This invention relates to dispensing of currency.
Currency dispensers are found, for example, in automatic teller machines (ATMs), including those for so-called off-premises use (for example, at an airport, grocery store, or other location not controlled by a financial institution).
A typical currency dispenser includes a removable money box called a cassette. A stack of currency is loaded into the cassette and then delivered to and loaded into the dispenser.
The dispenser receives signals from control circuitry in the ATM when a user asks for cash. The signals could, for example, instruct the dispenser to dispense $300 in $20 bills to the user.
The dispenser includes paper transporting mechanisms that remove the needed number of bills from the money box, one after another. Each removed bill is fed along a paper path to a position at which the bill is ejected to the outside world, where the user can reach it. The dispenser then signals the control circuitry in the ATM that the needed number of bills has been dispensed.
The sheets of currency that are stacked in the money box sometimes stick together and cannot be easily separated for dispensing. So-called double detection devices are provided in dispensers to detect when more than one paper bill has been removed from the stack. The multiple bills are then discarded into a second money cassette for later pickup, rather than being dispensed to the user.
A typical currency dispenser is constructed of metal pieces, shafts, and bearings that are assembled by a lengthy sequence of steps.
In general, in one aspect, the invention features a method that includes (a) withdrawing currency from a stack of bills for dispensing to a customer, (b) prior to dispensing, detecting a thickness of the withdrawn currency by pushing a free end of an elongated finger by an amount that corresponds to the thickness of the withdrawn currency, and (c) by electromagnetic coupling, determining the amount by which the free end of the elongated finger is pushed.
Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. The pushing of the free end of the elongated finger is done by passing the currency between the finger and a stationary element. The finger is biased to press the currency against the stationary element. The currency is driven across the stationary element after it has been withdrawn from the stack of bills. The currency is driven across the stationary element by passing it through a nip between two rollers, the nip being spaced above the stationary element. The pushing of the free end causes rotation of the finger about an axis. The amount by which the free end is pushed is measured by relative rotation of two electromagnetically coupled elements.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features an apparatus that includes (a) a passage through which currency can be driven, (b) a free end of an elongated finger configured to be moved, when the currency is driven through the passage, by a distance that corresponds to a thickness of the currency, and (c) a pair of coupled elements that are configured to be moved relative to one another by motion of the elongated finger to detect the distance that corresponds to the thickness of the currency.
Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. The passage comprises a supporting surface and a space next to the supporting surface. The movable element comprises one or more fingers projecting into the passage. The fingers have free ends that project generally in the direction in which the currency is driven. The movable element is biased towards a side of the passage. The movable element is connected to the rotational element. The rotational element is spring loaded to bias the movable element. The rotational element comprises a shaft and paddles connected to the shaft. The paddles are configured to be generally parallel to the stationary element. The shaft of the rotational element is generally perpendicular to the stationary element.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method that includes (a) withdrawing currency from a stack of bills for dispensing to a customer, (b) prior to dispensing, detecting a thickness of the withdrawn currency by causing relative rotation between two electromagnetically-coupled elements by an amount that corresponds to the thickness of the withdrawn currency.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features a double detect mechanism for a cash dispenser that includes (a) a passage through which currency can be driven after it is withdrawn from a money box, (b) a finger that lies in the passage and is configured to be moved, when the currency is driven through the passage, through a distance that corresponds to the thickness of the currency, (c) a rotational shaft connected to be rotated when the finger is moved, the rotational shaft bearing paddles, and (d) a circuit board bearing an electromagnetic element that cooperatives with the paddles to measure the amount of rotation of the rotational shaft.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features apparatus that includes a paper path arranged between an opening in a money box through which currency can be withdrawn for dispensing to a customer at a dispensing location that is spaced apart from the opening in the money box, the paper path including rotational shafts arranged to transfer the currency, and a housing that supports the paper path and is configured to receive the money box, the housing comprising at least two parallel spaced-apart molded side walls, the paper path comprising a molded wall or walls between the two parallel molded side walls.
Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. The molded side walls and the third molded wall comprise separate pieces. A molded top wall is configured to support electromechanical drive elements. A bottom wall is also molded. Plastic snap-in bearings are mounted on the parallel side walls and configured to support ends of the rotational shafts. The opening in the money box is at one end of the housing, the dispensing location is at an opposite end of the housing, and the paper path comprises a substantially linear path between the opening in the money box and the dispensing location. A double-detect mechanism is mounted on the paper path at the money box opening. The double-detect mechanism includes a rotating element that is electromagnetically coupled to a detector on a stationary element.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features (1) a currency dispenser comprising a substantially linear paper path arranged between (a) an opening in a money box through which currency can be withdrawn and (b) a dispensing location at which the currency can be dispensed to a customer, the paper path comprising rotational shafts arranged to transfer the currency, (2) a housing configured to support the paper path to receive the money box, the housing including two parallel spaced-apart molded side walls, a third molded side wall between the two parallel molded side walls, a molded top wall configured to support electromechanical drive elements, and a molded bottom wall, the five walls being separate pieces, (3) plastic snap-in bearings mounted on the parallel side walls and configured to support ends of the rotational shafts, and (4) a double-detect mechanism mounted on the paper path at the money box opening, the double-detect mechanism comprising a rotating element that is electromagnetically coupled to a detector on a stationary element.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method that includes (not necessarily in this order): (a) using fasteners to assemble two parallel side walls and a paper path wall between the two parallel side walls to form a housing of a currency dispenser, (b) attaching plastic bearings to the two side walls to mount currency drive shafts across the paper path wall between the two side walls, and (c) attaching a double-detect mechanism on the paper path.
Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. Fasteners are used to assemble the top and bottom walls as part of the housing. The fasteners comprise metal screws. No more than three fasteners are used to assemble the mating edges of each pair of the walls.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features apparatus that includes (a) a molded linear path having a flat supporting surface for currency being driven from a money box at one end of the path to a dispensing location at the other end of the path, (b) a pattern of static electricity grounding elements arranged along the path, and (c) coupling features configured to enable mounting of the path between two side walls of a housing of a currency dispenser. The grounding elements comprise braided wire and metal lugs. The pattern of grounding elements comprises spacing the grounding elements at small enough spacing to dissipate static charge. A double-detect mechanism is mounted on the paper path. Curved surfaces at opposite ends of the flat supporting surfaces are configured to direct currency from the money box onto the linear paper path and from the linear paper path to the dispensing location.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features determining the presence or absence of a flaw in currency being dispensed to a customer, routing the currency either to a dispensing location or to a retention location depending on the detected presence or absence of the flaw, and causing the currency to be routed by default to the retention location in the absence of a determination that a flaw is not present.
Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. The flaw comprises a double bill, or the bill may be too thick. The routing is done by a movable mechanical element in which a series of bills is dispensed one after another, and the default routing is applied only to the first bill in the series after which the remaining bills in the series are routed by default to the dispensing location, unless one of those remaining bills is also determined to be flawed.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features apparatus that includes a double detect mechanism on a paper path of a currency dispenser, and a skew detector upstream of the double detect mechanism along the paper path.
Implementations of the invention may include one or more of the following features. The skew detector includes optical sensors arranged along a direction at an angle to the direction of the paper path and timers configured to determine the timing of the passage of currency along the path relative to the optical sensors. The skew detector also detects a length of the currency. The skew detector is also used for automated jam detection based at least one of the timers exceeding a predetermined period for the bill to clear the sensors.
In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method comprising feeding a bill along a paper path toward a location at which the bill is to be dispensed, optically detecting a skew condition of the bill at a skew sensing location along the path, and after the skew condition has been detected, detecting the presence of a double bill at a location downstream of the skew sensing location.
Other advantages and features will become apparent from the following description and from the claims.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
At the lower end of the paper path a curved surface 48 diverts the bill to a direction of motion that is perpendicular to the direction in which the bill leaves the money box.
At the upper end of the paper path, the traveling bill can either be diverted by a curved surface 50 into a rejected bill collection box 52 (
A bill that is diverted to the dispensing location is driven out of the paper path by a fourth pair of frictional rollers 58 (mounted on a shaft 60) and nip rollers. A bill that is diverted to the collection box is driven by rollers 34 and by a fifth pair of frictional rollers 63 (mounted on a shaft 65) and nip rollers 67. A sixth pair of frictional rollers 69 (mounted a on shaft 71) and nip rollers 73 drives the bill past the curved surface 48 as it is withdrawn from the money box.
As shown also in
The double-detect mechanism determines whether more than one bill has been withdrawn from the money box by measuring the thickness of the bill and comparing it to a maximum thickness value. The thickness is measured by two fingers 80, 82 (
As the bill is grabbed at the nip points between the fingers and the ridges (the nip points are spaced above the curved surface 48) and pulled along the surface 48, the bill forces the fingers upward by a distance equal to the thickness of the bill. As the fingers are pushed upward, they cause a corresponding rotation of the shaft 84. The rotation causes a pair of metal paddles 89 (
The circuitry includes an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter, which receives an analog voltage signal generated by the rotation of the paddles relative to the stationary elements.
The algorithm for determining the thickness proceeds as follows: Before the note is pulled from the cassette, the voltage from the RVIT is read (through the A/D converter) to establish a baseline value for the RVIT. As the note is withdrawn from the cassette, the skew and length are determined, and the note is rejected if these values are outside required limits. Skew is a deviation from a condition in which the leading and trailing edges of the note are perpendicular to the path of travel. Length is the dimension of the note measured along the axis parallel to the normal direction of travel. For the typical note this is the shorter of the two dimensions.
As the note is withdrawn, software samples the A/D thickness readings and looks for a significant change from the baseline value. A significant change indicates that the leading edge of the note is under the fingers. Then, the software begins to sample the thickness at regular intervals (approximately every 2 milliseconds). The readings are sorted into even and odd samples (e.g., the first and third readings are even, and the second and fourth readings are odd). The even samples are added together as they are received. The same is true for the odd samples. The software watches for the thickness values to return to the approximate level of the established baseline, indicating that the trailing edge of the note has been detected. Then the even and odd sampling ceases.
The note thickness algorithm is loosely based on ‘Simpson's Rule’ for approximating the area enclosed by an irregular shape. Briefly (with some simplification), ‘Simpson's Rule’ breaks a shape into narrow strips. The area of the overall shape can be approximated by summing the areas of the strips. The irregular outline of the shape is approximated by fitting a parabola through the endpoints of each pair of adjacent strips.
Simpson's Rule is used to calculate the area of a cross section of the note, namely, of the rectangle presented when the note is viewed on edge along the short side. Since the typical note is not exactly flat as measured by the double detect fingers (there are always bumps, creases, debris, and other factors that affect the actual shape of the cross section), the rectangle of the cross section is always irregular in shape. The data required to utilize Simpson's Rule is a series of measurements of the note thickness at regular intervals. These measurements are taken as the note travels through the note path from the cassette toward the exit. If the note fails to meet the thickness requirements, the vane forces the note into a reject bin, and a new note is pulled from the cassette to replace the rejected note.
The software then applies Simpson's Rule using the formula:
Area=(4*Sum of odd samples)+(2*Sum of even samples)
The Area is divided by the number of samples taken to compensate for the speed of the note as it traveled past the thickness sensor and for notes of varying length. This gives a numeric value proportional to the average thickness of the note.
The output signal of the circuitry representative of the thickness is carried by a conductor 100 (
An algorithm is also provided for determining the skew and length of bills. The algorithm uses information generated from a sensor 72 (
The skew is determined using a hardware timer, three software timers (counters), and sensor 72. The hardware timer is set up to generate an interrupt every 1 millisecond. During an interrupt service routine, a global variable is incremented. This global variable (or count) is used by the main software to time events and to trigger actions.
Before the note is “picked”, the three software counters are set to 0 and the software is set up to begin incrementing these counters every 1 millisecond (based on the global count maintained by the hardware timer). As the note is picked and is removed from the cassette, the sensors are being monitored by the software. One sensor is associated with each of the three software counters, When the leading edge of the note reaches (or blocks) a sensor, the corresponding counter is read and the counter value (number of milliseconds) is stored in a memory location. When all three sensors have been tripped and the software counters are stored for each, then the leading edge skew may be determined. (The counters continue to increment in order to determine the trailing edge skew later.)
To determine the leading edge skew, the software uses the readings from the outer two sensors. The difference between these two values is an indication of the amount of skew present. If this skew is excessive, the note will be rejected.
Meanwhile, assuming the leading edge skew is within allowed limits, the counters are still active to determine the trailing edge skew. As each of the three sensors becomes no longer blocked, the corresponding counter is stopped and read again. When all the sensors are no longer blocked, the difference in the two readings indicates the trailing edge skew.
The length of the note is determined using the same software counters used by the skew calculations. For this calculation, the value for each counter that was read at the leading edge is subtracted from the value read at the trailing edge. This gives three values for the “length” of the note at three locations along the note. The three “length” values are then averaged to determine the average “length” of the note (in milliseconds). The resulting calculated length is compared to a standard value and the note is rejected if out of limits.
The skew sensors are also used for jam detection. Of one or more of the three sensors indicates an excessive time for the bill to clear the sensors, a jam is assumed to be likely and a jam recovery routine is initiated to restore operation to normal, including completing the transaction during which the jam occurred.
Among the advantages of providing a skew and length sensor immediately ahead of, but separately from the double detect mechanism are simplicity of construction and operation, accuracy of both the double detection and the skew detection, and jam detection and recovery which permits unattended operation.
Also mounted on the top wall are two motors 110, 112 (
Photoelectronic sensors 120 (
The control circuitry uses information from the sensors and from external circuitry located in the ATM to control accurately the motors and the vane to dispense bills in accordance with the customer's request and to reject bills that fail the double-detect testing.
The housing of the dispenser is assembled using four walls 140, 142, 144, 146 (
As shown in
Each of the shafts 65, 42, 58, 40, 38, 69 is held by and terminates at one end at one of the snap-in bearings. At the other end, each of the shafts projects beyond the snap-in bearing to support one of the gears.
The bearing support flange of side wall 142 also holds the shaft that is used to drive the internal mechanism of the money box.
Both side walls bear stiffening ridges and other stiffening features as shown.
The top and bottom walls 144, 146 also bear stiffening features and are connected to the side walls by metal screws 302 (
Rear wall 148, which defines the flat linear portion of the paper path and the curved feeding surfaces at each end of the linear portion, is mounted between the two side walls using three screws 172 (
The paper path is defined by a channel 171 (
When the money box is inserted into the housing, a key (not shown) enters a slot (not shown) in the front wall of the money box. The key triggers a mechanism (not shown) that opens a window (not shown), permitting a drive wheel 178 (
A pattern of electrical discharge points 304, 306, 308, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 322 (
Because the dispenser is assembled from a small number of lightweight, easy to manipulate parts, assembly is fast and inexpensive, and the resulting dispenser is small, lightweight, and inexpensive. Maintenance can be done easily and inexpensively in case any part breaks or malfunctions.
Construction of the dispenser proceeds in the following sequence. The dispenser is designed for z-axis assembly. First, bearings and small components are installed on the left and right sidewalls. Then the bottom and top walls are installed on the left sidewall using screws. Then shafts and paper paths are installed on left sidewall. The right sidewall is then installed over all the locations established by the earlier parts. Subassemblies such as cassette motor drive, money box motor drive, paper path drive, and the control boards are then installed on the top wall, and the sensors are installed. Electrical harnesses are installed after every other part is assembled. The z-axis assembly technique allows fast and accurate placement of components.
Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US02/32177 | Oct 2002 | WO | international |
This is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit of priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/973,186, filed Oct. 9, 2001, and claims priority from a corresponding PCT Application filed Oct. 8, 2002, for DISPENSING OF CURRENCY, Gregory Jantsch, inventor, which are incorporated here in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3239213 | Griswold | Mar 1966 | A |
3668398 | Doering | Jun 1972 | A |
3795395 | Ransom et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
4009379 | Musch | Feb 1977 | A |
4055341 | Martinez | Oct 1977 | A |
4095159 | Tirelli | Jun 1978 | A |
4154437 | Butcheck et al. | May 1979 | A |
4156620 | Clemens | May 1979 | A |
4159782 | Swartzendruber | Jul 1979 | A |
4378109 | Takahashi | Mar 1983 | A |
4398711 | Horst et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4420747 | Kistner | Dec 1983 | A |
4462587 | Graef et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4494747 | Graef et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4524268 | Fukatsu | Jun 1985 | A |
4550252 | Tee | Oct 1985 | A |
4559452 | Igaki et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4577779 | Atalla | Mar 1986 | A |
4664369 | Graef et al. | May 1987 | A |
4672750 | Storace et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4693010 | Sills | Sep 1987 | A |
4700368 | Munn et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4711532 | Choe | Dec 1987 | A |
4715007 | Fujita et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4729556 | Fujii et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4731523 | Kozima | Mar 1988 | A |
4753433 | Rodi et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4776071 | Yoshizawa | Oct 1988 | A |
4836528 | Geiser | Jun 1989 | A |
4879513 | Spiegel et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5011128 | Tsuji | Apr 1991 | A |
5075622 | Konii et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5094678 | Kramer et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100022 | Fukudome et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5174562 | Mizunaga et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5183999 | Hakenewerth et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5203555 | Cannaverde | Apr 1993 | A |
5207788 | Geib et al. | May 1993 | A |
5577720 | Laskowski | Nov 1996 | A |
5701178 | Burns et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5704607 | Brotherston | Jan 1998 | A |
5712804 | Elbling | Jan 1998 | A |
5813510 | Rademacher | Sep 1998 | A |
5967364 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971392 | Lee | Oct 1999 | A |
6000693 | Tranquilla | Dec 1999 | A |
6006989 | Ademmer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6082731 | Yamazaki | Jul 2000 | A |
6109522 | Force et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6189881 | Bolton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6237847 | Milne | May 2001 | B1 |
6329813 | Andermo | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6378770 | Clark et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
20010011659 | Izawa et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020119346 | Naoe et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030089769 | Jantsch | May 2003 | A1 |
20040096665 | Hoehne et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099725 | Jantsch | May 2004 | A1 |
20040123930 | Nakamura | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040188928 | Tanabe | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050098622 | Jantsch | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
29 16 096 | Oct 1979 | DE |
0 064 523 | Nov 1982 | EP |
0 170 341 | Feb 1986 | EP |
0 280 147 | Aug 1988 | EP |
0 344 938 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0 356 150 | Feb 1990 | EP |
0 569 606 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 690 288 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 881 605 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 897 165 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1 008 965 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 344 986 | Jan 1974 | GB |
1 497 181 | Jan 1978 | GB |
2 129 126 | May 1984 | GB |
2 218 524 | Nov 1989 | GB |
60052427 | Mar 1985 | JP |
62256808 | Nov 1987 | JP |
63-256808 | Oct 1988 | JP |
63256808 | Oct 1988 | JP |
08239141 | Sep 1996 | JP |
10319682 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H10-320624 | Dec 1998 | JP |
H11-7573 | Jan 1999 | JP |
A H11-328487 | Nov 1999 | JP |
196492 | May 1967 | RU |
WO 8201698 | May 1982 | WO |
WO 8600160 | Mar 1986 | WO |
WO 9928846 | Jun 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030089769 A1 | May 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09973186 | Oct 2001 | US |
Child | 10269851 | US |