Patent Grant
8519923
In general, the invention relates to the field of imaging displays, in particular, the invention relates to circuits for controlling light modulators incorporated into imaging displays.
Displays built from mechanical light modulators are an attractive alternative to displays based on liquid crystal technology. Mechanical light modulators are fast enough to display video content with good viewing angles and with a wide range of color and grey scale. Mechanical light modulators have been successful in projection display applications. Backlit displays using mechanical light modulators have not yet demonstrated sufficiently attractive combinations of brightness and low power. There is a need in the art for fast, bright, low-powered mechanically actuated displays. Specifically there is a need for mechanically actuated displays that can be driven at high speeds and at low voltages for improved image quality and reduced power consumption.
In one aspect the invention relates to a display apparatus that includes at least one electrical interconnect which is shared among pixels in multiple columns and multiple rows of an array of pixels. More particularly, in one embodiment, the invention relates to a display apparatus including an array of pixels and a control matrix. The array of pixels includes a substrate having a plurality of apertures. The array of pixels also includes a plurality of shutters. Each shutter corresponds to one aperture. Each pixel includes one or more aperture shutter pairs. The shutters are configured for transverse motion relative to the substrate. The control matrix includes a common electrical connection among a set of pixels. The set of pixels includes pixels in multiple rows and multiple columns of the array of pixels. The control matrix also includes multiple data voltage interconnects. Each column of pixels in the array of pixels has its own corresponding data voltage interconnect. The control matrix includes, for a pixel in the array of pixels, a switch that controls actuation of a corresponding shutter in response to a voltage applied to the data voltage interconnect.
In one embodiment, the common electrical connection serves as a global actuation interconnect. In such embodiments, the application of a data voltage to the data voltage interconnect substantially reduces the minimum voltage change needed to initiate movement of a shutter. When the common electrical connection serves as a global actuation interconnect, the common electrical connection provides that additional minimum voltage change. Thus, in response to a global actuation voltage being applied to the common electrical connection, all shutters connected to the common electrical connection that are going to move to form a given image frame move in concert. The display apparatus may also include a global actuation voltage source for applying a voltage to the common electrical connection. global actuation voltage to the common electrical connection.
In another embodiment, the common electrical connection serves as a common current drain for accepting current stored in the pixels to which the common electrical connection connects. In some embodiments, the shutters actuate in response to the discharging of a corresponding capacitor. The common electrical connection, when serving as a common current drain accepts the current resulting from the discharge, thereby allowing actuation and movement of the shutters.
In one embodiment, the shutters are supported by bi-stable shutter assemblies. The shutter assemblies may be electrically and/or mechanically bi-stable. In one embodiment, a shutter assembly includes both a shutter-open actuator for moving the shutter transversely in one path transverse to the substrate, thereby opening the shutter and a shutter close actuator for moving the shutter transversely in an opposite path transverse to the substrate, thereby closing the shutter. In one embodiment, a pixel may also include a memory element for storing one or more intended shutter positions. In one such embodiment, the switch corresponding to the pixel stores intended shutter positions by storing the data voltage on the memory unit.
In a second aspect, the invention relates to forming in image on a display, in part by making use of an electrical connection that is shared among pixels in multiple rows and multiple columns of an array of pixels in a display apparatus. In one embodiment, the method includes selecting a first scan line of the display. The first scan line includes a plurality of pixels. For at least one of the pixels in the selected scan line, the voltage across an actuator is regulated to enable a shutter corresponding to the actuator to move transversely adjacent an aperture formed in a substrate upon which the shutter is built. The method further includes selecting a second scan line include a second set of pixels and regulating the voltage across an actuator in one of the pixels in the second set of pixels, thereby enabling a second shutter to move transversely adjacent a second aperture in the substrate. The voltages across the actuators are regulated, in one embodiment, by the application of a data voltages to switches corresponding to the actuators. A pixel may have a single switch or it may have separate switches for opening and closing the shutter. In one embodiment, the magnitude of the voltage regulated by the switch is significantly higher than the magnitude of the data voltage. Enabling a shutter to move, in one embodiment, includes substantially reducing the minimum voltage change needed to be applied to an actuator for actuation to occur.
The method also includes applying a global actuation voltage to a global actuation interconnect connecting pixels in multiple columns and multiple scan lines of the display, thereby actuating the actuators. In one embodiment, the global actuation interconnect provides a common current drain for accepting current stored in the pixels in the array of pixels, thereby allowing for actuation of the enabled actuators. Light is then directed towards the apertures to form an image on the display.
In one embodiment, the shutters in the array of pixels are supported by shutter assemblies. The shutter assemblies may be electrically and/or mechanically bi-stable.
The foregoing discussion will be understood more readily from the following detailed description of the invention with reference to the following drawings:
To provide an overall understanding of the invention, certain illustrative embodiments will now be described, including apparatus and methods for displaying images. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the systems and methods described herein may be adapted and modified as is appropriate for the application being addressed and that the systems and methods described herein may be employed in other suitable applications, and that such other additions and modifications will not depart from the scope hereof.
This application is related to, and incorporates herein by reference, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/218,690, filed Sep. 2, 2005, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/251,035, filed Oct. 14, 2005, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/251,452, filed Oct. 14, 2005, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/251,034, filed Oct. 14, 2005, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Each shutter assembly 102 includes a shutter 108 and an aperture 109. To illuminate a pixel 106 in the image 104, the shutter 108 is positioned such that it allows light to pass through the aperture 109 towards a viewer. To keep a pixel 106 unlit, the shutter 108 is positioned such that it obstructs the passage of light through the aperture 109. The aperture 109 is defined by an opening patterned through a reflective or light-absorbing material in each shutter assembly 102.
The display apparatus also includes a control matrix connected to the substrate and to the shutter assemblies for controlling the movement of the shutters. The control matrix includes a series of electrical interconnects (e.g., interconnects 110, 112, and 114), including at least one write-enable interconnect 110 (also referred to as a “scan-line interconnect”) per row of pixels, one data interconnect 112 for each column of pixels, and one common interconnect 114 providing a common voltage to all pixels, or at least pixels from both multiple columns and multiples rows in the display apparatus 100. In response to the application of an appropriate voltage (the “write-enabling voltage, Vwe”), the write-enable interconnect 110 for a given row of pixels prepares the pixels in the row to accept new shutter movement instructions. The data interconnects 112 communicate the new movement instructions in the form of data voltage pulses. The data voltage pulses applied to the data interconnects 112, in some implementations, directly contribute to an electrostatic movement of the shutters. In other implementations, the data voltage pulses control switches, e.g., transistors or other non-linear circuit elements that control the application of separate actuation voltages, which are typically higher in magnitude than the data voltages, to the shutter assemblies 102. The application of these actuation voltages then results in the electrostatic movement of the shutters 108.
In other cases the data drivers 154 are configured to apply only a reduced set of 2, 3, or 4 digital voltage levels to the control matrix. These voltage levels are designed to set, in digital fashion, either an open state or a closed state to each of the shutters 108.
The scan drivers 152 and the data drivers 154 are connected to digital controller circuit 156 (also referred to as the “controller 156”). The controller includes a display interface 158 which processes incoming image signals into a digital image format appropriate to the spatial addressing and the gray scale capabilities of the display. The pixel location and gray scale data of each image is stored in a frame buffer 159 so that the data can be fed out as needed to the data drivers 154. The data is sent to the data drivers 154 in mostly serial fashion, organized in predetermined sequences grouped by rows and by image frames. The data drivers 154 can include series to parallel data converters, level shifting, and for some applications digital to analog voltage converters.
All of the drivers (e.g., scan drivers 152, data drivers 154, actuation driver 153 and global actuation driver 155) for different display functions are time-synchronized by a timing-control 160 in the controller 156. Timing commands coordinate the illumination of red, green and blue lamps 162, 164, and 166 via lamp drivers 168, the write-enabling and sequencing of specific rows of the array of pixels, the output of voltages from the data drivers 154, and for the output of voltages that provide for shutter actuation.
The controller 156 determines the sequencing or addressing scheme by which each of the shutters 108 in the array can be re-set to the illumination levels appropriate to a new image 104. New images can 104 be set at periodic intervals. For instance, for video displays, the color images 104 or frames of the video are refreshed at frequencies ranging from 10 to 300 Hertz. In some embodiments the setting of an image frame is synchronized with the illumination of a backlight such that alternate image frames are illuminated with an alternating series of colors, such as red, green, and blue. The image frames for each respective color is referred to as a color sub-frame. In this method, referred to as the field sequential color method, if the color sub-frames are alternated at frequencies in excess of 20 Hz, the human brain will average the alternating frame images into the perception of an image having a broad and continuous range of colors.
If the display apparatus 100 is designed for the digital switching of shutters 108 between open and closed states, the controller 156 can control the addressing sequence and/or the time intervals between image frames to produce images 104 with appropriate gray scale. The process of generating varying levels of grayscale by controlling the amount of time a shutter 108 is open in a particular frame is referred to as time division gray scale. In one embodiment of time division gray scale, the controller 156 determines the time period or the fraction of time within each frame that a shutter 108 is allowed to remain in the open state, according to the illumination level or gray scale desired of that pixel. In another embodiment of time division gray scale, the frame time is split into, for instance, 15 equal time-duration sub-frames according to the illumination levels appropriate to a 4-bit binary gray scale. The controller 156 then sets a distinct image into each of the 15 sub-frames. The brighter pixels of the image are left in the open state for most or all of the 15 sub-frames, and the darker pixels are set in the open state for only a fraction of the sub-frames. In another embodiment of time-division gray scale, the controller circuit 156 alters the duration of a series of sub-frames in proportion to the bit-level significance of a coded gray scale word representing an illumination value. That is, the time durations of the sub-frames can be varied according to the binary series 1,2,4,8 . . . . The shutters 108 for each pixel are then set to either the open or closed state in a particular sub-frame according to the bit value at a corresponding position within the binary word for its intended gray level.
A number of hybrid techniques are available for forming gray scale which combine the time division techniques described above with the use of either multiple shutters 108 per pixel or via the independent control of backlight intensity. These techniques are described further below.
Addressing the control matrix, i.e., supplying control information to the array of pixels, is, in one implementation, accomplished by a sequential addressing of individual lines, sometimes referred to as the scan lines or rows of the matrix. By applying Vwe to the write-enable interconnect 110 for a given scan line and selectively applying data voltage pulses Vd to the data interconnects 112 for each column, the control matrix can control the movement of each shutter 108 in the write-enabled row. By repeating these steps for each row of pixels in the display apparatus 100, the control matrix can complete the set of movement instructions to each pixel in the display apparatus 100.
In one alternative implementation, the control matrix applies Vwe to the write-enable interconnects 110 of multiple rows of pixels simultaneously, for example, to take advantage of similarities between movement instructions for pixels in different rows of pixels, thereby decreasing the amount of time needed to provide movement instructions to all pixels in the display apparatus 100. In another alternative implementation, the rows are addressed in a non-sequential, e.g., in a pseudo-randomized order, in order to minimize visual artifacts that are sometimes produced, especially in conjunction with the use of a coded time division gray scale.
In alternative embodiments, the array of pixels and the control matrices that control the pixels incorporated into the array may be arranged in configurations other than rectangular rows and columns. For example, the pixels can be arranged in hexagonal arrays or curvilinear rows and columns. In general, as used herein, the term scan-line shall refer to any plurality of pixels that share a write-enabling interconnect.
Shutter Assemblies
Each actuator 205 includes a compliant load beam 206 connecting the shutter 202 to a load anchor 208. The load anchors 208 along with the compliant load beams 206 serve as mechanical supports, keeping the shutter 202 suspended proximate to the surface. The surface includes one or more apertures 211 for admitting the passage of light. The load anchors 208 physically connect the compliant load beams 206 and the shutter 202 to the surface and electrically connect the load beams 206 to a bias voltage, in some instances, ground.
Each actuator 204 also includes a compliant drive beam 216 positioned adjacent to each load beam 206. The drive beams 216 couple at one end to a drive beam anchor 218 shared between the drive beams 216. The other end of each drive beam 216 is free to move. Each drive beam 216 is curved such that it is closest to the load beam 206 near the free end of the drive beam 216 and the anchored end of the load beam 206.
In operation, a display apparatus incorporating the shutter assembly 200 applies an electric potential to the drive beams 216 via the drive beam anchor 218. A second electric potential may be applied to the load beams 206. The resulting potential difference between the drive beams 216 and the load beams 206 pulls the free ends of the drive beams 216 towards the anchored ends of the load beams 206, and pulls the shutter ends of the load beams 206 toward the anchored ends of the drive beams 216, thereby driving the shutter 202 transversely towards the drive anchor 218. The compliant members 206 act as springs, such that when the voltage across the beams 206 and 216 potential is removed, the load beams 206 push the shutter 202 back into its initial position, releasing the stress stored in the load beams 206.
A shutter assembly, such as shutter assembly 200, that incorporates a passive restoring force mechanism is generally referred to herein as an elastic shutter assembly. A number of elastic restoring mechanisms can be built into or in conjunction with electrostatic actuators, the compliant beams illustrated in shutter assembly 200 providing just one example. Elastic shutter assemblies can be constructed such that in an unactivated, or relaxed state, the shutters are either opened or closed. For illustrative purposes, it is assumed below that the elastic shutter assemblies described herein are constructed to be closed in their relaxed state.
As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/251,035, referred to above, depending on the curvature of the drive beams 216 and load beams 206, the shutter assembly may either be controlled in a analog or digital fashion. When the beams have a strongly non-linear or divergent curvature (beams diverging with more than a second order curvature) the application of an analog actuation voltage across drive beams 216 and the load beams 206 results in a predetermined incremental displacement of the shutter 202. Thus, the magnitude of shutter 202 displacement can be varied by applying different magnitude voltages across the drive beams 216 and the load beams 206. Shutter assemblies 200 including more curved beams are therefore used to implement analog gray scale processes.
For shutter assemblies with less curved beams (beams diverging with second order curvature or less), the application of a voltage across the drive beams 216 and the load beams 206 results in shutter displacement if the voltage is greater than a threshold voltage (Vat). Application of a voltage equaling or exceeding Vat results in the maximum shutter displacement. That is, if the shutter 202 is closed absent the application of a voltage equaling or exceeding the threshold, application of any voltage equaling or exceeding Vat fully opens the shutter. Such shutter assemblies are utilized for implementing time division and/or digital area division gray scale processes in various embodiments of the display apparatus 100.
b are isometric views of a second shutter assembly 300 suitable for use in the display apparatus 100.
To drive one of the shutters in one of the shutter assemblies, a voltage is applied across the load beam 406 and one of the drive beams 408. To generate the voltage, a first electric potential is applied to the selected drive beam and a second electric potential is applied to the load beam 406 and to the shutter 404. The first and second electric potentials may be of the same polarity or they may be of opposite polarities. They also may have the same magnitude or they may have different magnitudes. Either potential may also be set to ground. In order for the shutter assembly to actuate (i.e., for the shutter to change its position) the difference between the first and second potentials must equal or exceed an actuation threshold voltage Vat.
In most embodiments, Vat is reached by applying voltages of substantially different magnitudes to the selected drive beam and the load beam. For example, assuming Vat is 40V, the display apparatus 100 may apply 30V to the drive beam and −10V to the load beam, resulting in a potential difference of 40V. For purposes of controlling power dissipation, however, it is also important to consider and control the absolute voltage applied to each electrode with respect to the ground or package potential of the display. The power required to apply electric potentials to an array of actuators is proportional to the capacitance seen by the voltage source (P=½ fCV2), where f is the frequency of the drive signal, V is the voltage of the source and C is the total capacitance seen by the source. The total capacitance has several additive components, including the capacitance that exists between the load beam and drive beam, the source-drain capacitance of transistors along an interconnect line between the voltage source and the actuator (particularly for those transistors whose gates are closed), the capacitance between the interconnect line and its surroundings, including neighboring shutter assemblies and/or crossover lines, and the capacitance between the load or drive beams and their surroundings, including neighboring shutter assemblies or the display package. Since the load beam 406 is electrically coupled to the shutter 404, the capacitance of the load beam 406 includes the capacitance of the shutter 404. Since the shutter comprises typically a large fraction of area of the pixel, the capacitance between the load beam and its surroundings can represent a significant fraction of the total capacitance seen by the voltage source. Furthermore, because of the difference in area of the combined load beam 406 and shutter 404 and the area of the drive beam 408 is significant, the capacitance between the load beam and its surroundings is typically much larger than that between the drive beam and its surroundings. As a result, the CV2 power loss experienced by voltage sources connected to either the drive or the load beams will be significantly different even if the range of their voltage excursions were to be the same. For this reason, it is generally advantageous to connect the higher capacitance end of the actuator, i.e., the load beam, to a voltage source that either does not change in voltage significantly with respect to ground or package potential, or to a voltage source that does not change voltage with the highest frequencies required by the drive system. For example, if a 40 volt difference is required between the load beam 406 and the drive beam 408 to actuate the actuator, it will be advantageous if the voltage difference between the drive beam and the ground or case potential represents at least half if not most of the 40 volts.
The dashed line overlaid on the shutter assembly array 400 depicts the bounds of a single pixel 410. The pixel 410 includes two shutter assemblies 402, each of which may be independently controlled. By having two shutter assemblies 402 per pixel 410, a display apparatus incorporating the shutter assembly array 400 can provide three levels of gray scale per pixel using area division gray scale. More particularly, the pixel could be driven into the following states: both shutter assemblies closed; one shutter assembly opened and one shutter assembly closed: or both shutter assemblies open. Thus, the resulting image pixel can be off, at half brightness, or at full brightness. By having each shutter assembly 402 in the pixel 410 have different sized apertures, a display apparatus could provide yet another level of gray scale using only area division gray scale. The shutter assemblies 200, 300 and 402 of
The shutter assemblies 200, 300, and 402 can also be made electrically bi-stable. In an electrically bi-stable shutter assembly, there exists a range of voltages below the actuation voltage of the shutter assembly, which if applied to a closed actuator (with the shutter being either open or closed), hold the actuator closed and the shutter in position, even if an opposing force is exerted on the shutter. The opposing force may be exerted by a spring attached to an opposite end of the shutter, such as spring 207 in shutter assembly 200, or the opposing force may be exerted by an opposing actuator. The minimum voltage needed to maintain a shutter's position against such an opposing force is referred to as a maintenance voltage Vm.
Electrical bi-stability arises from the fact that the electrostatic force across an actuator is a strong function of position as well as voltage. The beams of the actuators in the shutter assemblies 200, 300, and 402 act as capacitor plates. The force between capacitor plates is proportional to 1/d2 where d is the local separation distance between capacitor plates. In a closed actuator, the local separation between actuator beams is very small. Thus, the application of a small voltage can result in a relatively strong force between the actuator beams. As a result, a relatively small voltage, such as Vm, can keep the actuator closed, even if other elements exert an opposing force on the actuator.
In shutter assemblies, such as 300, that provide for two separately controllable actuators (for the purpose of opening and closing the shutter respectively), the equilibrium position of the shutter will be determined by the combined effect of the voltage differences across each of the actuators. In other words, the electrical potentials of all three terminals (the shutter open drive beam, the shutter close drive beam, and the shutter/load beams), as well as shutter position, must be considered to determine the equilibrium forces on the shutter.
For an electrically bi-stable system, a set of logic rules can describe the stable states, and can be used to develop reliable addressing or digital control schemes for the shutter. These logic rules are as follows:
Let Vs be the electrical potential on the shutter or load beam. Let Vo be the electrical potential on the shutter-open drive beam. Let Vc be the electrical potential on the shutter-close drive beam. Let the expression /Vo−Vs/ refer to the absolute value of the voltage difference between the shutter and the shutter-open drive beam. Let Vm be the maintenance voltage. Let Vat be the actuation threshold voltage, i.e., the voltage necessary to actuate an actuator absent the application of Vm to an opposing drive beam. Let Vmax be the maximum allowable potential for Vo and Vc. Let Vm<Vat<Vmax. Then, assuming Vo and Vc remain below Vmax:
Then the shutter will relax to the equilibrium position of its mechanical spring.
Then the shutter will not move, i.e. it will hold in either the open or the closed state, whichever position was established by the last actuation event.
Then the shutter will move into the open position.
Then the shutter will move into the closed position.
Following rule 1, with voltage differences on each actuator near to zero, the shutter will relax. In many shutter assemblies the mechanically relaxed position is only partially open or closed, and so this voltage condition is preferably avoided in an addressing scheme.
The condition of rule 2 makes it possible to include a global actuation function into an addressing scheme. By maintaining a shutter voltage which provides beam voltage differences that are at least the maintenance voltage, the absolute values of the shutter open and shutter closed potentials can be altered or switched in the midst of an addressing sequence over wide voltage ranges (even where voltage differences exceed Vat) with no danger of unintentional shutter motion.
The condition of rules 3 and 4 are those that are generally targeted during the addressing sequence to ensure the bi-stable actuation of the shutter.
The maintenance voltage difference, Vm, can be designed or expressed as a certain fraction of the actuation threshold voltage, Vat. For systems designed for a useful degree of bi-stability the maintenance voltage can exist in a range between 20% and 80% of Vat. This helps ensure that charge leakage or parasitic voltage fluctuations in the system do not result in a deviation of a set holding voltage out of its maintenance rang e-a deviation which could result in the unintentional actuation of a shutter. In some systems an exceptional degree of bi-stability or hysteresis can be provided, with Vm existing over a range of 2% to 98% of Vat. In these systems, however, care must be taken to ensure that an electrode voltage condition of V<Vm can be reliably obtained within the addressing and actuation time available.
Control Matrices and Methods of Operation Thereof
The control matrix 500 is fabricated as a diffused or thin-film-deposited electrical circuit on the surface of a substrate 504 on which the shutter assemblies 502 are formed. The control matrix 500 includes a scan-line interconnect 506 for each row of pixels 501 in the control matrix 500 and a data-interconnect 508 for each column of pixels 501 in the control matrix 500. Each scan-line interconnect 506 electrically connects a write-enabling voltage source 507 to the pixels 501 in a corresponding row of pixels 501. Each data interconnect 508 electrically connects an data voltage source, (“Vd source”) 509 to the pixels 501 in a corresponding column of pixels. In control matrix 500, the data voltage Vd provides the majority of the energy necessary for actuation. Thus, the data voltage source 509 also serves as an actuation voltage source.
For each pixel 501 or for each shutter assembly in the array, the control matrix 500 includes a transistor 510 and a capacitor 512. The gate of each transistor is electrically connected to the scan-line interconnect 506 of the row in the array in which the pixel 501 is located. The source of each transistor 510 is electrically connected to its corresponding data interconnect 508. The shutter assembly 502 includes an actuator with two electrodes. The two electrodes have significantly different capacitances with respect to the surroundings. The transistor connects the data interconnect 508 to the actuator electrode having the lower capacitance. More particularly the drain of each transistor 510 is electrically connected in parallel to one electrode of the corresponding capacitor 512 and to the lower capacitance electrode of the actuator. The other electrode of the capacitor 512 and the higher capacitance electrode of the actuator in shutter assembly 502 are connected to a common or ground potential. In operation, to form an image, the control matrix 500 write-enables each row in the array in sequence by applying Vwe to each scan-line interconnect 506 in turn. For a write-enabled row, the application of Vwe to the gates of the transistors 510 of the pixels 501 in the row allows the flow of current through the data interconnects 508 through the transistors to apply a potential to the actuator of the shutter assembly 502. While the row is write-enabled, data voltages Vd are selectively applied to the data interconnects 508. In implementations providing analog gray scale, the data voltage applied to each data interconnect 508 is varied in relation to the desired brightness of the pixel 501 located at the intersection of the write-enabled scan-line interconnect 506 and the data interconnect 508. In implementations providing digital control schemes, the data voltage is selected to be either a relatively low magnitude voltage (i.e., a voltage near ground) or to meet or exceed Vat (the actuation threshold voltage). In response to the application of Vat to a data interconnect 508, the actuator in the corresponding shutter assembly 502 actuates, opening the shutter in that shutter assembly 502. The voltage applied to the data interconnect 508 remains stored in the capacitor 512 of the pixel even after the control matrix 500 ceases to apply Vwe to a row. It is not necessary, therefore, to wait and hold the voltage Vwe on a row for times long enough for the shutter assembly 502 to actuate; such actuation can proceed after the write-enabling voltage has been removed from the row. The voltage in the capacitors 510 in a row remain substantially stored until an entire video frame is written, and in some implementations until new data is written to the row.
The control matrix 500 can be manufactured through use of the following sequence of processing steps:
First an aperture layer 550 is formed on a substrate 504. If the substrate 504 is opaque, such as silicon, then the substrate 504 serves as the aperture layer 550, and aperture holes 554 are formed in the substrate 504 by etching an array of holes through the substrate 504. If the substrate 504 is transparent, such as glass, then the aperture layer 550 may be formed from the deposition of a light blocking layer on the substrate 504 and etching of the light blocking layer into an array of holes. The aperture holes 554 can be generally circular, elliptical, polygonal, serpentine, or irregular in shape. As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/218,690, filed on Sep. 2, 2005, if the light blocking layer is also made of a reflective material, such as a metal, then the aperture layer 550 can act as a mirror surface which recycles non-transmitted light back into an attached backlight for increased optical efficiency. Reflective metal films appropriate for providing light recycling can be formed by a number of vapor deposition techniques including sputtering, evaporation, ion plating, laser ablation, or chemical vapor deposition. Metals that are effective for this reflective application include, without limitation, Al, Cr, Au, Ag, Cu, Ni, Ta, Ti, Nd, Nb, Si, Mo and/or alloys thereof. Thicknesses in the range of 30 nm to 1000 nm are sufficient.
Second, an intermetal dielectric layer is deposited in blanket fashion over the top of the aperture layer metal 550.
Third, a first conducting layer is deposited and patterned on the substrate. This conductive layer can be patterned into the conductive traces of the scan-line interconnect 506. Any of the metals listed above, or conducting oxides such as indium tin oxide, can have sufficiently low resistivity for this application. A portion of the scan line interconnect 506 in each pixel is positioned to so as to form the gate of a transistor 510.
Fourth, another intermetal dielectric layer is deposited in blanket fashion over the top of the first layer of conductive interconnects, including that portion that forms the gate of the transistor 510. Intermetal dielectrics sufficient for this purpose include SiO2, Si3N4, and Al2O3 with thicknesses in the range of 30 nm to 1000 nm.
Fifth, a layer of amorphous silicon is deposited on top of the intermetal dielectric and then patterned to form the source, drain and channel regions of a thin film transistor active layer. Alternatively this semiconducting material can be polycrystalline silicon.
Sixth, a second conducting layer is deposited and patterned on top of the amorphous silicon. This conductive layer can be patterned into the conductive traces of the data interconnect 508. The same metals and/or conducting oxides can be used as listed above. Portions of the second conducting layer can also be used to form contacts to the source and drain regions of the transistor 510.
Capacitor structures such as capacitor 512 can be built as plates formed in the first and second conducting layers with the intervening dielectric material.
Seventh, a passivating dielectric is deposited over the top of the second conducting layer.
Eighth, a sacrificial mechanical layer is deposited over the top of the passivation layer. Vias are opened into both the sacrificial layer and the passivation layer such that subsequent MEMS shutter layers can make electrical contact and mechanical attachment to the conducting layers below.
Ninth, a MEMS shutter layer is deposited and patterned on top of the sacrificial layer. The MEMS shutter layer is patterned with shutters 502 as well as actuators 503 and is anchored to the substrate 504 through vias that are patterned into the sacrificial layer. The pattern of the shutter 502 is aligned to the pattern of the aperture holes 554 that were formed in the first aperture layer 550. The MEMS shutter layer may be composed of a deposited metal, such as Au, Cr or Ni, or a deposited semiconductor, such as polycrystalline silicon or amorphous silicon, with thicknesses in the range of 300 nanometers to 10 microns.
Tenth, the sacrificial layer is removed such that components of the MEMS shutter layer become free to move in response to voltages that are applied across the actuators 503.
Eleventh, the sidewalls of the actuator 503 electrodes are coated with a dielectric material to prevent shorting between electrodes with opposing voltages.
Many variations on the above process are possible. For instance the reflective aperture layer 550 of step 1 can be combined into the first conducting layer. Gaps are patterned into this conducting layer to provide for electrically conductive traces within the layer, while most of the pixel area remains covered with a reflective metal. In another embodiment, the transistor 510 source and drain terminals can be placed on the first conducting layer while the gate terminals are formed in the second conducting layer. In another embodiment the semiconducting amorphous or polycrystalline silicon is placed directly below each of the first and second conducting layers. In this embodiment vias can be patterned into the intermetal dielectric so that metal contacts can be made to the underlying semiconducting layer.
In operation the MIM diode 604 acts as a non-linear switch element which prevents current from flowing to the shutter assembly 609 unless the voltage presented between the scan line interconnect 606 and the data line interconnect 607 exceeds a threshold voltage Vdiode. Therefore, if voltage pulses provided by the data line interconnect 607 do not exceed Vdiode, such data pulses will not effect that actuation of shutter assemblies 608 connected along the data line. If, however, a write-enabling voltage Vwe, is applied to a scan line interconnect 606 such that a voltage difference in excess of Vdiode appears between the scan line interconnect 606 and any of the several data line interconnects 607 that cross the scan line interconnect 606, then the shutters at the intersection of the that scan line interconnect 606 and those data line interconnects 607 will receive their charge and can be actuated. In implementations providing analog gray scale, the data voltage applied to each data interconnect 607 is varied in relation to the desired brightness of the pixel 602 located at the intersection of the write-enabled scan-line interconnect 606 and the data interconnect 607. In implementations providing a digital control schemes, the data voltage is selected to be either close to Vwe (i.e., such that little or no current flows through the diode 604) or high enough such that Vwe−Vdiode will meet or exceed Vat (the actuation threshold voltage).
In other implementations the MIM diode 604 can be placed between the shutter assembly 608 and the data line interconnect 607. The method of operation is the same as described above. In other implementations, two MIM diodes are employed, each connected to a separate and adjacent scan line. One electrode of the shutter assembly is connected to each of the MIM diodes on the side opposite of their respective scan lines such that the voltage appearing on the shutter electrode is almost ½ of the voltage difference between the two scan lines. In this fashion it is easier to fix the potential of one of the electrodes of the actuator to a known zero or common potential.
The two electrodes of the shutter assembly 608 in the pixel 602 have significantly different capacitances with respect to the ground or case potential. Of these two electrodes, the higher capacitance electrode is preferably connected to the scan line interconnect 606 (optionally, as shown, with a diode connected between shutter 608 and the scan line interconnect 606), since the scan line typically requires smaller voltage changes (with respect to ground) than are typically required of the data line interconnect 607. The data interconnect 607 electrically connects to the lower-capacitance electrode of the shutter assembly 608.
For a given pixel 702 in the control matrix 700, the pixel 702 includes two transistor-capacitor pairs, one pair for each data-interconnect 706a and 706b addressing the pixel. The gates of both transistors in the pixel 702 electrically couple to the scan-line interconnect 704 corresponding to the row of the control matrix 700 in which the pixel 702 is located. The source of one of the transistors, the shutter-open transistor 708a, electrically connects to the shutter-open data-interconnect 706a of the column in which the pixel 702 is located. The drain of the shutter-open transistor 708a electrically connects, in parallel, to one electrode of one of the capacitors, the shutter-open capacitor 710a, and to one electrode of the shutter-open actuator of the shutter assembly 703 of the pixel. The other electrode of the shutter-open capacitor 710a electrically connects to ground or to a bias interconnect set to a common voltage among the pixels 702.
Similarly, the source of the other transistor in the pixel 702, the shutter-close transistor 708b, electrically connects to the shutter-close data interconnect 706b of the column in which the pixel 702 is located. The drain of the shutter-close transistor 708b electrically connects, in parallel, to the other of the capacitors in the pixel, the shutter-close capacitor 710b, and to one of the electrodes of the shutter-close actuator of the shutter assembly 703.
Both the shutter-open actuator and the shutter-close actuator of the shutter assembly 703 include two electrodes. One electrode in each actuator has a significantly higher capacitance than the other. The drains of the shutter-open and the shutter-close transistors electrically connect to the lower-capacitance electrodes of their corresponding actuators. The ground or bias interconnect, if any, electrically connects to the higher-capacitance electrode.
The control matrix of
In the case where multiple shutters are to be actuated within each pixel, a separate pair of shutter-open data interconnects and shutter-closed data interconnects, along with associated transistors and capacitors, can be provided for each shutter within the pixel.
The control matrix 700 then writes data to each pixel 702 in the write-enabled scan line (decision block 804 to step 812). The data corresponds to the desired states of the shutter assemblies 703 in those pixels 702. For ease of understanding, the data writing process (decision block 804 to step 812) is described below in relation to a single pixel 702 in a selected column in the write-enabled scan line. At the same time data is written to this single pixel 702, the control matrix 700 also writes data in the same fashion to the remaining pixels 702 in the write-enabled scan line.
To write data to a pixel 702 at the intersection of a selected column of the control matrix 700 and the write-enabled scan line first, at decision block 804, it is determined if the shutter assembly 703 in question is to be open in the next image frame or closed. If the shutter assembly 703 is to be open, the control matrix 700 applies a data voltage, Vd, to the shutter-open interconnect 706a of the selected column (step 806). Vd is selected to raise the voltage across the electrodes of the shutter-open actuator in the shutter assembly 703 to equal or exceed the voltage necessary for actuation, Vat. At about the same time that the control matrix 700 applies Vd to the shutter-open interconnect 706a of the selected column (step 806), the control matrix 700 grounds the shutter-close interconnect 706b of the column (step 808).
If, at decision block 804, it is determined that the shutter assembly 703 is to be closed, the control matrix 700 applies the data voltage Vd to the shutter-close interconnect 706b (step 810) and grounds the shutter-open interconnect 706a of the column (step 812). Once the voltage across the electrodes of the desired actuator builds up to Vat, the actuator, if not previously in the desired position, actuates (step 814), moving the shutter in the shutter assembly 703 to the desired position.
After the data is written to the pixels 702 in the scan line in steps 806-812, the control matrix 700 grounds the scan-line interconnect 704 (step 814) and write-enables the next scan line (step 816). The process repeats until all pixels 702 in the control matrix 700 are addressed. In one implementation, before addressing the first scan line in the control matrix 700, a backlight to which the control matrix is affixed is turned off. Then, after all scan lines in the control matrix 700 have been addressed, the backlight is turned back on. Synchronizing the switching of the backlight off and on with the beginning and end of a period during which a frame is addressed improves the color purity of the resultant image since then the backlight is on only when all pixels are already set to their correct image state.
An actuation event is determined by noting the voltage differences that appear across the shutter-open actuator and the shutter closed actuator. For consistent actuation, generally one of these voltage differences will be kept close to zero, or at least below a certain maintenance voltage Vm, while the absolute value of the other voltage difference will exceed the actuation voltage. Consistent with the actuation conditions described with respect to
In some implementations, it is advantageous to periodically or occasionally reverse the sign of the voltages that appear across the actuators of shutter assembly 703 without otherwise altering the method 800 of addressing the pixels. In one case, polarity reversal can be accomplished by maintaining the common electrode of all shutters 703 at a potential close to zero while reversing the polarity of the data voltage, Vd. In another case polarity reversal can be accomplished by setting the common voltage to Vcommon, where Vcommon is equal to or greater than Vat, and then providing a voltage source such that the data voltage either alternates between Vcommon and 2*Vat or between zero and Vcommon.
Similar advantageous use of polarity reversals and the use of non-zero common voltages can be applied to the control matrices 500 and 600.
The flow chart of method 800 is drawn for the case where only digital information is written into an image frame, i.e. where the shutters are intended to be either open or closed. A similar method of image frame addressing can be employed for the provision of gray scale images built upon loading analog data through data interconnects 706a and 706b. In this case, intermediate voltages are intended to produce only partial openings of the shutters 703. The voltages applied across the shutter-open actuators will tend to move the shutters in directions opposite to the motion induced by voltages across the shutter-closed actuators. There will exist, however, pairs of complementary voltages that, when applied simultaneously across these two actuators, will result in controlled and pre-determined states of partial shutter opening.
The complementary nature of the voltages supplied to either the shutter-open interconnect 706a or the shutter-closed interconnect 706b can be used to advantage if the voltage source electronics are also designed with capability for charge recycling. Taking as an example method 800, which is designed for the loading of digital information to the image frame: voltages loaded into the interconnects at steps 806 or 810 are complementary. That is, if Vd is loaded into one of the interconnects, then the other interconnect is usually grounded. Changing the state of the shutter assembly 703 (e.g. from closed to open) is conceptually, then, a matter of transferring the charge stored on one actuator over to its opposing actuator. If the energy lost on each of these transitions is Q*Vd, where Q is the charge stored on an actuator, then considerable power savings can be derived if the stored charge is not simply dissipated as waste energy in the voltage source electronics at each transition but is instead recycled for use on the other actuator. While complete charge recycling is difficult, methods for partial recycling are available. For example, the frame addressing method 800 can provide a step where the data line interconnects 706a and 706b are shorted together within the voltage source electronics for a brief period between steps 802 and 804. For the brief period in which these interconnects are shorted they will share the stored charge, so at least a fraction of the previous charge becomes available on whichever of the data line interconnects is to be brought back into its fully charged state.
The inclusion of the global actuation interconnect 914 enables the near simultaneous actuation of pixels 902 in multiple rows of the control matrix 900. As a result, all actuators that actuate to set a given image frame (e.g., all shutters that move) can be actuated at the same time, as opposed to a row by row actuation method as described in method 800. The use of a global actuation process temporally decouples the writing of data to a pixel 902 from the actuation the shutter assembly 912 in the pixel 902.
The global actuation feature incorporated into the control matrix 900 takes advantage of the bi-stability of the shutter assemblies 912 in the control matrix 900. Actuating an electrically bi-stable shutter assembly requires that two conditions be satisfied simultaneously, that the absolute value of voltage across one electrode exceeds Vat, while the absolute value of the voltage across the other electrode is less than a maintenance voltage Vm. Thus, for control matrix 900, when a voltage in excess of Vm is applied to one actuator of a shutter assembly 912, applying Vat to the opposing shutter assembly is insufficient to cause the actuator to actuate.
For example, assume that the shutter-open actuator of an electrically bi-stable shutter assembly has a Vat of 40V. At the same time, the application of 10V maintenance voltage across the electrodes of the shutter-close actuator may keep the shutter of the shutter assembly in a closed position even when 60V is applied across the electrodes of the shutter-open actuator. If a −10V bias potential is applied between the higher-capacitance electrodes of all shutter assemblies and ground via the global common interconnect, while the ground potential is applied to one of the actuation electrodes, then a data voltage of +40V can be applied to the lower-capacitance electrodes of selected actuators in the shutter assemblies, thereby yielding a +50V potential difference across those actuators, without causing the actuators to actuate. Then, by grounding the global common interconnect, the voltage across the electrodes of the selected actuators is reduced to +40V while the voltage across the opposing actuator is removed. As +40V still equals the actuation voltage of the actuator and no maintenance voltage is keeping the opposing actuator in position, the selected actuators all move in concert. Another example is described in further detail below in relation to
The control matrix 900 then writes data to each pixel 902 in the write-enabled scan line corresponding to the desired states of those pixels in the next image frame (decision block 1004 to step 1012). The data writing process is described below in relation to a single pixel 902 in a selected column in the write-enabled scan line. At the same time that data is written to this single pixel 902, the control matrix 900 also writes data in the same fashion to the remaining pixels 902 in the write-enabled scan line.
To write data to a pixel 902, at decision block 1004, it is determined if the shutter of the shutter assembly 912 in the pixel 902 is to be in the open position in the next image frame or in the closed position. If the shutter is to be in the open position, the control matrix 900 applies a data voltage, Vd, to the shutter-open interconnect of the selected column (step 1006). Vd is selected such that before the application of a global actuation voltage, Vag, to the global common interconnect 914, the voltage across the shutter-open actuator in the pixel 902 remains insufficient to overcome the bias applied to the shutter-close actuator, but such that after the application of Vag to the global common interconnect 914, the voltage across the electrodes of the shutter-open actuator is sufficient for the shutter-open actuator to actuate. For example, if Vat equals 40V, Vm equals 20V, and Vag equals ground, then Vd is selected to be greater than or equal to 40V, but less than the potential that would overcome Vm. At the same time that the control matrix 900 applies Vd to the shutter-open interconnect 906a of the selected column (step 1006), the control matrix 900 grounds the shutter-close interconnect 906b of the column (step 1008).
If at decision block 1004, it is determined that the shutter is to be in the off position, the control matrix 900 applies the data voltage Vd to the shutter-close interconnect 906b (step 1010) and grounds the shutter-open interconnect 906a of the column (step 1012).
After the control matrix 900 writes data to the pixels 902 in the write-enabled scan line in steps 1006-1012, the control matrix 900 grounds the currently write-enabled scan-line interconnect 904 (step 1014) and write-enables the next scan line (step 1016). The process repeats until all pixels 902 in the control matrix 900 are addressed (see decision block 1015). After all pixels in the control matrix 900 are addressed (see decision block 1015), the control matrix 900 applies the global common voltage Vag to the global common interconnect (step 1018), thereby resulting in a near simultaneous global actuation of the shutter assemblies 912 in the control matrix 900. Thus, for such implementations, the global common interconnect serves as a global actuation interconnect.
As with the method 800, the method 1000 may also include the synchronization of a backlight with shutter actuation. However, by using the global actuation process described above, the backlight can be kept on for a larger percentage of the time a display is in operation, therefore yielding a brighter display for the same level of driving power in a backlight. In one embodiment, a backlight is synchronized such that it is off when ever the shutters in one row of a control matrix are set for one image frame while shutters in other rows of the control matrix are set for a different image frame. In control matrices that do not employ global actuation, for every frame of video, the backlight is turned off during the entire data writing process (approximately 500 microseconds to 5 milliseconds), as each row of pixels actuates as it is addressed. In contrast, in control matrices using global actuation, the backlight can remain on while the data writing process takes place because no pixels change state until after all the data has been written. The backlight is only turned off (if at all), during the much shorter time beginning after the last scan line is written to, and ending a sufficient time after the global actuation voltage is applied for the pixels to have changed states (approximately 10 microseconds to 500 microseconds).
An actuation event in the method 1000 is determined by noting the voltage differences that appear across the shutter-open actuator and the shutter closed actuator. Consistent with the actuation conditions described with respect to
In other implementations it is possible to apply the method 1000 of
In some implementations it is advantageous to periodically or occasionally reverse the sign of the voltages that appear across the actuators of shutter assembly 912 without otherwise altering the method 1000 of addressing the pixels. In one such case polarity reversal can be accomplished by reversing the signs of most of the potentials employed in Method 1000, with the exception of the write-enable voltage. In another cases voltages similar to those used in Method 1000 can be applied but with a complementary logic. Table 1 shows the differences between the nominal voltage assignments as described above for method 1000 and the voltages which could be applied in order to achieve polarity reversal on the electrodes of the shutter assemblies. In the first case, called Polarity Reversal Method 1, the voltages which appear across actuator electrodes are merely reversed in sign. Instead of applying Vd to the shutter-open electrode, for instance, −Vd would be applied. For the case where nMOS transistors are employed for the transistors 908a and 908b, however, a voltage shift should be employed (both gate voltages shifting down by an amount Vd). These gate voltage shifts ensure that the nMOS transistors operate correctly with the new voltages on the data interconnects.
Table 1 also shows a second method, Polarity Reversal Method 2, which allows the use of similar voltages (without having to reverse signs on any interconnect drivers), but still achieves polarity reversal across all actuators. This is accomplished by driving the global actuation interconnect to the higher voltage, Vd, instead of toward ground as in Method 1000 in order to move selected shutters. The sequence of voltage changes in Polarity Reversal Method 2 is similar to that of Method 1000, except that a complementary logic is now employed at step 1004 when assigning voltages to the actuators of each pixel. In this Method 2, if the shutter is to be closed, then the shutter-open interconnect would be brought up to the potential Vd, while the shutter-closed interconnect would be grounded. In this example, after the global actuation interconnect is brought from its maintenance potential Vm up to the actuation potential Vd, the potential across the shutter-open actuator would be near to zero (certainly less than Vm), while the potential across the shutter-closed actuator would be −Vd, sufficient to actuate the shutter to the closed position and with a polarity that is the reverse of what was applied in Method 1000. Similarly if, at step 1004, the shutter is to be opened then the shutter-closed interconnect would be brought up to the potential Vd while the shutter-open interconnect is grounded.
The control matrix 900 can alternate between the voltages used in Method 1000 and that used with the above Polarity Reversal Methods in every frame or on some other periodic basis. Over time, the net potentials applied across the actuators on shutter assemblies 1408 by the charge interconnect 1406 and the global actuation interconnect 1416 average out to about 0V.
Actuation methods, similar to method 1000, can also be applied to single-sided or elastic shutter assemblies, such as with shutter assemblies 502 in control matrix 500. Such single-sided applications will be illustrated in conjunction with
In addition to the scan-line and data-interconnects 1104 and 1106, the control matrix 1100 includes a charge interconnect 1110 (also labeled as V(at)) and a charge trigger interconnect 1112 (also labeled as C-T). The charge interconnect 11100 and the charge trigger interconnect 1112 may be shared among all pixels 1102 in the control matrix 1100, or some subset thereof. For example, each column of pixels 1100 may share a common charge interconnect 1110 and a common charge trigger interconnect 1112. The following description assumes the incorporation of a globally shared charge interconnect 1110 and a globally common charge trigger interconnect 1112.
Each pixel 1102 in the control matrix 1100 includes two transistors, a charge trigger switch transistor 1114 and a discharge switch transistor 1116. The gate of the charge trigger switch transistor 1114 is electrically connected to the charge trigger interconnect 1112 of the control matrix 1100. The drain of the charge trigger switch transistor 1114 is electrically connected to the charge interconnect 1110. The charge interconnect 1110 receives a DC voltage sufficient to actuate the actuators of the shutter assembly 1108 in each pixel 1102, absent the application of any bias voltage to the scan line interconnect 1104. The source of the charge trigger switch transistor 1114 is electrically connected to the lower capacitance electrode of the actuator in the shutter assembly 1108 in the pixel 1102 and to the drain of the discharge switch transistor 1116. The gate of the discharge switch transistor 1116 is electrically connected to the data interconnect 1106 of the column of the control matrix 1100 in which the pixel 1102 is located. The source of the discharge switch transistor 1116 is electrically connected to the scan-line interconnect 1104 of the row of the control matrix 1100 in which the pixel 1102 is located. The higher-capacitance electrode of the actuator in the shutter assembly 1108 is also electrically connected to the scan-line interconnect 1104 of row corresponding to the pixel. Alternately, the higher capacitance electrode can be connected to a separate ground or common electrode.
The control matrix 1100 then proceeds with the addressing of each pixel 1102 in the control matrix, one row at a time (steps 1208-1212). To address a particular row, the control matrix 1100 write-enables a first scan line by grounding the corresponding scan-line interconnect 1104 (step 1208). Then, at decision block 1210, the control matrix 1100 determines for each pixel 1102 in the write-enabled row whether the pixel 1102 needs to be switched out of its initial frame position. For example, if at step 1202, all shutters are opened, then at decision block 1210, it is determined whether each pixel 1102 in the write-enabled row is to be closed. If a pixel 1102 is to be closed, the control matrix 1100 applies a data voltage, for example 5V, to the data interconnect 1106 corresponding to the column in which that pixel 1102 is located (step 1212). As the scan-line interconnect 1104 for the write-enabled row is grounded (step 1208), the application of the data voltage Vd to the data interconnect 1106 of the column results in a potential difference between the gate and the source of the discharge switch transistor 1116 of the correct sign and magnitude to open the channel of the transistor 1116. Once the channel of transistor 1116 is opened the charge stored in the shutter assembly actuator can be discharged to ground through the scan line interconnect 1104. As the voltage stored in the actuator of the shutter assembly 1108 dissipates, the restoring force or spring in the shutter assembly 1108 forces the shutter into its relaxed position, closing the shutter. If at decision block 1210, it is determined that no state change is necessary for a pixel 1102, the corresponding data interconnect 1106 is grounded. Although the relaxed position in this example is defined as the shutter-closed position, alternative shutter assemblies can be provided in which the relaxed state is a shutter-open position. In these alternative cases, the application of data voltage Vd, at step 1212, would result in the opening of the shutter.
In other implementations it is possible to apply the method 1200 of
As described above, to address the pixels 1102 in the control matrix 1100, the data voltage Vd can be significantly less than the actuation voltage Vat (e.g., 5V vs. 40V). Since the actuation voltage Vat is applied once a frame, whereas the data voltage Vd may be applied to each data interconnect 1106 as may times per frame as there are rows in the control matrix 1100, control matrices such as control matrix 1100 may save a substantial amount of power in comparison to control matrices which require a data voltage to be high enough to also serve as the actuation voltage.
For pixels 1102 in non-write-enabled rows, the bias voltage Vb applied to their corresponding scan-line interconnects 1104 keeps the potential at their discharge transistor 1116 sources greater than the potentials at their discharge transistor 1116 gate terminals, even when a data voltage Vd is applied to the data interconnect 1106 of their corresponding columns. It will be understood that the embodiment of
In other embodiments the discharge switch transistor 1116 can be replaced by a set of two or more transistors, for instance if the control matrix 1100 were to be built using standard CMOS technology the discharge switch transistor could be comprised of a complementary pair of nMOS and pMOS transistors.
The method 1200 assumes digital information is written into an image frame, i.e. where the shutters are intended to be either open or closed. Using the circuit of control matrix 1100, however, it is also possible to write analog information into the shutter assemblies 1108. In this case, the grounding of the scan line interconnects is provided for only a short and fixed amount of time and only partial voltages are applied through the data line interconnects 1106. The application of partial voltages to the discharge switch transistor 1116, when operated in a linear amplification mode, allows for only the partial discharge of the electrode of the shutter assembly 1108 and therefore a partial opening of the shutter.
The control matrix 1100 selectively applies the data voltage to the remaining columns of the control matrix 1100 at the same time. After all pixels have achieved their intended states (step 1214), the control matrix 1100 reapplies Vb to the selected scan-line interconnect and selects a subsequent scan-line interconnect (step 1216). After all scan-lines have been addressed, the process begins again. As with the previously described control matrices, the activity of an attached backlight can be synchronized with the addressing of each frame.
The control matrix 1300 includes a actuation voltage source electrically connected to the charge interconnect 1310. The actuation voltage source supplies pulses of voltage at the beginning of each frame addressing cycle, allowing current to flow into the shutter assemblies 1314 of the pixels 1302 in the control matrix 1300 and thereby actuating any unactuated actuators in the shutter assemblies 1314. As a result, after the voltage pulse, all of the pixels 1302 in the control matrix 1300 are in the same state, open or closed. After the voltage pulse, when the potential of the charge interconnect 1310 has been reset to zero, the charge diode 1304 prevents the voltage stored in the shutter assemblies 1314 to be dissipated via the charge interconnect 1310. The control matrix 1300 can be controlled using a method similar to the pixel addressing method 1200. Instead of applying a voltage to the charge trigger interconnect 1112 at step 1202, the actuation voltage source supplies a voltage pulse having a duration and magnitude sufficient to open any closed shutter assemblies.
It is preferable that the higher-capacitance electrode of shutter assemblies 1108 and 1314 be connected to the scan line interconnects 1104 and 1308, while the lower-capacitance electrode be connected through transistor 1114 or through diode 1304 to the charge interconnects 1112 or 1310. The voltage changes driven onto the shutter electrodes through the charge interconnects will generally be higher in magnitude than those experienced through the scan line interconnects.
The global actuation interconnect, if used in a mode similar to polarity reversal method 2 of Table 1, may be employed to ensure a 0V DC average mode of operation in addition to providing an actuation threshold voltage. To achieve 0V DC averaging, the control matrix alternates between control logics. In the first control logic, similar to that employed in the pixel addressing method 1000 and 1200, at the beginning of a frame addressing cycle, the control matrix 1400 opens the shutter assemblies 1412 of all pixels in the control matrix 1400 by storing Vat across the electrodes of the shutter assembly 1412 actuator. The control matrix 1400 then applies a bias voltage to lock the shutter assemblies 1412 in the open state. Control matrix 1400 applies a bias voltage, e.g., ¼ Vat, which is greater than Vm, via the global actuation interconnect 1416. Then, to change the state of a shutter assembly 1412, when the row of pixels 1408 in which the shutter assembly 1412 is located is write-enabled, the control matrix 1400 discharges the stored Vat in the shutter assembly 1412. The maintenance voltage keeps the shutter assembly 1412 open until the global actuation interconnect 1416 is grounded.
In the second control logic, which is similar to the polarity reversal method 2 of Table 1, instead of the control matrix changing the voltage applied to the global actuation interconnect 1416 from ½ Vat to ground, the control matrix changes the voltage applied to the global actuation interconnect 1416 from ½ Vat to Vat. Thus, to release a shutter in a shutter assembly 1412 to its relaxed state, the voltage applied via the charge diode 1410 must be maintained, as opposed to discharged. Therefore, in the second control logic, the control matrix 1400 discharges the stored Vat from shutter assemblies that are to remain open, as opposed to those that are closed. The control matrix 1400 can alternate between the control logics every frame or on some other periodic basis. Over time, the net potentials applied across the actuators of the shutter assemblies 1408 by the charge interconnect 1406 and the global actuation interconnect 1416 average out to 0V.
Each pixel 1504 of control matrix 1500, also includes a third transistor, a write-enable transistor 1518, and a data store capacitor 1520. The scan-line interconnect 1506 for a row of pixels 1504 connects to the gates of the write-enable transistor 1518 incorporated into each pixel 1504 in the row. The data interconnects 1502 for the columns of the control matrix 1500 electrically connect to the source terminals of the write-enable transistors 1518 of the pixels 1504 in the column. The drain of the write-enable transistors 1518 in each pixel 1504 electrically connect in parallel to the data store capacitor 1520 and the gate terminal of the discharge trigger transistor 1514 of the respective pixels 1504.
The operation of the control matrix 1500 includes elements in common with each of the methods 1000 and 1200. At the beginning of an frame addressing cycle, a voltage is applied to the charge trigger interconnect 1508 and the charge interconnect 1510 of the control matrix 1500 to build up a potential, Vat, on one shutter assembly 1511 actuator electrode of each pixel 1504 in the control matrix 1500 to open any closed shutter assemblies 1511. These steps are similar to those performed in steps 1202 and 1204 of
If the voltage stored on the data store capacitor 1520 of a pixel 1504 is sufficiently greater than ground, e.g., 5V, the discharge switch transistor 1514 is activated, allowing the charge applied to the corresponding shutter assembly 1511 via the charge trigger switch transistor 1514 to discharge. The discharge of the larger voltage, Vat, stored in the shutter assembly 1511, however, can take more time than is needed to store the relatively small data voltage on the data store capacitor 1520. By storing the data voltage on the data store capacitor 1520, the discharge and the mechanical actuation process can continue even after the control matrix 1500 grounds the scan-line interconnect 1506, thereby isolating the charge stored on the capacitor 1520 from its corresponding data interconnect 1502. In contrast to the discharge process presented by the control matrices in
In alternative implementations, the storage capacitor 1520 and write-enable transistor 1518 can be replaced with alternative data memory circuits, such as a DRAM or SRAM circuits known in the art.
In contrast to the circuits shown in
The control matrix 1500 also includes the capability for global actuation, the process or method of which is similar to that described in
In operation the control matrix 1600 performs the same functions as those of control matrix 1500, but by different means or methods. Most particularly, the method for accomplishing global actuation in control matrix 1600 is unique from that performed in control matrices 900, 1400, or 1500. In the previous methods, the global actuation interconnect was connected to one electrode of the shutter assembly, and applying a maintenance voltage Vm to it prevented shutter actuation. In control matrix 1600, however, the global actuation interconnect 1612 is connected to the source of the discharge switch transistor 1617. Maintaining the global actuation interconnect 1612 at a potential significantly above that of the shutter common interconnect 1622 prevents the turn-on of any of the discharge switch transistors 1617, regardless of what charge is stored on capacitor 1620. Global actuation in control matrix 1600 is achieved by bringing the potential on the global actuation interconnect 1612 to the same potential as the shutter common interconnect 1622, making it possible for those discharge switch transistors 1617s to turn-on in accordance to the whether a data voltage has been stored on capacitor 1620 or not. Control matrix 1600, therefore, does not depend on electrical bi-stability in the shutter assembly 1614 in order to achieve global actuation.
Applying partial voltages to the data store capacitor 1620 allows partial turn-on of the discharge switch transistor 1617 during the time that the global actuation interconnect 1612 is brought to its actuation potential. In this fashion, an analog voltage is created on the shutter assembly 1614, for providing analog gray scale.
In the control matrix 1600, in contrast to control matrix 1500, the higher-capacitance electrode of the actuators in the shutter assemblies 1614 electrically connect to the shutter common interconnect 1622, instead of the global actuation interconnect 1612. In operation, the control matrix alternates between two control logics as described in relation to control matrix 1400 of
As in the control matrix 1300 of
Control matrix 1700 includes one scan-line interconnect 1706 for each row of pixels 1702 in the control matrix 1700 and one data interconnect 1708 for each column of pixels 1702 in the control matrix 1700. The control matrix 1700 also includes a charge interconnect 1710, a charge trigger interconnect 1712, and a discharge trigger interconnect 1714. These interconnects 1710, 1712, and 1714 are shared amongst all or a subset of the pixels 1702 in the control matrix 1700. Each pixel 1702 in the control matrix 1700 includes four transistors, a charge trigger transistor 1716, a grayscale transistor 1718, a discharge transistor 1720, and a write-enable transistor 1722. The gate of the charge trigger transistor 1716 electrically connects to the charge trigger interconnect 1712. Its drain electrically connects to the charge interconnect 1710, and its source electrically connects to the grayscale transistor 1718. The gate of the grayscale transistor 1718 electrically connects, in parallel, to a data store capacitor 1724 and the write-enable transistor 1722. The source of the grayscale transistor 1718 electrically connects to the discharge transistor 1720. The gate of the discharge transistor 1720 electrically connects to the discharge interconnect 1714, and its source is grounded. Referring back to the write-enabling transistor 1722, its gate electrically connects to its corresponding scan-line interconnect 1706, and its drain electrically connects to its corresponding data interconnect 1708.
The control matrix 1700 can be utilized to provide analog gray scale to the display apparatus 100. In operation, at the beginning of a frame addressing cycle, the control matrix 1700 applies a voltage to the discharge trigger interconnect 1714, turning on the discharge transistor 1720. Any voltage stored in the actuators of the shutter assemblies 1704 in the pixels 1702 is discharged, releasing the shutters in the shutter assemblies 1704 to their rest positions.
The control matrix 1700 then grounds the discharge trigger interconnect 1714. Subsequently, the control matrix 1700, in sequence applies a write-enabling voltage Vwe to each scan-line interconnect 1706, turning on the write-enabling transistors 1722 of the pixels 1702 in each corresponding row of the control matrix 1700. As the write-enabling transistor 1722 for a given row is turned on, the control matrix 1700 applies voltage pulses to each of the data-interconnects 1708 to indicate the desired brightness of each pixel 1702 in the write-enabled row of pixels 1702. After the addressing sequence is complete, the control matrix then applies a voltage to the charge trigger interconnect 1712 which turns on the charge trigger transistor 1716 so that all electrodes can be charged and all pixels actuated simultaneously.
Brightness of a pixel 1702 is determined by the duration or the magnitude of the voltage pulse applied to its corresponding data interconnect 1708. While the voltage pulse is applied to the data interconnect 1708 of the pixel, current flows through the write-enabling transistor 1722, building up a potential on the data store capacitor 1724. The voltage on the capacitor 1724 is used to control the opening of the conducting channel in the grayscale transistor 1718. This channel remains open so long as the gate-to-source voltage exceeds a certain threshold voltage. Eventually, during the charging cycle, the potential on the electrode of shutter assembly 1704 will rise to match the potential stored on the capacitor 1724, at which point the grayscale transistor will turn off. In this fashion the actuation voltage stored on the shutter assembly can be made to vary in proportion to the analog voltage stored on capacitor 1724. The resulting electrode voltage causes an incremental displacement of the shutter in the shutter assembly 1704 proportional to the resultant voltage. The shutter remains displaced from its rest position until the discharge trigger interconnect 1714 is powered again at the end of the frame addressing cycle.
As in the control matrix 1300 of
The control matrix 1800 includes a scan-line interconnect 1806 for each row of pixels 1802 in the control matrix 1800. The control matrix 1800 also includes two data interconnects, a shutter-open interconnect 1808a and a shutter-close interconnect 1808b, for each column of pixels 1802 in the control matrix 1800. The control matrix 1800 further includes a charge interconnect 1810, a charge trigger interconnect 1812, and a global actuation interconnect 1814. These interconnects 1810, 1812, and 1814 are shared among pixels 1802 in multiple rows and multiple columns in the array. In one implementation (the one described in more detail below), the interconnects 1810, 1812, and 1814 are shared among all pixels 1802 in the control matrix 1800.
Each pixel 1802 in the control matrix includes a shutter-open charge transistor 1816, a shutter-open discharge transistor 1818, a shutter-close charge transistor 1820, and a shutter-close discharge transistor 1822. The control matrix also incorporates two voltage stabilizing capacitors 1824, which are connected, one each, in parallel with the source and drain of the discharge transistors 1818 and 1822. At the beginning of each frame addressing cycle, the control matrix 1800 applies a maintenance voltage, Vm, e.g., ½ the voltage needed to actuate the shutter assemblies, Vat, to the global actuation interconnect 1814. The maintenance voltage locks the shutter assemblies 1804 into their current states until a global actuation is initiated at the end of the frame addressing cycle. The control matrix 1800 then applies a voltage to the charge trigger interconnect 1812, turning on the shutter-open and shutter-close transistors 1816 and 1820 of the pixels 1802 in the control matrix 1800. The charge interconnect 1810, in one implementation, carries a DC voltage equal to or greater than Vat, e.g., 40V.
As each row of pixels 1802 in the control matrix 1800 is addressed, the control matrix 1800 write-enables a row of pixels 1802 by grounding its corresponding scan-line interconnect 1806. The control matrix 1800 then applies a data voltage, Vd, e.g., 5V, to either the shutter-open interconnect 1808a or the shutter-close interconnect 1808b corresponding to each column of pixels 1802 in the control matrix 1800. If Vd is applied to the shutter-closed interconnect 1808b of a column, the voltage stored on the shutter-close actuator of the corresponding shutter assembly 1804 is discharged via the shutter-close discharge transistor 1822. Similarly if Vd is applied to the shutter-open interconnect 1808a of a column, the voltage stored on the shutter-open actuator of the corresponding shutter assembly 1804 is discharged via the shutter-open discharge transistor 1818. Generally, to ensure proper actuation, only one of the actuators, either the shutter-closed actuator or the shutter-open actuator, is allowed to be discharged for any given shutter assembly in the array.
After all rows of pixels 1802 are addressed, the control matrix 1800 globally actuates the pixels 1802 by changing the potential on the global actuation interconnect 1814 from Vm to ground. The change in voltage releases the actuators from their locked in state to switch to their next state, if needed. If the global actuation interconnect were to be replaced with a constant voltage ground or common interconnect, i.e. if the global actuation method is not utilized with the control matrix 1800, then the voltage stabilizing capacitors 1824 may not be necessary.
As in the control matrix 1400 of
Alternatively, it is possible to take advantage of the bi-stable nature of shutter assembly 1804 and substitute a resistor for both the shutter-open charge transistor 1816 and the shutter-close charge transistor 1820. When operated with a resistor, one relies on the fact that the RC charging time constant associated with the resistor and the capacitance of the actuator in the shutter assembly 1804 can be much greater in magnitude than the time necessary for discharging the actuator through either the shutter-open discharge transistor 1818 or the shutter-close discharge transistor 1822. In the time interval between when the actuator of the shutter assembly 1804 is discharged through one of the discharge transistors and when the actuator is re-charged through the resistor and the charge interconnect 1810, the correct voltage differences can be established across the actuators of the shutter assembly 1804 and the shutter assembly can be caused to actuate. After each of the open and closed actuators of the shutter assembly 1804 have been re-charged through the resistor, the shutter assembly 1804 will not re-actuate since either or both of the actuators now effectively holds the appropriate maintenance voltage, i.e, a voltage greater than Vm.
The control matrix 1900 includes a scan-line interconnect 1906 for each row of pixels 1902 in the control matrix 1900. The control matrix 1900 also includes two data interconnects, a shutter-open interconnect 1908a and a shutter-close interconnect 1908b, for each column of pixels 1902 in the control matrix 1900. The control matrix 1900 further includes a charge interconnect 1910, a charge trigger interconnect 1912, and a global actuation interconnect 1914, and a shutter common interconnect 1915. These interconnects 1910, 1912, 1914 and 1915 are shared among pixels 1902 in multiple rows and multiple columns in the array. In one implementation (the one described in more detail below), the interconnects 1910, 1912, 1914 and 1915 are shared among all pixels 1902 in the control matrix 1900.
Each pixel 1902 in the control matrix includes a shutter-open charge transistor 1916, a shutter-open discharge transistor 1918, a shutter-open write-enable transistor 1917, and a data store capacitor 1919 as described in
At the beginning of each frame addressing cycle the control matrix 1900 applies a voltage to the charge trigger interconnect 1912, turning on the shutter-open and shutter-close transistors 1916 and 1920 of the pixels 1902 in the control matrix 1900. The charge interconnect 1910, in one implementation, carries a DC voltage equal to or greater than Vat, e.g., 40V.
Each row is then write-enabled in sequence, as was described with respect to control matrix 1500 of
In control matrix 1900 the global actuation interconnect 1914 is connected to the source of the both the shutter-open discharge switch transistor 1918 and the shutter-close discharge transistor 1922. Maintaining the global actuation interconnect 1914 at a potential significantly above that of the shutter common interconnect 1915 prevents the turn-on of any of the discharge switch transistors 1918 or 1922, regardless of what charge is stored on the capacitors 1919 and 1929. Global actuation in control matrix 1900 is achieved by bringing the potential on the global actuation interconnect 1914 to the same potential as the shutter common interconnect 1915, making it possible for the discharge switch transistors 1918 or 1922 to turn-on in accordance to the whether a data voltage has been stored on ether capacitor 1919 or 1920. Control matrix 1900, therefore, does not depend on electrical bi-stability in the shutter assembly 1904 in order to achieve global actuation.
Applying partial voltages to the data store capacitors 1919 and 1921 allows partial turn-on of the discharge switch transistors 1918 and 1922 during the time that the global actuation interconnect 1914 is brought to its actuation potential. In this fashion, an analog voltage is created on the shutter assembly 1904, for providing analog gray scale.
In operation, the control matrix alternates between two control logics as described in relation to control matrix 1600 of
As in the control matrix 1300 of
Generally speaking any of the control matrices 1100, 1300, 1400, 1500, or 1700, which were illustrated through the use of single-actuated or elastic shutter assemblies, can be adapted advantageously for use with a dual-actuated shutter assemblies such as 1904 by reproducing the control circuit in mirror fashion for each of the open and closed actuators. As shown in method 800 of
In alternative implementations, the control matrix keeps track of the prior position of each pixel and only applies positions to the data interconnects corresponding to a pixel if the state of the pixel for the next image frame is different than the prior position. In another alternative embodiment, the pixels include mechanically bi-stable shutter assemblies instead of just electrically bi-stable shutter assemblies. In such an embodiment, the charge trigger transistors can be replaced with resistors and the charge trigger interconnect can be omitted from the control matrix, as described above in relation to
Gray Scale Techniques
Field Sequential Color
The display apparatus 100 provides high-quality video images using relatively low power. The optical throughput efficiency of a shutter-based light valve can be an order of magnitude higher than afforded by liquid crystal displays, because there is no need for polarizers or color filters in the production of the image. As described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/218,690, filed on Sep. 2, 2005, a regenerative light guide can be designed which allows for 75% of the light produced in a backlight to be made available to a viewer.
Without the use of color filters, one method for producing video images in a shutter-based display is the use of field-sequential color. Color filters reduce the optical efficiency by >60% through absorption in the filters. Displays utilizing field sequential color instead use a backlight which produces pure red, green and blue light in an ordered sequence. A separate image is generated for each color. When the separate color images are alternated at frequencies in excess of 50 Hz, the human eye averages the images to produce the perception of a single image with a broad and continuous range of colors. Efficient backlights can now be produced that allow fast switching between pure colors from either light-emitting diode (LED) sources or electro-luminescent sources.
The control matrices illustrated in
Formation of accurate images with field-sequential color can be improved by synchronization between the backlight and the pixel addressing process, especially since it requires a finite period of time to switch or reset each pixel between the required states of each color sub-frame. Depending on the control matrix used to address and actuate the pixels, if the option of global actuation is not employed, then the image controller may need to pause at each row or scan line of the display long enough for the mechanical switching or actuation to complete in each row. If the backlight were to broadly illuminate the whole display in a single color while the display controller was switching states, row by row, between 2 color images, then the resulting contrast would be confused.
Consider two examples illustrating the blanking times that can be employed with the backlight during resetting of an image between colors in a synchronized display. If the shutters require 20 microseconds to actuate or move between open and closed states, if the shutters are actuated in a row-by-row fashion, and if there are 100 rows, then it would require 2 milliseconds to complete the addressing. The synchronized backlight might then be turned-off during those 2 milliseconds. Note that if the display runs at a 60 Hz frame rate with 3 colors per frame, then there is only 5.6 msec allowed per color sub-frame and, in this example, the backlight would be off 36% of the time.
Alternately, when using a global actuation scheme for switching between color sub-frames, the same resetting of the image would require only 20 microseconds for the simultaneous movement of all shutters between images. The requirements for shutter speed are now substantially relaxed. If, during the color reset, the backlight were to be off for as much as 100 microseconds, the percentage of illumination time at 60 Hz frame rate is now better than 98%. Assuming a 100 microsecond image refresh time, it is now possible to increase the frame rate to 120 Hz with no substantial loss in illumination time. Using a frame rate of 120 Hz substantially reduces image artifacts induced by field sequential color, such as color breakup in fast moving video images.
Gray Scale
The number of unique colors available in the display is dependant in part on the levels of gray scale that are available within each of the three color images. Four principle methods of producing gray scale and combinations thereof are applicable to the transverse shutter displays.
Analog Gray Scale
The first method of producing gray scale is an analog method, by which the shutters are caused to only partially obstruct an aperture in proportion to the application of a partial actuation voltage. Transverse shutters can be designed such that the percent of transmitted light is proportional to an actuation voltage, for instance through control of the shape of the actuation electrodes as described above in relation to
For analog gray scale, the display apparatus is equipped with a digital to analog converter such that the voltage delivered to the pixels is proportional to the intended gray scale level. The proportional voltage on each actuator is maintained throughout the period of an image frame such that the proportional shutter position is maintained throughout the illumination period. The optional use of a capacitor placed in parallel with the actuators in
The analog gray scale has the advantage of requiring only 1 shutter in motion per pixel and the setting of only 1 image frame during the period of each color illumination. The data rates and addressing speeds for analog gray scale are therefore the least demanding amongst all alternative methods of gray scale.
Time Division Gray Scale
With proper design of the transverse shutter, a low voltage switching can be achieved which is fast. Transversely driven shutter assemblies, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/251,035, can be built having actuation times in the range of 3 microseconds to 100 microseconds. Such rapid actuation makes possible the implementation of time division gray scale, wherein the contrast is achieved by controlling the relative on-times or duty cycles of the actuated shutters. A time division gray scale can be implemented using digital gray scale coding, in that control matrices incorporating bi-stable shutter assemblies recognize two states of shutter actuation, on or off. Gray scale is achieved by controlling the length of time a shutter is open.
The switching times can be appreciated by assuming the case of a 60 Hz frame rate with field sequential color. Each color sub-frame is allotted 5.6 msec. If the available time interval were to be divided into 63 segments (6-bit gray scale per color), then the smallest increment of on-time for each image, known as the least significant bit time (LSB), would be 88 microseconds. If an image for the LSB time-bit were to be constructed and displayed using a global actuation scheme, then the actuation of all shutters would need to be completed in significantly less than the 88 microsecond LSB time. If the display is addressed in a row-by-row basis then the time available for reset at each row is considerably less. For a display with 100 rows, the available actuation time can be less than 0.5 microseconds per row. A number of controller algorithms are possible for relaxing the time intervals required for addressing shutters in a row-by-row scheme (see for example N. A. Clark et. al., Ferroelectrics, v.46, p. 97 (2000).), but in any case the time required for shutter actuation in the 6-bit gray scale example is considerably less than 20 microseconds.
Achieving multiple bits of gray scale through the use of time division multiplexing requires significant power in the addressing circuitry, since the energy lost in the actuation cycle is ½ CV2 for each pixel through each refresh or addressing cycle in the control scheme (C is the capacitance of the pixel plus control electrodes and V is the actuation voltage). The circuit diagrams of FIGS. 11 and 13-19 reduce power requirements by decoupling and reducing the addressing voltages (the voltages required on the scan lines and data lines) from the actuation voltages (the voltages required to move a shutter).
Area Division Gray Scale
Another method that can reduce the addressing speed and power requirements of the time division gray scale is to allow for multiple shutters and actuators per pixel. A 6 bit binary time-division scheme (63 required time slots) can be reduced to a 5 bit time scheme (31 required time slots) by adding the availability of an additional gray scale bit in the spatial or area domain. The additional spatial bit can be accomplished with 2 shutters and apertures per pixel, especially if the shutters/apertures have unequal area. Similarly, if 4 shutters (with unequal areas) are available per pixel then the number of required time bits can be reduced to 3 with the result still being an effective 64 levels of gray scale per color.
Illumination Gray Scale
Another method that can relax the speed and/or real estate requirements for the above gray scale techniques is use of an illumination gray scale. The contrast achieved through the illumination of the color image can be adjusted or given finer gray levels by means of altered intensity from the backlight. If the backlight is capable of fast response (as in the case of LED backlights), then contrast can be achieved by either altering the brightness of the backlight or the duration of its illumination.
Let us consider one example, wherein it is assumed that the control matrix utilizes a global actuation scheme and that time division gray scale is accomplished through construction and display of distinct time-bit images illuminated for differing lengths of time. Take for example a 4-bit binary time coding scheme accomplished by dividing the color frame into 15 time slots. The image that is constructed for the shortest (LSB) time should be held for 1/15 of the available frame time. In order to expand to a 5-bit coding scheme one could, in the time domain, divide the color frame into 31 time slots, requiring twice the addressing speed. Alternately, one could assign only 16 time slots and assign to one of these time slots an image that is illuminated at only ½ the brightness or by a backlight that is flashed for an on period of only 1/31 of the frame time. As many as 3 additional bits of gray scale can be added on top of a 4 bit time-division coding scheme by adding these short time-duration images accompanied by partial illumination. If the partial illumination bits are assigned to the smallest of the time slices, then a negligible loss of average projected brightness will result.
Hybrid Gray Scale Schemes
The four principle means of gray scale are analog gray scale, time division gray scale, area division gray scale, and illumination gray scale. It should be understood that useful control schemes can be constructed by combinations of any of the above methods, for instance by combining the use of time division, area division and the use of partial illumination. Further divisions of gray scale are also available through interpolation techniques, also known as dither. Time domain dither includes the insertion of LSB time bits only in an alternating series of color frames. Spatial domain dither, also known as half-toning, involves the control or opening of a specified fraction of neighboring pixels to produce localized areas with only partial brightness.
The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The forgoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative, rather than limiting of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/326,900 filed Jan. 6, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/251,035 filed Oct. 14, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/655,827, filed Feb. 23, 2005, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/676,053, filed Apr. 29. 2005. The contents of each of these applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4067043 | Perry | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4074253 | Nadir | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4421381 | Ueda et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4559535 | Watkins et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4563836 | Woodruff et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4564836 | Vuilleumier et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4582396 | Bos et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4673253 | Tanabe et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4728936 | Guscott et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4744640 | Phillips | May 1988 | A |
| 4889603 | DiSanto et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4958911 | Beiswenger et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4991941 | Kalmanash | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5005108 | Pristash et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5025346 | Tang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025356 | Gawad | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5042900 | Parker | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5044734 | Sperl et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5050946 | Hathaway et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5061049 | Hornbeck | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062689 | Koehler | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5078479 | Vuilleumier | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5093652 | Bull et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5096279 | Hornbeck et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5128787 | Blonder | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5136480 | Pristash et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5136751 | Coyne et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142405 | Hornbeck | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5184248 | De Vaan et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5184428 | Feldt et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5198730 | Vancil | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5202950 | Arego et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5233385 | Sampsell | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5233459 | Bozler et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5245454 | Blonder | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5266612 | Kim et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5278652 | Urbanus et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5280277 | Hornbeck | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5319061 | Ramaswamy | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5319491 | Selbrede | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5339116 | Urbanus et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5339179 | Rudisill et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5359345 | Hunter | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5379135 | Nakagaki et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5396350 | Beeson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5416631 | Yagi | May 1995 | A |
| 5440197 | Gleckman | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5452024 | Sampsell | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5461411 | Florence et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465175 | Woodgate et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467104 | Furness, III et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5477086 | Rostoker et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5479279 | Barbier et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5491347 | Allen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5493439 | Engle | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5497172 | Doherty et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5497258 | Ju et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499127 | Tsubota et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504389 | Dickey | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5504614 | Webb et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510824 | Nelson | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5517341 | Kim et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5517347 | Sampsell | May 1996 | A |
| 5519565 | Kalt et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5523803 | Urbanus et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5526051 | Gove et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5528262 | McDowall et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5548301 | Kornher et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548670 | Koike | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552925 | Worley | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559389 | Spindt et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5568964 | Parker et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5578185 | Bergeron et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579035 | Beiswenger | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5579240 | Buus | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5591049 | Dohnishi | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596339 | Furness, III et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596369 | Chau | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5613751 | Parker et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618096 | Parker et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5619266 | Tomita et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5622612 | Mihara et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629784 | Abileah et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5629787 | Tsubota et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5655832 | Pelka et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5655838 | Ridley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659327 | Furness, III et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663917 | Oka et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5666226 | Ezra et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677749 | Tsubota et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684354 | Gleckman | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5687465 | Hinata et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5691695 | Lahiff | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5694227 | Starkweather | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5724062 | Hunter | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5731802 | Aras et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5745193 | Urbanus et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745203 | Valliath et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745281 | Yi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745284 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5771321 | Stern | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5781331 | Carr et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781333 | Lanzillotta et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784189 | Bozler et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5794761 | Renaud et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5801792 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5808800 | Handschy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5810469 | Weinreich | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835255 | Miles | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835256 | Huibers | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5854872 | Tai | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867302 | Fleming | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876107 | Parker et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884872 | Greenhalgh | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889625 | Chen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5894686 | Parker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895115 | Parker et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5917692 | Schmitz et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5921652 | Parker et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5936596 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943223 | Pond | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5953469 | Zhou | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5975711 | Parker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986628 | Tuenge et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986796 | Miles | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5986828 | Wood et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5990990 | Crabtree | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995688 | Aksyuk et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6008781 | Furness, III et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6008929 | Akimoto et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6028656 | Buhrer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030089 | Parker et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034807 | Little et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040796 | Matsugatani et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040937 | Miles | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046840 | Huibers | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049317 | Thompson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055090 | Miles | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6069676 | Yuyama | May 2000 | A |
| 6079838 | Parker et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6111560 | May | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6130735 | Hatanaka et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6137313 | Wong et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6154586 | MacDonald et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6158867 | Parker et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6162657 | Schiele et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168395 | Quenzer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172657 | Kamakura et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6172797 | Huibers | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174064 | Kalantar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6195196 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201633 | Peeters et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6201664 | Le et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6206550 | Fukushima et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6219119 | Nakai | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6225991 | McKnight | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6227677 | Willis | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6249169 | Okada | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249269 | Blalock et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6249370 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6266240 | Urban et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6282951 | Loga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6285270 | Lane et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288824 | Kastalsky | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6288829 | Kimura | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6295054 | McKnight | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6296383 | Henningsen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6296838 | Bindra et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6300154 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
| 6300294 | Robbins et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317103 | Furness, III et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6323834 | Colgan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6329967 | Little et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6329974 | Walker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6367940 | Parker et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6388661 | Richards | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6392736 | Furukawa et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6402335 | Kalantar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6402355 | Kinouchi | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6404942 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6407851 | Islam et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6411423 | Ham | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6424329 | Okita | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6429625 | LeFevre et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6429628 | Nakagawa | Aug 2002 | B2 |
| 6459467 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471879 | Hanson et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6473220 | Clikeman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6476886 | Krusius et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6483613 | Woodgate et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6498685 | Johnson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6504985 | Parker et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6507138 | Rodgers et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6508563 | Parker et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6514111 | Ebihara et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6523961 | Ilkov et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6529250 | Murakami et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6529265 | Henningsen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6531329 | Asakura et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6531947 | Weaver et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6532044 | Conner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535256 | Ishihara et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535311 | Lindquist | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6556258 | Yoshida et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6556261 | Krusius et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6559827 | Mangerson | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567063 | Okita | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6567138 | Krusius et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6574033 | Chui et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6576887 | Whitney et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582095 | Toyoda | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6583915 | Hong et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6589625 | Kothari et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591049 | Williams et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6593677 | Behin et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6600474 | Heines et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6626540 | Ouchi et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6633301 | Dallas et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6639570 | Furness, III et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6639572 | Little et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6650455 | Miles | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650822 | Zhou | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6664779 | Lopes et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666561 | Blakley | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6671078 | Flanders et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6674562 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6677709 | Ma et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6677936 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6678029 | Suzuki | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6680792 | Miles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6687896 | Royce et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6690422 | Daly et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697035 | Sugahara et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6698349 | Komata | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6701039 | Bourgeois et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6707176 | Rodgers | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710008 | Chang et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6710538 | Ahn et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6710908 | Miles et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6710920 | Mashitani et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712071 | Parker | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712481 | Parker et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6731355 | Miyashita | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6731492 | Goodwin-Johansson | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6733354 | Cathey et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6738177 | Gutierrez et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741377 | Miles | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6746886 | Duncan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6749312 | Parker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6750930 | Yoshii et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6752505 | Parker et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6755534 | Veligdan et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6755547 | Parker | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6760081 | Takagi | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6760505 | Street et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6762743 | Yoshihara et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6762868 | Liu et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6764796 | Fries | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6774964 | Funamoto et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6775048 | Starkweather et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6778228 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6778248 | Ootaguro et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785454 | Abe | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6787969 | Grade et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6788371 | Tanada et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6794119 | Miles | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6795064 | Walker et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796668 | Parker et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798935 | Bourgeois et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800996 | Nagai et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6809851 | Gurcan | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6819386 | Roosendaal et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6819465 | Clikeman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822734 | Eidelman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6825470 | Bawolek et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6825499 | Nakajima et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6827456 | Parker et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6831678 | Travis | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6835111 | Ahn et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6844959 | Huibers et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846082 | Glent-Madsen et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6846089 | Stevenson et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6847425 | Tanada et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6847428 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6852095 | Ray | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6857751 | Penn et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6859625 | Sawada | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6862072 | Liu et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6863219 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6864618 | Miller et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6867192 | Armour et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6867896 | Miles | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6873311 | Yoshihara et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6879307 | Stern | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6886956 | Parker et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6887202 | Currie et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6888678 | Nishiyama et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6889565 | DeConde et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6893677 | Yamada et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6897164 | Baude et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6897843 | Ayres et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6900072 | Patel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6906847 | Huibers et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6911891 | Qiu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6911964 | Lee et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6912082 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6919981 | Clikeman et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6934080 | Saccomanno et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936013 | Pevoto | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6936968 | Cross et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6939013 | Asao | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6940631 | Ishikawa | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6943495 | Ma et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947107 | Yoshii et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6947195 | Ohtaka et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950240 | Matsuo | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952301 | Huibers | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6953375 | Ahn et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6961167 | Prins et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6962418 | Utsumi et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6962419 | Huibers | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6963330 | Sugahara et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6965375 | Gettemy et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6967698 | Tanoue et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6967763 | Fujii et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6969635 | Patel et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6970227 | Kida et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6977710 | Akiyama et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6980349 | Huibers et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6985205 | Chol et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6992375 | Robbins et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6996306 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004610 | Yamashita et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004611 | Parker et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7012726 | Miles | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7012732 | Miles | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7014349 | Shinohara et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7019809 | Sekiguchi | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7026821 | Martin et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7038758 | Suzuki | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042618 | Selbrede et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7042643 | Miles | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7046221 | Malzbender | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7046905 | Gardiner et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7048905 | Paparatto et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050035 | Iisaka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050141 | Yokoue | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050219 | Kimura | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7050790 | Yamaga | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7057790 | Selbrede | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7060895 | Kothari et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7071611 | Yonekubo et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7072096 | Holman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7075702 | Huibers et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7092142 | Selebrede et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7110158 | Miles | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7116464 | Osawa | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7119944 | Patel et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7123216 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7123796 | Steckl et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126738 | Miles | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7140751 | Lin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7156548 | Teng et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7161094 | Kothari et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7164250 | Boscolo et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7164520 | Palmateer et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7180677 | Fujii et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7184202 | Miles et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7196837 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198982 | Patel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7199916 | Faase et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7215459 | Huibers et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7217588 | Hartzell et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7218437 | Selbrede | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7227677 | Ravnkilde et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7271945 | Hagood et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7274416 | Feenstra et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7291363 | Miller | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7292235 | Nose | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7298448 | Wu | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7304785 | Hagood et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7304786 | Hagood et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7315294 | Richards | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7359108 | Hayes et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7365897 | Hagood et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7374328 | Kuroda et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7391493 | Kim | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7391552 | Barton et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7405852 | Brosnihan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7417735 | Cummings et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7417782 | Hagood et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7460290 | Hagood, IV et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7463227 | Van Gorkom | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7463398 | Feenstra et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7502159 | Hagood, IV et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7529012 | Hayes et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7551344 | Hagood et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7573547 | Palmateer et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7616368 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7619806 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7636189 | Hagood et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7666049 | Saito et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7675665 | Hagood et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7715080 | Natarajan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7729037 | Hagood, IV et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742016 | Hagood et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7742215 | Hagood et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7746529 | Hagood et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7755582 | Hagood et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7826127 | Khonsari et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7839356 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7852546 | Fijol et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7876489 | Gandhi et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7898714 | Hagood, IV et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7927654 | Hagood et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7975665 | Mori | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7999994 | Hagood, IV et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8159428 | Hagood et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8169679 | Wu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8310442 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 20010001260 | Parker et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028993 | Sanford | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010040538 | Quanrud | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043177 | Huston et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010043208 | Furness, III | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048265 | Miller et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048431 | Laffargue et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053075 | Parker et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020000959 | Colgan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020001051 | Krusius et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020009275 | Williams et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020015215 | Miles | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020024641 | Ilkov et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020024711 | Miles | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030566 | Bozler et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020047172 | Reid | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054424 | Miles | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054487 | Parker et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056900 | Liu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020063218 | Maydanich et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020063661 | Comiskey et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020070931 | Ishikawa | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075555 | Miles | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020080598 | Parker et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020093722 | Chan et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020109903 | Kaeriyama | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020113281 | Cunningham et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126364 | Miles | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126387 | Ishikawa et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132389 | Patel et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020141174 | Parker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020149828 | Miles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020150698 | Kawabata | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163482 | Sullivan | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163484 | Furness et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020163709 | Mirza | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020171327 | Miller et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181597 | Okada | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020185699 | Reid | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020191267 | Flanders et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020195423 | Patel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020196522 | Little et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030001815 | Cui | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030007344 | Parker | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009898 | Slocum et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030010894 | Yoshihara et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023110 | Tam et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030029705 | Qiu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030036215 | Reid | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043157 | Miles | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043337 | Takabayashi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030048036 | Lemkin | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058543 | Sheedy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030063233 | Takagi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030063234 | Oda et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030068118 | Bourgeois et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030071686 | Lemkin | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072070 | Miles | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030076649 | Speakman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081315 | Kobayashi | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081402 | Jeon et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030085650 | Cathey et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030085867 | Grabert | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030095081 | Furness et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030095398 | Parker et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030102810 | Cross et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123245 | Parker et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123246 | Parker | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030123247 | Parker et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030128218 | Struyk | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133284 | Chipchase et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030137499 | Iisaka | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030152872 | Miles | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156422 | Tatewaki et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164814 | Starkweather et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174422 | Miller et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174931 | Rodgers et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183008 | Bang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030184189 | Sinclair | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190535 | Fries | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190536 | Fries | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030196590 | Hartzell | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202338 | Parker | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210811 | Dubowsky et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231160 | Yoshihara et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001033 | Goodwin-Johansson et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040012946 | Parker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040027636 | Miles | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040051929 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040058532 | Miles et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040076008 | Ikeda | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080240 | Miller et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080484 | Heines et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040080927 | Parker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040085749 | Parker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088629 | Ott | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090144 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040095739 | Parker et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040100677 | Huibers et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040113903 | Mikami et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040114346 | Parker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040122328 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125062 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125346 | Huibers | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135273 | Parker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040135951 | Stumbo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136204 | Asao | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040136680 | Medina et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145580 | Perlman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145854 | Tamura | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040157664 | Link | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040165372 | Parker | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040171206 | Rodgers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040173872 | Park et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040179146 | Nilsson | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196215 | Duthaler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196525 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207768 | Liu | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040207815 | Allen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212759 | Hayashi | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218149 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218154 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218292 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040218293 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223088 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040223240 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040227428 | Sinclair | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233392 | Huibers | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233498 | Starkweather et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040240032 | Miles | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246275 | Yoshihara et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263076 | De Zwart et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263502 | Dallas et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263944 | Miles et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050002082 | Miles | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050002086 | Starkweather et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050007759 | Parker | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050012197 | Smith et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050024849 | Parker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050052681 | Kogi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059184 | Sniegowski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050062708 | Yoshihara et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050063037 | Selebrede et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050072032 | McCollum et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050073471 | Selbrede | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088404 | Heines et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050093465 | Yonekubo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050094240 | Huibers et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050094418 | Parker | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050104804 | Feenstra et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111238 | Parker | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050111241 | Parker | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116798 | Bintoro et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050122560 | Sampsell et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050122591 | Parker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123243 | Steckl et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123349 | Koch | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128370 | Moon | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134805 | Conner et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050140636 | Chung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050141076 | Bausenwein et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050151940 | Asao | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157365 | Ravnkilde et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050157376 | Huibers et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168431 | Chui | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050168789 | Glent-Madsen | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171408 | Parker | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050172625 | Starkweather et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050179977 | Chui et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195467 | Kothari et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050195468 | Sampsell | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050206991 | Chui et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207154 | Parker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207178 | Parker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212734 | Kimura | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050212738 | Gally | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213183 | Miles | Sep 2005 | A9 |
| 20050213322 | Parker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213323 | Parker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213349 | Parker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219679 | Ishikawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050219680 | Ishikawa | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225501 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225519 | Naugler | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225732 | Conner et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050225827 | Kastalsky | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231790 | Miles | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050231791 | Sampsell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050237596 | Selbrede | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050242710 | Yamazaki et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050243023 | Reddy et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244099 | Pasch et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050244949 | Miles | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245313 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050247477 | Kothari et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249966 | Tung et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050253779 | Feenstra et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050254115 | Palmateer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050258571 | Dumond et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259198 | Lubart et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050263866 | Wan | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265029 | Epstein et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275072 | Haluzak et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050285816 | Glass | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286113 | Miles | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286114 | Miles | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060001942 | Chui et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060003676 | Bernard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060004928 | Hess et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007514 | Desai | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060007701 | Schoellmann et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060012781 | Fradkin et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060023287 | Przybyla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028708 | Miles | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028811 | Ross et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028817 | Parker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028840 | Parker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028841 | Parker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028843 | Parker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060028844 | Parker | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060033676 | Faase et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060033975 | Miles | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038766 | Morita | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060038768 | Sagawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060044246 | Mignard | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060044298 | Mignard et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060044508 | Mochizuki | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060044928 | Chui et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060061559 | King | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066540 | Hewlett et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066560 | Gally et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066598 | Floyd | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066934 | Selbrede | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066937 | Chui | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077125 | Floyd | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077153 | Cummings et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060077533 | Miles et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060092490 | McCollum et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060104061 | Lerner et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060132383 | Gally et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060132404 | Hayes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060139734 | Selebrede et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060146389 | Selbrede | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060152476 | Van Gorkom et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154078 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060172745 | Knowles | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187190 | Hagood et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187191 | Hagood et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187290 | Nakashima | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060187528 | Hagood et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209000 | Sumiyoshi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209012 | Hagood | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060238443 | Derichs | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250325 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060250676 | Hagood | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256039 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262060 | Amundson | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060262380 | Miles | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268386 | Selbrede et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268568 | Oku et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060270179 | Yang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060280319 | Wang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291034 | Patry et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291771 | Braunisch et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060291774 | Schoellmann et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070002156 | Hagood, IV et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070002413 | Psaltis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070003055 | Bark et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070007889 | Bongaerts et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070030555 | Barton et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070031097 | Heikenfeld et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070035808 | Amundson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070040982 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047051 | Selbrede et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070047887 | Selbrede | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070052660 | Montbach et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053652 | Mignard et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086078 | Hagood et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091011 | Selbrede | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070091038 | Hagood et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070103209 | Lee | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127108 | Hayes et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150813 | Selebrede et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070159679 | Hagood et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172171 | Van Ostrand et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070190265 | Aoki et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070195026 | Hagood et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205969 | Hagood et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070216987 | Hagood et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070223080 | Hagood, IV et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070247401 | Sasagawa et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070279727 | Gandhi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070297747 | Biernath et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080014557 | Kuhn et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080026066 | Roser | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080030827 | Hagood et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037104 | Hagood et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080062500 | Hagood | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080094853 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123175 | Hagood et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080129681 | Hagood et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080145527 | Hagood et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158635 | Hagood et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080158636 | Hagood et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165122 | Duthaler et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080174532 | Lewis | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278798 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279727 | Haushalter | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080283175 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080297880 | Steckl et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090034052 | Hagood et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103164 | Fijol et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090103281 | Koh | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141335 | Feenstra et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195855 | Steyn et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284824 | Feenstra et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20110122474 | Payne et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110148948 | Gandhi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110164067 | Lewis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205259 | Hagood, IV | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255146 | Brosnihan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267668 | Hagood, IV et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120133006 | Hasselbach et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120169795 | Hagood et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120200906 | Wu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120229226 | Oja et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120280971 | Hagood et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120320111 | Hagood, IV et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120320112 | Hagood, IV et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120320113 | Hagood, IV et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130010341 | Hagood et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130010342 | Hagood, IV et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130010344 | Hagood et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1309782 | Aug 2001 | CN |
| 1390045 | Jan 2003 | CN |
| 1402033 | Mar 2003 | CN |
| 1542499 | Nov 2004 | CN |
| 1555472 | Dec 2004 | CN |
| 0 359 45 | Mar 1990 | EP |
| 0366847 | May 1990 | EP |
| 0415625 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0438614 | Jul 1991 | EP |
| 0 495 273 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 0 751 340 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 0757958 | Feb 1997 | EP |
| 0786679 | Jul 1997 | EP |
| 0 884 525 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0889458 | Jan 1999 | EP |
| 1 091 342 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1091343 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1091842 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1093142 | Apr 2001 | EP |
| 1 202 096 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1202244 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1 426 190 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1 429 310 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1 471 495 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 1533853 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1551002 | Jul 2005 | EP |
| 1674893 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1734502 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 1757958 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 2263968 | Dec 2010 | EP |
| 1858796 | Jan 2011 | EP |
| 2287110 | Feb 2011 | EP |
| 1640770 | Apr 2012 | EP |
| 2 726 135 | Oct 1994 | FR |
| 57062028 | Apr 1982 | JP |
| 57127264 | Aug 1982 | JP |
| 03-142409 | Jun 1991 | JP |
| 04-249203 | Sep 1992 | JP |
| 5045648 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 6194649 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 8334752 | Dec 1996 | JP |
| 9198906 | Jul 1997 | JP |
| 11-015393 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 11024038 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 2000105547 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000121970 | Apr 2000 | JP |
| 2000172219 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 2000214831 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2001125014 | May 2001 | JP |
| 2001154642 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2001175216 | Jun 2001 | JP |
| 2001201767 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2001356327 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2002214543 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2002528763 | Sep 2002 | JP |
| 2002318564 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2002365650 | Dec 2002 | JP |
| 2003-162904 | Jun 2003 | JP |
| 2004287215 | Oct 2004 | JP |
| 2004534280 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2004347982 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005512119 | Apr 2005 | JP |
| 2006522360 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| WO-9401716 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| 9528035 | Oct 1995 | WO |
| WO-9704436 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO-9804950 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO-9901696 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO-0050807 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| 0052674 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO-0052674 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO-0055916 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO0169584 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| WO-0207482 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO03004836 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-03007049 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-03008860 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO03008860 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-03040802 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO03048836 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO-03050448 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO-03061329 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO-03069593 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO03081315 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004019120 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO2004034136 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004088629 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004086098 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| 2004097506 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005001892 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005062908 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO-2005073950 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2005082908 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO-2006017129 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006023077 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006039315 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006052755 | May 2006 | WO |
| 2006091738 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| 2006091904 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO2006091791 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO2007075832 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO2007123173 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO2007145973 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO2008026066 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| 2010062647 | Jun 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “BLU,” Heesung Precision Ltd., http://www.hspr.co.kr/eng/product/blu.asp Retrieved on Aug. 3, 2006. |
| “Electronic Display Lighting Tutorials,” 3M Corporation, file?//D:/Optical\Vikuiti Tutorial.htm. retrieved on Aug. 10, 2006. |
| “Microprism Technology for Luminaires,” Reflexite Corporation, Technical Publication RLO-181, Rev. 2 (2003). |
| “Optical Design Tools for Backlight Displays,” Light Tools, Optical Engineering, Publication of ROCOES, 81:90-101 (Jun. 2003). |
| “Prism Brightness Enhancement Films,” 3M Corporation, http://products3.3m.com/catalog/us/en001/electronics—mfg/vikuiti/node—V6G78RBQ5Tbe/root—GST1T4S9TCgv/vroot—S6Q2FD9X0Jge/gvel—GD378D0HGJgl/theme—us—vikuiti—3—0/command—AbcPageHandler/output—html Retrieved on Aug. 3, 2006. |
| “Prism Sheet,” Mitsubishi Rayon America Inc., http://www.mrany.com/data/HTML/29.htm Retrieved on Aug. 4, 2006. |
| Akimoto et al, “15.1: A 0.9-in UXGA/HDTV FLC Microdisplay,” SID 00 Digest, 194-197(2000). |
| Alt et al, “A Gray-Scale Addressing Technique for Thin-Film-Transistor/Liquid Crystal Displays,” IBM J. Res. Develop., 36(1):11-22(Jan. 1992). |
| Blackstone, “Making MEMS Reliable,” SPIE's OEMagazine, 32-34(Sep. 2002). |
| Boeuf, “Plasma display panels: physics, recent developments and key issues,” J. Phys. D: Appl, Phys., 36:R53-R79(2003). |
| Bozler et al, “Arrays of gated field-emitter cones having 0.32 mm tip-to-tip spacing,” J. Vec. Sci. Technol. B, 12(2):629-632(Mar./Apr. 1994). |
| Chino et. al. “Development of Wide-Color-Gamut Mobile Displays with Four-Primary-Color LCDs”, Society of Information Display, Digest of Technical Papers 2006, p. 1221. |
| Clark et al, “FLC Microdisplays,” Ferroelectrics, 246:97-110(2000). |
| Davis, “Light Emitting Diode Source Modeling for Optical Design,” Reflexite Display Optics(Oct. 2004). |
| Davis, “Microstructured Optics for LED Applications,” Reflexite Display Optics (2002). |
| den Boer, “Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Displays,” Elsevier Science & Technology Books, ISBN #0750678135, Aug. 2005. |
| Doane, et al, “Display Technologies in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus,” World Technology Evaluation Center Panel Report (Dec. 1994). |
| Doherty, D. et. al. “Pulse Width Modulation Control of DLP Projectors”, TI Technical Journal 1998, No. 3, p. 115. |
| Feenstra et al, “Electrowetting Displays,” Liquavista BV, http://www.liquavista.com/documents/electrowetting—displays—whitepaper.pdf, Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2006. |
| Feng et al, “Novel integrated light-guide plates for liquid crystal display backlight,” J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt., 7:111-117(2005). |
| Feng, “High Quality Light Guide Plates that Can Control the Illumination Angle Based on Microprism Structures,” Applied Physics Letters, 85(24):6016-6018(Dec. 2004). |
| Foley, “NE04-21: Microstructured Plastic Optics for Display, Lighting, and Telecommunications Applications,” Fresnel Optics(2001). |
| Funamoto et. al. “LED Backlight System with Double-Prism Pattern”, Journal of the Society for Information Display v. 14, p. 1045 (2006). |
| Goddhue et al, “Bright-field analysis of field-emission cones using high-resolution tranmission electron microscopy and the effect of structural properties on current stability,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 12(2):693-696(Mar.-Apr. 1994). |
| Hartman, “4.1: Invited paper: Two-Terminal Devices Technologies for AMLCDs,” SID 95 Digest, 7-10(1995). |
| Hornbeck, “Digital Light Processing™: A New MEMS-Based Display Technology,” Technical Digest of the IEEJ 14th Sensor Symposium, pp. 297-304 (Jun. 4-5, 1996). |
| Johnstone et al, “Theoretical limits on the freestanding length of cantilevers produced by surface micromachining technology,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 12:855-861(2002). |
| Jones et al, “29-1: Addressing tVmin Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Displays,” (1998). |
| Kalantar et al, “Optical Micro Deflector Based Functional Light-Guide Plate for Backlight Unit,” SID 00 Digest, 1029-1031(2000). |
| Kalantar, “Modulation of viewing angle on an LCD surface through backlight optics,” Journal of the SID, 11(4):647-652(2003). |
| Koden et al, “Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Display,” (Sep. 17, 1997). |
| Kuang et al, “Dynamic Characteristics of shaped micro-actuators solved using the differential quadrature method,” J. Micromech. Microeng. 14:647-655(2004). |
| Kunzman and G. Pettitt, “White Enhancement for Color Sequential DLP” Society for Information Display, Digest of Technical Papers 1998. |
| Lee et al, “P-25: A LCOS Microdisplay Driver with Frame Buffering Pixels,” SID 02 Digest, 292-295(2002). |
| Legtenberg et al, “Electrostatic Curved Electrode Actuators,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 6:3(257-265)(Sep. 1997). |
| Li et al, “Drie-Fabricated Curved-Electrode Zipping Actuators with Low Pull-In Voltage,” IEE, 480-483 (2003). |
| Liang et al, “Observation of electric field gradients near field-emission cathode arrays,” Appl Phys. Lett., 66(9):1147-1149(Feb. 1995). |
| Liu et al, “Scaling Laws of Microactuators and Potential Applications of Electroactive Polymers in MEMS,” SPIE, 3669:345-354(Mar. 1999). |
| Maboudian et al, “Stiction reduction processes for surface micromachines,” Tribology Letters, 3:215-221(1997). |
| Markandey, V., et al., “Video Processing for DLP Display Systems,” Texas Instruments Corporation, 2666:21-32 (Mar. 13, 1996). |
| Mastrangelo et al, “Mechanical Stability and Adhesion of Microstructures Under Capillary Forces—Part I: Basic Theory,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2(1):33-43(Mar. 1993). |
| Mastrangelo et al, “Mechanical Stability and Adhesion of Microstructures Under Capillary Forces—Part II: Experiments,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 2(1):44-55(Mar. 1993). |
| McLaughlin, “Progress in Projection and Large-Area Displays,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(4):521-532(Apr. 2002). |
| Okumura et al, “Highly-efficient backlight for liquid crystal display having no optical films,” Applied Physics Letters, 83(13):2515-2517(Sep. 2003). |
| Perregaux et al, “Arrays of Addressable High-Speed Optical Microshutters,” IEEE, 232-235, (2001). |
| Qiu et al, “A Curved-Beam Bistable Mechanism,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 13(2):137-145(Apr. 2004). |
| Qui et al, “A High-Current Electrothermal Bistable MEMS Relay,” Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, MEMS-03 Kyoto, pp. 64-67 (Jan. 19-23, 2003). |
| Ravnkilde et al, “Fabrication of Nickel Microshutter Arrays for Spatial Light Modulation,” Meso 2002, also on their website: http://www2.mic.dtu.dk/research/mems/publications/Papers/Dicon—Meso2002.pdf (2002). |
| Roosendaal et al, “25.2: A Wide Gamut, High Aperture Mobile Spectrum Sequential Liquid Crystal Display,” SID 05 Digest, 1116-1119(2005). |
| Sato, “Research on Flexible Display Systems,” Broadcast Technology, 21:10-15(2005). |
| Sharp Specification No. LCP-03015 for Mobile Liquid Crystal Display Group, Sharp Corporation, Jun. 13, 2003. |
| Shikida et al, “Fabrication fo an S-shaped Microactuator,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, 6(1):18-24(Mar. 1997). |
| Steyn, Lodewyck, “Electroquasistatic Zipper Actuators: A Technology Review”, Dec. 2004. |
| Takatori et al, “6.3: Field-Sequential Smectic LCD with TFT Pixel Amplifier,” SID 01 Digest, 48-51(2001). |
| Teijido, J.M., “Conception and Design of Illumination Light Pipes,” Thesis No. 1498 for University of Neuchatel, http://www.unige.ch/cyberdocuments/unine/theses2000/TeijidoJM/these—front.htm I:1-99 Retrieved on Aug. 3, 2006. |
| Tien et al, “MEMS Actuators for Silicon Micro-Optical Elements,” Proc. of SPIE, 4178:256-269, (2000). |
| Underwood, “A review of microdisplay technologies,” SID@EID, (Nov. 21 to 23, 2000). |
| Underwood, “LCoS through the looking glass,” SID(2001). |
| Vangbo et al, “A lateral symmetrically bistable buckled beam,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 8:29-32(1998). |
| Wang et al, “Highly Space-Efficient Electrostatic Zigzag Transmissive Micro-Optic Switches for an Integrated MEMS Optical Display System” Transducers 03 Conference, 1:575-575 (Jun. 8-12, 2003). |
| Yamada et al, “52.2: Invited Paper:Color Sequential LCD Based on OCB with an LED Backlight,” SID 00 Digest, 1180-1183(2000). |
| Yasumura et al, “Fluid Damping of an Electrostatic Actuator for Optical Switching Applications,” Transducers Research Foundation (2002). |
| Feenstra, B.J., et. al. “A Reflective Display Based on Electrowetting: Principle and Properties”, International Display Research Conference Proceedings 2003, p. 322. |
| Bergquist et. al. “Field Sequential Colour Display with Adaptive Gamut”, Society for Information Display, Digest of Technical Papers 2006, p. 1594. |
| Boucinha, M., et al, “Air-gam amorphous silicon thin film transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, 73(4):502-4 (1998). |
| Conde, J.P., et al., “Low-temperature Thin-Film Silicon MEMS”, Thin Solid Films 421:181-186 (2003). |
| Conde, J.P., et. al., “Amorphous and microcrystalline silicon deposited by hot-wire chemical vapor deposition at low substrate temperatures: application to devices and thin-film microelectromechanical systems,” Thin Solid Films 395:105-111 (2001). |
| European Patent Office Examination Report dated Sep. 7, 2009 in European Patent Application No. 06847859.3. |
| European Search Opinion for EP Patent Application No. EP08005944, European Patent Office, Munich filed on Dec. 4, 2012. |
| European Search Opinion for EP Patent Application No. EP08005973, European Patent Office, Munich filed on Oct. 4, 2012. |
| European Search Opinion for EP Patent Application No. EP10175901, European Patent Office, Munich filed on Feb. 5, 2012. |
| European Search Opinion for EP Patent Application No. EP10175920, European Patent Office, Munich filed on Sep. 5, 2012. |
| European Search Report—EP10004275—Search Authority—Munich—Jun. 7, 2011. |
| European Search Report—EP10176478—Search Authority—Munich—May 4, 2012. |
| European Search Report—EP10177217—Search Authority—Munich—Mar. 13, 2012. |
| Funamoto et al, “Diffusive-sheetless Backlight System for Mobile Phone,” IDW/AD, 1277-1280 (2005). |
| Final Office Action dated May 18, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,690. |
| Final Office Action dated Oct. 3, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,690. |
| Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/546,937. |
| Flat Panel Display (FPD) Manufacturing Equipment that Cuts Production Costs by Half, Shibaura Mechatronics Corporation, product brochure for panel processing. |
| Hewlett et al, “DLP CinemaTM projection: A hybrid frame-rate technique for flicker-free performance,” Journ of the SID 9/3, 221-226 (2001). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Oct. 28, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2009/002288. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 26, 2010, in International Application No. PCT/US2009/000922. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 12, 2011 in International Application No. PCT/US2009/062365. |
| International Search Report—PCT/US2007/013277 dated May 16, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2006/006448—ISA/EPO—Jun. 28, 2006. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2006/006552—ISA/EPO—Sep. 14, 2006. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2006/006680, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Sep. 14, 2006. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2006/006761, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Sep. 15, 2006. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2006/048679, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Oct. 4, 2007. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2007/026470, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Sep. 26, 2008. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2009/0062252, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Jun. 11, 2010. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 21, 2009 in International Application No. PCT/US2009/002288. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 29, 2009 in International Application No. PCT/US2009/000922. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 8, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2009/062365. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 7, 2010 in International Application No. PCT/US2009/049826. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued May 20, 2011, during the prosecution of International Application No. PCT/US2011/023402. |
| Heikenfeld, J., et. al., “Contrast Enhancement in Black Dielectric Electroluminescent Devices”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 49: 8, 1348-52 (2002). |
| Jepsen et al, “4.11: 0.9″ SXGA Liquid Crystal on Silicon Panel with 450 Hz. Field Rate,” SID MicroDisplay Corporation, pp. 106-109 (Sep. 2001). |
| Joaquirn, M., “Polyphenyl Ether Lubricants” Synthetic Lubricants and High-performance Functional Fluids, R. L. Rudnick and R. L. Shubkin, Eds., p. 239, Marcel Dekker, Inc., NY, 1999. |
| Judy, et al, “Self-Adjusting Microstructures(SAMS),” Proceedings of the Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, New York, Jan. 30, 1991, vol. Workshop 4, pp. 51-56. |
| Judy, M. W., “Micromechanisms Using Sidewall Beams,” Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1994. |
| Kalantar, K., et al., “Backlight Unit with Double Surface Light Emission Using a Single Micro-structured Light-guide Plate,” p. 1182, Society for Information Display Digest (2004). |
| Kim, C.W., et al., “Manufacturing Technologies for the Next Generation a-Si TFT-LCD,” Proceedings of the Intl. Display Mfg. Cnf. Seoul, Korea (2000). |
| Lee et. al. “40.1: Distingusihed Contributed Paper: Integrated Amorphous Silicon Color Sensor on LCD Panel for LED Backlight Feedback Control System”, Society for Information Display, Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 1376-1379 (2005). |
| “Nano TM Su-8 2000 Negative Tone Photoresist Formulations 2002-2025,” Micro Che, Rev. 2/02m. |
| Non Final Office Action Dated Mar. 22, 2007, U.S. Appl. No. 11/546,937. |
| Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2006, U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,690. |
| Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due, mailed Jan. 31, 2008 (U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,785). |
| Office Action dated Jul. 13, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-556428. |
| Office Action dated Oct. 12, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-058190. |
| Park, Y.I., et al., “Active Matrix OLED Displays Using Simple Poly-Si TFT Process,” Society of Information Display, Digest, pp. 487-489 (2003). |
| Pasricha, S.,et. al. “Dynamic Backlight Adaptation for Low Power Handheld Devices” IEEE Design and Test v. 21, p. 398 (2004). |
| Saeedi, et. al. “Molten-Alloy Driven Self-Assembly for Nano and Micro Scale System Integration” Fluid Dynamics and Materials Processing, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 221-245 (2006). |
| Tagaya et al., “Thin Liquid-Crystal Display Backlight System with Highly Scattering Optical Transmission Polymers,” Applied Optics, 40 (34): 6274-6280 (Dec. 2001). |
| Tan et al “Soldering Technology for Optoelectronics Packaging”, 1996 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 26-36 (1996). |
| van de Biggelaar, et. al. “Passive and Active Matrix Addressed Polymer Light-emitting Diode Displays”, Proc. SPIE vol. 4295, p. 134 (2001). |
| Wang et al., “A highly efficient system for automatic face region detection in MPEG video.” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 7 Issue 4, Aug. 1997, pp. 615-628. |
| Office Action dated Dec. 5, 2011 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-058190. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 15, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-556428. |
| Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2012 in European Patent Office Application No. 07795777.7. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2011 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-556428. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120169795 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60655827 | Feb 2005 | US | |
| 60676053 | Apr 2005 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11326900 | Jan 2006 | US |
| Child | 13416542 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11251035 | Oct 2005 | US |
| Child | 11326900 | US |
