This invention relates to an improved distributed amplifier.
A traditional distributed amplifier is a topology well known in industry as a proven way to build a wideband amplifier. Typical bandwidths of distributed amplifiers on a GaAs substrate could be on the order of the kHz to millimeter wave frequencies. A cascode distributed amplifier is widely recognized as a way to improve gain and bandwidth over a non-cascode distributed amplifier.
The benefit of a distributed amplifier is accomplished by incorporating the parasitic effects of the transistor into the matching networks between devices. The input and output capacitances of the device can be combined with the gate and drain line inductance, respectively, to make the transmission lines virtually transparent, excluding transmission line loss. By doing this, the gain of the amplifier may only be limited by the transconductance of the device and not the parasitics associated with the device. This only happens if the signal traveling down the gate line is in phase with the signal traveling down the drain line, so that each transistor's output voltage adds in phase with the previous transistors output. The signal traveling to the output will constructively interfere so that the signal grows along the drain line. Any reverse waves will destructively interfere since these signals will not be in phase. The gate line termination is included to absorb any signals that are not coupled to the gates of the transistors. The drain line termination is included to absorb any reverse traveling waves that could destructively interfere with the output signal.
Stability of amplifiers is essential to keep a predetermined state of the circuit. A wide variety of problems arise if the amplifier is shown to oscillate or have the potential to oscillate. Problems due to oscillation can range from fluctuations in bias conditions to circuit self-destruction, etc.
Parametric oscillation is a type of oscillation that typically only occurs when certain RF power levels are applied to an amplifier, i.e., under quiescent or small conditions the amplifier appears stable.
Prior stabilizing methods have not been beneficial in preventing parametric oscillations. For example, in a cascode distributed amplifier, there is a capacitor on the gate of the common-gate (CG) device that acts to negate the Miller Capacitance which a purely common-source (CS) amplifier contains. It negates the Miller capacitance by theoretically creating an RF short at the gate node of the CU device. In many cases, this capacitor is reduced to smaller values (˜0.5 pF) to tune the cascode circuit for improved power performance. This capacitor may require a resistor to De-Q the network such that it won't oscillate. Increasing this resistor value from a nominal value (e.g. 5 ohms) is a common way to enhance the stability of the circuit. This method, however, may hurt performance (i.e., provide much less bandwidth), and it may not help with parametric oscillation stability.
Another prior approach in attempting to stabilize the CG device of a cascode distributed amplifier is to introduce the loss seen by the drain in the foul of a shunt resistor-capacitor (R-C) connected between the drains of the CG devices. This method, however, provides no significant reduction of parametric oscillation. For example, the CG gate resistance may actually become more negative while further degrading the gain of the amplifier.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a distributed amplifier in which parametric oscillations are reduced or eliminated.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a distributed amplifier in which the gain is not significantly degraded.
It is a further object of this invention to provide such a distributed amplifier in which the bandwidth is not significantly reduced.
The subject invention results from the realization that parametric oscillations in a distributed amplifier can be reduced or eliminated, in one embodiment, by a feedback network including a non-parasitic resistance and capacitance coupled in series between a drain and a gate of at least one of the amplifier's common-gate configured transistors.
The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these objectives.
In one embodiment, the distributed amplifier with improved stabilization includes an input transmission circuit; an output transmission circuit; at least one cascode amplifier coupled between the input and output transmission circuits, each cascode amplifier including a common-gate configured transistor coupled to the output transmission circuit, and a common-source configured transistor coupled between the input transmission circuit and the common-gate configured transistor; and a feedback network including a non-parasitic resistance and capacitance coupled in series between a drain and a gate of at least one of the common-gate configured transistors for increasing the amplifier stability.
In a preferred embodiment, the drains of each of the common-gate transistors may be coupled together and the gates of each of the common-source configured transistors may be coupled together. Each cascode amplifier may further include one or more additional common-gate transistors DC-coupled between each of the common-gate configured transistors and common-source configured transistors. The resistance and the capacitance of each feedback network may include a resistor and a capacitor coupled in series across the gate and drain terminals of at least one of the one or more additional common-gate configured transistors. Each of the common-gate configured transistors may include a non-parasitic resistance and capacitance coupled between its corresponding drain and gate. There may be only one cascade amplifier coupled between the input and output transmission circuits. Each resistor may have a value of approximately 800 ohms and each capacitor may have a value of approximately 1 pF. Each resistor may have a value in a range of between 20 ohms to 10K ohms. Each capacitor may have a value in a range of between 0.1 pF to 10 pF.
In another embodiment, the distributed amplifier with improved stabilization may include an input transmission circuit; an output transmission circuit; at least two cascode amplifiers coupled between the input and output transmission circuits, each cascode amplifier including a common-gate transistor coupled to the output transmission circuit, and a common-source transistor coupled between the input transmission circuit and the common-gate transistor; and a feedback network including a resistor and capacitor coupled between a drain and a gate of at least one of the common-gate transistors for increasing the stabilization of at least one common-gate transistor.
In a preferred embodiment, each cascode amplifier may further include a second common-gate transistor coupled between the common-gate and common-source transistors. Each of the common-gate transistors may include a resistor and capacitor coupled between its corresponding drain and gate. There may be between and including four and ten cascade amplifiers coupled between the input and output transmission circuits. Each resistor may have a value of approximately 800 ohms and each capacitor may have a value of approximately 1 pF. Each resistor may have a value in the range of between 20 ohms to 10K ohms. Each capacitor may have a value in the range of between 0.1 pF to 10 pF.
Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
Traditional distributed amplifiers are shown in
As described above, the stability of amplifiers is essential to keep a predetermined state of the circuit. A wide variety of problems arise if the amplifier is shown to oscillate or have the potential to oscillate. Problems due to oscillation can range from fluctuations in bias conditions to circuit self-destruction, etc. Cascode distributed amplifiers are shown to be prone to oscillations due to the output impedance of the common-gate being negative under normal conditions as shown in
Parametric oscillations are typically oscillations that only occur when RF power is applied to the amplifier, i.e. under DC conditions, the amplifier appears stable.
Parametric oscillations typically occur at half of the fundamental frequency of operation. The oscillation can also be shown to split into two oscillations occurring at 2 different frequencies with the same relative delta in frequency from half of the fundamental frequency e.g. if fo=16 GHz then fo/2=8 GHz (oscillations could occur at 7 and 9 GHz). An example measurement of a parametric oscillation is shown in
As described above, prior stabilizing methods have not been beneficial in preventing parametric oscillations. For example, in a cascode distributed amplifier, there is a capacitor on the gate of the common-gate (CG) device that acts to negate the Miller Capacitance which a purely common-source (CS) amplifier contains. It negates the Miller capacitance by theoretically creating an RF short at the gate node of the CG device. In many cases, this capacitor is reduced to smaller values (˜0.5 pF) to tune the cascode circuit for improved power performance. This capacitor may require a resistor to De-Q the network such that it won't oscillate. Increasing this resistor value from a nominal value (e.g. 5 ohms) is a common way to enhance the stability of the circuit. This method, however, may hurt performance (i.e., provide much less bandwidth), and as can be seen in
Another prior approach in attempting to stabilize the CG device of a cascode distributed amplifier is to introduce the loss seen by the drain in the form of a shunt resistor-capacitor (R-C) connected between the drains of the CG devices. This method, however, provides no significant reduction of parametric oscillation. It can be seen from
In narrowband amplifiers, it can be shown that parametric oscillations can be reduced or eliminated by introducing loss selectively at frequencies lower then the band of operation without significantly degrading amplifier performance. This works because the parametric oscillation typically occurs at half the fundamental frequency of operation. The loss can be introduced selectively by including a high pass filter in series with the amplifier, with a cutoff frequency below the band of interest such that in the band of interest the loss is minimal. Another method for narrowband circuits is to introduce a subharmonic trap, i.e. an inductor-capacitor resonant circuit which is designed to only introduce loss at the subharmonic frequency.
Wideband circuits such as a distributed amplifier are more difficult to stabilize, however, because introducing loss will possibly degrade the entire frequency response in terms of gain and power. It is preferable to find a way to introduce loss in the amplifier to reduce the parametric oscillation without significantly degrading the amplifier performance.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention a distributed amplifier 100,
Each resistor 124a . . . 124n may have a value in a range of between 20 ohms to 10K ohms. Each capacitor 126a . . . 126n may have a value in a range of between 0.1 pF to 10 pF. More preferably, each resistor 124a . . . 124n may have a value of approximately 800 ohms and each capacitor 126a . . . 126n may have a value of approximately 1 pF.
Each CG configured transistor 118a includes a common-gate transistor, and each CS configured transistor 120a includes a common-source transistor. The distributed amplifier 100a,
The distributed amplifier 100b,
In
Incorporating the CG device of
To further improve the stability of the circuit, the size of the feedback resistor may be reduced to 500 or 600 ohms. To be able to kill a parametric oscillation in an amplifier without degrading the overall performance, the impedance is preferably seen at every node of the circuit at small signal conditions and under applied RF power. Often, the resistance of a node will change between small signal conditions and under applied RF power. It is preferable to satisfy small signal stability in additional to large signal stability for an amplifier to be considered stable. The conditions for oscillation are a negative resistance, which in turn will create a positive reflection coefficient, as well as a 0 or 360 degree loop phase shift. A positive reflection coefficient has the ability to create a loop gain of 1 and combined with a phase shift of 0 or 360 degrees around that loop will likely create an oscillation.
In
The subject invention can stabilize a cascode distributed amplifier in terms of a parametric oscillation without significantly degrading amplifier performance. In addition, this will help small signal stability. This technique could be applied to any Common-Gate transistor used in a distributed amplifier topology. That is, there could be a cascade of two CG transistors, or a triple stack distributed amplifier, as shown in
Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the preceding description or illustrated in the drawings. If only one embodiment is described herein, the subject invention is not to be limited to that embodiment. For example, bipolar (BJT) transistors could be used instead of FETs with base, collector, and emitter electrode designations. Moreover, scope of the subject invention is not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction, or disclaimer.
Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, “coupled”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of any claim element presented in the application as filed: those skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are many other reasons the applicant cannot be expected to describe certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element amended.
Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/385,772, filed on Mar. 6, 2012 (later issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,786,368, issue date Jul. 22, 2014), which claims the benefit of and priority thereto under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 363, 365, and 37 C.F.R. §1.55 and §1.78, the latter of which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/464,781, filed on Mar. 9, 2011 under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 363, 365, and 37 C.F.R. §1.55 and §1.78, and both applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5130664 | Pavlic et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5208547 | Schindler | May 1993 | A |
5227734 | Schindler et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5485118 | Chick | Jan 1996 | A |
5920230 | Beall | Jul 1999 | A |
6049250 | Kintis et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6137367 | Ezzedine et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6377125 | Pavio et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6597243 | Fratti | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6768380 | Hong et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6864750 | Shigematsu | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6922106 | Lautzenhiser et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7173502 | Hosoya | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7352241 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7498883 | Wu et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7646252 | Banba | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7724091 | Vickes | May 2010 | B2 |
7804362 | Nguyen | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7843268 | Benson | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7915957 | Nojima | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7936210 | Robinson et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8427241 | Ezzeddine et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8487706 | Li et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8665022 | Kobayashi | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8779859 | Su et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8786368 | Benson | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20030112075 | Betti-Berutto et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20080169877 | Banba | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100060362 | Kanaya et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100253434 | Nojima | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1758533 | Apr 2006 | CN |
1 276 230 | Jan 2003 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Taiwan Office Action of Dec. 12, 2014 and English translation thereof for Taiwan Patent Application No. 101107928, filed on Mar. 8, 2012. 9 pages. |
Chinese Office Action of May 5, 2014 and English translation thereof for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210060713.8, filed on Mar. 9, 2012. 19 pages. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application EP 12250050.7, dated Sep. 30, 2015. (5 pages). |
Taiwan Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2016 and English Translation thereof for Taiwan Patent Application No. 104121003 filed on Jun. 29, 2015, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140320211 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61464781 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13385772 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14327944 | US |