be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as field programmable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logic devices or the like.
Modules may also be implemented in software for execution by various types of processors. An identified module of executable code may, for instance, comprise one or more physical or logical blocks of computer instructions which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, or function. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need not be physically located together, but may comprise disparate instructions stored in different locations which, when joined logically together, comprise the module and achieve the stated purpose for the module.
Indeed, a module of executable code could be a single instruction, or many instructions, and may even be distributed over several different code segments, among different programs, and across several memory devices. Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated herein within modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organized within any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may be collected as a single data set, or may be distributed over different locations including over different storage devices, and may exist, at least partially, merely as electronic signals on a system or network.
In the following description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of programming, software modules, user selections, network transactions, database queries, database structures, hardware modules, hardware circuits, hardware chips, etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
The features, structures, or characteristics of the invention described throughout this specification may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. For example, reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” or similar language throughout this specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment and the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
The present invention sets forth an apparatus, system and method to validate credentials provided to a login device without requiring immediate connectivity to an authentication server or a previous login on the login device.
The application server 120 may include a login service 150 with an authentication module 160. In the depicted embodiment, the application server 120 is configured to facilitate authentication of users and group members. In one embodiment, the authentication module 160 is a pluggable authentication module. The authentication module may receive one or more credentials such as a username and password from the user 105 via the client 110. Alternately, the user 105 may be stationed at the application server 120 and directly provide the credentials 112 to the login service 150 and the authentication module 160.
In response to the received credentials 112, the authentication module 160 may provide an authentication request 162 to the authentication server 130. In one embodiment, the authentication server 130 is a Kerberos server that may function as a domain controller such as a Windows™ domain controller. In the depicted embodiment, the authentication server 130 includes an authentication service 170, and a ticket granting service 180.
The authentication service 170 may receive the authentication request 162, for example a Kerberos AS_REQ message, and provide an authentication reply 172 such as a Kerberos AS_REP message. In response, the authentication module 160 may use the authentication reply 172 to determine the authenticity of the user provided credentials 112. In one embodiment, the authentication module 160 derives a key (not shown) from the credentials 112 which is used to decrypt a portion of the AS_REP message. If the decryption is successful, the credentials 112 provided by the user 105 are known to be valid.
In response to successful validation, the application server 120 may generate a service ticket request 164 and receive a ticket reply 182 from the ticket granting service 180 running on the authentication server 130. In certain embodiments, the ticket reply 182 includes a service ticket 192 to be presented to a particular service provider 140. Specifically, the service ticket 192 may enable a user or group member to request services of the service provider 140. In response, to proper presentation of the service ticket 192, the service provider 140 and the application server 120 may securely exchange service data 194.
The depicted login service 310 includes a ticket pre-fetch module 320, an authentication module 330, a ticket cache 340, and a configuration file 350. Rather than obtaining service tickets for a user to communicate with a service provider as commonly done in the prior art, the ticket pre-fetch module 320 may pre-fetch one or more user service tickets (not shown) for a login device 110 or 120 to communicate with particular users or group members. In one embodiment, the ticket pre-fetch module 320 retrieves a pre-fetch list (not shown) from a known source such as the configuration file 350 and obtains user service tickets for the login device 120 to communicate with the users and group members referenced in the pre-fetch list.
It should be noted that the phrase “user service ticket” as used herein and subsequently shown in
The ticket pre-fetch module 320 may store the pre-fetched user service tickets (not shown) within the ticket cache 340. The pre-fetched user service tickets may also be refreshed within the ticket cache as need by obtaining a new user service tickets from the authentication service. In one embodiment, pre-fetched tickets are refreshed in response to selected events such as expiration of a selected interval, a login request, and a reboot cycle.
In response to a login request, the authentication module 330 may access the ticket cache 340 and authenticate a user or group member against a pre-fetched user service ticket—particularly if the authentication server 130 is unavailable or inaccessible.
Authenticating 410 a login device may include sending an authentication request 162 (see
Obtaining 430 one or more pre-fetched user service tickets may include sending one or more ticket requests 164 for the login device 110 or 120 to communicate with each user or group member and receiving a ticket reply 182 for each user or group member with a user service ticket encapsulated therein. Storing 440 the pre-fetched user service tickets for subsequent validation login credentials may include storing the pre-fetched user service tickets in the ticket cache 340.
Using the user service ticket in the described manner defers the need (for the login service 310 or the like) to know the login credentials of “User1” at the time the user service ticket 500 is issued. However, an encrypted part 510 of the user service ticket 500 may only be decrypted with a key derived from valid login credentials for “User1” thus facilitating authentication of the login credentials (by the login service 310 or the like) at a subsequent time such as in response to a login request.
Receiving 610 one or more login credentials may include receiving a username and password from a user attempting to login on a device such as a computer or a mobile device. Testing 615 if an authentication service is available may include attempting to locate a particular authentication server associated with the login device or testing for a timeout condition on an authentication request. In one embodiment, the authentication server is a Kerberos authentication server and a Kerberos ticket granting server such as the server 130 shown in
Authenticating 620 the user if the authentication service is available may include communicating with the authentication server in a manner previously described in the description of
If the authentication service is unavailable, the depicted method 600 may generate 630 a key from the user's login credentials and decrypt 640 (a portion of) a stored user service ticket using a key generated from the user's login credentials. Furthermore, authentication data within the pre-fetched user service ticket may be compared with known data to confirm the validity of the pre-fetched ticket. Consequently, a user or group member may be authenticated regardless of the immediate availability of an authentication server.
Subsequent to executing steps 620 or 640, the depicted method continues by testing 645 if the login credentials were valid and approving 650 or denying 660 the login attempt. Subsequently, the method ends 670.
The present invention facilitates disconnected authentication of users without requiring a previous login. The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its spirit or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. All changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4109237 | Hill | Aug 1978 | A |
4370707 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4694397 | Grant | Sep 1987 | A |
5222018 | Sharpe et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5267865 | Lee et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5302132 | Corder | Apr 1994 | A |
5310349 | Daniels et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313465 | Perlman et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333302 | Hensley et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5339435 | Lubkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5367698 | Webber et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371852 | Attanasio et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5387104 | Corder | Feb 1995 | A |
5410703 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5423032 | Byrd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437027 | Bannon et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5437555 | Ziv-el | Aug 1995 | A |
5440719 | Hanes et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441415 | Lee et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5497486 | Stolfo et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5497492 | Zbikowski et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499379 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5530829 | Beardsley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5550968 | Miller et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550976 | Henderson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553291 | Tanaka et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5586304 | Stupek, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590360 | Edwards | Dec 1996 | A |
5600833 | Senn et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608874 | Ogawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5608903 | Prasad et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613090 | Willems | Mar 1997 | A |
5623601 | Vu | Apr 1997 | A |
5630069 | Flores et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630131 | Palevich et al. | May 1997 | A |
5659735 | Parrish et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659736 | Hasegawa et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666502 | Capps et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671428 | Muranaga et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673386 | Batra | Sep 1997 | A |
5673387 | Chen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675782 | Montague et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5677997 | Talatik | Oct 1997 | A |
5680586 | Elkins et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684950 | Dare et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692132 | Hogan | Nov 1997 | A |
5692902 | Aeby | Dec 1997 | A |
5694540 | Humelsine et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706502 | Foley et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708812 | Van Dyke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5708828 | Coleman | Jan 1998 | A |
5710884 | Dedrick | Jan 1998 | A |
5711671 | Geeslin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5727145 | Nessett et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727951 | Ho et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740427 | Stoller et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5743746 | Ho et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745113 | Jordan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745902 | Miller et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752042 | Cole et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754173 | Hiura et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754938 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758062 | Mcmahon et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758074 | Marlin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758344 | Prasad et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764897 | Khalidi | Jun 1998 | A |
5765140 | Knudson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768519 | Swift et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774551 | Wu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778169 | Reinhardt | Jul 1998 | A |
5784553 | Kolawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784643 | Shields | Jul 1998 | A |
5790801 | Funato | Aug 1998 | A |
5796393 | Macnaughton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806075 | Jain et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812669 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812865 | Theimer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815657 | Williams et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819265 | Ravin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819281 | Cummins | Oct 1998 | A |
5819295 | Nakagawa et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822518 | Ooki et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835087 | Herz et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835911 | Nakagawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838918 | Prager et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844508 | Murashita et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5859972 | Subramaniam et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872928 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5878432 | Misheski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889520 | Glaser | Mar 1999 | A |
5890161 | Helland et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890175 | Wong et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892898 | Fujii et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893074 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893076 | Hafner et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893916 | Dooley | Apr 1999 | A |
5930512 | Boden et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937165 | Schwaller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948064 | Bertram et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949419 | Domine et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956732 | Tsuchida | Sep 1999 | A |
