The typical hard disk drive includes a head disk assembly (HDA) and a printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) attached to a disk drive base of the HDA. The HDA includes at least one disk (such as a magnetic disk, magneto-optical disk, or optical disk), a spindle motor for rotating the disk, and a head stack assembly (HSA). The PCBA includes electronics and firmware for controlling the rotation of the spindle motor and for controlling the position of the HSA, and for providing a data transfer channel between the disk drive and its host.
The spindle motor typically includes a rotor including one or more rotor magnets and a rotating hub on which disks are mounted and clamped, and a stator. If more than one disk is mounted on the hub, the disks are typically separated by spacer rings that are mounted on the hub between the disks. Various coils of the stator are selectively energized to form an electromagnetic field that pulls/pushes on the rotor magnet(s), thereby rotating the hub. Rotation of the spindle motor hub results in rotation of the mounted disks.
The HSA typically includes an actuator, at least one head gimbal assembly (HGA), and a flex cable assembly. During operation of the disk drive, the actuator rotates to position the HGAs adjacent desired information tracks on the disk. The actuator typically includes a pivot-bearing cartridge to facilitate such rotational positioning. The pivot-bearing cartridge typically fits into a bore in the body of the actuator. One or more actuator arms extend from the actuator body. An actuator coil is supported by the actuator body, and is disposed opposite the actuator arms. The actuator coil is configured to interact with one or more fixed magnets in the HDA, to form a voice coil motor. The PCBA provides and controls an electrical current that passes through the actuator coil and results in a torque being applied to the actuator.
Each HGA includes a head for reading and writing data from and to the disk. In magnetic recording applications, the head typically includes a slider and a magnetic transducer that comprises a writer and a read element. In optical recording applications, the head may include a minor and an objective lens for focusing laser light on to an adjacent disk surface. The slider is separated from the disk by a gas lubrication film that is typically referred to as an “air bearing.” The term “air bearing” is common because typically the lubricant gas is simply air. However, air bearing sliders have been designed for use in disk drive enclosures that contain helium, because an inert gas may not degrade lubricants and protective carbon films as quickly as does oxygen. Helium may also be used, for example, because it has higher thermal conductivity than air, and therefore may improve disk drive cooling. Also, because the air bearing thickness depends on the gas viscosity and density, the air bearing thickness may be advantageously reduced in helium relative to air (all other conditions being the same). Furthermore, because helium has lower density than air, its flow (e.g. flow that is induced by disk rotation) may not buffet components within the disk drive as much, which may reduce track misregistration and thereby improve track following capability—facilitating higher data storage densities.
Disk drive enclosures disclosed in the art to contain helium are typically hermetically sealed to prevent an unacceptable rate of helium leakage. Although some negligible amount of helium leakage is unavoidable, a non-negligible amount of helium leakage is undesirable because it can alter the thickness of the gas lubrication film between the head and the disk, and thereby affect the performance of the head. A non-negligible amount of helium leakage is also undesirable because it can alter the tribochemistry of the head disk interface, possibly leading to degradation in reliability, head crashes, and associated data loss.
Various methods and structures that have been disclosed in the past to hermetically seal disk drive enclosures have been too costly, have required too much change to existing disk drive manufacturing processes, and/or were not able to retain helium internal to the disk drive enclosure for sufficient time to ensure adequate product reliability. Some relatively successful methods and structures for sealing 3.5 inch form-factor disk drives may not be practical or feasible for sealing smaller form-factor disk drives, such as 2.5 inch form-factor disk drives. Thus, there is a need in the art for disk drive enclosure sealing methods and structures that may be practically implemented in a high volume and low cost disk drive manufacturing process, and that can retain helium internal to a small form-factor disk drive enclosure for a sufficient period of time to ensure adequate post-manufacture product reliability and lifetime.
In the embodiment of
Although in the view of
In certain embodiments, such folding is done to enable the disk drive to achieve (or fit within) desired standard external dimensions, also known as a standard disk drive “form factor.” Standard disk drive form factors include the so-called “3.5 inch” (101.6 mm×25.4 mm×146 mm), “2.5 inch” (69.85 mm×7-15 mm×100 mm), and “1.8 inch” (54 mm×8 mm×71 mm) standard disk drive form factors. When the disk drive form factor is smaller than the so-called “3.5 inch” standard disk drive form factor, then the aforedescribed folding over the top cover may be additionally advantageous, because the height of the disk drive side walls 106 may be less than the diffusion length of helium gas through the adhesive layer in that case.
In the embodiment of
Still, the disk drive 300 may be considered helium-filled, and/or to enclose helium, throughout its useful life so long as it continues to enclose a substantial concentration of helium gas. Note also that 1.0 atmosphere pressure of helium is not required for the disk drive 300 to be considered to enclose helium and/or be helium-filled. For example, the helium-filled disk drive enclosure preferably initially encloses helium having between 0.3 to 1.0 atmosphere partial pressure, and may also enclose air having between 0 to 0.7 atmosphere partial pressure. In certain applications, it may be desirable for at least 70% of the helium gas that is initially enclosed to remain enclosed after a 10 year useful life of the disk drive.
In certain embodiments, the top seal 120 is adhered to the peripheral flange 110 along the entire length of all four side walls 106 by a continuous adhesive layer that preferably has an adhesive layer thickness in the range 5 to 50 microns and preferably has a minimum lateral adhesive layer extent (measured parallel to the major surface of the disk 304) that is not less than 8 mm. In this context, the “minimum lateral adhesive layer extent” is the sum of the adhesive layer extent going outwards parallel to the major surface of the disk 304, plus the adhesive layer extent going backwards (because of the fold) parallel to the major surface 304, so that it represents the total minimum distance that a leaking helium molecule would have to travel (measured parallel to the major surface of the disk 304) to pass completely through the adhesive layer from inside the enclosure of disk drive 300 to outside the enclosure of disk drive 300.
In the embodiment of
Alternatively, the top cover label 520 may comprise a polymer backing layer and a metal film deposited on the polymer backing layer, with the metal film having a metal film thickness in the range 0.1 to 5 microns. The top cover label 520 may include a thermal set epoxy adhesive or an acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive, for example. Such adhesive may have a thickness in the range 5 to 50 microns. Alternatively, the top cover label 520 may include two overlapping layers of continuous metal foil, so that any small pores or imperfections that exist in one of the continuous metal foil layers will be unlikely to be aligned with any small pores or imperfections in the other (overlapping) one of the continuous metal foil layers.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In the foregoing specification, the invention is described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, but those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to those. It is contemplated that various features and aspects of the invention may be used individually or jointly and possibly in a different environment or application. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded as illustrative and exemplary rather than restrictive. For example, the word “preferably,” and the phrase “preferably but not necessarily,” are used synonymously herein to consistently include the meaning of “not necessarily” or optionally. “Comprising,” “including,” and “having,” are intended to be open-ended terms.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5097978 | Eckerd | Mar 1992 | A |
5270887 | Edwards et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276577 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5454157 | Ananth et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5600509 | Kawakami | Feb 1997 | A |
5646801 | Boigenzahn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
6185807 | Kazmierczak et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6266207 | Iwahara et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6347021 | Kazmierczak et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6392838 | Hearn et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6525899 | Hearn et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6556372 | Hearn et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6631049 | Satoh et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6721128 | Koizumi et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6822823 | Tsuwako et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6903898 | Nonaka et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6970322 | Bernett | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6989493 | Hipwell, Jr. et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7016145 | Gunderson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7019942 | Gunderson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7123440 | Albrecht et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7355811 | Gifford et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7365937 | Gunderson | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7434987 | Gustafson et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7518859 | Kobayashi | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7522375 | Tsuda et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7599147 | Gunderson | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8194348 | Jacoby et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010044023 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030081348 | Watanabe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030179489 | Bernett et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20050068666 | Albrecht et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050184463 | Boutaghou et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050253343 | Hampton | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002005 | Miyazaki et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034010 | Abe et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070035872 | Hayakawa et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070183085 | Hatchett et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263319 | Calderon et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278909 | Xu et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007866 | Hayakawa et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080068745 | Uefune et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088969 | Uefune et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080165448 | Ichikawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080165449 | Shindo et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080247082 | Kavosh et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090097163 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102131 | Gunderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090168233 | Kouno et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241322 | Uefune et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110051287 | Tokunaga | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110211279 | Jacoby et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |