The present invention relates generally to the field of display systems. More particularly, the application describes one or more reflective structures for use with a display's backlight system.
A light emitting diode (LED) array can be used in conjunction with a liquid crystal display (LCD) to display images. Depending on the voltage applied to the LCD pixel, variable amounts of the light generated by the LED may be transmitted through the LCD pixel. The light passing through the LCD forms an image observable by a viewer.
In many cases, the LCD requires input light to be within a certain angle of incidence. It also requires good uniformity in both angular and spatial distribution of the light at its input facet. The light that comes out of an LED array has a large angular distribution and will normally need be controlled on its way to the LCD in order to meet such demands. And such backlight control should not cause too much loss of light. A poorly designed control may result in a less-than-desirable spatial/angular uniformity (e.g., the spatial/angular distribution of the incidence of light rays along the LCD) and illumination efficiency (e.g., the output luminance on the LCD per the power provided by the LED array). One way to increase luminance is to increase the driving power of the LED array. However, this may result in the generation of excessive heat in the display system. Also, this does not result in an efficiency improvement because extra power is required to generate the extra luminance. Also, increasing the driving power does not necessarily improve the spatial uniformity and angular distribution.
Therefore, there is a need for a display's backlight system that results in improving illumination efficiency, spatial uniformity, and angular distribution.
It would be desirable to provide a system and/or method that provides one or more of these or other advantageous features. Other features and advantages will be made apparent from the present specification. The teachings disclosed extend to those embodiments that fall within the scope of the appended claims, regardless of whether they accomplish one or more of the aforementioned needs.
One embodiment of the invention relates to a display apparatus. The display apparatus includes a light source. The display apparatus includes a display target configured receive light from the light source. The display target displays an image using at least a portion of the light received from the light source. The display apparatus includes a first reflective structure configured to reduce an outgoing angle of at least a portion of the light from the light source. The display apparatus includes a second reflective structure configured to longitudinally translate at least a portion of the light from at least one of the light source and the first reflective structure toward the display target.
Another embodiment of the invention relates to a method for displaying an image. The method includes providing light rays from a light emitting diode (LED) array. The array may include an m×n matrix of LED lamps. The method includes providing a liquid crystal display (LCD) configured to transmit a majority of the light rays from the LED array. The portion of light rays transmitted is representative of an image displayed by the LCD. The method includes providing a plurality of first reflective surfaces disposed between the LED array and the LCD, and adjacent to the LED array. The plurality of first reflective surfaces reduces an outgoing angle of at least a portion of the light rays originating from the LED array. The method includes providing a plurality of second reflective surfaces disposed between the plurality of first reflective surfaces and the LCD. The plurality of second reflective surfaces longitudinally translates at least a portion of the light rays from at least one of the LED array and the plurality of first reflective surfaces toward the LCD.
Another embodiment of the invention relates to a display system. The display system includes multiple light emitting diode (LED) arrays. The LED arrays emit light rays. The LED arrays comprise an m×n matrix of LED lamps. The display system includes a liquid crystal display (LCD) configured to transmit a majority of the light rays from the LED arrays. The portion of light rays transmitted is representative of an image displayed by the LCD. The display system includes a plurality of first reflective surfaces disposed between the LED arrays and the LCD, and adjacent to the LED arrays. The plurality of first reflective surfaces reduce an outgoing angle of at least a portion of the light rays originating from the LED arrays. The display system includes a plurality of second reflective surfaces disposed between the plurality of first reflective surfaces and the LCD. The plurality of second reflective surfaces longitudinally translate at least a portion of the light rays from at least one of (a) the LED arrays and (b) the plurality of first reflective surfaces toward the LCD.
The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
A display apparatus may include a light source and a display target. In one or more embodiments of the present disclosure, a display apparatus having one or more reflective structures is provided. The reflective structures may be disposed between the light source (e.g., LED array) and the display target (e.g., LCD). According to an exemplary embodiment, a first reflective structure is advantageously used in combination with a second reflective structure. The reflective structures may reorient light rays originating from the light source. One or more reflective structures may advantageously modify (e.g., decrease) the outgoing angle of the light rays such that a greater proportion of the rays reach the display target and provide more desired spatial/angular uniformity. The use of one or more reflective structures may advantageously increase illumination efficiency of the display system. One or more reflective structures may advantageously translate the light rays across a longitudinal space between the light source and the display target. The illumination efficiency may be increased while advantageously not increasing the driving power of the light source and the heat generated by the light source. A reduction of light source driving power and heat may advantageously enable greater flexibility in construction of the display system through, e.g., the inclusion of electrical and/or mechanical components (e.g., wires, connectors, etc.) that are less tolerant of heat, a reduction in apparatus package size because a large heat sink is no longer needed to remove high heat, etc. One or more embodiments of the present disclosure may be advantageously utilized with a display target with a small pixel size. One or more embodiments may be advantageously utilized with a display target that is less suited to receiving light with relatively high incident angles.
Referring to
Display apparatus 106 (
The embodiment of
Space 102 is shown to exist between light source 106 and display target 126. The size of space 102 may vary in different embodiments. Light emitted by light source 106 traverses space 102 prior to reaching display target 126. According to an exemplary embodiment, space 102 includes first reflective structure 104 and second reflective structure 124. In other embodiments, one or more than two reflective structures may be disposed in space 102 between light source 106 and display target 126. First reflective structure 104 may have interior reflective surfaces 110. While only surface 110 is specifically referenced in
Reflective structures 104, 124 may include interior surfaces 110, 116, 118, 120, 122 that are made of, covered by, and/or otherwise include a material having the properties required for the material to reflect light and/or other electromagnetic radiation. For example, a film with reflective properties (e.g., mirror film) may be adhered to the interior surface of structures 104, 124. For example, a coating (e.g., aluminum) may be applied to the interior surface of structures 104, 124. In some embodiments, structures 104, 124 may be made of a same substance as the interior surface of the structures. For example, structures 104, 124 may be made of aluminum, and the interior surface may be aluminum. In some embodiments, the interior surfaces may be finished or otherwise processed in a manner that other surfaces of structures 104, 124 are not. For example, the interior surfaces of an aluminum structure may be polished. In some embodiments, structures 104, 124 may be made of a different substance than the interior reflective surface. For example, structures 104, 124 may be at least partially plastic, and the interior surface may have an aluminum coating applied to it. While aluminum is specifically mentioned in this discussion, other metals or any other substances with reflective properties may be utilized for structures 104, 124 and/or the interior surfaces of structures 104, 124. A material that maximizes reflectivity (e.g., as close to 100% reflectivity as possible) may be selected. For example, a mirror film with 98% reflectivity may be used. According to an exemplary embodiment, a material with greater than 50% reflectivity. According to another exemplary embodiment, a material at least 70% reflectivity is chosen. According to another exemplary embodiment, a material that balances uniformity when applied to the surface (e.g., how straight and/or regular is the surface after the material has been applied) and reflectivity is selected. In some embodiments, the material for interior surfaces 110, 116, 118, 120, 122 is chosen such that certain wavelengths of light are reflected, while others are not. While some interior surfaces are specifically discussed, other surfaces (e.g., non-interior surfaces) of first reflective structure 104, second reflective structure 124, and/or display apparatus 100 may have reflective properties.
One embodiment of first reflective structure 104 is shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment, first reflective structure 104 may be disposed adjacent to light source 106, in an intermediate position relative to light source 106 and display target 126 (
Referring to
The dimensions of various features of first reflective structure 104 may be chosen to maximize the illumination efficiency and/or optimize the spatial/angular uniformity of display apparatus 100. Structure 104 may have height 506. In some embodiments, height 506 may vary between 3 mm and 6 mm. Recess 402 may describe a space between perimeter 602 and perimeter 604. Perimeter 602 may have diameter 502, and perimeter 604 may have diameter 504. In some embodiments, the radius of perimeter 602 may be chosen such that an LED lamp may fit into recess 402 via perimeter 602. In some embodiments, the radius of perimeter 602 is approximately 1.5 mm. In some embodiments, the radius of perimeter 604 may vary between 3 mm and 3.5 mm. An interior surface 110 may be formed by the portion of structure 104 between perimeters 602, 604. Surface 110 may form angle 512. In some embodiments, angle 512 may vary between 28.1° and 61.9°. Angles 508, 510 may be described as half-angles (e.g., either angle 508 or angle 510 is half of cone angle 512). In some embodiments, angle 512 may be a particular value for one recess of structure 104 and a different value for another recess of structure 104. A larger cone angle 512 may result in a greater reduction of the outgoing angles of light from light source 106. Greater reduction of outgoing angles of light may advantageously increase the illumination efficiency. For example, when light with smaller angles is incident on the LCD, the photo scatter effect inside of the LCD may be reduced. This may result in increased LCD output contrast. For a display apparatus with a given internal size, larger cone angles may be accommodated by decreasing the height 506 of structure 104 and vice versa. With a relatively small height 506, some percentage rays with large angle from light source may miss structure 104. Thus, angle 512 and height 506 may be selected to balance the percentage of light that is reflected, so that overall light angles on LCD are controlled.
One embodiment of the second reflective structure 124 is shown in
In the embodiment of
In some embodiments, the longitudinal length and the cross-sectional area of second reflective structure 124 may be constrained (e.g., by the size and/or position of light source 106, display target 126, the space between light source 106 and display target 126, and/or display apparatus 100). In such embodiments, height 506, diameters 502, 504, and/or angle 512 of the first reflective structure 104 may be chosen to optimize the angular distribution and spatial uniformity of incident light on the LCD within the system constraints. In other embodiments, the longitudinal length and cross-sectional area of second reflective structure 124 may be chosen. In such embodiments, a larger longitudinal length and larger cross-sectional area may be selected such that there is sufficient space for a first reflective structure with larger height 506 and larger angle 512. This may advantageously result in greater angular and spatial uniformity of incident light along display target 126.
Light rays may originate from light source 106 at a particular outgoing angle. Light rays 206-214 with various outgoing angles are shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment, a straight cone or curved cone reflector array (e.g., first reflective structure 104) mounted on an LED array (e.g., light source 106) in combination with a mirror tunnel (e.g., second reflective structure 124), whose input side includes an LED array, can manage the light rays that illuminate an LCD (e.g., display target 126) such that, e.g., the light rays have desirable angles and angular uniformity that satisfy the illumination input requirements of the LCD. This may advantageously improve illumination efficiency. An increase in illumination efficiency may advantageously enable a reduction in the driving power for the LEDs and a reduction in the heat caused by driving the LEDs. Designs around the LEDs may also be improved because of reduced heat in the display system.
Referring to
Referring to
Curves 802-808 also demonstrate an advantageous reduction in the outgoing angle of light. Compared to curve 810, which shows at least a minimum relative luminance at measurement angles ±60°, curves 802-808 only register a minimum relative luminance around measurement angles ±55°. Moreover, whereas curve 810 shows a relatively flat relative luminance at all angles, curves 802-808 include peaks at smaller angles (i.e., more light has a smaller outgoing angle). The outgoing angles can be varied depending on the chosen cone design (e.g., angles 512, height 506, etc.) of first reflective structure 104; this is shown in the varying relative luminance values at varying measurement angles in curves 802-808. For example, curve 804 corresponds to structure 104 with the largest cone angles 512 of curves 802-808. Curve 804 shows a relatively large increase in relative luminance around measurement angles ±20°, whereas curves 802 and 806-808 experience large increases in relative luminance at larger measurement angles.
Display apparatus 100 (including first reflective structure 104 and/or second reflective structure 124) may be designed to optimize angular distribution and/or illumination efficiency. Angular distribution is a key factor for LCD performance. Angular distribution may be defined by the physical structure of the display apparatus. According to an exemplary embodiment, display apparatus 100 (including first reflective structure 104 and/or second reflective structure 124) may be advantageously designed for managing the outgoing angle distribution of light for certain types of LCDs, which are more sensitive to the angular distribution of incoming light.
Curves 802-808 show that balancing the parameters of first reflective structure 104 may advantageously result in optimizing angular distribution and increasing illumination efficiency. Different LCDs may have different angular distribution requirements on incoming illumination light. Cone angle 512, height 506, etc., of first reflective structure 104 can be designed to obtain the desired angular distribution. Curve 808 is associated with structure 104 with a relatively large angle 512 (53.1°) and relatively small height 506 (3.5 mm). Based on this relatively large angle, one would expect a relatively large increase in illumination efficiency. This is generally true, especially compared to curve 810. However, curve 802, which has structure 104 with a smaller angle 512 (43.6°) is shown to have greater relative luminance (at least for small measurement angles). This is because structure 104 associated with curve 802 has a relatively large height 506 (5 mm). In various embodiments, the parameters associated with first reflective structure 104 and/or second reflective structure 124 may be chosen to manage light rays to desired angles (e.g., outgoing angles and/or angles of incidence at display target 126) and angular distribution at display target 126.
Referring to
The systems and/or methods described herein may be advantageously implemented with many types of display systems (e.g., helmet-mounted displays, televisions, monitors, etc.). For example, multiple display apparatuses 100 may be combined to form a component of a helmet (e.g., a helmet used by an aircraft pilot), television, monitor, etc.
The construction and arrangement of the systems and methods as shown in the various exemplary embodiments are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.). For example, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present disclosure. The order or sequence of any process or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure.
Although the figures may show a specific order of method steps, the order of the steps may differ from what is depicted. Also, two or more steps may be performed concurrently or with partial concurrence. Such variation will depend on the software and hardware systems chosen and on designer choice. All such variations are within the scope of the disclosure. Likewise, software implementations could be accomplished with standard programming techniques with rule based logic and other logic to accomplish the various connection steps, processing steps, comparison steps, and decision steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20020097354 | Greiner | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20040080938 | Holman et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050276069 | Taniguchi et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007553 | Bogner | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060091784 | Conner et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060092643 | Wong | May 2006 | A1 |
20060203146 | Bang | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060215075 | Huang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070147075 | Bang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152230 | Duong | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070223248 | Han | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080002100 | Kaneko et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080002403 | Kim | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080186273 | Krijn et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080291668 | Aylward et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090118406 | Tomoda | May 2009 | A1 |
20090268434 | Mita | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100027241 | Nakanishi | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100027257 | Boonekamp et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100061087 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079980 | Sakai | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100165472 | Hamasaki | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100165621 | Hoffend et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100290247 | Im | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110037740 | Yamaguchi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120092854 | Fang | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120140446 | Seetzen | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120212689 | Chang | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224111 | Ohshima | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130100648 | Nozawa | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130128128 | Ikuta | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148036 | Shimizu | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130301241 | Maeda | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2012029600 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2012102163 | Aug 2012 | WO |