Disintegrable and conformable metallic seal, and method of making the same

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10612659
  • Patent Number
    10,612,659
  • Date Filed
    Friday, January 20, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 7, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A seal includes a metal composite that has a cellular nanomatrix that includes a metallic nanomatrix material, a metal matrix disposed in the cellular nanomatrix, and a disintegration agent; an inner sealing surface; and an outer sealing surface disposed radially from the inner sealing surface. The seal can be prepared by combining a metal matrix powder, a disintegration agent, and metal nanomatrix material to form a composition; compacting the composition to form a compacted composition; sintering the compacted composition; and pressing the sintered composition to form the seal.
Description
BACKGROUND

Downhole constructions including oil and natural gas wells, CO2 sequestration boreholes, etc. often utilize borehole components or tools that, due to their function, are only required to have limited service lives that are considerably less than the service life of the well. After a component or tool service function is complete, it must be removed or disposed of in order to recover the original size of the fluid pathway for use, including hydrocarbon production, CO2 capture or sequestration, etc. Disposal of components or tools can be accomplished by milling or drilling the component or tool out of the borehole, which is generally a time consuming and expensive operation. The industry is always receptive to new systems, materials, and methods that eliminate removal of a component or tool from a borehole without such milling and drilling operations.


BRIEF DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein is a seal comprising: a metal composite including: a cellular nanomatrix comprising a metallic nanomatrix material; a metal matrix disposed in the cellular nanomatrix; and a disintegration agent; a first sealing surface; and a second sealing surface opposingly disposed from the first sealing surface.


Further disclosed is a process for preparing a seal that comprises combining a metal matrix powder, a disintegration agent, and metal nanomatrix material to form a composition; compacting the composition to form a compacted composition; sintering the compacted composition; and pressing the sintered composition to form the seal.


Also disclosed is a method for temporarily sealing a downhole element, the method comprising: applying pressure to deform a seal (as above recited); conforming the seal to a space to form a temporary seal; and contacting the temporary seal with a downhole fluid to disintegrate the temporary seal.


Additionally disclosed is a disintegration agent that comprises a metal, fatty acid, ceramic particle, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing disposed among a controlled electrolytic material, wherein the disintegration agent changes the disintegration rate of the controlled electrolytic material.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following descriptions should not be considered limiting in any way. With reference to the accompanying drawings, like elements are numbered alike:



FIG. 1 depicts a cross sectional view of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system;



FIG. 2 depicts a cross sectional view of a disintegrable metal composite;



FIG. 3 is a photomicrograph of an exemplary embodiment of a disintegrable metal composite as disclosed herein;



FIG. 4 depicts a cross sectional view of a composition used to make the disintegrable metal composite shown in FIG. 2;



FIG. 5A is a photomicrograph of a pure metal without a cellular nanomatrix;



FIG. 5B is a photomicrograph of a disintegrable metal composite with a metal matrix and cellular nanomatrix;



FIG. 6 is a graph of mass loss versus time for various disintegrable metal composites that include a cellular nanomatrix indicating selectively tailorable disintegration rates;



FIG. 7A is an electron photomicrograph of a fracture surface of a compact formed from a pure Mg powder;



FIG. 7B is an electron photomicrograph of a fracture surface of an exemplary embodiment of a disintegrable metal composite with a cellular nanomatrix as described herein;



FIG. 8 is a graph of the compressive strength of a metal composite with a cellular nanomatrix versus weight percentage of a constituent (Al2O3) of the cellular nanomatrix;



FIG. 9A depicts a cross sectional view of an embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system in a borehole;



FIG. 9B depicts a cross sectional view of the system of FIG. 9A in a set position;



FIG. 10 depicts a cross sectional view of a disintegrable frustoconical member;



FIG. 11 depicts a cross sectional view of a disintegrable bottom sub;



FIGS. 12A, 12B, and 12C respectively depict a perspective view, cross sectional view, and a top view of a disintegrable sleeve;



FIGS. 13A and 13B respectively depict a perspective view and cross sectional view of a disintegrable seal;



FIG. 14 depicts a cross sectional view of another embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system;



FIG. 15 depicts a cross sectional view of the disintegrable tubular anchoring system of FIG. 14 in a set position;



FIG. 16 depicts a cross sectional view of another embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system;



FIG. 17 depicts a cross sectional view of another embodiment of a disintegrable seal with an elastomer backup ring in a disintegrable tubular anchoring system; and



FIGS. 18A and 18B respectively depict a cross sectional and perspective views of another embodiment of a disintegrable seal.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A detailed description of one or more embodiments of the disclosed apparatus and method are presented herein by way of exemplification and not limitation with reference to the Figures.


The inventors have discovered that a high strength, high ductility yet fully disintegrable tubular anchoring system can be made from materials that selectively and controllably disintegrate in response to contact with certain downhole fluids or in response to changed conditions. Such a disintegrable system includes components that are selectively corrodible and have selectively tailorable disintegration rates and selectively tailorable material properties. Additionally, the disintegrable system has components that have varying compression and tensile strengths and that include a seal (to form, e.g., a conformable metal-to-metal seal), cone, deformable sleeve (or slips), and bottom sub. As used herein, “disintegrable” refers to a material or component that is consumable, corrodible, degradable, dissolvable, weakenable, or otherwise removable. It is to be understood that use herein of the term “disintegrate,” or any of its forms (e.g., “disintegration”), incorporates the stated meaning.


An embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system is show in FIG. 1. The disintegrable tubular anchoring system 110 includes a seal 112, frustoconical member 114, a sleeve 116 (shown herein as a slip ring), and a bottom sub 118. The system 110 is configured such that longitudinal movement of the frustoconical member 114 relative to the sleeve 116 and relative to the seal 112 causes the sleeve 116 and seal 112 respectively to be radially altered. Although in this embodiment the radial alterations are in radially outward directions, in alternate embodiments the radial alterations could be in other directions such as radially inward. Additionally, a longitudinal dimension D1 and thickness T1 of a wall portion of the seal 112 can be altered upon application of a compressive force thereto. The seal 112, frustoconical member 114, sleeve 116, and bottom sub 118 (i.e., components of the system 110) are disintegrable and contain a metal composite. The metal composite includes a metal matrix disposed in a cellular nanomatrix and a disintegration agent.


In an embodiment, the disintegration agent is disposed in the metal matrix. In another embodiment, the disintegration agent is disposed external to the metal matrix. In yet another embodiment, the disintegration agent is disposed in the metal matrix as well as external to the metal matrix. The metal composite also includes the cellular nanomatrix that comprises a metallic nanomatrix material. The disintegration agent can be disposed in the cellular nanomatrix among the metallic nanomatrix material. An exemplary metal composite and method used to make the metal composite are disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/633,682, 12/633,688, 13/220,832, 13/220,822, and 13/358,307, the disclosure of each of which patent application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.


The metal composite is, for example, a powder compact as shown in FIG. 2. The metal composite 200 includes a cellular nanomatrix 216 comprising a nanomatrix material 220 and a metal matrix 214 (e.g., a plurality of dispersed particles) comprising a particle core material 218 dispersed in the cellular nanomatrix 216. The particle core material 218 comprises a nanostructured material. Such a metal composite having the cellular nanomatrix with metal matrix disposed therein is referred to as controlled electrolytic material.


With reference to FIGS. 2 and 4, metal matrix 214 can include any suitable metallic particle core material 218 that includes nanostructure as described herein. In an exemplary embodiment, the metal matrix 214 is formed from particle cores 14 (FIG. 4) and can include an element such as aluminum, iron, magnesium, manganese, zinc, or a combination thereof, as the nanostructured particle core material 218. More particularly, in an exemplary embodiment, the metal matrix 214 and particle core material 218 can include various Al or Mg alloys as the nanostructured particle core material 218, including various precipitation hardenable alloys Al or Mg alloys. In some embodiments, the particle core material 218 includes magnesium and aluminum where the aluminum is present in an amount of about 1 weight percent (wt %) to about 15 wt %, specifically about 1 wt % to about 10 wt %, and more specifically about 1 wt % to about 5 wt %, based on the weight of the metal matrix, the balance of the weight being magnesium.


In an additional embodiment, precipitation hardenable Al or Mg alloys are particularly useful because they can strengthen the metal matrix 214 through both nanostructuring and precipitation hardening through the incorporation of particle precipitates as described herein. The metal matrix 214 and particle core material 218 also can include a rare earth element, or a combination of rare earth elements. Exemplary rare earth elements include Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, or Er. A combination comprising at least one of the foregoing rare earth elements can be used. Where present, the rare earth element can be present in an amount of about 5 wt % or less, and specifically about 2 wt % or less, based on the weight of the metal composite.


The metal matrix 214 and particle core material 218 also can include a nanostructured material 215. In an exemplary embodiment, the nanostructured material 215 is a material having a grain size (e.g., a subgrain or crystallite size) that is less than about 200 nanometers (nm), specifically about 10 nm to about 200 nm, and more specifically an average grain size less than about 100 nm. The nanostructure of the metal matrix 214 can include high angle boundaries 227, which are usually used to define the grain size, or low angle boundaries 229 that may occur as substructure within a particular grain, which are sometimes used to define a crystallite size, or a combination thereof. It will be appreciated that the nanocellular matrix 216 and grain structure (nanostructured material 215 including grain boundaries 227 and 229) of the metal matrix 214 are distinct features of the metal composite 200. Particularly, nanocellular matrix 216 is not part of a crystalline or amorphous portion of the metal matrix 214.


The disintegration agent is included in the metal composite 200 to control the disintegration rate of the metal composite 200. The disintegration agent can be disposed in the metal matrix 214, the cellular nanomatrix 216, or a combination thereof. According to an embodiment, the disintegration agent includes a metal, fatty acid, ceramic particle, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing, the disintegration agent being disposed among the controlled electrolytic material to change the disintegration rate of the controlled electrolytic material. In one embodiment, the disintegration agent is disposed in the cellular nanomatrix external to the metal matrix. In a non-limiting embodiment, the disintegration agent increases the disintegration rate of the metal composite 200. In another embodiment, the disintegration agent decreases the disintegration rate of the metal composite 200. The disintegration agent can be a metal including cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, tungsten, zinc, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. In a further embodiment, the disintegration agent is the fatty acid, e.g., fatty acids having 6 to 40 carbon atoms. Exemplary fatty acids include oleic acid, stearic acid, lauric acid, hyroxystearic acid, behenic acid, arachidonic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, recinoleic acid, palmitic acid, montanic acid, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. In yet another embodiment, the disintegration agent is ceramic particles such as boron nitride, tungsten carbide, tantalum carbide, titanium carbide, niobium carbide, zirconium carbide, boron carbide, hafnium carbide, silicon carbide, niobium boron carbide, aluminum nitride, titanium nitride, zirconium nitride, tantalum nitride, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. Additionally, the ceramic particle can be one of the ceramic materials discussed below with regard to the strengthening agent. Such ceramic particles have a size of 5 μm or less, specifically 2 μm or less, and more specifically 1 μm or less. The disintegration agent can be present in an amount effective to cause disintegration of the metal composite 200 at a desired disintegration rate, specifically about 0.25 wt % to about 15 wt %, specifically about 0.25 wt % to about 10 wt %, specifically about 0.25 wt % to about 1 wt %, based on the weight of the metal composite.


In an exemplary embodiment, the cellular nanomatrix 216 includes aluminum, cobalt, copper, iron, magnesium, nickel, silicon, tungsten, zinc, an oxide thereof, a nitride thereof, a carbide thereof, an intermetallic compound thereof, a cermet thereof, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. The metal matrix can be present in an amount from about 50 wt % to about 95 wt %, specifically about 60 wt % to about 95 wt %, and more specifically about 70 wt % to about 95 wt %, based on the weight of the seal. Further, the amount of the metal nanomatrix material is about 10 wt % to about 50 wt %, specifically about 20 wt % to about 50 wt %, and more specifically about 30 wt % to about 50 wt %, based on the weight of the seal.


In another embodiment, the metal composite includes a second particle. As illustrated generally in FIGS. 2 and 4, the metal composite 200 can be formed using a coated metallic powder 10 and an additional or second powder 30, i.e., both powders 10 and 30 can have substantially the same particulate structure without having identical chemical compounds. The use of an additional powder 30 provides a metal composite 200 that also includes a plurality of dispersed second particles 234, as described herein, that are dispersed within the cellular nanomatrix 216 and are also dispersed with respect to the metal matrix 214. Thus, the dispersed second particles 234 are derived from second powder particles 32 disposed in the powder 10, 30. In an exemplary embodiment, the dispersed second particles 234 include Ni, Fe, Cu, Co, W, Al, Zn, Mn, Si, an oxide thereof, nitride thereof, carbide thereof, intermetallic compound thereof, cermet thereof, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.


Referring again to FIG. 2, the metal matrix 214 and particle core material 218 also can include an additive particle 222. The additive particle 222 provides a dispersion strengthening mechanism to the metal matrix 214 and provides an obstacle to, or serves to restrict, the movement of dislocations within individual particles of the metal matrix 214. Additionally, the additive particle 222 can be disposed in the cellular nanomatrix 216 to strengthen the metal composite 200. The additive particle 222 can have any suitable size and, in an exemplary embodiment, can have an average particle size of about 10 nm to about 1 micron, and specifically about 50 nm to about 200 nm. Here, size refers to the largest linear dimension of the additive particle. The additive particle 222 can include any suitable form of particle, including an embedded particle 224, a precipitate particle 226, or a dispersoid particle 228. Embedded particle 224 can include any suitable embedded particle, including various hard particles. The embedded particle can include various metal, carbon, metal oxide, metal nitride, metal carbide, intermetallic compound, cermet particle, or a combination thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, hard particles can include Ni, Fe, Cu, Co, W, Al, Zn, Mn, Si, an oxide thereof, nitride thereof, carbide thereof, intermetallic compound thereof, cermet thereof, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. The additive particle can be present in an amount of about 0.5 wt % to about 25 wt %, specifically about 0.5 wt % to about 20 wt %, and more specifically about 0.5 wt % to about 10 wt %, based on the weight of the metal composite.


In metal composite 200, the metal matrix 214 dispersed throughout the cellular nanomatrix 216 can have an equiaxed structure in a substantially continuous cellular nanomatrix 216 or can be substantially elongated along an axis so that individual particles of the metal matrix 214 are oblately or prolately shaped, for example. In the case where the metal matrix 214 has substantially elongated particles, the metal matrix 214 and the cellular nanomatrix 216 may be continuous or discontinuous. The size of the particles that make up the metal matrix 214 can be from about 50 nm to about 800 μm, specifically about 500 nm to about 600 μm, and more specifically about 1 μm to about 500 μm. The particle size of can be monodisperse or polydisperse, and the particle size distribution can be unimodal or bimodal. Size here refers to the largest linear dimension of a particle.


Referring to FIG. 3 a photomicrograph of an exemplary embodiment of a metal composite is shown. The metal composite 300 has a metal matrix 214 that includes particles having a particle core material 218. Additionally, each particle of the metal matrix 214 is disposed in a cellular nanomatrix 216. Here, the cellular nanomatrix 216 is shown as a white network that substantially surrounds the component particles of the metal matrix 214.


According to an embodiment, the metal composite is formed from a combination of, for example, powder constituents. As illustrated in FIG. 4, a powder 10 includes powder particles 12 that have a particle core 14 with a core material 18 and metallic coating layer 16 with coating material 20. These powder constituents can be selected and configured for compaction and sintering to provide the metal composite 200 that is lightweight (i.e., having a relatively low density), high-strength, and selectably and controllably removable, e.g., by disintegration, from a borehole in response to a change in a borehole property, including being selectably and controllably disintegrable (e.g., by having a selectively tailorable disintegration rate curve) in an appropriate borehole fluid, including various borehole fluids as disclosed herein.


The nanostructure can be formed in the particle core 14 used to form metal matrix 214 by any suitable method, including a deformation-induced nanostructure such as can be provided by ball milling a powder to provide particle cores 14, and more particularly by cryomilling (e.g., ball milling in ball milling media at a cryogenic temperature or in a cryogenic fluid, such as liquid nitrogen) a powder to provide the particle cores 14 used to form the metal matrix 214. The particle cores 14 may be formed as a nanostructured material 215 by any suitable method, such as, for example, by milling or cryomilling of prealloyed powder particles of the materials described herein. The particle cores 14 may also be formed by mechanical alloying of pure metal powders of the desired amounts of the various alloy constituents. Mechanical alloying involves ball milling, including cryomilling, of these powder constituents to mechanically enfold and intermix the constituents and form particle cores 14. In addition to the creation of nanostructure as described above, ball milling, including cryomilling, can contribute to solid solution strengthening of the particle core 14 and core material 18, which in turn can contribute to solid solution strengthening of the metal matrix 214 and particle core material 218. The solid solution strengthening can result from the ability to mechanically intermix a higher concentration of interstitial or substitutional solute atoms in the solid solution than is possible in accordance with the particular alloy constituent phase equilibria, thereby providing an obstacle to, or serving to restrict, the movement of dislocations within the particle, which in turn provides a strengthening mechanism in the particle core 14 and the metal matrix 214. The particle core 14 can also be formed with a nanostructure (grain boundaries 227, 229) by methods including inert gas condensation, chemical vapor condensation, pulse electron deposition, plasma synthesis, crystallization of amorphous solids, electrodeposition, and severe plastic deformation, for example. The nanostructure also can include a high dislocation density, such as, for example, a dislocation density between about 1017 m−2 and about 1018 M−2, which can be two to three orders of magnitude higher than similar alloy materials deformed by traditional methods, such as cold rolling.


The substantially-continuous cellular nanomatrix 216 (see FIG. 3) and nanomatrix material 220 formed from metallic coating layers 16 by the compaction and sintering of the plurality of metallic coating layers 16 with the plurality of powder particles 12, such as by cold isostatic pressing (CIP), hot isostatic pressing (HIP), or dynamic forging. The chemical composition of nanomatrix material 220 may be different than that of coating material 20 due to diffusion effects associated with the sintering. The metal composite 200 also includes a plurality of particles that make up the metal matrix 214 that comprises the particle core material 218. The metal matrix 214 and particle core material 218 correspond to and are formed from the plurality of particle cores 14 and core material 18 of the plurality of powder particles 12 as the metallic coating layers 16 are sintered together to form the cellular nanomatrix 216. The chemical composition of particle core material 218 may also be different than that of core material 18 due to diffusion effects associated with sintering.


As used herein, the term cellular nanomatrix 216 does not connote the major constituent of the powder compact, but rather refers to the minority constituent or constituents, whether by weight or by volume. This is distinguished from most matrix composite materials where the matrix comprises the majority constituent by weight or volume. The use of the term substantially continuous, cellular nanomatrix is intended to describe the extensive, regular, continuous and interconnected nature of the distribution of nanomatrix material 220 within the metal composite 200. As used herein, “substantially continuous” describes the extension of the nanomatrix material 220 throughout the metal composite 200 such that it extends between and envelopes substantially all of the metal matrix 214. Substantially continuous is used to indicate that complete continuity and regular order of the cellular nanomatrix 220 around individual particles of the metal matrix 214 are not required. For example, defects in the coating layer 16 over particle core 14 on some powder particles 12 may cause bridging of the particle cores 14 during sintering of the metal composite 200, thereby causing localized discontinuities to result within the cellular nanomatrix 216, even though in the other portions of the powder compact the cellular nanomatrix 216 is substantially continuous and exhibits the structure described herein. In contrast, in the case of substantially elongated particles of the metal matrix 214 (i.e., non-equiaxed shapes), such as those formed by extrusion, “substantially discontinuous” is used to indicate that incomplete continuity and disruption (e.g., cracking or separation) of the nanomatrix around each particle of the metal matrix 214, such as may occur in a predetermined extrusion direction. As used herein, “cellular” is used to indicate that the nanomatrix defines a network of generally repeating, interconnected, compartments or cells of nanomatrix material 220 that encompass and also interconnect the metal matrix 214. As used herein, “nanomatrix” is used to describe the size or scale of the matrix, particularly the thickness of the matrix between adjacent particles of the metal matrix 214. The metallic coating layers that are sintered together to form the nanomatrix are themselves nanoscale thickness coating layers. Since the cellular nanomatrix 216 at most locations, other than the intersection of more than two particles of the metal matrix 214, generally comprises the interdiffusion and bonding of two coating layers 16 from adjacent powder particles 12 having nanoscale thicknesses, the cellular nanomatrix 216 formed also has a nanoscale thickness (e.g., approximately two times the coating layer thickness as described herein) and is thus described as a nanomatrix. Further, the use of the term metal matrix 214 does not connote the minor constituent of metal composite 200, but rather refers to the majority constituent or constituents, whether by weight or by volume. The use of the term metal matrix is intended to convey the discontinuous and discrete distribution of particle core material 218 within metal composite 200.


Embedded particle 224 can be embedded by any suitable method, including, for example, by ball milling or cryomilling hard particles together with the particle core material 18. A precipitate particle 226 can include any particle that can be precipitated within the metal matrix 214, including precipitate particles 226 consistent with the phase equilibria of constituents of the materials, particularly metal alloys, of interest and their relative amounts (e.g., a precipitation hardenable alloy), and including those that can be precipitated due to non-equilibrium conditions, such as may occur when an alloy constituent that has been forced into a solid solution of the alloy in an amount above its phase equilibrium limit, as is known to occur during mechanical alloying, is heated sufficiently to activate diffusion mechanisms that enable precipitation. Dispersoid particles 228 can include nanoscale particles or clusters of elements resulting from the manufacture of the particle cores 14, such as those associated with ball milling, including constituents of the milling media (e.g., balls) or the milling fluid (e.g., liquid nitrogen) or the surfaces of the particle cores 14 themselves (e.g., metallic oxides or nitrides). Dispersoid particles 228 can include an element such as, for example, Fe, Ni, Cr, Mn, N, O, C, H, and the like. The additive particles 222 can be disposed anywhere in conjunction with particle cores 14 and the metal matrix 214. In an exemplary embodiment, additive particles 222 can be disposed within or on the surface of metal matrix 214 as illustrated in FIG. 2. In another exemplary embodiment, a plurality of additive particles 222 are disposed on the surface of the metal matrix 214 and also can be disposed in the cellular nanomatrix 216 as illustrated in FIG. 2.


Similarly, dispersed second particles 234 may be formed from coated or uncoated second powder particles 32 such as by dispersing the second powder particles 32 with the powder particles 12. In an exemplary embodiment, coated second powder particles 32 may be coated with a coating layer 36 that is the same as coating layer 16 of powder particles 12, such that coating layers 36 also contribute to the nanomatrix 216. In another exemplary embodiment, the second powder particles 232 may be uncoated such that dispersed second particles 234 are embedded within nanomatrix 216. The powder 10 and additional powder 30 may be mixed to form a homogeneous dispersion of dispersed particles 214 and dispersed second particles 234 or to form a non-homogeneous dispersion of these particles. The dispersed second particles 234 may be formed from any suitable additional powder 30 that is different from powder 10, either due to a compositional difference in the particle core 34, or coating layer 36, or both of them, and may include any of the materials disclosed herein for use as second powder 30 that are different from the powder 10 that is selected to form powder compact 200.


In an embodiment, the metal composite optionally includes a strengthening agent. The strengthening agent increases the material strength of the metal composite. Exemplary strengthening agents include a ceramic, polymer, metal, nanoparticles, cermet, and the like. In particular, the strengthening agent can be silica, glass fiber, carbon fiber, carbon black, carbon nanotubes, borides, oxides, carbides, nitrides, silicides, borides, phosphides, sulfides, cobalt, nickel, iron, tungsten, molybdenum, tantalum, titanium, chromium, niobium, boron, zirconium, vanadium, silicon, palladium, hafnium, aluminum, copper, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. According to an embodiment, a ceramic and metal is combined to form a cermet, e.g., tungsten carbide, cobalt nitride, and the like. Exemplary strengthening agents particularly include magnesia, mullite, thoria, beryllia, urania, spinels, zirconium oxide, bismuth oxide, aluminum oxide, magnesium oxide, silica, barium titanate, cordierite, boron nitride, tungsten carbide, tantalum carbide, titanium carbide, niobium carbide, zirconium carbide, boron carbide, hafnium carbide, silicon carbide, niobium boron carbide, aluminum nitride, titanium nitride, zirconium nitride, tantalum nitride, hafnium nitride, niobium nitride, boron nitride, silicon nitride, titanium boride, chromium boride, zirconium boride, tantalum boride, molybdenum boride, tungsten boride, cerium sulfide, titanium sulfide, magnesium sulfide, zirconium sulfide, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. Non-limiting examples of strengthening agent polymers include polyurethanes, polyimides, polycarbonates, and the like.


In one embodiment, the strengthening agent is a particle with size of about 100 microns or less, specifically about 10 microns or less, and more specifically 500 nm or less. In another embodiment, a fibrous strengthening agent can be combined with a particulate strengthening agent. It is believed that incorporation of the strengthening agent can increase the strength and fracture toughness of the metal composite. Without wishing to be bound by theory, finer (i.e., smaller) sized particles can produce a stronger metal composite as compared with larger sized particles. Moreover, the shape of strengthening agent can vary and includes fiber, sphere, rod, tube, and the like. The strengthening agent can be present in an amount of 0.01 weight percent (wt %) to 20 wt %, specifically 0.01 wt % to 10 wt %, and more specifically 0.01 wt % to 5 wt %.


In a process for preparing a component of a disintegrable anchoring system (e.g., a seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, bottom sub, and the like) containing a metal composite, the process includes combining a metal matrix powder, disintegration agent, metal nanomatrix material, and optionally a strengthening agent to form a composition; compacting the composition to form a compacted composition; sintering the compacted composition; and pressing the sintered composition to form the component of the disintegrable system. The members of the composition can be mixed, milled, blended, and the like to form the powder 10 as shown in FIG. 4 for example. It should be appreciated that the metal nanomatrix material is a coating material disposed on the metal matrix powder that, when compacted and sintered, forms the cellular nanomatrix. A compact can be formed by pressing (i.e., compacting) the composition at a pressure to form a green compact. The green compact can be subsequently pressed under a pressure of about 15,000 psi to about 100,000 psi, specifically about 20,000 psi to about 80,000 psi, and more specifically about 30,000 psi to about 70,000 psi, at a temperature of about 250° C. to about 600° C., and specifically about 300° C. to about 450° C., to form the powder compact. Pressing to form the powder compact can include compression in a mold. The powder compact can be further machined to shape the powder compact to a useful shape. Alternatively, the powder compact can be pressed into the useful shape. Machining can include cutting, sawing, ablating, milling, facing, lathing, boring, and the like using, for example, a mill, table saw, lathe, router, electric discharge machine, and the like.


The metal matrix 200 can have any desired shape or size, including that of a cylindrical billet, bar, sheet, toroid, or other form that may be machined, formed or otherwise used to form useful articles of manufacture, including various wellbore tools and components. Pressing is used to form a component of the disintegrable anchoring system (e.g., seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, bottom sub, and the like) from the sintering and pressing processes used to form the metal composite 200 by deforming the powder particles 12, including particle cores 14 and coating layers 16, to provide the full density and desired macroscopic shape and size of the metal composite 200 as well as its microstructure. The morphology (e.g. equiaxed or substantially elongated) of the individual particles of the metal matrix 214 and cellular nanomatrix 216 of particle layers results from sintering and deformation of the powder particles 12 as they are compacted and interdiffuse and deform to fill the interparticle spaces of the metal matrix 214 (FIG. 2). The sintering temperatures and pressures can be selected to ensure that the density of the metal composite 200 achieves substantially full theoretical density.


The metal composite has beneficial properties for use in, for example a downhole environment. In an embodiment, a component of the disintegrable anchoring system made of the metal composite has an initial shape that can be run downhole and, in the case of the seal and sleeve, can be subsequently deformed under pressure. The metal composite is strong and ductile with a percent elongation of about 0.1% to about 75%, specifically about 0.1% to about 50%, and more specifically about 0.1% to about 25%, based on the original size of the component of the disintegrable anchoring system. The metal composite has a yield strength of about 15 kilopounds per square inch (ksi) to about 50 ksi, and specifically about 15 ksi to about 45 ksi. The compressive strength of the metal composite is from about 30 ksi to about 100 ksi, and specifically about 40 ksi to about 80 ksi. The components of the disintegrable anchoring system can have the same or different material properties, such as percent elongation, compressive strength, tensile strength, and the like.


Unlike elastomeric materials, the components of the disintegrable anchoring system herein that include the metal composite have a temperature rating up to about 1200° F., specifically up to about 1000° F., and more specifically about 800° F. The disintegrable anchoring system is temporary in that the system is selectively and tailorably disintegrable in response to contact with a downhole fluid or change in condition (e.g., pH, temperature, pressure, time, and the like). Moreover, the components of the disintegrable anchoring system can have the same or different disintegration rates or reactivities with the downhole fluid. Exemplary downhole fluids include brine, mineral acid, organic acid, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. The brine can be, for example, seawater, produced water, completion brine, or a combination thereof. The properties of the brine can depend on the identity and components of the brine. Seawater, as an example, contains numerous constituents such as sulfate, bromine, and trace metals, beyond typical halide-containing salts. On the other hand, produced water can be water extracted from a production reservoir (e.g., hydrocarbon reservoir), produced from the ground. Produced water is also referred to as reservoir brine and often contains many components such as barium, strontium, and heavy metals. In addition to the naturally occurring brines (seawater and produced water), completion brine can be synthesized from fresh water by addition of various salts such as KCl, NaCl, ZnCl2, MgCl2, or CaCl2 to increase the density of the brine, such as 10.6 pounds per gallon of CaCl2 brine. Completion brines typically provide a hydrostatic pressure optimized to counter the reservoir pressures downhole. The above brines can be modified to include an additional salt. In an embodiment, the additional salt included in the brine is NaCl, KCl, NaBr, MgCl2, CaCl2, CaBr2, ZnBr2, NH4Cl, sodium formate, cesium formate, and the like. The salt can be present in the brine in an amount from about 0.5 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, specifically about 1 wt. % to about 40 wt. %, and more specifically about 1 wt. % to about 25 wt. %, based on the weight of the composition.


In another embodiment, the downhole fluid is a mineral acid that can include hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, boric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrobromic acid, perchloric acid, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. In yet another embodiment, the downhole fluid is an organic acid that can include a carboxylic acid, sulfonic acid, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. Exemplary carboxylic acids include formic acid, acetic acid, chloroacetic acid, dichloroacetic acid, trichloroacetic acid, trifluoroacetic acid, proprionic acid, butyric acid, oxalic acid, benzoic acid, phthalic acid (including ortho-, meta- and para-isomers), and the like. Exemplary sulfonic acids include alkyl sulfonic acid or aryl sulfonic acid. Alkyl sulfonic acids include, e.g., methane sulfonic acid. Aryl sulfonic acids include, e.g., benzene sulfonic acid or toluene sulfonic acid. In one embodiment, the alkyl group may be branched or unbranched and may contain from one to about 20 carbon atoms and can be substituted or unsubstituted. The aryl group can be alkyl-substituted, i.e., may be an alkylaryl group, or may be attached to the sulfonic acid moiety via an alkylene group (i.e., an arylalkyl group). In an embodiment, the aryl group may be substituted with a heteroatom. The aryl group can have from about 3 carbon atoms to about 20 carbon atoms and include a polycyclic ring structure.


The disintegration rate (also referred to as dissolution rate) of the metal composite is about 1 milligram per square centimeter per hour (mg/cm2/hr) to about 10,000 mg/cm2/hr, specifically about 25 mg/cm2/hr to about 1000 mg/cm2/hr, and more specifically about 50 mg/cm2/hr to about 500 mg/cm2/hr. The disintegration rate is variable upon the composition and processing conditions used to form the metal composite herein.


Without wishing to be bound by theory, the unexpectedly high disintegration rate of the metal composite herein is due to the microstructure provided by the metal matrix and cellular nanomatrix. As discussed above, such microstructure is provided by using powder metallurgical processing (e.g., compaction and sintering) of coated powders, wherein the coating produces the nanocellular matrix and the powder particles produce the particle core material of the metal matrix. It is believed that the intimate proximity of the cellular nanomatrix to the particle core material of the metal matrix in the metal composite produces galvanic sites for rapid and tailorable disintegration of the metal matrix. Such electrolytic sites are missing in single metals and alloys that lack a cellular nanomatrix. For illustration, FIG. 5A shows a compact 50 formed from magnesium powder. Although the compact 50 exhibits particles 52 surrounded by particle boundaries 54, the particle boundaries constitute physical boundaries between substantially identical material (particles 52). However, FIG. 5B shows an exemplary embodiment of a composite metal 56 (a powder compact) that includes a metal matrix 58 having particle core material 60 disposed in a cellular nanomatrix 62. The composite metal 56 was formed from aluminum oxide coated magnesium particles where, under powder metallurgical processing, the aluminum oxide coating produces the cellular nanomatrix 62, and the magnesium produces the metal matrix 58 having particle core material 60 (of magnesium). Cellular nanomatrix 62 is not just a physical boundary as the particle boundary 54 in FIG. 5A but is also a chemical boundary interposed between neighboring particle core materials 60 of the metal matrix 58. Whereas the particles 52 and particle boundary 54 in compact 50 (FIG. 5A) do not have galvanic sites, metal matrix 58 having particle core material 60 establish a plurality of galvanic sites in conjunction with the cellular nanomatrix 62. The reactivity of the galvanic sites depend on the compounds used in the metal matrix 58 and the cellular nanomatrix 62 as is an outcome of the processing conditions used to the metal matrix and cellular nanomatrix microstructure of the metal composite.


Moreover, the microstructure of the metal composites herein is controllable by selection of powder metallurgical processing conditions and chemical materials used in the powders and coatings. Therefore, the disintegration rate is selectively tailorable as illustrated for metal composites of various compositions in FIG. 6, which shows a graph of mass loss versus time for various metal composites that include a cellular nanomatrix. Specifically, FIG. 6 displays disintegration rate curves for four different metal composites (metal composite A 80, metal composite B 82 metal composite C 84, and metal composite D 86). The slope of each segment of each curve (separated by the black dots in FIG. 6) provides the disintegration rate for particular segments of the curve. Metal composite A 80 has two distinct disintegration rates (802, 806). Metal composite B 82 has three distinct disintegration rates (808, 812, 816). Metal composite C 84 has two distinct disintegration rates (818, 822), and metal composite D 86 has four distinct disintegration rates (824, 828, 832, and 836). At a time represented by points 804, 810, 814, 820, 826, 830, and 834, the rate of the disintegration of the metal composite (80, 82, 84, 86) changes due to a changed condition (e.g., pH, temperature, time, pressure as discussed above). The rate may increase (e.g., going from rate 818 to rate 822) or decrease (e.g., going from rate 802 to 806) along the same disintegration curve. Moreover, a disintegration rate curve can have more than two rates, more than three rates, more than four rates, etc. based on the microstructure and components of the metallic composite. In this manner, the disintegration rate curve is selectively tailorable and distinguishable from mere metal alloys and pure metals that lack the microstructure (i.e., metal matrix and cellular nanomatrix) of the metal composites described herein.


Not only does the microstructure of the metal composite govern the disintegration rate behavior of the metal composite but also affects the strength of the metal composite. As a consequence, the metal composites herein also have a selectively tailorable material strength yield (and other material properties), in which the material strength yield varies due to the processing conditions and the materials used to produce the metal composite. To illustrate, FIG. 7A shows an electron photomicrograph of a fracture surface of a compact formed from a pure Mg powder, and FIG. 7B shows an electron photomicrograph of a fracture surface of an exemplary embodiment of a metal composite with a cellular nanomatrix as described herein. The microstructural morphology of the substantially continuous, cellular nanomatrix, which can be selected to provide a strengthening phase material, with the metal matrix (having particle core material), provides the metal composites herein with enhanced mechanical properties, including compressive strength and sheer strength, since the resulting morphology of the cellular nanomatrix/metal matrix can be manipulated to provide strengthening through the processes that are akin to traditional strengthening mechanisms, such as grain size reduction, solution hardening through the use of impurity atoms, precipitation or age hardening and strain/work hardening mechanisms. The cellular nanomatrix/metal matrix structure tends to limit dislocation movement by virtue of the numerous particle nanomatrix interfaces, as well as interfaces between discrete layers within the cellular nanomatrix material as described herein. This is exemplified in the fracture behavior of these materials, as illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B. In FIG. 7A, a compact made using uncoated pure Mg powder and subjected to a shear stress sufficient to induce failure demonstrated intergranular fracture. In contrast, in FIG. 7B, a metal composite made using powder particles having pure Mg powder particle cores to form metal matrix and metallic coating layers that includes Al to form the cellular nanomatrix and subjected to a shear stress sufficient to induce failure demonstrated transgranular fracture and a substantially higher fracture stress as described herein. Because these materials have high-strength characteristics, the core material and coating material may be selected to utilize low density materials or other low density materials, such as low-density metals, ceramics, glasses or carbon, that otherwise would not provide the necessary strength characteristics for use in the desired applications, including wellbore tools and components.


To further illustrate the selectively tailorable material properties of the metal composites having a cellular nanomatrix, FIG. 8 shows a graph of the compressive strength of a metal composite with a cellular nanomatrix versus weight percentage of a constituent (Al2O3) of the cellular nanomatrix. FIG. 8 clearly shows the effect of varying the weight percentage (wt %), i.e., thickness, of an alumina coating on the room temperature compressive strength of a metal composite with a cellular nanomatrix formed from coated powder particles that include a multilayer (Al/Al2O3/Al) metallic coating layer on pure Mg particle cores. In this example, optimal strength is achieved at 4 wt % of alumina, which represents an increase of 21% as compared to that of 0 wt % alumina.


Thus, the metal composites herein can be configured to provide a wide range of selectable and controllable corrosion or disintegration behavior from very low corrosion rates to extremely high corrosion rates, particularly corrosion rates that are both lower and higher than those of powder compacts that do not incorporate the cellular nanomatrix, such as a compact formed from pure Mg powder through the same compaction and sintering processes in comparison to those that include pure Mg dispersed particles in the various cellular nanomatrices described herein. These metal composites 200 may also be configured to provide substantially enhanced properties as compared to compacts formed from pure metal (e.g., pure Mg) particles that do not include the nanoscale coatings described herein. Moreover, metal alloys (formed by, e.g., casting from a melt or formed by metallurgically processing a powder) without the cellular nanomatrix also do not have the selectively tailorable material and chemical properties as the metal composites herein.


As mentioned above, the metal composite is used to produce articles that can be used as tools or implements, e.g., in a downhole environment. In a particular embodiment, the article is a seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, or bottom sub. In another embodiment, combinations of the articles are used together as a disintegrable tubular anchoring system.


Referring to FIGS. 9A and 9B, an embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system disclosed herein is illustrated at 510. The sealing system 510 includes a frustoconical member 514 (also referred to as a cone and shown individually in FIG. 10) having a first frustoconical portion 516 and a second frustoconical portion 520 that are tapered in opposing longitudinal directions to one another. A bottom sub 570 (shown individually in FIG. 11) is disposed at an end of the disintegrable system 510. Sleeve 524 (shown individually in FIG. 12) is radially expandable in response to being moved longitudinally against the first frustoconical portion 516. Similarly, a seal 528 (shown individually in FIGS. 13A and 13B) is radially expandable in response to being moved longitudinally against the second frustoconical portion 520. One way of moving the sleeve 524 and the seal 528 relative to the frustoconical portions 516, 520 is to compress longitudinally the complete assembly with a setting tool 558. The seal 528 includes a seat 532 with a surface 536 that is tapered in this embodiment and is receptive to a plug 578 that can sealingly engage the surface 536 of seal 528.


The seat 532 of the seal 528 also includes a collar 544 that is positioned between the seal 528 and the second frustoconical portion 520. The collar 544 has a wall 548 whose thickness is tapered due to a radially inwardly facing frustoconical surface 552 thereon. The varied thickness of the wall 548 allows for thinner portions to deform more easily than thicker portions. This can be beneficial for at least two reasons. First, the thinner walled portion 549 can deform when the collar 544 is moved relative to the second frustoconical portion 520 in order for the seal 528 to expand radially into sealing engagement with a structure 540. Second, the thicker walled portion 550 should resist deformation due to pressure differential thereacross that is created when pressuring up against a plug (e.g., plug 578) seated at the seat 532 during treatment operations, for example. The taper angle of the frustoconical surface 552 may be selected to match a taper angle of the second frustoconical portion 520 thereby to allow the second frustoconical portion 520 to provide radial support to the collar 544 at least in the areas where they are in contact with one another.


The disintegrable tubular anchoring system 510 is configured to set (i.e., anchor) and seal to a structure 540 such as a liner, casing, or closed or open hole in an earth formation borehole, for example, as is employable in hydrocarbon recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration applications. The sealing and anchoring to the structure 540 allows pressure against the plug 578 seated thereat to increase for treatment of the earth formation as is done during fracturing and acid treatment, for example. Additionally, the seat 532 is positioned in the seal 528 such that pressure applied against a plug seated on the seat 532 urges the seal 528 toward the sleeve 524 to thereby increase both sealing engagement of the seal 528 with the structure 540 and the frustoconical member 514 as well as increasing the anchoring engagement of the sleeve 524 with the structure 540.


The sealing system 510 can be configured such that the sleeve 524 is anchored (positionally fixed) to the structure 540 prior to the seal 528 sealingly engaging with the structure 540, or such that the seal 528 is sealingly engaged with the structure 540 prior to the sleeve 524 anchoring to the structure 540. Controlling which of the seal 528 and the sleeve 524 engages with the structure 540 first can be selected through material properties relationships (e.g., relative compressive strength) or dimensional relationships between the components involved in the setting of the seal 528 in comparison to the components involved in the setting of the sleeve 524. Regardless of whether the sleeve 524 or the seal 528 engages the structure 540 first may be set in response to directions of portions of a setting tool that set the disintegrable tubular anchoring system 510. Damage to the seal 528 can be minimized by reducing or eliminating relative movement between the seal 528 and the structure 540 after the seal 528 is engaged with the structure 540. In this embodiment, having the seal 528 engage with the structure 540 prior to having the sleeve 524 engage the structure 540 can achieve this goal.


The surface 536 of the seat 532 is positioned longitudinally upstream (as defined by fluid flow that urges a plug against the seat 532) of the sleeve 524. Additionally, the seat 536 of the seal can be positioned longitudinally upstream of the collar 544 of the seal 528. This relative positioning allows forces generated by pressure against a plug seated against the land 536 further to urge the seal 528 into sealing engagement with the structure 540.


The portion of the collar 544 that deforms conforms to the second frustoconical portion 520 sufficiently to be radially supported thereby, regardless of whether the taper angles match. The second frustoconical portion 520 can have taper angles from about 1° to about 30°, specifically about 2° to about 20° to facilitate radial expansion of the collar 544 and to allow frictional forces between the collar 544 and the second frustoconical portion 520 to maintain positional relationships therebetween after removal of longitudinal forces that caused the movement therebetween. The first frustoconical portion 516 can also have taper angles from about 10° to about 30°, specifically about 14° to about 20° for the same reasons that the second frustoconical portion 520 does. Either or both of the frustoconical surface 552 and the second frustoconical portion 520 can include more than one taper angle as is illustrated herein on the second frustoconical portion 520 where a nose 556 has a larger taper angle than the surface 520 has further from the nose 556. Having multiple taper angles can provide operators with greater control over amounts of radial expansion of the collar 544 (and subsequently the seal 528) per unit of longitudinal movement between the collar 544 and the frustoconical member 514. The taper angles, in addition to other variables, also provide additional control over longitudinal forces needed to move the collar 544 relative to the frustoconical member 514. Such control can allow the disintegrable tubular anchoring system 510 to expand the collar 544 of the seal 528 to set the seal 528 prior to expanding and setting the sleeve 224.


In an embodiment, the setting tool 558 is disposed along the length of the system 510 from the bottom sub 570 to the seal 528. The setting tool 558 can generate the loads needed to cause movement of the frustoconical member 514 relative to the sleeve 524. The setting tool 558 can have a mandrel 560 with a stop 562 attached to one end 564 by a force failing member 566 such as a plurality of shear screws. The stop 562 is disposed to contact the bottom sub 570. A plate 568 disposed to contact the seal 528 guidingly movable along the mandrel 560 (by means not shown herein) in a direction toward the stop 562 at the bottom sub 570 can longitudinally urge the frustoconical member 514 toward the sleeve 524. Loads to fail the force failing member 566 can be set to only occur after the sleeve 524 has been radially altered by the frustoconical member 514 a selected amount. After failure of the force failing member 566, the stop 562 may separate from the mandrel 560, thereby allowing the mandrel 560 and the plate 568 to be retrieved to surface, for example.


According to an embodiment, the surface 572 of the sleeve 524 includes protrusions 574, which may be referred to as teeth, configured to bitingly engage with a wall 576 of the structure 540, within which the disintegrable system 510 is employable, when the surface 572 is in a radially altered (i.e., expanded) configuration. This biting engagement serves to anchor the disintegrable system 510 to the structure 540 to prevent relative movement therebetween. Although the structure 540 disclosed in this embodiment is a tubular, such as a liner or casing in a borehole, it could be an open hole in an earth formation, for example.



FIG. 9B shows the disintegrable system 510 after the setting tool 558 has been removed from the structure 540 subsequent to setting the disintegrable system 510. Here, the protrusions 574 of the sleeve 524 bitingly engage the wall 576 of the structure 540 to anchor the disintegrable system 510 thereto. Additionally, the seal 528 has been radially expanded to contact the wall 576 of the structure 540 on the outer surface of the seal 528 due to compression thereof by the setting tool 558. The seal 528 deforms such that the length of the seal 528 has increased as the thickness 548 has decreased during compression of the seal 528 between the frustoconical member 514 and the wall 576 of structure 540. In this way, the seal 528 forms a metal-to-metal seal against the frustoconical member 514 and a metal-to-metal seal against the wall 576. Alternatively, the seal 528 can deform to complement topographical features of the wall 576 such as voids, pits, protrusions, and the like. Similarly, the ductility and tensile strength of the seal 528 allow the seal 528 to deform to complement topographical features of the frustoconical member 514.


After setting the disintegrable system 510 with the protrusions 574 of the sleeve 514, a plug 578 can be disposed on the surface 536 of seat 532. Once the plug 578 is sealingly engaged with the seat 536, pressure can increase upstream thereof to perform work such as fracturing an earth formation or actuating a downhole tool, for example, when employed in a hydrocarbon recovery application.


In an embodiment, as show in FIG. 9B, the plug 578, e.g., a ball, engages the seat 532 of seal 528. Pressure is applied, for example, hydraulically, to the plug 578 to deform the collar 544 of the seal 528. Deformation of the collar 544 causes the wall material 548 to elongate and sealably engage with the structure 540 (e.g., borehole casing) to form a metal-to-metal seal with the first frustoconical portion 516 of the frustoconical member 514 and to from another metal-to-metal seal with the structure 576. Here, the ductility of the metal composite allows the seal 528 to fill the space between the structure 540 and the frustoconical member 514. A downhole operation can be performed at this time, and the plug 578 subsequently removed after the operation. Removal of the plug 578 from the seat 532 can occur by creating a pressure differential across the plug 578 such that the plug 578 dislodges from the seat 532 and moves away from the seal 528 and frustoconical member 514. Thereafter, the any of the seal 528, frustoconical member 514, sleeve 524, or bottom sub 570 can be disintegrated by contact with a downhole fluid. Alternatively, before the plug 578 is removed from the seat 532, a downhole fluid can contact and disintegrate the seal 528, and the plug 578 then can be removed from any of the remaining components of the disintegrable system 510. Disintegration of the seal 528, frustoconical member 514, sleeve 524, or bottom sub 570 is beneficial at least in part because the flow path of the borehole is restored without mechanically removing the components of the disintegrable system 510 (e.g., by boring or milling) or flushing the debris out of the borehole. It should be appreciated that the disintegration rates of the components of the disintegrable system 510 are independently selectively tailorable as discussed above, and that the seal 528, frustoconical member 514, sleeve 524, or bottom sub 570 have independently selectively tailorable material properties such as yield strength and compressive strength.


According to another embodiment, the disintegrable tubular anchoring system 510 is configured to leave a through bore 580 with an inner radial dimension 582 and outer radial dimension 584 defined by a largest radial dimension of the disintegrable system 510 when set within the structure 540. In an embodiment, the inner radial dimension 582 can be large enough for mandrel 560 of the setting tool 558 to fit through the system 510. The stop 562 of the setting tool 558 can be left in the structure 540 after setting the disintegrable system 510 and removal of the mandrel 560. The stop 562 can be fished out of the structure 540 after disintegrating the system 510 at least to a point where the stop 562 can pass through the inner radial dimension 582. Thus, a component of the disintegrable system 510 can be substantially solid. By incorporation of the through bore 580 in the disintegrable system 510, a fluid can be circulated through the disintegrable system 510 from either the downstream or upstream direction in the structure 540 to cause disintegration of a component (e.g., the sleeve).


In another embodiment, the disintegrable tubular anchoring system 510 is configured with the inner radial dimension 582 that is large in relation to the outer radial dimension 584. According to one embodiment, the inner radial dimension 582 is greater than 50% of the outer radial dimension 584, specifically greater than 60%, and more specifically greater than 70%.


The seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, and bottom sub can have beneficial properties for use in, for example a downhole environment, either in combination or separately. These components are disintegrable and can be part of a completely disintegrable anchoring system herein. Further, the components have mechanical and chemical properties of the metal composite described herein. The components thus beneficially are selectively and tailorably disintegrable in response to contact with a fluid or change in condition (e.g., pH, temperature, pressure, time, and the like). Exemplary fluids include brine, mineral acid, organic acid, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.


A cross sectional view of an embodiment of a frustoconical member is shown in FIG. 10. As described above, the frustoconical member 514 has a first frustoconical portion 516, second frustoconical portion 520, and nose 556. The taper angle of the frustoconical member 514 can vary along the outer surface 584 so that the frustoconical member 514 has various cross sectional shapes including the truncated double cone shape shown. The wall thickness 586 therefore can vary along the length of the frustoconical member 514, and the inner diameter of the frustoconical member 514 can be selected based on a particular application. The frustoconical member 514 can be used in various applications such as in the disintegrable tubular anchoring system herein as well as in any situation in which a strong or disintegrable frustoconical shape is useful. Exemplary applications include a bearing, flare fitting, valve stem, sealing ring, and the like.


A cross sectional view of a bottom sub is shown in FIG. 11. The bottom sub 700 has a first end 702, second end 704, optional thread 706, optional through holes 708, inner diameter 710, and outer diameter 712. In an embodiment, the bottom sub 700 is the terminus of a tool (e.g., disintegrable system 510). In another embodiment, the bottom sub 700 is disposed at an end of a string. In certain embodiment, the bottom sub 700 is used to attach tools to a string. Alternatively, the bottom sub 700 can be used between tools or strings and can be part of a joint or coupling. The bottom sub 700 can be used with a string and an article such as a bridge plug, frac plug, mud motor, packer, whip stock, and the like. In one non-limiting embodiment, the first end 702 provides an interface with, e.g., the frustoconical member 514 and the sleeve 524. The second end 704 engages the stop 562 of the setting tool 558. Thread 706, when present, can be used to secure the bottom sub 700 to an article. In an embodiment, the frustoconical member 514 has a threaded portion that mates with the thread 706. In some embodiments, thread 706 is absent, and the inner diameter 710 can be a straight bore or can have portions thereof that are tapered. The through holes 708 can transmit fluid, e.g., brine, to disintegrate the bottom sub 700 or other components of the disintegrable system 510. The through holes also can be an attachment point for the force failing member 566 used in conjunction with the setting tool 558 or similar device. It is contemplated that the bottom sub 700 can have another cross sectional shape than that shown in FIG. 11. Exemplary shapes include a cone, ellipsoid, toroid, sphere, cylinder, their truncated shapes, asymmetrical shapes, including a combination of the foregoing, and the like. Further, the bottom sub 700 can be a solid item or can have an inner diameter that is at least 10% the size of the outer diameter, specifically at least 50%, and more specifically at least 70%.


A sleeve is shown in a perspective, cross sectional, and top views respectively in FIGS. 12A, 12B, and 12C. The sleeve 524 includes an outer surface 572, protrusions 574 disposed on the outer surface 572, and inner surface 571. The sleeve 524 acts as a slip ring with the protrusions 574 as slips that bitingly engage a surface such as a wall of a casing or open hole as the sleeve 524 radially expands in response to a first portion 573 of the inner surface 571 engaging a mating surface (e.g., first frustoconical portion 516 in FIG. 10). The protrusions 574 can circumferentially surround the entirety of the sleeve 524. Alternatively, the protrusions 574 can be spaced apart, either symmetrically or asymmetrically, as shown in the top view in FIG. 12C. The shape of the sleeve 524 is not limited to that shown in FIG. 12. The sleeve, in addition to being a slip ring in the disintegrable tubular anchoring system illustrated in FIG. 9, can be used to set numerous tools including a packer, bridge plug, or frac plug or can be disposed in any environment where anti-slipping of an article can be accomplished by engaging the protrusions of the sleeve with a mating surface.


Referring to FIGS. 13A and 13B, a seal 400 includes an inner sealing surface 402, outer sealing surface 404, seat 406, and a surface 408 of the seat 406. The surface 408 is configured (e.g., shaped) to accept a member (e.g., a plug) to provide force on the seal 400 in order to deform the seal so that the inner sealing surface 402 and outer sealing surface 404 respectively form metal-to-metal seals with mating surfaces (not shown in FIGS. 13A and 13B). Alternatively, a compressive force is applied to the seal 400 by a frustoconical member and setting tool disposed at opposing ends of the seal 400 as in FIG. 9A. In an embodiment, the seal 400 is useful in a downhole environment as a conformable, deformable, highly ductile, and disintegrable seal. In an embodiment, the seal 400 is a bridge plug, gasket, flapper valve, and the like.


In addition to being selectively corrodible, the seal herein deforms in situ to conform to a space in which it is disposed in response to an applied setting pressure, which is a pressure large enough to expand radially the seal or to decrease the wall thickness of the seal by increasing the length of the seal. Unlike many seals, e.g., an elastomer seal, the seal herein is prepared in a shape that corresponds to a mating surface to be sealed, e.g., a casing, or frustoconical shape of a downhole tool. In an embodiment, the seal is a temporary seal and has an initial shape that can be run downhole and subsequently deformed under pressure to form a metal-to-metal seal that deforms to surfaces that the seal contacts and fills spaces (e.g. voids) in a mating surface. To achieve the sealing properties, the seal has a percent elongation of about 10% to about 75%, specifically about 15% to about 50%, and more specifically about 15% to about 25%, based on the original size of the seal. The seal has a yield strength of about 15 kilopounds per square inch (ksi) to about 50 ksi, and specifically about 15 ksi to about 45 ksi. The compressive strength of the seal is from about 30 ksi to about 100 ksi, and specifically about 40 ksi to about 80 ksi. To deform the seal, a pressure of up to about 10,000 psi, and specifically about 9,000 psi can be applied to the seal.


Unlike elastomeric seals, the seal herein that includes the metal composite has a temperature rating up to about 1200° F., specifically up to about 1000° F., and more specifically up to about 800° F. The seal is temporary in that the seal is selectively and tailorably disintegrable in response to contact with a downhole fluid or change in condition (e.g., pH, temperature, pressure, time, and the like). Exemplary downhole fluids include brine, mineral acid, organic acid, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.


Since the seal interworks with other components, e.g., a frustoconical member, sleeve, or bottom sub in, e.g., the disintegrable tubular anchoring system herein, the properties of each component are selected for the appropriate relative selectively tailorable material and chemical properties. These properties are a characteristic of the metal composite and the processing conditions that form the metal composite, which is used to produce such articles, i.e., the components. Therefore, in an embodiment, the metal composite of a component will differ from that of another component of the disintegrable system. In this way, the components have independent selectively tailorable mechanical and chemical properties.


According to an embodiment, the sleeve and seal deform under a force imparted by the frustoconical member and bottom sub. To achieve this result, the sleeve and seal have a compressive strength that is less than that of the bottom sub or frustoconical member. In another embodiment, the sleeve deforms before, after, or simultaneously as deformation of the seal. It is contemplated that the bottom sub or frustoconical member deforms in certain embodiments. In an embodiment, a component has a different amount of a strengthening agent than another component, for example, where a higher strength component has a greater amount of strengthening agent than does a component of lesser strength. In a specific embodiment, the frustoconical member has a greater amount of strengthening agent than that of the seal. In another embodiment, the frustoconical member has a greater amount of strengthening agent than that of the sleeve. Similarly, the bottom sub can have a greater amount of strengthening agent than either the seal or sleeve. In a particular embodiment, the frustoconical member has a compressive strength that is greater than that of either the seal or sleeve. In a further embodiment, the frustoconical member has a compressive strength that is greater than that of either of the seal or sleeve. In one embodiment, the frustoconical member has a compressive strength of 40 ksi to 100 ksi, specifically 50 ksi to 100 ksi. In another embodiment, the bottom sub has a compressive strength of 40 ksi to 100 ksi, specifically 50 ksi to 100 ksi. In yet another embodiment, the seal has a compressive strength of 30 ksi to 70 ksi, specifically 30 ksi to 60 ksi. In yet another embodiment, the sleeve has a compressive strength of 30 ksi to 80 ksi, specifically 30 ksi to 70 ksi. Thus, under a compressive force either the seal or sleeve will deform before deformation of either the bottom sub or frustoconical member.


Other factors that can affect the relative strength of the components include the type and size of the strengthening agent in each component. In an embodiment, the frustoconical member includes a strengthening of smaller size than a strengthening agent in either of the seal or sleeve. In yet another embodiment, the bottom sub includes a strengthening agent of smaller size than a strengthening agent in either of the seal or sleeve. In one embodiment, the frustoconical member includes a strengthening agent such as a ceramic, metal, cermet, or a combination thereof, wherein the size of the strengthening agent is from 10 nm to 200 μm, specifically 100 nm to 100 μm.


Yet another factor that impacts the relative selectively tailorable material and chemical properties of the components is the constituents of the metal composite, i.e., the metallic nanomatrix of the cellular nanomatrix, the metal matrix disposed in the cellular nanomatrix, or the disintegration agent. The compressive and tensile strengths and disintegration rate are determined by the chemical identity and relative amount of these constituents. Thus, these properties can be regulated by the constituents of the metal composite. According to an embodiment, a component (e.g., seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, or bottom sub) has a metal matrix of the metal composite that includes a pure metal, and another component has a metal matrix that includes an alloy. In another embodiment, the seal has a metal matrix that includes a pure metal, and the frustoconical member has a metal matrix that includes an alloy. In an additional embodiment, the sleeve has a metal matrix that is a pure metal. It is contemplated that a component can be functionally graded in that the metal matrix of the metal composite can contain both a pure metal and an alloy having a gradient in the relative amount of either the pure metal or alloy in the metal matrix as disposed in the component. Therefore, the value of the selectively tailorable properties varies in relation to the position along the component.


In a particular embodiment, the disintegration rate of a component (e.g., seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, or bottom sub) has a greater value than that of another component. Alternatively, each component can have substantially the same disintegration rate. In a further embodiment, the sleeve has a greater disintegration rate than another component, e.g., the frustoconical member. In another embodiment, the amount of disintegration agent of a component (e.g., seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, or bottom sub) is present in an amount greater than that of another component. In another embodiment, the amount of disintegration agent present in the sleeve is greater than another component. In one embodiment, the amount of disintegrating agent in the seal is greater than another component.


Referring to FIGS. 14 and 15, an alternate embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system is illustrated at 1110. The disintegrable system 1110 includes a frustoconical member 1114, a sleeve 1118 having a surface 1122, a seal 1126 having a surface 1130, and a seat 1134, wherein each component is made of the metal composite and has selectively tailorable mechanical and chemical properties herein. A primary difference between the system 510 (FIG. 9) and the system 1110 is the initial relative position of the seal and frustoconical member.


An amount of radial alteration that the surface 1122 of the sleeve 1118 undergoes is controlled by how far the frustoconical member 1114 is forced into the sleeve 1118. A frustoconical surface 1144 on the frustoconical member 1114 is wedgably engagable with a frustoconical surface 1148 on the sleeve 1118. As such, the further the frustoconical member 1114 is moved relative to the sleeve 1118, the greater the radial alteration of the sleeve 1118. Similarly, the seal 1126 is positioned radially of the frustoconical surface 1144 and is longitudinally fixed relative to the sleeve 1118 so the further the frustoconical member 1114 moves relative to the sleeve 1118 and the seal 1126, the greater the radial alteration of the seal 1126 and the surface 1130. The foregoing structure allows an operator to determine the amount of radial alteration of the surfaces 1122, 1130 after the system 1110 is positioned within a structure 1150.


Optionally, the system 1110 can include a collar 1154 positioned radially between the seal 1126 and the frustoconical member 1114 such that a radial dimension of the collar 1154 is also altered by the frustoconical member 1114 in response to the movement relative thereto. The collar 1154 can have a frustoconical surface 1158 complementary to the frustoconical surface 1144 such that substantially the full longitudinal extent of the collar 1154 is simultaneously radially altered upon movement of the frustoconical member 1114. The collar 1154 may be made of a metal composite that is different than that of the seal 1126 or that of the frustoconical member 1114. Thus, collar 1154 can maintain the seal 1126 at an altered radial dimension even if the frustoconical surface 1144 is later moved out of engagement with the frustoconical surface 1158, thereby maintaining the seal 1126 in sealing engagement with a wall 1162 of the structure 1150. This can be achieved by selecting the metal composite of the collar 1154 to have a higher compressive strength than that of the seal 1126.


The disintegrable system 1110 further includes a land 1136 on the frustoconical member 1114 sealably engagable with the plug 1138. Also included in the disintegrable system are a recess 1166 (within a wall 1058) of the sleeve 1118 receptive to shoulders 1170 on fingers 1174, which provisions are engagable together once the setting tool 558 compresses the disintegrable system 1110 in a similar manner as the disintegrable system 510 is settable with the setting tool 558 as shown in FIG. 9.


Referring to FIG. 16, another alternate embodiment of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system is illustrated at 1310. The disintegrable system 1310 includes a first frustoconical member 1314, sleeve 1318 positioned and configured to be radially expanded into anchoring engagement with a structure 1322, illustrated herein as a wellbore in an earth formation 1326, in response to being urged against a frustoconical surface 1330 of the first frustoconical member 1314. A collar 1334 is radially expandable into sealing engagement with the structure 1322 in response to being urged longitudinally relative to a second frustoconical member 1338 and has a seat 1342 with a surface 1346 sealingly receptive to a plug 1350 (shown with dashed lines) runnable thereagainst. The seat 1342 is displaced in a downstream direction (rightward in FIG. 16) from the collar 1334 as defined by fluid that urges the plug 1350 against the seat 1342. This configuration and position of the surface 1346 relative to the collar 1334 aids in maintaining the collar 1334 in a radially expanded configuration (after having been expanded) by minimizing radial forces on the collar 1334 due to pressure differential across the seat 1342 when plugged by a plug 1350.


To clarify, if the surface 1346 were positioned in a direction upstream of even a portion of the longitudinal extend of the collar 1334 (which it is not) then pressure built across the plug 1350 seated against the surface 1346 would generate a pressure differential radially across the portion of the collar 1334 positioned in a direction downstream of the surface 1346. This pressure differential would be defined by a greater pressure radially outwardly of the collar 1334 than radially inwardly of the collar 1334, thereby creating radially inwardly forces on the collar 1334. These radially inwardly forces, if large enough, could cause the collar 1334 to deform radially inwardly potentially compromising the sealing integrity between the collar 1334 and the structure 1322 in the process. This condition is specifically avoided by the positioning of the surface 1346 relative to the collar 1334.


Optionally, the disintegrable tubular anchoring system 1310 includes a seal 1354 positioned radially of the collar 1334 configured to facilitate sealing of the collar 1334 to the structure 1322 by being compressed radially therebetween when the collar 1334 is radially expanded. The seal 1354 is fabricated from a metal composite that has a lower compressive strength than that of the first frustoconical member 1314 to enhance sealing of the seal 1354 to both the collar 1334 and the structure 1322. In an embodiment, the seal 1354 has a lower compressive strength than that of the collar 1334.


Thus in this embodiment, the disintegrable system 1310 can include a first frustoconical member 1314, sleeve 1318, and an optional seal 1354. In the instance when the seal 1354 is not present, the collar 1334 of the first frustoconical member 1314 can form a metal-to-metal seal with the casing or liner or conform to an openhole surface. In some embodiments, the first frustoconical member 1314 contains a functionally graded metal composite such that the collar 1334 has a lower compressive strength value than that of the rest of the first frustoconical member 1314. In another embodiment the collar 1334 has a lower compressive strength than that of the second frustoconical member 1338. In yet another embodiment, the second frustoconical member 1338 has a greater compressive strength than that of the seal 1354.


The components herein can be augmented with various materials. In one embodiment, a seal, e.g., seal 528, can include a backup seal such as an elastomer material 602 as shown in FIG. 17. The elastomer can be, for example, an O-ring disposed in a gland 604 on the surface of the seal 528. The elastomer material includes but not limited to, for example, butadiene rubber (BR), butyl rubber (IIR), chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSM), epichiorohydrin rubber (ECH, ECO), ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM), ethylene propylene rubber (EPR), fluoroelastomer (FKM), nitrile rubber (NBR, HNBR, HSN), perfluoroelastomer (FFKM), polyacrylate rubber (ACM), polychloroprene (neoprene) (CR), polyisoprene (IR), polysulfide rubber (PSR), sanifluor, silicone rubber (SiR), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.


As described herein, the components, e.g., the seal, can be used in a downhole environment, for example, to provide a metal-to-metal seal. In an embodiment, a method for temporarily sealing a downhole element includes disposing a component downhole and applying pressure to deform the component. The component can include a seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, bottom, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing. The method also includes conforming the seal to a space to form a temporary seal, compressing the sleeve to engage a surface, and thereafter contacting the component with a downhole fluid to disintegrate the component. The component includes the metal composite herein having a metal matrix, disintegration agent, cellular nanomatrix, and optionally strengthening agent. The metal composite of the seal forms an inner sealing surface and an outer sealing surface disposed radially from the inner sealing surface of the seal.


According to an embodiment, a process of isolating a structure includes disposing a disintegrable tubular anchoring system herein in a structure (e.g., tubular, pipe, tube, borehole (closed or open), and the like), radially altering the sleeve to engage a surface of the structure, and radially altering the seal to the isolate the structure. The disintegrable tubular anchoring system can be contacted with a fluid to disintegrate, e.g., the seal, frustoconical member, sleeve, bottom sub or a combination of at least one of the foregoing. The process further can include setting the disintegrable anchoring system with a setting tool. Additionally, a plug can be disposed on the seal. Isolating the structure can be completely or substantially impeding fluid flow through the structure.


Moreover, the seal can have various shapes and sealing surfaces besides the particular arrangement shown in FIGS. 9 and 13-16. In another embodiment, Referring to FIGS. 18A and 18B, an embodiment of a seal disclosed herein is illustrated at 100. The seal 100 includes a metal composite, a first sealing surface 102, and a second sealing surface 104 opposingly disposed from the first sealing surface 102. The metal composite includes a metal matrix disposed in a cellular nanomatrix, a disintegration agent, and optionally a strengthening agent. The seal 100 can be any shape and conforms in situ under pressure to a surface to form a temporary seal that is selectively disintegrable in response to contact with a fluid. In this embodiment, the seal 100 is an annular shape with an outer diameter 106 and inner diameter 108. In some embodiments, the first surface 102, second surface 104, outer diameter 106, inner diameter 108, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing can be a sealing surface.


Although variations of a disintegrable tubular anchoring system have described that include several components together, it is contemplated that each component is separately and independently applicable as an article. Further, any combination of the components can be used together. Moreover, the components can be used in surface or downhole environments.


While one or more embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation. Embodiments herein are can be used independently or can be combined.


All ranges disclosed herein are inclusive of the endpoints, and the endpoints are independently combinable with each other. The suffix “(s)” as used herein is intended to include both the singular and the plural of the term that it modifies, thereby including at least one of that term (e.g., the colorant(s) includes at least one colorants). “Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance can or cannot occur, and that the description includes instances where the event occurs and instances where it does not. As used herein, “combination” is inclusive of blends, mixtures, alloys, reaction products, and the like. All references are incorporated herein by reference.


The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. “Or” means “and/or.” Further, it should further be noted that the terms “first,” “second,” and the like herein do not denote any order, quantity (such that more than one, two, or more than two of an element can be present), or importance, but rather are used to distinguish one element from another. The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (e.g., it includes the degree of error associated with measurement of the particular quantity).

Claims
  • 1. A seal comprising: a metal composite including: a cellular nanomatrix comprising a metallic nanomatrix material;a metal matrix disposed in the cellular nanomatrix, the metal matrix comprising magnesium, manganese, zinc, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing; anda disintegration agent disposed in the metal matrix, the disintegration agent comprising cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, tungsten, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing, the amount of the disintegration agent being about 0.25 wt % to about 15 wt %, based on the weight of the seal;a first sealing surface; anda second sealing surface opposingly disposed from the first sealing surface;wherein the disintegration agent is further disposed in the cellular nanomatrix external to the metal matrix, andthe metallic nanomatrix material, the metal matrix, and the disintegration agent are selected such that the seal is expandable in response to application of a force and the seal has a disintegration rate of about 1 mg/cm2/hr to about 10,000 mg/cm2/hr.
  • 2. The seal of claim 1, wherein the metallic nanomatrix material comprises aluminum, cobalt, copper, iron, magnesium, nickel, silicon, tungsten, zinc, an oxide thereof, a nitride thereof, a carbide thereof, an intermetallic compound thereof, a cermet thereof, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
  • 3. The seal of claim 1, wherein the amount of the metal matrix is about 50 wt % to about 95 wt %, based on the weight of the seal.
  • 4. The seal of claim 1, wherein the amount of the disintegration agent is about 0.25 wt % to about 1 wt %, based on the weight of the seal.
  • 5. The seal of claim 1, wherein the amount of the metal nanomatrix material is about 10 wt % to about 50 wt %, based on the weight of the seal.
  • 6. The seal of claim 1, further comprising an additive particle which includes a metal, carbon, metal oxide, metal nitride, metal carbide, intermetallic compound, cermet, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing.
  • 7. The seal of claim 6, wherein the amount additive particle is about 0.5 wt % to about 25 wt %, based on the weight of the seal.
  • 8. The seal of claim 1, wherein the seal is a temporary seal.
  • 9. The seal of claim 1, wherein the amount of the metal matrix is about 50 wt % to about 95 wt %, the amount of the disintegration agent is about 0.25 wt % to about 1 wt %, and the amount of the metal nanomatrix material is about 10 wt % to about 50 wt %, each based on the weight of the seal.
  • 10. The seal of claim 1, wherein the metal matrix comprises magnesium metal or a magnesium alloy.
  • 11. The seal of claim 1, wherein the metal matrix comprises a particle core material that is discontinuously and discretely distributed as particles within the metal composite.
  • 12. The seal of claim 1, wherein the cellular nanomatrix is substantially continuous.
  • 13. The seal of claim 12, wherein the metal composite comprises deformed powder particles formed by compacting powder particles comprising a particle core and at least one coating layer, the coating layers joined by solid-state bonding to form the substantially continuous cellular nanomatrix and leave the particle cores as the dispersed particles.
  • 14. The seal of claim 1, wherein one or more of the following apply: the seal has a percent elongation of about 10% to about 75%, based on the original size of the seal;the seal has a yield strength of about 15 ksi to about 50 ksi;the seal has a compressive strength of about 30 ksi to about 80 ksi;the seal has a temperature rating of up to 1000° F.;the seal is disintegrable in response to contact with a fluid.
  • 15. An article comprising the seal of claim 1, wherein the article is a frac plug, bridge plug, a gasket, or a flapper valve.
  • 16. The article of claim 15, wherein the seal is configured to form a metal-to-metal seal in response to application of a compressive force.
  • 17. A process for preparing a seal of claim 1, the process comprising: combining a metal matrix powder, a disintegration agent, and metal nanomatrix material to form a composition;compacting the composition to form a compacted composition;sintering the compacted composition; andpressing the sintered composition to form the seal.
  • 18. A method for temporarily sealing an element, the method comprising: applying pressure to deform a seal of claim 1;conforming the seal to a space to form a temporary seal; andcontacting the temporary seal with a fluid to disintegrate the temporary seal.
  • 19. A seal comprising: a metal composite including: a cellular nanomatrix comprising a metallic nanomatrix material;a metal matrix disposed in the cellular nanomatrix, the metal matrix comprising magnesium, manganese, zinc, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing; anda disintegration agent disposed in the metal matrix, the disintegration agent comprising cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, tungsten, or a combination comprising at least one of the foregoing, the amount of the disintegration agent being about 0.25 wt % to about 15 wt %, based on the weight of the seal;a first sealing surface; anda second sealing surface opposingly disposed from the first sealing surface;wherein the metal nanomatrix comprises a particle core material that is discontinuously and discreetly distributed as particles within the metal composite,the particle core material including a nanostructured material, andthe metallic nanomatrix material, the metal matrix, and the disintegration agent are selected such that the seal is expandable in response to application of a force and the seal has a disintegration rate of about 1 mg/cm2/hr to about 10,000 mg/cm2/hr.
  • 20. The seal of claim 19, wherein the disintegration agent is further disposed in the cellular nanomatrix external to the metal matrix.
  • 21. A method for temporarily sealing an element, the method comprising: applying pressure to deform a seal of claim 19;conforming the seal to a space to form a temporary seal; andcontacting the temporary seal with a fluid to disintegrate the temporary seal.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/466,311 filed May 8, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (889)
Number Name Date Kind
1468905 Herman Sep 1923 A
2189697 Baker Feb 1940 A
2222233 Mize Nov 1940 A
2225143 Baker et al. Dec 1940 A
2238895 Gage Apr 1941 A
2261292 Salnikov Nov 1941 A
2294648 Ansel Sep 1942 A
2301624 Holt Nov 1942 A
2352993 Albertson Jul 1944 A
2394843 Cooke et al. Feb 1946 A
2672199 McKenna Mar 1954 A
2753941 Hebard et al. Jul 1956 A
2754910 Derrick et al. Jul 1956 A
2933136 Ayers et al. Apr 1960 A
2983634 Budininkas et al. May 1961 A
3057405 Mallinger Oct 1962 A
3066391 Vordahl Dec 1962 A
3106959 Huitt et al. Oct 1963 A
3142338 Brown Jul 1964 A
3152009 Delong Oct 1964 A
3196949 Thomas Jul 1965 A
3242988 McGuire et al. Mar 1966 A
3316748 Lang et al. May 1967 A
3326291 Zandmer et al. Jun 1967 A
3343537 Graham Sep 1967 A
3347317 Zandemer Oct 1967 A
3347714 Broverman et al. Oct 1967 A
3390724 Caldwell Jul 1968 A
3395758 Kelly et al. Aug 1968 A
3406101 Kilpatrick Oct 1968 A
3416918 Roberts Dec 1968 A
3465181 Colby et al. Sep 1969 A
3489218 Means Jan 1970 A
3513230 Rhees et al. May 1970 A
3602305 Kisling Aug 1971 A
3637446 Elliott et al. Jan 1972 A
3645331 Maurer et al. Feb 1972 A
3660049 Benjamin May 1972 A
3765484 Hamby, Jr. et al. Oct 1973 A
3768563 Blount Oct 1973 A
3775823 Adolph et al. Dec 1973 A
3816080 Bomford et al. Jun 1974 A
3878889 Seabourn Apr 1975 A
3894850 Kovalchuk et al. Jul 1975 A
3924677 Prenner et al. Dec 1975 A
4010583 Highberg Mar 1977 A
4039717 Titus Aug 1977 A
4050529 Tagirov et al. Sep 1977 A
4157732 Fonner Jun 1979 A
4248307 Silberman et al. Feb 1981 A
4284137 Taylor Aug 1981 A
4292377 Petersen et al. Sep 1981 A
4372384 Kinney Feb 1983 A
4373584 Silberman et al. Feb 1983 A
4373952 Parent Feb 1983 A
4374543 Richardson Feb 1983 A
4384616 Dellinger May 1983 A
4395440 Abe et al. Jul 1983 A
4399871 Adkins et al. Aug 1983 A
4407368 Erbstoesser Oct 1983 A
4422508 Rutledge, Jr. et al. Dec 1983 A
4452311 Speegle et al. Jun 1984 A
4475729 Costigan Oct 1984 A
4498543 Pye et al. Feb 1985 A
4499048 Hanejko Feb 1985 A
4499049 Hanejko Feb 1985 A
4524825 Fore Jun 1985 A
4526840 Jerabek Jul 1985 A
4534414 Pringle Aug 1985 A
4539175 Lichti et al. Sep 1985 A
4554986 Jones Nov 1985 A
4619699 Petkovic-Luton et al. Oct 1986 A
4640354 Boisson Feb 1987 A
4664962 DesMarais, Jr. May 1987 A
4668470 Gilman et al. May 1987 A
4673549 Ecer Jun 1987 A
4674572 Gallus Jun 1987 A
4678037 Smith Jul 1987 A
4681133 Weston Jul 1987 A
4688641 Knieriemen Aug 1987 A
4690796 Paliwal Sep 1987 A
4693863 Del Corso et al. Sep 1987 A
4703807 Weston Nov 1987 A
4706753 Ohkochi et al. Nov 1987 A
4708202 Sukup et al. Nov 1987 A
4708208 Halbardier Nov 1987 A
4709761 Setterberg, Jr. Dec 1987 A
4714116 Brunner Dec 1987 A
4716964 Erbstoesser et al. Jan 1988 A
4719971 Owens Jan 1988 A
4721159 Ohkochi et al. Jan 1988 A
4738599 Shilling Apr 1988 A
4741973 Condit et al. May 1988 A
4768588 Kupsa Sep 1988 A
4775598 Jaeckel Oct 1988 A
4784226 Wyatt Nov 1988 A
4805699 Halbardier Feb 1989 A
4817725 Jenkins Apr 1989 A
4834184 Streich et al. May 1989 A
H635 Johnson et al. Jun 1989 H
4850432 Porter et al. Jul 1989 A
4853056 Hoffman Aug 1989 A
4869324 Holder Sep 1989 A
4869325 Halbardier Sep 1989 A
4880059 Brandell et al. Nov 1989 A
4889187 Terrell et al. Dec 1989 A
4890675 Dew Jan 1990 A
4901794 Baugh et al. Feb 1990 A
4909320 Hebert et al. Mar 1990 A
4929415 Okazaki May 1990 A
4932474 Schroeder, Jr. et al. Jun 1990 A
4938309 Emdy Jul 1990 A
4944351 Eriksen et al. Jul 1990 A
4949788 Szarka et al. Aug 1990 A
4952902 Kawaguchi et al. Aug 1990 A
4975412 Okazaki et al. Dec 1990 A
4977958 Miller Dec 1990 A
4981177 Carmody et al. Jan 1991 A
4986361 Mueller et al. Jan 1991 A
4997622 Regazzoni et al. Mar 1991 A
5006044 Walker, Sr. et al. Apr 1991 A
5010955 Springer Apr 1991 A
5036921 Pittard et al. Aug 1991 A
5048611 Cochran Sep 1991 A
5049165 Tselesin Sep 1991 A
5061323 DeLuccia Oct 1991 A
5063775 Walker, Sr. et al. Nov 1991 A
5073207 Faure et al. Dec 1991 A
5074361 Brisco et al. Dec 1991 A
5076869 Bourell et al. Dec 1991 A
5084088 Okazaki Jan 1992 A
5087304 Chang et al. Feb 1992 A
5090480 Pittard et al. Feb 1992 A
5095988 Bode Mar 1992 A
5103911 Heijnen Apr 1992 A
5117915 Mueller et al. Jun 1992 A
5161614 Wu et al. Nov 1992 A
5171734 Sanjurjo et al. Dec 1992 A
5178216 Giroux et al. Jan 1993 A
5181571 Mueller et al. Jan 1993 A
5183631 Kugimiya et al. Feb 1993 A
5188182 Echols, III et al. Feb 1993 A
5188183 Hopmann et al. Feb 1993 A
5204055 Sachs et al. Apr 1993 A
5222867 Walker, Sr. et al. Jun 1993 A
5226483 Williamson, Jr. Jul 1993 A
5228518 Wilson et al. Jul 1993 A
5234055 Cornette Aug 1993 A
5252365 White Oct 1993 A
5253714 Davis et al. Oct 1993 A
5271468 Streich et al. Dec 1993 A
5282509 Schurr, III Feb 1994 A
5292478 Scorey Mar 1994 A
5293940 Hromas et al. Mar 1994 A
5304260 Aikawa et al. Apr 1994 A
5304588 Boysen et al. Apr 1994 A
5309874 Willermet et al. May 1994 A
5310000 Arterbury et al. May 1994 A
5316598 Chang et al. May 1994 A
5318746 Lashmore Jun 1994 A
5352522 Kugimiya et al. Oct 1994 A
5380473 Bogue et al. Jan 1995 A
5387380 Cima et al. Feb 1995 A
5392860 Ross Feb 1995 A
5394236 Murnick Feb 1995 A
5394941 Venditto et al. Mar 1995 A
5398754 Dinhoble Mar 1995 A
5407011 Layton Apr 1995 A
5409555 Fujita et al. Apr 1995 A
5411082 Kennedy May 1995 A
5417285 Van Buskirk et al. May 1995 A
5425424 Reinhardt et al. Jun 1995 A
5427177 Jordan, Jr. et al. Jun 1995 A
5435392 Kennedy Jul 1995 A
5439051 Kennedy et al. Aug 1995 A
5454430 Kennedy et al. Oct 1995 A
5456317 Hood, III et al. Oct 1995 A
5456327 Denton et al. Oct 1995 A
5464062 Blizzard, Jr. Nov 1995 A
5472048 Kennedy et al. Dec 1995 A
5474131 Jordan, Jr. et al. Dec 1995 A
5477923 Jordan, Jr. et al. Dec 1995 A
5479986 Gano et al. Jan 1996 A
5506055 Dorfman et al. Apr 1996 A
5507439 Story Apr 1996 A
5511620 Baugh et al. Apr 1996 A
5524699 Cook Jun 1996 A
5526880 Jordan, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5526881 Martin et al. Jun 1996 A
5529746 Knoss et al. Jun 1996 A
5533573 Jordan, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5536485 Kume et al. Jul 1996 A
5558153 Holcombe et al. Sep 1996 A
5601924 Beane Feb 1997 A
5607017 Owens et al. Mar 1997 A
5623993 Van Buskirk et al. Apr 1997 A
5623994 Robinson Apr 1997 A
5636691 Hendrickson et al. Jun 1997 A
5641023 Ross et al. Jun 1997 A
5647444 Williams Jul 1997 A
5665289 Chung et al. Sep 1997 A
5677372 Yamamoto et al. Oct 1997 A
5685372 Gano Nov 1997 A
5701576 Fujita et al. Dec 1997 A
5707214 Schmidt Jan 1998 A
5709269 Head Jan 1998 A
5720344 Newman Feb 1998 A
5728195 Eastman et al. Mar 1998 A
5765639 Muth Jun 1998 A
5772735 Sehgal et al. Jun 1998 A
5782305 Hicks Jul 1998 A
5797454 Hipp Aug 1998 A
5826652 Tapp Oct 1998 A
5826661 Parker et al. Oct 1998 A
5829520 Johnson Nov 1998 A
5836396 Norman Nov 1998 A
5857521 Ross et al. Jan 1999 A
5881816 Wright Mar 1999 A
5896819 Turila et al. Apr 1999 A
5902424 Fujita et al. May 1999 A
5934372 Muth Aug 1999 A
5941309 Appleton Aug 1999 A
5960881 Allamon et al. Oct 1999 A
5985466 Atarashi et al. Nov 1999 A
5988287 Jordan, Jr. et al. Nov 1999 A
5990051 Ischy et al. Nov 1999 A
5992452 Nelson, II Nov 1999 A
5992520 Schultz et al. Nov 1999 A
6007314 Nelson, II Dec 1999 A
6024915 Kume et al. Feb 2000 A
6032735 Echols Mar 2000 A
6036777 Sachs Mar 2000 A
6047773 Zeltmann et al. Apr 2000 A
6050340 Scott Apr 2000 A
6069313 Kay May 2000 A
6076600 Vick, Jr. et al. Jun 2000 A
6079496 Hirth Jun 2000 A
6085837 Massinon et al. Jul 2000 A
6095247 Streich et al. Aug 2000 A
6119783 Parker et al. Sep 2000 A
6142237 Christmas et al. Nov 2000 A
6161622 Robb Dec 2000 A
6167970 Stout et al. Jan 2001 B1
6170583 Boyce Jan 2001 B1
6173779 Smith Jan 2001 B1
6176323 Weirich et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189616 Gano et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189618 Beeman et al. Feb 2001 B1
6213202 Read, Jr. Apr 2001 B1
6220350 Brothers et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220357 Carmichael et al. Apr 2001 B1
6228904 Yadav et al. May 2001 B1
6237688 Burleson et al. May 2001 B1
6238280 Ritt et al. May 2001 B1
6241021 Bowling Jun 2001 B1
6248399 Hehmann Jun 2001 B1
6250392 Muth Jun 2001 B1
6261432 Huber et al. Jul 2001 B1
6273187 Voisin, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6276452 Davis et al. Aug 2001 B1
6276457 Moffatt et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279656 Sinclair et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287445 Lashmore et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302205 Ryll Oct 2001 B1
6315041 Carlisle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315050 Vaynshteyn et al. Nov 2001 B2
6325148 Trahan et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328110 Joubert Dec 2001 B1
6341653 Firmaniuk et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341747 Schmidt et al. Jan 2002 B1
6349766 Bussear et al. Feb 2002 B1
6354372 Carisella et al. Mar 2002 B1
6354379 Miszewski et al. Mar 2002 B2
6357322 Dolan et al. Mar 2002 B1
6357332 Vecchio Mar 2002 B1
6371206 Mills Apr 2002 B1
6372346 Toth Apr 2002 B1
6382244 Vann May 2002 B2
6390195 Nguyen et al. May 2002 B1
6390200 Allamon et al. May 2002 B1
6394180 Berscheidt et al. May 2002 B1
6394185 Constien May 2002 B1
6397950 Streich et al. Jun 2002 B1
6401547 Hatfield et al. Jun 2002 B1
6403210 Stuivinga et al. Jun 2002 B1
6408946 Marshall et al. Jun 2002 B1
6419023 George et al. Jul 2002 B1
6439313 Thomeer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446717 White et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457525 Scott Oct 2002 B1
6467546 Allamon et al. Oct 2002 B2
6470965 Winzer Oct 2002 B1
6491097 Oneal et al. Dec 2002 B1
6491116 Berscheidt et al. Dec 2002 B2
6513598 Moore et al. Feb 2003 B2
6513600 Ross Feb 2003 B2
6540033 Sullivan et al. Apr 2003 B1
6543543 Muth Apr 2003 B2
6561275 Glass et al. May 2003 B2
6588507 Dusterhoft et al. Jul 2003 B2
6591915 Burris et al. Jul 2003 B2
6601648 Ebinger Aug 2003 B2
6601650 Sundararajan Aug 2003 B2
6609569 Howlett et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612826 Bauer et al. Sep 2003 B1
6613383 George et al. Sep 2003 B1
6619400 Brunet Sep 2003 B2
6634428 Krauss et al. Oct 2003 B2
6662886 Russell Dec 2003 B2
6675889 Mullins et al. Jan 2004 B1
6699305 Myrick Mar 2004 B2
6712153 Turley et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712797 Southern, Jr. Mar 2004 B1
6713177 George et al. Mar 2004 B2
6715541 Pedersen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6719051 Hailey, Jr. et al. Apr 2004 B2
6755249 Robison et al. Jun 2004 B2
6769491 Zimmerman et al. Aug 2004 B2
6776228 Pedersen et al. Aug 2004 B2
6779599 Mullins et al. Aug 2004 B2
6799638 Butterfield, Jr. Oct 2004 B2
6810960 Pia Nov 2004 B2
6817414 Lee Nov 2004 B2
6831044 Constien Dec 2004 B2
6883611 Smith et al. Apr 2005 B2
6887297 Winter et al. May 2005 B2
6896049 Mopes May 2005 B2
6896061 Hriscu et al. May 2005 B2
6899176 Hailey, Jr. et al. May 2005 B2
6899777 Vaidyanathan et al. May 2005 B2
6908516 Hehmann et al. Jun 2005 B2
6913827 George et al. Jul 2005 B2
6926086 Patterson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932159 Hovem Aug 2005 B2
6939388 Angeliu Sep 2005 B2
6945331 Patel Sep 2005 B2
6951331 Haughom et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959759 Doane et al. Nov 2005 B2
6973970 Johnston et al. Dec 2005 B2
6973973 Howard et al. Dec 2005 B2
6983796 Bayne et al. Jan 2006 B2
6986390 Doane et al. Jan 2006 B2
7013989 Hammond et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013998 Ray et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017664 Walker et al. Mar 2006 B2
7017677 Keshavan et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021389 Bishop et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025146 King et al. Apr 2006 B2
7028778 Krywitsky Apr 2006 B2
7044230 Starr et al. May 2006 B2
7049272 Sinclair et al. May 2006 B2
7051805 Doane et al. May 2006 B2
7059410 Bousche et al. Jun 2006 B2
7090027 Williams Aug 2006 B1
7093664 Todd et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096945 Richards et al. Aug 2006 B2
7096946 Jasser et al. Aug 2006 B2
7097807 Meeks, III et al. Aug 2006 B1
7097906 Gardner Aug 2006 B2
7108080 Tessari et al. Sep 2006 B2
7111682 Blaisdell Sep 2006 B2
7128145 Mickey Oct 2006 B2
7141207 Jandeska, Jr. et al. Nov 2006 B2
7150326 Bishop et al. Dec 2006 B2
7163066 Lehr Jan 2007 B2
7165622 Hirth et al. Jan 2007 B2
7168494 Starr et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174963 Bertelsen Feb 2007 B2
7182135 Szarka Feb 2007 B2
7188559 Vecchio Mar 2007 B1
7210527 Walker et al. May 2007 B2
7210533 Starr et al. May 2007 B2
7217311 Hong et al. May 2007 B2
7234530 Gass Jun 2007 B2
7250188 Dodelet et al. Jul 2007 B2
7252162 Akinlade et al. Aug 2007 B2
7255172 Johnson Aug 2007 B2
7255178 Slup et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264060 Wills Sep 2007 B2
7267172 Hofman Sep 2007 B2
7267178 Krywitsky Sep 2007 B2
7270186 Johnson Sep 2007 B2
7287592 Surjaatmadja et al. Oct 2007 B2
7311152 Howard et al. Dec 2007 B2
7316274 Xu et al. Jan 2008 B2
7320365 Pia Jan 2008 B2
7322412 Badalamenti et al. Jan 2008 B2
7322417 Rytlewski et al. Jan 2008 B2
7325617 Murray Feb 2008 B2
7328750 Swor et al. Feb 2008 B2
7331388 Vilela et al. Feb 2008 B2
7337854 Horn et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346456 Le Bemadjiel Mar 2008 B2
7350582 McKeachnie et al. Apr 2008 B2
7353879 Todd et al. Apr 2008 B2
7360593 Constien Apr 2008 B2
7360597 Blaisdell Apr 2008 B2
7363970 Corre et al. Apr 2008 B2
7373978 Barry et al. May 2008 B2
7384443 Mirchandani Jun 2008 B2
7387158 Murray et al. Jun 2008 B2
7387165 Lopez de Cardenas et al. Jun 2008 B2
7392841 Murray et al. Jul 2008 B2
7401648 Bennett Jul 2008 B2
7416029 Telfer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7422058 O'Malley Sep 2008 B2
7426964 Lynde et al. Sep 2008 B2
7441596 Wood et al. Oct 2008 B2
7445049 Howard et al. Nov 2008 B2
7451815 Hailey, Jr. Nov 2008 B2
7451817 Reddy et al. Nov 2008 B2
7461699 Richard et al. Dec 2008 B2
7464764 Xu Dec 2008 B2
7472750 Walker et al. Jan 2009 B2
7478676 East, Jr. et al. Jan 2009 B2
7503390 Gomez Mar 2009 B2
7503399 Badalamenti et al. Mar 2009 B2
7509993 Turng et al. Mar 2009 B1
7510018 Williamson et al. Mar 2009 B2
7513311 Gramstad et al. Apr 2009 B2
7527103 Huang et al. May 2009 B2
7537825 Vvardle et al. May 2009 B1
7552777 Murray et al. Jun 2009 B2
7552779 Murray Jun 2009 B2
7559357 Clem Jul 2009 B2
7575062 East, Jr. Aug 2009 B2
7579087 Maloney et al. Aug 2009 B2
7591318 Tilghman Sep 2009 B2
7600572 Slup et al. Oct 2009 B2
7604049 Vaidya et al. Oct 2009 B2
7604055 Richard et al. Oct 2009 B2
7607476 Tom et al. Oct 2009 B2
7617871 Surjaatmadja et al. Nov 2009 B2
7635023 Goldberg et al. Dec 2009 B2
7640988 Phi et al. Jan 2010 B2
7661480 Al-Anazi Feb 2010 B2
7661481 Todd et al. Feb 2010 B2
7665537 Patel et al. Feb 2010 B2
7686082 Marsh Mar 2010 B2
7690436 Turley et al. Apr 2010 B2
7699101 Fripp et al. Apr 2010 B2
7703510 Xu Apr 2010 B2
7703511 Buyers et al. Apr 2010 B2
7708078 Stoesz May 2010 B2
7709421 Jones et al. May 2010 B2
7712541 Loretz et al. May 2010 B2
7723272 Crews et al. May 2010 B2
7726406 Xu Jun 2010 B2
7735578 Loehr et al. Jun 2010 B2
7743836 Cook et al. Jun 2010 B2
7752971 Loehr Jul 2010 B2
7757773 Rytlewski Jul 2010 B2
7762342 Richard et al. Jul 2010 B2
7770652 Barnett Aug 2010 B2
7771289 Palumbo et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775284 Richards et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775285 Surjaatmadja et al. Aug 2010 B2
7775286 Duphorne Aug 2010 B2
7784543 Johnson Aug 2010 B2
7793714 Johnson Sep 2010 B2
7793820 Hirano et al. Sep 2010 B2
7798225 Giroux et al. Sep 2010 B2
7798226 Themig Sep 2010 B2
7798236 McKeachnie et al. Sep 2010 B2
7806189 Frazier Oct 2010 B2
7806192 Foster et al. Oct 2010 B2
7810553 Cruickshank et al. Oct 2010 B2
7810567 Daniels et al. Oct 2010 B2
7819198 Birckhead et al. Oct 2010 B2
7828055 Willauer et al. Nov 2010 B2
7833944 Munoz et al. Nov 2010 B2
7849927 Herrera Dec 2010 B2
7851016 Arbab et al. Dec 2010 B2
7855168 Fuller et al. Dec 2010 B2
7861779 Vestavik Jan 2011 B2
7861781 D'Arcy Jan 2011 B2
7874365 East, Jr. et al. Jan 2011 B2
7878253 Stowe et al. Feb 2011 B2
7896091 Williamson et al. Mar 2011 B2
7897063 Perry et al. Mar 2011 B1
7900696 Nish et al. Mar 2011 B1
7900703 Clark et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909096 Clark et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909104 Bjorgum Mar 2011 B2
7909110 Sharma et al. Mar 2011 B2
7909115 Grove et al. Mar 2011 B2
7913765 Crow et al. Mar 2011 B2
7918275 Clem Apr 2011 B2
7931093 Foster et al. Apr 2011 B2
7938191 Vaidya May 2011 B2
7946335 Bewlay et al. May 2011 B2
7946340 Surjaatmadja et al. May 2011 B2
7958940 Jameson Jun 2011 B2
7963331 Surjaatmadja et al. Jun 2011 B2
7963340 Gramstad et al. Jun 2011 B2
7963342 George Jun 2011 B2
7980300 Roberts et al. Jul 2011 B2
7987906 Troy Aug 2011 B1
7992763 Vecchio et al. Aug 2011 B2
8020619 Robertson et al. Sep 2011 B1
8020620 Daniels et al. Sep 2011 B2
8025104 Cooke, Jr. Sep 2011 B2
8028767 Radford et al. Oct 2011 B2
8033331 Themig Oct 2011 B2
8039422 Al-Zahrani Oct 2011 B1
8056628 Whitsitt et al. Nov 2011 B2
8056638 Clayton et al. Nov 2011 B2
8109340 Doane et al. Feb 2012 B2
8127856 Nish et al. Mar 2012 B1
8153052 Jackson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8163060 Imanishi et al. Apr 2012 B2
8211247 Marya et al. Jul 2012 B2
8211248 Marya Jul 2012 B2
8226740 Chaumonnot et al. Jul 2012 B2
8230731 Dyer et al. Jul 2012 B2
8231947 Vaidya et al. Jul 2012 B2
8263178 Boulos et al. Sep 2012 B2
8276670 Patel Oct 2012 B2
8277974 Kumar et al. Oct 2012 B2
8297364 Agrawal et al. Oct 2012 B2
8327931 Agrawal et al. Dec 2012 B2
8403037 Agrawal et al. Mar 2013 B2
8413727 Holmes Apr 2013 B2
8425651 Xu et al. Apr 2013 B2
8459347 Stout Jun 2013 B2
8490689 McClinton et al. Jul 2013 B1
8535604 Baker et al. Sep 2013 B1
8573295 Johnson et al. Nov 2013 B2
8631876 Xu et al. Jan 2014 B2
8734602 Li et al. May 2014 B2
8956660 Launag et al. Feb 2015 B2
9079246 Xu et al. Jul 2015 B2
9080098 Xu et al. Jul 2015 B2
9090955 Xu et al. Jul 2015 B2
9243475 Xu Jan 2016 B2
9260935 Murphree et al. Feb 2016 B2
20010040180 Wittebrood et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010045285 Russell Nov 2001 A1
20010045288 Allamon et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020000319 Brunet Jan 2002 A1
20020007948 Bayne et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020014268 Vann Feb 2002 A1
20020020527 Kilaas et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020066572 Muth Jun 2002 A1
20020092654 Coronado et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020096365 Berscheidt et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020104616 De et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020108756 Harrall et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020136904 Glass et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020139541 Sheffield et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162661 Krauss et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030019639 Mackay Jan 2003 A1
20030037925 Walker et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030060374 Cooke, Jr. Mar 2003 A1
20030075326 Ebinger Apr 2003 A1
20030104147 Bretschneider et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030111728 Thai et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030127013 Zavitsanos Jul 2003 A1
20030141060 Hailey et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030141061 Hailey et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030141079 Doane et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030150614 Brown et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030155114 Pedersen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030155115 Pedersen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159828 Howard et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030164237 Butterfield Sep 2003 A1
20030183391 Hriscu et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030226668 Zimmerman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005483 Lin Jan 2004 A1
20040020832 Richards et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040031605 Mickey Feb 2004 A1
20040045723 Slup et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055758 Brezinski et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040058167 Arbab et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040069502 Luke Apr 2004 A1
20040089449 Walton et al. May 2004 A1
20040094297 Malone et al. May 2004 A1
20040154806 Bode et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040159428 Hammond et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040159446 Haugen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040182583 Doane et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040216868 Owen, Sr. Nov 2004 A1
20040231845 Cooke, Jr. Nov 2004 A1
20040251025 Giroux et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040256109 Johnson Dec 2004 A1
20040256157 Tessari et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261993 Nguyen Dec 2004 A1
20040261994 Nguyen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050034876 Doane et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050051329 Blaisdell Mar 2005 A1
20050064247 Sane Mar 2005 A1
20050069449 Jackson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050074612 Eklund et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050098313 Atkins et al. May 2005 A1
20050102255 Bultman May 2005 A1
20050106316 Rigney et al. May 2005 A1
20050126334 Mirchandani Jun 2005 A1
20050161212 Leismer et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050161224 Starr et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165149 Chanak et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050194143 Xu et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050199401 Patel et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205264 Starr et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205265 Todd et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205266 Todd et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050235757 De Jonge et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050241824 Burris, II et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050241825 Burris, II et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050257936 Lehr Nov 2005 A1
20050268746 Abkowitz et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050269097 Towler Dec 2005 A1
20050275143 Toth Dec 2005 A1
20050279501 Surjaatmadja et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060012087 Matsuda et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013350 Akers Jan 2006 A1
20060045787 Jandeska et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060057479 Niimi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060081378 Howard et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060102871 Wang May 2006 A1
20060108114 Johnson et al. May 2006 A1
20060108126 Horn et al. May 2006 A1
20060110615 Karim et al. May 2006 A1
20060116696 Odermatt et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060124310 Lopez de Cardenas et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131011 Lynde et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131031 McKeachnie et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131081 Mirchandani et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060134312 Rytlewski et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060144515 Tada et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060150770 Freim Jul 2006 A1
20060151178 Howard et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060153728 Schoenung et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060162927 Walker et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060169453 Savery et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060186602 Martin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060207763 Hofman et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060213670 Bishop et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060231253 Vilela et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060283592 Sierra et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070017674 Blaisdell Jan 2007 A1
20070017675 Hammami Jan 2007 A1
20070029082 Giroux et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070039161 Garcia Feb 2007 A1
20070039741 Hailey Feb 2007 A1
20070044958 Rytlewski et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070044966 Davies et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070051521 Fike et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070053785 Hetz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070054101 Sigalas et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070057415 Katagiri et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070062644 Nakamura et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074601 Hong et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070074873 McKeachnie et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070102199 Smith et al. May 2007 A1
20070107899 Werner et al. May 2007 A1
20070107908 Vaidya et al. May 2007 A1
20070108060 Park May 2007 A1
20070119600 Slup et al. May 2007 A1
20070131912 Simone et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070151009 Conrad, III et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070151769 Slutz et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070169935 Akbar et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070181224 Marya et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070185655 Le Bemadjiel Aug 2007 A1
20070187095 Walker et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070207182 Weber et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070221373 Murray Sep 2007 A1
20070221384 Murray Sep 2007 A1
20070227745 Roberts et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070259994 Tour et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070261862 Murray Nov 2007 A1
20070272411 Lopez De Cardenas et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070272413 Rytlewski et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070277979 Todd et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070284109 East et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070284112 Magne et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299510 Venkatraman et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080011473 Wood et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080020923 Debe et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080047707 Boney et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080060810 Nguyen et al. Mar 2008 A9
20080066923 Xu Mar 2008 A1
20080066924 Xu Mar 2008 A1
20080072705 Chaumonnot et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080078553 George Apr 2008 A1
20080081866 Gong et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080093073 Bustos et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080099209 Loretz et al. May 2008 A1
20080105438 Jordan et al. May 2008 A1
20080115932 Cooke May 2008 A1
20080121390 O'Malley et al. May 2008 A1
20080121436 Slay et al. May 2008 A1
20080127475 Griffo Jun 2008 A1
20080135249 Fripp et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080149325 Crawford Jun 2008 A1
20080149345 Bicerano Jun 2008 A1
20080149351 Marya et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080169105 Williamson et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080169130 Norman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179060 Surjaatmadja et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179104 Zhang et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080196801 Zhao et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080202764 Clayton et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080202814 Lyons et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080210473 Zhang et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080216383 Pierick et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080223586 Barnett Sep 2008 A1
20080223587 Cherewyk Sep 2008 A1
20080236829 Lynde Oct 2008 A1
20080236842 Bhavsar et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080248205 Blanchet et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080248413 Ishii et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080264594 Lohmueller et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080277109 Vaidya Nov 2008 A1
20080277980 Koda et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080282924 Saenger et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080296024 Tianping et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080302538 Hofman Dec 2008 A1
20080314581 Brown Dec 2008 A1
20080314588 Langlais et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090038858 Griffo et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044946 Schasteen et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090044949 King et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090050334 Marya et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090056934 Xu Mar 2009 A1
20090065216 Frazier Mar 2009 A1
20090074603 Chan et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090084553 Rytlewski et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090084556 Richards et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090084600 Severance Apr 2009 A1
20090090440 Kellett et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090107684 Cooke, Jr. Apr 2009 A1
20090114381 Stroobants May 2009 A1
20090114382 Grove et al. May 2009 A1
20090126436 Fly et al. May 2009 A1
20090139720 Frazier Jun 2009 A1
20090145666 Radford et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090151949 Marya et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090152009 Slay et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090155616 Thamida et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090159289 Avant et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090178808 Williamson et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090194273 Surjaatmadja et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090205841 Kluge et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090211770 Nutley et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090226340 Marya Sep 2009 A1
20090226704 Kauppinen et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090242202 Rispler et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090242208 Bolding Oct 2009 A1
20090242214 Foster et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090255667 Clem et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090255684 Bolding Oct 2009 A1
20090255686 Richard Oct 2009 A1
20090266548 Olsen et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090260817 Gambier et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090272544 Giroux et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090283270 Langeslag Nov 2009 A1
20090293672 Mirchandani et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090301730 Gweily Dec 2009 A1
20090305131 Kumar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090308588 Howell et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090317556 Macary Dec 2009 A1
20090317622 Huang et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100003536 Smith et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100012385 Drivdahl et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100015002 Barrera et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100015469 Romanowski et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100025255 Su et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100032151 Duphorne et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100034857 Launag et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038076 Spray et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100038595 Imholt et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100040180 Kim et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100044041 Smith et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100051278 Mytopher et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100055491 Vecchio et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100055492 Barsoum et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100089583 Xu et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100089587 Stout Apr 2010 A1
20100101803 Clayton et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100116495 Spray May 2010 A1
20100122817 Surjaatmadja et al. May 2010 A1
20100139930 Patel et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100200230 East, Jr. et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100236793 Bjorgum Sep 2010 A1
20100236794 Duan et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100243254 Murphy et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100252273 Duphorne Oct 2010 A1
20100252280 Swor et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100270031 Patel Oct 2010 A1
20100276136 Evans et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100276159 Mailand et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282338 Gerrard et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282469 Richard et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100294510 Holmes Nov 2010 A1
20100297432 Sherman et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100304182 Facchini et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100314105 Rose Dec 2010 A1
20100314126 Kellner Dec 2010 A1
20100319870 Bewlay et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100326650 Tran et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110005773 Dusterhoft et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110036592 Fay Feb 2011 A1
20110048743 Stafford et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110052805 Bordere et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110056692 Lopez De Cardenas et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110056702 Sharma et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067872 Agrawal Mar 2011 A1
20110067889 Marya et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110067890 Themig Mar 2011 A1
20110094406 Marya et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110100643 Themig et al. May 2011 A1
20110127044 Radford et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132143 Xu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132612 Agrawal et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132619 Agrawal et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132620 Agrawal et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110132621 Agrawal et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110135530 Xu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110135805 Doucet et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110135953 Xu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110136707 Xu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110139465 Tibbles et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110147014 Chen et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110186306 Marya et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110214881 Newton Sep 2011 A1
20110247833 Todd et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110253387 Ervin Oct 2011 A1
20110256356 Tomantschger et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110259610 Shkurti et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110277987 Frazier Nov 2011 A1
20110277989 Frazier Nov 2011 A1
20110284232 Huang Nov 2011 A1
20110284240 Chen et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110284243 Frazier Nov 2011 A1
20110300403 Vecchio et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110314881 Hatcher et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120067426 Soni et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120090839 Rudic Apr 2012 A1
20120103135 Xu et al. May 2012 A1
20120107590 Xu et al. May 2012 A1
20120118583 Johnson et al. May 2012 A1
20120130470 Agnew May 2012 A1
20120145378 Frazier Jun 2012 A1
20120145389 Fitzpatrick, Jr. Jun 2012 A1
20120168152 Casciaro et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120177905 Seals et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120205120 Howell Aug 2012 A1
20120205872 Reinhardt et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120211239 Kritzler et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120234546 Xu et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120234547 O'Malley et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120267101 Cooke Oct 2012 A1
20120292053 Xu et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120318513 Mazyar et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130004847 Kumar et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130008671 Booth et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130025409 Xu Jan 2013 A1
20130029886 Mazyar et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130032357 Mazyar et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130048304 Agrawal et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130048305 Xu et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130052472 Xu Feb 2013 A1
20130081814 Gaudette et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130084643 Commarieu et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130105159 Alvarez May 2013 A1
20130126190 Mazyar et al. May 2013 A1
20130131966 Hirano May 2013 A1
20130133897 Baihly et al. May 2013 A1
20130146144 Joseph et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130146302 Gaudette et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130168257 Mazyar et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130186626 Aitken et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130240200 Frazier Sep 2013 A1
20130240203 Frazier Sep 2013 A1
20130299185 Xu et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130299192 Xu et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130300066 Xu et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130327540 Hamid et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140014339 O'Malley et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140027128 Johnson et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140060834 Quintero et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140116711 Tang et al. May 2014 A1
20140262327 Xu et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140360728 Tashiro et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150060085 Xu Mar 2015 A1
20150065401 Xu et al. Mar 2015 A1
20160209391 Zhang et al. Jul 2016 A1
20160258242 Hayter et al. Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number Date Country
2783241 Jun 2011 CA
2783346 Jun 2011 CA
1076968 Oct 1993 CN
1079234 Dec 1993 CN
1255879 Jun 2000 CN
2658384 Nov 2004 CN
1668545 Sep 2005 CN
101050417 Oct 2007 CN
101351523 Jan 2009 CN
101454074 Jun 2009 CN
101457321 Jun 2009 CN
101605963 Dec 2009 CN
101720378 Jun 2010 CN
0033625 Aug 1981 EP
1174385 Jan 2002 EP
1412175 Apr 2004 EP
1798301 Aug 2006 EP
1857570 Nov 2007 EP
2782096 Feb 2000 FR
912956 Dec 1962 GB
1046330 Oct 1966 GB
1280833 Jul 1972 GB
1357065 Jun 1974 GB
61067770 Apr 1986 JP
754008 Feb 1995 JP
8232029 Sep 1996 JP
2000185725 Jul 2000 JP
2002053902 Feb 2002 JP
2004225084 Aug 2004 JP
2004225765 Aug 2004 JP
2005076052 Mar 2005 JP
2010502840 Jan 2010 JP
950014350 Nov 1995 KR
9909227 Feb 1999 WO
9947726 Sep 1999 WO
2004001087 Dec 2003 WO
2004073889 Sep 2004 WO
2005040068 May 2005 WO
2007044635 Apr 2007 WO
2007095376 Aug 2007 WO
2008034042 Mar 2008 WO
2008057045 May 2008 WO
2008079485 Jul 2008 WO
2008079777 Jul 2008 WO
2009079745 Jul 2009 WO
2010012184 Feb 2010 WO
2011071902 Jun 2011 WO
2011071907 Jun 2011 WO
2011071910 Jun 2011 WO
2011130063 Feb 2012 WO
2012015567 Feb 2012 WO
2012149007 Nov 2012 WO
2012174101 Dec 2012 WO
2013053057 Apr 2013 WO
2013078031 May 2013 WO
2014121384 Aug 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (108)
Entry
“Declaration of Karl T. Hartwig in Support of Petitioner Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.120”, executed on Nov. 21, 2016 in support of U.S. Pat. No. 8,573,295, 52 pages.
“Declaration of Karl T. Hartwig in Support of Petitioner Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.120”, executed on Nov. 21, 2016 in support of U.S. Pat. No. 9,101,978, 51 pages.
Adams, et al.; “Thermal stabilities of aromatic acids as geothermal tracers”, Geothermics, vol. 21, No. 3, 1992, pp. 323-339.
Aviles et al, “Degradable Alternative to Risky Mill-Out Operations in Plug and PERF”; SPE-173695-MS; Society of Petroleum Engineers; SPE/ICOTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference & Exhibition; Mar. 24-25, 2015; 10 Pages.
Ayman, et al.; “Effect of Consolidation and Extrusion Temperatures on Tensile Properties of Hot Extruded ZK61 Magnesium Alloy Gas Atomized Powders via Spark Plasma Sintering”, Transactions of JWRI, vol. 38 (2009), No. 2, pp. 1-5.
Baker Hughes Incorporated. IN-Tallic Disintegrating Frac Balls. Houston: Baker Hughes Incorporated, 2011. Accessed Mar. 6, 2015.
Baker Hughes, “Multistage”, Oct. 31, 2011, BakerHughes.com; accessed Mar. 6, 2015.
Bin et al., “Advances in Fluidization CVD Technology”, East China University of Chemical Technology, China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, vol. 13, No. 4, Nov. 1992, pp. 360-365, English Abstract on p. 366.
Canister, Jr., William D., Materials Science and Engineering an Introduction, Seventh Edition, 2006, pp. 111, 627, and G7.
Chuan-Jun et al., “Study on Corrosion Kinetics of Mg—Ni alloys”, Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology, vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 10-13, Oct. 2009.
German, Randall M., Powder Metallurgy Science, Second Edition, 1994, 102 pages.
Klar, Erhard, ASM Handbook: International Metals Handbook—Powder Metallurgy, vol. 7, 1997, pp. 14, 276, and 798.
Lin et al., “Processing and Microstructure of Nano-Mo/Al2O3 Composites from MOCVD and Fluidized Bed”, Nanostructured Materials, Nov. 1999, vol. 11, No. 8, pp. 1361-1377.
Petition for Inter Partes Review; Case No. IPR2017-00326; U.S. Pat. No. 9,101,978; Nov. 23, 2016; 46 pages.
Petition for Inter Partes Review; Case No. IPR2017-00327; U.S. Pat. No. 8,573,295; Nov. 23, 2016; 53 pages.
Reid, Gary Carl, “Literature evaluation of induced groundwater tracers, field tracer techniques, and hydrodynamic dispersion values in porous media”, Theisis in Geosciences (Masters), Texas Tech University, Aug. 1981, 109 pages.
Rose, et al.; “The application of the polyaromatic sulfonates as tracers in geothermal reservoirs”, Geothermics 30 (2001) pp. 617-640.
Saravanan et al, “Mechanically Alloyed Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) Reinforced Nanocrystalline AA 4032: Synthesis and Characterization”, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, vol. 9, No. 11 pp. 1027-1035 2010.
Schaffer, James P. et al., The Science and Design of Engineering Materials, Second Edition, 1999, pp. 122, 123, 698, and 699.
Shigematsu, et al., “Surface Treatment of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy by Aluminum diffusion Coating”, Journal of Materials Science Letters 19, 2000, pp. 473-475.
Singh, et al., “Extended Homogeneity Range of Intermetallic Phases in Mechanically Alloyed Mg—Al Alloys”, Elsevier Sciences Ltd., Intemetallics 11, 2003, pp. 373-376.
Spencer et al., “Fluidized Bed Polymer Particle ALD Process for Producing HDPE/Alumina Nanocomposites”, The 12th International Conference on Fluidization—New Horizons in Fluidization Engineering, vol. RP4 (2007).
Stanley, et al.; “An Introduction to Ground-Water Tracers”, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Mar. 1985, pp. 1-219.
Tsipas et al. “Effect of High Energy Ball Milling on Titanium-Hydroxyapatite Powders” Powder Metallurgy, Maney Publishing, London, GB, vol. 46, No. 1, Mar. 2003 (Mar. 2003), pp. 73-77.
Xie, Guoqiang et al., “TEM Observation of Interfaces between Particles in Al—Mg Alloy Powder Compacts Prepared by Pulse Electric Current Sintering”, Materials Transactions, 2002, pp. 2177-2180, vol. 43—No. 9.
Zemel, “Tracers in the Oil Field”, University of Texas at Austin, Center for Petroleum and Geosystems, Jan. 1995, Chapters 1, 2, 3, 7.
“Sliding Sleeve”, Omega Completion Technology Ltd, Sep. 29, 2009, retrieved on: www.omega-completion.com.
Ambat, et al., “Electroless Nickel-Plating on AZ91D Magnesium Alloy: Effect of Substrate Microstructure and Plating Parameters”; Surface and Coatings Technology; 179; pp. 124-134; (2004).
Baker Oil Tools, “Baker Oil Tools Introduces Revolutionary Sand Control Completion Technology,” May 2, 2005.
Baker Oil Tools, “Z-Seal Metal-to-Metal Expandable Sealing Device Uses Expanding Metal in Place of Elastomers,” Nov. 6, 2006.
Bastow, et al., “Clustering and formation of nano-precipitates in dilute aluminum and magnesium alloys”, Materials Science and Engineering, 2003, C23, 757-762.
Bercegeay, et al., “A One-Trip Gravel Packing System”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, Offshort Technology Conference, SPE Paper No. 4771; Feb. 7-8, 1974.
Bybee, “One-Trip Completion System Eliminates Perforations,” Completions Today, Sep. 2007, pp. 52-53.
Chang, et al., “Electrodeposition of Aluminum on Magnesium Alloy in Aluminum Chloride (A1C13)-1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIC) Ionic Liquid and Its Corrosion Behavior”; Electrochemistry Communications; 9; pp. 1602-1606; (2007).
Christoglou, et al., “Deposition of Aluminum on Magnesium by a CVD Process”, Surface and Coatings Technology 184 (2004) 149-155.
Constantine, “Selective Production of Horizontal Openhole Completions Using ECP and Sliding Sleeve Technology.” SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, May 15-18, 1999, Gillette, Wyoming. [Abstract Only].
Curtin, et al., “CNT-reinforced ceramics and metals,” Materials Today, 2004, vol. 7, pp. 44-49.
Flahaut, et al., “Carbon Nanotube-Metal-Oxide Nanocomposites: Microstructure, Electrical Conductivity and Mechanical Properties” Acta amter. 48 (2000), pp. 3803-3812.
Forsyth, et al.; “An Ionic Liquid Surface Treatment for Corrosion Protection of Magnesium Alloy AZ31”; Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2006 vol. 9, Issue 11, B52-B55/ 9(11); Abstract only; 1 page.
Galanty, et al. “Consolidation of metal powders during the extrusion process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology (2002), pp. 491-496.
Garfield, “Formation Damage Control Utilizing Composite-Bridge-Plug Technology for Monobore, Multizone Stimulation Operations,” SPE 70004, 2001, Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Per.
Garfield, et al., “Maximizing Inflow Performance in Soft Sand Completions Using New One-trip Sand Control Liner Completion Technology”, SPE European Formation Damage Conference, May 25-27, 2005.
Goh, et al., “Development of novel carbon nanotube reinforced magnesium nanocomposites using the powder metallurgy technique”, Nanottechnology 17 (2006) 7-12.
Han, et al., “Mechanical Properties of Nanostructured Materials”, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 9(2005) 1-16.
Hermawan, et al., “Iron-manganese: new class of metallic degradable biomaterials prepared by powder metallurgy”, Powder Metallurgy, vol. 51, No. 1, (2008), pp. 38-45.
Hjortstam, et al. “Can we achieve ultra-low resistivity in carbon nanotube-based metal composites,” Applied Physics A (2004), vol. 78, Issue 8, pp. 1175-1179.
Hsiao et al., “Baking Treatment Effect on Materials Characteristics and Electrochemical Behavior of anodic Film Formed on AZ91D Magnesium Alloy”; Corrosion Science; 49; pp. 781-793; (2007).
Hsiao, et al., “Effect of Heat Treatment on Anodization and Electrochemical Behavior of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy”; J. Mater. Res.; 20(10); pp. 2763-2771;(2005).
Lvernia et al. “Cryomilled Nanostructured Materials: Processing and Properties”, Materials Science and Engineering A, 493, (2008) pp. 207-214.
Li, “Design of Abrasive Water Jet Perforation and Hydraulic Fracturing Tool,” Oil Field Equipment, Mar. 2011.
Maisano, “Cryomilling of Aluminum-Based and Magnesium-Based Metal Powders”, Thesis, Virginia Tech, Jan. 13, 2006.
Seyni, et al., “On the interest of using degradable fillers in co-ground composite materials”, Powder Technology 190, (2009) pp. 176-184.
Vahlas, et al., “Principles and Applications of CVD Powder Technology”, Materials Science and Engineering R 53 (2006) pp. 1-72.
“Optisleeve Sliding Sleeve”, [online]; [retrieved on Jun. 25, 2010]; retrieved from the Internet weatherford.com/weatherford/groups/.../weatherfordcorp/WFT033159.pdf.
Baker Hughes, “Flow Control Systems,” [online]; [retrieved on May 20, 2010]; retrieved from the Internet http://www.bakerhughes.com/products-and-services/completions-and-productions/well-completions/packers-and-flow-control/flow-control-systems.
Bououdina, et al., “Comparative Study of Mechanical Alloying of (Mg+Al) and (Mg+Al+Ni) Mixtures for Hydrogen Storage”, J. Alloys, Compds, 2002, 336, 222-231.
Carrejo, et al., “Improving Flow Assurance in Multi-Zone Fracturing Treatments in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs with High Strength Corrodible Tripping Balls”; Society of Petroleum Engineers; SPE Paper No. 151613; Apr. 16, 2012; 6 pages.
Coronado, “Development of an Internal Coiled Tubing Connector Utilizing Permanent Packer Technology”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 46036; Apr. 15, 1998; 10 pages.
Garfield, New One-Trip Sand-Control Completion System that Eliminates Formation Damage Resulting From conventional Perforating and Gravel-Packing Operations:, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 9-12, 2005.
Gray, et al., “Protective Coatings on Magnesium and Its Alloys—a Critical Review”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 336 (2002), pp. 88-113.
Hsiao, et al., “Anodization of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy in Silicate-Containing Electrolytes”; Surface & Coatings Technology; 199; pp. 127-134; (2005).
Hsiao, et al., “Characterization of Anodic Films Formed on AZ91D Magnesium Alloy”; Surface & Coatings Technology; 190; pp. 299-308; (2005).
Huo et al.; “Corrosion of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy with a Chemical Conversion Coating and Electroless Nickel Layer”; Corrosion Science: 46; pp. 1467-1477; (2004).
Kuzumaki, et al.; “Mechanical Characteristics and Preparation of Carbon Nanotube Fiber-Reinforced Ti Composite”, Advanced Engineering Materials, 2000, 2, No. 7.
Liu, et al., “Calculated Phase Diagrams and the Corrosion of Die-Cast Mg—Al Alloys”, Corrosion Science, 2009, 51, 606-619.
Lunder et al.; “The Role of Mg17Al12 Phase in the Corrosion of Mg Alloy AZ91”; Corrosion; 45(9); pp. 741-748; (1989).
Majumdar, et al., “Laser Surface Engineering of a Magnesium Alloy with Al+ Al2O3”, Surface and Coatings Technology 179 (2004) pp. 297-305.
Murray, “Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams” Int. Met. Rev., 30(5) 1985 vol. 1, pp. 103-187.
Nie, “Patents of Methods to Prepare Intermetallic Matrix Composites: A Review”, Recent Patents on Materials Science 2008, vol. 1, pp. 232-240.
Saravanan et al., “Mechanically Alloyed Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) Reinforced Nanocrystalline AA 4032: Synthesis and Characterization,” Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, vol. 9, No. 11, pp. 1027-1035, 2010.
Shaw, “Benefits and Application of a Surface-Controlled Sliding Sleeve for Fracturing Operations”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 147546; Oct. 30, 2011; 8 pages.
Song, “Recent Progress in Corrosion and Protection of Magnesium Alloys”; Advanced Engineering Materials; 7(7); pp. 563-586; (2005).
Song, et al.; “A Possible Biodegradable Magnesium Implant Material,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 9, Issue 4, Apr. 2007, pp. 298-302.
Song, et al.; “Corrosion Behaviour of AZ21, AZ501 and AZ91 in Sodium Chloride”; Corrosion Science; 40(10); pp. 1769-1791; (1998).
Triolo et al., “Resolving the Completion Engineer's Dilemma: Permanent or Retrievable Packer?”; Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 76711; May 20, 2002; 16 pages.
Vernon Constien et al., “Development of Reactive Coatings to Protect Sand-Control Screens”, SPE 112494, Copyright 2008, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Presented at the 2008 SPE International Symposium and Exhibition 3ri Formation Damage Control.
Walters, et al.; “A Study of Jets from Unsintered-Powder Metal Lined Nonprecision Small-Caliber Shaped Charges”, Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5066; Feb. 2001.
Wang, et al., “Contact-Damage-Resistant Ceramic/Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes and Ceramic/Graphite Composites” Nature Materials, vol. 3, Aug. 2004, pp. 539-544.
Watanabe, et al., “Superplastic Deformation Mechanism in Powder Metallurgy Magnesium Alloys and Composites”, Acta mater. 49 (2001) pp. 2027-2037.
Watarai, Trend of research and development for magnesium alloys-reducing the weight of structural materials in motor vehicles, (2006) Science and technology trends, Quaterly review No. 18, 84-97.
Welch et al., “Nonelastomeric Sliding Sleeve Maintains Long Term Integrity in HP/HT Application: Case Histories” [Abstract Only], SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Oct. 23-25, 1996, Columbus. Ohio.
Xu, et al., “Nanostructured Material-Based Completion Tools Enhance Well Productivity”; International Petroleum Technology Conference; Conference Paper IPTC 16538; International Petroleum Technology Conference 2013; 4 pages.
Zhan, et al., “Single-wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites” Nature Materials, vol. 2., Jan. 2003, pp. 38-42.
Zhang, et al.; “Formation of metal nanowires on suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes” Applied Physics Letter, vol. 77, No. 19 (2000), pp. 3015-3017.
Zhang, et al.; “Study on the Environmentally Friendly Anodizing of AZ91D Magnesium Alloy”; Surface and Coatings Technology: 161; pp. 36-43; (2002).
Zhu, et al., “The process of coating on ultrafine particles by surface hydrolysis reaction in a fluidized bed reactor”, Surface and Coatings Technology 135 (2000) 14-17.
“Baker Hughes Refines Expandable Tubular Technology with Abaqus and Isight”, Simulia Realistic Simulation News, Jan./Feb. 2011, pp. 12-13.
“Reactivity series”, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reactivity_series&printable=yes downloaded on May 18, 2014. 8 pages.
Bakshi et al., “Carbon nanotube reinforced metal matrix composites—a review,” International Materials Reviews; 2010, pp. 41-64, vol. 55, No. 1.
Birbilis, et al., “Exploring Corrosion Protection of Mg Via Ionic Liquid Pretreatment”, Surface & Coatings Technology; 201, pp. 4496-4504, (2007).
Feng, et al., “Electroless Plating of Carbon Nanotubes with Silver” Journal of Materials Science, 39, (2004) pp. 3241-3243.
Lee, et al., “Effects of Ni addition on hydrogen storage properties of Mg17AL12 alloy”, Materials Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 126, pp. 319-324.
Li, et al., “Investigation of aluminium-based nanocomposites with ultra-high strength”, Materials Science and Engineering A, 527, pp. 305-316, (2009).
Liu, et al.; “Electroless Nickel Plating on AZ91 Mg Alloy Substrate”; Surface & Coatings Technology; 200; pp. 5087-5093; (2006).
Mathis, “Sand Management: A Review of Approaches and Concerns”, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Paper No. 82240, SPE European Formation Damage Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, May 13-14, 2003.
Pardo, et al.; “Corrosion Behaviour of Magnesium/Aluminium Alloys in 3.5 wt% NaC1”; Corrosion Science; 50; pp. 823-834; (2008).
Quik Drill Composite Frac Plug; Baker Hughes, Baker Oil Tools; Copyright 2002; 3 pages.
Shi, et al.; “Influence of the Beta Phase on the Corrosion Performance of Anodised Coatings on Magnesium-Aluminium Alloys”; Corrosion Science; 47; pp. 2760-2777; (2005).
Shimizu, et al., “Multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced magnesium alloy composites”, Scripta Materialia, vol. 58, Issue 4, Feb. 2008, pp. 267-270.
Shumbera, et al. “Improved Water Injector Performance in a Gulf of Mexico Deepwater Development Using an Openhole Frac Pack Completion and Downhole Filter System: Case History.” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 5-8, 2003.
Song, et al.; “Corrosion Mechanisms of Magnesium Alloys”; Advanced Engineering Materials; 1(1); pp. 11-33; (1999).
Song, et al.; “Influence of Microstructure on the Corrosion of Diecast AZ91D”; Corrosion Science; 41; pp. 249-273; (1999).
Song, et al.; “Understanding Magnesium Corrosion”; Advanced Engineering Materials; 5; No. 12; pp. 837-858; (2003).
Sun, et al.; “Colloidal Processing of Carbon Nanotube/Alumina Composites” Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, pp. 5169-5172.
Vickery, et al.; “New One-Trip Multi-Zone Frac Pack System with Positive Positioning.” European Petroleum Conference, Oct. 29-31, 2002, Aberdeen, UK. [Abstract Only].
Zeng, et al. “Progress and Challenge for Magnesium Alloys as Biomaterials,” Advanced Engineering Materials, vol. 10, Issue 8, Aug. 2008, pp. B3-B14.
Zhang, et al.; “High Strength Nanostructured Materials and Their Oil Field Applications”; Society of Petroleum Engineers; Conference Paper SPE 157092; SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference, 2012; 6 pages.
Zhang, et al.; “Metal Coating on Suspended Carbon Nanotubes and its Implication to Metal—Tube Interaction”, Chemical Physics Letters 331 (2000) 35-41.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170138479 A1 May 2017 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13466311 May 2012 US
Child 15411060 US