The application relates to a display device including a display to generate a real image and an optical system and, more particularly, to an improved optical system with a plurality of lenslets each producing a ray pencil from each object pixel of a cluster.
Head mounted display (HMD) technology is a rapidly developing area. An ideal head mounted display combines a high resolution, a large field of view, a low and well-distributed weight, and a structure with small dimensions.
The embodiments disclosed herein refer to lenslet array based optics. This type of optics have been used in HMD technologies in the frame of Light Field Displays (LFD) to provide a solution to the vergence-accommodation conflict (VAC) appearing in most present HMDs. As yet LFD may solve this conflict at the expense of having a low resolution. State of the art of a LFD of this type was described by Douglas Lanman, David Luebke, “Near-Eye Light Field Displays” ACM SIGGRAPH 2013 Emerging Technologies, July 2013, “Lanman 2013”.
Designing a optic for virtual reality that is compact, produces a wide field of view and a high resolution virtual image is a challenging task. Refractive single channel optics are commonly used, but the difficulty in designing them arises from the fact that they must handle a significant etendue. In order to control all this light one needs a large number of degrees of freedom which typically means using many optical surfaces, making the resulting optic complex and bulky. One possible alternative is to use folding optics, such as the pancake design. However, these tend to have very low efficiencies, which is a significant drawback in devices meant to light and to run on batteries.
An alternative to these technologies is to use multiple channel optics. Now, each channel handles a much smaller etendue and is therefore easier to design, resulting in simpler, smaller and more efficient optical configurations. Multiple channel configurations, however, tend to have duplicated information on the display, which lowers the resolution that may be achieved.
This invention describes several strategies to overcome the limitations to multi-channel configurations, increasing resolution while reducing the size of the optics and increasing energy efficiency. Traditional multi-channel configurations (such a lens arrays combined with a display) create an eye box within which the eye may move and still be presented with a visible virtual image. These, however, are low focal, low resolution configurations. One option to increase resolution is to increase the focal length of the lenses in the array. This reduces the eye box size and leads to the need to use eye pupil tracking. Increasing the focal length also increases the thickness of the device (due to the longer focal length). This strategy increases resolution at the cost of eye tracking and an increased device thickness. These configurations maintain duplicate information in the display, where the same information is shown through different channels in order to compose the virtual image.
One step further eliminates the duplicate information in the display. As is disclosed in PCT11 this strategy permits an increased focal length, which in turn results in an increased resolution. However, a longer focal length also leads to a larger device which may be undesirable. In an alternative configuration, the lenses in the array are split into families and the focal length reduced, reducing device size. Each family now generates a lower resolution virtual image, but said virtual images generated by the different families are interlaced to recover a high resolution. These configurations combine the compactness of short focal devices with high image resolution. However, these configurations don't make a full use of the panel because some panel pixels (also called object pixels) need to be turned off to avoid crosstalk between channels and consequently cannot be used to send images to the eye. This crosstalk occurs because each channel is designed to create on the eye retina a partial virtual image from the light coming from a particular set of object pixels (called cluster), and so, the light coming from pixels not belonging to its cluster and processed by the channel may create unwanted overlapped images. This is particularly dangerous for the pixels that are physically close to the cluster. Light from pixels far from the cluster may illuminate the channel, but the channel redirects it far from the eye pupil so that light does not get into the eye and does not creates crosstalk, in general.
A step further to make full use of the panel is disclosed herein. This step consist of confining the emission of the panel pixels so the light emanating from them does not illuminate channels close to the right one. This eliminates the need of turning off some object pixels, allowing for a full use of the panel. This strategy not only improves the effective use of all panel pixels but also reduces the power consumed by reducing the light emitted outside the eye pupil. Additionally, as disclosed herein, this strategy allows also color images without the use of absorbing filters, improving energy efficiency and cost a bit further. Optionally, color sequential can be used (which leads to improvements in virtual image resolution) if the panel switching speed.
A display device is disclosed comprising a panel, operable to generate a real image comprising a plurality of object pixels; and an optical system, comprising a plurality of lenslets; the panel and the optical system both arranged in a plurality of channels, each channel comprising a lenslet and a cluster of object pixels;
Preferably the average illuminance produced by at least one cluster on the output pupil of the lenslet associated to this cluster is at least 10 times greater than the average illuminance generated by this cluster on the output pupil of a set of lenslets surrounding the lenslet associated to that cluster.
Preferably said set of lenslets include the lenslets adjacent to the lenslet associated to the cluster.
Optionally at least two of the lenslets cannot be made to coincide by a simple translation rigid motion.
Adjacent lenslets preferably project light of different primary colors, the different colors may be produced by color filters.
At least one lenslet may have a pancake optical configuration.
Waists of the pencils of adjacent lenslets are may be at a waist surface.
Foveal rays may be a subset of rays emanating from the lenslets during use that reach the eye and whose straight prolongation is away from the imaginary sphere center a distance smaller than a value between 2 and 4 mm; and the image quality of the virtual image formed by the foveal rays is greater than the image quality of the virtual image formed by non-foveal rays emanating from the lenslets during use.
Each lenslet may produce a ray pencil from each object pixel of its corresponding cluster, said pencils having corresponding waists laying close to a waist surface.
Preferably the ray pencils are activated to make the accommodation pixels lay close to a waist surface.
A backlight may be included to illuminate the panel.
A backlight may be included to illuminate the panel, wherein the backlight comprises a plurality of microlenslets and light emitters.
A set of o-pixels may be turned off along the cluster's peripheries.
The panel may be transmissive and further comprises a backlight to illuminate the panel, wherein the backlight comprises a plurality of microlenslets and light emitters; the state of a light emitter may change between active and inactive in time intervals;
The images of a light emitter through two adjacent microlenslets may be formed on the output pupil of two non-adjacent lenslets whose centers are separated by a distance at least twice the minimum diameter of the output pupil of the lenslets.
Adjacent light emitters may produce different primary colors.
Optionally, the light emitters are light emitting diodes.
Preferably some active light emitters are dimmed according to the brightness of the image to be displayed on the microcluster associated to the emitter.
At least one microcluster may contain an object pixel with a transmission greater than 90% of its maximum transmission.
The light emitters many be pixels of a second transmissive panel back illuminated by a lightguide. The lightguide may be fed sequentially by different primary colors.
Each light emitter may comprise a collimator.
The lenslets may be configured in a locally-squared array.
The lenslets may be configured in a locally-hexagonal array.
The fraction of active emitters may be less than 50%.
The number of microlenslets belonging to a channel may be greater than 20.
The optical system may further comprise at least a conforming lens along the ray path from the panel to the eye. The conforming lens may be a pancake optical configuration.
There nay be more green color ray pencils than blue color ray pencils.
The intersection of each ray pencil with the eye pupil plane may fully lays inside the eye pupil.
The intersection of each ray pencil with the eye pupil plane may fully lay inside a static eye pupil position.
The display device may further comprise a driver operative to drive and assign the object pixels to the channel clusters.
The display device may further comprise a pupil tracker and a driver operative to dynamically drive and assign the object pixels to the channel clusters.
The display device in any of the embodiments may further comprise a pupil tracker and a driver operative to dynamically drive and assign the object pixels and light emitters to the channel clusters.
The conforming lens may have at least one surface with slope discontinuities.
The display device may include two or more panels per eye.
The display device may further comprise a second display device, a mount to position the first and second display devices relative to one another such that their respective lenslets project the light towards two eyes of a human being, and a driver operative to cause the display devices to display objects such that the two virtual images from the two display devices combine to form a single image when viewed by a human observer.
In an embodiment, the object pixels close to a border of the cluster are dark.
The display driver may drive more power to the object pixels whose corresponding pencils enter partially the eye pupil to compensate for flux lost by vignetting.
The display device may further comprise a mask to block the undesired light from the lenslet exit apertures.
The foregoing and other features of the invention and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, as illustrated in the accompanying figures. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and the description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
The above and other aspects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following more particular description thereof, presented in conjunction with the following drawings wherein:
A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of the invention and accompanying drawings, which set forth illustrative embodiments in which the principles of the invention are utilized.
The embodiments in the present invention consist on an display device comprising one or more displays per eye, operable to generate a real image comprising a plurality of object pixels (or opixels for short); and an optical system, comprising a plurality of lenslets, each one having associated at a given instant a cluster of object pixels. Each lenslet produces a ray pencil from an object pixel of its corresponding cluster. We shall call ray pencil (or just pencil) to the set of straight lines that contain segments coincident with ray trajectories illuminating the eye, such that these rays carry the same information at any instant. The same information means the same (or similar) luminance, color and any other variable that modulates the light and can be detected by the human eye. In general, the color of the rays of the pencil is constant with time while the luminance changes with time. This luminance and color are a property of the pencil. The pencil must intersect the pupil range to be viewable at some of the allowable positions of the pupil. When the light of a pencil is the only one entering the eye's pupil, the eye accommodates at a point near the location of the pencil's waist if it is being gazed and if the waist is far enough from the eye. The rays of a pencil are represented, in general, by a simply connected region of the phase space. The set of straight lines forming the pencil usually has a small angular dispersion and a small spatial dispersion at its waist. A straight line determined by a point of the central region of the pencil's phase space representation at the waist is usually chosen as representative of the pencil. This straight line is called central ray of the pencil. The waist of a pencil may be substantially smaller than 1 mm2 and its maximum angular divergence may be below ±10 mrad, a combination which may be close to the diffraction limit. The pencils intercept the eye sphere inside the pupil range in a well-designed system. The light of a single o-pixel lights up several pencils of different lenslets, in general, but only one or none of these pencils may reach the eye's retina, otherwise there is undesirable cross-talk between lenslets. The o-pixel to lenslet cluster assignation may be dynamic because it may depend on the eye pupil position.
The waist of a pencil is the minimum RMS region of a plane intersecting all the rays of the pencil. This flat region is in general normal to the pencil's central ray. In some embodiments the waists of some or all of the pencils can be grouped by its proximity to certain surfaces. These surfaces are called waist surfaces. Sometimes planes can approximate these surfaces. These planes are preferably normal to the frontward direction.
Different lenslets and their clusters have a similar behavior. As another example, light emitted from the points of cluster 210 cross the corresponding lens 209 and segment 211. Light crossing all lenslets or array 214 will enter the eye pupil 212 making it visible to the eye 213.
In this configuration, if emitter 507 is on, microlenslet 505 will emit light towards lenslet 508 through LCD panel 501. However, if emitter 509 is off, lenslet 505 will not emit light towards lenslet 510 through LCD panel 501 and no crosstalk is generated. Accordingly, if emitter 511 is off, microlenslet 505 will not emit light towards lenslet 512 through LCD panel 501 and no crosstalk is generated.
Using this embodiment, it is then possible to turn on a given emitter in panel 502 such that a given microlenslet in panel 503 will illuminate a given lenslet in array 506. However, by turning off the emitters next to said emitter in panel 502, said microlenslet will not emit light to the neighbors of said lenslet, avoiding crosstalk.
A given lenslet 508 is associated with a cluster 513 because both belong to the same channel. One may then select the microlenslets under said cluster and turn on only the emitters such that said microlenslets illuminate lenslet 508.
Also shown are light emitters 1104 coupled to nonimaging collimators 1105. Said nonimaging collimators widen the apparent size of said light emitters as seen from the microlens array 1106. Example of such collimators may be Compound Parabolic Concentrators (CPCs) or aspheric lenses.
Without loss of generality consider next the case in which the interlacing factor k=2 will have 4 families of lenslets interlaced and with a square subpixel panel configuration. (which could be Red, Green, Blue and White if the white light emitter is more efficient than the Green, or alternatively Red, Green, Blue and Yellow is a wider color gamut is desired). Any skill in the art can be extrapolate this description to other interlacing factors, as k=21/2, 31/2, 71/2, 3, etc. As described in PCT11, a squarish lenslet array configuration is the suitable one for this interlacing k=2 factor, so four families on lenslets, each one producing the full virtual image, but their pixels being projected to the eye interlaced. “Squarish” or stands for a general case in which the lenslets distribution is not perfectly allocated in a square grid, but is locally squared, either because the channel designs are done to produce variable cluster sizes, or because one or more conforming lenses are used in the system.
Consider the canonical simplification to illustrate the invention in which a square array of lenslets is used, whose pitch is d, located at a distance to the eye pupil ER (which stands for eye relief) and that when the eye rotates the pupil approximately shifts laterally, perpendicular to the z axis. To avoid the resolution of the virtual image be limited by diffraction, the size of the lenslet output pupils should be larger than, let say, 0.75 mm, so the lenslets pitch d, will not be smaller that that value. A minimum design value should be around d=0.8 mm, since for λ=589.3 nm, the Rayleigh criterion states that the resolvable pixel will be 0.61λ/d=0.045 mrad=0.0257 deg, that is, 1/0.0257≈40 ppd.
An underfilling strategy with k=2 requires that each minilens produces a virtual image with size in its diagonal cross section given by:
where αn+1 and αn are the extreme diagonal fields of channel n, and are the conjugates of the diagonal corners of the clusters. Assuming the waist plane is for simplicity of this explanation is located at infinity and a tangent law mapping in this example, we get that:
where F is the lenslets focal length and c is the cluster side. The clusters associated to each lenslet are preferably assigned so their size is proportional to the solid angle subtended by their output pupil from the center of the eye pupil. In this canonical example, with the clusters are squares with side:
Combining Equations 1, 2 and 3, we can solve for F and c to find:
F=ER [Equation 4]
c=2d=1.6 mm [Equation 5]
Notice this focal length is very long compared to the underfilling strategy disclosed in PCI 11, in which the illumination is not confined in the channels, since the equivalent canonical example in that case gets:
If the comparison between both systems is done with the same eye relief ER and the same circular FOV=90 deg, the present invention requires the use of a larger display due to the larger focal length of the lenslets. As an example, for ER=15 mm, the present invention (in this canonical example) has F=15 mm and requires a 3.34 inch diagonal panel, while PCT1.1 invention has F=5.72 mm and uses a 2.31 inch diagonal panel. If both panel have the same total pixel count of 4.5 k×4.5 k, the former opixel pitch will be 13.33 microns, while the latter has 9.21 microns. Since the resolution at the virtual image is given by:
where op is the panel opixel pitch, the present invention (in this canonical example) will provide a resolution of 39.3 ppd (matching the diffraction limit above), while PCT11 invention obtains only 21.7 ppd, that is, nearly a half.
If the comparison is done, instead of with the same ER, with the same panel with 3.34 inch diagonal and the same circular FOV=90 deg FOV, then the PCT11 invention with have an ER=21.7 mm, F=8.28 mm, but will provide a very similar resolution (22.3 ppd).
The union of all ray pencil prints UPP of the channels at the pupil plane is equal for all channels and is the same for the canonical example of this invention and the equivalent canonical examples of the PCT11 invention. It is given by a square of diagonal centered on the eye pupil:
UPP diagonal<3d√{square root over (2)} [Equation 8]
Therefore, for no vignetting to be produced by the eye pupil, the minimum size D of the user eye pupil should be bigger than that UPP. For d=0.8 mm, D≥3.4 mm (for smaller pupil, some vignetting occurs, that can be corrected by software).
Regarding the backlight design, it is formed by microlenslets imaging the plane where an array of light emitters is placed on the output pupil of the lenslets. This type of illumination is known as Köhler integration. Each light emitters position is configured together with the microlenslets and lenslets positions, so the following conditions are fulfilled:
At a given instant, a microlenslet is associated to a single channel and a single light emitter is associated to that microlenslet, and it will be addressed to illuminate its associated channel lenslet through the microlenslet (eventually this addressing may be such that no flux is produced if local dimming is being used). Due to Condition 2, the adjacent lenslets will not be illuminated by this microlenslet, typically two or more coronas of lenslets around the associated one. At another instant, the microlens may become associated to a different channel, and according to Condition 1, this can be done by activating a different light emitter to be associated to said microlenslet to illuminate the lenslet associated to that different channel.
In a preferred embodiment, the light emitters are all white and the panel is LCD type with color filters on each opixel. Such white emitters may be generated by a second, lower resolution LCD without color filters whose pixels become the emitters when they allow polarized light to cross through. This light is preferably generated by several R, G, and B LEDs that feed a lightguide whose purpose is to spread evenly the light through the LCD as in a conventional LCD display.
In a different embodiment the color filter may be allocated on the minilenses instead of being on the panel o-pixels. Then, all the pencils of each channel will have the same color. This means that the different families of minilenses will generate the whole image, but of different colors, and their superposion generates the final image.
In another preferred embodiment, the light emitters themselves emit a primary color, and again each family of channels of the interlacing is associated to one color. In this embodiment no color filters are used, resulting in a higher efficiency configuration. In the previous canonical example, a k=2 design in square configuration will have 4 families of lenslets interlaced, and each one can be associated to one of the four colors R, G, B, W. If this embodiment, one lenslet belongs to a given family, it will have a fixed colour too, and in this case a lenslet family can be named by its color. Assume the previous canonical example in a square grid where square clusters contain N×N microlenslets. The light emitters array will be in a four color square grid analogous to the one of the lenslets, so along a line there will be light emitters of two colors, for instance . . . RGRGRG . . . while along a contiguous line will be the other two colors . . . BWBWBW . . . . If a microlenslet belong, for instants, a red channel, its corresponding active light emitter will be red, and so will the active light emitter of an adjacent microlenslet of the same cluster be.
Let M−1 be the number of light emitters which are inactive between those two. According to Condition 2, M is preferable greater than 3. Therefore, if we denote with lower case the inactive light emitters and upper case the active ones, we could have M=4 which will mean that, for instance in red cluster we would have . . . RgrgRgrgR . . . and . . . bwbwbw . . . . In the adjacent green cluster the active pixels will be . . . rGrgrGrgr . . . and . . . bwbwbw . . . . In the transition between these red and green clusters we will preferably have . . . RgrgRgrGrgrG . . . M could also be another greater even number (for instance, 6), but the larger M the smaller size of light emitters is needed.
Following
Using that F=ER (Eq. 4), we can solve Eq. 9 to get:
For d=0.8 mm, ER=15 mm, N=10 and M=4, we get pμ=160 microns, pLE=42.1 microns, S=790 microns and f=750 microns.
The light from each active light emitter associated to a channel will reach the eye pupil through lenslets of other channels outside a circle on the eye pupil plane concentric with the eye whose diameter fulfills:
Using again that F=ER (Eq. 4) and that c=2d (Eq. 5), we obtain:
D
max=(4M−3)d−2pμ [Equation 12]
That is, Dmax=10.8 mm, which is much larger than the maximum eye pupil diameter of the users that is expected for in operation (5-7 mm).
The calculation done so far is valid for any position of the eye pupil perpendicular to the z axis, provided that there is an eye pupil tracker and a panel driver that drives the panel opixels and light emitters to modify the clusters accordingly. If the center of the eye pupil shifts, the centers of the clusters should shift by the same amount on the panel plane in this canonical example, because the F=ER (Eq. 4). The shift of cluster centers is discretized to the values pμ, since they are composed by N×N microlenslets. This implies that the print diagonal of Eq. 8 should be enlarged in practice by 2√{square root over (2)}pμ (which is 0.45 mm in this example). Nevertheless, if the lenslet design includes dark corridors (set of o-pixels turned off along the cluster's peripheries), the shift of cluster centers is discretized to the values op, i.e., the o-pixel pitch, so the enlargement of the UPP diagonal is negligible.
Another preferred embodiment is the hexagonal configuration, which is suitable for panels with hexagonal pixel structures (called RGB-delta type) interlacing factors k=31/2 and k=71/2. This configuration produces a UPP on the pupil plane which is closer to a circle, better fitting the eye pupil shape. In the k=31/2 case, the cluster contours are preferable arranged with a. 90 deg rotation with respect to the lenslet contours, to produce the tiling of the partial virtual images. The hexagonal contour of the clusters can be properly defined with the panel o-pixels.
By combining the present invention with the inventions disclosed in PCT2 and PCT8 a further increase in resolution and/or field view can be achieved if the switching time of the panel allows a time multiplexing scheme.
Moreover, color sequential techniques can also be applied to the present invention. For example, the light emitters can be made of an LCD arrangement such that the LCD pixels become the emitters when they allow polarized light to cross through. This light is generated by several R, G, and B LEDs, which feed a lightguide whose purpose is to spread evenly the light through the LCD as in a conventional LCD display. The color sequential scheme is achieved by sequentially switching the R, G and B LEDs feeding the light guide. Note that in this case, at any instant all the openings and consequently all the channels and all the pencils are fed with the same light color. This is important for the interlacing design (see Definitions above) because now two pencils forming the same accommodation pixel have the same color and consequently the eye only perceives an added brightness for this accommodation pixel but not a color combination. In this situation, interlacing can still improve the resolution if the panel fill factor is low enough (ideally 25% or less) so there are opaque regions of areas similar or greater than the lit ones.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. The term “connected” is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening.
The recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein.
All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the invention and does not impose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. The various embodiments and elements can be interchanged or combined in any suitable manner as necessary.
The use of directions, such as forward, rearward, top and bottom, upper and lower are with reference to the embodiments shown in the drawings and, thus, should not be taken as restrictive. Reversing or flipping the embodiments in the drawings would, of course, result in consistent reversal or flipping of the terminology.
No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. There is no intention to limit the invention to the specific form or forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalent.
This application claims benefit of commonly invented and assigned U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/090,795, titled “Lenslet Based Preform Optics”, filed on Oct. 13, 2020. This application is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This application contains subject matter related to commonly assigned WO/2021/113825 (PCT/US2020/063629) with inventors in common, for “Lenslet based ultra-high resolution optics for virtual and mixed reality,” referred to herein as “PCT11”; WO 2015/077718, published 28 May 2015, which is PCT/US 2014/067149 for “Immersive compact display glasses,” referred to below as “PCT1”; WO 2016/118640, published 28 Jul. 2016, which is PCT/US 2016/014151 for “Visual display with time multiplexing,” referred to below as “PCT2”; WO/2018/237263, published 27 Dec. 2018, which is PCT/US2018/038992 for “Visual display with time multiplexing for stereoscopic view,” referred to below as “PCT8”; which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2021/059302 | 10/12/2021 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
63090795 | Oct 2020 | US |