The present invention concerns a disintegrator for textile machines, especially for spinning machines, such as, for example, open-end or air-nozzle spinning machines, wherein a plurality of teeth is placed on the outer circumference of a disintegrating roll.
In the case of modern textile machines, such as, for example, spinning machines, the production of a thread from a fibers requires that these fibers be released from the compaction of the feed material to form individual, free fibers. This step is carried out prior to the subjection of the fibers to the next operation, which could possibly be a spinning procedure to produce a fiber band from which thread can be spun. At this point, partially different requirements are brought to bear on disintegration apparatuses. The reason for this can be attributed to entirely different kinds of fibers, that are to be worked. Additionally, each kind of fiber calls for entirely different work-up conditions. For example, one can mention here the difference between cotton fibers and chemically produced fibers. Both types of fibers possess very differing fiber characteristics, which are necessary to cope with in a disintegrator apparatus. Moreover, cotton fibers are frequently contaminated with foreign materials and carry substances such as shells or sand, which are to be treated in the process without causing disturbances.
In former years, on this account, a multitude of tooth geometries for disintegrator apparatuses were developed, each of which, for example, sought to achieve a universality of application for many materials. That is to say, it was desirable that each disintegrator could work with the greatest number of fiber types. Other tooth geometries were specialized to treat individual types of fibers and were consequently optimized for one fiber type of a narrow range of properties. The result of this was, that these specialty disintegrators, became limited in their usage and for example, were applied either only for natural fibers such as cotton or were exclusively intended for synthetic fibers of the like of viscose or polyester fibers.
Additionally, DE 199 21 965 A1 discloses a fine-tooth equipped disintegrator roll for an open end spinning machine. The height of the teeth clearly exceeds the pitch thereof, and the teeth exhibit a positive, forward angle (hereinafter “forward rake”) of inclination from the vertical. For this careful arrangement of the teeth, provision has been made that the allotment of teeth per unit length is at least three times the height of the said teeth and the forward rake is at least 10°. Such toothing, wherein the tooth height could lie under 2 mm, is determined to be a specialty reserved for the working of synthetic fiber materials. The very close spacing of the teeth has the purpose of assuring that the relatively stiff fibers of synthetic material at the entrance of a machine intake fitting properly disengage from the teeth. The fine teeth, placed close to one another, prevent the fibers from penetrating too deeply into the toothing. This allows the fibers to easily release with is a characteristic that is highly desirable in an approach to a spinning machine feed fitting.
The technological characteristics of disintegration apparatuses do not, however, lie only in the size of the teeth in service, but the very geometry thereof has a decisive influence. As an example, under this classification would be included the very important forward rake of individual teeth and the provided, relative speed between the tooth and the fibers. Experience has demonstrated that in particular applications, difficulties can always arise due to the geometry of the tooth. The reason is that certain tooth-geometries have a good result in separating the incoming fibers, but such geometry can also yield individual fibers in an insufficient amount. Conversely, other tooth geometries exhibit a good yield of the disintegrated fibers, but at the same time leave something to be desired as to the breaking up of the incoming fiber band.
Thus, an objective of the present invention is to create a tooth geometry that provides simultaneously a good possibility for disintegration of fiber material and also a satisfactory yield of free fibers after the disintegration procedure ends.
Objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
For achieving the above stated purpose, the invented disintegration apparatus can include teeth that are apportioned with a separation distance between them of, at the most, 20 mm, preferably of less than 12 mm. Preferably, each tooth consists of at least two sections. The first section is located at a tooth apex and possesses a positive or at least a perpendicular forward rake. The second section has a declining slant in the direction of movement of the equipment. Further, the separating distance between the apices of the teeth and an joining point of a vertical tangent at the transition zone between the said first and the second sections form a technologically effective tooth height, whereby the ratio between the technologically effective tooth height to the inter-tooth spacing runs not greater than unity (1). In the case of the arrangements intended for the synthetic fibers, these have, for example, technologically effective tooth heights of about 1 mm and a tooth separation of about 4 mm, which has shown itself as being particularly effective. The ratio, computed as above for this arrangement, runs 0.25. The technologically effective tooth heights, which are particularly advantageously put to use, lie predominately in a range between 0.3 and 1.8 mm, preferably about 1 mm.
The invention takes advantage of the fact, that the subdivision of a tooth into two or more sections, enables the accomplishment of the said purpose of the invention as mentioned in the introductory passages. Thus, the first section of the tooth, which section extends itself from apex of the tooth to the base thereof, forms that stretch of distance, to which can be attributed the especially favorable disintegration possibilities of the invented disintegration apparatus. That side of the tooth, which lies forward in the direction of movement, which side might also be called the side of confrontation, stands vertically or is slightly tilted in the forward direction. The more the forward rake is inclined forward, i.e., in the direction of motion, just that much will the forward rake increase in measurement, and just that much more the capability of disintegration of the so disposed teeth improves, for the reason, that under these circumstances, the fibers have a better chance of seizing upon the tooth structure. Contrary to conventional tooth-geometries, wherein the fibers, likewise, do adhere well, the invention also achieves the advantage, that the fibers can easily disengage themselves. Thus, the situation has been, that up to this time, apparatuses were known, wherein the fibers had the capability of dispersing themselves especially well, but this was linked to the disadvantage of the undesirable property of the fiber to subsequently agglomerate within the disintegrator. In the present case, the invention creates an aid by shaping the second section of the tooth in such a manner, that an area exists from half the tooth height down to the base thereof. This second section is thus made as an inclined slide, which declines in the direction of motion of the disintegration apparatus. This said incline, then prevents the fibers from imperviously collecting themselves at the base of the tooth, since they can now inventively slide along for release. In this manner, the disseminated fibers remain largely collected in the upper zone of the tooth and release themselves at the desired position, this being, for example, at an opening to a fiber feed channel. The disintegrating apparatus, in accord with the invention, thus combines the advantage of an especially favorable tooth geometry with the advantage of a an especially favorable releasing tooth geometry.
In the case of an especially favored embodiment of the invention, provision is made, that between the vertical tangents and the second section, an angle of 3° to 60°, preferably 30° to 50° is closed. Inclined surfaces in angular disposition have shown themselves as being especially effective in these areas. It is particularly advantageous if the teeth, in keeping with the invention, are integral with a carrier wire, which in turn is affixed on a disintegrator roll. These so toothed wires can be fabricated from long strands and at that time, be custom adapted.
A particularly favorable dimensioning is established, if the base height of the toothed wire is less than 2.5 mm. The toothed wire consists, generally, of a reasonably long wire base. This means that this wire, at the latest, upon the equipping of the disintegrator roll body, can be bent into a helical coil which is internally commensurate with the outer circumference of the roll. For instance, the said bending can be carried out during mounting or even in a preliminary step of manufacture, such as prior to a hardening process. Experience has shown that toothed wiring with a base height of less than 2.5 mm is still easily shaped, without, for example, the occurrence of fissures or breaks, which would cause extreme damage to the finished toothed wire. Especially, toothed wires with base heights in the range of 1.5 to 2.4 mm have functioned in many applications without operational problems and have given evidence of satisfactory structural strength.
For the determination of an especially functional tooth contour, advantage has been shown of satisfactory performance, when, in the case of the disintegrator apparatus, the ratio of technologically effective tooth-height to the base height lies between 0.2 and 1.5, or better, between 0.7 and 1. If one employs, for example, a technologically effective tooth-height of 1 mm and a base height of 1.8 mm, then the result provides a ratio of 0.55.
Moreover, the tooth contour has shown itself as advantageous for the capability of disintegration, when the angle of forward rake lies within a range of 0° to 10°.
In the following, the disintegrating rolls, proposed by the invention, the toothed wire and the equipping therewith, characterize themselves throughout, in that the therewith associated tooth-contour is in accord with the previously described embodiment forms. In accord therewith, for these components, the same advantages may be accorded thereto, as for the foregoing, described disintegrating apparatus.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present subject matter, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
In
Finally,
Moreover, the present invention is not limited to the above-described exemplary embodiment example. There are many more alternatives of the invention possible within the limits of the patent claims. For example, it is possible that within the disclosed value areas, a multitude of different contours can be conceived, which, all together exhibit the advantages of the invention and so fall within the scope of the invention. Beyond this, the invention is uniformly advantageous on both rings of invented toothing as well as on the described toothed wires.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2004 054 653 | Nov 2004 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2937413 | Hollingsworth | May 1960 | A |
3419941 | Moriwaki | Jan 1969 | A |
4625367 | Sole-Leris | Dec 1986 | A |
4858275 | Stahlecker et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862688 | Schmolke | Sep 1989 | A |
4953264 | Hollingsworth et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4964195 | Hollingsworth | Oct 1990 | A |
5581848 | Egerer | Dec 1996 | A |
5642611 | Stahlecker | Jul 1997 | A |
5755012 | Hollingsworth | May 1998 | A |
D445433 | Hollingsworth | Jul 2001 | S |
6336257 | Lang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
20040010890 | Maidel et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
37 23872 | Jul 1987 | DE |
10 2004 054 653 | May 2006 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060186240 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |