The present invention relates generally to the field of safety apparel, and more specifically to safety garments for use in various environments, including for example environments containing actual or potential radiological, biological, or light-splash hazards, the apparel having, in various embodiments, reduced particulate shedding properties, attachment facilities, reinforced points of wear or contact contamination risk, and ease-of-safe-removal characteristics.
Safety garments, such as disposable smocks, jumpsuits, gloves, shoe coverings, and hair coverings, are required apparel for the performance of many jobs. Some of the jobs requiring safety garments are performed in clean room environments, wherein the introduction of foreign matter must be minimized. For example, technicians in certain sensitive medical fields dealing with infectious matter, aerospace researchers assembling interplanetary probes, and material scientists developing and manufacturing ultra-pure materials all wear safety garments in clean room environments. The safety garments in some situations perform the dual function of protecting the wearer from the potentially hazardous materials he is working with as well as preventing unwanted matter from the wearer's person from contaminating his work product. In other situations, safety garments protect the worker from exposure to dangerous materials, such as radioactive, chemical, and biological hazards.
Safety garments for use in clean room environments are typically made from nonwoven disposable materials, such as from sheets of spunbond/melt blown/melt blown/spunbond (SMMS) material and the like. Such sheets of material are cut into patterns and stitched together to form desired safety apparel. Typically, as these garments are intended to be disposable and the focus is on their functionality and not aesthetic appeal, little attention is paid to the hemming and stitching. The “as cut” edges are thus exposed. However, in clean room environments where contaminant levels in the parts per million or even parts per billion would be too high, such exposed cut edges present genuine sources of potential particulate contamination.
Moreover, as these garments are intended to be disposable, little effort is made to provide durable stitching. The prevalent attitude is that a garment intended to be worn for just a few hours does not require superior stitching. However, in a clean room situation or a hazardous environment such as asbestos remediation or nuclear demolition and decontamination, seam separation is not only a potential source of particulate evolution in and of itself, but also produces a pathway from the exterior to the interior of the garment through which potentially hazardous material may flow.
Many workplace environments from industrial settings to hospitals hold the potential to expose workers to various types of radiation. One problem faced by workers in such environments is how to safely perform tasks while monitoring their exposure to potentially harmful radiation. Often such protective measures include the use of personal radiation measuring devices referred to as “dosimeters” along with protective garments.
Traditionally, personal dosimeters have been attached to a worker's protective garments using tape or some other improvised means. Under normal working conditions, such informal attachment methods often lead to the detachment and potential loss or damage to the dosimeter device. Additionally, such protective garments are often bulky and difficult to remove safely when they are no longer needed.
In addition, while most protective apparel is used with full-faced respirators to safeguard against respiratory particulate or chemical vapor inhalation in environments where minor skin contamination is not a major health issue, but presents an inconvenience (e.g., spray painting), radiological workers must maintain a contamination-free environment inside the protective “envelope” of their protective clothing and guard against contamination while doffing the protective clothing after the work in a contaminated zone is completed. Hence, they cannot overlook any types of gaps or openings to the suit.
Heretofore the solution to bridging the gap typically formed by the closed zipper and hood underneath the chin and respirator has been to apply layers of duct, vinyl, masking or other tapes over the gap and surrounding the respirator mask to ensure a tight seal. This requires a safety professional to conduct audits of personnel entering contamination areas to ensure adequate application of the tape and correct positioning. It also requires skillful and careful removal of the contaminated tape around the bare neck upon exiting the contaminated work area while the personnel are still wearing potentially contaminated protective gloves, and risks exposing the worker's neck to that cross-contamination, creating a Personal Contamination Event (PCE) that may risk the worker's health and have to be reported to a regulatory agency.
Traditional designs for this level of protective apparel account for a large portion of accidental self-contamination or PCEs each year. Even if a front zipper is closed to the end of its travel path, and the hood is applied over the head and around the face, many of those designs leave a gap in the neck area below the chin. Often, tape is wrapped around the respirator or other face mask to cover that gap. When the person is wearing a respirator, this gap can easily allow contaminants against the skin, which in radiological or biological environments is considered a recordable accident by the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA). Safe removal of the apparel is often challenging, sometimes requiring a partner or observer and/or a mirror to help the wearer find the end of the tape to begin the sequence of doffing the hood and respirator, running the risk of self-contamination.
There thus remains a need for an improved safety garment that is more durable and less prone to particulate shedding. There is also a need for protective garments to which personal dosimeter devices and other monitoring equipment can be effectively attached, as well as a garment that can be removed quickly, safely, and easily, and withstands high-wear regions such as elbows and knees. There is a further need for garments that protect the wearer from radiological, environmental, and other contaminants, both during exposure and during doffing of the garment. The present disclosure addresses these needs.
One aspect of the present disclosure relates to a safety garment. Some embodiments include at least one sheet of nonwoven fabric having at least one cut edge, a plurality of stitches formed in the sheet(s) of nonwoven fabric to define a garment; and hemming formed at cut edges. The nonwoven fabric is preferably formed from spunbond/melt blown material. The stitching is characterized by an optimized stitch density of between ten and twelve stitches per inch. The garment includes at least one attachment feature for holding or attaching one or more dosimeters to the garment. These may be positioned to allow the wearer to grasp them and tear open certain seams, partially or completely open a zipper, or otherwise remove the garment. In various embodiments, the garment also includes an improved neck closure that simplifies donning of the garment and aids the wearer's effort to doff the suit while avoiding self-contamination events. Some embodiments have reinforced knees and elbows for additional protection against contact with hazardous materials.
One object of the present invention is to provide an improved safety garment. An object of some embodiments is to facilitate doffing of the garment with a reduced risk of contaminating oneself. Related objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the disclosure and presenting its currently understood best mode of operation, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, with such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated embodiments and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art.
In practice, the garments 10 and 14 are often made by cutting one or more sheets of nonwoven material into a desired safety garment pattern. Simple patterns (e.g., shoe coverings) may require a single sheet; more complex patterns (e.g., smocks, jumpsuits, and the like) may require two or more sheets of varying size. The sheet(s) is/are then stitched together to define a garment 10. The edges of the garment 10 are then hemmed. All cut edges are twice folded and hemmed under to prevent exposure of any cut edges that could increase the likelihood of particulate shedding. All stitching in these illustrative embodiments is characterized by a stitch density in the range of 10 to 12 stitches per inch.
The loops of the embodiments of
Garment 110 is accessible through opening 146, which is held closed using a closure means 150 shown in greater detail in
Garment 110 can be made from a non-woven material such as polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester materials, and the like, including combinations of two or more non-woven materials. Such materials may be manufactured using spunbond/melt blown/melt blown/spunbond (SMMS) techniques, spunbond/melt blown/spunbond (SMS) techniques, or other suitable techniques for manufacturing non-woven garments, and may include two or more layers of material and/or multiple layers of different materials, as desired. The seams 116 located at various points about the garment 110 are optionally double-folded under so as not to be exposed. The seams 116 are also stitched with an optimized number of stitches per inch (SPI) increased to 10-12 SPI over 6-8 SPI, which is the industry standard. A stitch density of 10-12 SPI has been found to be optimal, as more than 12 SPI weakens the non-woven material via excessive perforation and less than 10 SPI provides a looser and weaker hem, such that particulate shedding is not minimized. Optionally, seams 16 are formed using some other method such as sonic welding or binding with welting or other materials.
Continuing with the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment of the disclosed technology, garment 110 is constructed such that one or more closures (zippers, adhesives, etc.) are designed to open, rip, or tear when a force above a predetermined threshold is applied. Such “tear-open” garments are designed so as to allow for easy removal of a garment when it is no longer needed. Tear-open garments allow workers to quickly, safely, and easily remove a garment at the end of a shift, for example. Attachment features 130 are optionally positioned so as to allow a wearer to grasp one or more of them and strong enough such that pulling on the attachment features 130 causes the tear-open closures to at least begin to open, thereby allowing the worker to quickly, safely, and easily remove the garment 110. Alternatively, a garment 110 according to another embodiment of the disclosed technology will open at the closure means 150 when sufficient force is applied by the wearer to the attachment features 130, thereby allowing the wearer to remove the garment 110.
Portions of garment 110 likely to experience wear such as the knees and elbows may include reinforced portions 140, 145 to preclude seepage or bleed-through of contamination in the event the wearer leans or kneels in contaminated environments. Reinforced portions 140, 145 may be made from the same material as garment 110 or from a different, stronger material. Optionally, garment 110 may be made from two or more layer of material. Reinforced portions 140, 145 may be attached to the interior or exterior surface of garment 110 and may be attached using adhesives, stitching, or any other suitable attachment method. Garment 110 may also include one or more pockets 135 located about the garment as desired.
Continuing with the embodiment shown in
Turning to the embodiment shown in
The loose edge 245 of flap 240 in some embodiments is secured to body 220 and hood 210 by a two-part closure device 247, which might be one-time-closable, reopenable, and/or repositionable closure device. In some embodiments, two-part closure device 247 is adhesive-based, such as a peel-and-stick adhesive strip, where adhesive is on either the flap 240 or the body 220/hood 210, and the other (the body 220/hood 210 or the flap 240, respectively) includes a landing zone to which the adhesive adheres well. In other embodiments, two-part closure device 247 is a hook-and-loop closure, with a region of hook material on the flap 240 and a region of loop material on body 220/hood 210. Other alternative two-part closure devices include buttons, slide closures, snaps, adhesive tape strips, and the like.
In use, the wearer of suit 200 typically dons a respirator or air mask, then suit 200. After she puts her legs and arms in the legs 260 and arms 270 of suit 200, she puts the hood 210 over her head and closes zipper 230 up to edge 213 of face opening 215. She closes flap 240, securing flap 240 to the hood 210 and body 220 using two-part closure device 247. In the illustrated embodiment, the extra fabric around the neck area and under the chin relative to other embodiments and suits, in combination with elastic embedded in the hood edge 213, allows the edge 213 of the hood 210 to fully surround the perimeter of the respirator without the need to seal the edge 213 to the respirator by mechanical or adhesive means to produce an occlusive seal. In other embodiments, tape or other means are used to secure edge 213 to the mask or respirator. In some embodiments, there is elastic around edge 213 that has a stretched (vertical), or open, diameter and a contracted, or closed, diameter that fits around a face mask or respirator. In some embodiments, the open diameter of face opening 215 is less than about 15 inches. In preferred embodiments, the open diameter is less than about 10 inches, while in more preferred embodiments, the closed diameter is less than about 7 inches.
To remove garment 200, the wearer opens at least the top of two-part closure device 247 and pulls doffing loops 250. In some embodiments, this begins to open zipper 230, and the wearer opens it the rest of the way, while in other embodiments zipper 230 is manually opened without the assistance of doffing loops 250. In some embodiments, the wearer pulls on a doffing loop 275 to remove her arm from each sleeve, including pulling her hand through the elastic band 273 at each wrist. The wearer preferably removes all of garment 200 using the “inside-out” method, containing all “outside” surfaces of the garment 200 that had been exposed to actual or potential contamination within the inside-out garment 200 and disposing of it appropriately.
In yet another embodiment, the neck flap is extended and includes an extra closure device, while the hood bears additional doffing loops as illustrated in
In still another embodiment, shown in
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the features of each illustrated embodiment can be mixed and matched, tweaked and adapted as needed or desired. Particular embodiments may or may not include, for example, features corresponding to double-folded and hemmed edges or bound seam 12; stitch density of 10-12 SPI; hand-engaging loops 30; integrated hand or foot coverings; reinforced elbows and knees; attachment features 130; tear-away seams; zipper 230; doffing loops 250, 275, or 355; two-part closure devices 247, 385/390, or 485/490; limited or broad landing areas 390 and 490; elastic cuffs 263, 273; and grasping tab 487. The flap that covers the neck may be short as illustrated on garment 400, or may be long as illustrated in garment 200.
While the disclosed technology has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It is understood that the embodiments have been shown and described in the foregoing specification in satisfaction of the best mode and enablement requirements. It is also understood that one of ordinary skill in the art could readily make a near infinite number of insubstantial changes and modifications to the above-described embodiments, and that it would be impractical to attempt to describe all such variations in the present specification. Accordingly, it is understood that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the disclosed technology are desired to be protected.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/243,282, filed Sep. 23, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/192,097, filed Aug. 14, 2008 (now abandoned), which is a nonprovisional of U.S. Provisional App. No. 60/955,718, filed Aug. 14, 2007, and was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/428,728, filed Jul. 5, 2006 (now abandoned), which was a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/798,646, filed Mar. 11, 2004 (now abandoned), the entireties of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. Any disclaimer that may have occurred during the prosecution of the above-identified applications is hereby expressly rescinded.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2668294 | Gilpin | Feb 1954 | A |
3179955 | Worth | Apr 1965 | A |
3381440 | Hullhorst | May 1968 | A |
3382643 | Hullhorst | May 1968 | A |
3486470 | Florczak | Dec 1969 | A |
3499261 | Hullhorst | Mar 1970 | A |
3773200 | Morris | Nov 1973 | A |
3775933 | Prescott et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3776372 | Lemelson | Dec 1973 | A |
3782309 | Lee | Jan 1974 | A |
3798874 | Lemelson | Mar 1974 | A |
3906878 | Burton | Sep 1975 | A |
3949130 | Sabee et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4041203 | Brock et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4066025 | Speer | Jan 1978 | A |
4106120 | Zurbrigg et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4272851 | Goldstein | Jun 1981 | A |
4286439 | Pasternack | Sep 1981 | A |
4324087 | Mitchell et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4408438 | Rewitzer | Oct 1983 | A |
4448138 | Freermann | May 1984 | A |
4491079 | Gustavsson | Jan 1985 | A |
4512464 | Sylvester | Apr 1985 | A |
4517714 | Sneed et al. | May 1985 | A |
4525407 | Ness | Jun 1985 | A |
4546497 | Ono et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4613640 | Deisler et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4624200 | Fisher | Nov 1986 | A |
4648336 | Ragnebring | Mar 1987 | A |
4655760 | Morman et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4670073 | Langley | Jun 1987 | A |
4670913 | Morell et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683593 | Langley | Aug 1987 | A |
4688566 | Boyce | Aug 1987 | A |
4689831 | Greenberger et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4753182 | Blackburn | Jun 1988 | A |
4757669 | Areblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4818597 | DaPonte et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4848222 | Fleissner | Jul 1989 | A |
4860382 | Markwell | Aug 1989 | A |
4928611 | Ogawa | May 1990 | A |
4932078 | Jones et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938817 | Langley | Jul 1990 | A |
4998296 | Stames | Mar 1991 | A |
5003902 | Benstock et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5005216 | Blackburn et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5042227 | Merry | Aug 1991 | A |
5119515 | Altinger | Jun 1992 | A |
5150660 | Kuczynski | Sep 1992 | A |
5165353 | Freermann | Nov 1992 | A |
5172629 | Merry | Dec 1992 | A |
5188885 | Timmons et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5229181 | Daiber et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5309828 | Merry | May 1994 | A |
5417912 | Merry | May 1995 | A |
5447012 | Kovacs et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5492753 | Levy et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493730 | Vo-Dinh | Feb 1996 | A |
5511246 | Farkas et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5524531 | Merry | Jun 1996 | A |
5564356 | Reinders | Oct 1996 | A |
5620098 | Boos et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5690537 | Kalmus | Nov 1997 | A |
5692606 | Elmaleh | Dec 1997 | A |
5784717 | Singer | Jul 1998 | A |
5815834 | Bronson | Oct 1998 | A |
5878551 | Curley et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5934470 | Bauer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5991921 | Saito | Nov 1999 | A |
5996320 | Todd et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6038699 | Han et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047413 | Welchel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6117515 | Brunson et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6235660 | Bhattacharjee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6378136 | Matsushita | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6435116 | Ribble et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6854135 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7203974 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7651653 | Morman et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7699195 | Scott | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8621669 | Yadav et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20010032346 | Matsushita et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034891 | Matsushita | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041487 | Brady et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020046549 | O'Connor et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046550 | O'Connor et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020100107 | Shin | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030166369 | De Leon et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030226196 | Grilliot | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229936 | Tremblay-Lutter et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006815 | Carroll | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040060649 | Van Gompel et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107473 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118505 | Shimakawa et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050050608 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050188907 | D'Henin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198726 | Yadav et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060026731 | Qashou | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060081489 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060096003 | Plaatje et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060117598 | Czaplewski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131783 | Morman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150305 | Plut | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20090019616 | Smith et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090126088 | Yadav et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100257661 | Yadav et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000317165 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2006002311 | Jan 2006 | JP |
WO0122842 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,646, Restriction Requirement May 9, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,646, Response to Restriction Requirement Jun. 13, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,646, Non-Final Office Action Aug. 25, 2005. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,646, Response to Non-Final Office Action Jan. 26, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,646, Response to Non-Final Office Action Feb. 17, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/798,646, Final Office Action Mar. 6, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/801,046, Non-Final Office Action Sep. 26, 2006. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Non-Final Office Action Jan. 14, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Response to Non-Final Office Action Apr. 14, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Final Office Action Jun. 16, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Response to Final Office Action Sep. 16, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Advisory Action Nov. 19, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Request for Continued Examination Dec. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Final Office Action Jan. 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Notice of Restarted Response Period Feb. 2, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Request for Continued Examination May 4, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Non-Final Office Action May 23, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,097, Interview Summary—Examiner Initiated Dec. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,728, Restriction Requirement Aug. 2, 2007. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,728, Response to Restriction Requirement Jan. 31, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,728, Non-Final Office Action Mar. 18, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,728, Response to Non-Final Office Action Sep. 18, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,728, Final Office Action Nov. 12, 2008. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/428,728, Examiner Interview Summary Feb. 5, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,842, Non-Final Rejection Nov. 18, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/422,842, Examiner Interview Summary May 17, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Non-Final Rejection Dec. 10, 2010. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Examiner Interview Summary May 9, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Response to Non-Final Office Action May 10, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708 Final Office Action Jul. 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708 Notice of Appeal Oct. 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Request for Pre-Appeal Conference Oct. 13, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Appeals Conference Reopen Prosecution Feb. 1, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Non-Final Office Action Mar. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary Aug. 3, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Response to Non-Final Office Action Sep. 7, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/406,708, Non-Final Office Action Nov. 23, 2012. |
Application No. PCT/US2012/056627, International Search Report and Written Opinion Jan. 17, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/243,282, Non-Final Office Action Feb. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/243,282, Applicant Initiated Interview Summary May 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/243,282, Response to Non-Final Office Action Jul. 12, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/243,282, Notice of Allowance Sep. 3, 2013. |
Application No. PCT/US2012/056627, International Preliminary Report on Patentability Apr. 3, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140173814 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60955718 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13243282 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14108766 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12192097 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 13243282 | US | |
Parent | 11428728 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12192097 | US | |
Parent | 10798646 | Mar 2004 | US |
Child | 11428728 | US |