1. Field of the Invention
This application relates to a shielding tape. More particularly, this application relates to a shielding tape for LAN (Local Area Network) cables.
2. Description of the Related Art
LAN or network type communication cables are typically constructed of a plurality of twisted pairs (two twisted conductors), enclosed within a jacket. A typical construction is to have four twisted pairs inside of a jacket, but many other larger pair count cables are available.
Care is taken to construct these cables in a manner to prevent cross talk with adjacent cables. For example, in a typical installation, many LAN cables may be arranged next to one another, and signals in the pairs from a first cable may cause interference or crosstalk with another pair in an adjacent LAN cable. In order to prevent this, the lay length or twist rate of the pairs in a cable are varied differently from one another. Additionally, when pairs in adjacent cables are running parallel to one another the cross talk can be increased so the pairs within a cable are twisted around one another (helically or SZ stranding) to further decrease interference. Spacing elements can also be used so that the jacket is spaced apart from the pairs so that pairs in adjacent cables are as far away as possible.
Nevertheless, despite all of these features, in some cases, the requirements for increased bandwidth may necessitate additional protection from crosstalk. One such common type of protection is shielding. LAN cable shielding is usually in the form of a foil that is wrapped around the pairs inside the cable, under the jacket. This metal foil is usually wrapped around the assembled core of twisted pairs prior to jacketing and is constructed of suitable metals, for example aluminum.
Although the shield is effective for preventing alien crosstalk and other external signal interferences, the shield must be grounded to the connector in order to meet safety regulations. This is a time consuming step that increases the cost to install the shielded cable. One typical example requires a drain wire to be helically coiled around the shield which also increases the overall cable cost.
In the prior art, there have been proposals to mitigate the above effect by providing a discontinuous shielding tape having periodic breaks in the shield. This design makes sure that any signals that collect in the shield do not extend continuously from end to end of the cable and this obviates the need for grounding the shield. However, in doing so, this design has generated yet another drawback, particularly with respect to the signal quality within the pairs of the cable, owing to interference caused by signals generated by the discontinuous shield elements.
For example, with discontinuous shields, the signals traveling in the pairs can cause induced signals in discontinuous foil elements with the breaks in the shielding giving rise to reflected waves which can create issues with return loss. The patches can collectively interact with the transmitting electrical signals in a cumulative or resonant manner to produce a spike in return loss at a particular frequency of the transmitting signals.
In one example, where the foil size and shape is rectangular with each foil element of the same size and at regular spacing from one another, the generated reflected waves are such that they may occur at one specific frequency, and at a significant amplitude.
Other prior art arrangements of discontinuous shields have attempted to minimize the reflected wave that can be created by discontinuous shielding elements of equal length and spacing by varying the length of the shielding elements relative to the length of the foil segments, finding that the frequency/location of the spike may depend upon the sizes of the foil sections and the gap therebetween.
Other prior art discontinuous shielding tapes try to minimize the amplitude of the reflected wave by having foil pieces (and breaks) that are not perpendicular to the long edge of the substrate running in the direction of the pairs (ie parallelograms).
Although these various arrangements may have some mitigating effect to reduce the amplitude of the reflected waves by increasing the range of frequencies that these reflections occur at, they are still not an optimum solution.
The present arrangement overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art by providing a discontinuous shielding tape, where the conductive shielding elements, disposed on the tape substrate do not form a complete electrical connection from one end of the cable to the other. Moreover, the metal shielding elements on the tape substrate are shaped and dimensioned in a manner that is easy to construct, but also minimizes other signal/interference problems that may be caused by such discontinuous shielding elements, reducing the amplitude of the reflected waves by further increasing the range of frequencies that these reflections occur at and reducing the amplitude of such interference signals.
To this end, the present arrangement provides a communication cable having a plurality of twisted pair communication elements, a jacket surrounding the twisted pairs and a shield element disposed between the pairs and the jacket.
The shield element is constructed as a tape substrate with a plurality of foil shielding elements disposed thereon, the foil shielding elements being formed in the shape of triangles and arranged on the substrate with at least a first foil shield element having a base of its triangle shape disposed substantially parallel to a longitudinal edge of the tape substrate. Each subsequent triangle is disposed on the tape substrate at a distance apart from the first triangle foil shielding element with a base of its triangle shape disposed substantially parallel to an opposite longitudinal edge of the tape substrate.
The present invention can be best understood through the following description and accompanying drawings, wherein:
In one embodiment,
Turning to the discontinuous shielding tape 20,
In a preferred embodiment substrate 22 is typically a thin plastic film composed of any one of polyethylene terephthalate (Mylar™), polypropylene, cellulose acetate butyrate, or other film with sufficient physical properties to survive typical cabling processes. These tapes typically range from 0.001″ to 0.005″ in thickness and are sometimes flame retarded to improve cable fire test performance. The width of substrate 22 can vary depending on the size of the cable construction being shielded and the method of shield application. Exemplary widths for substrate 22 can range from 0.250″ to 3.000″.
Regarding the composition of the triangular shaped foil elements 24, such elements can have a wide variety of dimensions depending on the width of substrate 22 and the angles used to form the triangles. Typically the thickness of foil 24 can range anywhere from 0.0005″ to 0.0050″ depending on the type of external shielding effectiveness required. For the arrangement with foil 24 on only one side of substrate 22, foil 24 typically faces away from pairs 14 with the non-conductive substrate 22 being in contact with pairs 14. Alternatively, there may be some situations where foil elements 24 on substrate 22 are applied to face towards twisted pairs 14 with foil 24 either being in direct contact with pairs 14 or separated from the pairs 14 by another layer, such as a second layer of non-conductive substrate.
In one exemplary arrangement, substrate 22 is substantially 1″ wide with a thickness of about 0.0015″ and constructed of polyethylene terephthalate. The preferred triangular metal foil elements 24 in this configuration have a base of substantially 2″, a height of 1″, 45 degree angles at the base and a 90 degree angle at the vertex. The bases of triangular foil elements 24 are located along the opposite sides of substrate 22 in such a manner where the base of each successive foil triangle element 24 is located on the opposite side of substrate 22 as shown for example in
Unlike the prior art discussed above, the present arrangement, using triangular foil elements 24, applied in alternating fashion, creates reflected waves throughout the entire frequency spectrum instead at just isolated frequencies. By doing this, the amplitude of the reflected waves are greatly reduced along the length of cable 10, thus improving the overall performance of the discontinuously shielded cable.
Regarding the version of tape 20 shown in
In another arrangement, as shown in
Circular shaped and irregularly shaped foil elements 24, as with triangles, also mitigate the standing wave issue. In one example, circles 24 have a diameter of about substantially 1/10th the width of substrate 22 and placed in succession across the width of substrate 22 with a thickness ranging from about 0.0005″ to 0.0050″, although the invention is not limited in this respect. In one arrangement, shielding effectiveness is improved by placing smaller shielding circles or other shielding foil shapes in the small interstices between the circular shielding elements 24.
In yet another arrangement, as shown in
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6207266 | Kanbara et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
RE42266 | Sparrowhawk | Apr 2011 | E |
7923641 | Smith et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8119906 | Smith et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8119907 | McNutt | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8183462 | Nordin et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8217267 | Nordin et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20060048961 | Pfeiler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20090020712 | Matsumoto | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090223694 | Nordin et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100224389 | Jenner et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2432963 | Jun 2007 | GB |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140238720 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |