The disclosure generally relates to sensing systems and methods, and in particular relates to distributed Brillouin sensing systems and methods that use a few-mode sensing optical fiber.
Distributed sensors based on Brillouin scattering are attractive for forming optical fiber sensing systems used to measure the structural integrity of buildings, bridges, tunnels, dams and pipelines, as well as ships and airplanes. The most popular Brillouin optical fiber sensing system is Brillouin Optical Time Domain Reflectometry (BOTDR). This technique is very similar to Rayleigh-based OTDR, where spontaneous Brillouin light backscattered from an intense pulse is recorded as a function of time. The frequency distribution of the backscattered signal is measured for each time step to determine a strain or a temperature change at each location. Like a conventional OTDR, a BOTDR requires access to a single fiber end only, which is convenient for many applications. However, the spatial resolution of BOTDR is practically limited to 1 m.
Another optical fiber sensing system utilizes Brillouin Optical Time Domain Analysis (BOTDA). This technique takes advantage of the Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS) based on a pump-probe technique wherein an intense pump pulse interacts locally during its propagation with a weak counter-propagated continuous-wave (CW) probe. The gain experienced by the probe at each location can be analyzed by recording the probe amplitude in the time domain. The frequency difference between the pump and the probe is scanned step-by-step, and the local amplification can be retrieved for a given pump-probe frequency difference. The local gain spectrum can then be reconstructed by analyzing the gain at a given location as a function of frequency. BOTDA requires access to both optical fiber ends since the pump pulse and CW probe must counter-propagate in the sensing fiber, which is a limitation in some situations. BOTDA is subject to the similar spatial resolution limitation as BOTDR, i.e., about 1 m, because of 1) the tradeoff between spatial resolution and sensing sensitivity, and 2) the significant broadening and lowering of the Brillouin gain spectrum as the pulse width is reduced to the values comparable with the acoustic relaxation time (˜10 ns).
To improve the spatial resolution, the use of a Brillouin Dynamic Grating (BDG) formed in a polarization-maintaining single-mode optical fiber has been proposed. In this approach, an acoustic wave is generated in one polarization by a pump and is used to reflect an orthogonally polarized probe at a different optical frequency from the pump. An experiment result was reported wherein a distributed strain is measured with a 10 cm spatial resolution in a 105 m of polarization-maintaining single-mode optical fiber. However, polarization-maintaining single-mode optical fibers typically have higher attenuation and are more expensive than standard optical fibers. In addition, the sensing schemes required for a polarization-maintaining optical single-mode fiber system require polarization-maintaining components that add additional cost and complexity to the sensing systems. Furthermore, it is difficult to maintain a given polarization over a long fiber (i.e., a few km or longer), which limits the sensor system length.
There is therefore a need for low-cost optical fiber sensing systems with improved spatial resolution.
An embodiment of the disclosure is a distributed Brillouin optical fiber sensing system. The system includes a sensing optical fiber configured to support a fundamental guided mode and at least one higher-order guided mode. The system includes a pump light source configured to introduce pump light into one of the guided modes to define a pump light guided mode. The pump light forms a Brillouin dynamic grating (BDG) within the sensing optical fiber. The system also has a probe light source that is configured to introduce input probe light into one or more of the guided modes other than the pump light guided mode to create reflected probe light from the BDG. The reflected probe light and the input probe light are shifted in frequency relative to each other by a Brillouin frequency shift. The system also includes a receiver optically coupled to the sensing optical fiber. The receiver is configured to detect the reflected probe light to determine a Brillouin frequency shift and the reflection location, and in an example is or includes an optical spectral analyzer.
Another embodiment of the disclosure is a distributed Brillouin optical fiber sensing system. The system has a sensing optical fiber configured to support at least first and second guided modes. In an example, the sensing optical fiber is not polarization-maintaining. The system also includes a first pump light source optically coupled to the sensing optical fiber. The first pump light source is configured to generate first pump light that travels in the sensing optical fiber in the first guided mode and forms a BDG that contains information of a local Brillouin frequency of the sensing optical fiber. The system also includes a probe light source optically coupled to the sensing optical fiber. The probe light source is configured to generate pulsed probe light that travels in the sensing optical fiber in the second guided mode. The pulsed probe light has a wavelength selected so that at least a portion of the pulsed probe light reflects from the Brillouin dynamic grating and includes information about the local Brillouin frequency. The system also has a receiver optically coupled to the sensing optical fiber and configured to receive the reflected probe light and to determine the local Brillouin frequency and the reflection location, and thus at least one condition along the sensing optical fiber.
Another embodiment of the invention is a method of sensing at least one condition along a sensing optical fiber. The method includes sending pump light down the optical fiber in only a first guided mode supported by the sensing optical fiber to create a BDG. The method also includes sending pulsed probe light of a first frequency down the optical fiber in at least a second guided mode supported by the sensing optical fiber to obtain reflected probe light from the Brillouin dynamic grating. The reflected probe light has a second frequency shifted relative to the first frequency by a frequency shift and has a reflection location. The method further includes analyzing the reflected probe light to determine its reflection location and its shifted frequency to determine the at least one condition. In an example, the at least one condition is at least one of temperature and strain as a function of location (distance) along the sensing optical fiber.
Additional features and advantages will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, and in part will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from that description or recognized by practicing the same as described herein, including the detailed description that follows, the claims, as well as the appended drawings.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description present embodiments that are intended to provide an overview or framework for understanding the nature and character of the claims. The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure, and are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate various embodiments and together with the description serve to explain the principles and operation.
Reference is now be made in detail to embodiments of the disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Whenever possible, like reference numbers are used to refer to like components or parts. Cartesian coordinates are shown in some of the Figures by way of reference.
In the discussion below and in the claims, reference to a “first guided mode” and a “second guided mode” does not necessarily refer to the lowest order and first-order guided modes respectively, but rather is more generally intended to refer to different ones of the available guided modes.
Also in the discussion below, the following definitions and terminology as commonly used in the art are employed.
Refractive index profile: the refractive index profile is the relationship between the relative refractive index percent (Δ %) and the optical fiber radius r (as measured from the centerline of the optical fiber) over a selected segment of the fiber.
Relative refractive index percent Δ(%) or Δ: the term Δ represents a relative measure of refractive index defined by the equation: Δ(%)=100x(ni2−nc2)/2ni2 where ni is the maximum refractive index of the index profile segment denoted as i, and nc, the reference refractive index. Every point in the segment has an associated relative refractive index measured relative to the reference refractive index.
In an example, the optical coupling to sensing optical fiber input/output end 52 of pump and probe light sources 20 and 30 and receiver 100 is accomplished using different sections of multimode optical fiber F and multimode 1×2 50:50 fiber-optic couplers 40. In an embodiment, the multimode optical fiber F and the multimode couplers 40 are made of the same few mode fiber as the sensing fiber to minimize the insertion loss. Thus, in one embodiment, pump light source 20 is optically coupled to a first optical coupler 40-1 via a first optical fiber section F1, while probe light source 30 and receiver 100 are respectively optically coupled to a second optical coupler 40-2 via respective optical fiber sections F2 and F3. Second optical coupler 40-2 is optically coupled to first optical coupler 40-1 via a fourth optical fiber section F4. First fiber optic coupler 40-1 is also optically coupled to sensing optical fiber input/output end 52.
In an example, pump light source 20 comprises a narrow-linewidth laser.
Different types of lasers can be used as pump lasers for pump light source 20, including semiconductor lasers and fiber lasers, as shown in
In an example, probe light source 30 comprises a narrow-linewidth tunable laser.
With reference again to
Probe light source 30 is shown by way of example to include an optical modulator 36 that serves to optically modulate CW probe light 32 from CW tunable laser 34 to generate pulsed probe light prior to the probe light being coupled into optical fiber section F2 via a mode converter 71, which serves to introduce a select mode into the optical fiber section F2.
Mode converter 71 residing between (multimode) optical fiber section F5 and single-mode optical fiber section 60 serves to convert reflected probe light 32R from the LP11 guided mode into the LP01 guided mode if the reflected probe light is in the LP11 guided mode in sensing optical fiber 50. This mode converter is not needed if the probe light is already in the LP01 guide mode in sensing optical fiber 50. The narrow-bandwidth filter 27 is used to pass only reflected probe light 32R and to filter out all other reflected light.
In the general operation of system 10 as shown in
With reference now also to
If pump light 22 is transmitted in sensing optical fiber 50 in a guided mode i and the exited acoustic wave is in acoustic guided mode m, the Brillouin frequency shift is given by
and the corresponding wavelength shift is:
where λ1 is the optical wavelength of the pump, ni is the effective refractive index of the optical guided mode of order i, and Vm is the effective acoustic velocity of the acoustic guided mode of order m. If short-pulse probe light 32 of frequency ν2 is sent though guided mode j (i.e., a guided mode different than that of the pump light 22), a signal of frequency ν2−νB is reflected by BDG 54 if the phase-matching conditions are satisfied, i.e., if the frequency change between the probe and the pump is:
and the corresponding wavelength shift is:
where Δnij=ni−nj is the difference in effective index between optical (guided) guided modes i and j.
