The buying and selling of goods and services (collectively referred to as “products”) has resulted in a vast array of costing schemes, which are used to select the price at which such products are sold. One of the most common costing schemes which consumers encounter everyday is known as fixed pricing. According to this costing scheme, sellers set a fixed price for their products based on a past demand for the product and/or anticipated future demand. Buyers desiring to purchase products from the seller are each required to pay the same fixed price regardless of the number of products purchased. If a seller finds that the demand for a given product is greater or less than expected, the seller may later adjust the fixed price of the product to account for such findings. Although the fixed pricing provides a simple way for a seller to conduct business with multiple buyers, one drawback of this costing scheme is that it fails to reward buyers willing to purchase greater quantities of products. Accordingly, the discount quantity pricing scheme evolved.
The discount quantity pricing approach to costing involves pricing a product at different levels depending on the quantity of products a customer is willing to purchase. The more products a customer is willing to purchase, the lower the price. Sellers have incentive to lower price for large quantity buyers since the fixed costs associated with producing the product is spread over more items. Thus, sellers are able to make equal or greater profits despite the lowered price of the product. While volume pricing offers a benefit to larger buyers who are able to purchase large quantities of goods at one time, smaller buyers are often unable to obtain the lowered prices and therefore are more likely to “shop around” for the best available deal. This, in turn, hurts both the buyer and seller. For instance, the smaller buyer is burdened with needing to search for alternative deals and still often ends up paying a higher price than larger buyers. The sellers, on the other hand, are faced with lost business since they are unable to reduce their price for the smaller buyers and still make sufficient profit.
Another common costing scheme for pricing a product is an auction. In an auction, a seller sets an initial price for an item and then multiple buyers are given an opportunity to bid against each other for the product. The buyer having placed the highest bid for the product at the end of the auction purchases the product at the final price bid. In order to provide a larger forum for buyers and sellers, a recent trend has been to auction goods electronically over the Internet. For example, one company known to operate an auction site over the Internet is eBay, Inc. Although auctions provide advantages when selling unique products for which customers are willing to competitively bid, the auction forum is not well suited for sellers desiring to sell large quantities of goods to multiple buyers given the inherent inefficiencies involved with selling one product at a time in a bidding environment.
Yet another costing scheme, which has been advanced in recent years, is buyer-driven bidding. According to this costing scheme, a single buyer desiring to obtain a product communicates a price at which the buyer is willing to purchase the product to multiple sellers. Each of the sellers is provided an opportunity to review the buyer's price. A sale is complete when one of the sellers agrees to sell the product to the buyer at the price suggested by the buyer. A buyer-driven bidding scheme is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,794,207 assigned to Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership of Stamford, Conn. While the buyer-driven bidding scheme provides advantages for certain types of transactions when, for example, sellers may be willing to sell products at lower than normal prices, the uncertainties involved with whether a buyer's offer will be accepted is often problematic for high volume commercial transactions in which the reliability that a transaction will be complete is of paramount importance.
While the costing schemes described above have various advantages and disadvantages in different situations, a commonality among all of the costing schemes is that each buyer operates independently with one or more sellers to set a purchase price of a product. For example, in the fixed pricing scheme and discount quantity purchasing scheme, buyers individually determine whether the sellers preset price schedule is acceptable regardless of whether other buyers have decided to purchase the product or not. In an auction, not only do buyers operate independent of other buyers but, in fact, each buyer's decision to place a bid has a negative effect on all other buyers desiring to purchase the same good since the price of the good increases. Similarly, in a buyer-driven bidding scheme, each buyer is completely unaware of the amount other buyers are bidding for a given product.
The independent operations of the buyers stems from a combination of the fact that: 1) the costing schemes discussed above provide little incentive for buyers to work together and 2) there are large inconveniences for buyers to facilitate communication about their buying activities to other buyers. Unfortunately, such independent operation by buyers can result in missed opportunities for both the buyer and seller. For example, in instances where two independent buyers are unable to afford a product, neither buyer informs the seller of their respective desire to purchase the product. Accordingly, sales of the product to these buyers do not take place. Due to the independent operations by each of the buyers, such information is never communicated thereby resulting in missed opportunities for both the buyers and seller alike.
The following presents a simplified summary in order to provide a basic understanding of some aspects of the claimed subject matter. This summary is not an extensive overview. It is not intended to identify key/critical elements or to delineate the scope of the subject invention. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
Briefly described, the subject disclosure pertains to systems and methods directed toward universal discount and demand aggregation. More particularly, mechanisms are provided to assist consumers in participating in group buying by transparently recording and aggregating purchases of a single consumer with the transactions of an entire group of consumers. Participation in group buying is reciprocated with rewards, discounts, special deals and the like from sellers accepting group buys. For some sellers, it is difficult to generate new business opportunities and to create customer loyalty. For example, advertising in periodicals or on television and/or radio are broad, undirected means of advertising. Consumers captured by such methods may only be seeking a short term deal and follow the lowest price. By grouping consumers and aggregating the grouping's purchases, sellers may interact with the grouping as if it were a single large volume purchasing entity. Accordingly, sellers are in a better position to offer rebates, rewards, discounts and the like to the grouped consumers, thus generating new business and cultivating loyalty. Consumers likewise benefit by receiving rewards for their participation.
According to aspect of this disclosure, a purchase data server is provided that includes an aggregation component and a discounting component. The aggregation component records transactions of consumers in a buying group and aggregates the recorded transactions with those of the entire group. The discounting component retains reward policies established by a plurality of sellers. The discounting component releases a reward to universal discount cards associated with members of the buying group whenever the aggregated purchases from a particular seller satisfies the terms and conditions of that seller's reward policy.
In accordance with another aspect of the claimed subject matter, a mechanism is provided to position, globally or geographically, a consumer and/or a universal discount card. Sellers may utilize the position to target specific consumers nearby with special advertisements and/or deals. Consumers may receive these special offers via the universal discount cards or a mobile device such as a cell phone, PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) or the like.
According to yet another aspect of the disclosure, mechanisms are provided to data mine recorded consumer purchasing history data. Consumer purchasing habits can be analyzed to determine patterns useful in providing more relevant advertisements, deals, and/or rewards. Thus, sellers receive relevant consumer purchasing data in exchange for participating in group buying and distributing rewards.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, the invention then, comprises the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims. The following description and the annexed drawings set forth in detail certain illustrative aspects of the invention. These aspects are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the invention may be employed and the subject invention is intended to include all such aspects and their equivalents. Other objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
The subject disclosure pertains to participating in demand aggregation in exchange for special rewards. More specifically, the disclosure is related to mechanisms that facilitate recording and aggregating of purchases transacted between buyers in a buying group and sellers participating with the buying group. In accordance with one embodiment, a purchase data server is provided. The search engine includes mechanisms to record purchase transactions between buyers and sellers for the purposes of aggregation. The aggregated purchases are tracked relative to reward policies established by the sellers participating with the buying group. When the terms and conditions of a reward policy are satisfied, a reward is released and distributed to universal discount cards associated with the buyers in the buying group. Various systems and methods are described hereinafter with respect to universal discounts and demand aggregation as well as relevant tools to aid such functionality.
Various aspects of the subject disclosure are now described with reference to the annexed drawings, wherein like numerals refer to like or corresponding elements throughout. It should be understood, however, that the drawings and detailed description relating thereto are not intended to limit the claimed subject matter to the particular form disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed subject matter.
Initially, what follows is an exemplary implementation of a demand aggregation system as well as a dynamic discount card system. It is to be appreciated that this is but one manner in which aspects of the disclosure can be employed. Others are possible and are to be deemed within the scope of the claimed subject matter. Further yet, additional details regarding the below described mechanisms and interactions can be found in the aforementioned patent application entitled DYNAMIC DISCOUNT CARD TIED TO PRICE CURVES AND GROUP DISCOUNTS, incorporated herein by reference.
Referring initially to
The information access component 110 communicates with a network and/or a bus and receives information related to price curves, quantities, etc. established by a wide variety of users (e.g., sellers). Thus, the information access component 110 can comprise a transmitter, receiver or both. For instance, the information access component 110 can be a receiver that obtains information wirelessly from a tower or a satellite.
Additionally, the information accessed via the information access component 110 is further provided to the presentation component 120. The presentation component 120 can comprise a display (not shown) to present information to a user and/or software to render the information into a displayable format. The display can provide audio information, visual information, touch, etc. to the user. Thus, information can be displayed to a user via the dynamic discount system 100. For example, the information access component 110 can receive updated price curves from a network, which can be provided to the presentation component 120. Furthermore, the presentation component 120 can display the updated price curves to the user.
By way of example, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems and a multitude of software vendors have attempted to bring into balance manufacturing supply with demand over time. Products, along with quantities ordered over time and order frequency, are tracked and evaluated. These programs can include scheduling software, ERP systems, forecasting methods, and, most recently, predictive analysis and demand algorithms, which help predict and manage estimated production. In many instances, these solutions have sought to estimate and respond to various demand scenarios and optimize return on assets or utilization rates while meeting customer demand regarding item, options and delivery schedules. In many instances, the production schedule can be managed to meet predicted or real demand. As a result, resources can then be effectively planned and managed.
Pricing software can be employed to optimize profit by understanding individual demand and costs to service a customer. A price is determined based on such characteristics. Pricing software can manage prices relative to individual customers. Price sensitivity tools, in addition to other metrics, can be provided to determine optimal price strategies and trade-offs.
The Internet has been a delivery tool to provide these solutions. New technologies such as wi-fi and PDA's (personal digital assistants) can further extend the solutions throughout ever-larger geographic areas for this updated information on demand.
Demand aggregation, as described infra, has established a fundamental, yet revolutionary, difference in existing ERP and pricing software thinking. Demand aggregation effectively enables a seller to offer products, volumes, options, ship dates and price curves tied to the volume ordered by an entire group of unrelated buyers in pre-production or simply before the item has ever been produced. The exact number of items to be produced, the types and final price depend upon the quantity ordered. Furthermore, the seller can provide multiple price curves and multiple ship dates at different thresholds for the same item to different buyers, essentially grouping buyers individually or in strategic sub-sets with a different set of products, options, and prices. Yet, inherent within the model set forth herein, every user (e.g., buyer) selecting the same ship date is helping other users (e.g., buyers and seller) reduce cost to produce items in question. Demand is grouped among unrelated buyers across states, countries and continents to lower prices. Mass customization occurs while the Internet is utilized to group users in optimal economic ordering quantities.
Numerous options and features can be utilized upon this software platform including smart pricing modules, segmenting individuals into different groups based on their ordering history, smart shopping bots for buyers, etc.
Translation software is available to take existing product catalogs and other pertinent information and translate that into group dynamic price curves. This translation software is also available as an XML-based or other data exchange format that could allow the demand aggregation offer to be created by a series of queries (e.g., a series of “What if” questions that determine changes in volumes, products, options, price-curves, ship dates, . . . ) that could be used to automatically populate an offer form and be made available to potential and existing users with some screening filters offered to the seller (e.g., D&B credit run on buyer first).
For instance, a company using any variety of pricing, ERP, catalog, etc. software can list 5,000 widgets for delivery in 5 days with a price per unit of $1.00. The demand aggregation translation software can translate the existing “what if 10,000 are ordered, what if 20,000 are ordered, what if 40,000 are ordered, etc.” to create in real-time a price-discount curve tied to volume that can immediately be displayed for the buyers and compared to other available options.
The dynamic discount system 100 is an add-on feature that can be employed by a buyer to connect to offers presented by seller(s) in real-time and other “spot” offerings derived from shopping bots, catalogs, etc.
Turning to
The configuration component 220 facilitates configuration of the dynamic discount card 210. For example, the configuration component 220 can initialize the information access component 110 such that the information received by the information access component 110 corresponds to a user's profile; therefore, the user can receive information associated with a group of goods and/or services offered by a seller(s). Additionally and/or alternatively, the configuration component 220 can be employed to preset a discount amount for a particular dynamic discount card 210. The configuration component 220 can configure the dynamic discount card 210 locally and/or remotely.
For purposes of understanding and not limitation, the following exemplary scenario is provided. The dynamic discount card 210 is mailed to a prospective buyer by a seller, media outlet, etc. Selected sellers send out electronic messages to the dynamic discount card 210 via the configuration component 220 (e.g., utilizing electronic, wi-fi, and other available methods) to provide updated product and price discount offers tied to volumes and ship dates/delivery dates that are stored on the card. Alternatively, the card 210 can be pre-loaded via a local configuration component 220 with default products and services at discount prices with only a buyer to enter the access code to initiate communication. In any event, the card 210 can show and/or recite the prices with a small voice activated chip (defaults can be set), the availability, and ship dates for the item in question, and other information via the presentation component 120.
Still yet another variation is for the discount card 210 to be loaded via the configuration component 220 with a profile of a cardholder (e.g., demographics, age, income, . . . ) that can interact with cable and other forms of communication (e.g., television). This information can be conveyed to a central database with pre-determined (e.g., based on age and income) protocols that show one or more advertisements to that individual or set of individuals holding respective cards 210. Likewise, specific prices (e.g., time based offer, discount, price curve . . . ) can be served up to the individual or set of individuals via the shared medium.
A targeted message can be cued and sent to the cardholder who is within range of that particular device. The customer, using the card 210, would then be able to respond to the offer as well as view the “localized” price and offer utilizing the presentation component 120. A default payment method can be stored in the card 210 with password protection or unique id coding and/or encryption technologies that enables the holder to execute the order at that time.
Referring next to
Furthermore, a user may interact with discount card 310 utilizing a user input component 320. For instance, the user input component 320 can be buttons on a surface of the card 310 to allow a user to view and manipulate information (thus, the user input component 320 can vary the information displayed via the presentation component 120). Additionally and/or alternatively, the user input component 320 can be a touch screen input and/or contain voice recognition software. Still further yet, the user input component 320 can be a magnetic strip on a surface of the card 310 to allow it to be read or programmed using a scanning device (not shown).
UNC (Uniform Naming Code) codes, or other methods to confirm product specificity, can be used to send/retrieve specific information. Voice recognition, impulse recognition, icons, radio frequency ID, and other messaging devices can be utilized to represent buyers' demand/order intention visibly and to optimize the capacity and time scenario faced by sellers by communicating with offers as well as senders/receivers. The card 310 can interact with an ERP and pricing model software as it translates available inventory and potential inventory for an item with benefits of demand aggregation. The communication can occur between a network of items including but not limited to demand card(s), handheld device(s), product(s), skid(s), container(s), ERP system(s), and vehicle(s). Order volumes can be changed employing the user input component 320 and their impact seen upon the presentation component 120 as well. Supplier and buyer(s) are offered the ability to change their quantities to see how it impacts the system as a whole. A buyer can see the same product represented in four different locations and have a freight estimator included to show total cost. In this scenario, the price of an item can be more expensive in location B, but the proximity of the product in location A may be cause it to be shown first when sorted by price.
Viewing options on the card 310 displayed with the presentation component 120 can include: product code, picture, current price, future price, availability, shipping added and final price, list of sellers, price history, ratings by seller, sorting by various options, filters on certain sellers, etc.
Furthermore, the current price can be shown with immediate delivery or a price curve (or some other graphical representation) shown along with the potential savings and the timeframe required. For example, the probability of the price dropping a certain percentage (e.g., 10%, 20% . . . ) such that the buyer can make an informed choice of either ordering the item for immediate delivery or placing an order and waiting for a discount to occur over time.
Another option can be for the buyer to provide a counteroffer utilizing the user input component 320, for instance, stating he will pay a 15% premium and/or a set price if the availability is within a specified period or even immediately available. The sellers of bots and price curves will have the ability to respond accordingly; however, the strength of the service is aggregating demand and the more time given the more advantage it is to not only the seller but to the buyers as a group.
The user can control the information and/or format of the information presented by the presentation component 120 by utilizing the user input component 320. The user input component 320 enables the dynamic discount card 310 to filter, sort, track, and retrieve offers. Additionally, the card 310 can be updated utilizing the latest bots and new price curves submitted. The total demand data is also available to sellers and buyers to review and see historical information and trends over time. A buyer can then order directly from the card utilizing the user input component 320 (e.g., by pressing order and confirm buttons, voice recognition . . . ). Additionally, the card 310 can provide a buyer more specific information regarding payment, delivery date, and whether to send elsewhere as an FYI. The card 310 can also be integrated with a variety of items including but not limited to laptops, personal digital assistants, cell phones, car panels, transporters, televisions, billboards with the code specified, id numbers, scanners, or wherever a receiving chip can receive updated signals from sellers.
According to another example, a seller can send out directed mail pieces with unique discount codes printed on the dynamic discount card 310 for a new buyer to try a particular product or service. In such a case, the card 310 can be activated only for a short-period but reflect changing discounts that are updated to the card 310 as an enticement to order from this seller. In addition, messages can be sent to the dynamic discount card 310 from the network when product availability changes and prices need to be adjusted in real-time (e.g., available quantity is sold out, next price shown). Moreover, the card 310 could be programmed to reflect these changes as they are made by the seller's selling software (dynamic discounts).
At the conclusion of the period, one type of card 310 can be simply discarded. Other cards 310 can be set-up to receive offers from new sellers and their products and services via the network/bus. Still other cards 310 can interact with one another, providing comparative pricing information that can then be used and stored by the other person.
When a buyer orders, the price discount shown on the display (e.g., presentation component 120) can be confirmed and sent to the seller. For example, the information access component 110 can send the order to the seller via the network/bus. All order information can be sent as well within the same digital transfer although this is not necessary. Shipping options/preferences as well can be programmed or a default provided. If the price is aggregated with others during a set period of time, the final price can be determined by the total volume ordered and shown to the buyer at that time. All products, prices, volumes, sellers, etc. can then be saved to the card 310 and/or sent to the user's home account on the Internet for future access, ported, etc.
An individual carrying a dynamic discount card 310 equipped with intelligence can be alerted to new price discounts and buying opportunities for select items that have been tagged by the user. Likewise, the same cards 310 can interface with one another, allowing a card to synch with another card. In such a case, a buying group (e.g., a purchasing co-op) could issue cards that carry their own dynamic discount cards 310 with select sellers. The cards 310 thus can create a network of buyers with access to current and future prices. The buyers' cards 310 can automatically synchronize demand among members for these items and track the numbers of the group as a whole. A buyer could opt to accept this price or alternatively accept a different one shown by the presentation component 120.
In some cases as a variation, sellers can choose to bid on the volume in real-time in which case a central buyer may be given authority to place the order on behalf of the group (with certain restrictions noted). In other cases, the issuing party is a publisher seeking to create value for readers while selling adjoining advertising space and seller fees for posting offers by product search code.
The code can be identified per individual user and can track the origination of the program by each message sent by the seller or originating source. For instance, one interpretation of the code 03380907 could as follows: 03 corresponds to a seller (e.g., Acme Inc.), 3 is a type of message (e.g., an electronic message), 8 is an address code with city and state, 0 is a type of customer (e.g., a direct user), 9 could correlate to a time sent and discount period open (e.g., two weeks), and 0 could be an actual discount (e.g., 10%) and 7 can be a unique code assigned to a product. Additionally it should be noted that a picture of the item as well as technical data could be sent along with the closest location.
The entire code number could be entered by the prospect with a press of the button upon the user input component 320 to see the entire price curve, future discounts, and a variety of other items currently available with the demand aggregation. An accept offer icon can be available such that a customer can submit acceptance by pressing a button or confirming via voice activation number sent. Other available options include but are not limited to various alerts timed to price and time period elapsed.
The code can be entered verbally, scanned, called in, etc., but the translator is able to take the unique pulse or id number once used and collate all orders as they arrive. A tracking system can facilitate determining a current volume of items ordered as well as available quantity left. The seller then has the ability to target different programs online or via voice activation by simply entering the corresponding code and making the change (e.g., all distributors receive an additional 5% off if the order is received within the next 24 hours).
Segments of DDC cardholders can be targeted as well based on a variety of preferences. For example, if a national equipment rental company has only a 35% rental rate in the Dallas market, an offer can be presented to the 1,000 cardholders within a 50 mile radius of the zip code indicating a new price curve or discount based on renting equipment from that location within the next 48 hours. A discount curve can be shown along with the final price that is calculated even after the product has been rented. In this case, a discount can be offered.
Management software enables the seller to post offers to different DDC members segmented by any number of criteria including but not limited to geography in real-time, personal profile, the volume ordered previously, and product bundling (e.g., if item X is ordered, Y is now 10% off).
The card 310 can be scanned as well through a variety of swipes that can make the “purchase” along with proper payment and debit/credit information. A “final” price can be determined by expiration of a period as well as a final volume ordered by the group along with discounts given along the way. Any limitations can be recorded in the unique number including payment terms, available credit, etc.
The card 310 can be updated automatically as well for the customer and those customers who have not yet ordered but have indicated they want to be updated on the progress of an offer. Furthermore, an alert can be sent when there is price movement down (certain signal) or up (different signal). The available quantity can also be shown in real-time along with a purchase when volume reaches X or price equals Z. An auto-order can be placed or the user can select an “alert me before placing order” that responds in kind.
Multiple products and offers can be received, stored and retrieved as required. A screening filter is also available (e.g., mycard) utilizing the user input component 320 to select those product/service categories most interested by the cardholder. The cardholder has the ability to turn off the offers as well based on any number of criteria. The card 310 then saves these requests and does not translate their respective transmissions, but instead filters them out accordingly (sellers can access this information). Filters can be engaged temporarily or longer. The card can be set-up by a myriad of ways that can be controlled by the provider of the card (e.g., no filters on select sellers) or filtered by the buyer (purchasing co-op defaulting to certain sellers over others). Furthermore, the cards 310 can interact with a central database of offers submitted by the seller and organized by an indexed system that can be searched.
A seller who issues a card 310 can be required to maintain a private password, code, etc. to access the card. While the discount cards 310 will interface with one another via various devices to update the latest prices and access codes, a provider of the card 310 can have a registration page and process that requires payment by the seller to show the prices in real-time to the group of buyers. If a seller purchases a product ID code to advertise, this can be seen on the display screen as well while the prices are being presented.
In addition, GPS can be utilized to interface with the cards 310 and show a graphical representation of everyone across the globe, their location, etc. A seller may request and pay to send a message to a group of select customers within a geographical area at a certain time. Likewise, they may pay to see what buyers have ordered a certain UNC item over the past two months and resend a new special that will be positioned first when these individuals select to search the item next. Again, placement and positions can be sold by the UNC number, location, and many other criteria or filtered out.
For example, a buyer could pull out the card 310, enter a hotel location and specify the number of nights utilizing the user input component 320 and see via the presentation component 120 the list of available hotels along with those with price curves (current and future prices), the shopping bots (current price), other opportunities (co-op price), or last minute opportunities provided by other sources. The card 310 would enable the buyer to see a comparison of the modules and place an order with one of his/her choice.
Dynamic discount cards 310 can also interface with the equipment and/or product themselves. In time, chips embedded in the item will respond to either the equipment as it is producing the product in question and/or the product as it is being delivered to inventory. The system can return price and an availability point according to this system as well which may be aggregated or unaggregated. An option can exist to calculate the transportation/freight cost and show the final price and availability to the buyer. The buyer can accept or reject this offer.
Dynamic discount cards 310 can also be sent to select buyers with certain built-in discounts based on company size, negotiated prices already established, etc. but will still integrate with the demand aggregation concept and shopping bots results. For example, a large buyer can have dynamic discount cards 310 with a seller's item showing a price of X. The card 310 receives dynamic pricing data from that seller via the information access component 110 and, in the event the price drops below X, the buyer(s) is alerted to this opportunity. Another example is to have a pre-negotiated “5% below the lowest price made public,” which means the card 310 would register a price that is 5% below the lowest price available from this seller with the DDC 310 for that item. The price for this item(s) is automatically calculated by the card 310 and shown to all buyers with the presentation component 120. Yet another example is the card 310 that has a priority over other buyers by seeing the offer in advance. An offer would be sent via a signal from the network/bus to the DDC that denotes it as a “special” offer with limited review time.
A cardholder has the ability to search by product category, product item, seller by name, and a variety of other options. The search can be initiated by the user via the user input component 320.
In yet another example, a publisher, portal, search engine, etc. providing the dynamic discount cards 310 can have the activities of every member tracked accordingly. For instance, if two million dynamic discount cards 310 are issued and their activities are stored, that publisher has the ability to track in real-time the demand and purchasing activity online. This information can be bundled and sold to sellers, advertisers and other interested parties. The recipients of the DDC's 310 are notified of the terms and conditions surrounding this particular card and should accept or reject these conditions. Thus, how this information will be used is important for buyer as well as sellers involved. The buyer activity may be tracked in a wide range of segments including but not limited to:
Another variation is for the card 310 to simply assign a number to a particular discount % once confirmed. For instance, if a buyer selects an item from the DDC 310 and a price is shown along with a discount, a quick code can be generated. That code can then be saved and used by the buyer when he/she places the order (can be at a later time, attached to a purchase order, referenced at time of ordering, etc.). This code can be good for a certain time period (e.g., 24 hours) as specified by the seller. Again, different variations exist to allow for multiple codes to be issued to different buyers. If the code is not used within the specified time, the offer can lapse accordingly. The DDC 310 records and saves pertinent information on the buyer as well as the central database of all DDC 310 holders.
Yet another example, a seller can see the buyer has responded to 5 offers but has not placed a single order. The seller can seek to have this buyer blocked from the offer or otherwise restrict the buyer from placing an order.
Turning to
The artificial intelligence component 420 can make inferences regarding information to display upon the card 410 utilizing the presentation component 120. Additionally and/or alternatively, the artificial intelligence component 420 can infer a user's intended input via the user input component 320. Therefore, the artificial intelligence component 420 can effectuate altering the displayed information upon the presentation component 120 in accordance with the performed inference. Alternatively, the artificial intelligence component 420 can accept an offer from a seller based upon the inference. The artificial intelligence component 420 can employ techniques such as, for example, Bayesian networks, support vector machines, etc. to perform such inferences. However, the present invention is not limited to these techniques to perform such inferences.
Turning now to
The dynamic discount card 510 also can receive and transmit information. For example, the dynamic discount card 510 can receive/transmit information wirelessly utilizing a tower 540 and/or a satellite 550.
In view of the exemplary systems described supra, a methodology that may be implemented in accordance with the present invention will be better appreciated with reference to the flow chart of
Turning to
What follows now are systems and methods for universal discount cards. Mechanisms are described wherein consumer purchases are aggregated and aggregation results matching certain criteria trigger the distribution of rewards to consumers. Consumers may purchase goods and/or services, for example, in the aforementioned manner. However, it should be appreciated that consumers are not limited to that method alone.
Turning initially to
In addition to purchasing component 740 associated with buyers 720, a universal discount card 710 is linked to each member of the buying group. According to one aspect, the universal discount card 710 may be a special card (e.g. a gift card, smart card . . . ) issued to buyers 720 upon joining a buying group or a personal card (e.g., credit card, debit card . . . ) linked to the system. It is to be appreciated that the universal discount card 710 need not be a physical card. For example, the universal discount card 710 may be linked to a buying group account or an online identity of a buyer. Accordingly, a username, an account number, or other such identifying marker may be used in place of a physical card. Further, a buyer may utilize a mobile device (e.g. a cellular phone, PDA . . . ) to implement the universal discount card 710. Still further yet, the universal discount card 710 can be embodied as a dynamic discount card 210, as previously described (or vice versa).
The universal discount card 710 enables, among other things, sellers 730 to reward buyers 720 for purchasing goods and/or services. As discussed supra, purchases of buyers 720 in a buying group conducted via the purchasing component 740 are aggregated. When aggregated purchase totals reach certain levels or thresholds, sellers 730 may release various rewards or offers to universal discount card 710. Buyers 720 may then collect the rewards or partake in the offers. These rewards or offers may include a gift certificate amount (e.g. a monetary amount employable universally or with a particular seller), a percentage discount on a future purchase, a special reduce price on a good and/or service, a percentage returned on purchases or other forms of reward.
To illustrate further, an exemplary situation is described. A buying group may negotiate with a book store to participate in the universal discount card system. Once seller participation is enlisted, purchases by buyers in the buying group at the book store are tracked and aggregated. The buyers employ purchasing component 740 (e.g., special credit/debit card, personal credit/debit card . . . ) to complete transaction so that the transaction may be recorded for aggregation. The purchasing component 740 may be utilized at physical locations of the book store and/or at an online store and still be aggregated. The book store may unilaterally determine the terms and conditions of its reward policy or the policy may be determined through negotiations between the buying group and the book store. One reward policy may be establishing a threshold purchase total wherein, after the threshold is met, a gift certificate cash amount is released to the buying group via the universal discount card 710. For example, when the buying group purchases $50,000 worth of books from the book store, the book store may release a $20 gift certificate for the book store to the buyers via the universal discount card 710. The universal discount card 710 may be a physical card such as a gift card or a smart card. The card can be presented to the book store during future purchases to be redeemed. Alternatively, universal discount card 710 may be an online account. A bar code representing the $20 gift certificate is deposited in the online account of buyers in the buying group. The bar code may be printed and subsequently presented to the book store. The bar code may also be displayed on the screen of a mobile device and scanned therefrom at the book store.
Referring to
The purchase data server 810 is accessible by both buyers 720 and sellers 730. Buyers 720 may access the purchase data server 810 to discover the activity of the buying group and review the reward policy of one or more sellers. For example, buyers 720 may determine a reward threshold level for a particular seller and the current progress of the buying group in meeting that threshold. Further, as described with reference to
Sellers 730 may also access the purchase data server 810 to determine the purchases of buyer 720 as members of a buying group. Additionally, sellers 730 may also establish the terms and conditions of a reward policy for a buying group via the purchase data server 810. For example, sellers 730 employ the purchase data server 810 to establish a threshold purchase amount for the buying group to meet and an associated gift certificate amount, discount, special offer, and the like to be released once the threshold is satisfied. Further, sellers 730 may employ data mining techniques on the aggregated purchase data to determine buyer habits and the like. Sellers 730 can discover the types of goods and/or services the buying group is purchasing in order to target the buying group with more directed special offers and advertisements.
Turning briefly to
While rewards may be released universally to all members of a buying group, it is to be appreciated that targeted or selective rewards may also be distributed. Targeted or selective rewards may be a function of buying patterns determined from data mining purchase data collected by the purchase data server 810. For example, a particular seller may determine that a subset of buyers in a buying group include high volume purchasers. The seller may release a special reward, discount, offer or the like to the universal discount cards 810 associated with that subset of the buying group as opposed to all members of the group. Thus, purchase data server 810 enables sellers 730 to efficiently advertise and market to buyers in a buying group by analyzing the buying history of the group.
Referring now to
Sellers, via the seller interface component 1010, may access aggregation component 1020 and discounting component 1030. Aggregation component 1020 receives transaction information from the purchasing component 740 described with reference to
Sellers may also retrieve purchase data recorded by the aggregation component 1020. The purchase data can be data mined to determine patterns such as what goods and/or services buyers are purchasing, which buyers are spending the greatest amounts, identifying buying group subsets in accordance with specified criteria and the like. For example, sellers employing data mining techniques on the purchase data may discover a subset of the buying group particularly interested in software development books. Sellers may employ such discoveries to selectively target the subset with special advertisements, offers, rewards, discounts or the like.
The discounting component 1030 is also accessible by the sellers via the seller interface component 1010. Sellers employ the discounting component 1030 to establish a reward policy for a buying group. A reward policy may have a plurality of parameters such as purchase total thresholds, aggregation time periods (e.g. the amount of time aggregation advances the buying group's progress in meeting the threshold), rewards for meeting a threshold level and the like. The discounting component 1030 releases and distributes the rewards to the universal discount card 710 when the buying group meets one or more thresholds specified in the reward policy. The aggregation component 1020 populates a price or discount curve and this purchase aggregation triggers the discount component 1030 to determine if the terms and conditions of the reward policy are satisfied before releasing rewards to the universal discount card 710. For example, the aggregation component 1020 can record transaction between a buying group and an electronics retailer. The electronics retailer establishes a reward policy by employing the discounting component 1030 via the seller interface component 1010. The reward policy might be a $30 gift certificate for every $50,000 worth of electronics purchased by the buying group. Whenever the purchase total of transactions between the buying group and the retailer recorded and aggregated by the aggregation component 1020 reaches a multiple of $50,000, the discounting component 1030 is triggered to distribute a $30 gift certificate to the universal discount cards 710 associated with members of the buying group. Further, the electronic retailer can data mine the purchase data recorded by the aggregation component 1020 and determine, among other things, the top buyers by purchase volume in the buying group. The electronic retailer may decide to rewards the top buyers with additional rewards, discounts, special offers or the like. The electronics retailer employs the discounting component 1020 to create and distribute the additional rewards to the universal discount cards 710 associated with the top buyers.
Buyers may also employ the aggregation component 1020 and the discounting component 1030 via the buyer interface component 1040. A buyer, utilizing the aggregation component 1020, can review his individual purchases or review the aggregated purchases of the entire buying group. For example, the buyer can determine which seller received the majority of the buyer's purchases or the majority of the buying group's purchases. The buyer, utilizing the discounting component 1030, can review the reward policies established by sellers and track the buying group's progress in achieving rewards from the sellers. Buyers may also employ the discounting component to review a history of past rewards distributed and a listing of currently active rewards on the universal discount card 710. According to one aspect of the subject disclosure, the universal discount card 710 is associated with an online identity or account. The online account may be hosted by the discounting component 1030 but it should be appreciated that the online account can be hosted another system, remote or otherwise, that is communicatively coupled to the purchase data server 810. In accordance with the online account embodiment, buyers may access the online account by utilizing the discounting component 1030. Rewards, discounts, or special offers released by the discounting component 1030 are deposited in the online account to be retrieved by the buyers. The reward may be a bar code presentable to sellers to redeem the value of the reward. Buyers may print the bar code or access the bar code via a mobile device to be scanned off the mobile device display.
Buyers, upon joining the buying group, may determine a level of participation. The level of participation indicates how much transaction information is recorded by the aggregation component 1020 and, accordingly, how much information about a particular buyer sellers may access. For example, at a low level of participation, a buyer's transactions with sellers are recorded and aggregated but sellers do not have access to the buyer's identity via data mining in order to provide targeted advertisements. Conversely, at a high level of participation, sellers have access to complete buying histories of buyers and those buyers are willing to receive special offers and advertisements.
Turning now to
Once a buyer's position is determined by locating the universal discount card 710 or some other GPS enabled device of the buyer's, sellers can provide the buyer with special offers and/or advertisements associated with those sellers nearby the buyer's current location. For example, a buyer can be at a shopping center. The buyer's position is determined by the positioning component 1110 and the buyer's universal discount card 710 may be provided with special offers and/or advertisements from sellers in the shopping center that are participating with the buyer's buying group. According to another aspect of the subject disclosure, the positioning component 1110 may ping the buyer's mobile device (e.g., cell phone, PDA, blackberry . . . ) with the special offers and/or advertisements. The buyer's mobile may receive a message containing a bar code implementing a special offer from a seller in the shopping center. The buyer may redeem the special offer by visiting the seller's location and presenting the bar code for scanning via the mobile device.
It should be appreciated that the universal discount card 710 may also be enabled with radio frequency identification (RFID). Thus, whenever the universal discount card 710 enters within a specified locality of a participating seller, its presence is detected. The seller may provide the detected universal discount card 710 with special offers and/or advertisements. While positioning component 1110 may employ a large area geographical or global location system, it should be appreciated that a smaller scale location system may also be utilized to discover potentially interested buyers.
The aforementioned systems, architectures and the like have been described with respect to interaction between several components. It should be appreciated that such systems and components can include those components or sub-components specified therein, some of the specified components or sub-components, and/or additional components. Sub-components could also be implemented as components communicatively coupled to other components rather than included within parent components. Further yet, one or more components and/or sub-components may be combined into a single component to provide aggregate functionality. Communication between systems, components and/or sub-components can be accomplished in accordance with either a push and/or pull model. The components may also interact with one or more other components not specifically described herein for the sake of brevity, but known by those of skill in the art.
Furthermore, various portions of the disclosed systems and methods may include or consist of artificial intelligence, machine learning, or knowledge or rule based components, sub-components, processes, means, methodologies, or mechanisms (e.g., support vector machines, neural networks, expert systems, Bayesian belief networks, fuzzy logic, data fusion engines, classifiers . . . ). Such components, inter alia, can automate certain mechanisms or processes performed thereby to make portions of the systems and methods more adaptive as well as efficient and intelligent. By way of example and not limitation, the purchase data server 810 can utilize such techniques to facilitate analysis of purchase data of buyers in a buying group. For example, the purchase data server 810 can infer that a buyer may be interested in a particular deal as a function of previous purchases, the time of year, business and/or personal needs, among other things. Furthermore, such deals may be pushed to a user without explicit manual initiation by a seller, for instance as a notification generated as a result of location.
In view of the exemplary systems described supra, methodologies that may be implemented in accordance with the disclosed subject matter will be better appreciated with reference to the flow charts of
Referring now to
At reference numeral 1210, a buyer in a buying group buys goods and/or services from a seller via a purchasing component. The purchasing component can be a special credit card or a debit card issued to the buyer upon joining the buying group. It should be appreciated that the purchasing component can also be a deposit account, a personal credit or debit card, and other payment systems capable of being tracked.
At reference numeral 1220, the purchases of the buyer via the purchasing component are aggregated with the purchases of other buyers in the buying group from the seller. The seller establishes a reward policy including a price or discount curve. Under an exemplary reward policy, the buying group purchases are populated on the price or discount curve. When specified thresholds in the total purchase amount are reached, a reward may be provisioned to the buying group. It should be appreciated that other reward policies to encourage business and reward loyalty can be contemplated.
At numeral 1230, when the terms and conditions of the reward policy are satisfied, rewards, discounts, rebates and the like are distributed to the buying group via a universal discount card. The universal discount card can be a gift card, a smart card or the like. It is also to be appreciated that the universal discount card can be an online account accessible from a personal computer, mobile device (e.g. cell phone, PDA, blackberry . . . ) or other processor based device.
Turning now to
At reference numeral 1320, the buyer establishes a group purchasing component. The purchasing component can be a special credit or debit card issued by the buying group or associated service. Alternatively, the buyer can register a personal credit or debit card as the purchasing component.
At numeral 1330, the buyer establishes the desired level of participation. At a low participation level, the buyer's purchases are aggregated with those of the buying group. However, the seller may not access all the transaction details of the buyer's purchasing history. Further, the buyer's low level of participation indicates the buyer's desire to not receive targeted or selective advertisements and/or offers. Conversely, at a high participation level, the buyer's purchases are still aggregated, but sellers may access complete details of the buyer's purchasing history. The buyer also indicates a desire to receive specially targeted advertisements and/or offers. Further, a high level of participation may also indicate a willingness to be globally or geographically positioned in order to receive special advertisements and deals in a geographical context. Moreover, there can be a number of levels between high and low that include various combinations of services and/or functionality.
At reference numeral 1340, a universal discount card is issued to the buyer. The universal discount card can be a gift card, a smart card or the like. The universal discount card can also be an online account or program accessible via a network (e.g., local area network, wide area network, Internet, wireless, satellite . . . ). It should also be appreciated that the universal discount card can be the same as the special credit card issued at reference numeral 1320. In that respect, the rewards can be a cash-back refund or the like.
Referring now to
As used herein, the terms “component,” “system” and the like are intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software, or software in execution. For example, a component may be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an instance, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a computer and the computer can be a component. One or more components may reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component may be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean serving as an example, instance or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other aspects or designs. Furthermore, examples are provided solely for purposes of clarity and understanding and are not meant to limit the subject innovation or relevant portion thereof in any manner. It is to be appreciated that a myriad of additional or alternate examples could have been presented, but have been omitted for purposes of brevity.
Furthermore, all or portions of the subject innovation may be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware, or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed innovation. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device or media. For example, computer readable media can include but are not limited to magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips . . . ), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD) . . . ), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive . . . ). Additionally it should be appreciated that a carrier wave can be employed to carry computer-readable electronic data such as those used in transmitting and receiving electronic mail or in accessing a network such as the Internet or a local area network (LAN). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications may be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the claimed subject matter.
In order to provide a context for the various aspects of the disclosed subject matter,
With reference to
The system memory 1516 includes volatile and nonvolatile memory. The basic input/output system (BIOS), containing the basic routines to transfer information between elements within the computer 1512, such as during start-up, is stored in nonvolatile memory. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory can include read only memory (ROM). Volatile memory includes random access memory (RAM), which can act as external cache memory to facilitate processing.
Computer 1512 also includes removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer storage media.
The computer 1512 also includes one or more interface components 1526 that are communicatively coupled to the bus 1518 and facilitate interaction with the computer 1512. By way of example, the interface component 1526 can be a port (e.g., serial, parallel, PCMCIA, USB, FireWire . . . ) or an interface card (e.g., sound, video, network . . . ) or the like. The interface component 1526 can receive input and provide output (wired or wirelessly). For instance, input can be received from devices including but not limited to, a pointing device such as a mouse, trackball, stylus, touch pad, keyboard, microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, camera, other computer and the like. Output can also be supplied by the computer 1512 to output device(s) via interface component 1526. Output devices can include displays (e.g., CRT, LCD, plasma . . . ), speakers, printers and other computers, among other things.
The system 1600 includes a communication framework 1650 that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 1610 and the server(s) 1630. Here, the client(s) can correspond to user (e.g. buyers or sellers) computing devices and the server(s) can provide the functionality of the purchase data server, as previously described. The client(s) 1610 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 1660 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 1610. Similarly, the server(s) 1630 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 1640 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 1630. By way of example, a user (e.g., buyer and/or seller) can login to one or more servers 1630 via a client 1610 and provide a profile including information about the user corresponding to the user's identity. The server(s) 1630 can persist this information to data store(s) 1640.
What has been described above includes examples of aspects of the claimed subject matter. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing the claimed subject matter, but one of ordinary skill in the art may recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the disclosed subject matter are possible. Accordingly, the disclosed subject matter is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the terms “includes,” “has” or “having” or variations in form thereof are used in either the detailed description or the claims, such terms are intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/867,625, filed Jun. 15, 2004 and entitled DYNAMIC DISCOUNT CARD TIED TO PRICE CURVES AND GROUP DISCOUNTS, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4887207 | Natarajan | Dec 1989 | A |
4947028 | Gorog | Aug 1990 | A |
4992940 | Dworkin | Feb 1991 | A |
5053956 | Donald et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5053957 | Suzuki | Oct 1991 | A |
5063506 | Brockwell et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5402336 | Spiegelhoff et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414838 | Kolton et al. | May 1995 | A |
5444630 | Dlugos | Aug 1995 | A |
5564115 | Clarkson | Oct 1996 | A |
5592375 | Salmon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5615109 | Eder | Mar 1997 | A |
5623660 | Josephson | Apr 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5710887 | Chelliah et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732400 | Mandler et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734890 | Case et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5794207 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797127 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5822736 | Hartman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5837071 | Andersson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842178 | Giovannoli | Nov 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5855008 | Goldhaber et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870721 | Norris | Feb 1999 | A |
5878400 | Carter, III | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5897620 | Walker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923741 | Wright et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933817 | Hucal | Aug 1999 | A |
5940807 | Purcell | Aug 1999 | A |
5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950172 | Klingman | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966697 | Fergerson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970478 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974396 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974406 | Bisdikian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987434 | Libman | Nov 1999 | A |
5995943 | Bull et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999915 | Nahan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014638 | Burge et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016484 | Williams et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026383 | Ausubel | Feb 2000 | A |
6032136 | Brake et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035289 | Chou et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052670 | Johnson | Apr 2000 | A |
6055519 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055573 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064981 | Barni et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078906 | Huberman | Jun 2000 | A |
6101484 | Halbert et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108632 | Reeder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108639 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112185 | Walker et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112189 | Rickard et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6131087 | Luke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141653 | Conklin et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151588 | Tozzoli et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6167383 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
6195646 | Grosh et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219653 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233566 | Levine et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236972 | Shkedy | May 2001 | B1 |
6236977 | Verba et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236978 | Tuzhilin | May 2001 | B1 |
6249772 | Walker et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260019 | Courts | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260024 | Shkedy | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266651 | Woolston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269343 | Pallakoff | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6289348 | Richard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6323894 | Katz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327574 | Kramer et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332127 | Bandera et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332135 | Conklin et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336105 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338050 | Conklin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360205 | Iyengar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397208 | Lee | May 2002 | B1 |
6415270 | Rackson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418415 | Walker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418441 | Call | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6449601 | Friedland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450407 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456986 | Boardman et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466919 | Walker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496568 | Nelson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507279 | Loof | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6510434 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535856 | Tal | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553346 | Walker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553350 | Carter | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560501 | Walser et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6578014 | Murcko, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584451 | Shoham et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587835 | Treyz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6598026 | Ojha et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601043 | Purcell | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604089 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606603 | Joseph et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606607 | Martin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607136 | Atsmon et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631356 | Van Horn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647257 | Owensby | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647373 | Carlton-Foss | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658093 | Langseth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6662194 | Joao et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6705520 | Pitroda et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6716101 | Meadows et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6754636 | Walker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6769607 | Pitroda et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6778968 | Gulati | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782370 | Stack | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785661 | Mandler et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6847938 | Moore | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6847965 | Walker et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850907 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868392 | Ogasawara | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871140 | Florance et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871190 | Seymour et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876974 | Marsh et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6876977 | Marks | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6876982 | Lancaster | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6876983 | Goddard | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6877655 | Robertson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6877665 | Challa et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6915275 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6925446 | Watanabe | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928416 | Bertash | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934690 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6954734 | Kuelbs et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6985879 | Walker et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990467 | Kwan | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6992794 | Keane et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7013286 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7039603 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047206 | Schultze | May 2006 | B1 |
7062452 | Lotvin et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065494 | Evans | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069228 | Rose et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072849 | Filepp et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7072853 | Shkedi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076447 | Peyser et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7080030 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082408 | Baumann et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7103565 | Vaid | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107225 | McClung, III | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107226 | Cassidy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120592 | Lewis | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124099 | Mesaros | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124107 | Pishevar et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7133835 | Fusz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143057 | Kuelbs et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146330 | Alon et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7165045 | Kim-E | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181419 | Mesaros | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194427 | Van Horn et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194442 | Flanagan et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7213754 | Eglen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7240021 | Walker et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7243082 | Forlai | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254833 | Cornelius et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7263498 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7263505 | Forlai | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7296001 | Ephrati et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7330826 | Porat et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343317 | Jokinen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7349890 | Pathak et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7363246 | Van Horn et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7364086 | Mesaros | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376613 | Cofino et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7379899 | Junger | May 2008 | B1 |
7415428 | Garwood | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415617 | Ginter et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7433832 | Bezos et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7464051 | Heggem | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7467103 | Murray et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7475024 | Phan | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7480627 | Van Horn et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7496543 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7516089 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7523045 | Walker et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7539742 | Spector | May 2009 | B2 |
7542927 | Mukai | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552069 | Kepecs | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7577582 | Ojha et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7584146 | Duhon | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7593871 | Mesaros | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596509 | Bryson | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7599857 | Bishop et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606731 | McClung, III | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624044 | Wren | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7630919 | Obrecht | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7636672 | Angles et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7672870 | Haines et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680696 | Murray | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689463 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7689468 | Walker et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689469 | Mesaros | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693748 | Mesaros | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7698173 | Burge et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7698208 | Hirani et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698240 | Chatterjee et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7706838 | Atsmon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725350 | Schlee | May 2010 | B2 |
7729977 | Xiao et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747473 | Mesaros | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7792699 | Kwei | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7801803 | Forlai | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7813955 | Ariff et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814106 | Guido et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814114 | Mi et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7815114 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818212 | Mesaros | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7860776 | Chin et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7890373 | Junger | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899707 | Mesaros | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7912761 | Vaid | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917386 | Christensen | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917416 | Quinn et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7937288 | Blaser et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7942316 | Bennett et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7953730 | Bleckner et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7958007 | Urbanski et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8005747 | Forlai | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8015583 | Bates et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024226 | Fusz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032409 | Mikurak | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8032422 | Pickard et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8036941 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8073762 | Sheth et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8140402 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8140405 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140442 | Heyer | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140615 | Miller et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150735 | Walker et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160931 | Mesaros | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8196811 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8219460 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8249942 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271327 | Walker et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271332 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8285598 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8285600 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8306870 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8311896 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8341035 | Mesaros | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8401918 | Mesaros | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8438075 | Mesaros | May 2013 | B2 |
8473353 | Matsuda et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8489466 | Van Horn et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8494914 | Mesaros | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494915 | Mesaros | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8533002 | Mesaros | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8567672 | Mesaros | Oct 2013 | |
20010011264 | Kawasaki | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014868 | Herz et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018660 | Sehr | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010039514 | Barenbaum et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044751 | Pugliese, III et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047296 | Wyker | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047311 | Singh | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020004765 | Han et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007324 | Centner et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026351 | Coleman | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032573 | Williams et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035536 | Gellman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020040352 | McCormick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046105 | Gardenswartz et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046147 | Livesay et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052782 | Landesmann | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065762 | Lee et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065769 | Irribarren et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069079 | Vega | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080950 | Koko et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082881 | Price et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091580 | Wang | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099643 | Abeshouse et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103741 | Boies et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107773 | Abdou | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116282 | Martin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143692 | Heimermann et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147670 | Lange | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165771 | Walker et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165821 | Tree | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169759 | Kraft et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174051 | Wise | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188508 | Lee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004802 | Callegari | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004808 | Elhaoussine et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030004823 | Sagy | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028473 | Eso et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041002 | Hao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055774 | Ginsberg | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088494 | Lee | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093355 | Issa | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109949 | Ikeda | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030111531 | Williams et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115100 | Teicher | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126040 | Mesaros | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126250 | Jhanji | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149619 | Stanley et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167222 | Mehrotra et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195832 | Cao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200150 | Westcott et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208412 | Hillestad et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216960 | Postrel | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233276 | Pearlman et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233557 | Zimmerman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015415 | Cofino et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019646 | Zweben et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039661 | Fuzell-Casey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039677 | Mura et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040093276 | Nishio | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128197 | Bam et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040215467 | Coffman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215500 | Monahan | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050021400 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021401 | Postrel | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038713 | Pickard et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050149458 | Eglen et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171918 | Eden et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197857 | Avery | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216337 | Roberts et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050272442 | Miller et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273415 | Mathews et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036491 | Leung et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060059062 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069619 | Walker et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095327 | Vaughn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095366 | Sheth et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106678 | Walker et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129454 | Moon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143080 | Garg et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060178918 | Mikurak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060259421 | Maass | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070150349 | Handel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070206584 | Fulling et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220169 | Silver et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080015711 | Charland et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052750 | Grunnet-Jepsen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071634 | Rampell et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082418 | Fordyce et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126201 | Ullah | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147534 | Ephrati et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080249846 | Yonemoto et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255886 | Unkefer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090055328 | Bamford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059856 | Kermoal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083136 | Blackwood | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089177 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150218 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090187455 | Fernandes et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198622 | Temte et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090276305 | Clopp | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307073 | MirrokniBanadaki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319359 | Soza et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327034 | Peterson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327038 | Peterson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327101 | Sayed | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327140 | Kuo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100088174 | Cohagan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100125525 | Inamdar | May 2010 | A1 |
20100169161 | Sacco | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110004515 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110016010 | Mesaros | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040624 | Jhanji | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110125592 | Mesaros | May 2011 | A1 |
20110213648 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213649 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213650 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110213653 | Mesaros | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238476 | Carr et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246271 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110246274 | Mesaros | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264499 | Abendroth et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270699 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110270700 | Mesaros | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120022970 | Mesaros | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029993 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120029995 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120035999 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036000 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120036031 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041811 | Mesaros | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054012 | Mesaros | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120158475 | Mesaros | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158479 | Raisch | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179526 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179530 | Mesaros | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197705 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197722 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203603 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203611 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120203615 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209683 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209737 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209738 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209739 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209740 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209743 | Mesaros | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226541 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245993 | Mesaros | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253912 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120253977 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265590 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265600 | Mesaros | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278157 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120284110 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290395 | Mesaros | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120310738 | Mesaros | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006741 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013385 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013388 | Mesaros | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130080282 | Mesaros | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130117086 | Mesaros | May 2013 | A1 |
20130246122 | Mesaros | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246223 | Mesaros | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200050970 | Aug 2000 | EP |
11-184910 | Jul 1999 | JP |
WO 9821713 | May 1998 | WO |
0070424 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 2008083371 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Accompany: How it Works: “Anatomy of a Buy-Cycle”, Jun. 15, 1999, pp. 1-3. |
Amazon.com, “Help/Shipping”, Archived on Feb. 2, 2003 by www.archive.org. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 9 pages. |
Ashton Technology Group, Inc. Announces NASDAQ National Market System Listing; Enters into Clearing Arrangements with 8 National Brokerage Firms, Business Wire, Jan. 3, 2000. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—m0EIN/is—2000—Jan—3/ai—58429780/print. Last accessed Apr. 8, 2009, 3 pages. |
Blyth, et al. Merchandising System Collecting Data. Derwent Information Ltd. Last accessed Jan. 20, 2009, 2 pages. |
Breyer. “Bargains in Cyberspace,” National Home Center News, vol. 26, No. 21, p. 21, Nov. 20, 2000. |
Business Editors. “Weatherchem Announces Major eCommerce Success with eWinWin”, Aug. 9, 2001, Business Wire, (p. 1) 2 pages. |
Business Editors and High Tech Writers, “eWinWin Announces the Release of DAS 3.0, the Next Generation of B2B Demand Aggregation Solutions” Dec. 28, 2000, Businee wire, p. 1 (4 pages). |
Cbot, “Trading in Futures Can Provide Considerable Financial Rewards”, Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 41 pages. |
Chicago Board of Trade, “Knowledge Center,” as archived by Archive.org, on Feb. 13, 2003. |
Computer Geeks Discount Outlet, “Order Status,” Mar. 1, 2002. |
Deierlein. “Smart Fuel Buying,” Fleet Equipment, vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 42-44, Aug. 1998. |
Edwards. “Increase Your Bottom Line : Automated Customer Service and Marketing,” E-Business Advisor, vol. 17, No. 7, p. 30, Jul. 1999. |
Enos. Vying to be the Top Dog. Upside vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 160-165, Mar. 2000. |
eWinWin, “eCommerce Redefined : The Positive Impact of eWinWin's Demand Aggregation System on the Manufacturing Supply Chain”, Oct. 2000. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 11 pages. |
“Excite@Home Standardizes on Siebel eBusiness; Leading Broadband Media Company Relies on Siebel Systems to Manage Customer Relationships Across its Entire Family of Services,” Business Wire, Jan. 19, 2000. |
Gaonkar, et al. Strategic Sourcing and Collaborative Planning in Internet Enabled Supply Chain Networks Producing Multigeneration Products. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 2, issue 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 54-66. |
“Global Real Estate Markets Spell Opportunity, Experts Tell Realtors,” PR Newswire, Nov. 21, 1991. |
Gurley. Creating a Great E-Commerce Business. Fortune, Mar. 16, 1998. |
Yeh, et al. “Optimal Production Run Length for Products Sold with Warranty,” (Abstract only), European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 575-582, Feb. 1, 2000. |
Meridex Introduces Advanced Features to its B2B Network, PR Newswire, May 25, 2000. http://www.canadait.com/cfm/index.cfm?It=106&Id=3421&Se=355&Sv=Company&Lo=441. Last accessed Apr. 30, 2009, 3 pages. |
MobShop Launches New Rev of Selling App, Online Reporter, May 28, 2001. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—hb5932/is—200105/ai—n23884526/. Last accessed Apr. 30, 2009, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT Application No. PCT/US 07/89195, mailed May 12, 2008, 8 pages. |
Koenig, et al. Quantitative Industrial Ecology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, Issue 1, Feb. 1998, pp. 16-28. |
Lamparter. “Natural Selection.” American Printer, vol. 217, No. 3, pp. 54-64, Jun. 1996. |
“Lucent Launches On-Line Catalog” M2 Presswire, Jan. 22, 1999. |
Magna Cash Cybersource Partner to Expand Online Payment Options. PR Newswire, New York, Jan. 15. |
Maxwell, Pricing education in the United States of America: responding to the needs of business, The Journal of Product & Brand Management, Santa Barbara, Aug. 1998, vol. 7, Issue 4, p. 336-341. |
Mesaros. Innovation in Difficult Times : How US Manufacturers are Using Demand Aggregation to Increase Sales and Lower Costs. Jul. 26, 2001. Last accessed Mar. 19, 2008, 4 pages. |
Meriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, 1997, p. 732. |
Moody. From E-Commerce to We-Commerce. Computer Weekly, 42, Jun. 3, 1999. Last accessed Apr. 9, 2009, 2 pages. |
Myers. “E-Solutions for Surplus Inventory,” Dsn Retailing Today, vol. 39, No. 21, p. 13, Nov. 6, 2000. |
Nellore, et al. Factors Influencing Success in Integrated Product Development (IPD) Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 48, issue 2, May 2001, pp. 164-174. |
OA Dated Oct. 20, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 11 pages. |
OA Dated Oct. 27, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/464,376, 13 pages. |
OA Dated Nov. 3, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/150,920, 161 pages. |
OA Dated Oct. 29, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462, 27 pages. |
OA Dated Apr. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 33 pages. |
OA Dated Mar. 25, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/556,604, 59 pages. |
OA Dated Apr. 10, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/351,069, 27 pages. |
Rahim, et al. Optimal Decision Rules for Determining the Length of Production Run, (Abstract Only), Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 195-202, 1985. |
Rahim, et al. “Optimal Production Run for a Process Having Multilevel Tool Wear,” (Abstract only), International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 139-149, 1988. |
Rahim, et al. “Optimal Production Run for a Process with Random Linear Drift,” (Abstract only), Omega, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 347-351, 1988. |
“Screen Savers,” Lawyer, Feb. 19, 2001. |
Sivakumar, et al. Price Match Guarantees: Rationale, Implementation, and Consumer Response. Pricing Strategy and Practice, Bradford, 1996, vol. 4, issue 4, 11 pgs. Recovered from ProQuest Database Aug. 25, 2006. |
Sjostrom. Price Discrimination by Shipping Conferences. Logistics and Transportation Review, Jun. 1992, [from Dialog® File 15, Acc.No. 00727777 93-76998]. |
Stacklin. “Bridgestone Printing Unit Teams with ewinwin”, Mar. 25, 2002, Crain's Cleveland Business, vol. 23, issue 12, 3 pages. |
Tanaka. “As Other Companies Crumble, Ecount Carves Out Niche in Online-Payment Services.” Knight Rider Tribune News Service, Washington, Feb. 27, 2002. (Recovered from ProQuest Database Dec. 4, 2006.). |
“The Oil and Gas Asset Clearinghouse, a Pertoleum Place Company, to Host It's Second Exclusively Online Auction of Oil and Gas Properties on Aug. 14-16, 2000.” PR Newswire, p. 5591, Aug. 3, 2000, 2 pages. |
Thomas, et al. JIT: Strategies for Distant Suppliers (Abstract). Business, vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 36-39, Dec. 1990. |
Wayback Machine. “Searched for http://www.ewinwin.com/corp/ewinwinwhitepaper.pdf” , Oct. 2, 2008, Archive.org. |
Kantrow, American Express Sets a Three-Tier Pricing on Optima, Dialog: File 148 #05812190 (The Gale Group), American Banker, v157, n25, p. 1(2), Feb. 6, 1992. |
OA Dated Feb. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/626,296, 11 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 29, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 19 pages. |
OA dated Jul. 2, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/426,063, 24 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 9, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/556,604, 60 pages. |
Mullich. Altrade Serves as a Natural Resource—A Head Start and Big Trading Volume Give the Natural Gas Marketplace a Competitive Edge. Can it Last? Information Week, 152, Jun. 12, 2000, 3 pages. |
China—Welcome to the Machine: New Machinery, Electronics B-to-B Website Launched. China Online, Jul. 24, 2000, 1 page. |
DomainTradeLIVE! Launched by solutionhome.com. Business Wire, Oct. 20, 1999, 1 page. |
Beaty. Mass Customisation. Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 75, issue 5, Oct. 1996, pp. 217-220. |
Easley, et al. Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment, Journal of Finance, vol. 47, No. 2, Jun. 1992. http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v47y1992i2p576-605.html. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 30 pages. |
