The present invention relates to a display controller system and a method of transferring data from the main memory of a CPU to a display device, in particular, an electrophoretic display.
An electrophoretic display (EPD) is a non-emissive device based on the electrophoresis phenomenon of charged pigment particles suspended in a solvent. The display usually comprises two plates with electrodes placed opposing each other, separated by using spacers. One of the electrodes is usually transparent. A suspension composed of a colored solvent and charged pigment particles is enclosed between the two plates. When a voltage difference is imposed between the two electrodes, the pigment particles migrate to one side and then either the color of the pigment or the color of the solvent can be seen according to the polarity of the voltage difference.
In order to obtain a desired image, driving waveforms are required for an electrophoretic display. A driving waveform consists of a series of voltages applied to a pixel to allow migration of the pigment particles in the electrophoretic fluid. For an image of 600×800 pixels, there is a tremendous amount of image data and waveforms that need to be processed in a given time period. While the images are being constantly updated, in the method currently used, the central processing unit of a computer must wait until an image update is completed before the display controller can receive additional image data. This method has the disadvantage of delaying processing the image data, thus causing slow-down of the entire system.
The first aspect of the present invention is directed to a display controller system for transferring image data to a display wherein the display controller comprises a memory controller, a first buffer and a second buffer, and the memory controller transfers data from one of the buffers which is full, to an image memory.
In one embodiment, the memory controller determines if image data from a CPU memory is transferred to the first buffer or the second buffer. In one embodiment, the two buffers operate as ping-pong buffers. In one embodiment, the display controller further comprises a display controller CPU and a look-up table. In one embodiment, the image memory has at least three spaces.
The second aspect of the present invention is directed to a method of transferring data for a display device, which method comprises:
In one embodiment, during multiple line updating time periods, Steps A and B repeat and are carried out in an interleaving manner. In one embodiment, in a line updating time period, Step B is skipped. In one embodiment, the display is an electrophoretic display. In one embodiment, the line updating time period is calculated from a frame time divided by the number of lines of pixels.
The third aspect of the present invention is directed to a display system comprising:
The display controller system and method of the present invention enables transferring data from the main memory of the CPU to the image memory without interfering the image updating. As a result, the present invention may allow continuously updating the display image and continuously writing new image data from CPU to the image memory, which improves overall system performance.
An electrophoretic fluid 13 comprising charged pigment particles 15 dispersed in a solvent is filled in each of the display cells. The movement of the charged particles in a display cell is determined by the voltage potential difference applied to the common electrode and the pixel electrode associated with the display cell in which the charged particles are filled. For example, in a binary system where positively charged white particles are dispersed in a black solvent, when no voltage is applied to a common electrode and a voltage of +15V is applied to a pixel electrode, the driving voltage for the charged pigment particles in the area of the pixel would be +15V. In this case, the driving voltage would move the white particles to be near or at the common electrode and as a result, the white color is seen through the common electrode (i.e., the viewing side). Alternatively, when no voltage is applied to a common electrode and a voltage of −15V is applied to a pixel electrode, the driving voltage in this case would be −15V and under such −15V driving voltage, the positively charged white particles would move to be at or near the pixel electrode, causing the color of the solvent (black) to be seen at the viewing side.
If there is only one type of pigment particles in the electrophoretic fluid, the pigment particles may be positively charged or negatively charged. In another embodiment, the electrophoretic display fluid may have a transparent or lightly colored solvent or solvent mixture and charged particles of two different colors carrying opposite particle charges, and/or having differing electro-kinetic properties.
The display cells may be of a conventional walled or partition type, a microencapsulated type or a microcup type. In the microcup type, the electrophoretic display cells may be sealed with a top sealing layer. There may also be an adhesive layer between the electrophoretic display cells and the common electrode.
The term “display cell” is intended to refer to a micro-container which is individually filled with a display fluid. Examples of “display cell” include, but are not limited to, microcups, microcapsules, micro-channels, other partition-typed display cells and equivalents thereof.
In a practical implementation of EPD, the desired images may be black, white, and a number of grey levels (e.g. 2, 4, 16, or 256 grey levels). The black and white colors may be, in general, referred to as first and second color states. The grey levels may be, in general, referred to as intermediate color states.
The amount of data required to define an image is the number of lines in the image times the number of pixel per line times the number of bits required to defined the color. One example is a display with 600 lines×800 pixels per line times 8 bits. The 8 bits defines 256 gray levels. However, the present invention may apply to a display with different combinations of desired pixel images.
An active matrix driving mechanism is often used to drive a display device. In general, an active matrix display device includes a display unit on which the pixels are arranged in a matrix form. A diagram of the structure of a pixel is illustrated in
More specifically, a thin film transistor (TFT) array is composed of a matrix of pixels and ITO region 251 (a transparent electric conducting film) each with a TFT device 254 and is called an array. A significant number of these pixels together create an image on the display. For example, an EPD may have an array of 600 lines by 800 pixels/line, thus 480,000 pixels/TFT units.
A TFT device 254 is a switching device, which functions to turn each individual pixel on or off, thus controlling the number of electrons flow into the ITO zone 251 through a capacitor 255. As the number of electrons reaches the expected value, TFT turns off and these electrons can be kept within the ITO zone.
In practice, charged particles corresponding to a pixel are driven to a desired location by a series of driving voltages which is often referred to as a driving waveform.
Typically, a driving waveform period is 100 msec to 10 seconds, depending upon the quality of a display device, age of the display device, and environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, humidity or lighting conditions).
There are frames within the driving waveform 450 as shown in
When driving an EPD on an active matrix backplane, it usually takes many frames for the image to be displayed. The term “frame period” or “frame time” is intended to refer to the interval time during which a voltage is applied to a pixel in order to update an image. For example, during the frame period 451, a voltage of +V is applied to the pixel.
The typical frame time ranges from 2 msec to 100 msec. Therefore, there may be as many as 1000 frames in a waveform period, but typically there are 20-40 frames in a waveform period. A typical frame period is 20 msec (millisecond) and therefore for a driving waveform having a length of 2000 msec, the voltages are applied 100 times to each single pixel.
An image update is carried out line by line. In an example, an EPD may comprise an active matrix of 600 lines of 800 pixels per line. During each frame time, all of the pixels in the image are updated. Hence, there are 600 line updating time periods in a frame period and during each line updating time period, there are 800 pixels to be updated. Therefore the term “line updating time period” is intended to refer to the frame time divided by the number of lines in a display device. If the frame period is 20 msec, then the line updating time period for an image of 600 lines×800 pixels per line would be equal to 20/600=33 μsec (microsecond).
As stated, an EPD requires a series of applied voltages to drive the pigment particles to a desired state. As described, the display controller transmits voltage information, frame by frame, to the TFT backplane of the display, e.g., the source driver IC and the gate driver IC. The gate driver IC selects which line to charge, and the source driver IC provides the appropriate voltage level.
The CPU 505 is able to read to or write to CPU memory 504 via computer bus 506. CPU memory 504 is sometimes referred to as the “main memory” in the system.
In a display application, the images are stored in the CPU memory 504. When an image is to be displayed, the CPU 505 sends a request to the display controller 502. CPU 505 then instructs the CPU memory 504 to transfer the image data via computer bus 506 to the display controller 502.
In the current display controller system as shown in
When an image update is being carried out, the display controller CPU 512 accesses the current image and the next image from the image memory 503 and compares the two images. Based on the comparison, the display controller CPU 512 consults the lookup table 510 to find the appropriate waveform for each pixel. More specifically, when driving from the current image to the next image, a proper driving waveform is selected from the look up table for each pixel, depending on the color states of the two consecutive images of that pixel. For example, a pixel may be in the white state in the current image and in the level 5 grey state in the next image, a waveform is chosen accordingly.
The selected driving waveforms are sent to the display 501 to be applied to the pixels to drive the current image to the next image. The driving waveforms however are sent, frame by frame, to the display.
In this system, while the display controller 512 is busy constantly updating the images, it cannot receive additional new image data from the CPU memory 504 because the memory cannot be read or written to at the same time. The CPU memory 504 has to wait until the display controller 512 finishes updating before the additional new image data may be transmitted. This causes significant slow-down of the entire system.
In the present invention, a memory controller 611 and two buffers 608 and 609 are incorporated to solve the delay issue.
As shown in
According to the present invention, the new image data may be transmitted to the buffers 608 or 609 as determined by the memory controller 611. Buffer0608 and buffer1609 are “ping-gong” or “double” buffers and are implemented to receive image data from the CPU memory 604. The size of the buffer is significantly smaller than the size of data for a single image. For example, it may be about 0.001% to about 10% of the size of the data of a single image.
In practice, while Buffer0608 is read, buffer1609 can be written to, and while buffer1609 is read, Buffer0608 can be written to. Hence, if buffer0608 is full, then buffer1609 may be available to receive image data from the CPU memory 604. With the ping-pong buffers, data in one buffer may be processed while the next set of image data is read into the other buffer.
Once one of the buffers is full, the data in that buffer is available to be processed and transferred to image memory 603. The transferring of the data from the buffer 608 or 609 to the image memory 603 occurs during an idle time which is after the voltages for a line of pixels have been sent to the display and before the waveforms of the next line of pixels are processed.
For the purpose of this invention, the image memory 603 has at least three spaces, e.g., A, B and C. Image memory Spaces A and B are occupied by the images that are being updated. The new image data are then transmitted to image memory Space C. There may be more than three spaces in the image memory.
In summary, the present invention allows the following two steps (A and B) to be sequentially carried out within a “line updating time period”.
Step A:
Step B:
The current and next images may be referred to as the first and second images.
In Step A(iii), the display controller CPU 612 provides the voltage data to the source driver IC and the gate driver IC of the display 601.
If neither of the buffers is full, Step B may be skipped.
As described previously, the term “line updating time period” in the present invention is defined as the frame period divided by the number of lines in an image. For example, for an image of 600 lines×800 pixels per line and the frame period is 20 msec, the line updating time would be 33 μsec.
The frame time is an inherent feature of an active matrix TFT driving system and it is usually set at 20 msec.
As shown in
With the aforementioned approach, CPU 605 may send the data to the buffer0608 or buffer1609 at any time and the image data in the buffers may move to the image memory 603 at a regular interval.
As stated above, the data in a buffer is transferred to the image memory only when the buffer is full. In
The method as shown in
It is understood that it is also possible to transfer data from a buffer to the image memory when it is not full. However, in practice, it is less preferred.
In order to avoid both buffers being full at the same time, the writing speed from CPU 605 to the buffers must be calculated and controlled.
Although the foregoing disclosure has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent to a person having ordinary skill in that art that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims. It should be noted that there are many alternative ways of implementing both the method and system of the present invention. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as exemplary and not restrictive, and the inventive features are not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. non-Provisional application Ser. No. 13/828,370, filed Mar. 14, 2013 (Publication No. 2013/0222404), which is itself a continuation-in-part of U.S. non-Provisional application Ser. No. 12/882,094, filed Sep. 14, 2010 (Publication No. 2011/0063314, now abandoned) which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/242,680, filed Sep. 15, 2009; the contents of all the preceding applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5652605 | Nishioka | Jul 1997 | A |
5930026 | Jacobson | Jul 1999 | A |
6208772 | Wilt | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6271866 | Hancock | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6445489 | Jacobson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504524 | Gates | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512354 | Jacobson | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6531997 | Gates | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6744919 | Said | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753999 | Zehner | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6825970 | Goenaga | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6859302 | Liang | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900851 | Morrison | May 2005 | B2 |
6930818 | Liang | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6995550 | Jacobson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7012600 | Zehner | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023420 | Comiskey et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7034783 | Gates | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7061166 | Kuniyasu | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061662 | Chung | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7116466 | Whitesides et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119772 | Amundson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7177066 | Chung | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7193625 | Danner et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202847 | Gates | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7242514 | Chung | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7259744 | Arango | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304787 | Whitesides et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7312794 | Zehner | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327511 | Whitesides et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7408699 | Wang | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7453445 | Amundson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7492339 | Amundson | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7528822 | Amundson | May 2009 | B2 |
7545358 | Gates et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7583251 | Arango | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7602374 | Zehner et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7612760 | Kawai | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7679599 | Kawai | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7679813 | Liang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683606 | Kang | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7688297 | Zehner et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7729039 | LeCain et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733311 | Amundson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733335 | Zehner et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737984 | Hancock | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768678 | Nacman | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787169 | Abramson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7859742 | Chiu | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7952557 | Amundson | May 2011 | B2 |
7956841 | Albert | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982479 | Wang | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7999787 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8077141 | Duthaler | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8125501 | Amundson | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8139050 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8174490 | Whitesides | May 2012 | B2 |
8243013 | Sprague | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8274472 | Wang | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8289250 | Zehner | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8300006 | Zhou | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8305341 | Arango | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8314784 | Ohkami | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8373649 | Low | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384658 | Albert | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8456414 | Lin | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8462102 | Wong | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8514168 | Chung | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8537105 | Chiu | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8558783 | Wilcox | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8558785 | Zehner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8558786 | Lin | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8558855 | Sprague | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8576164 | Sprague | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8576259 | Lin | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593396 | Amundson | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8605032 | Liu | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8643595 | Chung | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8665206 | Lin | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681191 | Yang | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8730153 | Sprague | May 2014 | B2 |
8810525 | Sprague | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8928562 | Gates et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8928641 | Chiu | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8976444 | Zhang | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9013394 | Lin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9019197 | Lin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9019198 | Lin | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9019318 | Sprague | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9082352 | Cheng | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9171508 | Sprague | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9218773 | Sun | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224338 | Chan | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224342 | Lin | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224344 | Chung | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9230492 | Harrington | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251736 | Lin | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9262973 | Wu | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9269311 | Amundson | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9299294 | Lin | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9373289 | Sprague | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9390066 | Smith | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9412314 | Amundson | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20030102858 | Jacobson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040246562 | Chung | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050195203 | Sadanand | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050253777 | Zehner et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060061577 | Subramaniam | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060291032 | Zhou | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070080971 | Sung | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091418 | Danner et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070103427 | Zhou | May 2007 | A1 |
20070176912 | Beames | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263234 | Nacman | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080024429 | Zehner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024482 | Gates | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080062201 | Bhatia | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080136774 | Harris | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080239393 | Navon | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291129 | Harris | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303780 | Sprague | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090174651 | Jacobson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195568 | Sjodin | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090256868 | Low | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090322721 | Zehner | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100194733 | Lin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100194789 | Lin | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100220121 | Zehner | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265260 | Swic | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100265561 | Gates et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100283804 | Sprague | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110007056 | Huitema | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110063314 | Chiu | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110175875 | Lin | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110193840 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110193841 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110199671 | Amundson | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110221740 | Yang | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130222404 | Chiu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130272528 | Bushen | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Kao, W.C., Ye, J.A. and Lin, C. (Jan. 2009) Image Quality Improvement for Electrophoretic Displays by Combining Contrast Enhancement and Halftoning Techniques. ICCE 2009 Digest of Technical Papers, 11.2-2. Jan. 14, 2009. |
Kao, W.C., Ye, J.A., Chu, Mi and Su, C.Y. (Feb. 2009) Image Quality Improvement for Electrophoretic Displays by Combining Contrast Enhancement and Halftoning Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2009, vol. 55, Issue 1, pp. 15-19. Feb. 1, 2009. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160267849 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61242680 | Sep 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13828370 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15164934 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12882094 | Sep 2010 | US |
Child | 13828370 | US |