The present technology pertains to network traffic flow stitching and flow stitching network traffic flow segments across middleboxes in a network environment.
Currently, sensors deployed in a network can be used to gather network traffic data related to nodes operating in the network. The network traffic data can include metadata relating to a packet, a collection of packets, a flow, a bidirectional flow, a group of flows, a session, or a network communication of another granularity. That is, the network traffic data can generally include any information describing communication on all layers of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model. For example, the network traffic data can include source/destination MAC address, source/destination IP address, protocol, port number, etc. In some embodiments, the network traffic data can also include summaries of network activity or other network statistics such as number of packets, number of bytes, number of flows, bandwidth usage, response time, latency, packet loss, jitter, and other network statistics.
Gathered network traffic data can be analyzed to provide insights into the operation of the nodes in the network, otherwise referred to as analytics. In particular, discovered application or inventories, application dependencies, policies, efficiencies, resource and bandwidth usage, and network flows can be determined for the network using the network traffic data.
Sensors deployed in a network can be used to gather network traffic data on a client and server level of granularity. For example, network traffic data can be gathered for determining which clients are communicating which servers and vice versa. However, sensors are not currently deployed or integrated with systems to gather network traffic data for different segments of traffic flows forming the traffic flows between a server and a client. Specifically, current sensors gather network traffic data as traffic flows directly between a client and a server while ignoring which nodes, e.g. middleboxes, the traffic flows actually pass through in passing between a server and a client. More specifically, current sensors are not configured to gather network traffic data as traffic flows pass through multiple middleboxes between a server and a client. This effectively treats the network environment between servers and clients as a black box and leads to gaps in network traffic data and traffic flows indicated by the network traffic data.
In turn, such gaps in network traffic data and corresponding traffic flows can lead to deficiencies in diagnosing problems within a network environment. For example, a problem stemming from an incorrectly configured middlebox might be diagnosed as occurring at a client as the flow between the client and a server is treated as a black box even though it actually passes through one or more middleboxes. In another example, gaps in network traffic data between a server and a client can lead to an inability to determine whether policies are correctly enforced at middleboxes between the server and the client. There therefore exist needs for systems, methods, and computer-readable media for generating network traffic data at nodes between servers and clients, e.g. at multiple middleboxes in a chain of middleboxes between the servers and clients. In particular, there exist needs for systems, methods, and computer-readable media for stitching together traffic flows that pass through multiple nodes between servers and clients to generate more complete and detailed traffic flows, e.g. between the servers and the clients.
In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations can be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Thus, the following description and drawings are illustrative and are not to be construed as limiting. Numerous specific details are described to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However, in certain instances, well-known or conventional details are not described in order to avoid obscuring the description. References to one or an embodiment in the present disclosure can be references to the same embodiment or any embodiment; and, such references mean at least one of the embodiments.
Reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the disclosure. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which can be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the disclosure, and in the specific context where each term is used. Alternative language and synonyms can be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, and no special significance should be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. In some cases, synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and is not intended to further limit the scope and meaning of the disclosure or of any example term. Likewise, the disclosure is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
Without intent to limit the scope of the disclosure, examples of instruments, apparatus, methods and their related results according to the embodiments of the present disclosure are given below. Note that titles or subtitles can be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the disclosure. Unless otherwise defined, technical and scientific terms used herein have the meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control.
Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by the practice of the principles set forth herein.
Overview
A method can include collecting flow records of traffic flow segments at both a first middlebox and a second middlebox in a network environment corresponding to one or more traffic flows passing through either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox. The flow records can include one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flows. Sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox can be identified using the flow records. The method can include stitching together a subset of the traffic flow segments to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the first middlebox. Additionally, the method can include stitching together another subset of the traffic flow segments to form a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the second middlebox. The first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow can be stitched together to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow across the first middlebox and the second middlebox. Subsequently, the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow can be incorporated as part of network traffic data for the network environment.
A system can collect flow records of traffic flow segments at both a first middlebox and a second middlebox in a network environment corresponding to one or more traffic flows passing through either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox. The flow records can include one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flows. The system can identify sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox using the flow records. A subset of the traffic flow segments can be stitched together to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the first middlebox. Additionally, the system can stitch together another subset of the traffic flow segments to form a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the second middlebox. The first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow can be stitched together to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow across the first middlebox and the second middlebox.
A system can collect flow records of traffic flow segments at both a first middlebox and a second middlebox in a network environment corresponding to one or more traffic flows passing through either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox. The flow records can include one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flows. The system can identify sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox using the flow records. A subset of the traffic flow segments can be stitched together to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the first middlebox. Additionally, the system can stitch together another subset of the traffic flow segments, including common traffic flow segments with the subset of the traffic flow segments, to form a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the second middlebox. The first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow can be stitched together to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow across the first middlebox and the second middlebox.
The disclosed technology addresses the need in the art for monitoring network environments, e.g. to diagnose and prevent problems in the network environment. The present technology involves system, methods, and computer-readable media for stitching together traffic flows across nodes between servers and clients to provide more detailed network traffic data, e.g. for diagnosing and preventing problems in a network environment.
The present technology will be described in the following disclosure as follows. The discussion begins with an introductory discussion of network traffic data collection and a description of an example network traffic monitoring system and an example network environment, as shown in
Sensors implemented in networks are traditionally limited to collecting packet data at networking devices. In some embodiments, networks can be configured with sensors at multiple points, including on networking devices (e.g., switches, routers, gateways, firewalls, deep packet inspectors, traffic monitors, load balancers, etc.), physical servers, hypervisors or shared kernels, virtual partitions (e.g., VMs or containers), and other network elements. This can provide a more comprehensive view of the network. Further, network traffic data (e.g., flows) can be associated with, or otherwise include, host and/or endpoint data (e.g., host/endpoint name, operating system, CPU usage, network usage, disk space, logged users, scheduled jobs, open files, information regarding files stored on a host/endpoint, etc.), process data (e.g., process name, ID, parent process ID, path, CPU utilization, memory utilization, etc.), user data (e.g., user name, ID, login time, etc.), and other collectible data to provide more insight into network activity.
Sensors implemented in a network at multiple points can be used to collect data for nodes grouped together into a cluster. Nodes can be clustered together, or otherwise a cluster of nodes can be identified using one or a combination of applicable network operation factors. For example, endpoints performing similar workloads, communicating with a similar set of endpoints or networking devices, having similar network and security limitations (i.e., policies), and sharing other attributes can be clustered together.
In some embodiments, a cluster can be determined based on early fusion in which feature vectors of each node comprise the union of individual feature vectors across multiple domains. For example, a feature vector can include a packet header-based feature (e.g., destination network address for a flow, port, etc.) concatenated to an aggregate flow-based feature (e.g., the number of packets in the flow, the number of bytes in the flow, etc.). A cluster can then be defined as a set of nodes whose respective concatenated feature vectors are determined to exceed specified similarity thresholds (or fall below specified distance thresholds).
In some embodiments, a cluster can be defined based on late fusion in which each node can be represented as multiple feature vectors of different data types or domains. In such systems, a cluster can be a set of nodes whose similarity (and/or distance measures) across different domains, satisfy specified similarity (and/or distance) conditions for each domain. For example, a first node can be defined by a first network information-based feature vector and a first process-based feature vector while a second node can be defined by a second network information-based feature vector and a second process-based feature vector. The nodes can be determined to form a cluster if their corresponding network-based feature vectors are similar to a specified degree and their corresponding process-based feature vectors are only a specified distance apart.
Referring now to the drawings,
The configuration manager 102 can be used to provision and maintain the sensors 104, including installing sensor software or firmware in various nodes of a network, configuring the sensors 104, updating the sensor software or firmware, among other sensor management tasks. For example, the sensors 104 can be implemented as virtual partition images (e.g., virtual machine (VM) images or container images), and the configuration manager 102 can distribute the images to host machines. In general, a virtual partition can be an instance of a VM, container, sandbox, or other isolated software environment. The software environment can include an operating system and application software. For software running within a virtual partition, the virtual partition can appear to be, for example, one of many servers or one of many operating systems executed on a single physical server. The configuration manager 102 can instantiate a new virtual partition or migrate an existing partition to a different physical server. The configuration manager 102 can also be used to configure the new or migrated sensor.
The configuration manager 102 can monitor the health of the sensors 104. For example, the configuration manager 102 can request for status updates and/or receive heartbeat messages, initiate performance tests, generate health checks, and perform other health monitoring tasks. In some embodiments, the configuration manager 102 can also authenticate the sensors 104. For instance, the sensors 104 can be assigned a unique identifier, such as by using a one-way hash function of a sensor's basic input/out system (BIOS) universally unique identifier (UUID) and a secret key stored by the configuration image manager 102. The UUID can be a large number that can be difficult for a malicious sensor or other device or component to guess. In some embodiments, the configuration manager 102 can keep the sensors 104 up to date by installing the latest versions of sensor software and/or applying patches. The configuration manager 102 can obtain these updates automatically from a local source or the Internet.
The sensors 104 can reside on various nodes of a network, such as a virtual partition (e.g., VM or container) 120; a hypervisor or shared kernel managing one or more virtual partitions and/or physical servers 122, an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) 124 of a switch, router, gateway, or other networking device, or a packet capture (pcap) 126 appliance (e.g., a standalone packet monitor, a device connected to a network devices monitoring port, a device connected in series along a main trunk of a datacenter, or similar device), or other element of a network. The sensors 104 can monitor network traffic between nodes, and send network traffic data and corresponding data (e.g., host data, process data, user data, etc.) to the collectors 106 for storage. For example, the sensors 104 can sniff packets being sent over its hosts' physical or virtual network interface card (NIC), or individual processes can be configured to report network traffic and corresponding data to the sensors 104. Incorporating the sensors 104 on multiple nodes and within multiple partitions of some nodes of the network can provide for robust capture of network traffic and corresponding data from each hop of data transmission. In some embodiments, each node of the network (e.g., VM, container, or other virtual partition 120, hypervisor, shared kernel, or physical server 122, ASIC 124, pcap 126, etc.) includes a respective sensor 104. However, it should be understood that various software and hardware configurations can be used to implement the sensor network 104.
As the sensors 104 capture communications and corresponding data, they can continuously send network traffic data to the collectors 106. The network traffic data can include metadata relating to a packet, a collection of packets, a flow, a bidirectional flow, a group of flows, a session, or a network communication of another granularity. That is, the network traffic data can generally include any information describing communication on all layers of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model. For example, the network traffic data can include source/destination MAC address, source/destination IP address, protocol, port number, etc. In some embodiments, the network traffic data can also include summaries of network activity or other network statistics such as number of packets, number of bytes, number of flows, bandwidth usage, response time, latency, packet loss, jitter, and other network statistics.
The sensors 104 can also determine additional data, included as part of gathered network traffic data, for each session, bidirectional flow, flow, packet, or other more granular or less granular network communication. The additional data can include host and/or endpoint information, virtual partition information, sensor information, process information, user information, tenant information, application information, network topology, application dependency mapping, cluster information, or other information corresponding to each flow.
In some embodiments, the sensors 104 can perform some preprocessing of the network traffic and corresponding data before sending the data to the collectors 106. For example, the sensors 104 can remove extraneous or duplicative data or they can create summaries of the data (e.g., latency, number of packets per flow, number of bytes per flow, number of flows, etc.). In some embodiments, the sensors 104 can be configured to only capture certain types of network information and disregard the rest. In some embodiments, the sensors 104 can be configured to capture only a representative sample of packets (e.g., every 1,000th packet or other suitable sample rate) and corresponding data.
Since the sensors 104 can be located throughout the network, network traffic and corresponding data can be collected from multiple vantage points or multiple perspectives in the network to provide a more comprehensive view of network behavior. The capture of network traffic and corresponding data from multiple perspectives rather than just at a single sensor located in the data path or in communication with a component in the data path, allows the data to be correlated from the various data sources, which can be used as additional data points by the analytics engine 110. Further, collecting network traffic and corresponding data from multiple points of view ensures more accurate data is captured. For example, a conventional sensor network can be limited to sensors running on external-facing network devices (e.g., routers, switches, network appliances, etc.) such that east-west traffic, including VM-to-VM or container-to-container traffic on a same host, may not be monitored. In addition, packets that are dropped before traversing a network device or packets containing errors cannot be accurately monitored by the conventional sensor network. The sensor network 104 of various embodiments substantially mitigates or eliminates these issues altogether by locating sensors at multiple points of potential failure. Moreover, the network traffic monitoring system 100 can verify multiple instances of data for a flow (e.g., source endpoint flow data, network device flow data, and endpoint flow data) against one another.
In some embodiments, the network traffic monitoring system 100 can assess a degree of accuracy of flow data sets from multiple sensors and utilize a flow data set from a single sensor determined to be the most accurate and/or complete. The degree of accuracy can be based on factors such as network topology (e.g., a sensor closer to the source can be more likely to be more accurate than a sensor closer to the destination), a state of a sensor or a node hosting the sensor (e.g., a compromised sensor/node can have less accurate flow data than an uncompromised sensor/node), or flow data volume (e.g., a sensor capturing a greater number of packets for a flow can be more accurate than a sensor capturing a smaller number of packets).
In some embodiments, the network traffic monitoring system 100 can assemble the most accurate flow data set and corresponding data from multiple sensors. For instance, a first sensor along a data path can capture data for a first packet of a flow but can be missing data for a second packet of the flow while the situation is reversed for a second sensor along the data path. The network traffic monitoring system 100 can assemble data for the flow from the first packet captured by the first sensor and the second packet captured by the second sensor.
As discussed, the sensors 104 can send network traffic and corresponding data to the collectors 106. In some embodiments, each sensor can be assigned to a primary collector and a secondary collector as part of a high availability scheme. If the primary collector fails or communications between the sensor and the primary collector are not otherwise possible, a sensor can send its network traffic and corresponding data to the secondary collector. In other embodiments, the sensors 104 are not assigned specific collectors but the network traffic monitoring system 100 can determine an optimal collector for receiving the network traffic and corresponding data through a discovery process. In such embodiments, a sensor can change where it sends it network traffic and corresponding data if its environments changes, such as if a default collector fails or if the sensor is migrated to a new location and it would be optimal for the sensor to send its data to a different collector. For example, it can be preferable for the sensor to send its network traffic and corresponding data on a particular path and/or to a particular collector based on latency, shortest path, monetary cost (e.g., using private resources versus a public resources provided by a public cloud provider), error rate, or some combination of these factors. In other embodiments, a sensor can send different types of network traffic and corresponding data to different collectors. For example, the sensor can send first network traffic and corresponding data related to one type of process to one collector and second network traffic and corresponding data related to another type of process to another collector.
The collectors 106 can be any type of storage medium that can serve as a repository for the network traffic and corresponding data captured by the sensors 104. In some embodiments, data storage for the collectors 106 is located in an in-memory database, such as dashDB from IBM®, although it should be appreciated that the data storage for the collectors 106 can be any software and/or hardware capable of providing rapid random access speeds typically used for analytics software. In various embodiments, the collectors 106 can utilize solid state drives, disk drives, magnetic tape drives, or a combination of the foregoing according to cost, responsiveness, and size requirements. Further, the collectors 106 can utilize various database structures such as a normalized relational database or a NoSQL database, among others.
In some embodiments, the collectors 106 can only serve as network storage for the network traffic monitoring system 100. In such embodiments, the network traffic monitoring system 100 can include a data mover module 108 for retrieving data from the collectors 106 and making the data available to network clients, such as the components of the analytics engine 110. In effect, the data mover module 108 can serve as a gateway for presenting network-attached storage to the network clients. In other embodiments, the collectors 106 can perform additional functions, such as organizing, summarizing, and preprocessing data. For example, the collectors 106 can tabulate how often packets of certain sizes or types are transmitted from different nodes of the network. The collectors 106 can also characterize the traffic flows going to and from various nodes. In some embodiments, the collectors 106 can match packets based on sequence numbers, thus identifying traffic flows and connection links. As it can be inefficient to retain all data indefinitely in certain circumstances, in some embodiments, the collectors 106 can periodically replace detailed network traffic data with consolidated summaries. In this manner, the collectors 106 can retain a complete dataset describing one period (e.g., the past minute or other suitable period of time), with a smaller dataset of another period (e.g., the previous 2-10 minutes or other suitable period of time), and progressively consolidate network traffic and corresponding data of other periods of time (e.g., day, week, month, year, etc.). In some embodiments, network traffic and corresponding data for a set of flows identified as normal or routine can be winnowed at an earlier period of time while a more complete data set can be retained for a lengthier period of time for another set of flows identified as anomalous or as an attack.
The analytics engine 110 can generate analytics using data collected by the sensors 104. Analytics generated by the analytics engine 110 can include applicable analytics of nodes or a cluster of nodes operating in a network. For example, analytics generated by the analytics engine 110 can include one or a combination of information related to flows of data through nodes, detected attacks on a network or nodes of a network, applications at nodes or distributed across the nodes, application dependency mappings for applications at nodes, policies implemented at nodes, and actual policies enforced at nodes.
Computer networks can be exposed to a variety of different attacks that expose vulnerabilities of computer systems in order to compromise their security. Some network traffic can be associated with malicious programs or devices. The analytics engine 110 can be provided with examples of network states corresponding to an attack and network states corresponding to normal operation. The analytics engine 110 can then analyze network traffic and corresponding data to recognize when the network is under attack. In some embodiments, the network can operate within a trusted environment for a period of time so that the analytics engine 110 can establish a baseline of normal operation. Since malware is constantly evolving and changing, machine learning can be used to dynamically update models for identifying malicious traffic patterns.
In some embodiments, the analytics engine 110 can be used to identify observations which differ from other examples in a dataset. For example, if a training set of example data with known outlier labels exists, supervised anomaly detection techniques can be used. Supervised anomaly detection techniques utilize data sets that have been labeled as normal and abnormal and train a classifier. In a case in which it is unknown whether examples in the training data are outliers, unsupervised anomaly techniques can be used. Unsupervised anomaly detection techniques can be used to detect anomalies in an unlabeled test data set under the assumption that the majority of instances in the data set are normal by looking for instances that seem to fit to the remainder of the data set.
The analytics engine 110 can include a data lake 130, an application dependency mapping (ADM) module 140, and elastic processing engines 150. The data lake 130 is a large-scale storage repository that provides massive storage for various types of data, enormous processing power, and the ability to handle nearly limitless concurrent tasks or jobs. In some embodiments, the data lake 130 is implemented using the Hadoop® Distributed File System (HDFS™) from Apache® Software Foundation of Forest Hill, Md. HDFS™ is a highly scalable and distributed file system that can scale to thousands of cluster nodes, millions of files, and petabytes of data. HDFS™ is optimized for batch processing where data locations are exposed to allow computations to take place where the data resides. HDFS™ provides a single namespace for an entire cluster to allow for data coherency in a write-once, read-many access model. That is, clients can only append to existing files in the node. In HDFS™, files are separated into blocks, which are typically 64 MB in size and are replicated in multiple data nodes. Clients access data directly from data nodes.
In some embodiments, the data mover 108 receives raw network traffic and corresponding data from the collectors 106 and distributes or pushes the data to the data lake 130. The data lake 130 can also receive and store out-of-band data 114, such as statuses on power levels, network availability, server performance, temperature conditions, cage door positions, and other data from internal sources, and third party data 116, such as security reports (e.g., provided by Cisco® Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif., Arbor Networks® of Burlington, Mass., Symantec® Corp. of Sunnyvale, Calif., Sophos® Group plc of Abingdon, England, Microsoft® Corp. of Seattle, Wash., Verizon® Communications, Inc. of New York, N.Y., among others), geolocation data, IP watch lists, Whois data, configuration management database (CMDB) or configuration management system (CMS) as a service, and other data from external sources. In other embodiments, the data lake 130 can instead fetch or pull raw traffic and corresponding data from the collectors 106 and relevant data from the out-of-band data sources 114 and the third party data sources 116. In yet other embodiments, the functionality of the collectors 106, the data mover 108, the out-of-band data sources 114, the third party data sources 116, and the data lake 130 can be combined. Various combinations and configurations are possible as would be known to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Each component of the data lake 130 can perform certain processing of the raw network traffic data and/or other data (e.g., host data, process data, user data, out-of-band data or third party data) to transform the raw data to a form useable by the elastic processing engines 150. In some embodiments, the data lake 130 can include repositories for flow attributes 132, host and/or endpoint attributes 134, process attributes 136, and policy attributes 138. In some embodiments, the data lake 130 can also include repositories for VM or container attributes, application attributes, tenant attributes, network topology, application dependency maps, cluster attributes, etc.
The flow attributes 132 relate to information about flows traversing the network. A flow is generally one or more packets sharing certain attributes that are sent within a network within a specified period of time. The flow attributes 132 can include packet header fields such as a source address (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP) address, Media Access Control (MAC) address, Domain Name System (DNS) name, or other network address), source port, destination address, destination port, protocol type, class of service, among other fields. The source address can correspond to a first endpoint (e.g., network device, physical server, virtual partition, etc.) of the network, and the destination address can correspond to a second endpoint, a multicast group, or a broadcast domain. The flow attributes 132 can also include aggregate packet data such as flow start time, flow end time, number of packets for a flow, number of bytes for a flow, the union of TCP flags for a flow, among other flow data.
The host and/or endpoint attributes 134 describe host and/or endpoint data for each flow, and can include host and/or endpoint name, network address, operating system, CPU usage, network usage, disk space, ports, logged users, scheduled jobs, open files, and information regarding files and/or directories stored on a host and/or endpoint (e.g., presence, absence, or modifications of log files, configuration files, device special files, or protected electronic information). As discussed, in some embodiments, the host and/or endpoints attributes 134 can also include the out-of-band data 114 regarding hosts such as power level, temperature, and physical location (e.g., room, row, rack, cage door position, etc.) or the third party data 116 such as whether a host and/or endpoint is on an IP watch list or otherwise associated with a security threat, Whois data, or geocoordinates. In some embodiments, the out-of-band data 114 and the third party data 116 can be associated by process, user, flow, or other more granular or less granular network element or network communication.
The process attributes 136 relate to process data corresponding to each flow, and can include process name (e.g., bash, httpd, netstat, etc.), ID, parent process ID, path (e.g., /usr2/username/bin/, /usr/local/bin, /usr/bin, etc.), CPU utilization, memory utilization, memory address, scheduling information, nice value, flags, priority, status, start time, terminal type, CPU time taken by the process, the command that started the process, and information regarding a process owner (e.g., user name, ID, user's real name, e-mail address, user's groups, terminal information, login time, expiration date of login, idle time, and information regarding files and/or directories of the user).
The policy attributes 138 contain information relating to network policies. Policies establish whether a particular flow is allowed or denied by the network as well as a specific route by which a packet traverses the network. Policies can also be used to mark packets so that certain kinds of traffic receive differentiated service when used in combination with queuing techniques such as those based on priority, fairness, weighted fairness, token bucket, random early detection, round robin, among others. The policy attributes 138 can include policy statistics such as a number of times a policy was enforced or a number of times a policy was not enforced. The policy attributes 138 can also include associations with network traffic data. For example, flows found to be non-conformant can be linked or tagged with corresponding policies to assist in the investigation of non-conformance.
The analytics engine 110 can include any number of engines 150, including for example, a flow engine 152 for identifying flows (e.g., flow engine 152) or an attacks engine 154 for identify attacks to the network. In some embodiments, the analytics engine can include a separate distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack engine 155 for specifically detecting DDoS attacks. In other embodiments, a DDoS attack engine can be a component or a sub-engine of a general attacks engine. In some embodiments, the attacks engine 154 and/or the DDoS engine 155 can use machine learning techniques to identify security threats to a network. For example, the attacks engine 154 and/or the DDoS engine 155 can be provided with examples of network states corresponding to an attack and network states corresponding to normal operation. The attacks engine 154 and/or the DDoS engine 155 can then analyze network traffic data to recognize when the network is under attack. In some embodiments, the network can operate within a trusted environment for a time to establish a baseline for normal network operation for the attacks engine 154 and/or the DDoS.
The analytics engine 110 can further include a search engine 156. The search engine 156 can be configured, for example to perform a structured search, an NLP (Natural Language Processing) search, or a visual search. Data can be provided to the engines from one or more processing components.
The analytics engine 110 can also include a policy engine 158 that manages network policy, including creating and/or importing policies, monitoring policy conformance and non-conformance, enforcing policy, simulating changes to policy or network elements affecting policy, among other policy-related tasks.
The ADM module 140 can determine dependencies of applications of the network. That is, particular patterns of traffic can correspond to an application, and the interconnectivity or dependencies of the application can be mapped to generate a graph for the application (i.e., an application dependency mapping). In this context, an application refers to a set of networking components that provides connectivity for a given set of workloads. For example, in a conventional three-tier architecture for a web application, first endpoints of the web tier, second endpoints of the application tier, and third endpoints of the data tier make up the web application. The ADM module 140 can receive input data from various repositories of the data lake 130 (e.g., the flow attributes 132, the host and/or endpoint attributes 134, the process attributes 136, etc.). The ADM module 140 can analyze the input data to determine that there is first traffic flowing between external endpoints on port 80 of the first endpoints corresponding to Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) requests and responses. The input data can also indicate second traffic between first ports of the first endpoints and second ports of the second endpoints corresponding to application server requests and responses and third traffic flowing between third ports of the second endpoints and fourth ports of the third endpoints corresponding to database requests and responses. The ADM module 140 can define an ADM for the web application as a three-tier application including a first EPG comprising the first endpoints, a second EPG comprising the second endpoints, and a third EPG comprising the third endpoints.
The presentation module 112 can include an application programming interface (API) or command line interface (CLI) 160, a security information and event management (SIEM) interface 162, and a web front-end 164. As the analytics engine 110 processes network traffic and corresponding data and generates analytics data, the analytics data may not be in a human-readable form or it can be too voluminous for a user to navigate. The presentation module 112 can take the analytics data generated by analytics engine 110 and further summarize, filter, and organize the analytics data as well as create intuitive presentations for the analytics data.
In some embodiments, the API or CLI 160 can be implemented using Hadoop® Hive from Apache® for the back end, and Java® Database Connectivity (JDBC) from Oracle® Corporation of Redwood Shores, Calif., as an API layer. Hive is a data warehouse infrastructure that provides data summarization and ad hoc querying. Hive provides a mechanism to query data using a variation of structured query language (SQL) that is called HiveQL. JDBC is an API for the programming language Java®, which defines how a client can access a database.
In some embodiments, the SIEM interface 162 can be implemented using Hadoop® Kafka for the back end, and software provided by Splunk®, Inc. of San Francisco, Calif. as the SIEM platform. Kafka is a distributed messaging system that is partitioned and replicated. Kafka uses the concept of topics. Topics are feeds of messages in specific categories. In some embodiments, Kafka can take raw packet captures and telemetry information from the data mover 108 as input, and output messages to a SIEM platform, such as Splunk®. The Splunk® platform is utilized for searching, monitoring, and analyzing machine-generated data.
In some embodiments, the web front-end 164 can be implemented using software provided by MongoDB®, Inc. of New York, N.Y. and Hadoop® ElasticSearch from Apache® for the back-end, and Ruby on Rails™ as the web application framework. MongoDB® is a document-oriented NoSQL database based on documents in the form of JavaScript® Object Notation (JSON) with dynamic schemas. ElasticSearch is a scalable and real-time search and analytics engine that provides domain-specific language (DSL) full querying based on JSON. Ruby on Rails™ is model-view-controller (MVC) framework that provides default structures for a database, a web service, and web pages. Ruby on Rails™ relies on web standards such as JSON or extensible markup language (XML) for data transfer, and hypertext markup language (HTML), cascading style sheets, (CSS), and JavaScript® for display and user interfacing.
Although
The network environment 200 can include a network fabric 202, a Layer 2 (L2) network 204, a Layer 3 (L3) network 206, and servers 208a, 208b, 208c, 208d, and 208e (collectively, 208). The network fabric 202 can include spine switches 210a, 210b, 210c, and 210d (collectively, “210”) and leaf switches 212a, 212b, 212c, 212d, and 212e (collectively, “212”). The spine switches 210 can connect to the leaf switches 212 in the network fabric 202. The leaf switches 212 can include access ports (or non-fabric ports) and fabric ports. The fabric ports can provide uplinks to the spine switches 210, while the access ports can provide connectivity to endpoints (e.g., the servers 208), internal networks (e.g., the L2 network 204), or external networks (e.g., the L3 network 206).
The leaf switches 212 can reside at the edge of the network fabric 202, and can thus represent the physical network edge. For instance, in some embodiments, the leaf switches 212d and 212e operate as border leaf switches in communication with edge devices 214 located in the external network 206. The border leaf switches 212d and 212e can be used to connect any type of external network device, service (e.g., firewall, deep packet inspector, traffic monitor, load balancer, etc.), or network (e.g., the L3 network 206) to the fabric 202.
Although the network fabric 202 is illustrated and described herein as an example leaf-spine architecture, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that various embodiments can be implemented based on any network topology, including any datacenter or cloud network fabric. Indeed, other architectures, designs, infrastructures, and variations are contemplated herein. For example, the principles disclosed herein are applicable to topologies including three-tier (including core, aggregation, and access levels), fat tree, mesh, bus, hub and spoke, etc. Thus, in some embodiments, the leaf switches 212 can be top-of-rack switches configured according to a top-of-rack architecture. In other embodiments, the leaf switches 212 can be aggregation switches in any particular topology, such as end-of-row or middle-of-row topologies. In some embodiments, the leaf switches 212 can also be implemented using aggregation switches.
Moreover, the topology illustrated in
Network communications in the network fabric 202 can flow through the leaf switches 212. In some embodiments, the leaf switches 212 can provide endpoints (e.g., the servers 208), internal networks (e.g., the L2 network 204), or external networks (e.g., the L3 network 206) access to the network fabric 202, and can connect the leaf switches 212 to each other. In some embodiments, the leaf switches 212 can connect endpoint groups (EPGs) to the network fabric 202, internal networks (e.g., the L2 network 204), and/or any external networks (e.g., the L3 network 206). EPGs are groupings of applications, or application components, and tiers for implementing forwarding and policy logic. EPGs can allow for separation of network policy, security, and forwarding from addressing by using logical application boundaries. EPGs can be used in the network environment 200 for mapping applications in the network. For example, EPGs can comprise a grouping of endpoints in the network indicating connectivity and policy for applications.
As discussed, the servers 208 can connect to the network fabric 202 via the leaf switches 212. For example, the servers 208a and 208b can connect directly to the leaf switches 212a and 212b, which can connect the servers 208a and 208b to the network fabric 202 and/or any of the other leaf switches. The servers 208c and 208d can connect to the leaf switches 212b and 212c via the L2 network 204. The servers 208c and 208d and the L2 network 204 make up a local area network (LAN). LANs can connect nodes over dedicated private communications links located in the same general physical location, such as a building or campus.
The WAN 206 can connect to the leaf switches 212d or 212e via the L3 network 206. WANs can connect geographically dispersed nodes over long-distance communications links, such as common carrier telephone lines, optical light paths, synchronous optical networks (SONET), or synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) links. LANs and WANs can include L2 and/or L3 networks and endpoints.
The Internet is an example of a WAN that connects disparate networks throughout the world, providing global communication between nodes on various networks. The nodes typically communicate over the network by exchanging discrete frames or packets of data according to predefined protocols, such as the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP). In this context, a protocol can refer to a set of rules defining how the nodes interact with each other. Computer networks can be further interconnected by an intermediate network node, such as a router, to extend the effective size of each network. The endpoints, e.g. the servers 208, can include any communication device or component, such as a computer, server, blade, hypervisor, virtual machine, container, process (e.g., running on a virtual machine), switch, router, gateway, host, device, external network, etc.
In some embodiments, the network environment 200 also includes a network controller running on the host 208a. The network controller is implemented using the Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC™) from Cisco®. The APIC™ provides a centralized point of automation and management, policy programming, application deployment, and health monitoring for the fabric 202. In some embodiments, the APIC™ is operated as a replicated synchronized clustered controller. In other embodiments, other configurations or software-defined networking (SDN) platforms can be utilized for managing the fabric 202.
In some embodiments, a physical server 208 can have instantiated thereon a hypervisor 216 for creating and running one or more virtual switches (not shown) and one or more virtual machines 218, as shown for the host 208b. In other embodiments, physical servers can run a shared kernel for hosting containers. In yet other embodiments, the physical server 208 can run other software for supporting other virtual partitioning approaches. Networks in accordance with various embodiments can include any number of physical servers hosting any number of virtual machines, containers, or other virtual partitions. Hosts can also comprise blade/physical servers without virtual machines, containers, or other virtual partitions, such as the servers 208a, 208c, 208d, and 208e.
The network environment 200 can also integrate a network traffic monitoring system, such as the network traffic monitoring system 100 shown in
As shown in
Currently, sensors, e.g. such as those of the network traffic monitoring system 100, deployed in a network can be used to gather network traffic data related to nodes operating in the network. The network traffic data can include metadata relating to a packet, a collection of packets, a flow, a bidirectional flow, a group of flows, a session, or a network communication of another granularity. That is, the network traffic data can generally include any information describing communication on all layers of the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model. For example, the network traffic data can include source/destination MAC address, source/destination IP address, protocol, port number, etc. In some embodiments, the network traffic data can also include summaries of network activity or other network statistics such as number of packets, number of bytes, number of flows, bandwidth usage, response time, latency, packet loss, jitter, and other network statistics.
Gathered network traffic data can be analyzed to provide insights into the operation of the nodes in the network, otherwise referred to as analytics. In particular, discovered application or inventories, application dependencies, policies, efficiencies, resource and bandwidth usage, and network flows can be determined for the network using the network traffic data.
Sensors deployed in a network can be used to gather network traffic data on a client and server level of granularity. For example, network traffic data can be gathered for determining which clients are communicating which servers and vice versa. However, sensors are not currently deployed or integrated with systems to gather network traffic data for different segments of traffic flows forming the traffic flows between a server and a client. Specifically, current sensors gather network traffic data as traffic flows directly between a client and a server while ignoring which nodes, e.g. middleboxes, the traffic flows actually pass through in passing between a server and a client. More specifically, current sensors are not configured to gather network traffic data as traffic flows pass through multiple middleboxes between a server and a client. This effectively treats the network environment between servers and clients as a black box and leads to gaps in network traffic data and traffic flows indicated by the network traffic data.
In turn, such gaps in network traffic data and corresponding traffic flows can lead to deficiencies in diagnosing problems within a network environment. For example, a problem stemming from an incorrectly configured middlebox might be diagnosed as occurring at a client as the flow between the client and a server is treated as a black box even though it actually passes through one or more middleboxes. In another example, gaps in network traffic data between a server and a client can lead to an inability to determine whether policies are correctly enforced at middleboxes between the server and the client. There therefore exist needs for systems, methods, and computer-readable media for generating network traffic data at nodes between servers and clients, e.g. at multiple middleboxes in a chain of middleboxes between the servers and clients. In particular, there exist needs for systems, methods, and computer-readable media for stitching together traffic flows that pass through multiple nodes between servers and clients to generate more complete and detailed traffic flows, e.g. between the servers and the clients.
The present includes systems, methods, and computer-readable media for stitching traffic flow segments across nodes, e.g. middleboxes, in a network environment to form a stitched traffic flow through the nodes in the network environment. In particular, flow records can be collected of traffic flow segments at both a first middlebox and a second middlebox in a network environment corresponding to one or more traffic flows passing through either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox. The flow records can include one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flows. Sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to either or both the first middlebox and the second middlebox can be identified using the flow records. A subset of the traffic flow segments to can be stitched together to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the first middlebox. Additionally, another subset of the traffic flow segments can be stitched together to form a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox in the network environment based on the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments and the sources and destination of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the second middlebox. The different subsets of the traffic flow segments used to generate the first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow can include common traffic flow segments. The first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow can be stitched together to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow across the first middlebox and the second middlebox. Subsequently, the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow can be incorporated as part of network traffic data for the network environment.
The client 302 and the server 304 can exchange data as part of one or more traffic flows. A traffic flow can be unidirectional or bidirectional. For example, a traffic flow can include the client 302 sending a request that is ultimately received at the server 304. Vice versa, a traffic flow can include the server 304 sending a response that is ultimately received at the client 302. In another example, a traffic flow can include both the client 302 sending a request that is ultimately received at the server 304 and the server 304 sending a response to the request that is ultimately received at the client 302. Traffic flows between the client 302 and the server 304 can form part of a traffic flow including the client 302 and other sources/destinations at different network nodes, e.g. separate from the server 304 and the client 302, within a network environment. For example, traffic flows between the client 302 and the server 304 can form part of an overall traffic flow between the client 302 and a network node within a network environment that is ultimately accessed through the server 304 and a network fabric.
Further, the client 302 and the server 304 can exchange data as part of one or more transactions. A transaction can include a request originating at the client 302 and ultimately sent to the server 304. Further, a transaction can include a response to the request originating at the server 304 and ultimately send to the client 302. Vice versa, a transaction can include a request that originates at the server 304 and is ultimately sent to the client 302 and a response to the request that originates at the client 302 and is ultimately send to the server 304. A transaction can be associated with a completed flow. Specifically, a completed flow of a transaction can include a request that originates at the client 302 and is sent to the server 304 and a response to the request that originates at the server 304 and is sent to the client 302.
In the example network environment 300 shown in
In supporting exchange of data between the client 302 and the server 304, different portions of traffic flows, otherwise referred to as traffic flow segments, can be created at the middleboxes 306 between the client 302 and the server 304. Specifically, the first middlebox 306-1 can receive data from the client 302 in a first traffic flow segment 308-1. Subsequently, the first middlebox 306-1 can provide data received from the client 302, e.g. through the first traffic flow segment 308-1, to the second middlebox 306-2 as part of a second traffic flow segment 308-2. The second middlebox 306-2 can then provide the data received from the client 302 through the first middlebox 306-1, e.g. through the second traffic flow segment 308-2, to the server 304 as part of a third traffic flow segment 308-3. Similarly, the second middlebox 306-2 can receive data from the server 304 in a fourth traffic flow segment 308-4. The second middlebox 306-2 can provide data received from the server 304, e.g. in the fourth traffic flow segment 308-4, to the first middlebox 306-1 in a fifth traffic flow segment 308-5. Subsequently, the first middlebox 306-1 can provide data from the server 304 and received from the second middlebox in the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5 to the client 302 as part of a sixth traffic flow segment 308-6.
All or an applicable combination of the first traffic flow segment 308-1, the second traffic flow segment 308-2, the third traffic flow segment 308-3, the fourth traffic flow segment 308-4, the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5, and the sixth traffic flow segment 308-6 (collectively referred to as the “traffic flow segments 308”) can form part of a single traffic flow. For example, the first traffic flow segment 308-1, the second traffic flow segment 308-2, and the third traffic flow segment 308-3 can be used to transmit a request from the client 302 to the server 304 and combine to form a single traffic flow between the client 302 and the server 304. In another example, the first, second, and third traffic flow segments 308-1, 308-2, 308-3 can form a request transmitted to the server 304 and the fourth, fifth, and sixth traffic flow segments 308-4, 308-5, and 308-6 can form a response to the request. Further in the example, the traffic flow segments 308 including both the request and the response to the request can form a single traffic flow between the client 302 and the server 304.
The traffic flow segments 308 can be associated with or otherwise assigned one or more transaction identifiers. More specifically, a transaction identifier can be uniquely associated with a single traffic flow passing through both the first middlebox 306-1 and the second middlebox 306-2. Subsequently, all or a combination of the traffic flow segments 308 can be associated with a transaction identifier uniquely associated with a traffic flow formed by all or the combination of the traffic flow segments 308. For example, the traffic flow segments 308 can form a single traffic flow between the client 302 and the server 304 and each be assigned a single transaction identifier for the traffic flow. In another example, the first traffic flow segment 308-1, the second traffic flow segment 308-2, and the third traffic flow segment 308-3 can form a first traffic flow and the fourth traffic flow segment 308-4, the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5, and the sixth traffic flow segment 308-6 can form a second traffic flow. Subsequently, a transaction identifier uniquely associated with the first traffic flow can be assigned to the first traffic flow segment 308-1, the second traffic flow segment 308-2, and the third traffic flow segment 308-3, while a transaction identifier uniquely associated with the second traffic flow can be assigned to the fourth traffic flow segment 308-4, the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5, and the sixth traffic flow segment 308-6.
While the client 302 and the server 304 are shown as communicating through the middleboxes 306, in the example environment shown in
The example network environment 300 shown in
Each of the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 can collect flow records for a corresponding middlebox. For example, the first middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310-1 can collect flow records for the first middlebox 306-1. Further in the example, the second middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310-2 can collect flow records for the second middlebox 306-2.
Flow records of a middlebox can include applicable data related to traffic segments flowing through the middlebox. Specifically, flow records of a middlebox can include one or a combination of a source of data transmitted in a traffic flow segment, a destination for data transmitted in a traffic flow segment, a transaction identifier assigned to a traffic flow segment. More specifically, flow records of a middlebox can include one or a combination of an address, e.g. IP address of a source or a destination, and an identification of a port at a source or a destination, e.g. an ephemeral port, a virtual IP (herein referred to as “VIP”) port, a subnet IP (herein referred to as “SNIP”) port, or a server port. For example, flow records collected by the first middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310-1 for the first traffic flow segment 308-1 and the second traffic flow segment 308-2 can include a unique identifier associated with a traffic flow formed by the segments 308-1 and 308-2 and assigned to the first and second traffic flow segments 308-1 and 308-2. Further in the example, the flow records can include an IP address of the client 302 where the first traffic flow segment 308-1 originates and a VIP port at the first middlebox 306-1 where the first traffic flow segment 308-1 is received. Still further in the example, the flow records can include an SNIP port at the first middlebox 306-1 where the second traffic flow segment 308-2 originates and a VIP port at the second middlebox 306-2 where the second traffic flow segment 308-2 is received, e.g. for purposes of load balancing.
Data included in flow records of corresponding traffic flow segments passing through a middlebox can depend on whether the traffic flow segments originate at a corresponding middlebox of the middleboxes 306 or ends at a corresponding middlebox of the middlebox 306. For example, a flow record for the first traffic flow segment 308-1 that is collected by the first middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310-1 can include a unique transaction identifier and indicate that the first traffic flow segment starts at the client 302 and ends at the first middlebox 306-1. Similarly, a flow record for the second traffic flow segment 308-2 can include the unique transaction identifier, which is also assigned to the first traffic flow segment 308-1, as well as an indication that the second traffic flow segment starts at the first middlebox 306-1 and ends at the second middlebox 306-2. Accordingly, flow records for traffic flow segments passing through the middleboxes 306 are each rooted at the middleboxes 306, e.g. by including an indication of one of the middleboxes 306 as a source or a destination of the traffic flow segments. Specifically, as traffic flow segments are rooted at the middleboxes 306, flow records for the traffic flow segments passing through the middleboxes 306 each either begin or end at the middleboxes 306.
The middleboxes 306 can generate flow records for traffic flow segments passing through the middleboxes 306. More specifically, the middleboxes 306 can associate or otherwise assign a unique transaction identifier to traffic flow segments as part of creating flow records for the traffic flow segments. For example, the first middlebox 306-1 can assign a TID1 of a consumer request to the first traffic flow segment 308-1 as part of creating a flow record, e.g. for the first traffic flow segment 308-1. Further in the example, the first middlebox 306-1 can determine to send the consumer request to the second middlebox 306-2 and/or the server 304, e.g. as part of load balancing. Still further in the example, the first middlebox 306-1 can assign the TID1 of the consumer request to the second traffic flow segment 308-1 as the consumer request is transmitted to the second middlebox 306-2 through the second traffic flow segment 308-2, e.g. as part of the load balancing. Subsequently, the middleboxes 306 can export the generated flow segments for traffic flow segments passing through the middleboxes 306.
Additionally, the middleboxes 306 can modify a flow record for a traffic flow segment by associating the traffic flow segment with a transaction identifier as part of exporting the flow record. For example, the middleboxes 306 can determine to export a flow record for a traffic flow segment. Subsequently, before exporting the flow record, the middleboxes 306 can associate the traffic flow segment with a transaction identifier and subsequently modify the flow record to include the transaction identifier. The middleboxes 306 can then export the modified flow record including the transaction identifier.
The middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 can collect flow records from the middleboxes 306 as the flow records are completed or otherwise generated by the middleboxes 306. Specifically, the middleboxes 306 can generate and/or export flow records for traffic flow segments as all or portions of corresponding traffic flows actually pass through the middleboxes 306. More specifically, the first middlebox 306-1 can create and export traffic flow records as either or both the first traffic flow segment 308-1 and the second traffic flow segment 308-2 are completed at the first middlebox 306-1. Additionally, the middleboxes 306 can generate and/or export flow records for traffic flow segments once a corresponding traffic flow formed by the segments is completed through the middleboxes 306. For example, the first middlebox 306-1 can create and export traffic flow records for the traffic flow segments 308-1, 308-2, 308-5, and 308-6 once all of the traffic flow segments are transmitted to complete a traffic flow through the first middlebox 306-1. Further in the example, the first middlebox 306-1 can recognize that a consumer to producer flow is complete, e.g. the first, second, and third traffic flow segments 308-1, 308-2, 308-3 are complete or all of the traffic flow segments 308 are completed, and subsequently the first middlebox 306-1 can export one or more corresponding flow records to the first middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310-1.
The middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 can receive or otherwise collect traffic flow records from the middleboxes 306 according to an applicable protocol for exporting flow records, e.g. from a middlebox. More specifically, the middleboxes 306 can export flow records to the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 according to an applicable protocol for exporting flow records, e.g. from a middlebox. For example, the middleboxes 306 can export flow records to the middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310 using an Internet Protocol Flow Information Export (herein referred to as “IPFIX”) protocol. In another example, the middleboxes 306 can export flow records to the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 using a NetFlow Packet transport protocol.
While flow records can indicate traffic flow segments are rooted at the middleboxes 306, the flow records for traffic segments passing through the middlebox 306 can fail to link the traffic flow segments, e.g. through the middleboxes 306. Specifically, flow records for the first traffic flow segment 308-1 can indicate that the first traffic flow segment 308-1 ends at the first middlebox 306-1 while flow records for the second traffic flow segment 308-2 can indicate that the second traffic flow segment 308-2 begins at the first middlebox 306-1, while failing to link the first and second traffic flow segments 308-1 and 308-2. Further, flow records for the first traffic flow segment 308-1 can indicate that the third traffic flow segment 308-3 begins at the second middlebox 306-2, while failing to link the first and second traffic flow segments 308-1 and 308-2 with the third traffic flow segment 308-3.
Failing to link traffic flow segments through the middleboxes 306 is problematic in synchronizing or otherwise identifying how the server 304 and the client 302 communicate through the middleboxes 306. Specifically, failing to link traffic flow segments through the middleboxes 306 leads to a view from a server-side perspective that all flows end in the second middlebox 306-2. Similarly, failing to link traffic flow segments through the middleboxes 306 leads to a view from a client-side perspective that all flows end in the first middlebox 306-1. This can correspond to gaps in mapping traffic flows between the client 302 and the server 304, e.g. the middleboxes 306 are treated like a black box without linking the client 302 with the server 304. In turn, this can lead to deficiencies in diagnosing problems within the network environment 300. For example, a failed policy check at the first middlebox 306-1 can mistakenly be identified as happening at the client 302 even though it actually occurs at the first middlebox 306-1. Specifically, the failed policy check can be triggered by a failure of the first middlebox 306-1 to route data according to the policy between the client 302 and the server 304, however since the traffic flow segments rotted at the first middlebox 306-1 are not linked with the traffic flow segments rotted at the second middlebox 306-2, the failed policy check can be identified from a traffic flow segment as occurring at the client 302 instead of the first middlebox 306-1.
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 functions to stitch together traffic flow segments passing through the middleboxes 306 to create stitched traffic flows at the middleboxes 306. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the first traffic flow segment 308-1, the second traffic flow segment 308-2, the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5, and the sixth traffic flow segment 308-6 to form a stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1. Similarly, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the second traffic flow segment 308-2, the third traffic flow segment 308-3, the fourth traffic flow segment 308-4, and the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5 to form a stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2. Stitched traffic flows can be represented or otherwise used to create corresponding flow data. Flow data for a stitched traffic flow can include identifiers of stitched traffic flow segments, e.g. identifiers of sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments, and transactions associated with the stitched traffic flow segments, e.g. associated transaction identifiers.
Further, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow. A cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow can include traffic flow segments stitched together across a plurality of corresponding middleboxes that the traffic flow segments pass through or are otherwise rooted at to create a stitched traffic flow across the middleboxes. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the first, second, fifth, and sixth traffic flow segments 308-1, 308-2, 308-5, and 308-6 to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1. Further in the example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the second, third, fourth, and fifth traffic flow segments 308-2, 308-3, 308-4, and 308-5 to form a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2. Still further in the example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow between the client 302 and the server 304 that spans across the first middlebox 306-1 and the second middlebox 306-2.
In stitching together traffic flow segments at the middleboxes 306 to create stitched traffic flows and corresponding cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows, the middleboxes 306 can no longer function as black boxes with respect to traffic flows passing through the middleboxes 306. Specifically, from both a server side perspective and a client side perspective, a traffic flow can be viewed as actually passing through the middleboxes 306 to the client 302 or the server 304 and not just as traffic flow segments that only originate at or end at the middleboxes 306. This is advantageous as it allows for more complete and insightful network monitoring, leading to more accurate problem diagnosing and solving. For example, as traffic flows are seen as actually passing through the middleboxes 306, misconfigurations of the middleboxes 306 can be identified from the traffic flows, e.g. as part of monitoring network environments.
Traffic flows at the middleboxes 306 stitched together by the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can be used to enforce policies at middleboxes, including the middleboxes 306. Specifically, stitched traffic flows and corresponding cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows generated by the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can be used to identify dependencies between either or both servers and clients. For example, cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows generated by the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can be used to generate application dependency mappings between different applications at servers and clients. Subsequently, policies can be set and subsequently enforced at the middleboxes 306 based on dependencies identified using the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows generated by the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312. For example, a policy to load balance communications between clients and servers can be identified according to an application dependency mapping between the clients and the servers identified through cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows at the middleboxes 306. Further in the example, the policy can subsequently be enforced at the middleboxes 306 to provide load balancing between the clients and the servers.
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together traffic flow segments passing through the middleboxes 306 based on flow records collected from the middleboxes 306. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together traffic flow segments based on flow records collected by the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 from the middleboxes 306. In using flow records to stitch together traffic flow segments, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together traffic flow segments based on transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments, as indicated by the flow records. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together traffic flow segments that are assigned the same transaction identifiers. For example, the traffic flow segments 308 can all have the same assigned transaction identifier, and the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments 308 to form corresponding first and second stitched traffic flows based on the shared transaction identifier. Further in the example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments 308 to form a corresponding first stitched traffic flow about the first middlebox 306-1 and a corresponding second stitched traffic flow about the second middlebox 306-2.
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow based on flow records collected from the middleboxes 306. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows based on one or more transaction identifiers included as part of the flow records to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow. More specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows based on one or more transaction identifiers associated with the traffic flow segments and used to generate the stitched traffic flows from the traffic flow segments. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments 308 based on a transaction identifier associated with the traffic flow segments 308 to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1 and a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2. Subsequently, the
Further, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify flow directions of traffic flow segments passing through the middlebox 306 using flow records collected from the middlebox 306 by the middlebox traffic flow segment collector 310. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify flow directions of traffic flow segments with respect to the middlebox 306 using flow records collected from the middlebox 306. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can use flow records from the middlebox 306 to identify the fourth traffic flow segment 308-4 flows from the middlebox 306 to the client 302. The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can use identified sources and destinations of traffic flow segments, as indicated by flow records, to identify flow directions of the traffic flow segments. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can determine the first traffic flow segment 308-1 flows from the client 302 to the middlebox 306 based on an identification of a client IP address as the source of the first traffic flow segment 308-1 and an identification of a VIP port at the middlebox 306.
In stitching together traffic flow segments based on flow records, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments based on directions of the traffic flow segments identified from the flow records. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the first traffic flow segment 308-1 with the second traffic flow segment 308-2 based on the identified direction of the first and second traffic flow segments 308-1 and 308-2 from the client 302 towards the server 304. Additionally, in stitching together traffic flow segments based on flow records, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments based on directions of the traffic flow segments and also transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch the third and fourth traffic flow segments 308-3 and 308-4 together based on the segments having the same transaction identifier and the shared direction of the segments from the server 304 to the client 302.
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together traffic flow segments in an order based on flow directions of the traffic flow segments. More specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can use a shared transaction identifier to determine traffic flow segments to stitch together, and stitch the traffic flow segments in a specific order based on flow directions of the traffic flow segments to form a stitched traffic flow. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can determine to stitch the traffic flow segments 308 based on a shared transaction identifier assigned to the traffic flow segments 308. Further in the example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can determine to stitch the second traffic flow segment 308-2 after the first traffic flow segment 308-1, stitch the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5 after the second traffic flow segment 308-2, and stitch the sixth traffic flow segment 308-6 after the fifth traffic flow segment 308-5, based on corresponding identified flow directions of the flow segments 308, e.g. with respect to the middlebox 306.
Further, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows to form cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows based on directions of traffic flow segments used to form the stitched traffic flows. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together a stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1 with a stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2 based on the second traffic flow segment 308-2 having a direction from the first middlebox 306-1 to the second middlebox 306-2. Similarly, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together a stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2 with a stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1 based on the fifth traffic flow segment having a direction from the second middlebox 306-2 to the first middlebox 306-1.
Additionally, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows to form cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows based on common traffic flow segments. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together stitched traffic flows to form cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows if the stitched traffic flows share one or more common traffic flow segments. A common traffic flow segment is a traffic flow segment that is used to form two separate stitched traffic flows. For example, the second traffic flow segment 308-2 can be a common traffic flow segment for a stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1 and a stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2. Further, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together flows according to positions of common traffic flow segments in the stitched traffic flows. For example, based on the position of the second traffic flow segment 308-2 in a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox 306-1 and a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox 306-2, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch the second stitched traffic flow after the first stitched traffic flow.
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can incorporate either or both stitched traffic flows through the middleboxes 306 and cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows as part of network traffic data for the network environment. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can include stitched traffic flows through the middleboxes 306 and cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows with other traffic flows in the network environment, e.g. from servers to nodes in a network fabric. In another example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can update network traffic data to indicate a completed flow between a client and a server passes between the server and the client through multiple middleboxes, e.g. as indicated by a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow.
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can incorporate stitched traffic flows and cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows as part of network traffic data generated by an applicable network traffic monitoring system, such as the network traffic monitoring system 100 shown in
In incorporating stitched traffic flows and cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows into network traffic data, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can extend network traffic flows in the network traffic data based on the stitched traffic flows and cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch already stitched traffic flows extending through the middleboxes 306 to the client with other stitched traffic flows extending into the network environment 300. More specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch already stitched traffic flows through the middleboxes 306 with other traffic flows that extend from the server 304 to other servers or nodes in the network environment 300. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together a traffic flow extending from a network fabric to the server 304 with a stitched traffic flow through the middleboxes 306 to the client 302. This can create a completed traffic flow from the network fabric to the client 302 through the middleboxes 306.
Each block shown in
At step 400, the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 collects flow records of traffic flow segments at first and second middleboxes in a network environment corresponding to one or more traffic flows passing through the middleboxes. The flow records can include one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments. The flow records of the traffic flow segments at the middleboxes can be generated by the middleboxes and subsequently exported to the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310. More specifically, the flow records can be exported to the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 through the IPFIX protocol. The flow records can be exported to the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 after each of the traffic flow segments is established, e.g. through the middleboxes. Alternatively, the flow records can be exported to the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 410 after a corresponding traffic flow of the traffic flow segments is completed, e.g. through the middleboxes.
At step 402, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 identifies sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments in the network environment with respect to the middleboxes using the flow records. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify whether a traffic flow segment is passing from a client to one or the middleboxes towards a server using the flow records. In another example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify whether a traffic flow segment is passing from a server to the middleboxes towards a client using the flow records. In yet another example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify whether a traffic flow segment is passing between the middleboxes, e.g. from the first middlebox to the second middlebox or vice versa. The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify flow directions of the traffic flow segments based on either or both sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments included as part of the flow records. For example, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can identify a flow direction of a traffic flow segment based on an IP address of a server where the flow segment started and a SNIP port on one of the first or second middleboxes that ends the flow segment at the middlebox.
At step 404, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 stitches together the traffic flow segments to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox and a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox. More specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox and a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox based on one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments. Further, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the traffic flow segments to form a first stitched traffic flow at the first middlebox and a second stitched traffic flow at the second middlebox based on the sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments with respect to the middleboxes. For example, the traffic flow segments sharing the same transaction identifier can be stitched together based on the directions of the traffic flow segments to form the first and second stitched traffic flows, e.g. based on the flow records. More specifically, the one or more transaction identifiers assigned to the traffic flow segments can be indicated by the flow records collected at step 400 and subsequently used to stitch the traffic flow segments together to form the first and second stitched traffic flows.
At step 406, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 stitches together the first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow to from a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow across the first middlebox and the second middlebox. Specifically, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow to form the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow based on the sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments with respect to the middleboxes. Further, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 can stitch together the first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow to form the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow based on common traffic flow segments between the first stitched traffic flow and the second stitched traffic flow, e.g. as indicated by the sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments.
At step 408, the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 312 incorporates the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow as part of network traffic data for the network environment. Specifically, the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow can be incorporated as part of identified traffic flows in the network environment that are included as part of the network traffic data for the network environment. For example, the cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow can be stitched to traffic flows identified in a network fabric of the network environment, as part of incorporating the stitched traffic flow with network data for the network environment including the network fabric.
All of portions of the middlebox traffic flow stitching system 500 can be implemented at an applicable collector for collecting flow records from a middlebox, such as the middlebox traffic flow segment collectors 310 shown in
The middlebox traffic flow stitching system 500 includes a flow records hash table maintainer 502, a flow records hash table datastore 504, a traffic flow segment stitcher 506, and a completed flow identifier 508. The flow records hash table maintainer 502 functions to maintain a flow records hash table. The flow records hash table maintainer 502 can maintain a hash table based on flow records collected from or otherwise exported by a middlebox. In maintaining a flow records hash table, the flow records hash table maintainer 502 can generate and update one or more flow records hash table stored in the flow records hash table datastore 504.
Table 1, shown above, illustrates an example of a flow records hash table maintained by the flow records hash table maintainer 502 and stored in the flow records hash table datastore 504. The example flow records hash table includes a plurality of entries. Each entry corresponds to a traffic flow segment passing through a middlebox. Further, each entry includes a transaction identifier and a source and destination identifier for each traffic flow segment. For example, the first entry corresponds to a traffic flow segment passing from the client, C, to a port on the middlebox, VIP. Further in the example, the first entry includes a transaction identifier, T1, assigned to the traffic flow segment, e.g. by a middlebox. In another example, the second entry corresponds to a second traffic flow segment passing from the middlebox, IP, to a server, signified by “Server” in the entry. Flow records hash tables can include entries with different transaction identifiers corresponding to different traffic flows. Specifically, the example flow records hash table has a first entry including a first transaction identifier T1 and a fifth entry including a second transaction identifier T2.
The traffic flow segment stitcher 506 functions to stitch together traffic flow segments at a middlebox to form a stitched traffic flow corresponding to a traffic flow through the middlebox. Specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together traffic flow segments using a flow records hash table, e.g. stored in the flow records hash table datastore 504. In using a flow records hash table to stitch together traffic flow segments, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together traffic flows based on transaction identifiers included as part of entries corresponding to traffic flow segments in the flow records hash table. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together a first traffic flow segment corresponding to the first entry in the example hash table and a second traffic flow segment corresponding to the second entry in the example hash table based on both entries including the same transaction identifier T1.
Further, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can function to stitch together stitched traffic flows to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow. Specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together stitched traffic flows using one or more flow records hash tables, e.g. stored in the flow records hash table datastore 504. More specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can use flow records hash tables to identify common traffic flow segments between stitched traffic flows. Subsequently, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together the stitched traffic flow based on the common traffic flow segments to form a cross-middlebox stitched traffic flow.
In using a flow records hash table to stitch together traffic flow segments, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can group entries in the hash table to form grouped entries and subsequently use the grouped entries to stitch together traffic flow segments and already stitched traffic flow segments. More specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can group entries that share a transaction identifier to form grouped entries. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can group the first four entries together based on the entries all having the same transaction identifier T1. Subsequently, based on entries being grouped together to form grouped entries, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together traffic flows corresponding to the entries in the grouped entries. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can group the first four entries in the example flow records hash table and subsequently stitch traffic flow segments corresponding to the first four entries based on the grouping of the first four entries.
Further, in using a flow records hash table to stitch together traffic flow segments and already stitched traffic flow segments, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can identify flow directions and/or sources and destinations of the traffic flow segments based on corresponding entries of the traffic flow segments in the flow records hash table. More specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can identify flow directions of traffic flow segments based on identifiers of sources and destinations of the segments in corresponding entries in a flow records hash table. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can identify that a traffic flow segment corresponding to the first entry in the example hash table moves from a client to a middlebox based on the flow segment originating at the client and terminating at a VIP port at the middlebox, as indicated by the first entry in the table. Subsequently, using flow directions and/or sources and destinations of traffic flow segments identified from a flow records hash table, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can actually stitch together the traffic flow segments to form either or both stitched traffic flow and cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch a traffic flow segment corresponding to the fourth entry in the example hash table after a traffic flow segment corresponding to the third entry in the example hash table.
The traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can stitch together traffic flow segments to form stitched traffic flow segments based on both directions of the traffic flow segments, as identified from corresponding entries in a flow records hash table, and transaction identifiers included in the flow records hash table. Specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can identify to stitch together traffic flow segments with corresponding entries in a flow records hash table that share a common transaction identifier. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can determine to stitch together traffic flow segments corresponding to the first four entries in the example flow records hash table based on the first four entries sharing the same transaction identifier T1. Additionally, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can determine an order to stitch together traffic flow segments based on flow directions of the traffic flow segments identified from corresponding entries of the segments in a flow records hash table. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can determine to stitch together a third traffic flow segment corresponding to the third entry in the example hash table after a second traffic flow segment corresponding to the second entry in the example hash table based on flow directions of the segments identified from the entries.
The completed flow identifier 508 functions to identify a completed traffic flow occurring through the middlebox. A completed traffic flow can correspond to establishment of a connection between a client and a server and vice versa. For example, a completed traffic flow can include a request transmitted from a client to a middlebox, and the request transmitted from the middlebox to another middlebox before it is finally transmitted to a server. Further in the example, the completed traffic flow can include completion of the request from the client to the server through the middleboxes and completion of a response to the request from the server to the client through the middleboxes. The completed flow identifier 508 can identify a completed flow based on flow records. More specifically, the completed flow identifier 508 can identify a completed flow based on one or more flow records hash tables. For example, the completed flow identifier 508 can identify the first four entries form a completed flow based on both the first entry beginning at the client and the last entry ending at the client, and all entries having the same transaction identifier T1.
The traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can push or otherwise export traffic flow data for stitched traffic flows and corresponding cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows. More specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can export traffic flow data for incorporation with network traffic data for a network environment. For example, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can export traffic flow data to the network traffic monitoring system 100, where the traffic flow data can be combined with network traffic data for a network environment. The traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can push traffic flow data based on identification of a completed traffic flow by the completed flow identifier 508. More specifically, the traffic flow segment stitcher 506 can export traffic flow data indicating a stitched traffic flow of a completed traffic flow upon identification that the traffic flow is actually a completed flow. This can ensure that data for stitched traffic flows and corresponding cross-middlebox stitched traffic flows is only pushed or otherwise provided when it is known that the stitched traffic flows correspond to completed traffic flows.
The disclosure now turns to
The interfaces 602 are typically provided as modular interface cards (sometimes referred to as “line cards”). Generally, they control the sending and receiving of data packets over the network and sometimes support other peripherals used with the network device 600. Among the interfaces that may be provided are Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like. In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast token ring interfaces, wireless interfaces, Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces, WIFI interfaces, 3G/4G/5G cellular interfaces, CAN BUS, LoRA, and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control, signal processing, crypto processing, and management. By providing separate processors for the communications intensive tasks, these interfaces allow the master microprocessor 604 to efficiently perform routing computations, network diagnostics, security functions, etc.
Although the system shown in
Regardless of the network device's configuration, it may employ one or more memories or memory modules (including memory 606) configured to store program instructions for the general-purpose network operations and mechanisms for roaming, route optimization and routing functions described herein. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to store tables such as mobility binding, registration, and association tables, etc. Memory 606 could also hold various software containers and virtualized execution environments and data.
The network device 600 can also include an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), which can be configured to perform routing and/or switching operations. The ASIC can communicate with other components in the network device 600 via the bus 610, to exchange data and signals and coordinate various types of operations by the network device 600, such as routing, switching, and/or data storage operations, for example.
To enable user interaction with the system 700, an input device 745 can represent any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device 735 can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems can enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the system 700. The communications interface 740 can generally govern and manage the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed.
Storage device 730 is a non-volatile memory and can be a hard disk or other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, solid state memory devices, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMs) 725, read only memory (ROM) 720, and hybrids thereof.
The storage device 730 can include services 732, 734, 736 for controlling the processor 710. Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device 730 can be connected to the system connection 705. In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function can include the software component stored in a computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor 710, connection 705, output device 735, and so forth, to carry out the function.
For clarity of explanation, in some instances the present technology may be presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks comprising devices, device components, steps or routines in a method embodied in software, or combinations of hardware and software.
In some embodiments the computer-readable storage devices, medius, and memories can include a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like. However, when mentioned, non-transitory computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se.
Methods according to the above-described examples can be implemented using computer-executable instructions that are stored or otherwise available from computer readable media. Such instructions can comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause or otherwise configure a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Portions of computer resources used can be accessible over a network. The computer executable instructions may be, for example, binaries, intermediate format instructions such as assembly language, firmware, or source code. Examples of computer-readable media that may be used to store instructions, information used, and/or information created during methods according to described examples include magnetic or optical disks, flash memory, USB devices provided with non-volatile memory, networked storage devices, and so on.
Devices implementing methods according to these disclosures can comprise hardware, firmware and/or software, and can take any of a variety of form factors. Typical examples of such form factors include laptops, smart phones, small form factor personal computers, personal digital assistants, rackmount devices, standalone devices, and so on. Functionality described herein also can be embodied in peripherals or add-in cards. Such functionality can also be implemented on a circuit board among different chips or different processes executing in a single device, by way of further example.
The instructions, media for conveying such instructions, computing resources for executing them, and other structures for supporting such computing resources are means for providing the functions described in these disclosures.
Although a variety of examples and other information was used to explain aspects within the scope of the appended claims, no limitation of the claims should be implied based on particular features or arrangements in such examples, as one of ordinary skill would be able to use these examples to derive a wide variety of implementations. Further and although some subject matter may have been described in language specific to examples of structural features and/or method steps, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to these described features or acts. For example, such functionality can be distributed differently or performed in components other than those identified herein. Rather, the described features and steps are disclosed as examples of components of systems and methods within the scope of the appended claims.
Claim language reciting “at least one of” refers to at least one of a set and indicates that one member of the set or multiple members of the set satisfy the claim. For example, claim language reciting “at least one of A and B” means A, B, or A and B.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/622,008, filed on Jan. 25, 2018, entitled “Discovery of Middle Boxes Using Traffic Flow Stitching,” the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5086385 | Launey et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5319754 | Meinecke et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5400246 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5436909 | Dev et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5555416 | Owens et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5726644 | Jednacz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742829 | Davis et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5822731 | Schultz | Oct 1998 | A |
5831848 | Rielly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5903545 | Sabourin et al. | May 1999 | A |
6012096 | Link et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6141595 | Gloudeman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144962 | Weinberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6239699 | Ronnen | May 2001 | B1 |
6247058 | Miller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249241 | Jordan et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6330562 | Boden et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6353775 | Nichols | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6525658 | Streetman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6546420 | Lemler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6597663 | Rekhter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611896 | Mason, Jr. et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6654750 | Adams et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6728779 | Griffin et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6801878 | Hintz et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816461 | Scrandis et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6847993 | Novaes et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6848106 | Hipp | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6925490 | Novaes et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6958998 | Shorey | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6983323 | Cantrell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996817 | Birum et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6999452 | Drummond-Murray et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7002464 | Bruemmer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024468 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7096368 | Kouznetsov et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111055 | Falkner | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120934 | Ishikawa | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133923 | MeLampy et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162643 | Sankaran et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181769 | Keanini et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185103 | Jain | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7203740 | Putzolu et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7302487 | Ylonen et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7337206 | Wen et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7349761 | Cruse | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7353511 | Ziese | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7356679 | Le et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7360072 | Soltis et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7366174 | MacFaden et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370092 | Aderton et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7395195 | Suenbuel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7444404 | Wetherall et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7466681 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7467205 | Dempster et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7496040 | Seo | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496575 | Buccella et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7530105 | Gilbert et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539770 | Meier | May 2009 | B2 |
7568107 | Rathi et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7610330 | Quinn et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7633942 | Bearden et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7644438 | Dash et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7676570 | Levy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7681131 | Quarterman et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693947 | Judge et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7743242 | Oberhaus et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752307 | Takara | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7774498 | Kraemer et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7783457 | Cunningham | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787480 | Mehta et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7788477 | Huang et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7808897 | Mehta et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7813822 | Hoffberg | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7844696 | Labovitz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7844744 | Abercrombie et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7864707 | Dimitropoulos et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873025 | Patel et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7873074 | Boland | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7874001 | Beck et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7885197 | Metzler | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7895649 | Brook et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7904420 | Ianni | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7930752 | Hertzog et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934248 | Yehuda et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7957934 | Greifeneder | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961637 | McBeath | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970946 | Djabarov et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7975035 | Popescu et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8001610 | Chickering et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8005935 | Pradhan et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8040232 | Oh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8040822 | Proulx et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056134 | Ogilvie | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8115617 | Thubert et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8135657 | Kapoor et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8156430 | Newman | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8160063 | Maltz et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8179809 | Eppstein et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8181248 | Oh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8185824 | Mitchell et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8239365 | Salman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8239915 | Satish et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8250657 | Nachenberg et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8255972 | Azagury et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266697 | Coffman | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272875 | Jurmain | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8281397 | Vaidyanathan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291495 | Burns et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296847 | Mendonca et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311973 | Zadeh | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8365286 | Poston | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370407 | Devarajan et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8381289 | Pereira et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8391270 | Van Der Stok et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407164 | Malik et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407798 | Lotem et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8413235 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8442073 | Skubacz et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451731 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8462212 | Kundu et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8489765 | Vasseur et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499348 | Rubin | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8516590 | Ranadive et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8527977 | Cheng et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8549635 | Muttik et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8570861 | Brandwine et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572600 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572734 | McConnell et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572735 | Ghosh et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572739 | Cruz et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8588081 | Salam et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8600726 | Varshney et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8613084 | Dalcher | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615803 | Dacier et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630316 | Haba | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631464 | Belakhdar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8640086 | Bonev et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8656493 | Capalik | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8661544 | Yen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8677487 | Balupari et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683389 | Bar-Yam et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8706914 | Duchesneau | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8713676 | Pandrangi et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8719452 | Ding et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8719835 | Kanso et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8750287 | Bui et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752042 | Ratica | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752179 | Zaitsev | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8755396 | Sindhu et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8762951 | Kosche et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8769084 | Westerfeld et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8775577 | Alford et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8776180 | Kumar et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8812448 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8812725 | Kulkarni | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8813236 | Saha et al. | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8825848 | Dotan et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832013 | Adams et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
8832461 | Saroiu et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849926 | Marzencki et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8881258 | Paul et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8887238 | Howard et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8904520 | Nachenberg et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8908685 | Patel et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8914497 | Xiao et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8931043 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954610 | Berke et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8955124 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8966021 | Allen | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8966625 | Zuk et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8973147 | Pearcy et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8984331 | Quinn | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8990386 | He et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8996695 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997227 | Mhatre et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9014047 | Alcala et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9015716 | Fletcher et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9071575 | Lemaster et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9088598 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9110905 | Polley et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9117075 | Yeh | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9130836 | Kapadia et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152789 | Natarajan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9160764 | Stiansen et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9170917 | Kumar et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9178906 | Chen et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9185127 | Neou et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191400 | Ptasinski et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9191402 | Yan | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9197654 | Ben-Shalom et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9225793 | Dutta et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237111 | Banavalikar et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9246702 | Sharma et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9246773 | Degioanni | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9253042 | Lumezanu et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253206 | Fleischman | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9258217 | Duffield et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9281940 | Matsuda et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9286047 | Avramov et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9294486 | Chiang et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9317574 | Brisebois et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9319384 | Yan et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9369435 | Short et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9369479 | Lin | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9378068 | Anantharam et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396327 | Auger et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9405903 | Xie et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9417985 | Baars et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9418222 | Rivera et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9426068 | Dunbar et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9454324 | Madhavapeddi | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9462013 | Boss et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9465696 | McNeil et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9501744 | Brisebois et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9531589 | Clemm et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9563517 | Natanzon et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9591018 | Zakian et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9621413 | Lee | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9634915 | Bley | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9645892 | Patwardhan | May 2017 | B1 |
9684453 | Holt et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9697033 | Koponen et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9733973 | Prasad et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9749145 | Banavalikar et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9800608 | Korsunsky et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9904584 | Konig et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9916538 | Zadeh et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9935851 | Gandham et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10009240 | Rao et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
20010028646 | Arts et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020053033 | Cooper et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097687 | Meiri et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103793 | Koller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107857 | Teraslinna | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020141343 | Bays | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184393 | Leddy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023601 | Fortier, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065986 | Fraenkel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097439 | Strayer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126242 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145232 | Poletto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151513 | Herrmann et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154399 | Zuk et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030177208 | Harvey, IV | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040019676 | Iwatsuki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030776 | Cantrell et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040213221 | Civanlar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220984 | Dudfield et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243533 | Dempster et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255050 | Takehiro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268149 | Aaron | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028154 | Smith et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050039104 | Shah et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063377 | Bryant et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083933 | Fine et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108331 | Osterman | May 2005 | A1 |
20050122325 | Twait | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138157 | Jung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166066 | Ahuja et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177829 | Vishwanath | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182681 | Bruskotter et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185621 | Sivakumar et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198247 | Perry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198371 | Smith et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198629 | Vishwanath | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207376 | Ashwood-Smith et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050257244 | Joly et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289244 | Sahu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060048218 | Lingafelt et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060077909 | Saleh et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080733 | Khosmood et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089985 | Poletto | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095968 | Portolani et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060143432 | Rothman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156408 | Himberger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159032 | Ukrainetz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173912 | Lindvall et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195448 | Newport | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060272018 | Fouant | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274659 | Ouderkirk | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280179 | Meier | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294219 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070014275 | Bettink et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025306 | Cox et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070044147 | Choi et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070097976 | Wood et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118654 | Jamkhedkar et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127491 | Verzijp et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162420 | Ou et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070169179 | Narad | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070195729 | Li et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195794 | Fujita et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070195797 | Patel et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201474 | Isobe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070211637 | Mitchell | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214348 | Danielsen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230415 | Malik | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070232265 | Park et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250930 | Aziz et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070300061 | Kim et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002697 | Anantharamaiah et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022385 | Crowell et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028389 | Genty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080046708 | Fitzgerald et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080049633 | Edwards et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056124 | Nanda et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082662 | Dandliker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101234 | Nakil et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080120350 | Grabowski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126534 | Mueller et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141246 | Kuck et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155245 | Lipscombe et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080228913 | Fort-Menares et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080250122 | Zsigmond et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080270199 | Chess et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282347 | Dadhia et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295163 | Kang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301765 | Nicol et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090059934 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064332 | Porras et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090109849 | Wood et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090133126 | Jang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138590 | Lee et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090180393 | Nakamura | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241170 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090292795 | Ford et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296593 | Prescott | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300180 | Dehaan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090307753 | Dupont et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313373 | Hanna et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313698 | Wahl | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319912 | Serr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323543 | Shimakura | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090328219 | Narayanaswamy | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005288 | Rao et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100049839 | Parker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100054241 | Shah et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077445 | Schneider et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100095293 | O'Neill et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095367 | Narayanaswamy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095377 | Krywaniuk | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100138526 | DeHaan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100138810 | Komatsu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148940 | Gelvin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153316 | Duffield et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100153696 | Beachem et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100180016 | Bugwadia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194741 | Finocchio | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220584 | DeHaan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235514 | Beachem | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235879 | Burnside et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235915 | Memon et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287266 | Asati et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100303240 | Beachem | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306180 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100317420 | Hoffberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319060 | Aiken et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004935 | Moffie et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110010585 | Bugenhagen et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110022641 | Werth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110055381 | Narasimhan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055388 | Yumerefendi et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066719 | Miryanov et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069685 | Tofighbakhsh | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072119 | Bronstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083125 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110085556 | Breslin et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110103259 | Aybay et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107074 | Chan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107331 | Evans et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126136 | Abella et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126275 | Anderson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110145885 | Rivers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153039 | Gvelesiani et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153811 | Jeong et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158088 | Lofstrand et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110170860 | Smith et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173490 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110185423 | Sallam | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110196957 | Ayachitula et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110202655 | Sharma et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110214174 | Herzog et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110225207 | Subramanian et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228696 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238793 | Bedare et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246663 | Melsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277034 | Hanson | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110283277 | Castillo et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110302652 | Westerfeld | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314148 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317982 | Xu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120005542 | Petersen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120079592 | Pandrangi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089664 | Igelka | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102361 | Sass et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120102543 | Kohli et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110188 | Van Biljon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117226 | Tanaka et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117642 | Lin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136996 | Seo et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137278 | Draper et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120137361 | Yi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140626 | Anand et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120195198 | Regan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197856 | Banka et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198541 | Reeves | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120216271 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120218989 | Tanabe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120219004 | Balus et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120233348 | Winters | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233473 | Vasseur et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120240232 | Azuma | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246303 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254109 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120260227 | Shukla et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120278021 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120281700 | Koganti et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300628 | Prescott et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130003538 | Greenburg et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003733 | Venkatesan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130003735 | Chao | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006935 | Grisby | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007435 | Bayani | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038358 | Cook et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041934 | Annamalaisami et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054682 | Malik et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130085889 | Fitting et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086272 | Chen et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130103827 | Dunlap et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107709 | Campbell et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117847 | Friedman et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130121209 | Padmanabhan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130124807 | Nielsen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125107 | Bandakka et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130145099 | Liu et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130148663 | Xiong | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159999 | Chiueh et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130173784 | Wang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174256 | Powers | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179487 | Lubetzky et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130179879 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130198517 | Mazzarella | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198839 | Wei et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201986 | Sajassi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130205293 | Levijarvi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219161 | Fontignie et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130219500 | Lukas et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130232498 | Mangtani et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242999 | Kamble et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246925 | Ahuja et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247201 | Alperovitch et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130254879 | Chesla et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268994 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130272305 | Lefebvre | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130275579 | Hernandez et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283374 | Zisapel et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290521 | Labovitz | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130297771 | Osterloh et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301472 | Allan | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130304900 | Trabelsi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130305369 | Karta et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318357 | Abraham et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130326623 | Kruglick | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130333029 | Chesla et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130336164 | Yang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346736 | Cook et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130347103 | Veteikis et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006610 | Formby et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006871 | Lakshmanan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012814 | Bercovici et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019972 | Yahalom et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140031005 | Sumcad et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033193 | Palaniappan | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036688 | Stassinopoulos et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040343 | Nickolov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047185 | Peterson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047372 | Gnezdov et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056318 | Hansson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059200 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074946 | Dirstine et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089494 | Dasari et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140092884 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140096058 | Molesky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140105029 | Jain et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140115219 | Ajanovic et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129942 | Rathod | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137109 | Sharma et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140140244 | Kapadia et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143825 | Behrendt et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140149490 | Luxenberg et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156814 | Barabash et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140156861 | Cruz-Aguilar et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140164607 | Bai et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165200 | Singla | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165207 | Engel et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173623 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192639 | Smirnov | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201717 | Mascaro et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215573 | Cepuran | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140215621 | Xaypanya et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140224784 | Kohler | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140225603 | Auguste et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140233387 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140269777 | Rothstein et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140280499 | Basavaiah et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140281030 | Cui et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140286354 | Van De Poel et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140289854 | Mahvi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140298461 | Hohndel et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140307686 | Su et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317278 | Kersch et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140317737 | Shin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330616 | Lyras | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331048 | Casas-Sanchez et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331276 | Frascadore et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331280 | Porras et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331304 | Wong | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140348182 | Chandra et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351203 | Kunnatur et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351415 | Harrigan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140359695 | Chari et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150006689 | Szilagyi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150006714 | Jain | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150009840 | Pruthi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150026809 | Altman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150033305 | Shear et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150036480 | Huang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150036533 | Sodhi et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150039751 | Harrigan et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046882 | Menyhart et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150052441 | Degioanni | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058976 | Carney et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150067143 | Babakhan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150067786 | Fiske | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082151 | Liang et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150082430 | Sridhara et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150085665 | Kompella et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150095332 | Beisiegel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150112933 | Satapathy | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150113133 | Srinivas et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150124608 | Agarwal et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150124652 | Dhamapurikar et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128133 | Pohlmann | May 2015 | A1 |
20150128205 | Mahaffey et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150138993 | Forster et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150142962 | Srinivas et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150180769 | Wang | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150195291 | Zuk et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150222939 | Gallant et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249622 | Phillips et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256555 | Choi et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261842 | Huang et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150261886 | Wu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271008 | Jain et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150271255 | Mackay et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150295945 | Canzanese, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150312233 | Graham, III et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150347554 | Vasantham et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150356297 | Guri et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358352 | Chasin et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160006753 | McDaid et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160019030 | Shukla et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160020959 | Rahaman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021131 | Heilig | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026552 | Holden et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036636 | Erickson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160036837 | Jain et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160050132 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072815 | Rieke et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160080414 | Kolton et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160087861 | Kuan et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094394 | Sharma et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094529 | Mityagin | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160103692 | Guntaka et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105350 | Greifeneder et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112270 | Danait et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112284 | Pon et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119234 | Valencia Lopez et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160127395 | Underwood et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160147585 | Konig et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160162308 | Chen et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160162312 | Doherty et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173446 | Nantel | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160173535 | Barabash et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183093 | Vaughn et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191476 | Schutz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160205002 | Rieke et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160216994 | Sefidcon et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160217022 | Velipasaoglu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160255082 | Rathod | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269424 | Chandola et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269442 | Shieh | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160269482 | Jamjoom et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160294691 | Joshi | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160308908 | Kirby et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160337204 | Dubey et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160357424 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357546 | Chang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357587 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160357957 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359592 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359628 | Singh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359658 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359673 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359677 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359678 | Madani et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359679 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359680 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359686 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359695 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359696 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359697 | Scheib et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359698 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359699 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359700 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359701 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359703 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359704 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359705 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359708 | Gandham et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359709 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359711 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359712 | Alizadeh Attar et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359740 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359759 | Singh et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359872 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359877 | Kulshreshtha et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359878 | Prasad et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359879 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359880 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359881 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359888 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359889 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359890 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359891 | Pang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359897 | Yadav et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359905 | Touboul et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359912 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359913 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359914 | Deen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359915 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160359917 | Rao et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373481 | Sultan et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380865 | Dubai et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170006141 | Bhadra | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170024453 | Raja et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032310 | Mimnaugh | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170034018 | Parasdehgheibi et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170048121 | Hobbs et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070582 | Desai et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170085483 | Mihaly et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170208487 | Ratakonda et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170230241 | Neginhal | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250880 | Akens et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170250951 | Wang et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170289067 | Lu et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170295141 | Thubert et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170302691 | Singh et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170331747 | Singh et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170346736 | Chander et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170364380 | Frye, Jr. et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180006911 | Dickey | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180007115 | Nedeltchev et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180013670 | Kapadia et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180145906 | Yadav et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180176124 | Kancherla | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180219771 | Onno | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190036816 | Evans | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190132221 | Boutros | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101093452 | Dec 2007 | CN |
101770551 | Jul 2010 | CN |
102521537 | Jun 2012 | CN |
103023970 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103716137 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104065518 | Sep 2014 | CN |
107196807 | Sep 2017 | CN |
0811942 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1076848 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1383261 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1450511 | Aug 2004 | EP |
2045974 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2043320 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2860912 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2887595 | Jun 2015 | EP |
2009-016906 | Jan 2009 | JP |
1394338 | May 2014 | KR |
WO 2007014314 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007070711 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2008069439 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2013030830 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO 2015042171 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO 2015099778 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO 2016004075 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO 2016019523 | Feb 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion from the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 14, 2019, 15 pages, for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US19/14758. |
Boschi, E., et al., “IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Implementation Guidelines,” Apr. 1, 2008, 35 pages. |
Trammel, B., et al., “Bidirectional Flow Export Using IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX),” Jan. 1, 2008, 24 pages. |
Arista Networks, Inc., “Application Visibility and Network Telemtry using Splunk,” Arista White Paper, Nov. 2013, 11 pages. |
Australian Government Department of Defence, Intelligence and Security, “Top 4 Strategies to Mitigate Targeted Cyber Intrusions,” Cyber Security Operations Centre Jul. 2013, http://www.asd.gov.au/infosec/top-mitigations/top-4-strategies-explained.htm. |
Author Unknown, “Blacklists & Dynamic Reputation: Understanding Why the Evolving Threat Eludes Blacklists,” www.dambala.com, 9 pages, Dambala, Atlanta, GA, USA. |
Aydin, Galip, et al., “Architecture and Implementation of a Scalable Sensor Data Storage and Analysis Using Cloud Computing and Big Data Technologies,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2015, Article ID 834217, Feb. 2015, 11 pages. |
Backes, Michael, et al., “Data Lineage in Malicious Environments,” IEEE 2015, pp. 1-13. |
Bauch, Petr, “Reader's Report of Master's Thesis, Analysis and Testing of Distributed NoSQL Datastore Riak,” May 28, 2015, Brno. 2 pages. |
Bayati, Mohsen, et al., “Message-Passing Algorithms for Sparse Network Alignment,” Mar. 2013, 31 pages. |
Berezinski, Przemyslaw, et al., “An Entropy-Based Network Anomaly Detection Method,” Entropy, 2015, vol. 17, www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy, pp. 2367-2408. |
Berthier, Robin, et al. “Nfsight: Netflow-based Network Awareness Tool,” 2010, 16 pages. |
Bhuyan, Dhiraj, “Fighting Bots and Botnets,” 2006, pp. 23-28. |
Blair, Dana, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/106,006, filed Jan. 21, 2015, entitled “Monitoring Network Policy Compliance.” |
Bosch, Greg, “Virtualization,” 2010, 33 pages. |
Breen, Christopher, “MAC 911, How to dismiss Mac App Store Notifications,” Macworld.com, Mar. 24, 2014, 3 pages. |
Chandran, Midhun, et al., “Monitoring in a Virtualized Environment,” GSTF International Journal on Computing, vol. 1, No. 1, Aug. 2010. |
Chari, Suresh, et al., “Ensuring continuous compliance through reconciling policy with usage,” Proceedings of the 18th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies (SACMAT '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49-60. |
Chen, Xu, et al., “Automating network application dependency discovery: experiences, limitations, and new solutions,” 8th USENIX conference on Operating systems design and implementation (OSDI'08), Usenix Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 117-130. |
Chou, C.W., et al., “Optical Clocks and Relativity,” Science vol. 329, Sep. 24, 2010, pp. 1630-1633. |
Cisco Systems, “Cisco Network Analysis Modules (NAM) Tutorial,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Version 3.5. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Addressing Compliance from One Infrastructure: Cisco Unified Compliance Solution Framework,” 2014. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Dependency Mapping Service,” 2009. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “White Paper—New Cisco Technologies Help Customers Achieve Regulatory Compliance,” 1992-2008. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “A Cisco Guide to Defending Against Distributed Denial of Service Attacks,” May 3, 2016, 34 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Visibility and Control,” Oct. 2011, 2 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Tetration Platform Data Sheet”, Updated Mar. 5, 2018, 21 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco Lock-and-Key:Dynamic Access Lists,” http://www/cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/lock-key/7604-13,html; Updated Jul. 12, 2006, 16 pages. |
Di Lorenzo, Guisy, et al., “EXSED: An Intelligent Tool for Exploration of Social Events Dynamics from Augmented Trajectories,” Mobile Data Management (MDM), pp. 323-330, Jun. 3-6, 2013. |
Duan, Yiheng, et al., Detective: Automatically Identify and Analyze Malware Processes in Forensic Scenarios via DLLs, IEEE ICC 2015—Next Generation Networking Symposium, pp. 5691-5696. |
Feinstein, Laura, et al., “Statistical Approaches to DDoS Attack Detection and Response,” Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX '03), Apr. 2003, 12 pages. |
George, Ashley, et al., “NetPal: A Dynamic Network Administration Knowledge Base,” 2008, pp. 1-14. |
Goldsteen, Abigail, et al., “A Tool for Monitoring and Maintaining System Trustworthiness at Run Time,” REFSQ (2015), pp. 142-147. |
Hamadi, S., et al., “Fast Path Acceleration for Open vSwitch in Overlay Networks,” Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium (GIIS), Montreal, QC, pp. 1-5, Sep. 15-19, 2014. |
Heckman, Sarah, et al., “On Establishing a Benchmark for Evaluating Static Analysis Alert Prioritization and Classification Techniques,” IEEE, 2008; 10 pages. |
Hewlett-Packard, “Effective use of reputation intelligence in a security operations center,” Jul. 2013, 6 pages. |
Hideshima, Yusuke, et al., “Starmine: A Visualization System for Cyber Attacks,” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221536306, Feb. 2006, 9 pages. |
Huang, Hing-Jie, et al., “Clock Skew Based Node Identification in Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE, 2008, 5 pages. |
InternetPerils, Inc., “Control Your Internet Business Risk,” 2003-2015, https:/www.internetperils.com. |
Ives, Herbert, E., et al., “An Experimental Study of the Rate of a Moving Atomic Clock,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 28, No. 7, Jul. 1938, pp. 215-226. |
Janoff, Christian, et al., “Cisco Compliance Solution for HIPAA Security Rule Design and Implementation Guide,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Updated Nov. 14, 2015, part 1 of 2, 350 pages. |
Janoff, Christian, et al., “Cisco Compliance Solution for HIPAA Security Rule Design and Implementation Guide,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Updated Nov. 14, 2015, part 2 of 2, 588 pages. |
Kerrison, Adam, et al., “Four Steps to Faster, Better Application Dependency Mapping—Laying the Foundation for Effective Business Service Models,” BMCSoftware, 2011. |
Kim, Myung-Sup, et al. “A Flow-based Method for Abnormal Network Traffic Detection, ” IEEE, 2004, pp. 599-612. |
Kraemer, Brian, “Get to know your data center with CMDB,” TechTarget, Apr. 5, 2006, http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/118820/Get-to-know-your-data-center-with-CMDB. |
Lab SKU, “VMware Hands-on Labs—HOL-SDC-1301” Version: 20140321-160709, 2013; http://docs.hol.vmware.com/HOL-2013/holsdc-1301_html_en/ (part 1 of 2). |
Lab SKU, “VMware Hands-on Labs—HOL-SDC-1301” Version: 20140321-160709, 2013; http://does.hol.vmware.com/HOL-2013/holsdc-1301_html_en/ (part 2 of 2). |
Lachance, Michael, “Dirty Little Secrets of Application Dependency Mapping,” Dec. 26, 2007. |
Landman, Yoav, et al., “Dependency Analyzer,” Feb. 14, 2008, http://jfrog.com/confluence/display/DA/Home. |
Lee, Sihyung, “Reducing Complexity of Large-Scale Network Configuration Management,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Carniege Mellon University, 2010. |
Li, Ang, et al., “Fast Anomaly Detection for Large Data Centers,” Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010, Dec. 2010, 6 pages. |
Li, Bingbong, et al, “A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Classify Host Roles on Line Using sFlow,” in Proceedings of the first edition workshop on High performance and programmable networking, 2013, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53-60. |
Liu, Ting, et al., “Impala: A Middleware System for Managing Autonomic, Parallel Sensor Systems,” In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming(PPoPP '03), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Jun. 11-13, 2003, pp. 107-118. |
Lu, Zhonghai, et al., “Cluster-based Simulated Annealing for Mapping Cores onto 2D Mesh Networks on Chip,” Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems, pp. 1, 6, 16-18, Apr. 2008. |
Matteson, Ryan, “Depmap: Dependency Mapping of Applications Using Operating System Events: a Thesis,” Master's Thesis, California Polytechnic State University, Dec. 2010. |
Natarajan, Arun, et al., “NSDMiner: Automated Discovery of Network Service Dependencies,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers INFOCOM, Feb. 2012, 9 pages. |
Navaz, A.S. Syed, et al., “Entropy based Anomaly Detection System to Prevent DDoS Attacks in Cloud,” International Journal of computer Applications (0975-8887), vol. 62, No. 15, Jan. 2013, pp. 42-47. |
Neverfail, “Neverfail IT Continuity Architect,” 2015, https://web.archive.org.web/20150908090456/http://www.neverfailgroup.com/prod ucts/it-continuity-architect. |
Nilsson, Dennis K., et al., “Key Management and Secure Software Updates in Wireless Process Control Environments,” In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Wireless Network Security (WiSec '08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, Mar. 31-Apr. 2, 2008, pp. 100-108. |
Nunnally, Troy, et al., “P3D: A Parallel 3D Coordinate Visualization for Advanced Network Scans,” IEEE 2013, Jun. 9-13, 2013, 6 pages. |
O'Donnell, Glenn, et al., “The CMDB Imperative: How to Realize the Dream and Avoid the Nightmares,” Prentice Hall, Feb. 19, 2009. |
Ohta, Kohei, et al., “Detection, Defense, and Tracking of Internet-Wide Illegal Access in a Distributed Manner,” 2000, pp. 1-16. |
Pathway Systems International Inc., “How Blueprints does Integration,” Apr. 15, 2014, 9 pages, http://pathwaysystems.com/company-blog/. |
Pathway Systems International Inc., “What is Blueprints?” 2010-2016, http://pathwaysystems.com/blueprints-about/. |
Popa, Lucian, et al., “Macroscope: End-Point Approach to Networked Application Dependency Discovery,” CoNEXT'09, Dec. 1-4, 2009, Rome, Italy, 12 pages. |
Prasad, K. Munivara, et al., “An Efficient Detection of Flooding Attacks to Internet Threat Monitors (ITM) using Entropy Variations under Low Traffic,” Computing Communication & Networking Technologies (ICCCNT '12), Jul. 26-28, 2012, 11 pages. |
Sachan, Mrinmaya, et al., “Solving Electrical Networks to incorporate Supervision in Random Walks,” May 13-17, 2013, pp. 109-110. |
Sammarco, Matteo, et al., “Trace Selection for Improved WLAN Monitoring,” Aug. 16, 2013, pp. 9-14. |
Shneiderman, Ben, et al., “Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates,” Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 733,740, Sep.-Oct. 2006. |
Thomas, R., “Bogon Dotted Decimal List,” Version 7.0, Team Cymru NOC, Apr. 27, 2012, 5 pages. |
Wang, Ru, et al., “Learning directed acyclic graphs via bootstarp aggregating,” 2014, 47 pages, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2098. |
Wang, Yongjun, et al., “A Network Gene-Based Framework for Detecting Advanced Persistent Threats,” Nov. 2014, 7 pages. |
Witze, Alexandra, “Special relativity aces time trial, ‘Time dilation’ predicted by Einstein confirmed by lithium ion experiment,” Nature, Sep. 19, 2014, 3 pages. |
Woodberg, Brad, “Snippet from Juniper SRX Series” Jun. 17, 2013, 1 page, O'Reilly Media, Inc. |
Zatrochova, Zuzana, “Analysis and Testing of Distributed NoSQL Datastore Riak,” Spring, 2015, 76 pages. |
Zhang, Yue, et al., “Cantina: A Content-Based Approach to Detecting Phishing Web Sites,” May 8-12, 2007, pp. 639-648. |
Al-Fuqaha, Ala, et al., “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,” IEEE Communication Surveys & Tutorials. vol. 17, No. 4, Nov. 18, 2015, pp. 2347-2376. |
Baek, Kwang-Hyun, et al., “Preventing Theft of Quality of Service on Open Platforms,” 2005 Workshop of the 1st International Conference on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communication Networks, 2005, 12 pages. |
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., “Chapter 5—Configuring Virtual LANs (VLANs),” Jun. 2009, 38 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc. “Cisco, Nexus 3000 Series NX-OS Release Notes, Release 5.0(3)U3(1),” Feb. 29, 2012, Part No. OL-26631-01, 16 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco—VPN Client User Guide for Windows,” Release 4.6, Aug. 2004, 148 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco 4710 Application Control Engine Appliance Hardware Installation Guide,” Nov. 2007, 66 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Data Center Network Architecture and Solutions Overview,” Feb. 2006, 19 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco IOS Configuration Fundamentals Configuration Guide: Using Autoinstall and Setup,”Release 12.2, first published Apr. 2001, last updated Sep. 2003, 32 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco VN-Link: Virtualization-Aware Networking,” White Paper, Mar. 2009, 10 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco, Nexus 5000 Series and Cisco Nexus 2000 Series Release Notes, Cisco NX-Os Release 5.1(3)N2(1b), NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1a) and NX-OS Release 5.1(3)N2(1),” Sep. 5, 2012, Part No. OL-26652-03 CO, 24 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Nexus 3000 Series NX-OS Fundamentals Configuration Guide, Release 5.0(3)U3(1): Using PowerOn Auto Provisioning,” Feb. 29, 2012, Part No. OL-26544-01, 10 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Quick Start Guide, Cisco ACE 4700 Series Application Control Engine Appliance,” Software Ve740rsion A5(1.0), Sep. 2011, 138 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Routing and Bridging Guide, Cisco ACE Application Control Engine,” Software Version A5(1.0), Sep. 2011, 248 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “VMWare and Cisco Virtualization Solution: Scale Virtual Machine Networking,” Jul. 2009, 4 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Remote Integrated Service Engine for Citrix NetScaler Appliances and Cisco Nexus 7000 Series Switches Configuration Guide,” Last modified Apr. 29, 2014, 78 pages. |
Cisco Technology, Inc., “Cisco IOS Software Release 12.4T Features and Hardware Support,” Feb. 2009, 174 pages. |
Cisco Systems, Inc., “Cisco Application Control Engine (ACE) Troubleshooting Guide—Understanding the ACE Module Architecture and Traffic Flow,” Mar. 11, 2011, 6 pages. |
Costa, Raul, et al., “An Intelligent Alarm Management System for Large-Scale Telecommunication Companies,” In Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Oct. 2009, 14 pages. |
De Carvalho, Tiago Filipe Rodrigues, “Root Cause Analysis in Large and Complex Networks,” Dec. 2008, Repositorio.ul.pt, pp. 1-55. |
Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents, “FIPA Agent Message Transport Service Specification,” Dec. 3, 2002, http://www.fipa.org; 15 pages. |
Gia, Tuan Nguyen, et al., “Fog Computing in Healthcare Internet of Things: A Case Study on ECG Feature Extraction,” 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Oct. 26, 15, pp. 356-363. |
Joseph, Dilip, et al., “Modeling Middleboxes,” IEEE Network, Sep./Oct. 2008, pp. 20-25. |
Kent, S., et al. “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol,” Network Working Group, Nov. 1998, 67 pages. |
Online Collins English Dictionary, 1 page (Year: 2018). |
Theodorakopoulos, George, et al., “On Trust Models and Trust Evaluation Metrics for Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. vol. 24, Issue 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 318-328. |
Voris, Jonathan, et al., “Bait and Snitch: Defending Computer Systems with Decoys,” Columbia University Libraries, Department of Computer Science, 2013, pp. 1-25. |
Zeng, Sai, et al., “Managing Risk in Multi-node Automation of Endpoint Management,” 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), 2014, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190230041 A1 | Jul 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62622008 | Jan 2018 | US |