This present invention is in the field of protective window systems providing improved protection for individual and equipment preset within a protected space or structure. In particular, the invention is concerned with a blast resistant window system which may be easily removed, e.g. for cleaning and maintenance, and reinstalled in a foolproof manner.
One particular use of such a window system is, for example, for use in preservation buildings wherein it is desired to maintain the original windows and nevertheless provide a blast resistant window protection system. Other use of such systems is for retrofit at any desired window opening.
The term “window” as used herein in the specification and claims refers to a variety of window types, e.g. swingable, tiltable casement windows, fixed windows, curtain walls, etc.
It is an ever-growing trend by different authorities that old buildings and monuments be preserved so as to maintain the legacy of old ages. Such buildings are often fitted with their original window systems which at times are extremely old and in many cases are no longer suitable for use. Even more so, such window systems may be unstable and loosely fitted within the opening in the wall in a manner which may be dangerous to inhabitants or visitors within the structure. Still another problem concerned in particular with old buildings, but restricted thereto, is the weakness of the walls, which may at times be vulnerable themselves.
It is also an ever-growing requirement to provide public buildings and government institutes with blast-resistant and reinforced window systems suitable for confronting terrorist attacks and the like.
A variety of blast-resistant windows and such window systems are available. However, for most such reinforced systems it is required to remove the original window system which, as mentioned hereinabove, does not suit the present case. Furthermore, it is a requirement that such a reinforced window system may be easily removed, e.g. at times when it is not required to have a reinforced window system, or for exposing the original window, maintenance thereof, cleaning, etc.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel reinforced window system which, on the one hand, provides a reliable blast-resistant window system and, on the other hand, is easily fitted into an opening of a wall also in case the opening is pre-fitted with an existing window system. It is a further object of the present invention to provide such a window system which is easily removed and is mounted back into place with minimum skill required.
The present invention calls for a reinforced window system which may be fitted and mounted within an opening in a wall which may already be fitted with a window, e.g. a preservation window, without causing any damage hereto. It is an important feature of the invention that the reinforced window system be adapted for easy mounting and dismounting and that it be capable of absorbing blast energy, to prevent injury and damage from people and equipment within a space in which the window is fitted, even where it is mounted on a weak wall.
According to the present invention there is provided a reinforced window system for mounting within an opening in a wall, the window system comprising a frame fixable to the opening; said frame comprising an outside support panel and one or more fixable fixing members distributed on an inside of the frame; a reinforced window pane fixedly supported with a removable frame; said removable frame comprising a plurality of support members articulated to the support frame and adapted for engagement by the corresponding fixing members; and locking members for thereby positioning and fixing the removable frame within the frame.
The window system is fitted with a blast energy absorbing mechanism wherein the support members are formed with at least one arm which at a mounted state of the support frame, extends opposite a corresponding flange associated with the frame, i.e. integral with the frame or otherwise articulated thereto. In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the flange is a portion of the fixing members adapted for engagement with a corresponding first arm of a support member. In accordance with a further embodiment of the invention the flange is an extension of the frame adapted for engagement with a corresponding second arm of a support member.
By one particular embodiment of the invention, the support members are bifurcated elements having a first arm and a second arm, which arms at a mounted state of the support frame, extend opposite a corresponding portion of the fixing members and an extension flange of the frame.
The arrangement is such that a shock wave striking the window pane gives rise to generation of forces acting in the plane of the window pane and orthogonally thereto, displacing the support frame in an inward, radial direction, whereby the at least one arm of the support members engage the corresponding flanges.
By one particular design of the invention, the window system is a foolproof system, whereby the fixing members and the corresponding support members of the frame and the support frame, respectively, are distributed such that they extend opposite one another only at a correct mounting of the support frame within the frame, or such that only one of the support members there are provided fixing members.
The invention further calls for a framework for a removable reinforced window system comprising a frame fixable within an opening in a wall; said frame comprising an outside support panel and a plurality of fixable fixing members distributed on an inside of the frame; a reinforced window pane fixedly supported within a removable frame; said removable frame comprising a plurality of support members articulated to the support frame and adapted for engagement by the corresponding fixing members; and locking members for positioning and fixing the removable frame within the frame.
In order to understand the invention and to see how it may be carried out in practice, one preferred embodiment will now be described, by way of anon-limiting example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Turning first to
When it becomes necessary to install a reinforced window system generally designated 20, a frame 24 having a general inverted L-like shape with a first arm 25 and a second arm 26, is fitted within an opening 16 by means of bolts 27. In the present embodiment, frame 24 is entirely received within opening 16 though it will be appreciated that in other cases the frame may be partially fitted within the opening 16 and partially extending into the room space or, when there is only limited space at the opening, the frame 24 may be fitted on an inside portion of the wall, corresponding with the opening 16.
As can further be seen in
Fitted within receptacle recess 28 there is a fixing member 46 having an anchoring flange portion 48 formed with a long leg portion 50 and a short leg portion 52 and adapted for insertion into receptacle recess 28 of the frame 24 by displacing it from the initial state illustrated by dashed lines into its final position in the direction of arrow 56 (
The frame assembly as disclosed herein so far, constitutes a portion which is fixed at the opening 16. However, the window pane is removable and may be installed ad hoc, upon demand and may easily be removed, e.g. for maintenance thereof, for reaching the historic window 10 etc.
A window pane designated 64 is in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a reinforced window consisting of two glass panes with a layer of resin laminate therebetween. However, it is appreciated that the window pane 64 may consist of several different layers and different thickness or may be a homogenous window pane made, e.g. of polycarbonate, imparting it ballistic-resistant. The window pane 64 is fixedly attached to a support frame 68 by an adhesive, e.g. low module silicone 70, in a manner wherein the window pane 64 is attached to the support frame 68 in a secure manner which will withstand also high shear forces. The arrangement is such that the attachment of window pane 64 to support frame 68 is designed to withstand high shear forces and not to detach. The adhesive material also plays a roll in initial dampening of some of the blast energy forces. However, other mechanic arrangements may suit for that purpose, as known per Se.
Support frame 68 is integrally formed with an extension 76 which apart from imparting the support frame 68 a higher moment of inertia, it also serves for aesthetic reasons, whereby it conceals the engagement arrangement of the support frame 68 with the frame 24. A concealing frame panel 80 is removably connected to extension 76 by bolts 82 (or by a suitable locking clamp) and may have different shapes to correspond with the shape and size of the opening in the wall.
Support frame 68 further comprises a receiving groove 84 fitted for receiving with a plurality of support members 88.
Turning now to a particular embodiment depicted in
The arrangement is such that the side frame members designated 68s are fitted with the larger support members 90 adjacent edges of the profiles 68 whilst the top and bottom support frames 68t and 68b are fitted with the narrow support members 92 adjacent the edges. This arrangement is adapted for an easy mounting of the support frame 68 within the frame 24 in a foolproof manner, whereby opposite one of the fixing members (each of the narrow fixing members 92, in the present example), there extends a securing bolt 62 of a fixing member 46. It is apparent that a myriad of positioning arrangements of the support members and the corresponding fixing members, as well as the distribution of the securing bolts, is possible. For example, support members 90 and 92 at one edge of the window, may be a unitary article. Further distinguishing may be accomplished by different color or other indications.
Reverting now to
Thus, it appears that mounting and removing of the frame 68 with the window pane 64 is a simple procedure, whereby it is merely required to release bolts 62 and remove the fixing members 46, whereby the support frame 68 may be removed. Assembly is obtained in a reverse sequence of operation.
A person versed in the art will appreciate that the number and size, as well as the distribution of the fixing members 46 and support members 88 may vary, depending on the purpose of the window and other considerations.
Furthermore, in order to render the window system also ballistic-resistance, the outward facing arm 25 of the frame 24 may be reinforced or covered by a bullet resistant cover, e.g. a steel frame or other resistant material, e.g. non-woven ballistic resistant material such as Kevlar™. Such bullet resistant material may be also applied at an inner side of that profile, so it is noticeable from the outside.
As the window pane 64 continues to deform inwardly (
It is to be appreciated that the support members and/or fixing members may be staggered so as to gradually engage one another, thereby providing increasing force dampening resistance. Also, the first arms 94 and 96 and the corresponding flanges 36 and hooked flanges 60, may be pre designed so as to gradually deform or sheer, depending on the required energy dampening effect. Different parameters may be controlled, e.g. length and thickness of the components, imparting them with reinforcement ribs or, contrary thereto, with sheer grooves, etc.
A person skilled in the art will not have any difficulty to understand that the size and shape of the first and second arms 94 and 96 and the extension 98 of the support member, as well as the size and shape of corresponding flanges 36 and hooked flange portions 60 may be designed to withstand different magnitudes of forces, taking into consideration the blast resistancy of the window pane.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3774363 | Kent | Nov 1973 | A |
4248933 | Katoh | Feb 1981 | A |
4625659 | Saelzer | Dec 1986 | A |
4630411 | Salzer | Dec 1986 | A |
4879957 | Habicht et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5544457 | Labrecque | Aug 1996 | A |
5653073 | Palmer | Aug 1997 | A |
5758459 | Koike et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797229 | Alvarez et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6088978 | Satterwhite | Jul 2000 | A |
6230455 | Arehart et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6260251 | Guhl | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272812 | Richardson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6455819 | Pohl et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2331332 | Dec 1974 | DE |
3127631 | Jan 1983 | DE |
3142690 | May 1983 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020184839 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |