The invention refers to a dissolution chamber for tablets, as for adding cleaning agents, nutrients, fertilizers, or biocides to a stream of water or other solvents.
For cleaning equipment, or in irrigation systems and disinfection devices, water or other media are mixed with additives, that are compacted to form a tablet. These use to be dissolved in a mixing chamber.
However, the dissolution of tablets hitherto can only be achieved with large quantities of water or solvent. Since the amount of material that is carried away in the medium decreases, the cleaning effect declines with the reduction of the tablet size. In the end, much water or other solvent must be spent for complete dissolution, without adequate cleaning effect. Therefore the process is often interrupted beforehand, so that a remainder of the tablet remains in the dissolution chamber, which sometimes is tedious to remove.
Another reason for annoying cleaning procedures is, that turbulences in the stream through the dissolution chamber lead to active and neutral zones, where the material easily deposes at walls and in corners.
This pertains particularly to cleaning agents with abrasive components, which are usually water insoluble and heavier and therefore are prone to deposition in partitions with low flow rate, mostly with applications, in which rather tight nozzles must be applied for to achieve an appropriate cleaning effect, because of then only a comparatively small flow speed arrives at high pressure.
For a such kind of applications—e.g. tooth cleaning with removal of plaque—a larger number of proposals have been made for cleaning agents containing abrasive particles.
The majority of the suggested solutions refer to the use of compressed air: either powdered blast grains are blown directly onto the teeth, or injected into a stream of water to be coated or mixed with it, or a cleaning mixture with blast grain (so-called slurry) is applied to dental surfaces with compressed air.
For dental practices these techniques are common, because there compressed air is regularly at hand for drills and blowing out devices.
However, for everyday dental hygiene with removal of biofilms and plaques the use of a compressor seems odd and would come at disproportionately high cost.
Nevertheless it is well known, that biofilms and deposits are only roughly removed with a toothbrush and therefore it is obvious, that daily cleaning with gently abrasive means is preferable, particularly since the surface of smooth teeth give a more pleasant and hygienic feel when touched with one's tongue.
For this purpose the employment of abrasive means in oral irrigators would be obvious—but this is, where the above mentioned problems arise.
Thereon a multiplicity of solutions had been presented, which however could not achieve acceptance so far:
Early proposals, like DE 197 29 516 A1, U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,664,369 2,814,877, 3,971,136, 3,863,628, as well as US 2003/0013063 A1, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,214,871 and 4,174,571 refer to the use of pastes and powders, the mixing of which into a water jet is comparatively simple.
But these approaches failed commercially, as cleaning and refilling of the containers turned out to be quite cumbersome and cartridge systems tended to be blocked by agglomerations of insoluble media. Starting from the seventies of last century, therefore replaceable inserts were offered, such as tablets or caps.
Thus in DE 3322716 A1 a rod of preservative agent is suggested, that is rinsed along its long sides. However, increased thinning of the shank in its center often leads to its early break-down with consequent blockage of the nozzle and/or filters.
A mouth rinsing device of Gilette S. A. (DE 696 05 184 T2) with tubular caps, offered briefly on the market in the USA, exhibited similar problems, although similar rinsing out devices for garden hoses had quite worked satisfactory, while its larger nozzles permit rinsing out of rougher components, as long as they do not bloc the nozzle gap.
But this does not work with abrasive and insoluble components. Therefore the erosion of the caps and their breaking apart here led as well to a blockade of the discharge orifices.
An opposite problem appears with the solution on WO 2008/046580 A1 to Gimelli, where the tablet is positioned in an embracing housing against the direction of the water flow. It therefore cannot break apart, however inevitably neutral zones develop: here again residual substrates are intricately to be removed before a new tablet can be used.
The task of the here disclosed, invention therefore is, to design a dissolution chamber for tablets—the simplest form of a compact preparation of cleaning agents—in such a way, that these effects cannot occur.
The inventive step is the idea to manage a uniform circulation of water under the tablet, that therefore is less affected from stronger erosion on the rim of its outer layers, and to avoid that it breaks up in the final phase. This is achieved with a hydrodynamically shaped dissolution chamber, wherein a coerced vortex keeps the tablet horizontally afloat.
The dissolution chamber for detergent tablets is designed in a way, that the incoming stream of water is first shifted into upstream turbulence by a centrifugal element, that lifts the tablet from a holding bracket against a filtering mesh, that covers the outlet above.
The distance between brackets and mesh must not be more than one quarter of the diameter plus the thickness of the tablet, so that the tablet cannot turn laterally, even when fairly ablated.
The brackets preferably consist of spiral fingers, whereon the tablet it is laid up. The whirling surge and the degassing of chemical contents from the tablet induces vibration, that provokes its rotation between the spiral fingers an the mesh until the entire surface is quite evenly ablated.
This way it is secured, that a constantly decreasing erosion of the components of the tablet can be accomplished.
This may be complemented by a multi-layer tablet composition of progressively softer, more easily ablating coatings (as described in our application DE 10 2010 051 226.5)—so not only to ablate a constant magnitude of active agents, and in the end to dissolute the tablet completely with a high concentration of hygroscopically swelling ingredients.
In a preferred embodiment the water intake is directed through circular, inwardly converging orifices into a center bore, where it results in an upward torrent. The tablet, rested on finger-like brackets halfway up in this center bore is set afloat against a filter mesh above, that separates the cylindric bore from the duct of the outlet chamber, which leads through a hose into the nozzle.
The preferred embodiment of the system is illustrated by following drawing:
The water stream 15, this way forced to carry it afloat, dissolves the tablet prior from its down side and gives it a lift up to the filter mesh 16 for holding it there, whereby the small gap 17 between brackets 13 and mesh 16 avoids, that it laterally turns or breaks.
The water stream, then containing the dissolved and the now released abrasive particles, enters into the transfer chamber 18 and from there into the connecting stub 19, which is the discharge opening.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2010 051 225 | Nov 2010 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2011/001324 | 6/10/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/5/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/069893 | 5/31/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1664369 | Maurer | Jan 1925 | A |
2814877 | Tilden | Dec 1957 | A |
3863628 | Vit | Feb 1975 | A |
3971136 | Madsen | Jul 1976 | A |
4174571 | Gallant | Nov 1979 | A |
4214871 | Arnold | Jul 1980 | A |
4625780 | Burnham | Dec 1986 | A |
4936335 | Macon | Jun 1990 | A |
4965968 | Kelsall | Oct 1990 | A |
4978297 | Vlock | Dec 1990 | A |
5374119 | Scheimann | Dec 1994 | A |
5810999 | Bachand et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
20030013063 | Goldman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040125689 | Ehrfeld et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3322716 | Jan 1985 | DE |
19729516 | Jan 1999 | DE |
10123093 | Nov 2002 | DE |
69605184 | May 2005 | DE |
102004062076 | Jul 2006 | DE |
102007058112 | Jun 2009 | DE |
2007110710 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2008004650 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2008046580 | Apr 2008 | WO |
2011070385 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report in corresponding PCT/IB2011/001324, Nov. 29, 2011, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130215705 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |