The present application is based on and claims priority of Japanese patent application No. 2004-343963 filed on Nov. 29, 2004, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a disk reproduction apparatus which is capable of reproducing a plurality of types of disks and is also capable of reading and reproducing a disk by determining a type of the disk medium through a retry operation when the disk cannot be read at the first time of loading.
2. Description of the Related Art
A conventional retry-capable disk reproduction apparatus is disclosed, for example, in Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 2001-43609 (patent document 1). For an improvement of disk discrimination accuracy and speed, this apparatus ascertains a disk designation after a disk is inserted, and when the disk cannot be reproduced at the first time of disk discriminating operation, this apparatus selects types of disks one by one on the basis of previous reproduction history to reduce the time for reproduction. The reproduction history is made according to an addition method in which data updating is performed repetitively.
The above conventional art has some disadvantages.
In the case where the order of priority for discriminating the type of a disk is determined based on the reproduction history according to the addition method, frequent use of a disk medium for a certain period of time reduces the possibility that a user-desired type of disk which has hardly been used is discriminated preferentially, and accordingly it takes time for reproduction. For example, a large volume of historical data of a single-layer DVD has already been added because the single-layer DVD out of several disk media was frequently used a year ago, and when a double-layer DVD starts to be used recently in the above state, the single-layer DVD is discriminated first until the amount of historical data of the double-layer DVD exceeds that of the single-layer DVD.
Furthermore, when the order of priority for discriminating a disk type is determined based only on the historical data, a change in user's preferences cannot be coped with flexibly.
Moreover, the order of priority for discriminating a disk type is determined after a disk is inserted, and therefore it takes time to read the inserted disk. A disk search is started after a disk is inserted, then the type of the disk medium is selected appropriately, and finally a read operation is started.
The present invention is achieved in consideration of the foregoing problems, and an object thereof is to provide a disk reproduction apparatus which can increase the speed of discriminating a disk type and quickly cope with a change in user's preferences, and which requires less time to determine the order of priority of disk type discrimination.
The disk reproduction apparatus of the present invention according to claim 1 is the one which is capable of reproducing a plurality of types of disk media, and is characterized in that, when a type of a disk medium is discriminated by making a retry because the disk cannot be read at the first time of loading, disk loading is automatically performed until the disk is successfully read, according to an order of priority determined based on a method selected in advance by a user from a plurality of methods of setting the order of priority of disk medium discrimination.
The disk reproduction apparatus of the present invention according to claim 2 is characterized in that, in the disk reproduction apparatus of claim 1, one of the plurality of methods of setting the order of priority of disk medium discrimination is selectable which include a fixing method in which a user presets types of disk media to be discriminated upon a retry and a discriminating order of the disk media, and a historical data method in which the discriminating order is automatically set based on historical data in the order of decreasing frequency of reproduction.
The disk reproduction apparatus according to claim 3 is characterized in that, in the disk reproduction apparatus of claim 2, the historical data in the historical data method is data obtained according to an addition method in which a weight is assigned to the historical data by incrementing history of a discriminated disk type.
The disk reproduction apparatus according to claim 4 is characterized in that, in the disk reproduction apparatus of claim 2, the historical data in the historical data method is data obtained according to a calculation method in which a weight is assigned to the historical data by incrementing history of a discriminated disk type and decrementing history of other undiscriminated disk types.
The disk reproduction apparatus according to claim 5 is characterized in that, in the disk reproduction apparatus of any one of claims 2 to 4, it is possible to select whether the historical data is based on the addition method or the calculation method.
The disk reproduction apparatus according to claim 6 is characterized in that, in the disk reproduction apparatus of any one of claims 2 to 5, the historical data is accessible by a user to confirm history of disk media.
The disk reproduction apparatus according to claim 7 is characterized in that in the disk reproduction apparatus of any one of claims 2 to 6, a user is allowed to access and confirm the historical data of disk media, and based on a result of the historical data, the user is allowed to select an appropriate method of setting the order of priority of disk medium discrimination, set types of disk media and the order of priority thereof according to the fixing method, or make settings for the historical data addition method and the historical data calculation method.
A preferred embodiment for implementing a disk reproduction apparatus according to the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings, but the present invention is not limited to this embodiment.
The block diagram in
The first time of read operation of a disk medium is made as exemplified in
The retry operation of disk discrimination is performed according to one selected from a fixing method and a historical data method (see
In the fixing method, a user can set the order of priority to disk discrimination means upon retry operation through a menu screen (see
In the historical data method, the order of priority of disk type discrimination in retry operation is determined based on weights of the previous reproduction frequency (see
In the historical data addition method, every time a disk medium is selected, the historical data thereof is incremented by one, and a disk medium whose total number of selected times is large is set to a priority disk in retry operation. The history of a disk medium whose type is discriminated and which is then read and reproduced is incremented one by one limitlessly. Or alternatively, it is also allowable to set the maximum value in consideration of memory capacity and to reset when a certain number of times is reached. A disk medium whose number of reproduction remains 0 for a long time is eliminated from the historical data to reduce the volume thereof, and this disk medium is removed from target disk media for confirmation of reproduction frequency of the historical data in order to reduce the number of types of disk media subjected to data processing in retry operation, thereby making it possible to reduce the time required for the retry operation.
In the historical data calculation method, every time a disk medium is discriminated and reproduced, the historical data thereof is incremented by one, and the historical data of other disk media is decremented by one (see
When “see previous historical data” is selected on a setting screen of
When a disk inserted for reproduction cannot be read at the first time of loading because the disk is of inferior quality, discrimination means for a retry can be set freely. Since a user is allowed to set in advance a method of setting the order of priority of disk type discrimination when a retry is made, it is not necessary to determine a discriminating order after a disk is inserted, thereby reducing time required for discrimination process. A disk type discriminating method is selectable from the following two methods: a fixing method in which a user can freely set types of disk media and a discriminating order thereof and a historical data method in which disk media are discriminated based on historical data in the order of decreasing frequency of reproduction. Furthermore, the historical data method is selectable from an addition method and a calculation method so as to flexibly cope with user's preferences or states, so that effective discrimination can be done with appropriate settings. The method of setting the order of priority for disk medium discrimination is selected in advance by a user from the fixing method and historical data method, which eliminates processes which have been done before, such as disk surface detection, single or double-layer detection, and CD or DVD detection, thereby increasing the reading speed.
In particular, according to the fixing method, a user fixes types of disk media and a discriminating order thereof when a retry is made, so that the user can raise the priority of a frequently used disk medium and also lower the priority of a less frequently used disk medium within a range of his/her recognition, which makes it possible to reflect user's recognition in discrimination process in a retry operation.
In particular, according to the historical data method, the order of priority of disk media when a retry is made is automatically set based on the previous reproduction frequency historical data, so that a retry can be automatically made for each disk medium in the order of decreasing frequency of previous reproduction, regardless of user's recognition. As the historical data, previous discrimination results are accumulated for each type of disk media. Variations in reproduction frequency are reflected in the historical data by assigning a weight thereto, so that the historical data can be well organized. The well-organized historical data makes it possible to eliminate unnecessary historical data of a less frequency disk medium from the historical data or to remove the less frequency disk medium from target media for a retry, which leads to a reduction in the volume of historical data and to less time required for retry operation due to a decreased number of target media.
Since the historical data can be accessed and confirmed, a user is allowed to see the historical data, so that the historical data can be reflected in user's determination of narrowing down disk media and setting the order of priority thereof according to the fixing method.
The discriminating method includes three options: fixing method; historical data addition method; and historical data calculation method. A user confirms the historical data, selects an appropriate method according to the circumstances, and makes various settings, so that one of those methods which require less processing time can be selected. Although differences are caused depending on operations, all users can reduce the time required for read operation of the disk reproduction apparatus.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2004-343963 | Nov 2004 | JP | national |