Disk drive selecting disturbance signal for feed-forward compensation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8953278
  • Patent Number
    8,953,278
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 15, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 10, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A disk drive is disclosed comprising a disk, a head, and control circuitry comprising a servo control system operable to actuate the head over the disk. A plurality of disturbance signals is generated in response to a vibration. A plurality of correlations is generated in response to each disturbance signal and an error signal of the servo control system. At least one of the disturbance signals is selected in response to the correlations. A feed-forward compensation value is generated in response to the selected disturbance signal, and the feed-forward compensation value is applied to the servo control system to compensate for the vibration.
Description
BACKGROUND

Disk drives comprise a disk and a head connected to a distal end of an actuator arm which is rotated about a pivot by a voice coil motor (VCM) to position the head radially over the disk. The disk comprises a plurality of radially spaced, concentric tracks for recording user data sectors and embedded servo sectors. The embedded servo sectors comprise head positioning information (e.g., a track address) which is read by the head and processed by a VCM servo controller to control the velocity of the actuator arm as it seeks from track to track.



FIG. 1 shows a prior art disk format 2 comprising a number of servo tracks 4 defined by concentric servo sectors 60-6N recorded around the circumference of each servo track, wherein data tracks are defined relative to the servo tracks 4. Each servo sector 6, comprises a preamble 8 for storing a periodic pattern, which allows proper gain adjustment and timing synchronization of the read signal, and a sync mark 10 for storing a special pattern used to synchronize to a servo data field 12. The servo data field 12 stores coarse head positioning information, such as a servo track address, used to position the head over a target data track during a seek operation. Each servo sector 6, further comprises groups of servo bursts 14 (e.g., A, B, C and D bursts), which comprise a number of consecutive transitions recorded at precise intervals and offsets with respect to a data track centerline. The groups of servo bursts 14 provide fine head position information used for centerline tracking while accessing a data track during write/read operations.


An air bearing forms between the head and the disk due to the disk rotating at high speeds. Since the quality of the write/read signal depends on the fly height of the head, conventional heads (e.g., a magnetoresistive heads) may comprise an actuator for controlling the fly height. Any suitable fly height actuator may be employed, such as a heater which controls fly height through thermal expansion, or a piezoelectric (PZT) actuator. A dynamic fly height (DFH) servo controller may measure the fly height of the head and adjust the fly height actuator to maintain a target fly height during write/read operations.


Certain conditions may affect the ability of the VCM servo controller to maintain the head along the centerline of a target data track and/or the ability of the DFH servo controller to maintain the target fly height. For example, an external vibration applied to the disk drive or degradation and/or malfunction of the spindle motor that rotates the disks may induce a disturbance in the servo control systems. The degradation caused by such a disturbance may be ameliorated using a feed-forward compensation algorithm.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a prior art disk format comprising a plurality of servo tracks defined by embedded servo sectors.



FIG. 2A shows a disk drive according to an embodiment of the present invention comprising a head actuated over a disk by a servo control system.



FIG. 2B is a flow diagram according to an embodiment of the present invention wherein a plurality of disturbance signals are correlated with an error signal in order to select at least one disturbance signal for feed-forward compensation.



FIG. 3A shows a servo control system according to an embodiment of the present invention including feed-forward compensation generated from a selected disturbance signal.



FIG. 3B shows a servo control system according to an embodiment of the present invention including feed-forward compensation generated from a plurality of selected disturbance signals.



FIG. 4 shows an equation for correlating a disturbance signal with the error signal according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is a flow diagram according to an embodiment of the present invention wherein at least one of a gain and phase of at least one of the disturbance signal and the error signal is adjusted prior to computing the correlation.



FIG. 6A shows an embodiment of the present invention for generating the feed-forward compensation values from a selected disturbance signal.



FIG. 6B shows an embodiment of the present invention for generating the feed-forward compensation values from a plurality of selected disturbance signals.



FIG. 7A shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein the disturbance signal selection is based on a residual error after performing feed-forward compensation of the servo control system.



FIG. 7B shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein the disturbance signal selection is based on a residual error after performing feed-forward compensation of a model of at least part of the servo control system.



FIG. 8 shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein a disturbance observer generates the error signal of the servo control system that is used to select the optimal disturbance signal(s) for feed-forward compensation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION


FIG. 2A shows a disk drive according to an embodiment of the present invention comprising a disk 16, a head 18, and control circuitry 20 comprising a servo control system operable to actuate the head 18 over the disk 16. The control circuitry 20 executes the flow diagram of FIG. 2B, wherein a plurality of disturbance signals is generated in response to a vibration (step 22). A plurality of correlations is generated in response to each disturbance signal and an error signal of the servo control system (step 24). At least one of the disturbance signals is selected in response to the correlations (step 26). A feed-forward compensation value is generated in response to the selected disturbance signal (step 28), and the feed-forward compensation value is applied to the servo control system to compensate for the vibration (step 30).


In the embodiment of FIG. 2A, the disk 16 comprises embedded servo sectors 320-32N that define a plurality of servo tracks 34. The control circuitry 20 processes a read signal 36 emanating from the head 18 to demodulate the servo sectors 320-32N and generate a position error signal (PES) representing an error between the actual position of the head and a target position relative to a target track. The control circuitry 20 filters the PES using a suitable compensation filter to generate a control signal 38 applied to a voice coil motor (VCM) 40 which rotates an actuator arm 42 about a pivot in order to actuate the head 18 radially over the disk in a direction that reduces the PES. The servo sectors 320-32N may comprise any suitable position information, such as a track address for coarse positioning and servo bursts for fine positioning. The servo bursts may comprise any suitable pattern, such as the amplitude-based servo pattern shown in FIG. 1, or a suitable phase-based servo pattern.


In one embodiment, the disk drive comprises a suitable microactuator, such as a suitable piezoelectric actuator, for actuating the head 18 in fine movements radially over the disk 16. The microactuator may be implemented in any suitable manner, such as a microactuator that actuates a suspension relative to the actuator arm 42, or a microactuator that actuates a head gimbal relative to the suspension. In one embodiment, feed-forward compensation values may be generated in response to a selected disturbance signal for use in the microactuator servo control system in addition to, or instead of, generating feed-forward compensation values for the VCM servo control system.


In one embodiment, the head 18 may comprise a suitable fly height actuator, such as a heater or a piezoelectric actuator, operable to actuate the head vertically over the disk in order to maintain a target fly height. The control circuitry 20 may comprise a servo control system operable to compare a measured fly height to a target fly height to generate a fly height error used to generate a dynamic fly height (DFH) control signal 44 (FIG. 2A) similar to the servo control system that controls the radial position of the head. In one embodiment, feed-forward compensation values are generated in response to a selected disturbance signal for use in the fly height servo control system.


An external vibration applied to the disk drive or degradation and/or malfunction of the spindle motor that rotates the disks may induce a disturbance in one or more of the servo control systems that actuate the head over the disk (radially or vertically). Using a suitable sensor a disturbance signal can be generated that represents the disturbance; however, since the disturbance may be caused by a number of different sources, in embodiments of the present invention a number of sensors are employed each corresponding to a possible source of vibration. The disturbance signals generated by the sensors are evaluated in order to select the optimal disturbance signal(s), that is, the disturbance signal(s) that best represent(s) the actual vibration. In the embodiment of FIG. 2B, the disturbance signal having the best correlation with an error signal in the servo control system is selected to generate the feed-forward compensation values. In other embodiments described below with reference to FIGS. 7A and 7B, the disturbance signal that generates a smallest residual error (after feed-forward compensation) is selected to generate the feed-forward compensation values applied to the actual servo control system.



FIG. 3A shows a servo control system according to an embodiment of the present invention, including to select a disturbance signal based on a correlation with an error signal in the servo control system. A suitable actuator 46 (radial or vertical) actuates the head 18 over the disk 16 in response to an actuator control signal 48. An estimated position 50 of the head 18 is subtracted from a reference position 52 to generate an error signal 54. A suitable compensator 56 processes the error signal 54 to generate a control signal 58 that is combined with a feed-forward compensation value 60 to generate the actuator control signal 48. A plurality of correlators 621-62N correlate the error signal 54 with respective disturbance signals 641-64N. A selector 66 applies the disturbance signal 64i that best correlates with the error signal 54 to a feed-forward algorithm 68 that generates the feed-forward compensation values 60 that compensate for the vibration disturbing the servo control system.


Any suitable sensor may be used to generate the disturbance signals 641-64N in the embodiments of the present invention, including an electronic sensor and/or a sensor implemented in firmware. FIG. 3B shows an embodiment wherein the sensors include a first electrical sensor 701 (e.g., an accelerometer) for generating a first disturbance signal 641 representing a linear vibration, and a second electrical sensor 702 for generating a second disturbance signal 642 representing a rotational vibration. Also in this embodiment a firmware sensor 70N generates a disturbance signal 64N, for example, in response to the read signal 36 emanating from the head, or in response to a back electromotive force (BEMF) signal generated by the VCM 40 or a spindle motor that rotates the disk 16, or in response to any other suitable signal that may affect the servo control system(s).



FIG. 3B also illustrates an embodiment wherein the selector 66 may apply a plurality of the disturbance signals (M disturbance signals) to the feed-forward algorithm for generating the feed-forward compensation values 60. For example, the selector 66 may select the best M out of the N disturbance signals, or the M disturbance signals that satisfy a selection criteria (e.g., exceed a threshold).


Any suitable algorithm may be employed by the correlators 621-62N to correlate the disturbance signals 641-64N with the error signal 54. FIG. 4 shows an example correlation algorithm where e represents the error signal and x represents the disturbance signal. Other embodiments may employ a different algorithm to compute the correlation, such as computing a Euclidean Distance between the error signal and the disturbance signals.


In an embodiment illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG. 5, the gain of at least one of each disturbance signal and the error signal may be adjusted (step 72) prior to performing the correlation (step 24). In one embodiment, the gain may be adjusted to a number of different values for each disturbance signal and the corresponding correlation computed. Also in the embodiment of FIG. 5, the phase of at least one of each disturbance signal and the error signal may be adjusted (step 72) prior to performing the correlation (step 24). For example, the phase may be adjusted to a number of different values for each disturbance signal and the corresponding correlation computed. The disturbance signal(s) that best correlates with the error signal at each of the amplitude and phase values is selected to generate the feed-forward compensation values applied to the servo control system. In an alternative embodiment, the correlation is computed as a normalized correlation (e.g., using the equation shown in FIG. 4) to account for a difference in gain between each disturbance signal and the error signal.


Any suitable algorithm may be employed to generate the feed-forward compensation values in response to the selected disturbance signal. FIG. 6A shows an embodiment of the present invention for adaptively generating feed-forward compensation values. The selected disturbance signal S164i comprises a sequence of digital values x(n) that is filtered by a finite impulse response (FIR) filter 76 to generate feed-forward compensation values y(n) 60 applied to the plant C 80 representing the actuator 46. The output yc(n) 50 of the plant C 80 is subtracted from a reference to generate an error signal e(n) 54 (e.g., the PES of the VCM servo control system). The digital values x(n) of the selected disturbance signal S164i are applied to a model C* 84 of the plant C 80 to generate a sequence of digital values XC*(n) 86 representing the estimated effect the digital values x(n) 74 have on the plant C 80. An adaptive algorithm 88 processes the digital values XC*(n) 86 and the error signal e(n) 54 in order to adapt the FIR filter 76 toward a state that minimizes the error signal e(n) 54. In one embodiment, the goal is to minimize a cost function J(n)=E[e(n)2], where:

y(n)=wT(n)x(n)
e(n)=d(n)−yc(n)








x

c
*




(
n
)


=

[







i
=
0


I
-
1





c
i
*



x


(

n
-
i

)












i
=
0


I
-
1





c
i
*



x


(

n
-
i
-
1

)

















i
=
0


I
-
1





c
i
*



x


(

n
-
i
-
M
-
1

)







]






In the above equations, d(n) represents the reference signal an w represents the vector of coefficients in the FIR filter 76. To find the optimal coefficients of the FIR filter the gradient method is used as described by:

Δw(n)J(n)=2E[e(nw(n)e(n)]
which results in
w(n+1)=γw(n)+μxc*(n)e(n)

where γ represents the leakage factor and μ represents the step size. The above described adaption algorithm is based on a known filtered-X LMS algorithm. However, the feed-forward compensation values may be generated using any suitable algorithm.



FIG. 6B shows an embodiment of the present invention wherein the feed-forward compensation values are generated in response to two selected disturbance signals S1 and S2. The embodiment of FIG. 6B uses the same adaptive feed-forward algorithm as in FIG. 6A for each of the disturbance signals S1 and S2, and the outputs of the respective FIR filters 761 and 762 are combined 78 to generate the feed-forward compensation values 60 applied to the actuator 46 (the plant 80).


In another embodiment of the present invention, the optimal disturbance signal(s) that will optimize the feed-forward compensation are selected by evaluating a residual error of the servo control system. First feed-forward compensation values are generated in response to a first disturbance signal and an error signal of the servo control system. A first residual error is generated in response to the first feed-forward compensation values and an output of the servo control system. Second feed-forward compensation values are generated in response to a second disturbance signal and the error signal of the servo control system. A second residual error is generated in response to the second feed-forward compensation values and the output of the servo control system. At least one of the disturbance signals is selected in response to the first and second residual errors. Third feed-forward compensation values are generated in response to the selected disturbance signal, and the third feed-forward compensation values are applied to the servo control system to compensate for a vibration.



FIG. 7A shows an embodiment of the present invention for selecting the disturbance signal(s) that will optimize the feed-forward compensation based on a residual error of the servo control system. In this embodiment, each of the disturbance signals 641-64N is selected 82 one at a time (by configuring multiplexer 83) and used to generate 68 the feed-forward compensation values 60 applied to the servo control system. A residual error is generated based on the error signal 54 after performing feed-forward compensation for a period of time. After selecting each disturbance signal to generate the feed-forward compensation values 60 and generating a corresponding residual error, the disturbance signal(s) that generates the smallest residual error is selected 82 to generate 68 the feed-forward compensation values 60 during normal operation.



FIG. 7B shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention for selecting the disturbance signal(s) that will optimize the feed-forward compensation based on a residual error of the servo control system. In this embodiment, first feed-forward compensation values 901 are generated in response to a first disturbance signal 641 and an error signal 54 of the servo control system. The first feed-forward compensation values 901 are applied to a model 92 of at least part of the servo control system to generate a first model output 941. A first residual error 961 is generated in response to an output 50 of the servo control system and the first model output 941. Second feed-forward compensation values 902 are generated in response to a second disturbance signal 642 and the error signal 54 of the servo control system. The second feed-forward compensation values 902 are applied to the model 92 of at least part of the servo control system to generate a second model output 942. A second residual error 962 is generated in response to the output 50 of the servo control system and the second model output 942. At least one of the disturbance signals 641-64N is selected 98 in response to the residual errors 961-96N. A feed-forward compensation value 60 is generated in response to the selected disturbance signal 64i, and the feed-forward compensation value 60 is applied to the servo control system to compensate for a vibration.


In the embodiment of FIG. 7B, the feed-forward compensation values 901-90N generated by the feed-forward algorithms 1001-100N drive the model outputs 941-94N toward the output of the servo system 50. The disturbance signal(s) that correlate well with the error signal 54 will generate the model output 94 closest to the output 50 of the servo control system, thereby minimizing the residual error 96. Accordingly, in one embodiment the disturbance signal that generates the smallest residual error 96, or the M disturbance signals that generate a residual error 96 smaller than a threshold, are selected to generate the feed-forward compensation values 60 applied to the servo control system.


In one embodiment, when executing the algorithm for selecting the disturbance signals 641-64N, the feed-forward compensation of the servo control system is disabled. With the feed-forward compensation disabled, the effect of a vibration on the servo control system will manifest directly in the error signal 54 so that, for example, each of the disturbance signals 641-64N may be correlated directly with the error signal 54 as illustrated in the embodiment of FIG. 3A. After selecting the optimal disturbance signal(s) in response to the correlations, the feed-forward compensation is enabled using the selected disturbance signal(s).


In another embodiment, the feed-forward compensation is enabled while evaluating the disturbance signals 641-64N. For example, a first disturbance signal may be selected for feed-forward compensation while the disk drive is subjected to a first type of vibration. Over time the type of vibration may change (due a change in operating conditions) so that the first disturbance signal may no longer correlate well with the error signal 54. Accordingly, in one embodiment the control circuitry may execute the algorithm for selecting the disturbance signals 641-64N while the disk drive is operating normally, and change the selected disturbance signal(s) over time to adapt to changes in operating conditions. However, when the feed-forward compensation is enabled there will be at least some compensation of a different vibration using the currently selected disturbance signal. Therefore, in an embodiment shown in FIG. 8 a disturbance observer 102 may be employed to estimate the effect of a vibration on the servo control system. The disturbance observer 102 evaluates the control signal 48 applied to the actuator 46 in order to estimate the degree to which the feed-forward compensation is compensating for the current vibration. The degree to which the feed-forward compensation is not compensating for the vibration will be reflected as a residual error in the error signal 54. The disturbance observer 102 combines these signals to generate an error signal 104 that is used by the disturbance signal selection algorithm 106 to change the selected disturbance signal(s) over time to account for changes in the vibrations.


Any suitable control circuitry may be employed to implement the flow diagrams in the embodiments of the present invention, such as any suitable integrated circuit or circuits. For example, the control circuitry may be implemented within a read channel integrated circuit, or in a component separate from the read channel, such as a disk controller, or certain steps described above may be performed by a read channel and others by a disk controller. In one embodiment, the read channel and disk controller are implemented as separate integrated circuits, and in an alternative embodiment they are fabricated into a single integrated circuit or system on a chip (SOC). In addition, the control circuitry may include a suitable preamp circuit implemented as a separate integrated circuit, integrated into the read channel or disk controller circuit, or integrated into an SOC.


In one embodiment, the control circuitry comprises a microprocessor executing instructions, the instructions being operable to cause the microprocessor to perform the steps of the flow diagrams described herein. The instructions may be stored in any computer-readable medium. In one embodiment, they may be stored on a non-volatile semiconductor memory external to the microprocessor, or integrated with the microprocessor in a SOC. In another embodiment, the instructions are stored on the disk and read into a volatile semiconductor memory when the disk drive is powered on. In yet another embodiment, the control circuitry comprises suitable logic circuitry, such as state machine circuitry.

Claims
  • 1. A disk drive comprising: a disk;a head; andcontrol circuitry comprising a servo control system operable to actuate the head over the disk, the control circuitry operable to: generate a plurality of disturbance signals in response to a vibration, including a first disturbance signal and a second disturbance signal;generate first feed-forward compensation values in response to the first disturbance signal and an error signal of the servo control system;generate a first residual error in response to the first feed-forward compensation values and an output of the servo control system;generate second feed-forward compensation values in response to the second disturbance signal and the error signal of the servo control system;generate a second residual error in response to the second feed-forward compensation values and the output of the servo control system;select at least one of the disturbance signals in response to the first and second residual errors;generate third feed-forward compensation values in response to the selected disturbance signal; andapply the third feed-forward compensation value to the servo control system to compensate for the vibration.
  • 2. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is operable to select the disturbance signal that generates the smallest residual error.
  • 3. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further operable to: apply the first feed-forward compensation values to a model of at least part of the servo control system to generate a first model output;generate the first residual error in response to the output of the servo control system and the first model output;apply the second feed-forward compensation values to the model of at least part of the servo control system to generate a second model output; andgenerate the second residual error in response to the output of the servo control system and the second model output.
  • 4. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the servo control system actuates the head radially over the disk.
  • 5. The disk drive as recited in claim 4, wherein the error signal represents a difference between a measured radial location and a reference radial location.
  • 6. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the servo control system actuates the head vertically over the disk.
  • 7. The disk drive as recited in claim 6, wherein the error signal represents a difference between a measured fly height and a reference fly height.
  • 8. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry comprises an electrical sensor operable to generate at least one of the disturbance signals.
  • 9. The disk drive as recited in claim 8, wherein the control circuitry comprises: a first electrical sensor operable to generate a first disturbance signal representing a linear vibration; anda second electrical sensor operable to generate a second disturbance signal representing a rotational vibration.
  • 10. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is operable to generate at least one of the disturbance signals in response to a read signal emanating from the head.
  • 11. The disk drive as recited in claim 1, wherein the control circuitry is further operable to: select a plurality of the disturbance signals in response to the residual error generated for each disturbance signal; andgenerate the feed-forward compensation value in response to the selected disturbance signals.
  • 12. A method of operating a disk drive comprising a disk, a head, and a servo control system operable to actuate the head over the disk, the method comprising: generating a plurality of disturbance signals in response to a vibration, including a first disturbance signal and a second disturbance signal;generating first feed-forward compensation values in response to the first disturbance signal and an error signal of the servo control system;generating a first residual error in response to the first feed-forward compensation values and an output of the servo control system;generating second feed-forward compensation values in response to the second disturbance signal and the error signal of the servo control system;generating a second residual error in response to the second feed-forward compensation values and the output of the servo control system;selecting at least one of the disturbance signals in response to the first and second residual errors;generating third feed-forward compensation values in response to the selected disturbance signal; andapplying the third feed-forward compensation value to the servo control system to compensate for the vibration.
  • 13. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising selecting the disturbance signal that generates the smallest residual error.
  • 14. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising: applying the first feed-forward compensation values to a model of at least part of the servo control system to generate a first model output;generating the first residual error in response to the output of the servo control system and the first model output;applying the second feed-forward compensation values to the model of at least part of the servo control system to generate a second model output; andgenerating the second residual error in response to the output of the servo control system and the second model output.
  • 15. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the servo control system actuates the head radially over the disk.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the error signal represents a difference between a measured radial location and a reference radial location.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the servo control system actuates the head vertically over the disk.
  • 18. The method as recited in claim 17, wherein the error signal represents a difference between a measured fly height and a reference fly height.
  • 19. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the disk drive comprises an electrical sensor operable to generate at least one of the disturbance signals.
  • 20. The method as recited in claim 19, wherein the disk drive comprises: a first electrical sensor operable to generate a first disturbance signal representing a linear vibration; anda second electrical sensor operable to generate a second disturbance signal representing a rotational vibration.
  • 21. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising generating at least one of the disturbance signals in response to a read signal emanating from the head.
  • 22. The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising: selecting a plurality of the disturbance signals in response to the residual error generated for each disturbance signal; andgenerating the feed-forward compensation value in response to the selected disturbance signals.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/298,241, filed on Nov. 16, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (387)
Number Name Date Kind
5299075 Hanks Mar 1994 A
5333138 Richards et al. Jul 1994 A
5654840 Patton et al. Aug 1997 A
5663847 Abramovitch Sep 1997 A
5923487 Carlson et al. Jul 1999 A
6014283 Codilian et al. Jan 2000 A
6052076 Patton, III et al. Apr 2000 A
6052250 Golowka et al. Apr 2000 A
6067206 Hull et al. May 2000 A
6078453 Dziallo et al. Jun 2000 A
6091564 Codilian et al. Jul 2000 A
6094020 Goretzki et al. Jul 2000 A
6101065 Alfred et al. Aug 2000 A
6104153 Codilian et al. Aug 2000 A
6115200 Allen et al. Sep 2000 A
6122133 Nazarian et al. Sep 2000 A
6122135 Stich Sep 2000 A
6141175 Nazarian et al. Oct 2000 A
6160368 Plutowski Dec 2000 A
6181502 Hussein et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195222 Heminger et al. Feb 2001 B1
6198584 Codilian et al. Mar 2001 B1
6198590 Codilian et al. Mar 2001 B1
6204988 Codilian et al. Mar 2001 B1
6243223 Elliott et al. Jun 2001 B1
6281652 Ryan et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285521 Hussein Sep 2001 B1
6292320 Mason et al. Sep 2001 B1
6310742 Nazarian et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320718 Bouwkamp et al. Nov 2001 B1
6342984 Hussein et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347018 Kadlec et al. Feb 2002 B1
6369972 Codilian et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369974 Asgari et al. Apr 2002 B1
6414813 Cvancara Jul 2002 B2
6429990 Serrano et al. Aug 2002 B2
6462896 Codilian et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476996 Ryan Nov 2002 B1
6484577 Bennett Nov 2002 B1
6493169 Ferris et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496324 Golowka et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498698 Golowka et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507450 Elliott Jan 2003 B1
6534936 Messenger et al. Mar 2003 B2
6538839 Ryan Mar 2003 B1
6545835 Codilian et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549359 Bennett et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549361 Bennett et al. Apr 2003 B1
6560056 Ryan May 2003 B1
6564110 Makino et al. May 2003 B1
6568268 Bennett May 2003 B1
6574062 Bennett et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577465 Bennett et al. Jun 2003 B1
6614615 Ju et al. Sep 2003 B1
6614618 Sheh et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636377 Yu et al. Oct 2003 B1
6674600 Codilian et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690536 Ryan Feb 2004 B1
6693764 Sheh et al. Feb 2004 B1
6707635 Codilian et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710953 Vallis et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710966 Codilian et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714371 Codilian Mar 2004 B1
6714372 Codilian et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724564 Codilian et al. Apr 2004 B1
6731450 Codilian et al. May 2004 B1
6735041 Codilian et al. May 2004 B1
6738220 Codilian May 2004 B1
6747837 Bennett Jun 2004 B1
6754021 Kisaka et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760186 Codilian et al. Jul 2004 B1
6788483 Ferris et al. Sep 2004 B1
6791785 Messenger et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795262 Codilian et al. Sep 2004 B1
6795268 Ryan Sep 2004 B1
6819518 Melkote et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826006 Melkote et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826007 Patton, III Nov 2004 B1
6847502 Codilian Jan 2005 B1
6850383 Bennett Feb 2005 B1
6850384 Bennett Feb 2005 B1
6853512 Ozawa Feb 2005 B2
6867944 Ryan Mar 2005 B1
6876508 Patton, III et al. Apr 2005 B1
6882496 Codilian et al. Apr 2005 B1
6885514 Codilian et al. Apr 2005 B1
6900958 Yi et al. May 2005 B1
6900959 Gardner et al. May 2005 B1
6903897 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B1
6909574 Aikawa et al. Jun 2005 B2
6914740 Tu et al. Jul 2005 B1
6914743 Narayana et al. Jul 2005 B1
6920004 Codilian et al. Jul 2005 B1
6922304 Nakagawa Jul 2005 B2
6924959 Melkote et al. Aug 2005 B1
6924960 Melkote et al. Aug 2005 B1
6924961 Melkote et al. Aug 2005 B1
6934114 Codilian et al. Aug 2005 B1
6934135 Ryan Aug 2005 B1
6937420 McNab et al. Aug 2005 B1
6937423 Ngo et al. Aug 2005 B1
6950271 Inaji et al. Sep 2005 B2
6952318 Ngo Oct 2005 B1
6952322 Codilian et al. Oct 2005 B1
6954324 Tu et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958881 Codilian et al. Oct 2005 B1
6958882 Kisaka Oct 2005 B2
6963465 Melkote et al. Nov 2005 B1
6965488 Bennett Nov 2005 B1
6967458 Bennett et al. Nov 2005 B1
6967804 Codilian Nov 2005 B1
6967811 Codilian et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970319 Bennett et al. Nov 2005 B1
6972539 Codilian et al. Dec 2005 B1
6972540 Wang et al. Dec 2005 B1
6972922 Subrahmanyam et al. Dec 2005 B1
6975480 Codilian et al. Dec 2005 B1
6977789 Cloke Dec 2005 B1
6980389 Kupferman Dec 2005 B1
6987636 Chue et al. Jan 2006 B1
6987639 Yu Jan 2006 B1
6989954 Lee et al. Jan 2006 B1
6992848 Agarwal et al. Jan 2006 B1
6992851 Cloke Jan 2006 B1
6992852 Ying et al. Jan 2006 B1
6995941 Miyamura et al. Feb 2006 B1
6999263 Melkote et al. Feb 2006 B1
6999267 Melkote et al. Feb 2006 B1
7006320 Bennett et al. Feb 2006 B1
7016134 Agarwal et al. Mar 2006 B1
7023637 Kupferman Apr 2006 B1
7023640 Codilian et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027256 Subrahmanyam et al. Apr 2006 B1
7027257 Kupferman Apr 2006 B1
7035026 Codilian et al. Apr 2006 B2
7046472 Melkote et al. May 2006 B1
7050249 Chue et al. May 2006 B1
7050254 Yu et al. May 2006 B1
7050258 Codilian May 2006 B1
7054098 Yu et al. May 2006 B1
7061714 Yu Jun 2006 B1
7064918 Codilian et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068451 Wang et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068459 Cloke et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068461 Chue et al. Jun 2006 B1
7068463 Ji et al. Jun 2006 B1
7088547 Wang et al. Aug 2006 B1
7095579 Ryan et al. Aug 2006 B1
7110208 Miyamura et al. Sep 2006 B1
7110214 Tu et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113362 Lee et al. Sep 2006 B1
7113365 Ryan et al. Sep 2006 B1
7116505 Kupferman Oct 2006 B1
7116611 Yokoyama Oct 2006 B2
7126781 Bennett Oct 2006 B1
7139401 Culman et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142385 Shimotono et al. Nov 2006 B2
7154690 Brunnett et al. Dec 2006 B1
7158329 Ryan Jan 2007 B1
7180703 Subrahmanyam et al. Feb 2007 B1
7184230 Chue et al. Feb 2007 B1
7196864 Yi et al. Mar 2007 B1
7199964 Liu et al. Apr 2007 B2
7199966 Tu et al. Apr 2007 B1
7203021 Ryan et al. Apr 2007 B1
7203028 Chung et al. Apr 2007 B2
7209321 Bennett Apr 2007 B1
7212364 Lee May 2007 B1
7212374 Wang et al May 2007 B1
7215504 Bennett May 2007 B1
7224546 Orakcilar et al. May 2007 B1
7248426 Weerasooriya et al. Jul 2007 B1
7251098 Wang et al. Jul 2007 B1
7253582 Ding et al. Aug 2007 B1
7253989 Lau et al. Aug 2007 B1
7265933 Phan et al. Sep 2007 B1
7265934 Takaishi Sep 2007 B2
7289288 Tu Oct 2007 B1
7292403 Baek et al. Nov 2007 B2
7298574 Melkote et al. Nov 2007 B1
7301717 Lee et al. Nov 2007 B1
7304819 Melkote et al. Dec 2007 B1
7315433 Baek et al. Jan 2008 B2
7319570 Jia et al. Jan 2008 B2
7330019 Bennett Feb 2008 B1
7330327 Chue et al. Feb 2008 B1
7330332 Baek et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333280 Lifchits et al. Feb 2008 B1
7333290 Kupferman Feb 2008 B1
7339761 Tu et al. Mar 2008 B1
7365932 Bennett Apr 2008 B1
7372659 Takaishi May 2008 B2
7382563 Saitoh et al. Jun 2008 B2
7388728 Chen et al. Jun 2008 B1
7391583 Sheh et al. Jun 2008 B1
7391584 Sheh et al. Jun 2008 B1
7423833 Sutardja Sep 2008 B1
7433143 Ying et al. Oct 2008 B1
7440210 Lee Oct 2008 B1
7440225 Chen et al. Oct 2008 B1
7450334 Wang et al. Nov 2008 B1
7450336 Wang et al. Nov 2008 B1
7453661 Jang et al. Nov 2008 B1
7457071 Sheh Nov 2008 B1
7466101 Takaishi Dec 2008 B2
7466509 Chen et al. Dec 2008 B1
7468855 Weerasooriya et al. Dec 2008 B1
7471483 Ferris et al. Dec 2008 B1
7477471 Nemshick et al. Jan 2009 B1
7480116 Bennett Jan 2009 B1
7489464 McNab et al. Feb 2009 B1
7492546 Miyamura Feb 2009 B1
7495857 Bennett Feb 2009 B1
7499236 Lee et al. Mar 2009 B1
7502192 Wang et al. Mar 2009 B1
7502195 Wu et al. Mar 2009 B1
7502197 Chue Mar 2009 B1
7504795 Takaishi Mar 2009 B2
7505223 McCornack Mar 2009 B1
7535192 Takaishi May 2009 B2
7542225 Ding et al. Jun 2009 B1
7548392 Desai et al. Jun 2009 B1
7551390 Wang et al. Jun 2009 B1
7558016 Le et al. Jul 2009 B1
7561365 Noguchi et al. Jul 2009 B2
7573670 Ryan et al. Aug 2009 B1
7576941 Chen et al. Aug 2009 B1
7580212 Li et al. Aug 2009 B1
7583470 Chen et al. Sep 2009 B1
7595953 Cerda et al. Sep 2009 B1
7595954 Chen et al. Sep 2009 B1
7596795 Ding et al. Sep 2009 B2
7602575 Lifchits et al. Oct 2009 B1
7616399 Chen et al. Nov 2009 B1
7619844 Bennett Nov 2009 B1
7626782 Yu et al. Dec 2009 B1
7630162 Zhao et al. Dec 2009 B2
7633704 Supino et al. Dec 2009 B2
7639447 Yu et al. Dec 2009 B1
7656604 Liang et al. Feb 2010 B1
7656607 Bennett Feb 2010 B1
7660067 Ji et al. Feb 2010 B1
7663835 Yu et al. Feb 2010 B1
7675707 Liu et al. Mar 2010 B1
7679854 Narayana et al. Mar 2010 B1
7688534 McCornack Mar 2010 B1
7688538 Chen et al. Mar 2010 B1
7688539 Bryant et al. Mar 2010 B1
7697233 Bennett et al. Apr 2010 B1
7701661 Bennett Apr 2010 B1
7710676 Chue May 2010 B1
7715138 Kupferman May 2010 B1
7729079 Huber Jun 2010 B1
7733189 Bennett Jun 2010 B1
7746592 Liang et al. Jun 2010 B1
7746594 Guo et al. Jun 2010 B1
7746595 Guo et al. Jun 2010 B1
7760461 Bennett Jul 2010 B1
7800853 Guo et al. Sep 2010 B1
7800856 Bennett et al. Sep 2010 B1
7800857 Calaway et al. Sep 2010 B1
7839591 Weerasooriya et al. Nov 2010 B1
7839595 Chue et al. Nov 2010 B1
7839600 Babinski et al. Nov 2010 B1
7843662 Weerasooriya et al. Nov 2010 B1
7852588 Ferris et al. Dec 2010 B1
7852592 Liang et al. Dec 2010 B1
7864481 Kon et al. Jan 2011 B1
7864482 Babinski et al. Jan 2011 B1
7869155 Wong Jan 2011 B1
7876522 Calaway et al. Jan 2011 B1
7876523 Panyavoravaj et al. Jan 2011 B1
7881009 Cherubini Feb 2011 B2
7916415 Chue Mar 2011 B1
7916416 Guo et al. Mar 2011 B1
7916420 McFadyen et al. Mar 2011 B1
7916422 Guo et al. Mar 2011 B1
7929238 Vasquez Apr 2011 B1
7940489 Sutardja May 2011 B1
7961422 Chen et al. Jun 2011 B1
8000053 Anderson Aug 2011 B1
8031423 Tsai et al. Oct 2011 B1
8054022 Ryan et al. Nov 2011 B1
8059357 Knigge et al. Nov 2011 B1
8059360 Melkote et al. Nov 2011 B1
8072703 Calaway et al. Dec 2011 B1
8077428 Chen et al. Dec 2011 B1
8078901 Meyer et al. Dec 2011 B1
8081395 Ferris Dec 2011 B1
8085020 Bennett Dec 2011 B1
8116023 Kupferman Feb 2012 B1
8145934 Ferris et al. Mar 2012 B1
8179626 Ryan et al. May 2012 B1
8180464 Gao et al. May 2012 B2
8189286 Chen et al. May 2012 B1
8213106 Guo et al. Jul 2012 B1
8254222 Tang Aug 2012 B1
8300348 Liu et al. Oct 2012 B1
8315005 Zou et al. Nov 2012 B1
8320069 Knigge et al. Nov 2012 B1
8351174 Gardner et al. Jan 2013 B1
8358114 Ferris et al. Jan 2013 B1
8358145 Ferris et al. Jan 2013 B1
8390367 Bennett Mar 2013 B1
8432031 Agness et al. Apr 2013 B1
8432629 Rigney et al. Apr 2013 B1
8451697 Rigney et al. May 2013 B1
8477444 Zou et al. Jul 2013 B1
8482873 Chue et al. Jul 2013 B1
8498076 Sheh et al. Jul 2013 B1
8498172 Patton, III et al. Jul 2013 B1
8508881 Babinski et al. Aug 2013 B1
8531798 Xi et al. Sep 2013 B1
8537486 Liang et al. Sep 2013 B2
8542455 Huang et al. Sep 2013 B2
8553351 Narayana et al. Oct 2013 B1
8564899 Lou et al. Oct 2013 B2
8576506 Wang et al. Nov 2013 B1
8605382 Mallary et al. Dec 2013 B1
8605384 Liu et al. Dec 2013 B1
8610391 Yang et al. Dec 2013 B1
8611040 Xi et al. Dec 2013 B1
8619385 Guo et al. Dec 2013 B1
8630054 Bennett et al. Jan 2014 B2
8630059 Chen et al. Jan 2014 B1
8634154 Rigney et al. Jan 2014 B1
8634158 Chahwan et al. Jan 2014 B1
8634283 Rigney et al. Jan 2014 B1
8643976 Wang et al. Feb 2014 B1
8644963 Gao et al. Feb 2014 B2
8649121 Smith et al. Feb 2014 B1
8654466 McFadyen Feb 2014 B1
8654467 Wong et al. Feb 2014 B1
8665546 Zhao et al. Mar 2014 B1
8665551 Rigney et al. Mar 2014 B1
8670206 Liang et al. Mar 2014 B1
8687312 Liang Apr 2014 B1
8693123 Guo et al. Apr 2014 B1
8693134 Xi et al. Apr 2014 B1
8699173 Kang et al. Apr 2014 B1
8711027 Bennett Apr 2014 B1
8717696 Ryan et al. May 2014 B1
8717699 Ferris May 2014 B1
8717704 Yu et al. May 2014 B1
8724245 Smith et al. May 2014 B1
8724253 Liang et al. May 2014 B1
8724524 Urabe et al. May 2014 B2
8737008 Watanabe et al. May 2014 B1
8737013 Zhou et al. May 2014 B2
8743495 Chen et al. Jun 2014 B1
8743503 Tang et al. Jun 2014 B1
8743504 Bryant et al. Jun 2014 B1
8749904 Liang et al. Jun 2014 B1
8760796 Lou et al. Jun 2014 B1
8767332 Chahwan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8767343 Helmick et al. Jul 2014 B1
8767354 Ferris et al. Jul 2014 B1
8773787 Beker Jul 2014 B1
8779574 Agness et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780473 Zhao et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780477 Guo et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780479 Helmick et al. Jul 2014 B1
8780489 Gayaka et al. Jul 2014 B1
8792202 Wan et al. Jul 2014 B1
8797664 Guo et al. Aug 2014 B1
8804267 Huang et al. Aug 2014 B2
20020153451 Kiss et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030123182 Inaji et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040080860 Inaji et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040240101 Inaji et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050088774 Bahirat et al. Apr 2005 A1
20060291087 Suh et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060291101 Takaishi Dec 2006 A1
20080065240 Takaishi Mar 2008 A1
20080174900 Abrishamchian et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090002869 Cherubini Jan 2009 A1
20090034116 Higashino et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090034117 Higashino Feb 2009 A1
20090135516 Takasaki et al. May 2009 A1
20100035085 Jung et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100061007 Matsushita et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100079906 Wile et al. Apr 2010 A1
20120050904 Park et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120284493 Lou et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130120870 Zhou et al. May 2013 A1
20130148240 Ferris et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140195013 Gao et al. Jul 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2001-266466 Sep 2001 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
L Hakansson, “The Filtered-x LMS Alogrithm”, Department of Telecommunications and Signal Processing, University of Karlskrona/Rooneby, 372 25 Ronneby, Sweden, Jan. 15, 2004.
Min Chen, et. al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/162,095, filed Jun. 16, 2011, 27 pages.
Jianguo Zhou, et. al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,241, filed Nov. 16, 2011, 28 pages.
Jianguo Zhou, et. al., Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,241, filed Nov. 16, 2011, 10 pages.
Jianguo Zhou, et. al., Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 17, 2014, U.S. Appl. No. 13/298,241, filed Nov. 16, 2011, 10 pages.
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13298241 Nov 2011 US
Child 14253797 US