The invention described here relates to displays that are designed to provide operating power and security against theft for hand-held electronics that are offered for sale in a retail setting.
The business of building and servicing retail displays for hand-held electronics has developed into a sophisticated industry. “Big Box” and other large electronics retailers are the major industry customers. The typical display is a countertop-style display that involves a large number of hand-held electronic devices mounted to the countertop via posts or similar kinds of mounting structures.
Mr. Roger Leyden was an early inventor of countertop display assemblies that were initially used to mount film cameras in a retail location. U.S. Pat. No. 5,861,807 (“Leyden '807”) is typical and describes a mounting body that carries a camera. The mounting body is lifted from a pedestal or similar support so that the camera can be examined by a potential purchaser. The pedestal is one of many that would be mounted to a display surface.
Mr. Leyden also utilized retractors that had one or more conductor wires feeding up to the mounting body. To put this in historical perspective, Leyden obtained several patents on display designs during a period of time before digital cameras, cell phones, and PDAs emerged in the marketplace. Security against theft was the primary issue, at the time, rather than supplying operating power to the device. Film cameras had no significant operational power requirements, for example. Therefore, Leyden '807 (as an example) tended to focus on security measures—which is still important today—although power supply to individual devices has taken on greater importance in the last decade because of how hand-held technology and products have evolved.
As far as security is concerned, Leyden '807 remains a viable design from the standpoint that it describes a secondary security sensor cable corning from a mounting body that is connected to a camera. The security sensor is powered by the tether that comes up from beneath the counter. The tether provides both physical security and the electrical signal or power line necessary to drive the sensor.
Because of the large numbers of devices mounted on the modern display, tethering each one creates a cable tangling problem. Leyden may or may not have been the first to address that problem by using a cable reel as a security tether system where an alarm is triggered if the cable or secondary cable connection is severed. However, this development gave rise to the use of cable “retractors” in the industry.
As digital cameras entered the marketplace in the late '90s, along with the expanded use of cell phones and new cell phone designs, a need arose to provide operating power as well as security functionality to individual post positions on large retail displays. Other related problems developed, at the time, involving the burdens imposed on the local salesperson who needed to make power supply changes at the display when new hand-held models were swapped out with old ones, or the retailer changed its mix of brands offered for sale.
Swapping different hand-held models to and from many post positions creates a power cable management problem for the average salesperson, particularly when different hand-helds with different power fittings and voltage requirements are swapped to and from the same post position. Replacing products that have different operating voltages and power jack fittings requires ongoing changes in cabling that will be multiplied many times over according to the number of products on display. It creates a very complex situation in a retail store as inventory rotates.
As a consequence, in or about 1999-2000, a predecessor entity to Merchandising Technologies, Inc. (“MTI”) developed a “universal” mounting puck that involved using a retractor that had a single voltage line connected to the puck for power supply purposes, thus eliminating the need for making power cable changes upstream of the puck's position as product models changed. In other words, the “universal” design provided a generic post position with a retractable tether where no cabling changes were needed underneath the display countertop in order to swap products to and from the post. However, the single voltage power line to the puck still remained part of a multi-conductor retractor cable that continued to have other wires in the cable that provided parallel circuits; one for power and the other for separately feeding power to security sensors (or “security signals”) as per earlier designs like Leyden '807.
As part of the universal design, MTI also developed what is now known in the industry as the “Smart Cable™” which is a short power adaptor cable that steps down the puck voltage (received from the retractor's power line wire) to meet the specific power requirements of the hand-held. When changing out products, the salesperson simply picks the correct “Smart Cable™” to match the product. Thus, attaching the product with a unique “Smart Cable™” and reattaching secondary security sensor cables (if used) became the only thing the salesperson needed to do when swapping products with the MTI design.
In or about 1998, Telefonix, Inc. designed an adaptor cable with a “modular connector” arrangement. This design multiplied the numbers of individual power wires or conductors within the retractor cable, with each one supplying a unique voltage. The design was described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,386,906 (“Burke '906”).
The Burke '906 adaptor cables did allow swapping one hand-held with another to and from a post position and, in this respect, served the power requirements of different hand-helds at the same post position. However, Burke '906 was not marketable because it relies on mechanical “pin” connections to plug into specific line voltages offered by the retractor cable—that is, it had no easy way of adapting if new devices came onto the market that needed other operating voltages.
MTI's early design became the industry standard. However, while Burke '906 and MTI's early design provided different ways to deal with power supply issues for swapping out hand-helds on the display, they shared some similar technical problems that are associated with multi-conductor retractors. This issue related to “physical” security in that retailers want hand-helds to be tethered to the display in a way that makes it difficult to physically remove the hand-held regardless of whether or how many electrical security sensors are used. A typical multi-conductor retractor provides this tethering function. However, the tether is not as physically secure as the steel cable tethers that were used in the retail industry in earlier years, before the advent of electrical security sensors, like Leyden '807. Steel cable tethers fell out of use in the display industry because, obviously, they lack wiring and, therefore, the ability to conduct power and security signals to the mounting puck position.
Another problem with multi-conductor retractors lies in the wear and tear these retractors undergo during the repeated cycling that occurs as the consumer lifts and returns the puck to its original position on the display. Because the retractors are generally low voltage systems, the mechanical wear and tear sometimes alters the voltage transmitted through the wires or causes short circuits. While less of a problem today compared to ten years ago, at one point in time in the development of these products, mounted hand-helds were sensitive to relatively small voltage fluctuations in the power supply.
All of the above represents a variety of technical issues that have gone hand-in-hand with the evolution of the consumer hand-held market and the retailer's need to display powered-up products in an attractive way, while still maintaining theft against security.
There has been a long-felt need to completely eliminate multi-conductor retractors in the retail display industry. At the same time, however, retail displays need to continue to provide device power and security functionalities at the puck position.
The design improvements disclosed here provide a solution. These improvements are a continuation of past improvements developed by MTI commencing from about ten years ago.
The following is a summary of the various improvements disclosed in this document. First and foremost, this disclosure involves retail displays for large numbers of hand-held electronic devices that are intended to be offered for sale at “Big Box” retailers and similar retail outlets. A retail display of this type may be used to sell a wide variety of devices such as digital cameras, cell phones, PDAs, camcorders, hand-held GPS devices, and other types of hand-held electronics. The display is also well-adapted to display new versions or types of hand-held consumer electronic products that are likely to appear in the marketplace in the future.
While not always the case, the display improvements disclosed here will usually be implemented as part of a “countertop” display consisting of a number (or plurality) of individual product positions, called “posts” or “post positions.” This involves mounting each hand-held device to the display by means of a physical post assembly or other base structure that is physically connected or mounted to the countertop. Sometimes the countertop is a flat surface, sometimes it involves stair-stepped display surfaces, or the like. In lieu of a countertop, sometimes the hand-helds are displayed on a wall rack in a retail location. Wall rack displays are more common in cell phone stores, as an example.
It is also common for displays of this kind to be connected to an under-the-counter source module. As a person skilled in the art would know, source modules provide security and power connections for individual post positions. There are many variations in the way this is done.
For the purpose of this disclosure, the term “power signal” is meant to refer to an electrical connection or electrical coupling that provides operating power to a hand-held device or another component associated with a display post position. Similarly, the term “security signal” refers to an electrical connection or electrical coupling to a security sensor, or secondary security sensor cable, or the like. These types of naming conventions are common in both the industry and patent literature relating to retail displays.
According to the improvements described here, transmission of a signal indicating a security breach is done “wirelessly.” The present disclosure focuses on “wireless” security functionality as one of a group of novel features defined in the patentable claims.
Moreover, according to the improvements described here, the power supply to individual hand-helds does not necessarily involve or require a continuous and unbroken wire-to-wire cable connection between source module (or other power source) and the electronic device (which is common to display designs that use multi-conductor retractors).
More specifically, with respect to the wireless functionality described above, and referring to the Burke '906 patent as a basis for comparison (regarding security alarms), Burke '906 relies on a continuous, hard-wired electrical circuit between an under-the-counter source module and one or more security sensors via a multi-conductor retractor. In Burke '906, a hard-wired circuit is provided upstream of the hand-held mounting member by the conductors (wires) in the multi-conductor retractor, which are necessary for providing the electrical connections for security alarms. It should be mentioned that the disclosure in Burke '906 focuses on providing operating power to the hand-held. Nevertheless, Burke also describes security sensor signals and security functionalities.
As indicated above, it is common to use a pressure-type security sensor switch in the mounting member portion of a display post (the “puck”) at the interface position where the hand-held is mounted to the puck. Removal of the hand-held from the interface position, for any reason, triggers a mechanical release or switch where the hand-held meets the puck.
In prior designs, this generated a detectable security breach signal via breaking the circuit defined by the hard-wired circuit connection between puck and source or control modules below the counter. Similarly, it is common to use a secondary security sensor cable that electrically couples the puck to the hand-held. Secondary sensors are used as an auxiliary to primary security sensors that are usually located at the interface between puck and hand-held. Secondary sensors are usually in the form of the type of short, secondary cable sensor that interconnects the puck and device as disclosed in Leyden's '807 patent. Either way, in past designs the security alarm signal is communicated to the source module or other security electronics below the countertop by breaking a hard-wired circuit that is necessarily created or transmitted via a multi-conductor retractor.
In contrast, here, one of the things that sets the present disclosure apart from the prior art involves the elimination of the wires between the power source and the puck, which means that multi-conductor retractors are no longer needed to tether the puck. In one preferred embodiment, this is done by substituting a mechanical reel (e.g., braided steel cable) for conventional multi-conductor retractors.
At this point it should be understood that the term “mechanical reel” specifically means a reel mechanism, other than what is known as a “multi-conductor” reel, that utilizes a steel or metallic cable, or the like, in lieu of a multi-conductor (i.e., multi-wire) retractor having individual conductor wires. A steel cable provides much better physical security than retractor cables that consist of little more than small-gauge wires. There may be other materials in lieu of steel that can provide the same level of physical security. Either way, the present disclosure is able to combine a high level of physical security (i.e., steel cable that is hard to cut) and yet provide the needed electrical power and security requirements of a modern display without hard-wired or wire-to-wire means. The way power and security is provided with a non-conducting tether is summarized below.
In the present design, the puck carries its own electronics' board or “ECB.” The puck electronics resident on the ECB detect and communicate a security breach event, via wireless means, to display system control electronics that are located under the countertop or elsewhere. The wireless transmission of the security event is or may be accomplished in different ways.
One way involves communication of a security breach signal completely wirelessly by using a small transmitter or antenna located within the puck itself, and possibly, carried by the ECB. In another embodiment, the steel cable in the mechanical retractor is used as a transmitting antenna. One way of accomplishing this last functionality is to place a toroid in the base portion of the post assembly, such that the toroid surrounds a portion of the steel cable. The toroid picks up or detects changes in electromagnetic fluctuations in the cable that communicate a security breach condition (e.g., triggered by a pressure sensor on the puck or disconnection of a secondary sensor cable).
Another aspect of the present disclosure involves a cable management apparatus that operates from a single-source power supply (provided by the source module or other power source located under the countertop). This is particularly applicable if a mechanical reel is used at a post position, because the steel cable in the reel is not capable of adequately transmitting a power voltage to the puck.
Unlike prior designs in the present case, a single-source power signal provides everything that is needed to drive either the power needed to operate the hand-held device or the power needed to drive any puck electronics (once again, the puck serves as a mounting member for the hand-held).
The puck electronics will provide the security implementations and other functions that are capable of being carried out at the puck level. In the present case, therefore, a single power source line can provide all the power necessary to provide power, security, or any other electrical functions carried on at the puck level, in lieu of conventional designs that use one power line circuit to the puck for hand-held power and another power line circuit for the purpose of delivering electricity to power security sensors, which is another way of describing a “multi-conductor” retractor or the like. Also, in the present case, the single-source or single-circuit power is distributed or parceled out at the puck level to drive both hand-held power functions and any security sensors. This effectively makes the puck a generic platform location with a universal power source having been translated from a position underneath the countertop to the puck above, for both swapping hand-helds with different power requirements and changing security sensors at the puck level, as needed. Using single source power to drive both power and security at the puck level in this way is believed to be unique.
A portion of the power signal is parceled out at the puck level to the hand-held by puck electronics as a “pass through,” when the puck is at rest on the display. In many cases (e.g., cell phones), the hand-held carries its own battery that is charged via the puck and then supplies operating power when the consumer lifts and operates the device at the display. In this particular situation, therefore, the “pass through” power drives the electronics in the hand-held itself and/or charges the hand-held's battery electronics in more or less the same way as an individual adaptor/charger commonly provided by the hand-held's manufacturer. At the same time, the puck serves as a universal power adaptor for any and all hand-helds to be mounted to the puck via the type of “Smart Cable™” design described above, or otherwise.
Some of the features disclosed here may be used outside the framework of tethered systems. However, while there may be tethering alternatives, in preferred form, the puck will always be mechanically tethered to the display in the manner described above.
As indicated above, there is no power or power signal delivered to the puck via the mechanical tether because it lacks conductor wires. Instead, the puck has spring contacts that mate with complementary contacts in the base portion of the post assembly where the puck normally rests. Only the base portion of the post assembly is hard-wired to the source module or other similar power source. Any power signal supplied via the power source will be supplied at the time the spring contacts electrically engage when the puck is at rest. At that same time, single-circuit power is supplied to the puck's ECB at a sufficiently high voltage and amperage to charge any type of hand-held that will be mounted to the puck and drive any security functions at the puck level.
The hand-held has a unique adaptor cable that electrically couples the hand-held to a power fitting on the puck. In order to step-down the power voltage at the puck, or otherwise adjust it to match the power requirements of the hand-held, the adaptor cable is provided with a unique key circuit that adjusts puck power to meet the needs of the hand-held. In preferred form, this is done by building a resistor circuit into the adaptor cable that matches the puck voltage to the hand-held's power requirements.
In order to facilitate the swapping of one type of hand-held with another (having different power requirements, for example), each type of hand-held will be supplied with its own unique adaptor cable having both the correct power jack fittings (if needed) and the proper resistance value to step-down the voltage available from puck electronics.
Once again, when the puck is at rest, the post assembly contacts are engaged and power passes to the puck, via the ECB, and then is passed through the hand-held's electronics with the voltage delivered to the hand-held being adjusted via the adaptor cable. In the “at rest” position, the hand-held's battery changes in the usual way that simulates being plugged into a conventional adaptor cable when the puck is lifted from the display, the post assembly contacts are broken and the hand-held is powered only by the hand-held's battery while it is examined by the consumer.
Thus, according to one variation on the present disclosure, the puck distributes power to the hand-held's internal battery when the device is at rest. As described above, when the puck is lifted, the hand-held's battery serves as the source for operating power, in the same way a consumer uses the device.
However, because security sensors are not self-powered, the ECB, or puck, as the case may be, independently carries its own battery. The puck battery is similarly charged when the puck is at rest and can drive puck electronics separately after the puck is lifted.
In yet another version, some types of hand-helds will not be displayed with their own internal batteries. In situations of this kind, in the past, the device has been powered by a line directly to the device's power jack fitting via a multi-conductor retractor. This is a common and historical implementation in the display of digital camcorders, for example. In the present case, it is possible to design the footprint of the puck so that it carries a sufficiently large battery to drive both the hand-held and other puck electronics at the same time, when the puck is in “lift” mode. Other power storage devices may be used in lieu of a battery such as, for example, a large capacitor.
As yet another alternative, it is possible to eliminate a mechanical reel and replace it with another type of tethering cable that provides the same tethering function, but without the reel that first pays out cable and then retracts it when the product is returned to the display. An example of an alternative arrangement would be a short “curly-Q” cord that has no electrical function or wires within the cord. As material technologies develop, fiber optic cables may serve as tethers where the cable transmits digital signals that are not used for power.
It is believed the customers (i.e., retailers) for the type of display disclosed here will probably always want the comfort provided by the physical security of a mechanical tether. However, the wireless security functionality offered by the present design allows elimination of any tether at all, if desired.
Because the puck carries its own electronics board, it is possible to create signals that are uniquely identifiable to specific post positions, regardless of whether or not the unique signal is a security signal or some other type of informational signal that is useful to the retailer.
For example, when the post contacts are broken as the puck is lifted, it is possible to use that event to trigger different kinds of display functionalities. In essence, the puck may wirelessly transmit a signal that identifies a lift condition at that specific post position. That signal is uniquely identifiable and can be used for media displays.
It is common to run media content at displays—which can be a combination of running visual media displayed on a screen and/or audio media. The uniquely identifiable triggering signal from a post position can be used to trigger visual or audio media specifically tailored to the branded product at the post position. That is, the retailer may identify that a particular camera brand is mounted at post “A,” for example. When that post is triggered by a lift signal, the control electronics may cause an advertisement specific to the brand or hand-held model that is played while the consumer is examining it. Likewise, when the product is returned, and a different one is lifted, a new, uniquely identifiably signal is wirelessly transmitted for causing different media content to be displayed. This arrangement makes for a useful set of sales features that universally combine sales, security functions, and ease of swapping older hand-held models with new ones as technology changes or new models are developed.
Using wireless signals to identify activity at different post positions opens up additional functions that may be useful to the retailer. For example, the retailer can track the number of “lifts” at each post during a given period of time. Information of this kind reveals which brands are the most popular or whether certain physical locations on the display are better than others, regardless of brand or price.
It would be possible for the retailer to develop a single post plan or “planogram” that universally applies to every display in every store, thus obviating the need to individually program media content at each store. Having the ability to transmit a unique signal that identifies marketing activity at specific post positions enables translation of that signal into a corresponding media event.
As indicated above, prior art displays have relied on multi-conductor cables that are included as part of a reel assembly for providing both electrical power and electrical security signals to the mounting or puck. In other words, the retractor carries one pair of wires for a power circuit that is connected to the power jack of the hand-held and a separate pair of wires for a security circuit that drives security sensors in the puck, or a secondary security cable, or both things at the same time. The advantage of the present invention is that only one power source or circuit from below the countertop is needed in order to drive both the power and security functions emanating from the puck position. Moreover, because power can be supplied when the puck is at “rest,” and there is no need for under-the-counter power supply in “lift” mode, the need to use multi-conductor retractors is eliminated. Instead, mechanical retractors with steel cables can be used.
The foregoing summary will become better understood upon review of the attached drawings which are to be taken in conjunction with the written description set forth below.
In the drawings, like reference numerals and letters refer to like parts throughout the various views, and wherein:
In the drawings, and referring first to
First, beginning with base assembly 12, the display post 10 includes a base assembly portion or fitting 16 that is mounted to a display countertop surface 18. The base portion 16 has an annular flange 20 that rests on top of surface 18. Extending downwardly from the annular flange 20 is a threaded portion 22 that carries a bracket 24. The bracket 24 further carries a mechanical retractor (indicated generally at 26).
The mechanical retractor 26 is conventional in design and includes a spring-loaded steel cable (indicated generally at 28), the length of which is drawn from and returned to the retractor housing 30 as the puck assembly 14 is lifted from and returned to the base assembly 12. The general construction of the mechanical retractor 26 (with steel cable) would be familiar to a person skilled in the art. However, a toroid 32 is mounted to an upper part of the retractor's housing 30. The toroid 32 surrounds the steel cable 28. Its function is further described later.
There are other electrical components (indicated generally at 34) mounted to a circuit board assembly 36 on the reel housing 30. These components electrically connect the puck assembly 14 to an under-the-countertop source module (described later) via cable 38, when the puck assembly 14 is resting on base 16.
Turning now to the puck assembly 14, it includes a lower portion 40 that nests within the space (indicated generally by arrow 42) in base part 20. The upper portion of the puck, indicated at 44, houses a puck electronics control board, or “ECB,” which will be described later in the context of other application drawings. The puck assembly 14 carries a hand-held 46 which is mounted to the puck assembly 14 in conventional ways known to those who are familiar with countertop displays.
Directing attention there,
Turning now to
Another wire assembly 62 connects the female contacts 54 to the circuit board 36 that normally rests above the mechanical retractor 26. The second wire assembly is further connected to cable 38 which, as mentioned above, connects the post assembly 10 to a source module or other under-the-counter control electronics (described later). It should be mentioned at this point that the embodiment illustrated in
As described above, when a “lift” event occurs, the electrical connection that is created by spring contacts 54 and 56 is broken. The only power line connection from under the counter to the puck occurs when the puck assembly or puck 14 is at rest (as shown in
The design offers at the puck, or ECB 58 level, a sufficiently high voltage and amperage to operate any kind of hand-held that might be mounted to the top face surface 66 of the puck assembly 14. For example, the voltage offered at the puck level might be as high as 18 volts. Assuming the amperage is sufficient, this voltage is more than adequate to operate the various types of hand-helds sold on the market today, if the voltage is stepped-down from the puck assembly 14, which will be described later.
Directing the reader's attention to
Referring now to
The adaptor cable 72 connects the ECB 58 to the hand-held's internal battery 76. This, of course, charges battery 76. When the puck assembly 46 is in “lift” mode, the hand-held's battery 76 allows the consumer to operate the hand-held on the puck, so that the consumer can visually inspect the hand-held's display, how its buttons work, etc.
As indicated previously in this disclosure, one of the overall advantages of the post assembly described here is that it provides an easy way for a salesperson to swap different hand-held devices 46 to and from the post assembly position. This is schematically indicated in
In
The puck battery 82 is also charged by ECB circuitry when the puck assembly 14 is at rest. When lifted, the puck battery 82 then serves to drive ECB electronics, which will include one or more security sensors. Referring to
It is also common to use another security sensor at the interface between the hand-held 46 and puck top surface 66.
The pressure button 96 is released when the hand-held 46 is removed. Disconnection of the secondary sensor cable 84 or release of the pressure button 96 will trigger a security signal that is transmitted in the manner described below.
Referring again to
One kind of obvious information to be communicated by ECB 58 relates to a security breach condition that could be triggered by the secondary security cable 84 or pressure button 96 described above. In other words, if a user should attempt and be successful at removing the hand-held 46 from the puck assembly 14, the depressed pressure button 96 will be released thus triggering a signal that is picked up by the ECB board. This, in turn, will cause a change in what is transmitted via the antenna that is created by the mechanical retractor's cable 98.
It is to be appreciated that the wireless functionality described above could be handled in other ways such as, for example, building a small antenna on the puck ECB board 58. However, many of the past problems relating to display technologies of the type described here involves ongoing reliability problems. Post assemblies need to operate for long periods of time without maintenance. Maintenance is a problem for a retailer because these systems are becoming highly sophisticated and the retailer lacks the capability or means to fix serious technical problems when they arise. Therefore, it is believed that creating antenna structure in the form of a mechanical steel retractor cable is a highly reliable way to generate electronic signals over a long period of time without malfunctions. As indicated above, signals transmitted by the cable/antenna 98 are picked up by the toroid 32 that is resident on the mechanical retractor 26 (see
Directing the reader's attention now to
In the previous description relating to
An enlarged view of the control module 102 is illustrated in
Turning now to
Referring now to
Post assembly position 10B in
Redirecting attention briefly to
Referring back to the media player 128, when the puck at post position 10B is lifted, the controller 102 detects the lift signal and communicates it to the media player. The UIM module 122, in essence, translates the signal and instructs the media player 128 to play content that has been uniquely mapped to post position 10B.
For example, if post position 10B carries a particular make, model or brand of a camera, the media player 128 is instructed to play pre-stored content for that particular device. The media content may be visually displayed via a conventional monitor 134 or it may be combined with audio content that is broadcast from local speakers (not shown) that explains unique features about the device.
It is to be appreciated at this point, that the post assembly 10 described herein, when implemented in an overall system of the kind illustrated in
An advantage to the system is that it is possible to interface a display at any particular store with media content that is created off-site and provided via the internet or other means, as indicated at 148. In this way, and for large retailers who will have their own media departments, in particular, the retailer may assemble media content 150 at a separate corporate location and transmit it to individual displays (at different store locations) from media storage 152. This may be accomplished in different ways that include either adjusting content on a per post basis or generically mapping out (“planogram”) all post positions at the same time. With respect to the latter concept, some retailers may install identical displays having the same arrangement and number of post positions, monitors, etc. at a variety of stores. In situations of this kind, it is possible to develop generic plans, as shown at
Next, returning to
Finally, the light ring system 154 may also be used to indicate a wide variety of alerts that communicate whether each post position is operating correctly. These alerts may range from steady light output at each post position (indicating the puck assembly 14 is armed and charging at that post position when at rest) or no light (indicating lack of power) different kinds of flashing and/or alarm siren cycles may also be used to indicate different kinds of alert conditions, as reflected in
Referring now to
The base 204 has an upper cradle portion that is generally indicated by reference numeral 220 in
Also, referring to
The recesses (222, 224, 226, 228) and corresponding projections (230, 232, 234) on the puck 202 allow the puck to be lifted and replaced at different angular orientations relative to the base 204. The advantage of this arrangement is that it enables electrical contacts to be made between the puck 202 and underlying electrical contacts within the base 204, so that the puck 202 can be returned to the post as different angular positions, relative to its position when “lifted,” and still make the needed charging contacts. The charging contacts would, of course, be similar to those previously described. However, every quadrant of the puck 202 (four sides) will have dedicated contacts that engage with one or more contacts in the base, regardless of the puck's angular position when returned to the base.
A key tool 248 locks the electronics portion 238 of the puck 202 (and enables release, when needed). As disclosed here, the key tool 248 would be required for “release,” but not for attachment of the electronics portion 238 to item 242. The fitting 242 functions as a puck (base) part when connected to the electronics portion. As indicated above, the fitting 242 will have an integrated swivel that alleviates torsional twisting forces on the tether 206. As another alternative, the electronics portion may have a light lens built into the puck 202 as a system status indicator. Arrow 250 indicates a suitable location. Arrow 252 points to the location of one or more side ports (mini or micro-USB) for cable connections.
An advantage of the alternative embodiment is that it enables easy product swapping to and from the end of tether 206. One significant difference between the alternative design illustrated in
Referring specifically to
Directing attention to
The housing body 285 has upper and lower parts 285A, 285B, respectively. The upper part 285A is removable from the lower part 285B via screws 287. In essence, the upper part 285A serves as a cap for the modular retractor 283 and a resting place for the puck portion 279.
When the upper part or cap 285A is removed (see
Rather than undertake a complicated sequence of repair steps and electrical disconnections—which is typical for retractor-based displays in use today, the present disclosure enables simple and easy retractor replacement by simply using a tool 26 to release the puck portion 279 from the quick-connect piece 281; undoing a small number of screws 287 to remove cap 285A; make a simple swap of the retractor 283; and then replace the cap portion 285 (with the screws 287) and slide the puck portion 279 back on the quick-connect 281. The embodiment illustrated in
Finally, the display 286 illustrated in
Referring now to the next embodiment illustrated in
The charge cup 322 has four scallops indicated generally at 334. This feature was previously described and allows the puck portion 279 to be lifted, rotated and returned to the post 320, while reengaging with electrical contacts at any position. At other words, each scalloped portion 334 of the charging cup 322 has its own set of contacts 336 at each one of a 90 degree position. This allows the display 10 to lifted from the post 320, examined by the user, and the user can place the device on the post 10 in a different rotational position from the position it was in when lifted. Even if returned in a different rotational position, the charging contacts will be reinitiated so that the puck/device combination can recharge when in the rest position.
Referring now to
Finally,
It is to be appreciated that the foregoing description sets forth the best known examples and embodiments. It is not intended that any of the foregoing description be used to limit the scope of the patent protection. Instead, all patent protection is to be defined solely by the patent claim or claims that follow this description, the interpretation of which is to be made according to the legal rules of patent claim interpretation and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/221,497, filed Jul. 27, 2016 and entitled “Display for Hand-Held Electronics”, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,786,140, where the Ser. No. 15/221,497 application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/092,845, filed Nov. 27, 2013 and entitled “Display for Hand-Held Electronics”, where the 14/092,845 application (1) claims priority to provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/730,450, filed Nov. 27, 2012 and entitled “Retail Merchandise Display with Swappable Retractor”, (2) claims priority to provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/730,454, filed Nov. 27, 2012 and entitled “Display Fixture for Retail Merchandise”, (3) claims priority to provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/732,064, filed Nov. 30, 2012 and entitled “VHB Cure Tool”, and (4) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14,066,606, filed Oct. 29, 2013 and entitled “Display for Hand-Held Electronics”, and where the 14/066,606 application (1) claims priority to provisional U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/720,344, filed Oct. 30, 2012 and entitled “Retail Merchandise Display”, and (2) is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/819,944, filed Jun. 21, 2010 and entitled “Display for Hand-Held Electronics”, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,617.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
883335 | O'Connor | Mar 1908 | A |
3444547 | Surek | May 1969 | A |
3780909 | Callahan et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4075878 | Best | Feb 1978 | A |
4117465 | Timblin | Sep 1978 | A |
4335931 | Kinnear | Jun 1982 | A |
4354613 | Desai et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4384688 | Smith | May 1983 | A |
4590337 | Engelmore | May 1986 | A |
4714184 | Young et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4772878 | Kane | Sep 1988 | A |
4898493 | Blankenburg | Feb 1990 | A |
5072213 | Close | Dec 1991 | A |
5146205 | Keifer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176465 | Hoisted | Jan 1993 | A |
5246183 | Leyden | Sep 1993 | A |
5543782 | Rothbaum et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552771 | Leyden et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5685436 | Davet | Nov 1997 | A |
5861807 | Leyden et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6039496 | Bishop | Mar 2000 | A |
6170775 | Kovacik et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6236435 | Gertz | May 2001 | B1 |
6380855 | Ott | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386906 | Burke | May 2002 | B1 |
6476717 | Gross et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6502727 | Decoteau | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6581421 | Chmela et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6659382 | Ryczek | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6731212 | Hirose et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6748707 | Buchalter et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761579 | Fort et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6786766 | Chopra | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799994 | Burke | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6831560 | Gresset | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6896543 | Fort et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6946961 | Frederiksen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961401 | Nally et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7015596 | Pail | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7053774 | Sedon et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7081822 | Leyden et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101187 | Deconinck et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7132952 | Leyden et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7135972 | Bonato | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7154039 | Marszalek et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7209038 | Deconinck | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7287652 | Scholen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7327276 | Deconinck et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7385522 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7387003 | Marszalek et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7446659 | Marsilio et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7522047 | Belden, Jr. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7626500 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7667601 | Rabinowitz et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7688205 | Ott | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7710266 | Belden, Jr. et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724135 | Rapp | May 2010 | B2 |
7737843 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737844 | Scott et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737845 | Fawcett et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737846 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744404 | Henson et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7909641 | Henson et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7969305 | Belden, Jr. et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7971845 | Galant | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8009348 | Zehner et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
D649076 | Alexander | Nov 2011 | S |
8102262 | Irmscher et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
D663972 | Alexander et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
8499384 | Zerhusen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8558688 | Henson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8698617 | Henson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8698618 | Henson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8749194 | Kelsch et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8814128 | Trinh et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8844972 | Riley et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8847759 | Bisesti et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8904686 | Greer | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8955807 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8963498 | Ferguson | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9092960 | Wheeler | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9097380 | Wheeler | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9220358 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9269247 | Fawcett et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9303809 | Reynolds et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9373236 | Oehl et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396631 | Fawcett et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9478110 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9576452 | Fawcett et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9659472 | Fawcett et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9786140 | Henson et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10026281 | Henson et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20010049222 | Fort et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020085343 | Wu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020162366 | Chmela et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030007634 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010859 | Ryczek | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040003150 | Deguchi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040077210 | Kollmann | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040201449 | Denison et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050073413 | Sedon et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088572 | Pandit et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113036 | Lita | May 2005 | A1 |
20050165806 | Roatis et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050206522 | Leyden et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060001541 | Leyden et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070075914 | Bates | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070159328 | Belden et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070229259 | Irmscher et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080168806 | Belden et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169923 | Belden et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080222849 | Lavoie | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090007390 | Tsang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090033492 | Rapp et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090173868 | Fawcett et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110068919 | Rapp et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110254661 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283754 | Ezzo et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110303816 | Horvath et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309934 | Henson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120037783 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120043451 | Alexander et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120119910 | Belden, Jr. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120205326 | Richter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120217371 | Abdollahzadeh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120280810 | Wheeler | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286118 | Richards | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130026322 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043369 | Wheeler | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130161054 | Allison et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130168527 | Wheeler et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130238516 | Moock et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268316 | Moock et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140168884 | Wylie | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150048625 | Weusten et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160042620 | Dandie et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160239796 | Grant et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170193780 | Moock et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170345266 | Henson et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180025596 | Henson et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180049563 | Henson et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180144593 | Henson et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
506665 | Oct 2009 | AT |
2465692 | Nov 2004 | CA |
202009013722 | Jan 2011 | DE |
0745747 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1575249 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1058183 | Nov 2004 | ES |
2595227 | Sep 1987 | FR |
2768906 | Apr 1999 | FR |
2868459 | Oct 2005 | FR |
2427056 | Dec 2006 | GB |
2440600 | Feb 2008 | GB |
H0573857 | Oct 1993 | JP |
H0668913 | Mar 1994 | JP |
1997-259368 | Oct 1997 | JP |
3100287 | Oct 2000 | JP |
1997031347 | Aug 1997 | WO |
2004038670 | May 2004 | WO |
2009042905 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2011045058 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2012039794 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012069816 | May 2012 | WO |
2013151130 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013015855 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013068036 | May 2013 | WO |
2013134484 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2014019072 | Feb 2014 | WO |
2014107184 | Jul 2014 | WO |
2014134718 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015050710 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015051840 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“35 mm Camera Display”—Walmart Publication 1995. |
“Declaration of Mike Cook”, Vanguard Products Group, Inc. v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-392-BR, U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Oct. 20, 2010, pp. 1-7. |
“Declaration of Thaine Allison in Support of Patent Owner's Reply to Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Motion to Amend”, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,909,641, Case IPR2013-00122, Feb. 5, 2014, pp. 1-13. |
“Deposition of Thaine Allison, III”, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,909,641, Case IPR2013-00122, Feb. 24, 2014, pp. 1-198. |
“MTI Freedom Universal 2.0 Product Manual”, Dec. 2008, pp. 1-21. |
“Reasons for Substantial New Question of Patentability and Supplemental Examination Certificate”, Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,909,641, Case IPR2013-00122, Jan. 30, 2013, pp. 1-12. |
Excerpts from Bruce Schneier, Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C (1994). |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/037235 dated Oct. 21, 2011. |
MTI 2008 PowerPoint, “Vanguard Program” (Exhibit 1005 of Declaration of Mike Cook), pp. 1-9. |
Propelinteractive, “Freedom Universal 2 Animation_003.wmv”, YouTube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_odGNnQv0BQ8t=1s, published on Feb. 16, 2010 (see sample screenshots, pp. 1-24). |
Propelinteractive, “Installing LP3 Old Version”, YouTube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRUaOFWiDRw&t=1s, published on Jun. 28, 2010 (see sample screenshots, pp. 1-9). |
Propelinteractive, “MTI LP3 Product Mounting”, YouTube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX4TEuj1jCI, published on Jun. 23, 2010 (see sample screenshots, pp. 1-11). |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/819,944, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,617, filed Jun. 21, 2010. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,107, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,698,618, filed Sep. 22, 2010. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/457,348, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,558,688, filed Apr. 26, 2012. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/066,606, filed Oct. 29, 2013 (now abandoned). |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/092,845, filed Nov. 27, 2013 (now abandoned). |
Protex International Corp., “Instructions for PowerPro Detangler”, 2005, 1 page. |
Protex International Corp., “Instructions for PowerPro Sensor Head Cameras and Camcorders (Power and Security)”, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Protex International Corp., “PowerPro System”, 2006, pp. 1-2. |
Retailgeek, “Virtual Tour of MTI Retail Innovation Center in 2009,” YouTube Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wUvcDAmhj0, published on Aug. 2, 2010 (see transcript and sample screenshots, pp. 1-20). |
Reuters, “MTI Begins Shipping Freedom™ Universal 2.0 Merchandising Solution”, Oct. 1, 2008, pp. 1-3. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/607,802, filed Mar. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/620,621, filed Apr. 5, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/774,870, filed Mar. 8, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/884,098, filed Sep. 29, 2013. |
UNICAM Europe, “Freedom Lp3 4.17.09”, SlideShare Presentation https://www.slideshare.net/Borfu/freedom-p3-41709, published on Jul. 28, 2009 (pp. 1-9). |
“Complaint for Civil Contempt, Breach of Contract, Declaratory Judgment, Injunction and Accounting”, Vanguard Products Group, Inc., and Telefonix, Inc. v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-392 (USDC, District of Oregon, Portland Division) dated Dec. 13, 2017, pp. 1-39 (cited as Exhibit B in IDS Citation Nos. 4 & 5). |
“Complaint for Injunction and Damages”, Mobile Tech., Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. and MTI v. Invue Security Products Inc., Case No. 2:17-cv-07491 (Central District of California, Western Division) dated Oct. 13, 2017, p. 1-83. |
“Declaration of Thaine Allison”, Vanguard Products Group, Inc., and Telefonix, Inc. v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-392 (USDC, District of Oregon) dated Dec. 13, 2017, pp. 1-16 (cited as Exhibit C in IDS Citation Nos. 4 & 5). |
“Defendant's Amended Answer and Counterclaim to Complaint for Injunction and Damages”, Mobile Tech., Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. and MTI v. Invue Security Products Inc., Case No. 3:18-cv-00052 (Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division) dated Feb. 2, 2018, pp. 1-77. |
“Defendant's Answer and Counterclaim to Complaint for Injunction and Damages”, Mobile Tech., Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. and MTI v. Invue Security Products Inc., Case No. 2:17-cv-07491 (Central District of Califomia, Nestern Division) dated Dec. 13, 2017, pp. 1-53. |
“Final Judgment by Consent and Permanent Injunction”, Vanguard Products Group, Inc., and Telefonix, Inc. v. Merchandising Technologies, Inc., Case No. 3:07-cv-1405 (USDC, District of Oregon) dated May 11, 2009, pp. 1-5 cited as Exhibit A in IDS Citation Nos. 4 & 5). |
“Plaintiffs Answer to Defendant's Counterclaims”, Mobile Tech., Inc. d/b/a Mobile Technologies Inc. and MTI v. Invue Security Products Inc., Case No. 2:17-cv-07491 (Central District of California, Western Division) dated Jan. 12, 2018, pp. 1-20. |
Extended European Search Report for EP11827111.3 dated Oct. 30, 2017. |
Freedom LP3 brochure, MTI, Sep. 2009, 1 page. |
Freedom LP3 Product Manual, MTI, Mar. 2010, pp. 1-20. |
Freedom LP3 Product Manual, MTI, Mar. 2011, pp. 1-25. |
Freedom LP3 Quick Reference Guide, MTI, Feb. 2010, pp. 1-2. |
Freedom One Product Manual, MTI, Jun. 2011, pp. 1-32. |
Freedom One Product Manual, MTI, Jun. 2012, pp. 1-32. |
Freedom One Sell Sheet, MTI, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Machine Translation of WO2011/045058 published Apr. 21, 2011 (Logokett GMBH). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,837 dated May 18, 2018. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/221,497, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,786,140, filed Jul. 27, 2016. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/679,620, filed Aug. 17, 2017. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,914, filed Oct. 4, 2017. |
Prosecution History for U.S. Appl. No. 15/826,017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,026,281, filed Nov. 29, 2017. |
Response for Extended European Search Report for EP118271113 dated Oct. 30, 2017. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,786,140; Case IPR2019-00078, Filed Oct. 12, 2018, with Exhibits, 1202 pages. |
Petition for Inter Partes Review for U.S. Pat. No. 9,786,140; Case IPR2019-00079, Filed Oct. 12, 2018 with Exhibits, 1199 pages. |
Petition for Post-Grant Review for U.S. Pat. No. 10,026,281; Case PGR2019-00019, Filed Nov. 21, 2018 with Exhibits, 1283 pages. |
InVue Security Products, Inc.'s Answer and Counterclaims to Complaint; Case 3:18-cv-00505-RJC-DSC, Filed Sep. 25, 2018, 579 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180033267 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61730450 | Nov 2012 | US | |
61730454 | Nov 2012 | US | |
61732064 | Nov 2012 | US | |
61720344 | Oct 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15221497 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 15724941 | US | |
Parent | 14092845 | Nov 2013 | US |
Child | 15221497 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14066606 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14092845 | US | |
Parent | 12819944 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 14066606 | US |