When the frequency difference (ν1−ν′1) matches the Brillouin frequency shift νB, BDG 54 is generated in sensing optical fiber 50. As in the single-pump-light embodiment, the Brillouin frequency shift νB depends on the optical fiber properties of sensing optical fiber 50 and the optical and acoustic guided modes. If pump light 22 and pump light 22′ are transmitted though an optical guided mode i and the exited acoustic wave is in acoustic guided mode m, the Brillouin frequency shift νB and the corresponding wavelength shift are given by Equations 1 and 1a, above.
If probe light 32 of frequency ν2 is sent through an optical guided mode j propagating in the same direction as pump light 22, a signal of ν2-νB is reflected by BDG 54 if the phase-matching conditions are satisfied, i.e., if the frequency change between the probe light 32 and the pump light 22 satisfies Equation 2, or the wavelength change between the probe light 32 and pump light 22 satisfies Equation 2a.
In both embodiments, a stable BDG 54 can be formed by a narrowband Brillouin gain (also a narrowband BDG), which can be localized and scanned along sensing optical fiber 50 in the time domain by a broadband, short-pulse probe light 32 having a nanosecond pulse width and supported by a different guided mode than the pump light 22.
It is noted here that the embodiments of system 10 as illustrated in
Pump Light and Probe Light Supported by Different Guided Modes
An embodiment of the disclosure is that pump light 22 travels in a different guided mode than probe light 32. In one example, pump light 22 is supported by a guided mode of lower order than that of probe light 32, and this guided mode can be called the pump light guided mode.
In another example, pump light 22 is supported by a guided mode of higher order than that of probe light 32.
In an example, pump light 22 is supported by a single guided mode, and probe light 32 is supported by multiple other guided modes besides the pump light guided mode.
Spatial Resolution
BDG 54 is temperature and strain dependent as a result of the thermal expansion and deformation experienced by sensing optical fiber 50. Thus, the peak frequency of the reflected probe light 32R changes with temperature and strain, namely:
νB(T)=CTT+νB0 (3)
νB(ε)=CεT+νB0 (4)
where CT is the temperature coefficient in MHz/° C., T is the temperature in ° C., νB0 is the reference Brillouin frequency, Cε is the strain coefficient in MHz/με, and ε is the strain.
Therefore, temperature and strain at different locations along sensing optical fiber 50 can be evaluated using BDG 54 by determining the frequency difference between probe light 32 and the reflected probe light 32R. Because of the narrow spectral bandwidth of BDG 54, high-resolution sensing can be achieved. Meanwhile, since probe light 32 can have a relatively short pulse width, a high spatial resolution is obtained.
The distance Z from input/output end 52 of sensing optical fiber 50 to the position where probe light 32 is reflected is given by:
where t is the time between launching the probe light 32 and receiving the reflected probe light 32R, ng is the group index of the guided mode of sensing optical fiber 50 into which the probe light 32 is launched, and c is the light speed in vacuum.
The spatial resolution ΔZ is determined by the probe light pulse width τ:
A probe light pulse width of T=100 ns corresponds to a spatial resolution of ΔZ=10 m. To get a spatial resolution of less than 1 m, the probe light pulse width T should be less than 10 ns. In various embodiments, the probe light pulse width τ is less than 5 ns and is less than 1 ns. In various embodiments, the probe light pulse width is between 0.1 ns to 5 ns and is between 0.1 ns to 1 ns.
In a second embodiment that employs counter-propagating pump light 22 and 22′, the two pump light beams comprise short pump-light pulses selected to generate a stable BDG 54 having a broadband Brillouin gain (i.e., a broadband BDG 54) at the place where two short counter-propagating pump pulses overlap in the time domain.
The distance of this location from input/output end 52 of sensing optical fiber 50 is:
where Δt is the time delay between launching the pump-light pulses 22 and 22′. The spatial resolution ΔZ is determined by the pulse width τS of the longer pump pulse:
Probe light 32 with a narrow spectral bandwidth is used to determine temperature and strain at different locations. The measured spectrum of reflected probe light 32 is the convolution of the probe light spectrum and the BDG reflection spectrum. This allows narrow-linewidth probe light 32 to be used to obtain a narrow spectral width of the measured spectrum reflected probe light 32R, which enables a relatively high degree of measurement sensitivity of temperature or strain. Therefore, a high spatial resolution ΔZ and a high degree of measurement sensitivity can be obtained simultaneously using the systems and methods disclosed herein.
In practice, the spatial resolution ΔZ is a function of the sensing distance Z (i.e., the distance from input/output end 52 of sensing optical fiber 50). Table 1 below lists example sensing distances Z along with the corresponding spatial resolution ΔZ that can be obtained using the systems and methods described herein.
Evolution of Probe Power and Reflected Probe Power
The evolution of the optical power of the pump light 22 and reflected probe light 32R can be obtained by solving the nonlinear Maxwell equations. The results show that the power changes are related to design parameters of sensing optical fiber 50 through a factor F, which is defined by:
where Īupp and Īuss are the overlap integrals defined by
Aeffpp and Aeffss are the optical effective areas for pumps and probe/probe
In the above equations, E0 and ES are the electrical fields of the pump light 22 and probe light 32, respectively, ρu is the acoustic field generated by the pump light, and the symbol * denotes the complex conjugate of the fields. The factor F shows how the fibers design impacts the power propagation of probe light 32 and reflected probe light 32R, and can be used to optimize the design of sensing optical fiber 50 for a particular sensing application. Generally speaking, a smaller value of F means more effective interactions between BDG 54, pump light 22 and probe light 32.
Example Designs for Sensing Optical Fiber
In an example, sensing optical fiber 50 is configured to support two or more guided modes by increasing the cutoff wavelengths of the higher-order guided modes.
Tables 2 through Table 4 below set forth a total of eight example designs for sensing optical fiber 50. All the Examples have step-index profiles. The core Δ is in the range of 0.25% to 1%, and the core radius r is between 4 to 10 microns. Examples 1 through 5 have two guided modes, LP01 and LP11. The overlap between the fundamental optical guided mode and the fundamental acoustic guided mode is about 0.99, and the overlap between the LP11 guided mode and the fundamental acoustic guided mode is about 0.4 for all the five examples. However, a higher core Δ allows for smaller core radii r. As a result, the effective areas for the LP01 and LP11 guided modes become smaller, which results in smaller F factors and better system efficiency.
Examples 6-8 have 4 or 5 guided modes. If the LP01 guided mode is used to guide pump light 22, then probe light 32 will be guided by the LP11, LP02, or LP21 guided modes, a combination thereof. If a combination of the higher-order guided modes is used to carry probe light 32, the reflected probe light 32R will have multiple peaks at different wavelengths. Also as shown in Examples 6 and 8, a higher-order guided mode, e.g. LP11, can be used to carry pump light 22. In this case, the fundamental guided mode LP01 or another higher order guided mode can be used to carry probe light 32. Again, Examples 6-8 show higher values for Δ that enable a smaller F factor and thus higher system efficiency.
Experimental Results
Experiments were carried out on system 10 of
All optical fibers 60 used in the two MOPAs constituting the pump and probe light sources 20 and 30 were single-guided-mode. Probe light source 30 utilized free-space optical coupling (see, e.g., light-coupling optical system 80 of
It is noted that the excited guided mode(s) supported by multimode sensing optical fiber 50 can be selected by the proper setting of the offset between the output single-mode fiber pigtail of the probe MOPA and the input multimode fiber pigtail (fiber section F2) of multimode coupler 40-2. The 1×2 multimode fiber coupler 40-1 then combines the probe light 32 with the pump light 22 as described above. The combined pump light 22 and probe light 32 were launched into sensing optical fiber 50 through a multimode fiber optical circulator 42 (see
The coupling ratios of both couplers 40-1 and 40-2 were approximately 50:50. The output single-mode fiber pigtail of the pump MOPA and the input multimode fiber pigtail of the second coupler was center-to-center spliced in order to excite only the fundamental guided mode in sensing optical fiber 50. Thus, in
First Experiment
In a first experiment, sensing optical fiber 50 was 16.16 km long and supported a fundamental guided mode LP01 and one high-order guided mode LP11. The guided mode-field diameter of the fundamental guided mode was 14.2 μm, and the loss at 1550 nm was 0.188 dB/km. The pump light 22 was carried only in the LP01. Also, by properly setting the offset between the output single-mode fiber pigtail (optical fiber 60) of the MOPA probe light source 32 and the input multimode fiber pigtail (fiber section F2) of the multimode coupler, the probe light 32 excited only the LP11 guided mode.
The wavelength difference Δλ between pump light 22 and probe light 32 is about 1.444 nm, corresponding to an effective index different between LP01 and LP11 guided modes being ˜1.329×10−3. Since the probe SBS and the reflected probe light 32R have the same wavelength, it should be confirmed that the wavelength peak at −1548.78 nm is not arising from the probe SBS, but from the reflection of BDG 54 formed by the pump light 22.
To perform such confirmation, the optical spectra of the reflected light from sensing optical fiber 50 was measured for two different operating states of system 10: 1) pump amplifier 26 on and probe light source 30 on and 2) pump amplifier 26 is off, and probe light source 30 on.
The measured spectra for these two operational states are shown in
Second Experiment
In the second experiment, a 5.5 km long sensing optical fiber 50 was used. The sensing optical fiber 50 has a step-index profile with index difference Δ between the core 56 and the clad 58 of about 0.34%, and the core radius of about r=6.9 μm. The guided mode-field diameter of the fundamental guided mode is ˜12.8 μm. Sensing optical fiber 50 was configured to support only a fundamental guided mode (LP01) and one high-order guided mode (LP11).
The pump light 22 was introduced into sensing optical fiber 50 such that it only traveled in the LP01 guided mode. By properly setting the offset between the output single-mode fiber pigtail of the MOPA probe light source 30 (i.e., single-mode optical fiber 60) and the input multimode fiber pigtail of the multimode coupler (i.e., fiber section F2), the probe light 32 was made to excite only the LP11 guided mode.
Again, the reflection peak of the probe light 32, which has 0.09 nm up-shift (Brillouin wavelength shift ΔλB) from the probe wavelength, is clearly observed.
Third Experiment
In above two experiments, the order of the probe guided mode (LP11) is higher than that of the pump guided mode (LP01). In a third experiment, the guided mode used for probe light 32 was lower than that for pump light 22.
In the third experiment, the experimental setup was essentially same as that shown in
Sensing optical fiber 50 was 10 km long, had a guided mode-field diameter of about 12 μm, and supported just a fundamental guided mode (LP01) and one high-order guided mode (LP11). The index difference Δ between core 56 and cladding 58 was about 0.4%. Pump light 22 was provided to sensing optical fiber 50 such that it was carried in the LP11 guided mode. The probe light 32 was provided to sensing optical fiber 50 such that it was supported by the LP01 guided mode.
Fourth Experiment
In above three experiments, the both probe light 32 and pump light 22 were CW. In a fourth experiment, the probe light was pulsed with 1 ns pulse width. System 10 was configured essentially the same as shown in
Again, the reflection peak of the probe light 32, which has a 0.09 nm up-shift (Brillouin wavelength shift ΔλB) from the probe wavelength, is clearly observed.
Although the disclosure has been illustrated and described herein with reference to embodiments and specific examples thereof, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments and examples can perform similar functions and/or achieve like results. All such equivalent embodiments and examples are within the spirit and scope of the disclosure and are intended to be covered by the appended claims. It will also be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the same. Thus, it is intended that the present disclosure cover the modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7113659 | Taverner | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7245790 | Brown et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7284903 | Hartog | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7355163 | Watley et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7480460 | Colpitts et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7529434 | Taverner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20080253428 | MacDougall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110019179 | Molin et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0951641 | Apr 2002 | EP |
2008056143 | May 2008 | WO |
2010085605 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Brillouin distributed time-domain sensing in optical fibers: state of the art and perspectives”; Thevenaz; Front. Optoelectron. China 2010, 3(1): 13-21. |
“Development of a distributed sensing technique using brillouin scattering”; Horiguchi et al; Journal of Lightwave Technology; vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1995. |
“Distributed sensing using stimulated Brillouin scattering: towards ultimate resolution”; Fellay et al; Reprinted with permission from the 12th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors; 1997 OSA Technical Digest Series; vol. 16; Optical Society of America. |
“Experimental and theoretical studies on a distributed temperature sensor based on brillouin scattering”; Bao et al; Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 13, No. 7, Jul. 1995; 1340-1348. |
“Automated system for distributed sensing”; DeMerchant et al; Department of Civil Engineering; University of New Brunswick, pp. 315-322, Mar. 1998. |
“High-resolution brillouin optical time domain analysis based on brillouin dynamic grating”; Song et al; Optics Letters; vol. 35, No. 1, Jan. 1, 2010; p. 52-54. |
International Search Report in counterpart application PCT/US12/32952 issued Aug. 3, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120274926 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |