This invention is directed generally to active antennas, and more particularly, to transmit and receive array antennas, such as those used in connection with cellular radio applications.
Numerous communications applications, such as cellular and personal communications services (PCS), as well as multi-channel multi-point distribution systems (MMDS) and local multi-point distribution systems (LMDS), conventionally receive and retransmit signals from subscribers utilizing antennas mounted at the tops of towers or other structures. Other communications systems such as wireless local loop (WLL), specialized mobile radio (SMR), and wireless local area network (WLAN), have signal transmission infrastructure for receiving and transmitting communications between system subscribers that similarly utilize various forms of antennas and transceivers.
All of these communications systems require amplification of the signals being transmitted by the antennas. For this purpose, it has heretofore been the practice to use a conventional linear power amplifier system placed at the bottom of the tower or other structure upon which the antennas are mounted. From the base of the tower, the conventional linear power amplifier system typically couples to the antenna elements mounted on the tower with coaxial cables. Coaxial cables, however, introduce power losses that are proportional to length. To overcome these power losses, substantial amplification is typically required, which necessitates the use of more expensive, higher power amplifiers.
Moreover, the diameter of the cables must generally be of a low loss variety to mitigate insertion losses. In addition to increasing system material costs, the low loss cables characteristically have large diameter cross-sections. Thus, along with the relatively long length of cable required by the system configuration, the large diameter of the cables can contribute towards making a system vulnerable to damage sustained from high wind conditions. That is, the dimensions of the cables increase the wind friction experienced by the system.
The size and number of coaxial cables further require reinforcement of the tower structure to accommodate loading forces associated with the weight of the cables. System architects may consequently implement costly preventative design features and expect periodic cable disconnections and other repairs.
As discussed herein, insertion losses associated with the cables may necessitate some increases in the power amplification. A ground level infrastructure or base station typically provides the compensatory amplification, thus further increasing the expense per unit or cost per watt. Of note, output power levels for infrastructure (base station) applications in many of the foregoing communications systems are typically in excess of ten watts, and often up to hundreds of watts, which results in a relatively high effective isotropic power requirement (EIPR).
For example, for a typical base station with a twenty-watt power output (at ground level), the power delivered to the antenna, minus cable losses, is around ten watts. In this case, half of the power has been consumed in cable loss/heat. Such systems require complex linear amplifier components cascaded into high power circuits to achieve the required linearity at the higher output power. Typically, for such high power systems or amplifiers, additional high power dividers must be employed. Operating characteristics of such divider equipment may introduce further insertion losses associated with the equipment, itself.
Some of such losses are addressed in certain instances by positioning amplification equipment closer to the antenna(s) on the tower mast. While helpful in mitigating some insertion losses associated with cables running up the towers to the antenna(s), such placement of the amplifiers still fails to address insertion losses associated with the jumper cable that connects the amplifier to the antenna, as well as any power divider disposed therebetween. Moreover, even where an antenna has multiple elements, those elements are typically coupled to and serviced by a common amplifier and divider. Thus, failure of a single amplifier, divider or other amplifying component may effectively render the entire system inoperable. In this manner, the reliability of a system having multiple elements remains undermined by the collective dependence of the respective elements on common components. Furthermore, the relative inaccessibility of the amplification equipment attributable to its proximity to the to the tower mast can compound repairs and other maintenance. Consequently, inefficiencies associated with insertion losses continue to hinder operation and result in a relatively high cost of unit per watt.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of the embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
The invention addresses the above-discussed problems associated with the prior art by providing an antenna system 10 configured to improve cellular system performance by, in one respect, mitigating the occurrence of insertion losses through the use of an antenna incorporating an array of antenna elements and distributed amplifiers coupled to those individual elements in the array.
Referring generally to
Antenna system 10 may further include a control or base station 22 in electrical communication with the antenna elements 12. Of note, embodiments of the present invention may allow the antenna elements 12 to communicate with the control station 22 via small diameter (i.e. not low-loss) cable. Utilization of the small diameter cable can reduce system 10 costs and wind load complications. Of note, while control station 22 may stand adjacent tower 16, the exemplary antenna system 10 depicted in
In the illustrated embodiment of
Still other embodiments of the antenna system 10 shown in
To this end,
Of note, a suitable duplexer 32, 40 for purposes of the present embodiment may include any device configured to facilitate two-way signal transmission. In one embodiment, the duplexers 32, 40 and at least one low noise amplifier 48 may be collocated proximate the top 14 of a tower structure 16 supporting the plurality of antenna elements 12. Such concentrated placement may function to further reduce insertion losses associated with conventional, lengthy cables. The distributed arrangement of the duplexers 32, 40, antenna elements 12 and low noise amplifiers 48 may additionally contribute to the robustness of the system 30 by virtue of the each antenna element 12 not being collectively dependent upon a single amplification component 11.
As employed in
The amplification system 30 of
Each duplexer 40 of the second set of duplexers may likewise have at least one receive port 46, one transmit port 44 and one antenna port 42. As in the embodiment shown in
The amplification system 30 of
The output 52 of each low noise amplifier 48 may, in turn, couple to a respective receive port 46 of the second set of the plurality of duplexers 40. As such, signals from the duplexers 32 of the first set of duplexers may drive the output of each low noise amplifier 48 as supplied to respective duplexers 40 of the second set. In one embodiment, at least one power divider 54 may couple to respective antenna ports 42 of the second set of the plurality of duplexers 40. Thus, the power divider 54 may be configured to simultaneously accommodate signals intended for transmission at the antenna elements 12, as well as those transmitted to the duplexers 40. Accordingly, the power divider 54 may simultaneously combine signals received from the antenna elements 12 via the low noise amplifiers 48 and duplexers 40. Of note, another embodiment consistent with the underlying principles of the invention may include multiple power dividers 34 as dictated by space, performance and other system 30 preferences.
In this manner, the embodiment shown in
Similar advantages may be realized using the antenna configuration shown in
Turning more particularly to
One embodiment consistent with the principles of the present invention may include at least one combiner 68 within the amplification system 60 of
Of note, the antenna system 60 may further include one or more band pass filters 78 coupled to both the respective input 74 of each low noise amplifier 64 and to the transmit port 65 of each circulator 62. Thus, the signals outputted from the antenna elements 12 and passing through the circulators 63 are filtered prior to processing at the low noise amplifiers 64. One skilled in the art should appreciate that while separate circulators 62 are shown coupled to each antenna element 12 in
An embodiment of the amplification system 80 shown in
The transmission paths shown in the embodiments of
As with the embodiment shown in
An embodiment of amplification system 90 includes a plurality of low noise amplifiers 92. As above, while the low noise amplifiers 92 shown in
As shown in
The exemplary antenna system 90 of
The amplification system 116 of
The amplification system 130 shown in
The amplification system 130 may further include a plurality of low noise amplifiers 134 in communication with both the antenna elements 12 and the power divider 132. More particularly, each low noise amplifier may be configured to discriminate between different signals being transmitted, or uplinked, to a base station 22. As such, each low noise amplifier 134 may have an input 136 and an output 138 with which to respectively receive and transmit processed signals. As shown in
The embodiment shown in
Each duplexer 154 of the second set of the plurality of duplexers may likewise include at least one receive port 156, transmit port 158 and antenna port 160. The receive port 156 of each of the second set of duplexers 154 may couple to the output 138 of a respective low noise amplifier 134. Moreover, transmit ports 158 of each of the second set of the plurality of duplexers 154 may couple to the inputs 142 of respective power amplifiers 140. Finally, the respective antenna ports 160 of each of the second set of duplexers 154 may couple to at least the power divider 132.
In this manner, the duplexers 154 allow signals to pass from the power divider 132 to the antenna elements 12, while simultaneously outputting signals received from the low noise amplifiers 134 back to the power divider 132. Of note, while reliance on a single power divider 132 may have particular application under certain circumstances, one skilled in the art should nonetheless appreciate that the functionality of the single power divider 132 shown in
What has been shown and described herein is a novel antenna system employing duplexers, power combiners/dividers, low power/noise amplifiers and/or other modules at or near the feeds of individual array antenna elements 12 in a manner that addresses shortcomings of the prior art. Benefits from such embodiments include minimization of filtering, cable and other equipment used in comparable systems. Embodiments of the present invention further mitigate the occurrence and effects of insertion loss attributable to power dividers and cabling in known antenna systems. Cumulative improvements realized by the disclosed embodiments may additionally realize signal improvements in system signal-to-noise ratio. System reliability is also improved by virtue of the low noise amplifiers 48 and duplexers 32 being distributed among multiple antenna elements 12. Thus, the amplification system 30 can withstand one or more low noise amplifier 48 failures with minimal impact to signal quality.
While the present invention has been illustrated by a description of various embodiments, and while these embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicants to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. The invention in its broader aspects is therefore not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative example shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of applicant's general inventive concept.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4070637 | Assal et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4124852 | Steudel | Nov 1978 | A |
4246585 | Mailloux | Jan 1981 | A |
4360813 | Fitzsimmons | Nov 1982 | A |
4566013 | Steinberg et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4607389 | Halgrimson | Aug 1986 | A |
4614947 | Rammos | Sep 1986 | A |
4689631 | Gans et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4825172 | Thompson | Apr 1989 | A |
4849763 | DuFort | Jul 1989 | A |
4890110 | Kuwahara | Dec 1989 | A |
4994813 | Shiramatsu et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5034752 | Pourailly et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038150 | Bains | Aug 1991 | A |
5061939 | Nakase | Oct 1991 | A |
5206604 | Vaninetti | Apr 1993 | A |
5230080 | Fabre et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5247310 | Waters | Sep 1993 | A |
5248980 | Raguenet | Sep 1993 | A |
5270721 | Tsukamoto et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280297 | Profera, Jr. | Jan 1994 | A |
5327150 | Cherrette | Jul 1994 | A |
5355143 | Zurcher et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
RE34796 | Smith et al. | Nov 1994 | E |
5379455 | Koschek | Jan 1995 | A |
5412414 | Ast et al. | May 1995 | A |
5437052 | Hemmie et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5457557 | Zarem et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5513176 | Dean et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5548813 | Charas et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554865 | Larson | Sep 1996 | A |
5568160 | Collins | Oct 1996 | A |
5596329 | Searle et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5604462 | Gans et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604925 | O'Malley et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5610510 | Boone et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5619210 | Dent | Apr 1997 | A |
5623269 | Hirshfield et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5644316 | Lewis et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5644622 | Russell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646631 | Arntz | Jul 1997 | A |
5657374 | Russell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659322 | Caille | Aug 1997 | A |
5680142 | Smith et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5710804 | Bhame et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714957 | Searle et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724666 | Dent | Mar 1998 | A |
5745841 | Reudink et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751250 | Arntz | May 1998 | A |
5754139 | Turcotte et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758287 | Lee et al. | May 1998 | A |
5770970 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771017 | Dean et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774666 | Portuesi | Jun 1998 | A |
5784031 | Weiss et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790078 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802173 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809395 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815115 | Carloni et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825762 | Kamin, Jr. et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832389 | Dent | Nov 1998 | A |
5835128 | Macdonald et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854611 | Gans et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5856804 | Turcotte et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5862459 | Charas | Jan 1999 | A |
5872547 | Martek | Feb 1999 | A |
5878345 | Ray et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880701 | Bhame et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884147 | Reudink et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889494 | Reudink et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5896104 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5923296 | Sanzgirl et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929823 | Martek et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933113 | Newberg et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936577 | Shoki et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936591 | Yamasa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940045 | Belcher et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949376 | McDonald et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966094 | Ward et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969689 | Martek et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987335 | Knoedl, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6008763 | Nystrom et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016123 | Barton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018643 | Golemon et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020848 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037903 | Lange et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043790 | Derneryd et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047199 | DeMarco | Apr 2000 | A |
6055230 | Feuerstein et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070090 | Feuerstein | May 2000 | A |
6072434 | Papatheodorou | Jun 2000 | A |
6091360 | Reits | Jul 2000 | A |
6091970 | Dean | Jul 2000 | A |
6094165 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6104935 | Smith et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6140976 | Locke et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144652 | Avidor et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157343 | Andersson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160514 | Judd | Dec 2000 | A |
6181276 | Schlekewey et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188373 | Martek | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195556 | Reudink et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198434 | Martek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198435 | Reudink et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6198460 | Brankovic | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222503 | Gietema et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233434 | Takei | May 2001 | B1 |
6233466 | Wong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236849 | Reudink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240274 | Izadpanah | May 2001 | B1 |
6246674 | Feuerstein et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266545 | Backman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269255 | Waylett | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6377558 | Dent | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6519478 | Scherzer et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567647 | Epperson | May 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2306650 | Oct 2000 | CA |
0 245 955 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0 447 218 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0 551 556 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 639 035 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0 713 261 | May 1996 | EP |
0 878 974 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 984 554 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 994 567 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1 111 821 | Jun 2001 | EP |
2 286 749 | Aug 1995 | GB |
08-102618 | Apr 1996 | JP |
11-330838 | Nov 1999 | JP |
WO 9526116 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9534102 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9744914 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9811626 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9809372 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9926317 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 0031824 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0039943 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 9850981 | Apr 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040192392 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |