This application claims priority from Italian Application No. MI 2010A001243, filed on Jul. 6, 2010.
The present invention relates to a dispensing cap with automatic valve for containers for transporting and dispensing liquid or creamy substances.
It relates in particular to a cap associable with a flexible container.
Caps are currently known presenting a silicone insert located in proximity to a dispensing port of the cap.
This silicone or thermoplastic rubber insert is produced by moulding. It comprises a top part of predetermined thickness in which a cross-shaped cut is made after moulding.
The cross-shaped cut creates four flaps which when frontally resting one against another hermetically close the container, whereas when a is pressure exceeding a certain threshold value is present in the container they flex outwards to hence free a dispensing port.
The drawback of this known art is that if the product to be dispensed contains sticky components, the front edges of the flaps can stick together and become difficult to open, necessarily requiring more pressure.
A further drawback of the known art is that when the flaps move into their closure position they frontally press against each other to form a hermetic seal which does not allow air to enter the container.
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide a cap which represents an improvement over the known art.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a cap in which the pressure required to open the valve is substantially constant and is not influenced by any product residues which remain on the valve.
These and other objects are attained by a cap in accordance with the technical teachings of the accompanying claims.
Further characteristics and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description of a preferred but non-exclusive embodiment of the invention, illustrated by way of no-limiting example in the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to said figures, these show a dispensing cap 1 with automatic valve 2 for containers (not shown) able to transport and dispense liquid or creamy substances such as creams, shampoos, liquid soaps, balsams and the like.
The cap 1 (see
The profiled body 3 comprises a seat 7 presenting undercut and snap-fixing means 8 which lock the valve 2 in a position corresponding with the dispensing port 9, this opening towards the outside of the cap.
The valve 2 presents a body formed of soft plastic material and is provided, for its fixing to the cap, with means substantially comprising a flange 2A which extends into the lower portion of the valve and connects to the snap-fixing means 8.
The material with which the valve is formed can be thermoplastic rubber, SEBS, LLDPE, silicone or any other material suitable for the purpose.
Extending from the valve body 2B there are two first flaps 20A, B and second flaps 21A, B. These flaps can be of any number, with a minimum of two, and can also be of odd number. The characteristic of the present invention is that the first and second flaps are positioned in different planes, as can be seen in
In the embodiment described here the flaps are four in number, namely two first flaps and two second flaps. Proceeding in a clockwise direction and starting from the first flap 20A, there is a second flap 21A, a further first flap 20B, and a further second flap 21B. The first and second flaps are of circular sector shape with an angle of 90° at the centre. They are mutually offset by 90° such as to completely close the dispensing aperture.
In alternative embodiments, they can have different shapes. Hence in the embodiment of the valve 2I of
If a different number of flaps are provided, the angle at the centre could evidently be greater or lesser. Given the flexibility of the system, the body 2B could have any sectional shape, including square, rectangular, triangular etc., there being also no limit on diameter.
Advantageously the flaps present a thickness S between 0.2 and 3 mm, preferably 0.4 mm.
During the various stages in the use of the valve, the flaps can present various positions by virtue of their flexibility and the flexibility of the material with which they are formed.
In particular they can assume a rest position, represented in
The upper flap can then flex, by virtue of its weight, until it touches the lower flap. In any event, and as stated, a hermetic seal under these conditions is not provided and is not possible.
In this respect, in all cases the flaps would simply rest on each other.
The configuration with flaps provided in two different planes is very advantageous. In fact, using this configuration, the valve and flaps can be formed directly by injection moulding, with flap pre-cutting achieved by vertical mould adjustment. In this manner, in contrast to traditional valves, a further cutting operation subsequent to moulding is not required, and the valve leaves the mould ready for location in the cap and already perfectly functional.
Advantageously when in the rest position (which substantially coincides with the valve having just left the mould) the lower surface of the first flap is spaced from the upper surface of the second flap by a distance d between 0.05 and 1.5 mm, preferably 0.15 mm.
When the pressure inside the container or acting on the valve (or rather on the flaps) is slightly greater than the external pressure, the flaps move into the configuration of
Only a further pressure exerted on the container, to consequently cause an increase in the pressure acting on the valve, results in valve opening determined by the flexure of the flaps.
Essentially, when the valve is subjected to a pressure below a determined value, the flaps, by lying on or resting against each other, form a “seal” which prevents the substance inside the container from emerging. The seal made by the flaps is not an airtight seal, which as shown is not present, but instead a seal against the (dense) substance contained in the container.
The “determined value” of this pressure is a variable which can be set during valve design, by acting on the flap thicknesses S, on the amount of superposing Z between one and another, and on the type and rigidity of the material used to form the valve.
When the pressure inside the container, which acts on the valve, exceeds said “predetermined value”, the flaps flex (see
In conclusion it should be noted that the valve flange 2A has dimensions greater than the seat 7 such that even if the valve becomes released from the undercut, it cannot escape from the container.
It should again be noted that the cap comprises the cover 4, which when in the lowered position (
Advantageously there is also a further seal provided between the cover 4 and the dispensing port, which even further ensures the impossibility of substance leakage when the cover is lowered.
It must be emphasized that the valve in question is particularly advantageous compared with those traditional valves which are cut after moulding.
This is because such valves present flaps which close the dispensing port by abutting against each other. These consequently form a perfect seal and indeed prevent fluid exit, but also prevent air entering in any situation. This generates a constant vacuum in the container, making it uncomfortable to use. In fact it must be almost totally “squeezed” to enable the entire product to be used.
A further drawback which is overcome by the present valve is linked to the possible presence of deposits or substance residues therein. In traditional valves the “sticky” effect of a dry product remained trapped between two abutting flaps is considerable. In fact it is often necessary to exert a much higher pressure than the “design” pressure to enable the substance to be dispensed. This is due to the need to overcome the gluing force between two abutting surfaces pressed together by the elasticity and shape of the valve material. In the current solution the flaps are not urged to rest abuttingly against each other, but instead the seal is given by the flexural rigidity imposed by the flap shape. Hence even if the substance should dry between one flap and another, a slight pressure would be sufficient to remove this block, the flaps being able to mutually move transversely (rising or lowering).
A preferred embodiment of the invention has been described, however others can be conceived by utilizing the same inventive concept.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
MI2010A1243 | Jul 2010 | IT | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1607993 | Loewy | Nov 1926 | A |
3685701 | Kollus | Aug 1972 | A |
3964509 | Daubenberger et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4620648 | Schwartzman | Nov 1986 | A |
4896789 | Federspiel | Jan 1990 | A |
5005737 | Rohr | Apr 1991 | A |
5271531 | Rohr et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
6095381 | Schwanenberg | Aug 2000 | A |
6223956 | Albers | May 2001 | B1 |
6364145 | Shaw et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6726063 | Stull et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7306127 | Eimer | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7500585 | Masuda | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503469 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20020134801 | Stewart | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030189067 | Stull et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20100089921 | Ellenkamp-Van Olst et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0405472 | Jan 1991 | EP |
54039244 | Mar 1979 | JP |
2009056792 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EPO Search Report for Italian patent application No. MI2010A001243 dated Feb. 2, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120006861 A1 | Jan 2012 | US |