This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/148,022 filed Jun. 9, 2005, and assigned to the common assignee.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to optical receivers, and in particular to RF amplifiers that have a non-linear operating characteristic and interface between a photodiode that receives an optical signal from an optical fiber, such as used in fiber optical communications links, and electronic network terminal units.
2. Description of the Related Art
A variety of optical communications systems are known in the art which include an optical transmit portion that converts an electrical signal into an optical signal launched into an optical fiber, and a receive portion that receives an optical signal from the optical fiber and converts it into an electrical signal. Traditionally, optical receive sections include an optical assembly to focus or direct the light from the optical fiber onto a photodetector, which in turn, is connected to an amplifier/limiter circuit on a circuit board. The photodetector or photodiode is typically packaged in a hermetically sealed package in order to protect it from harsh environmental conditions. The photodiodes are semiconductor chips that are typically a few hundred microns to a couple of millimeters wide and 100-500 microns thick. The package in which they are mounted is typically from three to six millimeters in diameter, and two to five millimeters tall and has several electrical leads coming out of the package. These electrical leads are then soldered to the circuit board containing the amplifier/limiter and other circuits for processing the electrical signal.
Fiber optic transmission has been used for many years for the distribution of analog CATV signals. Optical receivers for analog CATV signals typically consist of a packaged photodiode electrically connected to a separately-packaged low-noise electronic amplifier, with the photodiode package usually consisting of a TO can with an optical window cap of a ball lens cap to allow light from an optical fiber to be coupled to the photodiode.
A disadvantage of the above arrangement is that there are significant parasitic capacitances associated with the separate photodiode and electronic amplifier packages. These parasitic capacitances play a role in limiting the performance of the optical receiver, resulting in lower bandwidth and higher noise, and contributing to higher power dissipation required to meet a particular target specification.
Distribution of analog CATV signals is particularly challenging because of the high degree of linearity required to obtain adequate quality. Two techniques have been employed previously to obtain this level of low electrical distortion.
Operating the amplifying transistors with high quiescent currents and voltages so that the signal swing is limited to a small fraction of the available current or voltage excursion. These high quiescent voltages and currents lead to high DC power dissipation.
Use of a push-pull or balanced amplifiers, which cancel even-order distortion products are also known. Push-pull amplifiers also come at the price of higher power dissipation, however, because two amplifiers are needed instead of just one single-ended amplifier, and also at the price of balanced-to-unbalanced transformers needed to interconnect to later single-ended stages.
Another technique that has been used in CATV systems is pre-distortion. Here an electrical signal is generated prior to the nonlinear element such that it cancels the distortion of the nonlinear element. This has been mainly applied to linearize lasers.
For new Fiber-to-the-Home applications that include an analog optical CATV receiver at each customer premise, there is a strong desire on the part of system suppliers and operating companies to reduce power dissipation and to lower device cost.
1. Objects of the Invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide an optical receiver with distortion cancellation for use with optical network system units such as receivers and transceivers.
It is also another aspect of the present invention to provide a distortion cancellation circuit for use in non-linear amplifiers used in analog RF transmission systems.
2. Features of the Invention
Briefly, and in general terms, the present invention provides an optical receiver for converting and coupling an information-containing optical signal from an optical fiber, including a photodiode subassembly in the housing for converting an optical signal into a modulated electrical signal corresponding to the optical signal; and an amplifier including a distortion cancellation circuit.
Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this disclosure, including the following detailed description as well as by practice of the invention. While the invention is described below with reference to preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention is not limited thereto. Those of ordinary skill in the art having access to the teachings herein will recognize additional applications, modifications and embodiments in other fields, which are within the scope of the invention as disclosed and claimed herein with respect to which the invention could be of utility.
These and other features of the present invention will be better understood and more fully appreciated by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The first amplification stage of an optical receiver usually consists of a transimpedance amplifier, also known as TIA, such that the receiver noise is minimized. In order to achieve high linearity and low electrical distortion required for analog applications, the amplifying transistors are operated with high quiescent currents and voltages so that the signal swing is limited to a small fraction of the available current or voltage excursion. These high quiescent voltages and currents lead to the high DC powerdissipation of analog TIAs.
A block diagram of this invention is shown in
When operated with low quiescent voltages and/or currents, the amplifying transistors produce distortion, which can be both real and imaginary. One or various post-distortion circuits can be added after the amplification stage to cancel the distortion. Real distortion is typically cancelled with Schottky diodes. Imaginary distortion is typically cancelled using varactor diodes, or adding reactive components to the Schottky diode circuits. Reactive components can also be added to the post-distortion circuits in order to alter the frequency dependence of the distortion. The quiescent voltages and/or currents of the amplifying transistors can also be adjusted in order to match the magnitude, phase and frequency content of the distortion generated by the post-distortion circuit. Circuits that generate second order distortion typically generate third order distortion as well. The circuits can be designed so that both second order and third order distortion is cancelled simultaneously. Alternatively, one can design a circuit in a push-pull configuration that only cancels third order distortion and a separate circuit to cancel second order distortion.
The amplifier and post-distortion circuit can be packaged together with the photodiode in order to reduce parasitics. Alternatively, either the post-distortion circuit or both amplifier and post-distortion circuits can be mounted outside the photodiode package on a circuit board.
There is a distinct advantage in using post-distortion rather than pre-distortion when correcting the distortion of a small-signal amplifier. Since the input power to the distortion circuit is higher, large levels of correction are easier to achieve with low loss. In the case of an optical receiver, you can only use post-distortion as the input signal levels are too low for pre-distortion to work.
The amplification stage is represented by transistor Q1. In this embodiment, the postdistortion stage merely consists of transistor Q2 acting as a Schottky diode. Resistor R4 is added in order to reduce the third order distortion generated by the postdistortion circuit, which could be undesirable. Resistor R2 controls the amount of postdistortion generated by the circuit, and capacitor C2 is used to adjust the phase of the distortion. The amount of second and third order distortion is also controlled by adjusting the postdistortion bias voltage.
Even though this invention has been described within the context of CATV and FTTX applications, it could benefit many other applications that might require highly linear RF and/or optoelectronic components such as, but not limited to, satellite communications, radar systems and military applications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4075474 | Straus et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4255724 | Bergero | Mar 1981 | A |
4277763 | Ward, Jr. | Jul 1981 | A |
4633197 | Vanderspool, II | Dec 1986 | A |
4700151 | Nagata | Oct 1987 | A |
4752743 | Pham et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4890300 | Andrews | Dec 1989 | A |
4902983 | Fujiki et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4992754 | Blauvelt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5038113 | Katz et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049832 | Cavers | Sep 1991 | A |
5113068 | Burke, Jr. | May 1992 | A |
5132639 | Blauvelt et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138275 | Abbiati et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5146177 | Katz et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5161044 | Nazarathy et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5239402 | Little et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5252930 | Blauvelt | Oct 1993 | A |
5321710 | Cornish et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5342389 | Haber et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5363056 | Blauvelt | Nov 1994 | A |
5373384 | Hebert | Dec 1994 | A |
5378937 | Heidemann et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381108 | Whitmarsh et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5418637 | Kuo | May 1995 | A |
5424680 | Nazarathy et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428314 | Swafford et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5430568 | Little et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430569 | Blauvelt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436749 | Pidgeon, Jr. et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5453868 | Blauvelt et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5477367 | van der Heijden | Dec 1995 | A |
5481389 | Pidgeon et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5523716 | Grebliunas et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5589797 | Gans et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600472 | Uesaka | Feb 1997 | A |
5606286 | Bains | Feb 1997 | A |
5699179 | Gopalakrishnan | Dec 1997 | A |
5768449 | Fuse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5798854 | Blauvelt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812294 | Wilson | Sep 1998 | A |
5850305 | Pidgeon | Dec 1998 | A |
5852389 | Kumar et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5939920 | Hiraizumi | Aug 1999 | A |
5963352 | Atlas et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6018266 | Wu | Jan 2000 | A |
6055278 | Ho et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061161 | Yang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6122085 | Bitler | Sep 2000 | A |
6133790 | Zhou | Oct 2000 | A |
6144706 | Sato et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6204718 | Pidgeon, Jr. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6232836 | Zhou | May 2001 | B1 |
6255908 | Ghannouchi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278870 | Davie et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288814 | Blauvelt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313701 | Mussino et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6388470 | Mattos et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6519374 | Stook et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542037 | Noll et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549316 | Blauvelt | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6570430 | Zhou | May 2003 | B1 |
6724253 | Hau et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6806778 | Kobayashi | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6946908 | Sun et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6985020 | Zhou | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7340184 | Frederiksen et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
20050195038 | Neenan et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060034622 | Day | Feb 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 370 608 | May 1990 | EP |
0524758 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0620661 | Oct 1994 | EP |
1732209 | Dec 2006 | EP |
10126284 | May 1998 | JP |
WO9532561 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 0143278 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070098417 A1 | May 2007 | US |