Dispersion compensating optical fiber

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6546178
  • Patent Number
    6,546,178
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 11, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 8, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed is a dispersion compensating optical fiber that includes a core surrounded by a cladding layer of refractive index Δc. The core includes at least three radially adjacent regions, a central core region having Δ1, a moat region having a refractive index Δ2 and an annular ring region having a refractive index Δ3, such that Δ1>Δ3>Δc>Δ2. The fiber exhibits a dispersion at 1550 which is less than −30 ps/nm/km, and a κ value obtained by dividing the dispersion value by the dispersion slope which is between 40 and 100.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to dispersion compensating optical fibers that are suitable for use in wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) systems, more particularly to dispersion compensating fibers that are particularly well suited for use in the C-band and L-band operating windows.




2. Technical Background




To meet the ongoing drive for more bandwidth at lower costs, telecommunications system designers are turning to high channel count dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) architectures, longer reach systems and higher transmission bit rates. This evolution makes chromatic dispersion management critical to system performance, as system designers now desire the ability to accurately compensate dispersion across entire channel plans. Typically, the only viable broadband commercial technology to battle dispersion has been dispersion compensating fibers (DCF) modules. As DWDM deployments increase to 16, 32, 40 and more channels, broadband dispersion compensating products are desired. Telecommunications systems presently in place include single-mode optical fibers which are designed to enable transmission of signals at wavelengths around 1550 nm in order to utilize the effective and reliable erbium fiber amplifiers.




One such fiber, LEAF optical fiber, manufactured by Corning Inc., is a positive nonzero dispersion shifted fiber (+NZDSF), and has become the optical fiber of choice for many new system deployments due to its inherently low dispersion and economic advantage over conventional single mode fibers.




With continuing interest in going to even higher bit rates (>40 Gbs), Ultra-long reach systems (>1000 km) and optical networking, it will become imperative to use DCFs in networks that carry data on Non-Zero Dispersion shifted fiber (NZ-DSF) as well. The early versions of DCF's, those developed for single mode fibers, when used in combination with NZ-DSF fibers effectively compensated dispersion at only one wavelength. However, high bit rates, longer reaches and wider bandwidths require dispersion slope to be compensated more exactly. Consequently, it is desirable for the DCF to have dispersion characteristics such that its dispersion and dispersion slope is matched to that of the transmission fiber it is required to compensate. The ratio of dispersion to dispersion slope at a given wavelength is referred to as “kappa (κ)”. Kappa changes as a function of wavelength for a given transmission fiber. Hence, it is equally important that as we migrate to Ultra broadband networks that the kappa value of the DCF is matched to that of the transmission fiber at more than one wavelength.




It would be desirable to develop alternative dispersion compensating fibers, particularly ones having the ability to compensate for dispersion of non-zero dispersion shifted fibers and other positive dispersion optical fibers over a wide wavelength band around 1550 nm.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of the present invention relates to a dispersion compensating optical fiber which comprises a core refractive index profile which is selected to result in a fiber which exhibits negative dispersion less than −30 ps/nm/km and a kappa value between 40 and 60. The kappa (κ) value of a DC fiber is defined herein as:






κ=(


D




DC


)/(


D


Slope


DC


)






where D


DC


and DSlope


DC


are the chromatic dispersion and dispersion slope of the DC fiber, respectively, the dispersion value being measured at 1550 nm, and the dispersion slope being measured over the wavelength range of 1530 to 1560 nm.




The negative dispersion slope of the fibers of the invention is less than −1.0 ps/nm


2


/km, over the wavelength range 1530 to 1560 nm. In one preferred embodiment, the dispersion slope is between about −1.5 and −3.0 ps/nm


2


/km, and in another preferred embodiment, the dispersion slope is between about −1.8 and −2.5 ps/nm


2


/km over the wavelength range 1530 to 1560 nm.




The fibers of the present invention also exhibit a very negative dispersion at 1550 nm, i.e., less than −30 ps/nm/km. The preferred fibers of the present invention exhibit a dispersion at 1550 nm which less than −50 ps/nm/km, more preferably less than −70 ps/nm/km, and most preferably less than −100 ps/nm/km.




