All publications, including patents and patent applications, mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The present invention generally relates to acoustically coupling ultrasound devices to a patient. More specifically, the present invention relates to acoustically coupling ultrasound therapy devices to a patient for treatment of tissue.
Histotripsy and Lithotripsy are non-invasive tissue ablation modalities that focus pulsed ultrasound from outside the body to a target tissue inside the body. Histotripsy mechanically damages tissue through cavitation of microbubbles, and Lithotripsy is typically used to fragment urinary stones with acoustic shockwaves.
Histotripsy is the mechanical disruption via acoustic cavitation of a target tissue volume or tissue embedded inclusion as part of a surgical or other therapeutic procedure. Histotripsy works best when a whole set of acoustic and transducer scan parameters controlling the spatial extent of periodic cavitation events are within a rather narrow range. Small changes in any of the parameters can result in discontinuation of the ongoing process.
Histotripsy requires high peak intensity acoustic pulses which in turn require large surface area focused transducers. These transducers are often very similar to the transducers used for Lithotripsy and often operate in the same frequency range. The primary difference is in how the devices are driven electrically.
Histotripsy pulses consist of a (usually) small number of cycles of a sinusoidal driving voltage whereas Lithotripsy is (most usually) driven by a single high voltage pulse with the transducer responding at its natural frequencies. Even though the Lithotripsy pulse is only one cycle, its negative pressure phase length is equal to or greater than the entire length of the Histotripsy pulse, lasting tens of microseconds. This negative pressure phase allows generation and continual growth of the bubbles, resulting in bubbles of sizes up to 1 mm. The Lithotripsy pulses use the mechanical stress produced by a shockwave and these 1 mm bubbles to cause tissue damage.
In comparison, each negative and positive cycle of a Histotripsy pulse grows and collapses the bubbles, and the next cycle repeats the same process. The maximal sizes of bubbles reach approximately tens to hundreds of microns. These micron size bubbles interact with a tissue surface to mechanically damage tissue.
In addition, Histotripsy delivers hundreds to thousands of pulses per second, i.e., 100-1 kHz pulse repetition frequency. Lithotripsy only works well within a narrow range of pulse repetition frequency (usually 0.5-1 Hz). Studies show that the efficacy and efficiency of lithotripsy decreases significantly when the pulse repetition frequency is increased to 10-100 Hz. The reduced efficiency is likely due to the increased number of mm size bubbles blocking the shock waves and other energy from reaching the stone.
Histotripsy transducers have a focal point positioned a distance from the transducer where the cavitational bubble clouds are formed. In order to non-invasively treat tissue inside a patient, the transducers must be positioned away from the patient's skin so as to locate the cavitational focal point on the target tissue. Thus, when the transducer is positioned away from the patient's skin, the pulsed ultrasound of a Histotripsy ultrasound transducer must be carried through an aqueous coupling medium that is in intimate contact with the ultrasound transducer and the skin surface.
One prior solution to acoustic coupling for therapeutic ultrasound includes a water bath disposed in a treatment table. During therapy, the patient lies with the body immersed in the water bath. This coupling solution is both cumbersome and expensive as it requires a specialized examination table and is not versatile or portable. Additionally, it requires a large volume of an acoustic coupling medium (typically degassed water) which is expensive and can be messy.
Thus, there is a need for an inexpensive, minimal, and versatile acoustic coupling device for use in ultrasonic therapy applications such as Histotripsy and Lithotripsy.
In one embodiment, a method of treating a prostate of a patient comprises imaging the prostate with an ultrasound probe, placing an acoustic medium container over a perineum of the patient, and applying ultrasonic therapy through the acoustic medium container to cause mechanical fractionation of a target portion of the prostate.
In one embodiment, the prostate can be imaged by inserting the ultrasound probe into the patient's rectum to image the prostate. In some embodiments, the ultrasound probe is inserted into a rectal sheath to provide a liquid seal barrier between the ultrasound probe and the patient's rectum.
In some embodiments, the method comprises at least partially filling the acoustic medium container with an acoustic coupling medium, such as degassed water. In some embodiments, the acoustic coupling medium directly contacts the patient's skin. In other embodiments, the acoustic coupling medium does not directly contact the patient's skin.
In other embodiments, the method further comprises securing the acoustic medium container to the patient with an adhesive. In other embodiments, the method comprises securing the acoustic medium container to the patient with a strap. The acoustic medium container can be secured to the patient to form a liquid seal between the container and the patient's skin.
The applying step can further comprise applying ultrasonic therapy with an ultrasonic therapy transducer coupled to the acoustic medium container. In some embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises applying histotripsy to treat the patient. In other embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises forming cavitation bubbles in the target portion of the prostate. In additional embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises applying acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle between approximately 0.1% and 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz.
In additional embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises applying lithotripsy or HIFU to treat the patient.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises expelling a volume of the acoustic coupling medium into a remote reservoir from the acoustic medium container when the acoustic medium container is compressed, and infusing a volume of the acoustic coupling medium into the acoustic medium container from the remote reservoir when the acoustic medium container is expanded.
In another embodiment, an ultrasound therapy device is provided, comprising a frame configured to conform to and provide a liquid seal against a patient's skin, a reservoir portion configured to hold an acoustic coupling medium in direct contact with the patient's skin, and an, ultrasound transducer in acoustic communication with the acoustic coupling medium, wherein movement of the ultrasound transducer relative to the frame maintains acoustic communication between the ultrasound transducer and the acoustic coupling medium.
In some embodiments, the ultrasound therapy device further comprising a rectal imaging probe configured to image the patient's prostate. In one embodiment, the reservoir portion comprises a sheath configured to receive the rectal imaging probe.
In one embodiment, the frame is sized and shaped to conform to a male patient's anatomy surrounding the perineum.
In some embodiments of the ultrasound therapy device, the reservoir portion is pliable. In other embodiments, the reservoir portion is transparent. In another embodiment, the reservoir portion is open so as to expose the acoustic coupling medium to air.
In some embodiments, the ultrasound transducer is coupled to the reservoir portion and configured to direct ultrasonic therapy through the perineum to the patient's prostate.
In one embodiment, the ultrasound therapy device further comprises a sling configured to hold the patient's scrotum away from the perineum.
In one embodiment, the ultrasound transducer is submerged in the acoustic coupling medium.
In another embodiment, the reservoir portion is sealed to contain the acoustic coupling medium against the patient's skin.
In many embodiments, the acoustic coupling medium comprises a degassed water. In other embodiments, the acoustic coupling medium comprises an acoustic gel.
In some embodiments of the ultrasound therapy device, the frame is secured to the patient with an adhesive. In other embodiments, the frame is secured to the patient with a strap. In another embodiment, the frame comprises a wearable garment. The wearable garment can provide a liquid seal against the patient's skin near the patient's waist and near the patient's legs, for example. Alternatively, the wearable garment can provide a liquid seal against the patient's skin around the patient's perineum.
In some embodiments, the ultrasound therapy device further comprises a remote reservoir configured to receive the acoustic coupling medium from the reservoir portion when the reservoir portion is compressed and to deliver the acoustic coupling medium to the reservoir portion when the reservoir portion is expanded.
In some embodiments, the ultrasonic transducer is configured to deliver a histotripsy pulse to the patient's prostate. In another embodiment, the ultrasonic transducer is configured to form cavitation bubbles in the patient's prostate. In yet another embodiment, the ultrasonic transducer is configured to deliver acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle between approximately 0.1% and 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz.
An ultrasound coupling container is also provided, comprising a frame configured to provide a liquid seal against a patient's skin, the frame including first and second portions sized and configured to conform to each side of the patient's groin, and a reservoir portion coupled to the frame and configured to allow positioning and movement of an ultrasound transducer over the patient's perineum and prostate.
In some embodiments, the ultrasound coupling container further comprises a rectal sheath coupled to the reservoir portion.
In another embodiment, the ultrasound coupling container further comprises a receptacle coupled to the reservoir portion, the receptacle configured to receive the ultrasound transducer.
In some embodiments, the reservoir portion is pliable.
In other embodiments, the frame comprises a third portion connecting the first and second portions, the third portion being configured to conform to the patient's skin below the rectum.
In some embodiments, the ultrasound coupling container further comprises a sling configured to hold the patient's scrotum away from the perineum.
In another embodiment, the frame is coupled to a wearable garment that is configured to be worn by the patient.
In addition to imaging tissue, ultrasound technology is increasingly being used to treat and destroy tissue. In medical applications such as Histotripsy, where ultrasound pulses are used to form cavitational microbubbles in tissue to mechanically break down and destroy tissue, it is necessary to acoustically couple the ultrasound therapy transducer to the patient while allowing for movement of the therapy transducer in all directions. Particular challenges arise in the application of Histotripsy for the treatment of BPH and prostate cancer, where the male anatomy provides only a small acoustic window through the perineum to deliver ultrasound energy. The present invention describes several embodiments of an ultrasound coupling apparatus for acoustically coupling an ultrasound therapy transducer to a patient. In particular, the present invention provides for acoustic coupling of ultrasound therapy transducers, such as those used in Histotripsy, Lithotripsy, and HIFU, for the treatment of a variety of medical conditions including but not limited to BPH and prostate cancer.
Referring now to
Frame 102 can comprise a pliable material that is configured to conform to a patient's skin and provide a liquid seal against the patient's skin. The frame may also include, for example, foam or another conforming material 103 to improve the liquid seal between the frame to skin interface. Referring still to
As shown in
The pliable nature of the reservoir portion 104 allows the transducer receptacle 118, and thus the ultrasound transducer inserted therein, to be moved with respect to the patient and the frame. In therapeutic applications such as Histotripsy, where the relative position of the therapy transducer with respect to the target tissue must be adjusted to align a therapy focal point with the target tissue, it is necessary to be able to move the therapy transducer while maintaining acoustic communication between the transducer and the patient. Thus, in
The reservoir portion 104 can further include a sheath 120 for acoustically coupling a rectal ultrasonic imaging probe (not shown) to the patient. The sheath can be a pliable and liquid impermeable, similar to a condom. This “condom” like sheath 120 can provide a liquid seal barrier for coupling the rectal ultrasonic imaging probe to the ultrasound coupling container and also can act as the protective barrier for inserting the rectal ultrasonic imaging probe into the patient's rectum, as it is typically done in urological trans-rectal imaging.
Referring now to
When the ultrasound coupling container 200 is positioned as shown in
The pliable nature of the reservoir portion 204 allows the transducer receptacle 218, and thus the ultrasound transducer inserted therein, to be moved with respect to the patient and the frame. In the embodiment of
The ultrasound coupling container 200 may include ports 232 for filling, maintaining and removing the acoustic coupling medium. Filling and draining the reservoir portion may be accomplished by using a gravity feed system similar to an IV bag, as shown by remote reservoir 226. Placing the remote reservoir on an IV pole at the correct height in relationship to the ultrasound coupling container can fill the reservoir portion 204 to the desired fill level and maintain the desired fill level throughout the therapeutic procedure. When treatment is complete, lowering the remote reservoir can allow for draining the ultrasound coupling container back to the remote reservoir for disposal.
Referring still to
During a Histotripsy procedure, the patient can positioned in the extended lithotomy position and the ultrasound coupling container 200 can be applied to the patient's skin. With the ultrasound coupling container secured to the patient, a rectal ultrasonic imaging probe can be prepared and inserted into the sheath 220 and the patient's rectum for imaging of the prostate. Once the rectal ultrasonic imaging probe is positioned and coupled to the ultrasound coupling container, an ultrasound therapy transducer can be coupled to the transducer receptacle 218 and be initially positioned for ultrasound therapy delivery. With the patient, rectal ultrasonic imaging probe, and ultrasound therapy transducer all coupled to the ultrasound coupling container, the container can then be filled with the acoustic coupling medium.
The pouch 334 can further include a transducer receptacle 318 configured to couple to an ultrasound therapy transducer, thus forming a pliable reservoir pouch in the perineal region that allows for movement of the ultrasound therapy transducer during treatment and set-up. Additionally, the pouch can include a sheath 320 configured to receive a rectal ultrasonic imaging probe for imaging of the prostate.
The pouch 334 can be sealed and filled with an acoustic coupling medium, such as degassed water. The pouch 334 may optionally include ports for filling, maintaining and removing the acoustic coupling medium. In some embodiments, the pouch can comprise a transparent plastic that enables the surgeon to directly view the perineum. In contrast to the ultrasound coupling containers described above in
Referring still to
During therapy, an ultrasound therapy transducer can be immersed in the acoustic coupling medium 422, providing acoustic communication between the transducer and the patient. The reservoir of acoustic coupling medium can be large enough to allow for movement of the ultrasound therapy transducer during treatment. In some embodiments, the reservoir level is allowed to rise and fall against the walls 436 as the transducer is inserted and pulled from the reservoir. In other embodiments, the ultrasound coupling container 400 includes ports for filling, maintaining and removing the acoustic coupling medium.
The ultrasound coupling container may incorporate straps, belts, and/or adhesives, as described above, to help secure it to the patient and form the liquid seal against the patient's skin. The ultrasound coupling container may be formed from a transparent plastic that enables the surgeon to directly view the perineum, for example.
As described above, ultrasound coupling container 500 provides a liquid seal against the patient's skin and acoustically couples an ultrasound therapy transducer to the patient. The reservoir portion 504 can be filled with an acoustic coupling medium, and can be formed from a pliable material so as to allow for movement of the ultrasound therapy transducer during treatment. In the embodiment of
Referring still to
In another embodiment, frame 502b may be used to provide a liquid seal between the garment and the patient's skin. In this embodiment, frame 502b can attached to the patient's skin with an adhesive and/or straps, or may contain inflatable bladders to improve the liquid sealing mechanism against the patient's skin. When the frame 502b is sealed against the patient's skin, the entire garment including the reservoir portion may be filled with an acoustic coupling medium. However, this embodiment requires more acoustic coupling medium to be used than if only frame 502a is sealed to the skin.
The bellows can be constructed of plastic, preferably polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), silicone (SI), or polyethylene formulations which are commonly used to make bellows and components with living hinges and flexibility. Plastic bellows can be fabricated economically by blow molding (PP, PVC, and PE), injection molding (PE and SI) or dip coating (PVC). Bellows 640 can also be formed from metals such as titanium or stainless steel; however these are relatively expensive.
The bellows can be made with an extension 646 that may include integral screw threads, snap fittings, bayonet locks or other fittings for attaching to the end caps 644. Alternatively, the caps can be attached with a separate piece that connects to the bellows with an adhesive, a weld, or other attachment methods. The caps 644 can facilitate attachment of an ultrasound therapy transducer 650 having a concave surface 652 on one end of the ultrasound coupling container and a skin adapter 648 on the other end of the ultrasound coupling container at the skin interface.
The inner bladder 642 can be fabricated from highly compliant elastic materials such as silicone, polyurethane, latex, rubber or other such material. The bladder can be filled with an acoustic coupling medium, such as degassed water or a gel (phantom gel). The bladder may include vents 656 for filling or emptying the acoustic coupling medium from the bladder.
In use, the caps 644 can be removed from each end of the ultrasound coupling container to expose the inner compliant bladder 642. The ultrasound therapy transducer 650 can be attached to the top of the ultrasound coupling container, and a skin adapter 648 may be placed on the bottom of the ultrasound coupling container to provide a better seal and improved patient comfort. The skin adapter can be a highly compliant ring fabricated from a sealed foam, an air filled bladder, or other such material. The patient's skin can then be prepped with standard ultrasonic coupling gel 654, which can also be applied to the surface of the ultrasound therapy transducer 650. The ultrasonic coupling gel assures proper transmission of ultrasound at these surfaces.
The embodiments illustrated above in
The remote reservoir can be a bag or other compliant or rigid container. A rigid container would require a vent. A remote reservoir can be similar to an intravenous solution bag that made from PVC or other suitable plastic film. The tubing can be made of PVC or other suitable flexible plastic material. In use, the remote reservoir can be elevated to increase the pressure within the remote reservoir to provide better contact with the bladder skin surfaces.
Methods of treating a prostate with the devices and systems described herein are also provided. In one embodiment, a method of treating a prostate of a patient comprises imaging the prostate with an ultrasound probe, placing an acoustic medium container over a perineum of the patient, and applying ultrasonic therapy through the acoustic medium container to cause mechanical fractionation of a target portion of the prostate.
The acoustic medium container can be any of the acoustic medium containers described herein and throughout
The prostate can be imaged by inserting the ultrasound probe into the patient's rectum to image the prostate. In some embodiments, the ultrasound probe is inserted into a rectal sheath to provide a liquid seal barrier between the ultrasound probe and the patient's rectum.
In some embodiments, the method comprises at least partially filling the acoustic medium container with an acoustic coupling medium, such as degassed water. In some embodiments, the acoustic coupling medium directly contacts the patient's skin. In other embodiments, the acoustic coupling medium does not directly contact the patient's skin.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises securing the acoustic medium container to the patient with an adhesive. In other embodiments, the method comprises securing the acoustic medium container to the patient with a strap. The acoustic medium container can be secured to the patient to form a liquid seal between the container and the patient's skin.
The applying step can further comprise applying ultrasonic therapy with an ultrasonic therapy transducer coupled to the acoustic medium container. In some embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises applying histotripsy to treat the patient. In other embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises forming cavitation bubbles in the target portion of the prostate. In additional embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises applying acoustic pulses that operate at a frequency between approximately 50 KHz and 5 MHz, having a pulse intensity with a peak negative pressure of approximately 8-25 MPa, a peak positive pressure of more than 10 MPa, a pulse length shorter than 50 cycles, a duty cycle between approximately 0.1% and 5%, and a pulse repetition frequency of less than 5 KHz. In additional embodiments, the applying ultrasonic therapy step comprises applying lithotripsy or HIFU to treat the patient.
As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119 of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/234,559, filed Aug. 17, 2009, titled “Disposable Acoustic Coupling Medium Container”. This application is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3243497 | Kendall et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3679021 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
4024501 | Herring et al. | May 1977 | A |
4051394 | Tieden | Sep 1977 | A |
4117446 | Alais | Sep 1978 | A |
4269174 | Adair | May 1981 | A |
4277367 | Madsen et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4351038 | Alais | Sep 1982 | A |
4406153 | Ophir et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4440025 | Hayakawa et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4453408 | Clayman | Jun 1984 | A |
4483345 | Miwa | Nov 1984 | A |
4549533 | Cain et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4550606 | Drost | Nov 1985 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4622972 | Giebeler, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4625731 | Quedens et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641378 | McConnell et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4669483 | Hepp et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4689986 | Carson et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4757820 | Itoh | Jul 1988 | A |
4791915 | Barsotti et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4819621 | Ueberle et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829491 | Saugeon et al. | May 1989 | A |
4856107 | Dory | Aug 1989 | A |
4865042 | Umemura et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4888746 | Wurster et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890267 | Rudolph | Dec 1989 | A |
4922917 | Dory | May 1990 | A |
4938217 | Lele | Jul 1990 | A |
4973980 | Howkins et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4984575 | Uchiyama et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991151 | Dory | Feb 1991 | A |
4995012 | Dory | Feb 1991 | A |
RE33590 | Dory | May 1991 | E |
5014686 | Schafer | May 1991 | A |
5065751 | Wolf | Nov 1991 | A |
5080101 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5080102 | Dory | Jan 1992 | A |
5091893 | Smith et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092336 | Fink | Mar 1992 | A |
5097709 | Masuzawa et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5111822 | Dory | May 1992 | A |
5143073 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5143074 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5150711 | Dory | Sep 1992 | A |
5158070 | Dory | Oct 1992 | A |
5158071 | Umemura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163421 | Bernstein et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5165412 | Okazaki | Nov 1992 | A |
5209221 | Riedlinger | May 1993 | A |
5215680 | D'Arrigo | Jun 1993 | A |
5219401 | Cathignol et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230340 | Rhyne | Jul 1993 | A |
5295484 | Marcus et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5316000 | Chapelon et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354258 | Dory | Oct 1994 | A |
5380411 | Schlief | Jan 1995 | A |
5409002 | Pell | Apr 1995 | A |
5431621 | Dory | Jul 1995 | A |
5435311 | Umemura et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443069 | Schaetzle | Aug 1995 | A |
5469852 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474071 | Chapelon et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474531 | Carter | Dec 1995 | A |
5501655 | Rolt et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520188 | Hennige et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523058 | Umemura et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524620 | Rosenschein | Jun 1996 | A |
5540909 | Schutt | Jul 1996 | A |
5542935 | Unger et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563346 | Bartelt et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5566675 | Li et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573497 | Chapelon | Nov 1996 | A |
5580575 | Unger et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582578 | Zhong et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590657 | Cain et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5617862 | Cole et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5648098 | Porter | Jul 1997 | A |
5666954 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676452 | Scholz | Oct 1997 | A |
5676692 | Sanghvi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678554 | Hossack et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694936 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695460 | Siegel et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717657 | Ruffa | Feb 1998 | A |
5724972 | Petrofsky | Mar 1998 | A |
5743863 | Chapelon | Apr 1998 | A |
5753929 | Bliss | May 1998 | A |
5759162 | Oppelt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766138 | Rattner | Jun 1998 | A |
5769790 | Watkins et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797848 | Marian et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5823962 | Schaetzle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827204 | Grandia et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5836896 | Rosenschein | Nov 1998 | A |
5849727 | Porter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5873902 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5879314 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5932807 | Mallart | Aug 1999 | A |
5947904 | Hossack et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6001069 | Tachibana et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022309 | Celliers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036667 | Manna et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088613 | Unger | Jul 2000 | A |
6093883 | Sanghvi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113558 | Rosenschein et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126607 | Whitmore et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128958 | Cain | Oct 2000 | A |
6143018 | Beuthan et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6176842 | Tachibana et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6308585 | Nilsson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308710 | Silva | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309355 | Cain et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318146 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321109 | Ben-Haim et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6338566 | Verdier | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344489 | Spears | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6391020 | Kurtz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413216 | Cain et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419648 | Vitek et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470204 | Uzgiris et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488639 | Ribault et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490469 | Candy | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500141 | Irion et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506154 | Ezion et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506171 | Vitek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508774 | Acker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511428 | Azuma et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511444 | Hynynen et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6522142 | Freundlich | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524251 | Rabiner et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556750 | Constantino et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559644 | Froundlich et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6576220 | Unger | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6599288 | Maguire et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607498 | Eshel | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612988 | Maor et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6613004 | Vitek et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6613005 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6626854 | Friedman et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626855 | Weng et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645162 | Friedman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648839 | Manna et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6666833 | Friedman et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685640 | Fry et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6685657 | Jones | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705994 | Vortman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719449 | Laugharn, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6719694 | Weng et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6735461 | Vitek et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6736814 | Manna et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750463 | Riley | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770031 | Hynynen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775438 | Gaedke et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788977 | Fenn et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790180 | Vitek | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6820160 | Allman | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6852082 | Strickberger et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869439 | White et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6929609 | Asafusa | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7004282 | Manna et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7059168 | Hibi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7128711 | Medan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128719 | Rosenberg | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7175596 | Vitek et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7196313 | Quinones | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7223239 | Schulze et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7258674 | Cribbs et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273458 | Prausnitz et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7273459 | Desilets et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7300414 | Holland et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7311679 | Desilets et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7331951 | Eshel et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7341569 | Soltani et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347855 | Eshel et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358226 | Dayton et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359640 | Onde et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7367948 | O'Donnell et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374551 | Liang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7377900 | Vitek et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7442168 | Novak et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7462488 | Madsen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7559905 | Kagosaki et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7656638 | Laakso et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
20010039420 | Burbank et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041163 | Sugita et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020045890 | Celliers et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078964 | Kovac et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099356 | Unger et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030092982 | Eppstein | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112922 | Burdette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149352 | Liang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157025 | Unger et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181833 | Faragalla et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199857 | Eizenhofer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221561 | Milo | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040127815 | Marchitto et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138563 | Moehring et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236248 | Svedman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243021 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038339 | Chauhan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038361 | Zhong et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050152561 | Spencer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154314 | Quistgaard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050283098 | Conston et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060060991 | Holsteyns et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074303 | Chornenky et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060206028 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241466 | Ottoboni et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060241523 | Sinelnikov et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264760 | Liu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293630 | Manna et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010805 | Fedewa et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016039 | Vortman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070065420 | Johnson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083120 | Cain et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070161902 | Dan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167764 | Hynynen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070205785 | Nilsson | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219448 | Seip et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080013593 | Kawabata | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080055003 | Unnikrishnan et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082026 | Schmidt et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080126665 | Burr et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080214964 | Chapelon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262345 | Fichtinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262486 | Zvuloni et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080312561 | Chauhan | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319356 | Cain et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030339 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090112098 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090177085 | Maxwell et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198094 | Fenster et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211587 | Lawrentschuk | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090227874 | Suri et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100011845 | Laugharn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100069797 | Cain et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100125225 | Gelbart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100163694 | Fadler et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100261994 | Davalos et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100286519 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317971 | Fan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110118602 | Weng et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110172529 | Gertner | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110178444 | Slayton et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110251528 | Canney et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120010541 | Cain et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029353 | Slayton et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120130288 | Holland et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120189998 | Kruecker et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130053691 | Kawabata et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130090579 | Cain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130102932 | Cain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130190623 | Bertolina et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130303906 | Cain et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140073995 | Teofilovic et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140100459 | Xu et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3220751 | Dec 1983 | DE |
3544628 | Jun 1987 | DE |
3817094 | Nov 1989 | DE |
0017382 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0320303 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0332871 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0384831 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0755653 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1504713 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2099582 | Dec 1982 | GB |
60-80779 | May 1985 | JP |
61-196718 | Aug 1986 | JP |
HEI 2-215451 | Aug 1990 | JP |
HEI 6-197907 | Jul 1994 | JP |
HEI 7-504339 | May 1995 | JP |
08-84740 | Apr 1996 | JP |
06-304178 | May 1996 | JP |
08-131454 | May 1996 | JP |
HEI 10-512447 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2003-510159 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2004-505660 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2007520307 | Jul 2007 | JP |
2010029650 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2004-512502 | Apr 2014 | JP |
WO9406355 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 0232506 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 2008051484 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2011092683 | Aug 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Hall et al.; Imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction (histotripsy) in ultrasound surgery; IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium, Sep. 18-21, 2005, pp. 1732-1734. |
Cain, Charles A.; Histrotripsy: controlled mechanical sub-division of soft tissues by high intensity pulsed ultrasound (conference presentation); International Symposium on Therapeutic Ultrasound; pp. T005; 2005. |
Hall et al.; Ultrasound imaging feedback of tissue liquefaction in ultrasound surgery; Ultrasonics Symposium; IEEE; vol. 3; pp. 1732-1734; Sep. 18-21, 2005. |
Parsons et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy for controlled tissue homogenization; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 32; pp. 115-129; 2006. |
Roberts et al.; Pulsed cavitational ultrasound: a noninvasive technology for controlled tissue ablation (histotripsy) in the rabbit kidney; Journal of Urology; vol. 175; pp. 734-738; 2006. |
Xu et al.; A new strategy to enhance cavitational tissue erosion by using a high intensity initiating sequence; IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Freq Control; vol. 53; pp. 1412-1424; 2006. |
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion: the role of dynamic interaction between insonation and microbubble activity; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 117; pp. 424-435; 2005. |
Xu et al.; Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion; IEEE Transaction on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control; vol. 51; pp. 726-736; 2004. |
Xu et al.; Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy); Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 122; pp. 229-236; 2007. |
Xu et al.; High Speed Imaging of Bubble Clouds Generated in Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitational Therapy'Histotripsy; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; ; vol. 54; No. 10; pp. 2091R2101; Oct. 2007. |
Xu et al.; Investigation of intensity threshold for ultrasound tissue erosion; Ultrasound in Med. & Biol.; vol. 31; pp. 1673-1682; 2005. |
Xu et al.; Optical and acoustic monitoring of bubble cloud dynamics at a tissue-fluid interface in ultrasound tissue erosion; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 121; pp. 2421-2430; 2007. |
Hall et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,768 entitled “Micromanipulator Control Arm for Therapeutic and Imaging Ultrasound Transducers,” filed Aug. 26, 2010. |
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,775 entitled “Devices and Methods for Using Controlled Bubble Cloud Cavitation in Fractionating Urinary Stones,” filed Aug. 26, 2010. |
Cain et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/887,705 entitled “Gel phantoms for testing cavitational ultrasound (histotripsy) transducers,” filed Sep. 22, 2010. |
Appel et al.; Stereoscopic highspeed recording of bubble filaments; Ultrasonics Sonochemistry; vol. 11(1); pp. 39-42; Jan. 2004. |
Atchley et al.; Thresholds for cavitation produced in water by pulsed ultrasound; Ultrasonics.; vol. 26(5); pp. 280-285; Sep. 1988. |
Bland et al.; Surgical Oncology; McGraw Hill; Chap. 5 (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator); pp. 461-462; Jan. 29, 2001. |
Burdin et al.; Implementation of the laser diffraction technique for cavitation bubble investigations; Particle & Particle Systems Characterization; vol. 19; pp. 73-83; May 2002. |
Holland et al.; Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment; J. Acoust. Soc. Am.; vol. 88(5); pp. 2059-2069; Nov. 1990. |
Huber et al.; Influence of shock wave pressure amplitude and pulse repetition frequency on the lifespan, size and No. Of transient cavities in the field of an electromagnetic lithotripter; Physics in Medicine and Biology; vol. 43 (10); pp. 3113-3128; Oct. 1998. |
Lauterborn et al.; Cavitation bubble dynamics studied by high speed photography and holography: part one; Ultrasonics; vol. 23; pp. 260-268; Nov. 1985. |
Miller et al.; A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective; Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology; vol. 22; pp. 1131-1154; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 1996. |
Ohl et al.; Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence; Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A; vol. 357; pp. 269-294; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 1999. |
Pishchalnikov et al.; Cavitation Bubble Cluster Activity in the Breakage of Kidney Stones by Lithotripter Shock Waves; J Endourol.; 17(7): 435-446; Sep. 2003. |
Porter et al.; Reduction in left ventricular cavitary attenuation and improvement in posterior myocardial contrast . . . ; J Am Soc Echocardiography; pp. 437-441; Jul.-Aug. 1996. |
Roy et al.; A precise technique for the measurement of acoustic cavitation thresholds and some preliminary results; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 78(5); pp. 1799-805; Nov. 1985. |
Sapozhnikov et al.; Ultrasound-Guided Localized Detection of Cavitation During Lithotripsy in Pig Kidney in Vivo; IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, vol. 2; pp. 1347-1350; Oct. 7-10, 2001. |
Sokolov et al.; Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field; Journal of the Acoustical Society of America; vol. 110(3); pp. 1685-1695; Sep. 2001. |
Teofilovic, Dejan; U.S. Appl. No. 13/446,783 entitled “Systems and Methods for Obtaining Large Creepage Isolation on Printed Boards,” filed Apr. 13, 2012. |
Cain, Charles A.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/570,708 entitled “Lesion Generation Through Bone Using Histotripsy Therapy Without Aberration Correction,” filed Aug. 9, 2012. |
Akiyama et al.; Elliptically curved acoustic lens for emitting strongly focused finite-amplitude beams: Application of the spheroidal beam equation model to the theoretical prediction; Acoustical Science and Technology, vol. 26, pp. 279-284, May 2005. |
Canney et al.; Shock-Induced Heating and Millisecond Boiling in Gels and Tissue Due to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 36, pp. 250-267; Feb. 2010 (author manuscript). |
Chan et al.; An image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound device for uterine fibroids treatment; Medical Physics, vol. 29, pp. 2611-2620, Nov. 2002. |
Clement et al.; A hemisphere array for non-invasive ultrasound brain therapy and surgery; Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 45, p. 3707-3719, Dec. 2000. |
Desilets et al.; The Design of Efficient Broad-Band Piezoelectric Transducers; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 25, pp. 115-125, May 1978. |
Giannatsis et al.; Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review; The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 40(1-2); pp. 116-127; Jan. 2009. |
Gudra et al.; Influence of acoustic impedance of multilayer acoustic systems on the transfer function of ultrasonic airborne transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 40, pp. 457-463, May 2002. |
Hall et al.; A Low Cost Compact 512 Channel Therapeutic Ultrasound System for Transcutaneous Ultrasound Surgery; AIP Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA; vol. 829, pp. 445-449, Oct. 27-29, 2005. |
Hall et al.; Histotripsy of the prostate: dose effects in a chronic canine model; Urology; 74(4); pp. 932-937; Oct. 2009 (author manuscript). |
Hartmann; Ultrasonic properties of poly(4-methyl pentene-1), Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 51, pp. 310-314, Jan. 1980. |
Kim et al.; Dependence of particle volume fraction on sound velocity and attenuation of EPDM composites; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 177-183, Feb. 2007. |
Krimholtz et al.; New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers; Electronics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 398-399, Jun. 1970. |
Lake et al.; Histotripsy: minimally invasive technology for prostatic tissue ablation in an in vivo canine model; Urology; 72(3); pp. 682-686; Sep. 2008. |
Lensing et al.; Deep-vein thrombosis; The Lancet, vol. 353, pp. 479-485, Feb. 6, 1999. |
Manes et al.; Design of a Simplified Delay System for Ultrasound Phased Array Imaging; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 350-354, Nov. 1983. |
Maréchal et al; Effect of Radial Displacement of Lens on Response of Focused Ultrasonic Transducer; Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 46, p. 3077-3085; May 15, 2007. |
Maréchal et al; Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model; Ultrasonics, vol. 46, pp. 155-167, May 2007. |
Martin et al.; Water-cooled, high-intensity ultrasound surgical applicators with frequency tracking; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, pp. 1305-1317, Oct. 2003. |
Maxwell et al.; Noninvasive Thrombolysis Using Pulsed Ultrasound Cavitation Therapy—Histotripsy; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 35, pp. 1982-1994, Dec. 2009 (author manuscript). |
Parsons et al.; Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields; The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, pp. 1432-1440, Mar. 2006. |
Rosenschein et al.; Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Noninvasive Ultrasound Thrombolysis: Preclinical Results; Circulation; vol. 102; pp. 238-245, Jul. 11, 2000. |
Sato et al.; Experimental Investigation of Phased Array Using Tapered Matching Layers. 2002 IEEE Ultrasound Symposium. vol. 2; pp. 1235-1238, Oct. 2002. |
Simonin et al.; Characterization of heterogeneous structure in a polymer object manufactured by stereolithography with low-frequency microechography; Journal of Materials Chemistry; vol. 6, pp. 1595-1599, Sep. 1996. |
Song et al.; Feasibility of Using Lateral Mode Coupling Method for a Large Scale Ultrasound Phased Array for Noninvasive Transcranial Therapy; Biomedical Engineering; IEEE Transactions on, vol. 57, pp. 124-133; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript). |
Souquet et al.; Design of Low-Loss Wide-Band Ultrasonic Transducers for Noninvasive Medical Application; Sonics and Ultrasonics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 26, pp. 75-80, Mar. 1979. |
Toda; Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 49, pp. 299-306, Mar. 2002. |
Van Kervel et al.; A calculation scheme for the optimum design of ultrasonic transducers; Ultrasonics, vol. 21, pp. 134-140, May 1983. |
Wang et al.; Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy; Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 56, pp. 995-1005, May 2009 (author manuscript). |
Yan et al.; A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems; Computer-Aided Design, vol. 28, pp. 307-318, Apr. 1996. |
Hall et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/874,083 entitled “Ultrasound Transducer Manufacturing Using Rapid-Prototyping Method,” filed Apr. 30, 2013. |
Avago Technologies; ACNV2601 High Insulation Voltage 10 MBd Digital Opotcoupler. Avago Technologies Data Sheet; pp. 1-11; Jul. 29, 2010. |
Aschoff et al.; How does alteration of hepatic blood flow affect liver perfusion and radiofrequency-induced thermal lesion size in rabbit liver?; J Magn Reson Imaging; 13(1); pp. 57-63; Jan. 2001. |
Cline et al.; Magnetic resonance-guided thermal surgery; Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 30(1); pp. 98-106; Jul. 1993. |
Curiel et al.; Elastography for the follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound prostate cancer treatment: Initial comparison with MRI; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 31(11); pp. 1461-1468; Nov. 2005. |
Emelianov et al.; Triplex ultrasound: Elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis; Ultrasound Med Biol; 28(6); pp. 757-767; Jun. 2002. |
Hynynen et al.; Tissue thermometry during ultrasound exposure; European Urology; 23(Suppl 1); pp. 12-16; 1993 (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filed and any foreign priority date) |
Kallel et al.; The feasibility of elastographic visualization of HIFU-induced thermal lesions in soft tissues: Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 25(4); pp. 641-647; May 1999. |
Konofagou; Quo vadis elasticity imaging?; Ultrasonics; 42(1-9); pp. 331-336; Apr. 2004. |
Kruse et al.; Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: Preliminary results; Phys. Med. Biol; 45(6); pp. 1579-1590; Jun. 2000. |
Liu et al.; Real-time 2-D temperature imaging using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 57(1); pp. 12-16; Jan. 2010 (author manuscript, 16 pgs.). |
Liu et al.; Viscoelastic property measurement in thin tissue constructs using ultrasound; IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 55(2); pp. 368-383; Feb. 2008 (author manuscript, 37 pgs.). |
Nightingale et al.; Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force; Ultrasound Med Biol; 32(1); pp. 61-72; Jan. 2006. |
Okada et al.; A case of hepatocellular carcinoma treated by MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation with respiratory gating; Magn Reson Med Sci; 5(3); pp. 167-171; Oct. 2006. |
Rowland et al.; MRI study of hepatic tumours following high intensity focused ultrasound surgery; British Journal of Radiology; 70; pp. 144-153; Feb. 1997. |
Sapareto et al.; Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy; Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 10(6); pp. 787-800; Apr. 1984. |
Souchon et al.; Visualisation of HIFU lesions using elastography of the human prostate in vivo: Preliminary results; Ultrasound Med. Biol; 29(7); pp. 1007-1015; Jul. 2003. |
Xie et al.; Correspondence of ultrasound elasticity imaging to direct mechanical measurement in aging DVT in rats; Ultrasound Med Biol; 31(10); pp. 1351-1359; Oct. 2005 (author manuscript, 20 pgs.). |
Zheng et al.; An acoustic backscatter-based method for localization of lesions induced by high-intensity focused ultrasound; Ultrasound Med Biol; 36(4); pp. 610-622; Apr. 2010. |
Bjoerk et al.; Cool/MOS CP—How to make most beneficial use of the generation of super junction technology devices. Infineon Technologies AG. Feb. 2007 [retrieved Feb. 4, 2014] from the internet (http://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infineon+-+Application+Note+-+PowerMOSFETs+-+600V+CoolMOS%E284%A2+-+CP+Most+beneficial+use+of+superjunction+technologie+devices.pdf?folderld=db3a304412b407950112b408e8c90004&fileld=db3a304412b407950112b40ac9a40688>pp. 1, 4, 14. |
Therapeutic Ultrasound Group. Non-invasive Ultrasonic Tissue Fraction for Treatment of Benign Disease and Cancer—“Histotripsy”. University research [online]. Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Michigan. Jul. 2011[retrieved on Jan. 28, 2014] from the internet: (http://web.archive.org/web/20110720091822/http://www.histotripsy.umich.edu/index.html>.entiredocument). |
Avtech; AVR-8 Data sheet; May 23, 2004; 3 pages; retrieved from the internet (http//www.avtechpulse.com). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110040190 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61234559 | Aug 2009 | US |