Disk drive employing feed-forward compensation and phase shift compensation during seek settling

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8937784
  • Patent Number
    8,937,784
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 1, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 20, 2015
    10 years ago
Abstract
A method of operating a disk drive is disclosed wherein the disk drive comprises a disk comprising a plurality of tracks, a head, and a closed loop servo system comprising a seek servo loop and a settle servo loop for actuating the head over the disk. When the head approaches a target track during a seek operation, the settle servo loop is enabled wherein a feedback control signal is generated based on a measured state of the servo system. The feedback control signal is adjusted with a feed-forward compensation. A phase shift between the measured state of the servo system and a corresponding estimated state of the servo system is compensated. The head is settled on the target track in response to the feed-forward compensation.
Description
BACKGROUND

Disk drives comprise a disk and a head connected to a distal end of an actuator arm which is rotated about a pivot by a voice coil motor (VCM) to position the head radially over the disk. The disk comprises a plurality of radially spaced, concentric tracks for recording user data sectors and servo sectors. The servo sectors comprise head positioning information (e.g., a track address) which is read by the head and processed by a servo control system to control the actuator arm as it seeks from track to track.



FIG. 1 shows a prior art disk format 2 as comprising a number of servo tracks 6 defined by servo sectors 40-4N recorded around the circumference of each data track. Each servo sector 4, comprises a preamble 8 for storing a periodic pattern, which allows proper gain adjustment and timing synchronization of the read signal, and a sync mark 10 for storing a special pattern used to symbol synchronize to a servo data field 12. The servo data field 12 stores coarse head positioning information, such as a track address, used to position the head over a target data track during a seek operation. Each servo sector 4, further comprises groups of servo bursts 14 (e.g., A, B, C and D bursts), which comprise a number of consecutive transitions recorded at precise intervals and offsets with respect to a servo track centerline. The groups of servo bursts 14 provide fine head position information used for centerline tracking while accessing a servo track during write/read operations.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a prior art disk format comprising a plurality of servo tracks defined by servo sectors.



FIG. 2A shows a disk drive according to an embodiment of the present invention comprising a head actuated over a disk.



FIG. 2B shows a closed loop servo system for actuating the head over the disk according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2C is a flow diagram according to an embodiment of the present invention wherein the servo system compensates for a phase shift between a measured and estimated servo system state.



FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein the servo system compensates for a phase shift caused by one or more notch filters by generating feed-forward compensation in response to a phase lead.



FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein a feedback control signal is generated in response to a phase lag according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5A shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein a model based feed-forward compensator operates according to a state trajectory, and the state trajectory is adjusted in response to the phase shift.



FIG. 5B illustrates different state trajectories based on a different initial state of the servo system prior to switching to a settle servo loop according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein the position error signal generated by the model based feed-forward compensator is adjusted by a phase lag in order to compensate for the phase shift between the measured and estimated servo system state.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 2A shows a disk drive comprising a head 16 actuated over a disk 18 comprising a plurality of tracks, and control 20 circuitry comprising a closed loop servo system comprising a seek servo loop and a settle servo loop (e.g., FIG. 2B). The control circuitry 20 is operable to execute the flow diagram shown in FIG. 2C, wherein the seek servo loop is used to seek the head toward a target track (block 22), and when the head approaches the target track (block 24), the control circuitry switches to the settle servo loop (block 26). A feedback control signal is generated based on a measured state of the servo system (block 28), and the feedback control signal is adjusted with a feed-forward compensation (block 30). A phase shift between the measured state of the servo system and a corresponding estimated state of the servo system is compensated (block 32), and the head is settled on the target track in response to the feed-forward compensation (block 34).


In the embodiment of FIG. 2A, a plurality of concentric servo tracks 36 are defined by embedded servo sectors 380-38N, wherein a plurality of concentric data tracks are defined relative to the servo tracks 36. The control circuitry 20 processes a read signal 40 emanating from the head 16 to demodulate the servo sectors and generate a position error signal (PES) representing an error between the actual position of the head and a target position relative to a target track. The control circuitry 20 filters the PES using a suitable compensation filter to generate a control signal 42 applied to a voice coil motor (VCM) 44 which rotates an actuator arm 46 about a pivot in order to actuate the head 16 radially over the disk 18 in a direction that reduces the PES. The servo sectors may comprise any suitable head position information, such as a track address for coarse positioning and servo bursts for fine positioning. The servo bursts may comprise any suitable pattern, such as an amplitude based servo pattern (FIG. 1) or a phase based servo pattern.



FIG. 2B shows components of a closed loop servo system for actuating the head 16 over the disk 18 according to an embodiment of the present invention. A measured position 48 of the head 16 is generated from the position information recorded in the servo sectors 380-38N, wherein the measured position 48 is subtracted from an estimated position 50 of a target trajectory to generate a position error signal (PES) 52. A feedback compensator 54 processes the PES 52 to generate a feedback control signal 56. During the settle mode of a seek operation, a feed-forward compensator 58 generates feed-forward compensation 60 and a phase shift compensator 62 adjusts the feed-forward compensation 60 to compensate for a phase shift between the measured position 48 of the head and the corresponding estimated position 50 of the head. The feedback control signal 56 is adjusted by adding the phase adjusted feed-forward compensation 64 to generate a control signal 66 applied to a head actuator 68 (such as the VCM 44 of FIG. 2A).


In one embodiment, the phase shift between the measured servo state and the corresponding estimated servo state is predetermined based on a characteristic of the servo system. FIG. 3 shows an example of this embodiment wherein the closed loop servo system comprises one or more notch filters 70 (fixed and/or adaptive) that filter the control signal 66 in order to suppress resonances of the servo system. The notch filters 70 introduce a phase lag between the estimated position 50 of the head due to the feed-forward compensation 60 and the measured position of the head 48. In one embodiment, the head actuator 68 may also exhibit a phase lag that is additive to the phase lag of the notch filters 70. In order to compensate for this phase lag in the embodiment of FIG. 3, the phase shift compensator 62 induces a phase lead into the feed-forward compensation 60.


The phase lag induced by the notch filters 70 and/or the head actuator 68 may be estimated in any suitable manner. In one embodiment, the effect of the phase shift is measured at a specific frequency Wc. For the fixed notch filter phase shift, since the notch coefficients are known in advance, the phase shift of each notch filter can be calculated for each head. Assume for head i the phase lag of all the fixed notch filters together has a phase lag θ(i,fix) at frequency Wc. For each adaptive notch filter, there are several profiles one of which is chosen depending on the process calibration for each disk drive. For the adaptive notch phase shift for head i a phase lag θ(j,k) is calculated based on the calibrated adaptive notch filter profile j for each adaptive notch k, the sum of which corresponds to the total phase lag due to all adaptive notch filters for the head:







θ

(

i
,
adaptive

)


=




j
,
k





θ

j
,
k
,
i







at





frequency







W
c

.








For the head actuator 68 phase lag, the phase shift difference among different heads can be measured over multiple drives and a phase shift value can be specified for each head i as θ(i,ac) at frequency Wc, where there may be a significant phase shift difference among inner heads and outer heads of the head stack assembly. At the beginning of each seek, the phase lag at Wc for each head i is calculated as:

θ(i)(i,ac)(i,fix)(i,adaptive)

In one embodiment, a scaled phase shift value is computed according to:







τ
i

=



θ

(
i
)



W
c


*

2

Q
lag








where τi represents a phase lag if positive and phase lead if negative. At current time t, a new phase adjusted feed-forward compensation ACT_FF 64 is computed according to:







ACT_FF

_new


(
t
)


=




τ
i

*
ACT_FF


(

t
-
1

)


+


(


2

Q
lag


-

τ
i


)

*
ACT_FF


(
t
)




2

Q
lag










if






τ
i



0









ACT_FF

_new


(
t
)


=




-

τ
i


*
ACT_FF


(

t
+
1

)


+


(


2

Q
lag


+

τ
i


)

*
ACT_FF


(
t
)




2

Q
lag















if






τ
i


<
0






FIG. 4 shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention wherein a phase shift compensator 72 induces a phase lag into the estimated position 50 of the head to compensate for the phase shift after switching to the settle servo loop. In effect, the phase shift compensator 72 shifts the target trajectory so that the estimated position 50 of the head is delayed to generate a phase shifted version 74 of the estimated position 50. Accordingly, in this embodiment the feedback control signal 56 is generated in response to the phase lag instead of adjusting the feed-forward compensation 60 with a phase lead as in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5A shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein the feed-forward compensator 58 generates an estimated state based on a model 78 of the closed loop servo system. In the embodiment of FIG. 5A, the estimated state generated by the feed-forward compensator 58 comprises an estimated position 80 of the head relative to a target track, and an estimated velocity 82 of the head. The estimated states are multiplied by respective scalars −k1 and −k2, and the results summed to generate the feed-forward compensation 84. The estimated position 80 and the estimated velocity 82 of the head are initialized based on a measured state of the servo system at the beginning of the settle operation (when the head nears the target track during a seek operation). In one embodiment, the estimated states in the feed-forward compensator 58 are initialized based on a measured position 48 of the head (derived from reading the servo sectors 380-38N) and a measured velocity of the head (e.g., based on the derivative of the measured position 48). The scalars k1 and k2 are also initialized based on the measured state of the servo system in order to initialize a state trajectory of the feed-forward compensator 58. After initializing the estimated states and the scalars, the model 78 of the closed loop servo system will generate the feed-forward compensation 84 so that the estimated states (estimated position 80 and estimated velocity 82) follow the state trajectory, thereby causing the actual states of the servo system to substantially follow the state trajectory. In the embodiment of FIG. 5A, a phase shift compensator 86 adjusts the feed-forward compensation 84 to compensate for the phase shift between the measured position 48 of the head and the estimated position 80 as described above.


In the embodiment of FIG. 5A, a virtual position error signal (V_PES) is generated based on the difference between the estimated position 80 and the measured position 48 so that the feedback compensator 54 compensates for the error between the estimated and measured states (i.e., the target trajectory in FIG. 2B is generated by the model 78 in FIG. 5A as the estimated position 80).


In the embodiment of FIG. 5A, the model 78 of the closed loop servo system comprises a second order system (a double integrator) that can be normalized and represented by the following continuous time state space equation:







[





x
1



(
t
)








x
2



(
t
)





]

=



[



0


1




0


0



]



[





x
1



(
t
)








x
2



(
t
)





]


+


[



0




1



]



u


(

k
-
1

)












y
=


[



1


0



]



[





x
1



(
t
)








x
2



(
t
)





]








y=x
1:PES;x2:VEL


The above continuous time state space equation can be transformed into a discrete-time representation:







[





x
1



(
k
)








x
2



(
k
)





]

=







1


1




0


1







[





x
1



(

k
-
1

)








x
2



(

k
-
1

)





]


+


[



0.5




1.0



]



u


(

k
-
1

)












y
=


[



1


0



]



[





x
1



(

k
-
1

)








x
2



(

k
-
1

)





]








y=x
1:PES;x2:VEL


Assuming the feedback for the above internal model is:







u


(
k
)


=

-


[




k





1




k





2




]



[





x
1



(

k
-
1

)








x
2



(

k
-
1

)





]








then the model can be rewritten as:







[





x
1



(
k
)








x
2



(
k
)





]

=


[




1
-


0.5
·
k






1





1
-


0.5
·
k






2








-
k






1




1
-

k





2





]



[





x
1



(

k
-
1

)








x
2



(

k
-
1

)





]







If the state trajectory of the feed-forward compensator 58 is a straight line approaching in the phase plane (VEL vs POS) as shown in FIG. 5B, then the above equation simplifies to k1=0, k2=R=VEL(0)/POS(0), where POS(0) represents the measured position 48 and VEL(0) represents the measured velocity of the head at the beginning of the settle operation (when the head nears the target track during a seek operation) and the scalar k2 represents the slope (R) of the straight line. As shown in FIG. 5B, the slope of the linear trajectory will vary based on the measured position and velocity at the beginning of the settle operation.


Referring again to the embodiment shown in FIG. 5A, at the beginning of the settle operation a control signal 90 closes switches 92A and 92B to enable generation of the V_PES and to enable the feed-forward compensation 88. The control signal 90 also signals block 94 to initialize the estimated states (POS_FF and VEL_FF) based on the measured states (e.g., the measured position 48 of the head) as well as initialize the scalars k1 and k2 (such as initializing k2 to establish the slope of the above-described linear trajectory).


In the embodiment of FIG. 5A, the feed-forward compensator 58 generates estimated states for the position 80 and velocity 82 of the head. In other embodiments, the feed-forward compensator 58 may generate other states, or additional states such as acceleration or jerk. The feed-forward compensator 58 may also comprise a more sophisticated model 78 and/or a more sophisticated state trajectory (other than the above-described linear trajectory).


Referring again to the above discrete-time representation of the servo system, when the state trajectory of the feed-forward compensator 58 is a straight line in the phase plane (VEL vs POS) as shown in FIG. 5B, and when the phase shift is taken into account, the above equation may be represented as:







[





x
1



(
k
)








x
2



(
k
)





]

=


[



1



1
-

p
*

R
_







0



1
-

R
_





]



[





x
1



(

k
-
1

)








x
2



(

k
-
1

)





]








u(k)=−Rx2(k−1)


where p represents the phase shift, and the phase shift p is used to modify the slope R to generated a modified slope R that accounts for the phase shift p. The approaching slope in terms of VEL and PES at each servo wedge is:






R
=



V


(

k
-
1

)



PES


(

k
-
1

)



.






The approaching slope in terms of the average VEL is:







R
_

=




V
_



(

k
-
1

)



PES


(

k
-
1

)



.






The VEL at the next servo wedge can be calculated as:

V(k)=V(k−1)−R·V(k−1)
limk→∞V(k)=V(k−1)−R·V(k−1).

The average VEL can be calculated as:

V(k)=(1−p)V(k−1)+pV(k).

From the above equations:

V(k)=V(k−1)−p RV(k−1)

and








R
_



(
k
)


=




V


(

k
-
1

)


-

p


R
_



V


(

k
-
1

)





PES


(

k
-
1

)



.






Therefore the modified slope R of the state trajectory can be calculated as:








R
_



(
k
)


=



V


(

k
-
1

)




PES


(

k
-
1

)


+

pV


(

k
-
1

)




.





In one embodiment, the phase shift p between the measured position 48 of the head and the estimated position 80 may be computed dynamically based on the measured position and the measured velocity prior to switching to the settle servo loop. Consider that:

PES(N)(1+ R)N=PES(0)

then from the above equations:








PES


(
N
)





(

1
+


V


(

k
-
1

)




PES


(

k
-
1

)


+

pV


(

k
-
1

)





)

N


=

PES


(
0
)







where PES(0) represents the PES prior to switching to the settle servo loop and PES(N) represents the PES at the end of the settle operation. Assuming that the modified slope R is fixed prior to switching to the settle servo loop, then:








PES


(
N
)





(

1
+


V


(
0
)




PES


(
0
)


+

pV


(
0
)





)

N


=

PES


(
0
)










p
=


1




PES


(
0
)



PES


(
N
)



N

-
1


-



PES


(
0
)



V


(
0
)



.







In one embodiment, the phase shift p is modified to achieve a desired settle performance within a predetermined N number of servo sectors:






p
=




1




PES


(
0
)



PES


(
N
)



N

-
1


-


PES


(
0
)



V


(
0
)






1





PES


(
0
)


_



PES


(
N
)


_


N

-
1


-



PES


(
0
)


_



V


(
0
)


_






p
_







which can be simplified by substituting:









PES


(
0
)



PES


(
N
)



N






PES


(
0
)


_



PES


(
N
)


_


N






such that:






p




delt
-


PES


(
0
)



V


(
0
)





delt
-



PES


(
0
)


_



V


(
0
)


_






p
_







where:






delt
=

1





PES


(
0
)


_



PES


(
N
)


_


N

-
1







  • p is a nominal phase shift;

  • PES(0) represents a measured position of the head prior to switching to the settle servo loop;

  • V(0) represents a measured velocity of the head prior to switching to the settle servo loop;


  • PES(0) represents a nominal position of the head prior to switching to the settle servo loop;


  • V(0) represents a nominal velocity of the head prior to switching to the settle servo loop;

  • N represents a nominal time (number of servo sectors) to settle the head on the target track; and


  • PES(N) represents a nominal position of the head at time N.


    In one embodiment, after estimating the phase shift p based on the measured position and the measured velocity prior to switching to the settle servo loop as described above, the modified slope R of the state trajectory may be calculated using the above equation in response to the estimated phase shift p.



In another embodiment of the present invention, the phase shift p may be computed based on the measured servo states after switching to the settle servo loop and while settling the head on the target track in response to the feed-forward compensation. That is, the phase shift p may be updated at each servo sector after switching to the settle servo loop. In one embodiment, the phase shift p may be estimated according to:

p(k)=T·[Vel_est(k−1)−Delta_PES(k−1)]/[Vel_est(k−1)−Vel_est(k)]

where:

  • p(k) represents the phase shift at time k;
  • PES(k) represents the measured state comprising a measured position of the head at time k;
  • Delta_PES(k)=PES(k)−PES(k−1); and
  • Vel_est(k) represents an estimated velocity of the head at time k.


In the embodiment of FIG. 5A, the phase shift compensator 86 adjusts the feed-forward compensation 84 based on a phase shift p computed dynamically as a function of the measured servo system states as described above. In another embodiment, the feed-forward compensation 84 in FIG. 5A may be further adjusted based on a predetermined phase shift, such as a predetermined phase shift caused by the notch filter(s) or the phase shift caused by the head actuator 68. In this embodiment, the phase shift p computed dynamically may compensate for an error in estimating the predetermined phase shift as well as other sources of phase shift.


The phase shift compensator 86 in the embodiment of FIG. 5A adjusts the feed-forward compensation 84 by inducing a phase lead (i.e., the phase shift p is positive). In another embodiment shown in FIG. 6, a phase shift compensator 96 may adjust the estimated position 80 of the head by inducing a phase lag (i.e., the phase shift p is negative). In both embodiments, compensating for the phase shift between the measured position of the head 48 and the corresponding estimated position 80 of the head improves performance of the feed-forward compensator 58.


Any suitable control circuitry may be employed to implement the flow diagrams in the embodiments of the present invention, such as any suitable integrated circuit or circuits. For example, the control circuitry may be implemented within a read channel integrated circuit, or in a component separate from the read channel, such as a disk controller, or certain operations described above may be performed by a read channel and others by a disk controller. In one embodiment, the read channel and disk controller are implemented as separate integrated circuits, and in an alternative embodiment they are fabricated into a single integrated circuit or system on a chip (SOC). In addition, the control circuitry may include a suitable preamp circuit implemented as a separate integrated circuit, integrated into the read channel or disk controller circuit, or integrated into a SOC.


In one embodiment, the control circuitry comprises a microprocessor executing instructions, the instructions being operable to cause the microprocessor to perform the flow diagrams described herein. The instructions may be stored in any computer-readable medium. In one embodiment, they may be stored on a non-volatile semiconductor memory external to the microprocessor, or integrated with the microprocessor in a SOC. In another embodiment, the instructions are stored on the disk and read into a volatile semiconductor memory when the disk drive is powered on. In yet another embodiment, the control circuitry comprises suitable logic circuitry, such as state machine circuitry.

Claims
  • 1. A method of operating a disk drive, the disk drive comprising a disk comprising a plurality of tracks, a head, and a closed loop servo system comprising a seek servo loop and a settle servo loop for actuating the head over the disk, the method comprising: seeking the head toward a target track using the seek servo loop; andwhen the head approaches the target track: switching to the settle servo loop;generating a feedback control signal based on a measured state of the servo system;adjusting the feedback control signal with a feed-forward compensation to generate an adjusted feedback control signal;compensating for a phase shift between the measured state of the servo system and a corresponding estimated state of the servo system; andsettling the head on the target track in response to the adjusted feedback control signal.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the measured state of the servo system comprises a measured position of the head relative to the target track.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein compensating for the phase shift comprises generating the feed-forward compensation in response to a phase lead.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein compensating for the phase shift comprises generating the feedback control signal in response to a phase lag.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the phase shift is estimated based on a characteristic of the servo system.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the characteristic of the servo system comprises a characteristic of a notch filter.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the characteristic of the servo system comprises a characteristic of an actuator operable to actuate the head over the disk.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the phase shift is estimated based on the measured state prior to switching to the settle servo loop.
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 8, further comprising estimating the phase shift according to:
  • 10. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the phase shift is estimated based on the measured state after switching to the settle servo loop and while settling the head on the target track in response to the feed-forward compensation.
  • 11. The method as recited in claim 10, further comprising estimating the phase shift according to: p(k)=T·[Vel_est(k−1)−Delta_PES(k−1)]/[Vel_est(k−1)−Vel_est(k)]where:p(k) represents the phase shift at time k;PES(k) represents the measured state comprising a measured position of the head at time k;Delta_PES(k)=PES(k)−PES(k−1); andVel_est(k) represents an estimated velocity of the head at time k.
  • 12. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: generating the feed-forward compensation based on a state trajectory; andadjusting a state trajectory in response to the phase shift.
  • 13. A disk drive comprising a disk comprising a plurality of tracks, and control circuitry comprising a closed loop servo system comprising a seek servo loop and a settle servo loop for actuating a head over the disk, the control circuitry operable to: seek the head toward a target track using the seek servo loop; andwhen the head approaches the target track: switch to the settle servo loop;generate a feedback control signal based on a measured state of the servo system;adjust the feedback control signal with a feed-forward compensation to generate an adjusted feedback control signal;compensate for a phase shift between the measured state of the servo system and a corresponding estimated state of the servo system; andsettle the head on the target track in response to the adjusted feedback control signal.
  • 14. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the measured state of the servo system comprises a measured position of the head relative to the target track.
  • 15. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the control circuitry is operable to compensate for the phase shift by generating the feed-forward compensation in response to a phase lead.
  • 16. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the control circuitry is operable to compensate for the phase shift by generating the feedback control signal in response to a phase lag.
  • 17. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the control circuitry is operable to estimate the phase shift based on a characteristic of the servo system.
  • 18. The disk drive as recited in claim 17, wherein the characteristic of the servo system comprises a characteristic of a notch filter.
  • 19. The disk drive as recited in claim 17, wherein the characteristic of the servo system comprises a characteristic of an actuator operable to actuate the head over the disk.
  • 20. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the control circuitry is operable to estimate the phase shift based on the measured state prior to switching to the settle servo loop.
  • 21. The disk drive as recited in claim 20, wherein the control circuitry is operable to estimate the phase shift according to:
  • 22. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the control circuitry is operable to estimate the phase shift based on the measured state after switching to the settle servo loop and while settling the head on the target track in response to the feed-forward compensation.
  • 23. The disk drive as recited in claim 22, wherein the control circuitry is operable to estimate the phase shift according to: p(k)=T·[Vel_est(k−1)−Delta_PES(k−1)]/[Vel_est(k−1)−Vel_est(k)]where:p(k) represents the phase shift at time k;PES(k) represents the measured state comprising a measured position of the head at time k;Delta_PES(k)=PES(k)−PES(k−1); andVel_est(k) represents an estimated velocity of the head at time k.
  • 24. The disk drive as recited in claim 13, wherein the control circuitry is further operable to: generate the feed-forward compensation based on a state trajectory; andadjust a state trajectory in response to the phase shift.
US Referenced Citations (343)
Number Name Date Kind
5793558 Codilian et al. Aug 1998 A
6013995 Kim Jan 2000 A
6014283 Codilian et al. Jan 2000 A
6031684 Gregg Feb 2000 A
6052076 Patton, III et al. Apr 2000 A
6052250 Golowka et al. Apr 2000 A
6067206 Hull et al. May 2000 A
6078453 Dziallo et al. Jun 2000 A
6091564 Codilian et al. Jul 2000 A
6094020 Goretzki et al. Jul 2000 A
6101065 Alfred et al. Aug 2000 A
6104153 Codilian et al. Aug 2000 A
6122133 Nazarian et al. Sep 2000 A
6122135 Stich Sep 2000 A
6141175 Nazarian et al. Oct 2000 A
6160368 Plutowski Dec 2000 A
6181502 Hussein et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195222 Heminger et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198584 Codilian et al. Mar 2001 B1
6198590 Codilian et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204988 Codilian et al. Mar 2001 B1
6243223 Elliott et al. Jun 2001 B1
6281652 Ryan et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285521 Hussein Sep 2001 B1
6292320 Mason et al. Sep 2001 B1
6310742 Nazarian et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320718 Bouwkamp et al. Nov 2001 B1
6342984 Hussein et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347018 Kadlec et al. Feb 2002 B1
6369972 Codilian et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369974 Asgari et al. Apr 2002 B1
6462896 Codilian et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476996 Ryan Nov 2002 B1
6484577 Bennett Nov 2002 B1
6490120 Burton et al. Dec 2002 B1
6493169 Ferris et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496324 Golowka et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498698 Golowka et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501613 Shih Dec 2002 B1
6504670 Dittmar Jan 2003 B1
6507450 Elliott Jan 2003 B1
6510016 Hattori Jan 2003 B1
6534936 Messenger et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538839 Ryan Mar 2003 B1
6545835 Codilian et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549359 Bennett et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549361 Bennett et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560056 Ryan May 2003 B1
6563663 Bi et al. May 2003 B1
6568268 Bennett May 2003 B1
6574062 Bennett et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577465 Bennett et al. Jun 2003 B1
6614615 Ju et al. Sep 2003 B1
6614618 Sheh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636377 Yu et al. Oct 2003 B1
6686716 Predina et al. Feb 2004 B1
6690536 Ryan Feb 2004 B1
6693764 Sheh et al. Feb 2004 B1
6707635 Codilian et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710953 Vallis et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710966 Codilian et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714371 Codilian Mar 2004 B1
6714372 Codilian et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724564 Codilian et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731450 Codilian et al. May 2004 B1
6735041 Codilian et al. May 2004 B1
6738220 Codilian May 2004 B1
6747837 Bennett Jun 2004 B1
6760186 Codilian et al. Jul 2004 B1
6781787 Codilian et al. Aug 2004 B1
6788483 Ferris et al. Sep 2004 B1
6791785 Messenger et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795268 Ryan Sep 2004 B1
6819518 Melkote et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826006 Melkote et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826007 Patton, III Nov 2004 B1
6847502 Codilian Jan 2005 B1
6850383 Bennett Feb 2005 B1
6850384 Bennett Feb 2005 B1
6867944 Ryan Mar 2005 B1
6876508 Patton, III et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882496 Codilian et al. Apr 2005 B1
6885514 Codilian et al. Apr 2005 B1
6900958 Yi et al. May 2005 B1
6900959 Gardner et al. May 2005 B1
6903897 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6914740 Tu et al. Jul 2005 B1
6914743 Narayana et al. Jul 2005 B1
6920004 Codilian et al. Jul 2005 B1
6924959 Melkote et al. Aug 2005 B1
6924960 Melkote et al. Aug 2005 B1
6924961 Melkote et al. Aug 2005 B1
6934114 Codilian et al. Aug 2005 B1
6934135 Ryan Aug 2005 B1
6937420 McNab et al. Aug 2005 B1
6937423 Ngo et al. Aug 2005 B1
6952322 Codilian et al. Oct 2005 B1
6954324 Tu et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958881 Codilian et al. Oct 2005 B1
6963465 Melkote et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965488 Bennett Nov 2005 B1
6967458 Bennett et al. Nov 2005 B1
6967811 Codilian et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970319 Bennett et al. Nov 2005 B1
6972539 Codilian et al. Dec 2005 B1
6972540 Wang et al. Dec 2005 B1
6972922 Subrahmanyam et al. Dec 2005 B1
6975480 Codilian et al. Dec 2005 B1
6977789 Cloke Dec 2005 B1
6980389 Kupferman Dec 2005 B1
6987636 Chue et al. Jan 2006 B1
6987639 Yu Jan 2006 B1
6989954 Lee et al. Jan 2006 B1
6992848 Agarwal et al. Jan 2006 B1
6992851 Cloke Jan 2006 B1
6992852 Ying et al. Jan 2006 B1
6995941 Miyamura et al. Feb 2006 B1
6999263 Melkote et al. Feb 2006 B1
6999267 Melkote et al. Feb 2006 B1
7006320 Bennett et al. Feb 2006 B1
7016134 Agarwal et al. Mar 2006 B1
7023637 Kupferman Apr 2006 B1
7023640 Codilian et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027256 Subrahmanyam et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027257 Kupferman Apr 2006 B1
7035026 Codilian et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046472 Melkote et al. May 2006 B1
7050249 Chue et al. May 2006 B1
7050254 Yu et al. May 2006 B1
7050258 Codilian May 2006 B1
7054098 Yu et al. May 2006 B1
7061714 Yu Jun 2006 B1
7064918 Codilian et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068451 Wang et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068459 Cloke et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068461 Chue et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068463 Ji et al. Jun 2006 B1
7088547 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B1
7095579 Ryan et al. Aug 2006 B1
7110208 Miyamura et al. Sep 2006 B1
7110214 Tu et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113362 Lee et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113365 Ryan et al. Sep 2006 B1
7116505 Kupferman Oct 2006 B1
7126781 Bennett Oct 2006 B1
7158329 Ryan Jan 2007 B1
7170581 Tousain Jan 2007 B2
7180703 Subrahmanyam et al. Feb 2007 B1
7184230 Chue et al. Feb 2007 B1
7196864 Yi et al. Mar 2007 B1
7199966 Tu et al. Apr 2007 B1
7203021 Ryan et al. Apr 2007 B1
7206162 Semba et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209321 Bennett Apr 2007 B1
7212364 Lee May 2007 B1
7212374 Wang et al May 2007 B1
7215504 Bennett May 2007 B1
7224546 Orakcilar et al. May 2007 B1
7248426 Weerasooriya et al. Jul 2007 B1
7251098 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B1
7253582 Ding et al. Aug 2007 B1
7253989 Lau et al. Aug 2007 B1
7265933 Phan et al. Sep 2007 B1
7289288 Tu Oct 2007 B1
7298574 Melkote et al. Nov 2007 B1
7301717 Lee et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304819 Melkote et al. Dec 2007 B1
7330019 Bennett Feb 2008 B1
7330327 Chue et al. Feb 2008 B1
7333280 Lifchits et al. Feb 2008 B1
7333290 Kupferman Feb 2008 B1
7339761 Tu et al. Mar 2008 B1
7365932 Bennett Apr 2008 B1
7388728 Chen et al. Jun 2008 B1
7391583 Sheh et al. Jun 2008 B1
7391584 Sheh et al. Jun 2008 B1
7394614 Kang Jul 2008 B2
7433143 Ying et al. Oct 2008 B1
7440210 Lee Oct 2008 B1
7440225 Chen et al. Oct 2008 B1
7450334 Wang et al. Nov 2008 B1
7450336 Wang et al. Nov 2008 B1
7453661 Jang et al. Nov 2008 B1
7457071 Sheh Nov 2008 B1
7466509 Chen et al. Dec 2008 B1
7468855 Weerasooriya et al. Dec 2008 B1
7477471 Nemshick et al. Jan 2009 B1
7480116 Bennett Jan 2009 B1
7489464 McNab et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492546 Miyamura Feb 2009 B1
7495857 Bennett Feb 2009 B1
7499236 Lee et al. Mar 2009 B1
7502192 Wang et al. Mar 2009 B1
7502195 Wu et al. Mar 2009 B1
7502197 Chue Mar 2009 B1
7505223 McCornack Mar 2009 B1
7542225 Ding et al. Jun 2009 B1
7548392 Desai et al. Jun 2009 B1
7551390 Wang et al. Jun 2009 B1
7558016 Le et al. Jul 2009 B1
7573670 Ryan et al. Aug 2009 B1
7576941 Chen et al. Aug 2009 B1
7580212 Li et al. Aug 2009 B1
7583470 Chen et al. Sep 2009 B1
7595954 Chen et al. Sep 2009 B1
7602575 Lifchits et al. Oct 2009 B1
7616399 Chen et al. Nov 2009 B1
7619844 Bennett Nov 2009 B1
7626782 Yu et al. Dec 2009 B1
7630162 Zhao et al. Dec 2009 B2
7639447 Yu et al. Dec 2009 B1
7656604 Liang et al. Feb 2010 B1
7656607 Bennett Feb 2010 B1
7660067 Ji et al. Feb 2010 B1
7663835 Yu et al. Feb 2010 B1
7675707 Liu et al. Mar 2010 B1
7679854 Narayana et al. Mar 2010 B1
7688534 McCornack Mar 2010 B1
7688538 Chen et al. Mar 2010 B1
7688539 Bryant et al. Mar 2010 B1
7697233 Bennett et al. Apr 2010 B1
7701661 Bennett Apr 2010 B1
7710676 Chue May 2010 B1
7715138 Kupferman May 2010 B1
7729079 Huber Jun 2010 B1
7733189 Bennett Jun 2010 B1
7746592 Liang et al. Jun 2010 B1
7746594 Guo et al. Jun 2010 B1
7746595 Guo et al. Jun 2010 B1
7760461 Bennett Jul 2010 B1
7800853 Guo et al. Sep 2010 B1
7800856 Bennett et al. Sep 2010 B1
7800857 Calaway et al. Sep 2010 B1
7839591 Weerasooriya et al. Nov 2010 B1
7839595 Chue et al. Nov 2010 B1
7839600 Babinski et al. Nov 2010 B1
7843662 Weerasooriya et al. Nov 2010 B1
7852588 Ferris et al. Dec 2010 B1
7852592 Liang et al. Dec 2010 B1
7864481 Kon et al. Jan 2011 B1
7864482 Babinski et al. Jan 2011 B1
7869155 Wong Jan 2011 B1
7876522 Calaway et al. Jan 2011 B1
7876523 Panyavoravaj et al. Jan 2011 B1
7916415 Chue Mar 2011 B1
7916416 Guo et al. Mar 2011 B1
7916420 McFadyen et al. Mar 2011 B1
7916422 Guo et al. Mar 2011 B1
7929238 Vasquez Apr 2011 B1
7961422 Chen et al. Jun 2011 B1
8000053 Anderson Aug 2011 B1
8031423 Tsai et al. Oct 2011 B1
8054022 Ryan et al. Nov 2011 B1
8059357 Knigge et al. Nov 2011 B1
8059360 Melkote et al. Nov 2011 B1
8072703 Calaway et al. Dec 2011 B1
8077428 Chen et al. Dec 2011 B1
8078901 Meyer et al. Dec 2011 B1
8081395 Ferris Dec 2011 B1
8085020 Bennett Dec 2011 B1
8116023 Kupferman Feb 2012 B1
8145934 Ferris et al. Mar 2012 B1
8179626 Ryan et al. May 2012 B1
8189286 Chen et al. May 2012 B1
8213106 Guo et al. Jul 2012 B1
8254222 Tang Aug 2012 B1
8300348 Liu et al. Oct 2012 B1
8315005 Zou et al. Nov 2012 B1
8320069 Knigge et al. Nov 2012 B1
8351174 Gardner et al. Jan 2013 B1
8358114 Ferris et al. Jan 2013 B1
8358145 Ferris et al. Jan 2013 B1
8390367 Bennett Mar 2013 B1
8432031 Agness et al. Apr 2013 B1
8432629 Rigney et al. Apr 2013 B1
8451697 Rigney et al. May 2013 B1
8482873 Chue et al. Jul 2013 B1
8498076 Sheh et al. Jul 2013 B1
8498172 Patton, III et al. Jul 2013 B1
8508881 Babinski et al. Aug 2013 B1
8531798 Xi et al. Sep 2013 B1
8537486 Liang et al. Sep 2013 B2
8542455 Huang et al. Sep 2013 B2
8553351 Narayana et al. Oct 2013 B1
8564899 Lou et al. Oct 2013 B2
8576506 Wang et al. Nov 2013 B1
8605382 Mallary et al. Dec 2013 B1
8605384 Liu et al. Dec 2013 B1
8610391 Yang et al. Dec 2013 B1
8611040 Xi et al. Dec 2013 B1
8619385 Guo et al. Dec 2013 B1
8630054 Bennett et al. Jan 2014 B2
8630059 Chen et al. Jan 2014 B1
8634154 Rigney et al. Jan 2014 B1
8634283 Rigney et al. Jan 2014 B1
8643976 Wang et al. Feb 2014 B1
8649121 Smith et al. Feb 2014 B1
8654466 McFadyen Feb 2014 B1
8654467 Wong et al. Feb 2014 B1
8665546 Zhao et al. Mar 2014 B1
8665551 Rigney et al. Mar 2014 B1
8670206 Liang et al. Mar 2014 B1
8687312 Liang Apr 2014 B1
8693123 Guo et al. Apr 2014 B1
8693134 Xi et al. Apr 2014 B1
8699173 Kang et al. Apr 2014 B1
8711027 Bennett Apr 2014 B1
8717696 Ryan et al. May 2014 B1
8717699 Ferris May 2014 B1
8717704 Yu et al. May 2014 B1
8724245 Smith et al. May 2014 B1
8724253 Liang et al. May 2014 B1
8724524 Urabe et al. May 2014 B2
8737008 Watanabe et al. May 2014 B1
8737013 Zhou et al. May 2014 B2
8743495 Chen et al. Jun 2014 B1
8743503 Tang et al. Jun 2014 B1
8743504 Bryant et al. Jun 2014 B1
8749904 Liang et al. Jun 2014 B1
8760796 Lou et al. Jun 2014 B1
8767332 Chahwan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8767343 Helmick et al. Jul 2014 B1
8767354 Ferris et al. Jul 2014 B1
8773787 Beker Jul 2014 B1
8779574 Agness et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780473 Zhao et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780477 Guo et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780479 Helmick et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780489 Gayaka et al. Jul 2014 B1
8792202 Wan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8797664 Guo et al. Aug 2014 B1
8804267 Huang et al. Aug 2014 B2
20020006010 Ding et al. Jan 2002 A1
20030058571 Kisaka Mar 2003 A1
20040036999 Chrappan Soldavini et al. Feb 2004 A1
20060007592 Takaishi et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060082922 Shih Apr 2006 A1
20100035085 Jung et al. Feb 2010 A1
20120284493 Lou et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130120870 Zhou et al. May 2013 A1
20130148240 Ferris et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130229135 Long et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130231891 Long et al. Sep 2013 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Yang Quan Chen, Kevin L. Moore, Jie Yu, Tao Zhang, “Iterative Learning Control and Repetitive Control in Hard Disk Drive Industry—A Tutorial”, Proceedings 2006 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, Dec. 2006, 14 pages.
Mingxuan Sun, Danwei Wang, “Closed-loop iterative learning control for non-linear systems with initial shifts”, International Journal of Adaptive Control Signal Process, 16 (7), 2002, 515-538, 24 pages, Feb. 14, 2002.
Douglas A. Bristow, Marina Tharayil, Andrew G. Alleyne, “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control a learning-based method for high-performance tracking control”, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2006, vol. 26: pp. 96-114, 19 pages, Jun. 2006.
F. L. Lewis, M. A. Christodoulou, B. G. Mertzois, “System Inversion using Orthogonal Functions*”, Circuits Systems Signal Process, vol. 6, No. 3, 1987, 16 pages, Jan. 17, 1987.
Mingji Lou, et. al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/492,449, filed Jun. 8, 2012, 22 pages.