5956736 | Hanson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960200 | Eager et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968176 | Nessett et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987247 | Lau | Nov 1999 | A |
5995114 | Wegman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002868 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003047 | Osmond et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014669 | Slaughter et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014712 | Islam et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016495 | Mckeehan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016501 | Martin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021496 | Dutcher et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029178 | Martin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029195 | Herz | Feb 2000 | A |
6029247 | Ferguson | Feb 2000 | A |
6035323 | Narayen et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041344 | Bodamer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044368 | Powers | Mar 2000 | A |
6044465 | Dutcher et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049822 | Mittal | Apr 2000 | A |
6052512 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055538 | Kessenich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058260 | Brockel et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058379 | Odom et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061643 | Walker et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061650 | Malkin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067568 | Li et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070184 | Blount et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076166 | Moshfeghi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079020 | Liu | Jun 2000 | A |
6092199 | Dutcher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101481 | Miller | Aug 2000 | A |
6101503 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108649 | Young et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108670 | Weida et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112228 | Earl et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112240 | Pogue et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115040 | Bladow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6115544 | Mueller | Sep 2000 | A |
6134548 | Gottsman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138086 | Rose et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141006 | Knowlton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141010 | Hoyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6141647 | Meijer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151600 | Dedrick | Nov 2000 | A |
6151610 | Senn et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161176 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167445 | Gai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167564 | Fontana et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170009 | Mandal et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182212 | Atkins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182226 | Reid et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185625 | Tso et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195794 | Buxton | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199068 | Carpenter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199079 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205480 | Broadhurst et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208345 | Sheard et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209000 | Klein et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209033 | Datta et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222535 | Hurd, II | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223221 | Kunz | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226649 | Bodamer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230160 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230184 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230309 | Turner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233584 | Purcell | May 2001 | B1 |
6237114 | Wookey et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246410 | Bergeron et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249905 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256637 | Venkatesh et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256659 | Mclain, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256678 | Traughber et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260068 | Zalewski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263352 | Cohen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266666 | Ireland et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269405 | Dutcher et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269406 | Dutcher et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272673 | Dale et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272678 | Imachi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279030 | Britton et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282576 | Lane | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282605 | Moore | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286028 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286104 | Buhle et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301601 | Helland et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304893 | Gish | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308164 | Nummelin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308188 | Bernardo et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308273 | Goertzel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6313835 | Gever et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314434 | Shigemi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327677 | Garg et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330566 | Durham | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336118 | Hammond | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341287 | Sziklai et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345239 | Bowman-amuah | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349287 | Hayashi | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363398 | Andersen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370573 | Bowman-Amuah | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370646 | Goodman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381579 | Gervais et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389589 | Mishra et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401085 | Gershman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6401211 | Brezak et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405364 | Bowman-amuah | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430556 | Goldberg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438514 | Hill et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442620 | Thatte et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446096 | Holland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453317 | Lacost et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457130 | Hitz et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6466932 | Dennis et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469713 | Hetherington et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496847 | Bugnion et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567818 | Frey et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6587876 | Mahon et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615258 | Barry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625622 | Henrickson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6658625 | Allen | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678714 | Olapurath et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6715128 | Hirashima et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6728877 | Mackin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735691 | Capps et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757696 | Multer et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760761 | Sciacca | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795835 | Ricart et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801946 | Child et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6817017 | Goodman | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839766 | Parnafes et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6880005 | Bell et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6925477 | Champagne et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938158 | Azuma | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941465 | Palekar et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944183 | Iyer et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950818 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950935 | Allavarpu et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6968370 | Wu | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973488 | Yavatkar et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7028079 | Mastrianni et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7062781 | Shambroom | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080077 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089584 | Sharma | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7100195 | Underwood | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7117486 | Wong et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133984 | Dickensheets | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7139973 | Kirkwood et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143095 | Barrett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162640 | Heath et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7171458 | Brown et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185073 | Gai et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7209970 | Everson et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7213266 | Maher et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7216181 | Jannu et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7231460 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7234157 | Childs et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7243370 | Bobde et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7284043 | Feinleib et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7299504 | Tiller et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7346766 | Mackin et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7356601 | Clymer et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356816 | Goodman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7379996 | Papatla et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7392390 | Newcombe | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7418597 | Thornton et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421555 | Dorey | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7426642 | Aupperle et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428583 | Lortz et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7440962 | Wong et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7444401 | Keyghobad et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7467141 | Steele et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7478418 | Supramaniam et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483979 | Prager | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7487535 | Isaacson et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7519813 | Cox et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7584502 | Alkove et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7591005 | Moore | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7617501 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7650496 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7650497 | Thornton et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653794 | Michael et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7661027 | Langen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673323 | Moriconi | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7690025 | Grewal et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7765187 | Bergant et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7805721 | Feinleib et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7895332 | Vanyukhin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7904949 | Bowers et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7987455 | Senner et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8024360 | Moore | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8086710 | Vanyukhin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8087075 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8141138 | Bhatia et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8245242 | Peterson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8346908 | Vanyukhin et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8429712 | Robinson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010034733 | Prompt et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020055949 | Shiomi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078005 | Shi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112178 | Scherr | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129274 | Baskey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133723 | Tait | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138572 | Delany et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020169986 | Lortz | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169988 | Vandergeest et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174366 | Peterka et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178377 | Hemsath et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184536 | Flavin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009487 | Prabakaran et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018913 | Brezak et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023587 | Dennis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028611 | Kenny et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033535 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065940 | Brezak et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065942 | Lineman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110397 | Supramaniam et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115186 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115313 | Kanada et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115439 | Mahalingam et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149781 | Yared et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177388 | Botz et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188036 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030229783 | Hardt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010519 | Sinn et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040059953 | Purnell | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078569 | Hotti | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088543 | Garg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098595 | Aupperle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098615 | Mowers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111515 | Manion et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111643 | Farmer | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117382 | Houseknecht et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123146 | Himmel et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128542 | Blakley et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139050 | Barrett et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139081 | Barrett et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199795 | Grewal et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040226027 | Winter | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260565 | Zimniewicz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260651 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010547 | Carinci et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044409 | Betz et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055357 | Campbell | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060397 | Barthram et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086457 | Hohman | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091068 | Ramamoorthy et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091213 | Schutz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091250 | Dunn et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091284 | Weissman et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091290 | Cameron et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108579 | Isaacson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114701 | Atkins et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050125798 | Peterson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144463 | Rossebo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050193181 | Kaneda et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198303 | Knauerhase et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204143 | Ellington | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223216 | Chan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246554 | Batson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050267938 | Czeczulin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050268309 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283443 | Hardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283614 | Hardt | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004794 | Pizzo et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060005229 | Palekar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010445 | Peterson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060015353 | Reese | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060021017 | Hinton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026195 | Gu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034494 | Holloran | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085483 | Mooney et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116949 | Wehunt et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060130065 | Chin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060161435 | Atef et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174350 | Roever et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184401 | DelGaudio et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200424 | Cameron et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060200504 | Lo | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224611 | Dunn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248099 | Barrett et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265740 | Clark et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282360 | Kahn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282461 | Marinescu | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294151 | Wong et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011136 | Haskin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070038596 | Pizzo et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083917 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100980 | Kataoka et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101415 | Masui | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143430 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143836 | Bowers et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150448 | Patnode | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156766 | Hoang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156767 | Hoang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180448 | Low et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070180493 | Croft et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192843 | Peterson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070255814 | Green et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288992 | Robinson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080104220 | Vanyukhin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104250 | Vanyukhin | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133533 | Ganugapati et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162604 | Soulet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080215867 | Mackin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090006537 | Palekar et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090216975 | Halperin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100050232 | Peterson | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110093570 | Mackin et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110282977 | Peterson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283273 | Peterson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120192256 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215899 | Peterson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120297035 | Peterson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 932 279 | Jun 2008 | EP |
WO 2006016900 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2007044613 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bellavista, P.; Corradi, A.; Stefanelli, C. A Mobile Agent Infrastructure for Terminal, User, and Resource Mobility. IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. Pub. Date: 2000. Relevant pp. 877-890. Found on the World Wide Web at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=830435. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,814, filed Aug. 28, 2008, Eyes et al. |
“Description of Digital Certificates”, Jan. 23, 2007, http://www.support.microsoft.com/kb/195724. |
“Directory Administrator”, http://diradmin.open-it.org/indexlphp, p. 1-3. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Innovation Report—Windows Group Policy Protocols”. Jul. 31, 2006. |
“Kerberos Module for Apache”, http://modauthkerb.sourceforge.net/, Feb. 6, 2012. |
“LDAP Linux HOWTO”, http://tldp/org/HOWTO/LDAP-HOWTO/, p. 1-2. Mar. 5, 2004. |
“Lnux Authentication Against Active Directory”, http://laaad/sourceforge.netlen/home/htm, p. 1-2. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“NegotiateAuth”, http://negotiateauth,mozdev.org/ Jul. 8, 2010. |
“Optimization Techniques for Trusted Semantic Interoperation”, Final Technical Report, Air Force Research Laboratory. Published May 1998. |
“Project: AD4Unix: Summary”, http://sourceforge.netlprojects/adunixl, p. 1-3. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Replacing NIS with Kerberos and LDAP”, http://ofb.netHhess/krbldap/, p. 1-2. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Sadma”, http://sadmas.sourceforge.netlen/indexlhtml. p. 1-2. Dec. 15, 2004. |
“Sun Enterprise Authentication Mechanism Data Sheet”, http://wwws.sun.com/jsp—utils/Printpage.jsp?url, pp. 1-4. Dec. 15, 2004. |
Vintela Extends the Reach of Microsoft Group Policy to Unix and Linux; Vintela Group Policy (VGP) Provides a Framework for Unix and Linux Policy-Based Management Through the Popular Windows Group Policy System., PR Newswire, Sep. 13, 2004. |
Oct. 26, 2011—U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458—Office Action—Transmittal of Communications to Third Party Requester Inter Partes Reexamination, 52 pages. |
Nov. 18, 2011—U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458—Patent Owner Comments Regarding Oct. 20, 2011 Action Closing Prosecution, 14 pages. |
A. Leonard, “Embrace, extend, censor”, Originally published May 11, 2000 on salon.com, http://archive.salon.com/tech/log/2000/05/11/slashdot—censor/. |
Accelerated Examination Support Document in newly filed application, Feb. 3, 2012. |
Affidavit filed with Amendment and Response to Office Action filed Jan. 14, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/888,845. |
AIX 5L Differences Guide Version 5.2 Edition Published Dec. 24, 2002, Excerpt http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/073842704 7/ch091ev1sec13. |
Akhgar et al., Secure ICT Services for Mobile and Wireless Communications: A Federated Global Identity Management Framework, 2006 IEEE. |
Alan H. Harbitter et al., “Performance of Public-Key-Enabled Kerberos Authentication in Large Networks”, Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on Security and Privacy. 2001. |
Amendment and Response to Office Action filed on Jan. 14, 2008 with claims as amended in U.S. Appl. No. 10/888,845. |
Antti Tikkanen, “Active Directory and nss—idap for Linux: Centralized er Management,” printed from http://www.hut.fi/cc/docskerberos/nss—Idap/htm, pp. 1-11, 2004. |
Apurva Kumar, “The OpenLDAP Proxy Cache,” IBM, India Research Lab, at least as early as May 2003. |
Buell, D.A. et al., “Identity management”, Internet Computing, IEEEVolume 7, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003 pp. 26-28. |
Centrify Corporation's Answer and Affirmative Defenses, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc. Case No. 2:10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Jan. 17, 2011. |
Chapter 9 Authentication Protocols, Distributed System & Network Security Lab, Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, pp. 21-22. 1991. |
Complaint, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Oct. 21, 2010. |
COSuser—Identity management and user provisioning for Unix, Linux and Microsoft Windows® http://www.cosuser.com/ May 24, 2010. |
Damiani, E., et al, “Managing multiple and dependable identities” Internet Computing, IEEEVolume 7, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 2003 pp. 29-37. |
David “Del” Elson, “Active Directory and Linux,” printed from http://www.securityfoc.com/printable/infoc /1563, pp. 1-11, 2002. |
David F. Carr, “What's Federated Identity Management?”, eWeek, Nov. 10, 2003, http://www.eweek.com/printarticle/O,1761.a-111811,00.asp. |
Declaration of Matthew Peterson in Support of Quest's Opposition to Centrify's Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Jan. 17, 2011. |
Dennis, Disconnect Login (Was: FC3 Bug Week—Help Wanted) (Sep. 24, 2004). http:/markmail.org/message/cd462ufl2baup3yz. |
Description of Digital Certificates, Jan. 23, 2007, available at http://www.support.microsoft.com/kb/195724. |
Designing Network Security Published May 7, 1999. Excerpt http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/1578700434/ch02lev1sec1. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, Installation Guide: http://web.mit.edu/Kerberos/krb5-1.6/krb5-1.6/doc/krb5-install.html. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, Installation Guide: http://web.mit.edu/Kerberoslkrb5-1.3/krb5-1.3/doc/krb5-install.html—System Administrator's Guide: http://web.mit.edu/Kerberos/krb5-1.3/krb5-1.3/doc/krb5-admin.html—UNIX User's Guide: http://web.mit.edu/Kerberos/krb5-1.3/krb5-1.3/doc/krb5- er.html. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, System Administrator's Guide: http://web.mit.edu/Kerberos/krb5-1.6/krb5-1.6/doc/krb5-admin.html. |
Documentation for Kerberos V5 release krb5-1.3, Copyright 1985-2002, UNIX User's Guide: http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/www/krb5-1.2/krb5-1.2.6/doc/user-guide.html. |
European Office Action, Application No. 05728119.8-1243 dated Apr. 9, 2009. |
European Patent Office Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Apr. 9, 2009. |
Fabini et al., “IMS in a Bottle: Initial Experiences from an OpenSER-based Prototype Implementation of the 3GPP IP Multimedia Subsystem” Mobile Business, 2006. ICMB '06. International Conference on Publication Date: 2006; On pp. 13-13. |
Garman, “Kerberos—The Definitive Guide,” Aug. 2003, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. |
Get to One Options for moving from multiple, Unix identities to a single, AD-based authentication infrastructure with Vintela Authentication Serviceshttp://www.quest.com/Vintela—Authentication—Services/migration—options—VAS.aspx May 24, 2010. |
Hank Simon, “SAML:The Secret to Centralized Identity Management”, Dec. 2004, http://intelligententerprise.com/showArticle.jhtml?articlelD=54200324. |
Identity Management for UNIX http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsServer/en/library/ab66b7d2-9cfb-4d76-b707-30a5e0dd84f31033.mspx?mfr=true Aug. 22, 2005. |
Implementing Registry-Based Group Policy for Applications, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server. White Paper. 2000. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2006/039302, mailed on Apr. 2, 2009, in 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Appl. No. PCT/US2009/038394, mailed Oct. 6, 2009, in 13 pages. |
International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/US2006/039302, mailed on Jul. 3, 2008. |
International Search Report PCT/US2005/008342 , mailed on Nov. 9, 2006. |
Introduction to Group Policy in Windows Server 2003, Microsoft Corporation, Published Apr. 2003. |
J. Barr, “The Gates of Hades: Microsoft attempts to co-opt Kerberos”, Published Apr. 2000 as verified by the Internet Archive, http://web.archive.org/web/20000619011652/http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-2000-04/lw-04-vcontrol—3.html |
J. Brezak, “HTTP Authentication: SPNEGO Access Authentication as Implemented in Microsoft Windows 2000,” http://Meta.cesnet.cz/cms/opencms/en/docs/software/devel/draft-brezek-spneg-http-.04.xt, pp. 1-6. 2002. |
J. Kohl et al. “RFC 1510: The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)”, Published Sep. 1993, http://ietfreport.isoc.org/rfc/PDF/rfc1510.pdf. |
Jan De Clercq, “Win.NET Server Kerberos”, http://www.winnetmag.com/WindowsSecurity/ ArticlesIArticleID/26450/pg/3/3.html. Sep. 17, 2002. |
John Brezak, “Interoperability with Microsoft Windows 2000 Active Directory and Kerberos Services,” printed from http://msdn.microsft.com/library/en- /dnactdir/html/kerberossamp.asp.?frame.=true, pp. 1-4, 2000. |
Kerberos, PACs, and Microsoft's Dirty Tricks Originally posted to slashdot.org on May 2, 2000, http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5268&threshold=1&commentsort=O&mode=thread&cid=1096250. |
Langella, S. et al., “Dorian: Grid Service Infrastructure for Identity Management and Federation”, Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2006. CBMS 2006. 19th IEEE International Symposium on Jun. 22-23, 2006 pp. 756-761. |
Li, M., et al., “Identity management in vertical handovers for UMTS-WLAN networks”, Mobile Business, 2005. ICMB 2005. International Conference on Jul. 11-13, 2005 pp. 479-484. |
Likewise Software, Inc.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Jan. 17, 2011. |
