Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF) is a separation process that uses membranes to separate components in a liquid solution or suspension on the basis of size or molecule weight differences. Applications include concentration, clarification, and desalting of proteins and other biomolecules such as nucleotides, antigens, and monoclonal antibodies; buffer exchange; process development; membrane selection studies; pre-chromatographic clarification to remove colloidal particles; depyrogenation of small molecules such as dextrose and antibiotics; harvesting, washing or clarification of cell cultures, lysates, colloidal suspensions and viral cultures; and sample preparation.
In TFF, the solution or suspension to be filtered is passed across the surface of the membrane in a cross-flow mode. The driving force for filtration is the transmembrane pressure, usually created with a peristaltic pump. The velocity at which the filtrate is passed across the membrane surface also controls the filtration rate and helps prevent clogging of the membrane. Because TFF recirculates retentate across the membrane surface, membrane fouling is minimized, a high filtration rate is maintained, and product recovery is enhanced.
Conventional TFF devices are formed of a plurality of elements, including a pump, a feed solution reservoir, a filtration module and conduits for connecting these elements. In use, the feed solution is directed from the feed solution reservoir to the filtration module while the retentate from the filtration module is recirculated from the filtration module to the feed solution reservoir until the desired volume of retentate is obtained. The membrane is sandwiched between top and bottom manifolds or holders, which serve to provide accurate mechanical constraint against the internal hydraulic pressure of the device, and also serve to distribute the filtration stream across the multiple flow paths within the device. These manifolds or holders are typically made of stainless steel and must be cleaned and validated prior to each use, particularly in biopharmaceutical and other sanitary applications. This is an expensive and time-consuming process.
It would be desirable to provide a filtration device that eliminates the need for the aforementioned cleaning and validation steps when replacing the filtration medium.
In accordance with the present teachings, a tangential flow filtration device is provided wherein liners are provided between the filtration element and the top and bottom holders or manifolds. The liners incorporate the flow channels and inlet and outlet ports that were previously present in the manifolds. The liners are made of an inexpensive material and therefore are disposable after a single use, making it more cost effective to dispose of them than to clean the conventional manifolds. In addition, the liners can be pre-sterilized. In order to provide sufficient strength and rigidity under operating conditions, the liners have a grid pattern of ribs that abut the holder plates to help prevent the liners from torquing under clamping force.
Turning first to
Positioned beneath holder plate 12 in the assembled state is disposable liner 16. The liner 16 is preferably made of inexpensive material, suitable for the application, that is acceptable for pharmaceutical assays (and preferably is government approved). Suitable materials of construction include plastics, such as polystyrene, preferably polyolefins, such as polypropylene, polyethylene, copolymers and mixtures thereof. Polysulfone is particularly preferred in view of its strength and rigidity. The liner 16 is preferably molded with passageways and openings. Alternatively, and less preferred, it may be formed by milling, drilling and other such methods.
As best seen in
The passageways are preferably tapered, narrowing as they proceed away from their respective port, to normalize pressure at each of the sub-ports 17C and 17D.
Turning back to
Positioned below the filter element 20 is a second liner 22. Preferably the second liner 22 is identical in construction to the first liner 16, but is when the device is in the assembled state, the liner 22 is inverted relative to the position of the first liner 16, as shown. This allows Port 17A to communicate with the feed ports of the device in its normal orientation, while communicating with the retentate ports while in the inverted position. Port 17B of the liner communicates with the permeate ports in both orientations.
Preferably one side of the liners 16, 20 includes a plurality of inter-engaging ribs, as best seen in
The intricate rib configuration shown provides strength and rigidity to the liner. When assembled, there is significant clamping force applied to the filter element 20 and the liner, with sealing taking place between the smooth side of the liner and the filter element 20. Without the rib configuration, the liner would not remain flat, and therefore would not seal properly to the filter element 20. The ribs make it possible to effectively assemble the liners in the filtration device of the invention, in sealing engagement upon the application of pressure, without the necessity of having corresponding grooves in the holder plates to mate with the ribs. Accordingly, the respective surfaces of the holder plates that abut the grids of the liners are preferably flat, and need not be specially designed to fit the liners.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3085970 | Davis | Apr 1963 | A |
3520803 | Iaconelli | Jul 1970 | A |
4261834 | De Winter | Apr 1981 | A |
4556489 | Diettrich et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4732675 | Badolato et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4849102 | Latour et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4867876 | Kopf | Sep 1989 | A |
5034124 | Kopf | Jul 1991 | A |
5049268 | Kopf | Sep 1991 | A |
5096582 | Lombardi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5147542 | Proulx | Sep 1992 | A |
5176828 | Proulx | Jan 1993 | A |
5258122 | Ha et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5342517 | Kopf | Aug 1994 | A |
5445737 | Ondrick | Aug 1995 | A |
5599447 | Pearl et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5868930 | Kopf | Feb 1999 | A |
7094346 | Osenar et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7306727 | Perreault | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7473404 | Chopard et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20060060518 | Perreault | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070138082 | Connors, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20110127203 | Morrissey et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110174711 | Morrissey et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2064262 | Oct 1990 | CN |
0 345 209 | Dec 1989 | EP |
1 637 213 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 844 846 | Oct 2007 | EP |
55-5684 | Jan 1980 | JP |
2000-510722 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2006-88152 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2008-238167 | Oct 2008 | JP |
9728889 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9742410 | Nov 1997 | WO |
02085511 | Oct 2002 | WO |
2008107652 | Sep 2008 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070241048 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |