The description herein relates to a container for dispensing liquids.
In fast paced industries such as the food industry, there is a high turnover of supplies, as retailers go through large quantities of product, and frequently have to replenish their stocks, requiring them to unload supply trucks, and to transfer the product to their shelves, in the most efficient manner possible, wasting no time or energy in these operations.
Containers are typically packaged in groups of four for transport on freight trucks, and must later be unpacked and transported by hand. A typical 1 gallon container weighs on average over 8 pounds when full, and unloading is a strenuous task.
At the retailers, such as in restaurant kitchens, chefs need to have various ingredients readily available for dispensing, but have limited space. Containers need to be compact, intuitive and easy to use, but also need to be able to withstand operation under less than ideal conditions, with a high frequency of use, including rough handling and bumping.
In other words, the ideal liquid dispensing container is easy to transport from truck to shelf and can be stored in a sturdy stacked configuration, which is compatible with use.
Liquid dispensing containers currently on the market, such as laundry detergent containers or fuel jerrycans, lack in comfort and ease of carry, and also fail to provide any means for stacking. One problem with existing containers is that they typically use an indented grip located on the side or top of the container. Gripping ribs 12 encourage grasping with the user's palm facing down, a position more prone to slippage than the palm up position, and that can lead to higher finger and hand fatigue. The gripping ribs positioned on the handle add grip strength and stability when carrying the container. The frequent side positioning of the handle inevitably leads to wrist discomfort, as the user must counteract the torque induced by the container's weight, since the container's center of gravity is not aligned with the handle and associated lifting force. Another problem with existing containers for this industry is the difficulty in stacking them. Typically made of plastic, their smooth surfaces offer no holds to imbricate other containers, and with additional potential for bulging, stacking is often unfeasible.
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention aim to solve one or more of the aforementioned problems.
A container for storing and dispensing liquids, with at least one stacking feature, a dispenser to dispense liquid contained in the container, a handle for carrying the container, an angle (γ) which is the angle between a line (DD′) perpendicular to a reference lifting plane (Lp) cutting through the handle and a line parallel to a vertical of the container in a filling orientation, and a tilt angle (B) which is the angle between the line (DD′) and a line going through a location of a center of gravity of the filled container in the direction of a weight force of the container. When the container is in a filling orientation the tilt angle (B) and the angle (γ) coincide, while when the container is lifted perpendicular to the lifting plane (Lp), the tilt angle (B) is substantially zero.
A device for storing and dispensing liquids, with feet and corresponding pockets on opposing sides to stack devices next to, or on top of one another; a dispenser to dispense liquid contained in the device; protective ribs to provide structure and prevent bulging; and a t-shaped handle for carrying the device. The t-shaped handle has a top and stem, the top width being greater than the stem width, and at least part of the t-shaped handle is at a non-zero angle from a vertical in a filling orientation.
A more complete appreciation of the depicted embodiments and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
The liquid dispensing container 1 is structurally sound, and capable of containing the liquid weight without any leakage or failures. High density polyethylene or polypropylene are appropriate for this application, being both lightweight and durable, yet allowing for some deformation to be expected from the contents. High density polyethylene or polypropylene are easy materials to manufacture containers from, using a blow molding process. The use of PET in an extrusion molding process would also be possible in this application if a visually clear container were desired. To further strengthen the container, integrated sets of protective strap ribs 5 surround the container and provide reinforcement against excessive bulging. The base of the handle is reinforced by integrated structural reinforcement 13 to prevent failure.
Use tests with chefs were carried out and led to improved dispenser features, stacking features, and handle design. The container is expected to be used in a restaurant kitchen setting, and is designed to provide a corresponding ornamental appearance and functionality. This no-nonsense policy is exemplified by the preferred container's simple and square or rectangular appearance. The container sits reliably on a shelf, and preferably displays no unnecessary frills.
The space between the protective ribs 5 serves as a first label area 7, for content identification. Should this label area be hidden given the stacking orientation of the containers, there exists a second smaller label area 8 located above the dispenser feature for identification of the contents when dispensing. Stacking features 6 consist of protrusions or feet on one side, and corresponding pockets on the other side, to allow chefs to save valuable shelf space with horizontal stacking of the containers. Protrusions and pockets are positioned on either end of their respective container faces, leaving sufficient room for a label to be placed on the container's sides. In an exemplary embodiment protrusions and corresponding pockets may be circular.
The dispenser feature is circular and threaded, with only one turn of thread at full depth. This allows for quick opening and closing, compatible with the anticipated fast paced environment. The dispenser is also, in the filling orientation in a preferred embodiment, flush with the handle feature and on the same side as the handle, making it easier to package, and harder to damage during shipping. The dispenser feature is adjacent to the container's sidewall, such that when pouring contents from the container, there is no ledge onto which the contents could drip. This feature may reduce spillage. Variable dispensing quantities, depending on the product or application, could vary from 1 oz to 8 oz. In an exemplary embodiment, the dispensing feature could also take the form of a thread-on or snap-on device to meter out the liquid by a spigot or measured-dosing means.
Two strap ribs are set in approximately a third of the distance from either end of the container which provides both structural support to the container and a sufficiently sized label panel area.
In an exemplary embodiment, a height H of the handle defined between surfaces BB and EE, as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, a handle top width, as shown in
The preferred embodiment's uses two strap ribs located 3.38″ from one another. Stacking means for the preferred embodiment consist of three feet on a first side face and three pockets on an opposite side face. Three stacking features allow containers to stack reliably and effectively. Two stacking features would not have been as reliable to prevent slippage, while four stacking features would have changed the container shape.
Sizing of the container could range from 32 ounces to 2 gallons (256 ounces) as the container is aimed at the Food Service Industry where bulk quantity product is regularly used. The container weight and shape is also intended to allow carrying of two containers at a time, which would not be feasible for larger containers. In addition, sizing is related to the expected nature of the contents, likely perishable products, so that larger containers would lead to waste, and smaller containers would lead to an undesirable increase in container consumption. The container may be used for instance to hold wing sauces and salad dressings or other liquid food products. Such items, which are frequently used in restaurants, would benefit from the container size and shape, with a container serving the needs of a daily or weekly service volume. The container's contents will last a reasonable period of time to prevent rapid container replenishment yet assure food safety.
Depending on the container fill level 11, its weight and the position of its center of gravity varies, but the handle remains comfortable at any weight. In an exemplary embodiment, the handle itself is hollow, allowing fluid to be present in the handle cavity when the container is carried.
The handle geometry is defined with at least two angles. As shown in
The location of the handle is preferably such that the base of the handle may be above the midline of a container side (e.g., midline M of side Z in
The shape of the handle takes into account comfort and strength considerations, integrated in an ergonomic design, as a result of several group studies with chefs and restaurant personnel.
The geometry of the handle may be such that it is convenient to carry. The gradual width decrease of the handle from top to stem, and its overall orientation allow for an easy grab, a secure carry, and reduced user fatigue. In a preferred embodiment, the handle uses a rounded stem, with radii R1-R4, as indicated on
The handle's shape and dimensions may provide an ergonomic benefit when carrying and handling the containers, developed based on customer surveys for feel and fit. With a typical round or t-shaped knob such as a door knob, users intuitively grab the door knob in their palm, grouping all fingers but the thumb to wrap around the knob, to grip and exert a twisting motion.
Instead, in this application with containers packaged in an upright position, the t-shaped handle faces up, such that the user would position his fingers, thumb excluded, on either side of the handle in a hook-like fashion, and pull palm-up to extract the container from its shipping packaging. The positioning of the handle allows, in a palm-up lifting position, the lifting force to go through the container's center of gravity (CG), thereby minimizing any moment, and associated discomfort. A similar hook-like motion would be used to remove the container from a shelf and pour sauce to dispense. The palm-up position reduces the risk that the holder's hand might slip, when carrying heavy objects, and as such is used by Emergency Medical Technicians to carry stretchers. For chefs whose hands are likely to be wet or slippery when cooking, the ability to use the palm-up grip is a net improvement over existing containers. It is noted that the t-shape handle and its intended intuitive palm up use provides an effective grip for hands of all sizes, whereas smaller or bigger hands may have been limited or inconvenienced by traditional indent handle designs.
The intersection of lifting plane Lp with two lifting planes Lp1 and Lp2, indicated on
In an exemplary embodiment, the angle between the Lp2 plane and the lifting plane Lp, which is effectively angle A previously defined and shown in
As noted above, one of the benefits of the handle positioning in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, is the ability to have the lifting force act through the container's center of gravity (CG), thereby eliminating any moment, and associated discomfort. In particular, the angle (γ) of the lifting plane Lp and its axis CC′, as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the orientation of the handle may depend on at least one of the following parameters: container size, container shape, container contents, which may determine the location of the container's center of gravity, as well as handle location and the angle (γ) of lifting plane Lp. In an exemplary embodiment, the center of gravity of the filled container may be located based on the container size, shape and contents.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the angle (γ) of lifting plane Lp may be the same as the angle between line DD′ and a vertical line passing through the CG, representative of the container weight.
In an exemplary embodiment, angle (γ) is the angle between the line (DD′) and a line parallel to a vertical of the container in a filling orientation and going through a location of a center of gravity of the filled container, such that when the container is not being lifted an angle between the handle and the direction of the weight force is angle gamma, and when the container is lifted perpendicular to the lifting plane (Lp), line DD′ is parallel to the vertical of the container in a filling orientation, and line DD′ goes through the location of the center of gravity of the filled container, such that no moment is exerted.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, line DD′ may be defined as going through both the center of gravity location, and a point X on lifting plane Lp, as shown in
For optimal comfort, in an exemplary embodiment the handle has a stem between 0.5 and 2 inches wide, and a top between 1 and 4 inches wide. In an exemplary embodiment the angle (B) may be referred to as the tilt angle of the handle as measured from the filling orientation's vertical when holding the filled container. In an exemplary embodiment angle (γ) may be identical to angle B. Angle (γ) may be between 10 degrees and 30 degrees. In a preferred embodiment, angle (γ) may be between 15 and 25 degrees, or between 15 and 20 degrees. In yet a more preferred embodiment, angle (γ) may be nominally 18 degrees. In an exemplary embodiment of a filled container, the value chosen for geometric angle (γ) allows the lifting force to pass through the CG location 10, indicated in
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the lifting plane Lp may be perpendicular to line DD′.
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the lifting plane Lp may be at an angle (γ) from a side of the container as defined by line EE in
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the lifting plane Lp may be a horizontal plane defined as parallel to the ground, when the filled container is being held so that the container orientation is determined by gravity as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention the container may be loosely held, with fingers positioned against the surfaces S3 and S4 defined by lifting planes Lp1 and Lp2, such that the container may freely rotate about a pivot point, and the lifting plane Lp is parallel to the ground when the container is being loosely held in a stable configuration. In a preferred embodiment, handle surfaces S3 and S4 are provided so that when the container is carried by the handle, the knuckles of the fingers of the hand holding the handle are substantially parallel to the ground as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a pivot point when loosely holding the container may be point X. In an exemplary embodiment, the handle of the container may further comprise two undersides such that when the container is carried by the handle, knuckles of a hand holding the handle are substantially parallel to the ground, and fingers of the hand press against the two undersides.
In an exemplary embodiment, the handle stem may be rounded with four radii. In an exemplary embodiment, the handle may be hollow, to allow fluid to be present in the handle.
In an exemplary embodiment, a first flat side of the handle stem, and an opposite second side of the handle stem may be not parallel to each other. In an exemplary embodiment, a first flat side of the handle top, and an opposite second side of the handle top may be not parallel to each other.
In an exemplary embodiment, a slant angle of the handle may be the angle between at least one handle side surface which presses on fingers of a user when the container is held, and a plane parallel to a side of the container from which the handle projects, wherein the slant angle is between 26 and 36 degrees.
In an exemplary embodiment, a geometric angle of the handle may be the angle between a line perpendicular to a reference lifting plane (Lp) parallel to the ground in a lifting orientation and cutting through the handle, and a line parallel to a vertical of the container in a filling orientation, and wherein the geometric angle is between 10 and 30 degrees.
In an exemplary embodiment, a midline of a container side may be between the entire handle and the dispenser. In an exemplary embodiment, the handle may be closer to an end of a side of the container from which the handle projects than to the midline of a container side. In an exemplary embodiment, the base of the handle may be located a distance between 0% and 25% of the length of the container side from which the handle extends.
This application claims priority to U.S. Application No. 61/800,297, filed on Mar. 15, 2013, the entire content of which is incorporated in the present document by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2726795 | Billock et al. | Dec 1955 | A |
3400846 | Kelly | Sep 1968 | A |
4957209 | Helin | Sep 1990 | A |
5131572 | Spengler | Jul 1992 | A |
5207338 | Sandhu | May 1993 | A |
D341514 | McGinnis | Nov 1993 | S |
5485920 | Fritz | Jan 1996 | A |
D370379 | Klein et al. | Jun 1996 | S |
5922308 | Brewster et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6050455 | Soehnlen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6196403 | Yamaguchi | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D478009 | Kleckauskas et al. | Aug 2003 | S |
6631744 | Gerhart et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6935533 | Clausen et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7168582 | Darr et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182214 | Darr et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
D587955 | Stamper | Mar 2009 | S |
7874443 | Schutz | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20050051575 | Durivage | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060037929 | Darr et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070246488 | Cash et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080073317 | Dygert et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Mexican Office Action dated May 2, 2016 and issued in Mexican Application No. MX/a/2014/003275. |
Mexican Office Action dated Nov. 7, 2016 and issued in Mexican Application No. MX/a/2014/003275. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140263383 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61800297 | Mar 2013 | US |