Patent Application
20230106979
The present invention relates to a machine dishwash detergent product which provides good cleaning at low wash temperatures and which is suitable to comply with the technical Ecolabel criteria as specified in the EU Commission Decision 2017/1216
Machine dishwash detergent products typically contain several different active components, including builders, sequestrants, surfactants, enzymes and bleaching agents. Surfactants are employed to remove stains and soil and to disperse the released components into the cleaning liquid. Enzymes help to remove stubborn stains of proteins, starch and lipids by hydrolyzing these components. Bleach is used to remove stains by oxidizing the components that make up these stains. In order to reduce the negative effects of in particular calcium and magnesium ions on stain/soil removal so called ‘builders’ (complexing agents) are commonly applied in detergent products.
There is increasing concern about the impact of machine dishwash detergent products on the environment. This means consumers nowadays favor machine dishwash products which have reduced environmental impact during their life cycle. In order to communicate that a machine dishwash detergent product has reduced environmental impact, manufacturers can apply for appropriate recognized certifications, such as the EU Ecolabel (EU Commission Decision 2017/1216 ‘establishing the EU Ecolabel criteria for dishwasher detergents’).
The EU Ecolabel criteria sets-out technical criteria that a machine dishwash detergent product must meet in order for a manufacturer to be allowed to apply the Ecolabel certification mark onto their products. The criteria sets-out strong limitations on the type and amounts of many ingredients. For example it sets upper limits of the amount of total non-biodegradable detergent actives as well as outright excluding the presence of others. Examples of not-readily biodegradable detergent actives can be found in the ‘Detergent ingredient database’ list (DID list) available on the EU Ecolabel website (https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/ecolabel/pdf/did_list/didlist_part_a_en.pdf).
The problem is that many of these restrictions make it difficult to provide machine dishwash detergent products which can provide good cleaning (e.g. high shine/low spotting/low filming) of dishware especially at low temperatures.
It is an object to provide a machine dishwash detergent product capable of delivering good cleaning, e.g. high shine (low spotting and filming), in machine dishwash detergent composition.
The above objects is achieved in a first aspect of the invention by a unit dose or non-unit dose machine dishwash detergent composition comprising:
atranol; chloroatranol; Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA); Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and its salts; glutaraldehyde; microplastics; nitromusks and polycyclic musks; perfluorinated alkylates; reactive chlorine compounds; rhodamine B; sodium hydroxyl methyl glycinate; triclosan; 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate.
It was surprisingly observed that polycarboxylate comprising acrylate monomer and at least one phosphonate present, in the weight ratio of polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers to phosphonate, of 1.3:1 to 5:1, provides an unexpected benefit to machine dishwash compositions, namely imparting high shine (low spotting and filming).
In addition, it was found that this benefit was obtained in dishwash detergent composition that meets the technical EU Ecolabel criteria, in the weight ratio of polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers to phosphonate, of 1.3:1 to 5:1, preferably of from 1.4:1 to 4:1, more preferably from 1.5:1 to 3:1, even more preferably 1.6:1 to 2.4:1.
In a second aspect, the invention also relates to a process of washing dishware in a machine dishwasher, comprising the following steps:
wherein the detergent composition is free of intentionally added phosphates; alkyl phenol ethoxylates; atranol; chloroatranol; Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA); Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and its salts; glutaraldehyde; microplastics; nitromusks and polycyclic musks; perfluorinated alkylates; reactive chlorine compounds; rhodamine B; sodium hydroxyl methyl glycinate; triclosan; 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate.
In a third aspect, the invention relates to the use of polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers to phosphonate, in a weight ratio in the range of from 1.3:1 to 5:1, preferably of from 1.4:1 to 4:1, more preferably from 1.5:1 to 3:1, even more preferably 1.6:1 to 2.4:1, for enhancing the cleaning in detergent compositions which preferably meet the technical criteria as set out in the EU Commission Decision 2017/2016 ‘establishing the EU Ecolabel criteria for dishwasher detergents’.
Weight percentage (wt. %) is based on the total weight of the detergent composition unless otherwise indicated or as made clear from the context. It will be appreciated that the total weight amount of ingredients will not exceed 100 wt. %. Whenever an amount or concentration of a component is quantified herein, unless indicated otherwise, the quantified amount or quantified concentration relates to said component per se, even though it may be common practice to add such a component in the form of a solution or of a blend with one or more other ingredients. It is furthermore to be understood that the verb “to comprise” and its conjugations is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. Finally, reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the elements is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements. The indefinite article “a” or “an” thus usually means “at least one”. Unless otherwise specified all measurements are taken at standard conditions. Whenever a parameter, such as a concentration or a ratio, is said to be less than a certain upper limit it should be understood that in the absence of a specified lower limit the lower limit for said parameter is 0.
In the context of the present application, the term “free of” or “the composition is free of” means that the composition comprises less than 0.1 wt. %, by weight of the total composition, of the specified component(s).
Preferably, the term “free of” or “the composition is free of” means that the composition comprises less than 0.01 wt. %, by weight of the total composition, of the specified component(s), more preferably less than 0.001 wt. % of the specified components and most preferably less than 0.0001 wt. % of the specified component(s).
Preferably, the term “the composition is preferably free of” means that the composition comprises less than 0.1 wt. %, more preferably less than 0.01 wt. % of phosphates; alkyl phenol ethoxylates; atranol; chloroatranol; Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA); Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and its salts; glutaraldehyde; microplastics; nitromusks and polycyclic musks; perfluorinated alkylates; reactive chlorine compounds;
rhodamine B; sodium hydroxyl methyl glycinate; triclosan; 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate.
The present composition comprises polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers. Examples of suitable polycarboxylates comprising acrylic acid monomers include poly(acrylic acid) (PAA, trade name Carbomer), PAA/PMA polymers (comprising acrylic acid monomers and maleic acid monomers), lauryl methacrylate/acrylic acid copolymers and polyacrylate with methyl methacrylate. Also suitable is a terpolymer containing polyacrylate with 2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulphonic acid such as Acumer 3100 supplied by Dow.
Also suitable are water soluble dispersing polymers prepared from an allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer, a methallyl sulfonic acid monomer, a copolymerizable nonionic monomer and an acrylic acid monomer as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,547,612. Polymers of this type include Alcosperse™240 (Nouryon).
Polymers and co-polymers of acrylic acid having a molecular weight between 500 and 200,000 can also be used, such as homo-polymeric polycarboxylic acid compounds with acrylic acid as the monomeric unit. The average weight of such homo-polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 1,000 to 100,000 particularly from 3,000 to 10,000 e.g. Sokolan™ PA25 from BASF or Acusol™425 from Dow. Also suitable are polycarboxylates co-polymers derived from monomers of acrylic acid and maleic acid, such as CP5 from BASF. The average molecular weight of these polymers in the acid form preferably ranges from 4,000 to 70,000. Modified polycarboxylates like Sokalan™ CP42, Sokalan™ CP50 from BASF or Alcoguard™4160 from Nouryon may also be used. Mixture of anti-scaling agents may also be used. Particularly useful is a mixture of organic phosphonates and polymers of acrylic acid.
In a preferable embodiment, the polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers have an average molecular weight of 1,000 to 100,000 g/mole, more preferably 2,000 to 50,000 g/mole, even more preferably 3,000 to 15,000 g/mole and most preferably 3,500 to 8,500 g/mole.
The average molecular weight of a polymer can be experimentally determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC). The parameters are as follows:
It is preferable if the level of polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers ranges from 0.2 to 6 wt. % of the total composition, preferably from 0.5 to 5 wt. %, and further preferred from 1 to 4 wt. %.
Phosphonates are used in machine dishwashing formulations as sequestrants for cations, such as Mg2+ and Ca2+. Suitable phosphonates can be selected from the group consisting of α-hydroxy-2 phenyl ethyl diphosphonate, ethylene diphosphonate, hydroxy 1,1-hexylidene, vinylidene 1,1-diphosphonate, 1,2-dihydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate, hydroxy-ethylene 1,1-diphosphonate and partial or complete alkali or alkaline salts of any of the aforementioned phosphonate compounds. More preferred is hydroxy-ethylene 1,1-diphosphonate (EDHP) and 2-phosphono-butane, 1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid (Bayhibit ex Bayer).
The detergent composition beneficially comprises from 0.5 to 5 wt. % of EDHP, more preferably from 1 to 4 wt. % and even more preferably from 1.5 to 3.0 wt. %.
In a preferred embodiment the phosphonate is selected from the group consisting of α-hydroxy-2 phenyl ethyl diphosphonate, ethylene diphosphonate, hydroxy 1,1-hexylidene, vinylidene 1,1-diphosphonate, 1,2-dihydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonate, hydroxy-ethylene 1,1-diphosphonate or a combination thereof. Most preferred is hydroxy-ethylene 1,1-diphosphonate (EDHP) and 2-phosphono-butane, 1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid.
Preferably, the machine dishwasher composition comprises, if in unit dose from 0.1 to 0.5 gram, more preferably 0.2 to 0.4 gram and most preferable 0.25 to 0.35 gram per unit dose, and if in non-unit dose form from 0.7 to 3.5 wt. %, more preferably 1.4 to 2.8 wt. % and most preferably 1.75 to 2.45 wt. %, in total of phosphonate.
In a more preferred embodiment, where the composition is in a non-dose unit form, the machine dishwashing composition comprises a combined amount of sodium salts of EDHP (1-Hydroxyethane 1,1-diphosphonic acid) and polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers of from 0.7 to 6.3 wt. %, more preferably of from 2.1 to 5.6 wt. %.
In a more preferred embodiment, where the composition is in a dose unit form, the machine dishwashing composition comprises a combined amount of sodium salts of EDHP and polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers of from 0.1 to 0.9 gram per unit dose, more preferably of from 0.3 to 0.8 gram per unit dose and most preferably 0.4 to 0.7 gram per unit dose.
The present composition comprises polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers and phosphonate in the weight ratio in the range of from 1.3:1 to 5:1 (polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers: phosphonate). More preferably the composition comprises polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers and phosphonate in the weight ratio in the range of from of from 1.4:1 to 4:1, more preferably from 1.5:1 to 3:1, even more preferably 1.6:1 to 2.4:1.
In a preferred embodiment of the current invention, the detergent composition comprises at least one additional dispersing polymer. Additional dispersing polymers as are beneficially chosen from the group of anti-spotting agents and/or anti-scaling agents. Examples of suitable anti-spotting polymeric agents include hydrophobically modified polycarboxylic acids such as Acusol™460 ND (ex Dow) and Alcosperse™747 by Nouryon, whereas also synthetic clays, and preferably those synthetic clays which have a high surface area are very useful to prevent spots, in particular those formed where soil and dispersed remnants are present at places where the water collects on the glass and spots formed when the water subsequently evaporates.
Suitable anti-scaling agents are water soluble dispersing polymers prepared from an allyloxybenzenesulfonic acid monomer, a methallyl sulfonic acid monomer, a copolymerizable nonionic monomer and a copolymerizable olefinically unsaturated carboxylic acid monomer as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,547,612. Polymers of this type include sodium methallyl sulphonate and sulphophenol methallyl ether.
It is preferable if the level of additional dispersing polymers ranges from 0.2 to 6 wt. % of the total composition, preferably from 0.5 to 5 wt. %, and further preferred from 1 to 4 wt. %.
The present composition may suitably contain a non-surfactant, water-soluble, liquid binder, e.g. in a concentration of 0-50% by weight of the continuous phase. Examples of such liquid binders include polyethylene glycols, polypropylene glycols, glycerol, glycerol carbonate, ethylene glycol, propylene gylcol and propylene carbonate. Of course, in view of the detergent composition of the invention preferred are polyethylene glycols with a molecular weight of at most 4000. The advantageous amount of polyethylene glycols with a molecular weight of at most 4000 is below 5 wt. % more preferably below 3 wt. %, below 2 wt. %, below 1 wt. % and in fact most beneficially the detergent composition is free of polyethylene glycols.
The builder is suitably selected from citric acid, aminopolycarboxylates and builder materials may be selected from 1) calcium sequestrant materials, 2) precipitating materials, 3) calcium ion-exchange materials and 4) mixtures thereof. Water used to provide a wash liquor in the dishwasher usually contains calcium, magnesium, and metallic cations (iron, copper, and manganese). Builders remove the hard water ions typically through precipitation, chelation, or ion exchange. In addition, they help remove soil by dispersion. A beneficial amount of builder is from 10 to 80 wt. %, more preferably from 20 to 75 wt. %, even more preferably from 30 to 70 wt. % and still even more preferably from 40 to 65 wt. %.
Examples of precipitating builder materials include sodium carbonate. Examples of calcium ion-exchange builder materials include the various types of water-insoluble crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicates, of which zeolites are the best known representatives, e.g. zeolite A, zeolite B (also known as zeolite P), zeolite C, zeolite X, zeolite Y and also the zeolite P-type as described in EP-A-0,384,070. Zeolite and carbonate (carbonate (including bicarbonate and sesquicarbonate) are preferred builders, whereof carbonate is the more preferred.
The composition may contain as builder a crystalline aluminosilicate, preferably an alkali metal aluminosilicate, more preferably a sodium aluminosilicate. This is typically present at a level of less than 15 wt. %. Aluminosilicates are materials having the general formula:
0.8-1.5 (M2O.Al2O3) 0.8-6 (SiO2)
where M is a monovalent cation, preferably sodium. These materials contain some bound water and are required to have a calcium ion exchange capacity of at least 50 mg CaO/g. The preferred sodium aluminosilicates contain 1.5-3.5 SiO2 units in the formula above. They can be prepared readily by reaction between sodium silicate and sodium aluminate, as amply described in the literature. The ratio of surfactants to alumuminosilicate (where present) is preferably greater than 5:2, more preferably greater than 3:1.
Aminopolycarboxylates (chiral or non-chiral) are well known in the detergent industry and sometimes referred to as aminocarboxylate chelants. They are generally appreciated as being strong builders. Examples include glutamic acid N,N-diacetic acid (GLDA), methylglycinediacetic acid (MGDA), ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS), iminodisuccinic acid (IDS), iminodimalic acid (IDM), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), iminodiacetic acid (IDA), hydroxyethyliminodiacetic acid (HEIDA) aspartic acid diethoxysuccinic acid (AES) aspartic acid-N,N-diacetic acid (ASDA), hydroxyethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (HEDTA), hydroxyethylethylene-diaminetriacetic acid (HEEDTA), iminodifumaric (I DF), iminoditartaric acid (IDT), iminodimaleic acid (I DMAL), ethylenediaminedifumaric acid (EDDF), ethylenediaminedimalic acid (EDDM), ethylenediamineditartaric acid (EDDT), ethylenediaminedimaleic acid and (EDDMAL), dipicolinic acid.
Preferred aminopolycarboxylate builders are GLDA, MGDA and/or EDDS, of which GLDA and MGDA are the more preferred, and MGDA is most preferred.
It is advantageous that the builder of the detergent composition comprises a builder selected from at least one of a) aminopolycarboxylate, b) citric acid and/or its alkalimetal salt or c) carbonate. The builder preferably comprises builders from a) and b); a) and c) or b) and c); and more preferably comprises builders from a), b) and c). Beneficially the detergent composition comprises:
The composition of the invention preferably comprises from 1 to 25 wt. %, more preferably from 5 to 20 wt. % and even more preferably from 8 to 15 wt. % of bleach. Inorganic and/or organic bleaches can be used. Bleach may be selected from peroxides, organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof.
Examples of peroxides are acids and corresponding salts of monopersulphate, perborate monohydrate, perborate tetrahydrate, and percarbonate. Organic peracids useful herein include alkyl peroxy acids and aryl peroxyacids such as peroxybenzoic acid and ring-substituted peroxybenzoic acids (e.g. peroxy-alpha-naphthoic acid), aliphatic and substituted aliphatic monoperoxy acids (e.g. peroxylauric acid and peroxystearic acid), and phthaloyl amido peroxy caproic acid (PAP). Typical diperoxy acids useful herein include alkyl diperoxy acids and aryldiperoxy acids, such as 1,12-di-peroxy-dodecanedioic acid (DPDA), 1,9-diperoxyazelaic acid, diperoxybrassylic acid, diperoxysebacic acid and diperoxy-isophthalic acid, and 2-decyldiperoxybutane-1, 4-dioic acid.
Preferably, the bleach of the present composition is selected from peroxides (including peroxide salts such as sodium percarbonate), organic peracids, salts of organic peracids and combinations thereof. More preferably, the bleach is a peroxide. Most preferably, the bleach is a percarbonate. Further preferred, the bleach is a coated percarbonate.
The detergent composition may contain one or more bleach activators such as peroxyacid bleach precursors. Peroxyacid bleach precursors are well known in the art. As non-limiting examples can be named N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetyl ethylene diamine (TAED), sodium nonanoyloxybenzene sulphonate (SNOBS), sodium benzoyloxybenzene sulphonate (SBOBS) and the cationic peroxyacid precursor (SPCC) as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,015. The detergent composition of the invention preferably comprises from 0.01 to 15 wt. % of bleach activator, more preferably from 0.2 to 10 wt. % and even more preferably from 1.0 to 6 wt. %.
Bleach catalysts function by oxidizing typically via peroxide or a peracid to form a bleaching species. They require the presence of an oxidizable soil so that they can be reduced back to the starting bleach activator state.
The bleach catalyst according used in the invention is a manganese complex of formula (A):
[LnMnmXp]zYq
wherein Mn is manganese, which can be in the II, III, IV or V oxidation state or mixtures thereof; n and m are independent integers from 1-4; X represents a co-ordination or bridging species; p is an integer from 0-12; Y is a counter-ion, the type of which is dependent on the charge z of the complex which can be positive, zero or negative; q=z/[charge Y]; and L is a ligand being a macrocyclic organic molecule of the general formula:
wherein R1 and R2 can each be zero, H, alkyl or aryl optionally substituted; t and t′ are each independent integers from 2-3; each D can independently be N, NR, PR, O or S, where R is H, alkyl or aryl, optionally substituted; and s is an integer from 2-5.
Such bleach activators are described in EP0458397A2.
The bleach activators of the invention are preferably one or more of:
Of these the following are the more preferred:
The amount of the bleach catalyst is from 0.001 to below 0.010 wt. %, as based on actives levels. The preferred form of adding the bleach catalyst is as part of a bleach catalyst granule comprising less than 5 wt. % of active bleach catalyst. The use of such granules improves the accurate dosing of the bleach catalyst. The preferred level of the bleach catalyst (i.e. as active) is from 0.002 to 0.01 wt. %, preferably from 0.003 to 0.01 wt. %, more preferably from 0.005 to 0.009 wt. %, even more preferred from 0.007 to 0.009 wt. %. The detergent composition may comprise further bleach catalyst of a type not according to the invention, but this is not preferred.
The bleach catalyst is preferably physically separated from the bleach in the detergent composition to prevent premature bleaching. Preferred ways of separating are by incorporation into different solid parts of the detergent composition (e.g. different layers of a tablet) and/or by into different compartments of a multi-compartmental capsule and/or by addition of the bleach catalyst as an encapsulate.
It is preferred that the detergent product of the invention comprises 0.1 to 30 wt. % of surfactant, more preferably 0.5 to 25 wt. % and even more preferably 1.5 to 15 wt. %. The surfactant can be non-ionic or anionic or a mixture thereof.
The nonionic and anionic surfactants of the surfactant system may be chosen from the surfactants described “Surface Active Agents” Vol. 1, by Schwartz & Perry, lnterscience 1949, Vol. 2 by Schwartz, Perry & Berch, lnterscience 1958, in the current edition of “McCutcheon's Emulsifiers and Detergents” published by Manufacturing Confectioners Company or in “Tenside-Taschenbuch”, H. Stache, 2nd Edn., Carl Hauser Verlag, 1981. Preferably the surfactants used are saturated.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment, the composition contains from 0.1 to 15 wt. %, more preferably from 0.5 to 10 wt. % and most preferably from 1 to 5 wt. % of a nonionic surfactant or a mixture of two or more non-ionic surfactants. Advantageously a combination of at least two nonionic surfactants is used.
Examples of nonionic surfactants that may be employed in the present composition include the condensation products of hydrophobic alkyl, alkenyl, or alkyl aromatic compounds bearing functional groups having free reactive hydrogen available for condensation with hydrophilic alkylene oxide, such as ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, butylene oxide, polyethylene oxide or polyethylene glycol to form nonionic surfactants. Examples of such functional groups include hydroxy, carboxy, mercapto, amino or amido groups. Examples of useful hydrophobes of commercial nonionic surfactants include C8-C18 alkyl fatty alcohols, C8-C14 alkyl phenols, C8-C18 alkyl fatty acids, C8-C18 alkyl mercaptans, C8-C18 alkyl fatty amines, C8-C18 alkyl amides and C8-C18 alkyl fatty alkanolamides. Accordingly, suitable ethoxylated fatty alcohols may be chosen from ethoxylated cetyl alcohol, ethoxylated ketostearyl alcohol, ethoxylated isotridecyl alcohol, ethoxylated lauric alcohol, ethoxylated oleyl alcohol and mixtures thereof. Examples of suitable nonionic surfactants for use in the invention are found in the low- to non-foaming ethoxylated/propoxylated straight-chain alcohols of the Plurafac™ LF series, supplied by the BASF and the Synperonic™ NCA series supplied by Croda. Also of interest are the end-capped ethoxylated alcohols available as the SLF 18 series from BASF and the alkylpolyethylene glycol ethers made from a linear, saturated C16-C18 fatty alcohol of the Lutensol™ AT series, supplied by BASF. Other suitable nonionics to apply in the composition of the invention are modified fatty alcohol polyglycolethers available as Dehypon™ 127, Dehypon™ 3697 GRA or Dehypon™ Wet from BASF/Cognis. Also suitable for use herein are nonionics from the Lutensol™ TO series of BASF, which are alkylpolyethylene glycol ethers made from a saturated iso-C13 alcohol.
Amineoxide surfactants may also be used in the present invention as anti-redeposition surfactant. Examples of suitable amineoxide surfactants are C10-C18 alkyl dimethylamine oxide and C10-C18 acylamido alkyl dimethylamine oxide.
If an anionic surfactant is used, the total amount present preferably is less than 5 wt. %, and more preferably not more than 2 wt. %. Furthermore, if an anionic surfactant is present, it is preferred that an antifoam agent to suppress foaming is present. Examples of suitable anionic surfactants are methylester sulphonates or sodium lauryl sulphate.
It is preferred that the detergent composition of the invention comprises enzymes which degrade, alter or facilitate the degradation or alteration of biochemical soils and stains encountered in cleansing situations so as to remove more easily the soil or stain from the object being washed to make the soil or stain more removable in a subsequent cleansing step. Both degradation and alteration can improve soil removal.
Examples of enzymes suitable for use in the cleaning compositions of this invention include lipases, cellulases, peroxidases, proteases (proteolytic enzymes), amylases (amylolytic enzymes) and others. Well-known and preferred examples of these enzymes are proteases, amylases, cellulases, peroxidases, mannanases, pectate lyases and lipases and combinations thereof. The enzymes most commonly used in detergent compositions are proteolytic and amylolytic enzymes. Enzymes may be added in liquid or in encapsulated form. In a preferred embodiment of this invention the enzymes are present in encapsulated form. Well know enzyme stabilizers such as polyalcohols/borax, calcium, formate or protease inhibitors like 4-formylphenyl boronic acid may also be present in the composition
The proteolytic enzymes in this invention include metalloproteases and serine proteases, including neutral or alkaline microbial serine protease, such as subtilisins (EC 3.4.21.62).
The proteolytic enzymes for use in the present invention can be those derived from bacteria of fungi. Chemically or genetically modified mutants (variants) are included. Preferred proteolytic enzymes are those derived from Bacillus, such as B. lentus, B. gibsonii, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. alkalophilus, B. amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus pumilus, of which B. lentus and B. gibsonii are most preferred. Examples of such proteolytic enzymes are Excellase™, Properasen™, Purafect™Purafect™Prime, Purafect™Ox by Genencor; and those sold under the trade names Blaze™,Ovozyme™, Savinase™, Alcalase™, Everlase™, Esperase™, Relase™, Polarzyme™, Liquinase™ and Coronase™ by Novozymes. Preferred levels of protease are from 0.1 to 10 mg, more preferably from 0.2 to 5 mg, most preferably 0.4 to about 4 mg active protease per gram of the detergent composition.
The amylolytic enzymes for use in the present invention can be those derived from bacteria or fungi. Chemically or genetically modified mutants (variants) are included. Preferred amylolytic enzyme is an alpha-amylase derived from a strain of Bacillus, such as B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. amyloliquefaciens or B. stearothermophilus. Examples of such amylolytic enzymes are produced and distributed under the trade name of Stainzyme™, Stainzyme™ Plus, Termamyl™, Natalase™ and Duramyl™ by Novozymes; as well as Powerase™, Purastar™, Purastar™ Oxam by Genencor. Stainzyme™, Stainzyme™ Plus and Powerase™ are the preferred amylases. Preferred levels of amylase are from 0.01 to 5, more preferably from 0.02 to 2, most preferably from 0.05 to about 1 mg active amylase per gram of the detergent composition.
The enzymes may suitably be incorporated in the detergent composition in liquid or in encapsulated form. In case the composition has a pH of 9.0 and more it is preferred to employ enzymes in encapsulated form. Examples of encapsulated forms are enzyme granule types D, E and HS by Genencor and granule types, T, GT, TXT and Evity™ of Novozymes. In case the pH is less than 9.0 it can be advantageous to employ non-encapsulated enzymes. In accordance with a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the composition contains active protease and the protease activity of the freshly prepared composition decreases by not more than 70%, more preferably by not more than 50% and most preferably by not more than 20% when the composition is stored in a closed container for 8 weeks at 20 degrees Celsius.
Advantageously the detergent composition comprises a combination of amylase and protease.
Glass corrosion inhibitors can prevent the irreversible corrosion and iridescence of glass surfaces in machine dishwash detergents. The claimed composition may suitably contain glass corrosion inhibitors. Suitable glass corrosion agents can be selected from the group the group consisting of salts of zinc, bismuth, aluminum, tin, magnesium, calcium, strontium, titanium, zirconium, manganese, lanthanum, mixtures thereof and precursors thereof. Most preferred are salts of bismuth, magnesium or zinc or combinations thereof. Usual preferred levels of glass corrosion inhibitors in the present composition are 0.01-2 wt. %, more preferably 0.01-0.5 wt. %. Anti-tarnishing agents may prevent or reduce the tarnishing, corrosion or oxidation of metals such as silver, copper, aluminum and stainless steel. Anti-tarnishing agents such as benzotriazole or bisbenzotriazole and substituted or substituted derivatives thereof and those described in EP723577 (Unilever) may also be included in the composition. Other anti-tarnishing agents that may be included in the detergent composition are mentioned in WO 94/26860 and WO 94/26859. Suitable redox active agents are for example complexes chosen from the group of cerium, cobalt, hafnium, gallium, manganese, titanium, vanadium, zinc or zirconium, in which the metal are in the oxidation state of II, II, IV V or VI.
In view of reducing the environmental impact of the detergent composition of the invention the detergent composition is free of zinc and bismuth.
Preferably the detergent product of the invention comprises one or more colorants, perfumes or a mixture thereof in an amount of from 0.0001 to 8 wt. %, more preferably from 0.001 to 4 wt. % and even more preferably from 0.001 to 1.5 wt. %. Perfume is preferably present in the range from 0.1 to 1 wt. %. Many suitable examples of perfumes are provided in the CTFA (Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association) 1992 International Buyers Guide, published by CFTA Publications and OPD 1993 Chemicals Buyers Directory 80th Annual Edition, published by Schnell Publishing Co. In perfume mixtures preferably 15 to 25 wt. % are top notes. Top notes are defined by Poucher (Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 6(2):80 [1955]). Preferred top-notes are selected from citrus oils, linalool, linalyl acetate, lavender, dihydromyrcenol, rose oxide and cis-3-hexanol.
The detergent composition of the invention restricts the total amount of a number of not readily biodegradable ingredients to be at most 14.3 wt. %, preferably at most 12 wt. %, more preferably at most 10 wt. %, even more preferably at most 7 wt. %, if present at all. These ingredients are useful actives in the field of machine dish wash:
linear polydimethylsiloxanes.
However, these compounds are not-readily biodegradable under aerobic and anaerobic conditions and hence they tend to undesirably persist in the environment after leaving the dishwasher (e.g. with the dishwasher waste-water stream). Specific chemical structures which fall under these classes of molecules but which are readily biodegradable are hence excluded from the restriction that these may be present in an amount as indicated in the detergent composition of the invention.
The preferred process of washing dishware in a machine dishwasher using the detergent composition according to the invention is to add a dosage amount of detergent composition which provides at most 1 gram per dose of the combined weight of these not-readily biodegradable compounds.
Hence when the form of the detergent product is in unit-dose form (e.g. a multi-compartmental capsule or a tablet) than the total amount of these not-readily biodegradable ingredients is at most 1 gram, preferably at most 0.8, more preferably at most 0.7 gram, even more preferably at most 0.5 gram per unit dose.
Hence when the form of the detergent product is not in unit-dose form (e.g. as detergent liquid in a pouring bottle or as loose powder in a dosing carton either containing a plurality of dosages) than the total amount of these not-readily biodegradable ingredients is at most 14.3 wt. % based on the total weight of the composition. For such non-unit dose formats the concentration of such not-readily biodegradable ingredients is preferably at at most 12.0 wt. %, 10.0 wt. %, 7.0 wt. %, 5.0 wt. %, 3.0 wt. %, 2.0 wt. % % and even more preferably at most 1.0 wt. %.
Furthermore, in the detergent composition of the invention the amount of:
The detergent composition is preferably free of all the following ingredients:
These compounds are excluded for posing further environmental concerns such as eutrophication (phosphates), allergenicity, (suspected) toxicity and/or other environmental concerns (microplastics).
The detergent product of the invention may be in any suitable form.
Preferably, the composition is a unit dose machine dishwash detergent composition, preferably a wrapped unit dose, wherein the unit dose is a multicompartmental capsule or a tablet, even more preferably a tablet and still even more preferably a multi-layer tablet.
The detergent product is preferably provided as a water-soluble or water-dispersible unit dose. Particularly preferred unit doses are in the form of pouches, which comprise at least one further non-shape stable ingredient, such as a liquid and/or powder; or in the form of tablets. For ease of use, the unit dose is sized and shaped as to fit in the detergent cup of a conventional house-hold machine dishwasher, as is known in the art. In a preferred embodiment, the unit-dose detergent product has a unit weight of 5 to 50 grams, more preferably a unit weight of 7 to 30 grams, even more preferably a unit weight of 10 to 25 grams and even more beneficially from 12 to 20 grams.
Advantageous unit dose pouches have more than one compartment.
Advantageous unit dose tablets are those which have more than one visually distinct tablet region. Such regions can be formed by e.g. two distinct (colored) layers or a tablet having a main body and a distinct insert, such as forming a nested egg. However oriented, one benefit of using multi-compartmental pouches/multi-region tablets is that it can be used to reduce/prevent undesired chemical reactions between two or more ingredients during storage by physical segregation.
The more preferred unit dose form is a tablet, in particular a multi-layer tablet and even more preferably a multi-layer tablet comprising at least one white part and a colored part.
Advantageously the unit dose detergent product is wrapped to improve hygiene and consumer safety. The wrapper advantageously is based on water-soluble film which preferably a polyvinylalcohol (PVA) based film. Preferably, the dishwasher composition is a wrapped unit dose. Such wrapping prevents direct contact of the detergent product with the skin of the consumer when placing the unit dose in the detergent cup/holder of a e.g. machine dishwasher. A further benefit of course is that the consumer also does not need to remove a water-soluble wrapping before use.
In case of the detergent products being in the form of unit doses and non-unit dose powders, the detergent composition is suitably contained in a package. In a preferred embodiment, the package is preferably based on paper (e.g. cardboard). In case of non-unit dose liquids or gels, the package is preferably in the form of a plastic bottle with an internal volume of from 100 to 2000 ml and preferably of from 400 to 1600 ml.
The package (i.e. the primary container which holds the detergent product, such as the plurality of unit doses) preferably contains an outwardly visible logo of the EU Ecolabel.
Preferably, the unit dose is contained in a packaging container and the container contains technical information regarding one or more of the following, which are of course, if present, preferably outwardly visible:
a) the dishwasher composition has limited impact on the aquatic environment; and/or
b) the dishwasher composition comprises a restricted amount of hazardous substances; and/or
c) the dishwasher composition has been tested for cleaning performance; and/or
d) a recommended dosage for use of the dishwasher composition in a standard dishware load is indicated;
e) the reuse, recycling and correct disposal of the packaging; wherein technical information on the reuse, recycling and correct disposal of the packaging is preferred.
The detergent products according to the invention can be made using known methods and equipment in the field of detergent product manufacturing.
The invention also relates to a process of washing dishware in a machine dishwasher, comprising the following steps:
nitromusks and polycyclic musks; perfluorinated alkylates; reactive chlorine compounds; rhodamine B; sodium hydroxyl methyl glycinate; triclosan; 3-iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate.
(Automatic) machine dishwashers have been in use in domestic households for decades. The dishwasher generally operates by subjecting soiled dishware to sequential wash and rinse cycles inside a closed washing chamber. Spray nozzles inside the chamber typically provide direct streams of wash liquor onto the dishware. The force exerted by these streams often cannot match that delivered during hand dishwashing and so consequentially in particular for machine dishwashing there is a need for effective detergent compositions. As mentioned, correctly so, there is an ongoing need to reduce the environmental impact of operating machine dishwashers using machine dish wash detergents. As such the process of the invention achieves this by providing more effective use of low concentrations of phosphonate and polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers while avoiding more than 1 gram per wash of the not-readily biodegradable ingredients in the waste-water stream. Preferably the amount of the not-readily biodegradable ingredients in the waste-water stream is at most 0.8, more preferably at most 0.7 gram, even more preferably at most 0.5 gram per wash.
The preferred amount of detergent composition added at step b) (e.g. in the dishwasher detergent cup) is from 7 to 30 grams, more preferably from 10 to 25 grams and even more preferably from 12 to 20 grams.
It is advantageous that the running of the machine is done at a maximum temperature of 60 degrees Celsius, to reduce energy expenditure. The detergent composition of the invention and the process of the invention provide good cleaning in these conditions.
In a preferable embodiment the process of washing dishware in a machine dishwasher, comprises the following steps:
In a third aspect, the invention also relates to the use of polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers and phosphonate, in a weight ratio of the polycarboxylate : phosphonate of: 1.3:1 to 5:1, preferably of from 1.4:1 to 4:1, more preferably from 1.5:1 to 3:1, even more preferably 1.6:1 to 2.4:1, for enhancing the cleaning of detergent compositions in machine dishwashers, wherein the detergent composition preferably meets the technical criteria as set out in the EU Commission Decision 2017/2016 ‘establishing the EU Ecolabel criteria for dishwasher detergents.’
It has been surprisingly found that using polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers and phosphonate, in a weight ratio of polycarboxylate comprising acrylic acid monomers to phosphonate in the range of from 1.3:1 to 5:1, provides an unexpected shine effect, in detergent compositions used in machine dishwashers.
The following powder compositions were prepared, as shown in Table 1:
1Sokalan PA25CL
2Acusol 588-G
3modified fatty alcohol polyglycol ether
4Balance: does not include any not-readily biodegradable compounds or excluded compounds as described in the invention.
Stained cutlery and tableware (plastic, metal, glass and earthenware) were washed in a Dishwasher (Miele GSL, Programme 50° C.) with 10 g of the compositions of Example 1 via the dispenser drawer at the start of the wash. The effectiveness of washing the glasses with these compositions after 1 wash cycle and after 6 wash cycles were evaluated by an expert panel and the mean score is reported. Spotting is the result of ineffective washing leaving residual spots of material on the glassware. Filming is the appearance of an evenly distributed film of precipitate on the glassware. The overall aesthetics was a subjective measure of the overall technical cleaning performance. For all evaluations, the higher the number, the better the performance.
1 Sokalan PA25CL
2 ACUSOL 588
3 Mirapol Surf S 480 PF
4 Sokalan CP50
Stained glassware were washed in a Dishwasher (Miele GSL, Programme 50° C.) with 18 g of the compositions Table 4 added via the dispenser drawer of the machine. The effectiveness of washing the glasses with these compositions after 30 washing cycles were evaluated by an expert panel and the ranked in appearance from 1 to 3. A value of 1 denotes the glassware with least spotting, least filming and best overall aesthetics, a value of 3 denotes the glassware with the most spotting, most filming and worst overall aesthetics.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160127.5 | Feb 2020 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2021/053489 | 2/12/2021 | WO |