Medrano, et al. Strategic Behaviour and Price Discovery, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 32, No. 2, Jun. 21, 2001. https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje—online.cgi?action=view&year=2001&issue=sum&page=221&&tid=83197&sc=uogfbloa. Last accessed Sep. 3, 2009, 29 pages. |
MobShop Selected by WHN(TM) (WhatsHotNow.com (R), Inc.) to Power Demand Aggregation Within Its Licensed Merchandise Marketplace; Demand Aggregation Technology Enables Marketplaces to Improve Liquidity by Generating Volume Transactions, PR Newswire, San Francisco, Jan. 16, 2001. http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/4291613-1.html. |
O'Gorman, et al. Considerations for Connecting Renewable Generation into Bulk Supply Networks. Sixth International Conference on Advances in Power System Control, Operation and Management, ASDCOM 2003, vol. 2, Nov. 11-14, pp. 674-680. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 7 pages. |
Scott. Chains of Trust, Supply Chain Management, Manufacturing Engineer, vol. 75, issue 4, Aug. 1996, pp. 172-174. |
Scott. Supply Partnerships in the Aerospace Industry. Transforming Your Material Flow: A Practical Insight Into World Class Logistics and Supply Chain Management IEE Colloquium on, Oct. 24, 1996, pp. 3/1-3/3. |
Scott. Supply Partnerships and the Effective Management of Low Cost Components. Transforming Your Material Flow: A Practical Insight Into World Class Logistics and Supply Chain Management IEE Colloquium on, Mar. 19, 1996, pp. 2/1-2/4. |
Watson. The Effects of Demand Forecast Fluctuations on Customer Service and Inventory Cost When Demand is Lumpy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 75-82, Jan. 1987. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v38/n1/abs/jors19879a.html. Last accessed Sep. 10, 2009, 8 pages. |
Dibiase. The Inventory Simulator: A Micro Computer Based Inventory Model. Modeling and Simulation on Microcomputers, Paul F. Hogan, ed., Society for Computer Simulation (SCS), La Jolla, pp. 104-106, Jan. 1987. |
OA dated Oct. 28, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 37 pages. |
OA dated Oct. 6, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/042,051, 53 pages. |
OA dated Nov. 27, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 43 pages. |
Jonsson, et al. Impact of Processing and Queueing Times on Order Quantities. Mater. Flow, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 221-230, Aug. 1985. |
Market Engineering Research for Structural Impacts of e-Business in the European Chemicals Industry (Ch. 3), Structural Impact of e-Business on the Chemicals Industry, Frost & Sullivan, Market Research Report, Jun. 2001. |
OA dated Feb. 23, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/426,063, 11 pages. |
OA dated Mar. 19, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462, 26 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 16, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/042,051, 32 pages. |
OA dated Apr. 29, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/464,585, 16 pages. |
“Supplier pricing and lot sizing when demand is price sensitive”. Abad, P.L. Fac. of Bus., McMaster Univ., Hamilton, Ont., Canada. European Journal of Operational Research , vol. 78, No. 3, p. 334-54. Date: Nov. 10, 1994 [recovered from Dialog on Oct. 20, 2009]. 1 page. |
Efficient bid pricing based on costing methods for Internet bid systems Sung Eun Park; Yong Kyu Lee. Dept. of Comput. Eng., Dongguk Univ., South Korea. Book Title: Web Information Systems-WISE 2006. 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 42) [recovered from Dialog on ]. 1 page. |
Swartz, Wireless Ads: Loved/Loathed. Wireless Review. © 2006 The Gale Group. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 3 pages. |
Mack, Going Local. © 2006 ProQuest Info&Learning. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
OA dated Oct. 21, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,513, 62 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 3, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418, 125 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 17, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412, 97 pages. |
De Gheest, Computer Implemented Electronic Bidding for Electronic Sales Application. Derwent Acc No. 2001-006585, © 2010 Derwent Information Ltd. Last accessed Sep. 17, 2010, 2 pages. |
OA mailed Mar. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,778, 38 pages. |
OA mailed Jan. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923, 48 pages. |
OA mailed Feb. 23, 2011for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412, 27 pages. |
OA mailed Feb. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 33 pages. |
OA mailed Mar. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418, 22 pages. |
OA dated Aug. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923, 32 pages. |
OA dated Jul. 28, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/704,280, 55 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 2, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431, 24 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884, 31 pages. |
OA dated Sep. 21, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,622, 52 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,681 Office Action mailed Jun. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,412 Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2012. |
Amazon.com, “Earths Biggest Selection,” Jun. 30, 2001, archived by Archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20010630130618/http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/subst/home/home.html. |
Anon., “ELCOM: Virgin Trains Cuts Procurement Costs with elcom.com; New Electronic Ordering System Offers Personalised Pricing,” M2 Presswire, Jul. 18, 2000. |
Anon., “Open Market Introduces New Software for Dynamic Web-Based Commerce” PR Newswire, Oct. 1, 1996. |
Boroshok, Jon, “Wireless, Location-Based, Shopping Portal being Tested in New York City and San Francisco by GeePS.com, Inc.,” published Apr. 3, 2000, New York, NY and San Francisco, CA; as downloaded from http://www.techmarcom.com/geeps.html on Jan. 6, 2012. |
Business/High Tech Editors “Mercata Launches Compelling Alternative to Online Auctions,” Business Wire, Nov. 15, 2000. |
ebay.com “eBay Services: The Feedback Forum,” Aug. 1, 2001, archived by archive.org: “http://web.arch ive.org/web/20010801145144/http://pages.ebay.com/services/forum/feedback.html”. |
Garner, K., “Culture Vulture: Up from Under—Germaine Greer,” Off our Backs, Jun. 24, 1971, vol. 1, Iss. 23, p. 14. |
Ha, Sung Ho et al., “Matching Buyers and Suppliers: An Intelligent Dynamic-Exchange Model,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2001. |
Hinze, Annika et al., “Location- and Time-Based Information Delivery in Tourism,” as downloaded Apr. 20, 2012 from http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/voisard/Papers/sstd03.pdf. |
IEEE Xplore Search Results, Aug. 12, 2007. |
Kauffman et al., “Bid Together Buy Together, On the Efficacy of Group-Buying Business models in Internet-based Selling,” May 16, 2001. |
Mercata.com “How to Ship an Order” Oct. 22, 2000, archived by archive.org: http://web.archive.org/web/20001022035135/http://www.mercata.com/cgi-bin/mercata/mercata/v1/pages/editorial.jsp?name=Ship+an+Order. |
Mercata.com, archived by archive.org on or before Jun. 19, 2000. |
Millman, H., “Legacy Data Links Shrinks Costs,” InfoWorld, vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 51, 56, Jan. 5, 1998. |
Rajaraman, Rajesh et al., “The Effect of Demand Elasticity on Security Prices for the Poolco and Multi-Lateral Contract Models,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, No. 3, Aug. 1997. |
Rozic, Jeff “Who's Watching While You Surf?” Inside Business 3, 5, 64, May 2001. |
Tippr http://www.tipper.com/ Internet Archive (Feb. 29, 2008)—http://web.archive.org/web/20080229121727/http://tippr.com/. |
WHN Selects MobShop to Power Aggregated Buying for WHN Exchange. Jan. 23, 2001. http://www.allbusiness.com/retail-trade/4291613-1.html. Last accessed Sep. 11, 2009, 2 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Mar. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,622 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/710,095 Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,192 Office Action mailed Apr. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed Feb. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,128 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,387 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,147 Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2012. |
Adam et al. “Strategic Directions in Electronic Commerce and Digital Libraries: Towards a Digital Agora”. ACM Computing Surveys [Online] 1996, vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 818-835. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,464 Office Action mailed May 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/922,884 Office Action mailed May 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,144 Office Action mailed May 16, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Appeal Per Curiam Decision dated Oct. 9, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Reply Brief of Appellant dated Jun. 4, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Brief of Appellee dated May 17, 2012. |
eWinWin, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc. Brief of Appellant dated Apr. 2, 2012. |
Order re Motion for Summary Judgment dated Nov. 23, 2011. |
eWinWin, Inc.'s Opposition to Groupon, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement dated Nov. 8, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringment dated Oct. 17, 2011. |
Order re eWinWin, Inc. Motion for Reconsideration dated Oct. 3, 2011. |
Order re Claim Construction dated Sep. 5, 2011. |
eWinWin, Inc. Supplemental Brief in Support of Claim Construction dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Supplemental Claim Construction Brief dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
eWinWin, Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Claim Construction dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief dated Aug. 5, 2011. |
Groupon, Inc.'s Opening Claim Constructin Brief dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
Opening Claim Construction Brief of eWinWin, Inc.dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,054 Final Office Action mailed Nov. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Dec. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,275 Office Action mailed Oct. 4, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,276 Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,658 Office Action mailed Oct. 30, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,647 Office Action mailed Dec. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,512 Office Action mailed Dec. 10, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,040 Office Action mailed Nov. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Office Action mailed Dec. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Office Action mailed Sep. 12, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Final Office Action mailed Oct. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/345,681 Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Office Action mailed Dec. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,302 Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,387 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 15, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/618,418 Final Office Action mailed Jul. 26, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/517/528 Office Action mailed Dec. 6, 2012. |
Mercata.com, “Our Privacy Policy”, Archived by Archive.org on or before May 26, 2000. |
Mercata.com, “Special Offers”, Archived by Archive.org on or before Jun. 19, 2000. |
Mercata.com, “Terms of Use”, Published by Mercata.com, Nov. 6, 2000. |
We-Commerce.com, “The We-Commerce™ Network Mission”, Archived by Archive.org on or before Oct. 23, 2000. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/104,723 Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/269,360 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/275,054 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/292,971 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2003. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,275 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/449,276 Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/452,647 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,478 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 29, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,478 Office Action mailed Dec. 20, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,512 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Office Action mailed Feb. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,449 Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/491,449 Office Action mailed Dec. 19, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/525,040 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 18, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/407,622 Final Office Action mailed Apr. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,806 Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,806 Office Action mailed Jan. 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Office Action mailed May 10, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/251,668 Final Office Action mailed Dec. 24, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/609,250 Office Action mailed Jan. 3, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Office Action mailed Apr. 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,213 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462 Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,128 Office Action mailed May 23, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/160,176 Office Action mailed Apr. 19, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/538,302 Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,147 Final Office Action mailed Jan. 9, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431 Office Action mailed Mar. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/517/528 Office Action mailed May 8, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,809 Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2013. |
OA dated Apr. 6, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,513, 38 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/681,403 Office Action mailed Aug. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/270,133 Office Action mailed Jun. 21, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/523,820 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,154 Office Action mailed Aug. 28, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/881,923 Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/621,158 Office Action mailed Oct. 11, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,441 Office Action mailed May 31, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/152,462 Final Office Action mailed Aug. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/704,151 Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,387 Office Action mailed Jun. 4, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/680,431 Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/584,809 Office Action mailed Jul. 24, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10867625 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11680415 | US |