LinuX® and Windows® Interoperability Guide, Published Dec. 14, 2001, Excerpt http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/0130324779/ch 18/lev1sec3. |
Lowe-Norris, Alistair G., Windows 2000 Active Directory, Chapters 8 and 9, pp. 177-245, Jan. 2000. |
Matsunaga et al, “Secure Authentication System for Public WLAN Roaming, Proceedings of the 1st. ACM international workshop on Wireless mobile applications and services on WLAN hotspots, ” San Diego, CA, A, Year of Publication: 2003, p. 113-121. |
Matthew Hur, “Session Code: ARC241 architecture & infrastructure”, Microsoft Corporation. Oct. 26, 2003. |
MCSE in a Nutshell: The Windows 2000 Exams Published Feb. 2001. Excerpt http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/0596000308/mcseian-CHP-13-SECT-1. |
Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Defendant Centrify Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue and Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reexamination, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc. Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Mar. 21, 2011. |
Memorandum in Support of Centrify's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reexamination, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc.,Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division , Jan. 26, 2011. |
Microsoft Corp., Implementing Registry-Based Group Policy for Applications, 2000. |
Microsoft Corp., Introduction to Group Policy in Windows Server 2003. |
Microsoft: CATIA Migration from UNIX to Windows, Overview, Jul. 18, 2003. (3 pages). |
Microsoft: CATIA Migration from UNIX to Windows, Overview, Jul. 18, 2003, Microsoft, Chapter 8, Windows-Unix Interoperability and Data Sharing. (21 pages). |
Mikkonen, H. et al., “Federated Identity Management for Grids” Networking and Services, 2006. ICNS '06. International conference on Jul. 16-18, 2006 pp. 69-69. |
Mont, M.C. et al., “Towards accountable management of identity and privacy: sticky policies and enforceable tracing services”, Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003. Proceedings. 14th International Workshop on Sep. 1-5, 2003 pp. 377-382. |
NCSA Introduction to Kerberos 5, All right reserved Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Page last updated May 21, 2002 http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/UserInfo/Resources/Sofiware/kerberosold/introduction.html. |
Neuman et al., “RFC 4120—The Kerberos Network Authentication Service V5,” Network Working Group, Jul. 2005. |
Neuman, et al.: “Kerberos: An Authentication Service for Computer Networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 32, Issue 9, Pub. Date Sep. 1994, relevant pp. 33-38. |
PADL Software Pty Ltd., http://www.padl.com/productsIXAD.html, pp. 1-3. Dec. 15, 2004. |
PADL Software Pty Ltd., Pam—ccreds readme, (Apr. 11, 2004) (pan—crreds) http://web.archive.org/web/20040411154827/htt;://www.padl.com/OSS/pam—ccreds.html. |
Phiri, J. et al., “Modelling and Information Fusion in Digital Identity Management Systems” Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies, 2006. ICN/ICONS/MCL 2006. International Conference on Apr. 23-29, 2006 pp. 181-181. |
Quest Software, Inc.'s Opposition to Motion to Stay, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Feb. 14, 2011. |
Quest Software; “UNIX Identity Migration Wizard User Guide”, 2006. |
Quest Vintela Authentication Services Administrator's Guide Version 3.1, Sep. 2006. |
Radeke, E., et al. “Framework for object migration in federated database systems”, Cooperation Univ. of Paderborn, Germany, Parallel and Distributed Information Systems, 1994., Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Publication Date: Sep. 28-30, 1994, On pp. 187-194. |
Reply Memorandum in Support of Centrify's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Reexamination, Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2:10-cv-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, Mar. 3, 2011. |
Request for Withdrawal of the European Application No. 05728119.8 on Feb. 19, 2010. |
Response to Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EOC filed Sep. 9, 2009 in EP 05728119.8. |
RFC 4120—“The Kerberos Network Authentication Service V5,” Neuman et al., Network Working Group, Jul. 2005. |
Sandrasegaran, Hsang, Identity Management in Vertical Handovers for UMTS-WLAN Networks, 2005 IEEE. |
Search Security, “Search Security.com Definitions”, Jun. 4, 2007, http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14—gci212437,00.html. |
Shim, S.S.Y et al., “Federated identity management” Computer; vol. 38, Issue 12, Dec. 2005 pp. 120-122. |
Shin, D. et al., “Ensuring information assurance in federated identity management”, Performance, Computing, and Communications, 2004 IEEE International Conference on 2004 pp. 821-826. |
Siddiqi, J. et al., “Secure ICT Services for Mobile and Wireless Communications: A Federated Global Identity Management Framework”, Information Technology: New Generations, 2006. ITNG 2006. Third International Conference on Apr. 10-12, 2006 pp. 351-357. |
Sixto Ortiz, Jr., “One-Time Password Technology”, vol. 29, Issue 15, Apr. 13, 2007, http://www. processor.com/editorial/article.asp?article=articles%2Fp2915%2F30p15%2F30p15.asp. |
Stipulated Judgment and Entry of Permanent Injunction against Likewise Software, Inc., Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No.,2:,10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division , May 23, 2011. |
Subject 2.15. What do I need to do to setup cross-realm authentication?, http://www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil/CCS/people/kenh/kerberos-fag. html. Jul. 8, 2010. |
Summary of telephonic interview involving co-inventor Matthew Peterson and three others plus the Examine on Nov. 16, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/888,845. |
The SLAPD and SLURPD Administrator's Guide, University of Michigan Release 3.3 Apr. 30, 1996, available at http://www.umich.edu/˜dirsvcs/Idap/doc/guides/slapd/guide.pdf. |
Transcript of Jul. 22, 2011 deposition of Michael W. Dennis in Quest Software, Inc. v. Centrify Corporation and Likewise Software, Inc., Case No. 2: 10-CV-00859-TS, United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division. |
Turbo Fredriksson, “LDAPv3.” printed from http://www.bayour.com/LDAPv3-HOWTO.html, pp. 2-65, 2001. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/311,215, Amendment and Response to Office Action filed Jun. 14, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/311,215, Claims in “red-line” form as amended by the applicant which with the amendments by the Examiner resulted in the issuance of the Notice of Allowance, Feb. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/311,215, Claims in “red-line” form as amended by the Examiner resulted in the issuance of the Notice of Allowance, Feb. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Inter Partes Reexamination Office Action, dated Jan. 21, 2011 of co-owned U.S. Patent No. 7,617,501. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Inter Partes Reexamination Request of co-owned U.S. Patent No. 7,617,501, Jan. 21, 2011. |
Vintela Group Policy Technology Preview, “Extending the Power of Group Policy and Windonws Active Directory to configuration of Unix and Linux users and systems”, Version 0.1, May 2004. |
Wedgetail Communications; “Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)”, 2004. |
Weitzner, D.J., “In Search of Manageable Identity Systems”, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 10, Issue 6, Nov.-Dec. 2006 pp. 84-86. |
Windows 2000 Kerberos Authentication White Paper, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, pp. 1-5 and 41-42. Jul. 12, 2010. |
Withers, Integrating Windows 2000 and UNIX Using Kerberos, The Journal for UNIX Systems Administrators, vol. 10, No. 12, Dec. 2001. http://seann.herdejurgen.com/resume/samag.com/html/v10/il2/a5.htm. |
Aelita Software Domain Migration Wizard 6.0 User's Guide, Aug. 21, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887 Petition to Reconsider Denial of Request for Inter Partes Reexamination filed Oct. 2, 2012. |
Authentication, from Pieces of the Puzzle, Chapter 2, p. 12. (Exhibit IV to U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination Renewed Petition (Third Party Requester to Response to Mar. 1, 2012 Office Action), dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
Centrify DirectControl Administrator's Guide Version 2.0, Aug. 15, 2005. |
Claim Chart, Claim 1 vs. Hemsath et al., Garman and Withers (Exhibit II to U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination Renewed Petition (Third Party Requester to Response to Mar. 1, 2012 Office Action), dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
Declaration of Ethan L. Miller, Ph.D. (Exh. I, to Inter Partes Reexam), dated Aug. 30, 2012. |
Declaration of Nicholas Webb, dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
IBM SecureWay Policy Director, 1999. (4 pages). |
IBM z/OS V1R1.0-V1R12.0 DCE Application Development Reference: dce—ace—is—cient—authorized API call: URL: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/topic/com.ibm.zos.r12.euvmd00/euva6a00646.htm, Copyright IBM Corporation 1990,2010, (2 pages). |
O'Reily publications “Unix & Internet Security”, Apr. 1996. (3 pages). |
Schroeder, SDSC's Installation and Development of Kerberos, San Diego Supercomputer Center, San Diego, CA, Sep. 20, 1995, p. 1-11. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/424,874 mailed Oct. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887 Decision Denying Petition re Request for Inter Partes Reexamination mailed May 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887 Order Denying Request for Inter Partes Reexamiation mailed May 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887, Amendment and Response to Office Action mailed on Nov. 27, 2009, Response dated Mar. 1, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887, Inter Partes Reexamination Request dated Apr. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887, Inter Partes Reexamination Request dated Jul. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination/Denied, dated Sep. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/928,887, Response to May 25, 2010 Final Office Action, Response dated Aug. 13, 2010 . |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/612,569, Amendment and Response to Office Action Filed Jun. 14, 2012, (Exh. J to Inter Partes). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/612,569, Inter Partes Reexamination Request dated Aug. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/612,569, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 9, 2012.,(Exh. K to Inter Partes). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/612,569, Request for Inter Partes Reexamination/Granded, dated Oct. 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/324,874, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Action Closing Prosecution dated Oct. 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Reexamination Appellant's Brief filed Mar. 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Examiner's Answer mailed Sep. 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Noticeof Appeal filed Jan. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Notice of Defective Paper in Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Jul. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Notice of Hearing mailed May 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Order dated Nov. 24, 2010 Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Patent Owner Comments filed Nov. 18, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Rebuttal Brief filed Oct. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Respondent's Brief filed Apr. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Response to Office Action filed Mar. 21, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Right of Appeal Notice mailed Dec. 16, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Shortened Response to Office Action filed Aug. 4, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Third Party Requester Comments filed Apr. 15, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Third Party Requester Comments filed Aug. 22, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458 Reexamination Third Party Requester Comments filed Nov. 29, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,458, Inter Partes Reexamination, Request for Oral Hearing, dated Nov. 21, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Action Closing Prosecution mailed Jan. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Office Action mailed Aug. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Office Action mailed Mar. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Office Action Response filed Apr. 30, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Order Granting Inter Partes Reexamination mailed Mar. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Petition Decision mailed Jul. 18, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Request for Inter Partes Reexamination filed Jan. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Response to Office Action filed Oct. 5, 2012, including Exhibits K, L, L-1, L-2, L-3, and L-4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872 Reexamination Right of Appeal Notice mailed Apr. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination , Third Party Requester's Comments on the Patent Owner Response to Aug. 6, 2012 Office Action, dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination Renewed Petition (Third Party Requester to Response to Mar. 1, 2012 Office Action), dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination, Decision Denying Petition (Third Party's Petition filed Aug. 9, 2012), dated Nov. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Decision dated Oct. 11, 2012 Granting Request for Inter Partes Reexamination. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Exhibit T submitted Dec. 10, 2012 with Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Exhibits A-K to Request for Inter Partes Reexamination filed Aug. 31, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Patent Owner's Statement in Inter Partes Reexamination, filed Dec. 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Action Closing Prosecution dated Feb. 5, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Exhibits L-S submitted Dec. 10, 2012 with both Patent Owner's Statement and Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Reexamination Notice of Appeal of Patent Owner, filed May 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115 Reexamination Right of Appeal Notice dated Apr. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 95/002,115, Respose to Office Action in Inter Partes Reexamination, filed Dec. 10, 2012. |
USPTO Patent Full-Text and Image Database, Search for “ISD/Aug. 22, 1978-> Dec. 19, 2005 and ‘biometric authentication’”, (Exhibit III to U.S. Appl. No. 95/001,872, Inter Partes Reexamination Renewed Petition (Third Party Requester to Response to Mar. 1, 2012 Office Action), dated Aug. 9, 2012. |
Ventuneac et al., A policy-based security framework for Web-enabled applications, Proceeding ISICT '03, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies, pp. 487-492. |
Jun. 18, 2013 Listing of Related Applications. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120192256 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11352693 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 13333650 | US |