Preferred fibers in accordance with the present invention exhibit a kappa value at 1550 nm between 40 and 60. The desired kappa may thus be selected depending on the long haul fiber that is to be compensated. This preferred embodiment is especially useful for compensating the dispersion created in the C-band (e.g., 1530-1565) by an optical communication system which utilizes LEAF® optical fiber.




Fibers disclosed herein may also be used in the L-band (1565-1625 nm). In particular, we have found that insertion losses are achievable which are suitable for making the fibers of the present invention suitable for use in the L-band, i.e., less than 1 dB per kilometer. The fibers which are L-band compatible exhibit a κ at 1590 nm which is also greater than 50.




All of the above described properties are achievable utilizing fiber having a refractive index profile which comprises a central segment having a relative refractive index Δ


1


, a second annular segment surrounding the central core segment having relative refractive index Δ


2


, a third annular segment which surrounds said second segment having relative refractive index Δ


3


and a cladding layer having relative refractive index Δc, wherein Δ


1





3





2


and:






Δ
=



(


n
1
2

-

n
c
2


)


2






n
1
2



×
100











Preferably, the refractive index profile is selected so that the ratio of the refractive index Δ of the second core segment to that of the first core segment (Δ


2





1


) is greater than −0.4. More preferably, the ratio of the deltas of the second segment to the first segment Δ


2





1


is greater than −0.37. Also, preferably, Δ


1





3


>Δc>Δ


2


.




If the negative dispersion slope of the fiber is made less than −0.08 ps/nm


2


/km, the fibers will have particular utility for compensating the dispersion for large effective area (greater than 50, more preferably greater than 60, and most preferably greater than 65) nonzero dispersion shifted fibers. One such fiber, Corning's LEAF® fiber, is a optical fiber having a zero dispersion wavelength outside the range of 1530-1565, and an effective area greater than 70 square microns. LEAF fiber's larger effective area offers higher power handling capability, higher optical signal to noise ratio, longer amplifier spacing, and maximum dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) channel plan flexibility. Utilizing a larger effective area also provides the ability to uniformly reduce nonlinear effects. Nonlinear effects are perhaps the greatest performance limitation in today's multi-channel DWDM systems. The dispersion compensating fibers disclosed herein are exceptional in their ability to compensate for the dispersion of NZDSF fibers, in particular Corning's LEAF fiber. LEAF optical fiber nominally exhibits an effective area of 72 square microns and a total dispersion of 2-6 ps/nm/km over the range 1530-1565.




Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the invention as described herein, including the detailed description which follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.




It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are merely exemplary of the invention, and are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the invention as it is claimed. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operation of the invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1-4

illustrate refractive index profiles of fibers made in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 5

illustrates insertion loss as a function of wavelength for a C and L-band fiber made in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 6

illustrates residual dispersion per unit length as a function of wavelength when a C and L band dispersion compensating fiber made in accordance with the invention are used in combination with Corning LEAF® optical fiber.





FIG. 7

illustrates a refractive index profile of a fiber made in accordance with the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, an example of which is illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. An exemplary embodiment of a refractive index profile of a fiber in accordance with the present invention is shown in FIG.


1


.




Refractive index profile


10


consists of a central up-doped region


12


having peak Δ


1


which is surrounded by a first down-doped moat region


14


having peak negative Δ


2


, which is in turn surrounded by annular ring and a second up-doped region


16


having peak Δ


3


, all of which are surrounded by cladding region


18


. Preferably, regions


12


and


16


are formed using germania doped SiO


2


, although other forms of index refraction increasing dopants could also be employed to achieve the fibers disclosed herein, so long as the same general refractive index profile is achieved. Likewise, whereas region


14


is preferably formed using fluorine doped SiO


2


, other index of refraction decreasing dopants could be employed besides fluorine. Cladding region


18


is preferably formed of silica. However, cladding region


13


could also include index of refraction increasing or decreasing in dopants, so long as the Δ versus radius relationship illustrated is maintained.




In one embodiment of the dispersion slope compensating optical fiber illustrated in

FIG. 1

, Δ


1


ranges between 1.0 and 2.5 percent and comprises an outer radius r


1


(in

FIG. 1

, r


1


is drawn to the point where the profile intersects the x-axis) between about 1 to 3 microns, Δ


2


is less than about −0.3 percent, more preferably less than −0.4 percent, and has an outer radius r


2


which ranges between about 3.5 and 8 microns, and Δ


3


is between about 0.2 to 1.2 percent and comprises a center radius r


3


(drawn to the center of the segment) between about 5 to 12 microns outer radius, as used herein, means the distance measured from the centerline of the optical fiber to the outer region of the segment, i.e., where the outer region of the index segment intersects the x-axis (which is also equal to the index of the cladding material


18


). Center radius, on the other hand, is measured to the center of the core segment.




More preferably, Δ


1


of segment


12


is between 1.2 and 2.2 percent and comprises an outer radius r


1


between about 1 to 2 microns, Δ


2


of segment


14


is between than about −0.5 and −1.0 percent, and has an outer radius r


2


between about 4 and 7 microns.




The third annular segment


16


can vary more in Δ versus radial dimension than segments


12


and


14


. For example, higher and narrower annular rings segment


16


may be replaced by shorter and wider annular ring segment


16


to achieve fiber exhibiting the desired properties in accordance with the invention. For example, in one more preferred embodiment, the third annular segment


16


may be selected from the group consisting of a) a Δ


3


between about 0.5 to 1.0 percent and a center radius of 5 to 12 microns, and a half-height width between about 0.5 to 2.5 microns, and b) a Δ


3


between about 0.1 to 0.5 percent, a center radius of 6 to 12 microns, and a half-height width between about 1.5 to 3 microns.




Most preferably Δ


1


of segment


12


is between 1.0 and 2.5 percent and comprises an outer radius between about 1 to 3 microns, Δ


2


of segment


14


is less than about −0.5 percent, and has outer radius r


2


between about 3.5 and 8 microns, and Δ


3


of segment


16


is between about 0.2 to 1.0 percent and comprises a center radius r


3


between about 5 to 12 microns.




Fibers made in accordance with the invention may also exhibit a fiber cut off wavelength which is higher than the C or L band (i.e. higher than 1650 nm). Consequently, when clad with silica cladding, the fibers disclosed herein are few moded, rather than single mode, at 1550 nm. Conversely, previous prior art dispersion compensating fibers have been designed to support only one mode in the transmission window of interest. Long haul fibers designed to be few moded with high fiber cutoff wavelengths often support only one mode in the cable as the cabling process reduces the cutoff wavelength. The primary reason why these fibers support only one mode in the cable is because of the fact that the cabling process induces random stress points on the fiber which in turn help in dissipating the energy from the higher order mode. However, in the case of the dispersion compensating fiber module, there is no cabling process and hence, in general, one should not expect any decrease in the cutoff wavelength after the fiber is made. Hence, we would expect that if the fiber supports two (or maybe even three modes) in the fiber form in the 1550 nm operating wavelength, the same fiber will support the same number of modes in the module form as well. However, it should be noted that the fibers disclosed in here do not necessarily have to be employed only in dispersion compensating modules, and instead the fibers could be employed in dispersion compensating fiber cables (rather than enclosed modules that are typically employed in boxes).




However, we have found that, if a DC fiber supports more than one mode, the cross-talk created during the propagation of the higher order modes over a length (e.g. greater than 100 meters, more preferably greater than 500 meters) of straight fiber is 30 dB or less. Consequently, it is possible for dispersion compensating fibers that support more than one mode to have minimal impact on system performance. Moreover, deploying such dispersion compensating fibers in modules wound around a hub of a diameter between about three to five inches, will induce additional stress, and bending of higher order modes will further decrease model noise. Consequently, in a preferred embodiment, the dispersion compensating optical fibers disclosed herein are deployed in such dispersion compensating modules wherein the fiber is wound around a hub. Preferably the hub is cylindrical, and has a diameter of less than about 12 inches, more preferably less than about 10 inches, and most preferably less than about 6 inches, and the length of fiber deployed therein is greater than 100 meters, more preferably greater than 500 meters.




Thus, it is possible to decrease the bend sensitivity of the dispersion compensating fiber by designing the fiber to have a high fiber cut off wavelength. In addition, the fiber design may be modified to increase the fiber cut off wavelength without effecting any of the other optical properties deleteriously.




EXAMPLES




The invention will be further illustrated by the following examples which are meant to be illustrative and an exemplary of the invention.




In Example 1, a fiber having the refractive index profile illustrated in

FIG. 1

was made having a central core region


12


with peak Δ=1.85 percent and an outer radius r


1


of 1.6 microns, a moat Δ in region


14


of about −0.65 and an outer radius r


2


of 5.4 microns (and an average moat Δ equal to about −0.55) and a ring peak Δ equal to about 0.56 with a ring center radius (measured to the center of the core segment) of about 7.8 microns and a half height width of about 1 micron. The raised index regions


12


and


16


were formed using germania doping, and the lowered index region


14


was formed using fluorine doping. Outer clad region


18


was pure silica, and the outer diameter of the resultant fiber was 125 microns. The resultant fiber exhibited a dispersion at 1550 of approximately −107 ps/nm/km, a dispersion slope of about −1.18 and a κ value of about 90. The effective area of this fiber was approximately 16 square microns, and the fiber cutoff wavelength was longer than 1650, the detection limit of the equipment. In fact, for all of the fibers disclosed herein, the fiber cutoff wavelength was too high to be measured using current equipment.




Additional examples of embodiments in accordance with the invention are listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3. The corresponding Δ versus radius relationships of each of these examples is set forth in Table 1 below, wherein the radius of the Δ


1


and Δ


2


segments is an outer radius, and the radius of Δ


3


is a center radius. Also set forth for Δ


3


is the half height width. All of the radius and half-height width values are set forth in microns. Also set forth are the corresponding dispersion properties, including dispersion measured at 1550 nm, dispersion slope over the wavelength range 1530-1560, kappa κ as defined above, and fiber cut off wavelength. Examples 2 and 3 are very similar in appearance to

FIG. 1

, in that, in both such examples, the annular ring segment


16


is a triangular annular ring. On the other hand, examples 4, 6, and 7 are similar to the embodiment illustrated in

FIG. 2

in that they employ annular ring segments


16


which are rounded or gaussian in shape. The Example 5 embodiment is illustrated in FIG.


3


.




Fibers described in Tables 1 and 2 fall within a particularly preferred range of refractive index profiles in accordance with the invention, in which Δ


1


ranges between 1.5 and 2.2 percent and comprises an outer radius r


1


(drawn to the point where the profile intersects the x-axis) between about 1 to 3 microns, Δ


2


is less than about −0.4 percent, and has an outer radius r


2


which ranges between about 4.5 and 7.5 microns, and Δ


3


is between about 0.2 to 1.2 percent and comprises a center radius r


3


(drawn to the center of the segment) between about 5 to 12 microns outer radius, as used herein, means the distance measured from the centerline of the optical fiber to the outer region of the segment, e.g., where the outer region of the index segment intersects the x-axis (which is also equal to the index of the cladding material


18


). Center radius, on the other hand, is measured to the center of the core segment.
























TABLE 1












Outer





Outer





Ctr.




H. Ht.












r


1







r


2







r


3






Width







Fiber







Δ1




(μm)




Δ2




(μm)




Δ3




(μm)




(μm)




D


1550






D


slope






K




cutoff



































Ex. 2




1.86




1.6




−.66




5.4




.56




7.8




2




−104




−1.15




91




>1650






Ex. 3




2.02




1.7




−.68




5




.88




7




1




−183




−1.93




95




>1650






Ex. 4




2.1




1.7




−.6




5




.48




10.1




1.9




−75




−1




75




>1650






Ex. 5




1.7




1.4




−.45




6.6




.2




8.8




4.3




−163




−3.38




49




>1650






Ex. 6




2.06




1.79




−.6




5.14




4.82




10.1




2




−141




−2.11




66




>1650














As the role of waveguide dispersion is made larger in order to attain DCF's with ultra high negative dispersion slopes, the DCFs become more bend sensitive. One way to reduce the bend sensitivity of the fiber is to reduce the effective area of the fiber. This however can have negative impact on the system performance via increased non-linear effects. Hence, proper design of a DCF with high negative dispersion slope for broadband WDM systems requires a careful optimization of the bend sensitivity of the fiber while keeping the effective area of the fiber as large as possible.




The effective area of all of the examples in Table 1 were between 15 and 17 μm


2


and attenuation was less than 1 dB/km. All of the results shown in Table 1 above are for fibers that were drawn to 125 micron diameter fiber. These resultant properties can be modified to some extent by drawing the optical fibers to larger or smaller diameters. For example, when the profile disclosed in

FIG. 2

was drawn to a diameter of 120 microns, the dispersion at 1550 was −232 ps/nm/km, the dispersion slope was−2.52 ps/nm


2


/km, and the ic value remained at about 92.




The fiber described in Table 2 below has excellent utility as a fiber for use in the L-band to compensate for the dispersion created in optical communications systems which employ LEAF fiber. The properties at 1590 nm for this fiber are set forth in Table 2. At 1550, the Example 7 fiber exhibits a κ value of about 92, a dispersion of−84 ps/nm/km, and a dispersion slope of −0.9 ps/nm


2


/km.

























TABLE 2












Outer





Outer





Ctr.




H. Ht.







Fiber








Δ1




r


1






Δ2




r


2






Δ3




R


3






Width




D


1590






D


slope






K


1590






cutoff




MFD


1559






































Ex. 7




1.88




1.64




−.65




5.25




.32




7.63




1.61




−84




−0.9




92




0.55




4.75














Consequently, in one embodiment which is optimized to enable broadband dispersion compensation for LEAF fiber across both the C-band and L-band, a first fiber (e.g. Example 5) may be employed to compensate for dispersion across the C-band, and a second fiber, (e.g., Example 7) may be employed to compensate for dispersion across the L-band. These two fibers could therefore be employed together within a single dispersion compensating module to compensate for dispersion over both the C-band (e.g., 1530-1565 nm) and L-band (e.g., 1565-1625 nm) transmission windows. These two fibers in combination are capable of extremely good dispersion compensation of optical communications systems which employ LEAF optical fiber. Such optical communications systems typically consists of, for example, at least a signal transmitter and signal receiver, and one or more dispersion compensating modules over the path of communication to compensate for dispersion which builds up in the transmitted signal.





FIG. 5

illustrates a plot of absolute insertion losses of these two fibers made in accordance with the invention, a first fiber


30


(Example 5) having a κ of 48 at 1550 and a second fiber


32


(Example 7) having a κ of 92 at 1590 nm. As can be seen from

FIG. 5

, the lower κ of the Example 5 fiber is very well suited for dispersion and dispersion slope compensation of Corning's LEAF optical fiber in the C-band, with relative flat insertion loss across the C-band. Similarly, the higher κ of the Example 7 fiber is well suited for dispersion and dispersion slope compensation of LEAF in the L band. The bend edge of the fiber does not start until 1615 nm.




Based on the fiber loss per unit length shown for Examples 5 and 7 in Tables 1 and 2 and insertion loss numbers for the module shown in

FIG. 8

, we can see that a substantial portion of the module loss comes from the splices.




In

FIG. 6

we show the residual dispersion as a function of wavelength while using the C-band fiber


30


(κ=49) in the C-band and the L-band fiber


32


(κ=92) in the L-band. As can be seen the residual dispersion across the C and the L-band combined band is less than +/−0.25 ps/nm-km.




The true impact of dispersion slope compensation can only be realized in systems where the edge channels are dispersion limited. Generally speaking, edge channels in Ultra-broad band (>40 nm bandwidth) and long haul systems (up to 600 km) or Ultra long haul (>1000 km) and broadband (32 nm) systems are expected to be dispersion limited. However, in either case because of the complexity of the system and the very large number of components required to make the system work effectively, it is extremely difficult to know if the edge channels are truly in a dispersion limited regime. Hence, it is difficult to evaluate the true impact of these very high negative slope dispersion compensating fibers. However, in a re-circulating loop (125 km loop) test conducted with 32 channels in the C-band it was found that ever after 6 round trips all of the channels had a Q that was greater than 8.5 dB.





FIG. 4

illustrates an alternative embodiment of the invention having a relatively wider annular segment


16


compared to the other embodiments. Examples 8, 9, and 10 have profiles similar to those in FIG.


4


and having the parameters as set forth in Table 3. Fibers described in Table 3 fall within a particularly preferred range of refractive index profiles in accordance with the invention, in which Δ


1


ranges between 1.0 and 2.0 percent and comprises an outer radius r


1


(drawn to the point where the profile intersects the x-axis) between about 1 to 3 microns, Δ


2


is less than about −0.3 percent, and has an outer radius r


2


which ranges between about 4.0 and 7.0 microns, and Δ


3


is between about 0.2 to 0.8 percent and comprises a center radius r


3


(drawn to the center of the segment) between about 7 to 12 microns, and a Δ


3


half height peak width of about 5 to 10 microns. The profiles are particular good for obtaining low kappas at 1550 nm, e.g. between about 45 and 65.























TABLE 3












Outer





Outer





Ctr.




H. Ht.











r


1







r


2







r


3






Width







Δ1




(μm)




Δ2




(μm)




Δ3




(μm)




(μm)




D


1550






D


slope






Kappa


































Ex. 8




1.5




2.2




−.35




5.2




.3




10




8.5




−90




−1.45




62






Ex. 9




1.5




2.2




−.50




5.0




.25




9.0




5.5




−128




−2.31




55






Ex. 10




1.7




2.1




−.60




4.5




.25




9.5




8.0




−165




−3.3




50

































TABLE 4












Outer





Outer





Ctr.




H. Ht.











r


1







r


2







r


3






Width







Δ1




(μm)




Δ2




(μm)




Δ3




(μm)




(μm)




D


1550






D


slope






Kappa


































Ex. 11




1.8




1.8




−.69




5.0




0.7




7.5




0.9




−120




−1.6




75















FIG. 7

illustrates another embodiment of the slope compensating optical fiber in accordance with the present invention. This embodiment best illustrates the spacing of the up-doped ring region


116


away from the outer diameter r


2


of the down-doped moat region


114


. In this embodiment of the fiber, designated as example 11 in Table 4 above, the fiber profile


110


shown in

FIG. 7

provides a dispersion at 1550 nm which is between about −30 and −200 ps/nm/km; a dispersion slope less than −1.1 ps/nm


2


/km; and a kappa value between 40 and 95. This provides a fiber that may compensate for both slope and dispersion by exhibiting a relatively large negative slope and relatively large negative dispersion. More preferably, the dispersion slope compensating optical fiber in accordance with the invention includes a dispersion at 1550 nm which is between −90 and −150 ps/nm/km; a dispersion slope less than −1.5 ps/nm


2


/km; and a kappa value between 40 and 95. The above-mentioned dispersion slope compensating optical fiber preferably includes a refractive index profile


110


as shown in

FIG. 7

having a central segment


112


having a Δ


1


and an outer radius r


1


and a second annular moat segment


114


having a Δ


2


and having an outer radius r


2


wherein, preferably, r


1


is less than 2.0 microns and r


2


is between 4.0 and 7.0 microns and wherein the core moat ratio taken as r


1


divided by r


2


is less than 0.38, and more preferably less than 0.34.




The preferred embodiment of the profile


110


has a Δ


1


between about 1.6 percent to 2.0 percent. The outer radius r


1


of the central core region


112


is located at between about 1.5 to 2.0 microns. The annular moat region


114


surrounding and in contact with the central region


112


has a Δ


2


which is preferably less than about −0.6 percent and has an outer radius r


2


between about 4.5 and 6 microns. The spaced ring region


116


includes Δ


3


is between about 0.4 to 0.8 percent and comprises a center radius r


3


between about 6 to 10 microns. Preferably the peak of the region


116


is located such that r


3


is spaced from r


2


by greater than 1.0 microns, and more preferably greater than 2 microns.




A dispersion compensating optical fiber in accordance with the invention that is particularly effective at compensating for dispersion or dispersion slope in the C and L bands has a refractive index profile, as shown in

FIG. 7

, which is selected to result in a dispersion slope in said fiber which is less than −1.5 ps/nm


2


/km over the wavelength range 1525 to 1565 nm; a dispersion at 1550 nm which is less than −75 ps/nm/km; and a kappa value, obtained by dividing the dispersion by the dispersion slope, that is between 40 and 90. The refractive index profile of said fiber comprises a central segment having a Δ


1


, a second annular segment which surrounds said central segment having Δ


2


, a third annular segment which surrounds said second segment having Δ


3


and a cladding layer comprising Δc, wherein Δ


1





3


>Δc>Δ


2


.




In accordance with another embodiment, a dispersion compensating fiber includes a refractive index profile selected to result in a dispersion slope in said fiber which is less than −0.8 ps/nm


2


/km over the wavelength range 1525 to 1565 nm; a dispersion at 1550 nm which is less than −100 ps/nm/km; and a kappa value obtained by dividing the dispersion by the dispersion slope, that is between 40 and 90. The refractive index profile of this embodiment of fiber comprises a central segment having a Δ


1


and an outer radius r


1


, a second annular segment which surrounds the central segment having a Δ


2


and an outer radius r


2


, a third annular segment which surrounds the second segment having a Δ


3


and a cladding layer comprising Δc, wherein Δ


1





3


>Δc>Δ


2


, and wherein the core moat ratio r


1


/r


2


is less than 0.4.




It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. A dispersion compensating optical fiber comprising:a refractive index profile selected to result in a dispersion at 1550 nm which is less than −30 ps/mn/km; a kappa value obtained by dividing the dispersion at 1550 nm by a dispersion slope at 1550 nm of between 40 and 60; and a central segment within the refractive index profile having a Δ1 and an outer radius r1, a second annular segment within the profile which surrounds the central segment having a Δ2 and an outer radius r2, a third annular segment in the profile which surrounds the second segment having a Δ3, and a cladding layer comprising Δc, wherein Δ1>Δ3>Δc>Δ2.
  • 2. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein a core moat ratio r1/r2 is less than 0.36.
  • 3. The dispersion slope compensating optical fiber of claim 2 wherein the core moat ratio is less than 0.34.
  • 4. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein a dispersion slope of the fiber is less than −0.8 ps/nm2/km over the wavelength range 1525 to 1565 nm.
  • 5. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 4 wherein the dispersion slope is less than −1.5 ps/nm2/km over a wavelength range 1525 to 1565 nm.
  • 6. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein dispersion slope is between about −1.5 and −3.0 ps/nm2/km over the wavelength range 1530 to 1560 nm.
  • 7. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 6 wherein dispersion slope is between about −1.8 and −2.5 ps/nm2/km over the wavelength range 1530 to 1560 nm.
  • 8. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein the dispersion at 1550 nm is less than −50 ps/nm/km.
  • 9. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein the dispersion at 1550 nm is less than −75 ps/nmn/km.
  • 10. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein the dispersion at 1550 nm is less than −100 ps/nm/km.
  • 11. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein a dispersion slope is less than −1.5 ps/nm2/km at 1550 nm and the dispersion is less than −70 ps/nm/km at 1550 nm.
  • 12. The dispersion slope compensating optical fiber of claim 1, whereinΔ1 is between 1.0 and 2.5 percent and comprises an outer radius r1 between about 1 to 3 microns, Δ2 is less than about −0.4 percent, and comprises an outer radius r2 between about 3.5 and 8 microns, and Δ3 is between about 0.2 to 1.0 percent and comprises a center radius r3 between about 5 to 12 microns.
  • 13. The dispersion slope compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein Δ1 is between 1.0 and 2.5 percent and comprises an outer radius r1 between about 1 to 3 microns, Δ2 is less than about −0.4 percent, and comprises an outer radius r2 between about 3.5 and 8 microns, and Δ3 is between about 0.2 to 1.0 percent and comprises a center radius r3 between about 5 to 12 microns.
  • 14. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 further comprising:a dispersion at 1550 nm which is greater than −200; and the central segment has an outer radius r1 and the second annular segment has an outer radius r2 and the core moat ratio taken as r1 divided by r2 is less than 0.4.
  • 15. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 further comprisingΔ1 between about 1.6 percent to 2.0 percent, and Δ2 less than −0.6.
  • 16. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 1 wherein Δ1 is between 1.6 and 2.0 percent and comprises an outer radius r1 between about 1.5 to 2.0 microns, Δ2 is less than about −0.6 percent, and comprises an outer radius r2 between about 4.5 and 6 microns, and Δ3 is between about 0.4 to 0.8 percent and comprises a center radius r3 between about 6 to 10 microns.
  • 17. The dispersion slope compensating optical fiber of claim 16 wherein r3 is spaced from r2 by greater than 1.0 microns.
  • 18. A dispersion compensating module comprising at least one fiber made in accordance with claim 1.
  • 19. A dispersion compensating optical fiber, comprising:a refractive index profile selected to result in a dispersion at 1550 nm which is less than −75 ps/nm/km; a dispersion slope which is less than −1.5 ps/nm 2/km over a wavelength range from 1525 to 1565 nm; a kappa value, obtained by dividing the dispersion at 1550 nm by a dispersion slope at 1550 nm, of between 40 and 60; and a central segment within the refractive index profile having a Δ1 and an outer radius r1, a second annular segment within the profile which surrounds the central segment having a Δ2 and an outer radius r2, a third annular segment in the profile which surrounds the second segment having a Δ3, and a cladding layer having a Δc, wherein Δ1>Δ3>Δc>Δ2.
  • 20. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 19 wherein a core moat ratio, defined as r1/r2, is less than 0.36.
  • 21. The dispersion slope compensating optical fiber of claim 20 wherein the core moat ratio is less than 0.34.
  • 22. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 19 wherein the dispersion at 1550 nm is less than −100 ps/nm/km.
  • 23. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 22 wherein dispersion slope is between about −1.5 and −3.0 ps/nm2/km over the wavelength range 1530 to 1560 nm.
  • 24. The dispersion slope compensating optical fiber of claim 19, whereinΔ1 is between 1.0 and 2.5 percent and comprises an outer radius r1 between about 1 to 3 microns; Δ2 is less than about −0.4 percent, and comprises an outer radius r2 between about 3.5 and 8 microns; and Δ3 is between about 0.2 to 1.0 percent and comprises a center radius r3 between about 5 to 12 microns.
  • 25. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 19, further comprising:□1 between about 1.6 and 2.0 percent, and □2 less than −0.6 percent.
  • 26. The dispersion compensating optical fiber of claim 19, further comprising:Δ1 is between 1.6 and 2.0 percent, and an outer radius r1 is between about 1.5 to 2.0 microns, Δ2 is less than about −0.6 percent, and an outer radius r2 is between about 4.5 and 6 microns, and Δ3 is between about 0.4 to 0.8 percent, and a center radius r3 is between about 6 to 10 microns.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Prov. applications No. 60/192,056 filed Mar. 24, 2000 and No. 60/196,437 filed Apr. 12, 2000, and is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/802,696 filed Mar. 9, 2001, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
4715679 Bhagavatula Dec 1987 A
5361319 Antos et al. Nov 1994 A
5448674 Vengsarkar et al. Sep 1995 A
5553185 Antos et al. Sep 1996 A
5555340 Onishi et al. Sep 1996 A
5568583 Akasaka et al. Oct 1996 A
5581647 Onishi et al. Dec 1996 A
5673354 Akasaka et al. Sep 1997 A
5740297 Onishi et al. Apr 1998 A
5838867 Inishi et al. Nov 1998 A
5999679 Antos et al. Dec 1999 A
6009221 Tsuda Dec 1999 A
6031955 Mukasa et al. Feb 2000 A
6349163 Antos et al. Feb 2002 B1
6421490 Liu Jul 2002 B1
6421491 Liu Jul 2002 B1
6453102 Dong et al. Sep 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
1 076 250 Feb 2001 FR
0 598 554 May 1999 GB
0 989 420 Mar 2000 GB
10-319266 Apr 1998 JP
WO 0017684 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0067053 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0070378 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0101177 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0173486 Oct 2001 WO
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60/192056 Mar 2000 US
60/196437 Apr 2000 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/802696 Mar 2001 US
Child 10/122250 US