The present invention relates to a distortion control device and method.
The transmission-side circuit arrangement of a mobile terminal apparatus based on a general W-CDMA scheme will be described with reference to
D/A converters 108 and 109 then respectively convert the I and Q signals into analog signals. A known quadrature modulator 106 performs quadrature modulation for a local signal with these analog signals. The high-frequency signal generated as a result of this operation is input to a variable gain amplifier (VGA) 105, which then amplifies it to a predetermined level in accordance with the gain control signal output from the digital baseband unit 112 or the analog signal converted from the gain control signal by a D/A converter 107.
The high-frequency signal amplified by the variable gain amplifier 105 contains many spurious components. A bandpass filter (BPF) 104 removes these spurious components. The resultant high-frequency signal is then amplified by a power amplifier (PA) 102 and transmitted from an antenna 101. Although a power supply 103 drives the power amplifier 102,
In the R99 system, a baseband signal comprises only these two-system signals in reality. A scrambler 138 multiplies this signal by a scramble code, and then outputs real and imaginary parts as I and Q signals, respectively. Reference numerals 132 and 135 denote combiners; 136, a multiplier which multiplies j representing an imaginary number; and 137, an adder which adds a real part and an imaginary part.
According to HSUPA (High Speed Uplink Packet Access) (R6: Release 6) which is expected to be adopted in the future, the number of code channels greatly increases, as shown in
In addition, a control channel E-DPCCH for controlling these communications is additionally provided. The control channel E-DPCCH is spread by a unique spreading code Cec (a multiplier 149) and weighted by a unique weighting factor βec (a multiplier 150).
Compared with R99, therefore, HSUPA cannot meet the adjacent channel leakage power standard when amplification is performed by the same amplifier, because a large distortion occurs at an amplitude peak, unless the transmission power is decreased. A dB value indicating how much the transmission power should be decreased to meet the adjacent channel leakage power standard is called a back-off. Since R99 is currently in practical use, a dB value indicating how much the transmission power is decreased as compared with R99 to obtain the same adjacent channel leakage power as that in R99 is called a back-off relative to R99. This value will be simply referred to as a back-off hereinafter.
A PAR value is an index which is analogous to a back-off, but does not always coincide with it. This is because, the back-off changes depending on the probability distribution of peak values. A back-off value is almost determined by a combination of β (weighting factors). In R99 and HSDP, the number of combinations of β is not very large. In HSUPA, however, there are several million combinations of β because of a great increase in the number of code channels. It is impossible to generate a table by calculating back-off values for all the combinations.
The technique disclosed in reference 1 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2005-252388) is a technique conforming to HSDPA in 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project). As shown in
In the case of HSUPA, as described above, since the number of code channels greatly increases, several million combinations are required, and it is impossible to generate a table. The same applies to the technique disclosed in reference 2 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2005-318266). When the number of code channels greatly increases as in HSUPA, this technique is inadequate.
The present invention has been made to solve this problem, and has as its object to provide a distortion control device and method which can easily control transmission power to improve an ACLR without using any table.
A distortion control device according to the present invention comprises waveform analyzing means for calculating an estimated value of a back-off value required by a power amplifier, which amplifies a high-frequency signal generated from a baseband signal to a predetermined transmission power, by analyzing a waveform of the baseband signal, and control means for controlling at least one of an amplitude of high-frequency power input to the power amplifier and supply power of the power amplifier on the basis of an estimated value calculated by the waveform analyzing means.
A distortion control method according to the present invention comprises the steps of calculating an estimated value of a back-off value required by a power amplifier, which amplifies a high-frequency signal generated from a baseband signal to a predetermined transmission power, by analyzing a waveform of the baseband signal, and controlling at least one of an amplitude of high-frequency power input to the power amplifier and supply power of the power amplifier on the basis of a calculated estimated value.
According to the present invention, since the estimated value of a back-off value is calculated by analyzing the waveform of a baseband signal, there is no need to generate a table in advance by calculating a back-off value in advance for each combination of code channels. The present invention can therefore be applied to even a case in which the number of code channels greatly increases, and can effectively prevent an increase in adjacent channel leakage power due to a signal obtained by multiplexing these code channels.
The principle of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described first. The exemplary embodiment of the present invention uses a technique called Cubic Metric (to be simply referred to as CM) as a method using no table like that described above. The following is a calculation method based on this CM method.
A transmission waveform x(t) is given by
x(t)=V(t)·cos {ωc·t+φ(t)}
where V(t) is an amplitude, and φ(t) is a phase. In CM, only an amplitude is used.
First of all, RCM (Raw Cubic Metric) is defined.
RCM=20·log10 {rms[V3norm(t)]}
where Vnorm(t) is given by
Vnorm(t)=|V(t)|/rms[V(t)]
As a consequence, RCM is given by
The numerator in the log is the sextic moment of an amplitude probability density function, and the denominator is the cube of average power (quadratic moment). Therefore, RCM is a variable determined when at least an amplitude probability density function is determined. With this setting, CM is obtained as follows:
CM={RCM(Target)−RCM(R99)}/κ
In this case, RCM(Target) is the RCM of a baseband arrangement for which CM is to be calculated, and RCM(R99) is the RCM of the R99 system. The value of RCM(R99) is almost 1.52. The value of κ is experimentally determined to an optimal value. For example, κ=1.56 and κ=1.88 may be switched depending on a baseband arrangement. The CM value calculated in this manner indicates an excellent approximation as a back-off value relative to R99, and hence is used to perform back-off control and reduce distortion in the exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
The exemplary embodiment of the present invention which uses the above CM method will be described below specifically with reference to the accompanying drawings.
A baseband signal comprises an in-phase component (to be referred to as an I signal) and a quadrature component (to be referred to as a Q signal) in quadrature modulation. The digital baseband unit 12 generates this signal. The RRC roll-off filters 10 and 11 for waveform shaping band-limit the I and Q signals. The processing so far is digital signal processing.
The D/A converters 8 and 9 then respectively convert the I and Q signals into analog signals. The known quadrature modulator 6 performs quadrature modulation for a local signal with these analog signals. The high-frequency signal generated as a result of this operation is input to the variable gain amplifier 5, which then amplifies it to a predetermined level in accordance with the gain control signal supplied from the digital baseband unit 12 to the variable gain amplifier 5 via the distortion control device 60 and the D/A converter 7.
The high-frequency signal amplified by the variable gain amplifier 5 contains many spurious components. The bandpass filter 4 removes these spurious components. The resultant high-frequency signal is then amplified to a predetermined transmission power by the power amplifier 2 and transmitted from the antenna 1. In practice, circuits such as an isolator, a duplexer, and an antenna switch are arranged between the power amplifier 2 and the antenna 1. These components are not directly associated with this exemplary embodiment, and hence are not illustrated in
The distortion control device 60 will be further described. As described above, the distortion control device 60 comprises the waveform analyzing unit 13 and the maximum power reducer 14. The waveform analyzing unit 13 receives the I and Q baseband signals output from the RRC roll-off filters 10 and 11, performs waveform analysis, and calculates and outputs the estimated value of a required back-off relative to R99 as a result of the waveform analysis. In this case, as a calculation method, the CM method is used. A concrete implementation method for this method will be described with reference to
Square circuits (Square) 20 and 21 respectively square the I and Q signals input from the left side in
A cube circuit 24 cubes V2 in advance. A mean circuit 26 calculates, for example, the mean of W-CDMA data corresponding to one slot. This result is E[V6]. This value is the sextic moment of an amplitude probability density function. A divider (C=A/B) 27 divides E[V6] described above by E[V2]3. An obtained value C is given by
C=E[V6]/E[V2]3
An estimated value calculation unit 28 obtains the dB value of power of the value of C, subtracts a value (offset value) ref as in the case of R99 from the dB value, and divides the value by a predetermined constant κ, thereby outputting the resultant value as the estimated value (dB) of the back-off. In practice, the value obtained by increasing this value in increments of 0.5 dB and subtracting 1 from the resultant value is used as an MPR (Maximum Power Reduction) value. If a negative value is obtained by subtraction of 1, the dB value is set to 0. Note that ref corresponds to RCM(R99)≈1.52.
The maximum power reducer 14 receives the back-off value or MPR value output from the waveform analyzing unit 13, and outputs, as an actual gain control signal, the result which limits the value of the gain control signal output from the digital baseband unit 12 so as to prevent it from exceeding the value obtained by subtracting the MPR value from the maximum value, as shown in
With this operation, the gain of the variable gain amplifier 5 is limited to equal to or less than a value smaller than the maximum value by the MPR value. With this function, the output of the power amplifier 2 is limited to a value smaller than the maximum output by the MPR value. This can prevent an increase in adjacent channel leakage power due to a signal obtained by multiplexing many code channels, which increase is caused by the distortion of transmission power by the power amplifier.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention will be described next.
The baseband signal generating unit 18 receives the MPR value output from the waveform analyzing unit 13. The baseband signal generating unit 18 outputs the I and Q signals upon attenuating them from the planned level at which they are to be output by the following level.
attenuation amount=MAX{planned output level−(maximum level−MPR),0)}dB
where MAX{A, B} is a function which outputs larger one of A and B. In addition, an attenuation amount can be simply set as attenuation amount=MPR.
With this operation, the same effect as that of the exemplary embodiment shown in
In the above two exemplary embodiments, adjacent channel leakage power due to distortion is prevented by calculating a back-off value or MPR value by analyzing the waveform of a baseband, and reducing the transmission power by a value corresponding to the transmission power. This will always reduce transmission power. In this case, the radius of a cell in which a base station provides services decreases.
If, for example, the transmission power decreases by 1 dB, the radius of the cell becomes 0.89 times based on the assumption of free-space propagation. In terms of area, the cell becomes 0.79 times, i.e., decreases by about 20%. Therefore, a reduction in maximum transmission power by 1 dB means a reduction in the area of the cell by 20%. In other words, it is necessary to install base stations by 20% more. The operator requires extra expenditure, which is reflected in the call charge for the user in the end. It is therefore desirable to perform distortion control without decreasing transmission power if possible.
A problem of this exemplary embodiment is that current increases. Unlike in the two exemplary embodiments described above, since no power reduction occurs, this exemplary embodiment is free from the demerit that the area of the cell decreases. In addition, since a DC/DC converter capable of raising/lowering a voltage is commercially available as the variable voltage power supply 3a, it is possible to use this device.
Although the three exemplary embodiments described above can be executed singly, they can be executed in combination. That is, the exemplary embodiment shown in
The above exemplary embodiments can further comprise a function of calculating the estimated value of a back-off value from a combination of weighting relative values β of a plurality of code channels constituting a baseband signal.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-137149 | May 2006 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2007/060123 | 5/17/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/13/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/132916 | 11/22/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6914943 | Shimizu | Jul 2005 | B2 |
20050186923 | Chen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060068830 | Klomsdorf et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070155335 | Love et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184791 | Vinayak et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004120271 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005150814 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005252388 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005318266 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2007243927 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2005053151 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005053151 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Comparison of PAR and Cubic Metric for Power De-rating”, May 10-14, 2004, Motorola, R1-040642. |
Japanese Office Action for JP2008-515599 issued Apr. 26, 2011. |
International Search Report for PCT/JP2007/060123 mailed Jul. 24, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090202017 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |