The present invention relates generally to communications and particularly to communications through a distributed antenna system.
Various types of wireless communication systems have become prevalent around the world. For example, cellular communication systems cover most major metropolitan areas as well as major highways through remote areas. Cellular systems permit individuals with cellular handsets to communicate with base stations that are connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or some other communication network.
As with any communication system, cellular systems can leave coverage “holes” where the signal from the base stations cannot reach. The holes can be in tunnels, valleys, city streets between tall buildings, or any other location where a radio frequency (RF) signal is blocked.
Placing additional base stations where these coverage holes are located is not always an option. Base stations tend to be very expensive due not only to the cost of the equipment but also because of land acquisition costs. Additionally, large base station antennas may not fit within an area either physically or aesthetically.
One solution to hole coverage is to use smaller remote antennas where coverage is needed but a base station is not warranted or desired. One problem with remote antennas, however, is that coaxial cable cannot be run long distances due to attenuation. Remote antennas are difficult to install along a highway or through a tunnel due to this attenuation problem. Using repeaters may not be an option since this only adds to the expense and complexity of the system. There is a resulting need in the art for a distributed antenna system that does not suffer from attenuation problems.
The embodiments of the present invention encompass a distributed digital antenna system that has a host unit for converting radio frequency signals to digital optical signals and digital optical signals to radio frequency signals. The digital optical signals are transmitted over an optical medium to a plurality of remote units that are daisy-chained along the optical medium. Each remote unit transmits an analog representation of the digital optical signals from the host unit and receives radio frequency signals that are converted by the remote unit to digital optical signals for use by the host unit.
The embodiments of the present invention provide a digital distributed antenna system that enables a communication system to fill coverage holes without the expense of additional base stations. This is accomplished by distributing a fiber optic cable through the area in which coverage is desired and tapping into the fiber at desired antenna locations.
The embodiments of the present invention refer to fiber optics as a means of communication between remote units and the host unit. However, any optical medium, such as a laser through the air, can be substituted for the optical fiber.
The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station (100) transmits to a subscriber unit wireless terminal (150). The subscriber unit (150) transmits back to the base station (100) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (150) is either a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
The base station (100) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (150) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (130). In one embodiment, the base station also links the subscriber unit (150) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (100) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.
A host unit (101) is connected to the base station (100) through an RF link (115). In one embodiment, this link (115) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/619,431, assigned to ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and incorporated herein by reference, discusses digital RF signals.
The host unit (101) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (100) to an optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (101) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (100). In other embodiments, the host unit (101) performs additional functions.
One or more remote units (105-108) are connected to the host unit (101) through an optical medium, such as fiber optic lines (120 and 125), in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (105-108) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (100). The remote units (105-108) communicate with subscriber units in a particular remote unit's coverage area over an RF link provided by the remote unit antennas (135-138).
For purposes of illustration, four remote units (105-108) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units. If only a small geographic area requires coverage, as few as one remote unit (105) is used. If a highway in a remote area requires additional coverage, more than four remote units are typically used.
The embodiment of
The fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units (105-108) carries the digital optical signal for transmission by the (105-108). The fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105-108) carries a digital optical signal comprising the sum of the received signals from each of the remote units (105-108). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.
The system of
The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station (200) transmits to a subscriber unit (250). The subscriber unit (250) transmits back to the base station (200) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (250) may be a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
The base station (200) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (250) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (230). The base station may also link the subscriber unit (250) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (200) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.
A host unit (201) is connected to the base station (200) through an RF link (215). In one embodiment, this link (215) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals.
The host unit (201) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (200) to a digital optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (201) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (200). In other embodiments, the host unit (201) performs additional functions.
One or more remote units (205-208) are connected to the host unit (201) through an optical medium, such as a fiber optic line (220), that is connected in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (205-208) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (200).
For purposes of illustration, four remote units (205-208) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units.
The embodiment of
The remote unit (105) transmits and receives RF signals over the antenna (135). Both the receive and transmit circuitry is connected to the antenna (135) through a diplexer (301).
Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area.
An analog signal that is received on the antenna (135) is split off by the diplexer (301) to an analog-to-digital converter (305). The analog-to-digital converter (305) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.
The digitized received signal is input to a summer (315) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The input of the summer (315), therefore, is coupled to an output of a previous remote unit. The output of the summer (315) is a summation signal that is coupled to either the input of a subsequent remote unit or to the host unit. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (105-108) of the system.
A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (310). The digital-to-analog converter (310) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (135).
Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are located at the optical ports (330 and 335) of the remote unit (105). Each optical port (330 and 335) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (320-323).
Since the remote unit (105) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (330 and 335), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (105). The Optical-to-Electrical converters (320-323) are also responsible for converting received electrical signals from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
The remote unit (205) transmits and receives RF signals over the antenna (435). Both the receive and transmit circuitry are connected to the antenna (435) through a diplexer (401).
Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three sectors of an area.
An analog signal that is received on the antenna (435) is split off by the diplexer (401) to an analog-to-digital converter (405). The analog-to-digital converter (405) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.
The digitized received signal is input to a summer (415) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (205-208) of the system.
A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (410). The digital-to-analog converter (410) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (435).
Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are located at the optical ports (440 and 445) of the remote unit (205). Each optical port (440 and 445) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (420-423).
Since the remote unit (205) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (440 and 445), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (205). The Optical-to-Electrical converters (420-423) are also responsible for converting received electrical signals from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
A wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) (430 and 431) is located at each optical port (440 and 445). The WDMs (430 and 431) perform the optical processing necessary to combine several optical signals having several wavelengths. The WDMs (430 and 431) also perform the optical demultiplexing necessary to split the multiple wavelengths of a single fiber to their own signal paths.
In summary, the distributed digital antenna system provides multiple daisy-chained antennas on a single medium such as optical fiber. The fiber can be tapped anywhere along its length multiple times to provide economical radio coverage in areas where a base station would be cost prohibitive.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
This applicationNotice: More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,789. The reissue applications are reissue application Ser. No. 15/436,605 filed on Feb. 17, 2017; and this continuation reissue application Ser. No. (the present continuation reissue application). All reissue applications are reissues of the same issued U.S. Pat. No. 8,958,789 (application Ser. No. 10/395,743 filed Mar. 24, 2003), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/430,434 filed Dec. 3, 2002, and titled “Distributed Digital Antenna System,” which is commonly assigned and incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3783385 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3931473 | Ferris, Jr. | Jan 1976 | A |
4101834 | Stutt et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4112488 | Smith, III | Sep 1978 | A |
4144409 | Utano et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4144411 | Frenkiel | Mar 1979 | A |
4183054 | Patisaul et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4231116 | Sekiguchi et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4244046 | Brouard et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4354167 | Terreault et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4402076 | Krajewski | Aug 1983 | A |
4451699 | Gruenberg | May 1984 | A |
4451916 | Casper et al. | May 1984 | A |
4456793 | Baker et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4475010 | Huensch et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4485486 | Webb et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4525861 | Freeburg | Jun 1985 | A |
4531239 | Usui | Jul 1985 | A |
4556760 | Goldman | Dec 1985 | A |
4596051 | Feldman | Jun 1986 | A |
4611323 | Hessenmuller | Sep 1986 | A |
4613990 | Halpern | Sep 1986 | A |
4628501 | Loscoe | Dec 1986 | A |
4654843 | Roza et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4667319 | Chum | May 1987 | A |
4669107 | Eriksson-Lennartsson | May 1987 | A |
4691292 | Rothweiler | Sep 1987 | A |
4701909 | Kavehrad et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4704733 | Kawano | Nov 1987 | A |
4718004 | Dalal | Jan 1988 | A |
4726644 | Mathis | Feb 1988 | A |
4754451 | Eng et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4755795 | Page | Jul 1988 | A |
4759000 | Reitz | Jul 1988 | A |
4759051 | Han | Jul 1988 | A |
4759057 | De Luca et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760573 | Calvignac et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4779064 | Monser | Oct 1988 | A |
4790000 | Kinoshita | Dec 1988 | A |
4797947 | Labedz | Jan 1989 | A |
4812846 | Noro | Mar 1989 | A |
4816825 | Chan et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4831662 | Kuhn | May 1989 | A |
4849963 | Kawano et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4868862 | Ryoichi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4881082 | Graziano | Nov 1989 | A |
4916460 | Powell | Apr 1990 | A |
4920533 | Dufresne et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4932049 | Lee | Jun 1990 | A |
4959829 | Griesing | Sep 1990 | A |
4977593 | Ballance | Dec 1990 | A |
4999831 | Grace | Mar 1991 | A |
5067147 | Lee | Nov 1991 | A |
5067173 | Gordon et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5084869 | Russell | Jan 1992 | A |
5134709 | Bi et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5136410 | Heiling et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5138440 | Radice | Aug 1992 | A |
5159479 | Takagi | Oct 1992 | A |
5164914 | Anderson | Nov 1992 | A |
5175867 | Wejke et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5193109 | Chien-Yeh Lee | Mar 1993 | A |
5243598 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5251053 | Heidemann | Oct 1993 | A |
5265039 | Curbelo et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267261 | Blakeney, II et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5272700 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278690 | Vella-Coleiro | Jan 1994 | A |
5280472 | Gilhousen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5285469 | Vanderpool | Feb 1994 | A |
5297193 | Bouix et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299198 | Kay et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301056 | O'Neill | Apr 1994 | A |
5303287 | Laborde | Apr 1994 | A |
5305308 | English et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309474 | Gilhousen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313461 | Ahl et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321736 | Beasley | Jun 1994 | A |
5321849 | Lemson | Jun 1994 | A |
5339184 | Tang | Aug 1994 | A |
5379455 | Koschek | Jan 1995 | A |
5381459 | Lappington | Jan 1995 | A |
5392453 | Gudmundson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5400391 | Emura et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5442681 | Kotzin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442700 | Snell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5457557 | Zarem et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461627 | Rypinski | Oct 1995 | A |
5499047 | Terry et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513176 | Dean et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519691 | Darcie et al. | May 1996 | A |
5528582 | Bodeep et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533011 | Dean et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5545397 | Spielvogel et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552920 | Glynn | Sep 1996 | A |
5566168 | Dent | Oct 1996 | A |
5579341 | Smith et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5586121 | Moura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587734 | Lauder et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592470 | Rudrapatna et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603080 | Källander et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606736 | Hasler et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619202 | Wilson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5621730 | Kelley | Apr 1997 | A |
5621786 | Fischer et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627879 | Russell et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630204 | Hylton et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631757 | Bodeep et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642405 | Fischer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644622 | Russell et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657374 | Russell et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682256 | Motley et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708961 | Hylton et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715235 | Sawahashi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724385 | Levin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732076 | Ketseoglou et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748683 | Smith et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752170 | Clifford | May 1998 | A |
5761619 | Danne et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765097 | Dail | Jun 1998 | A |
5765099 | Georges et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771449 | Blasing et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774085 | Yanagimoto et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774789 | Van der Kaay et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781541 | Schneider | Jul 1998 | A |
5781859 | Beasley | Jul 1998 | A |
5781865 | Gammon | Jul 1998 | A |
5802173 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805983 | Naidu et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809395 | Hamilton-Piercy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809422 | Raleigh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809431 | Bustamante et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812605 | Smith et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818883 | Smith et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822324 | Kostresti et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5852651 | Fischer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5874914 | Krasner | Feb 1999 | A |
5878325 | Dail | Mar 1999 | A |
5880863 | Rideout et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883882 | Schwartz | Mar 1999 | A |
5907544 | Rypinski | May 1999 | A |
5930682 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5946622 | Bojeryd | Aug 1999 | A |
5969837 | Farber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978650 | Fischer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987014 | Magill et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005506 | Bazarjani et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005884 | Cook et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009130 | Lurey et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014366 | Ichiyoshi | Jan 2000 | A |
6034950 | Sauer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061089 | Tonkin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6108113 | Fee | Aug 2000 | A |
6108550 | Wiorek et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108626 | Cellario et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112086 | Wala | Aug 2000 | A |
6122529 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128470 | Naidu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128471 | Quelch et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147786 | Pan | Nov 2000 | A |
6150993 | Dobrovolny | Nov 2000 | A |
6157659 | Bird | Dec 2000 | A |
6181687 | Bisdikian | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188693 | Murakami | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192216 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198558 | Graves et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6222660 | Traa | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223021 | Silvia et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226274 | Reese et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253094 | Schmutz | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259910 | Fairfield et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262981 | Schmutz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263135 | Wade | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275990 | Dapper et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298246 | Lysejko et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307877 | Philips et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308085 | Shoki | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317884 | Eames et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336042 | Dawson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337754 | Imajo | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349200 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353600 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356369 | Farhan | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356374 | Farhan | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362908 | Kimbrough et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373611 | Farhan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373887 | Aiyagari et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374124 | Slabinski | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377640 | Trans | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6442405 | Hiramatsu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449071 | Farhan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463301 | Bevan et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466572 | Ethridge et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480551 | Ohishi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480702 | Sabat, Jr. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486907 | Farber et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496546 | Allpress et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498936 | Raith | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504831 | Greenwood et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535720 | Kintis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567473 | Tzannes | May 2003 | B1 |
6580905 | Naidu et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594496 | Schwartz | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6622013 | Miyoshi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643498 | Miyajima | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6667973 | Gorshe et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674966 | Koonen | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697603 | Lovinggood et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704545 | Wala | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6729929 | Sayers et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6731904 | Judd | May 2004 | B1 |
6738581 | Handelman | May 2004 | B2 |
6745003 | Maca et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751417 | Combs et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768745 | Gorshe et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771933 | Eng et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785558 | Stratford et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6799020 | Heidmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801767 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6807374 | Imajo et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826163 | Mani et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826164 | Mani et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831901 | Millar | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6865390 | Goss et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6907048 | Treadaway et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917614 | Laubach et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6963552 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967966 | Donohue | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6980831 | Matsuyoshi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7016308 | Gallagher | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7031335 | Donohue et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7035671 | Solum | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7047313 | Broerman | May 2006 | B1 |
7075369 | Takenaka | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103279 | Koh et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7103377 | Bauman et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127175 | Mani et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7171244 | Bauman | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184728 | Solum | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190903 | Combs et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7205864 | Schultz, Jr. et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215651 | Millar | May 2007 | B2 |
7257328 | Levinson et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7289972 | Rieser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7313415 | Wake et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7359447 | Sage | Apr 2008 | B2 |
RE40564 | Fischer et al. | Nov 2008 | E |
7505747 | Solum | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512419 | Solum | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7539509 | Bauman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7548695 | Wake | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7610046 | Wala | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7614074 | Mobley et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7639982 | Wala | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7702985 | Millar | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7761093 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
5627879 | Russell et al. | Sep 2010 | C1 |
5657374 | Russell et al. | Sep 2010 | C1 |
7848747 | Wala | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7848770 | Scheinert | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7917177 | Bauman | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920858 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7962111 | Solum | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8019221 | Zancewicz | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8032916 | Oyadomari et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8160570 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8290483 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8326218 | Wala | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8346091 | Kummetz et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
RE43964 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2013 | E |
8446530 | Bellers | May 2013 | B2 |
8559939 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8577286 | Wala | Nov 2013 | B2 |
RE45321 | Fischer et al. | Jan 2015 | E |
8958410 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958789 | Bauman et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9332402 | Wala | May 2016 | B2 |
9467876 | Kummetz et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9867052 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10075243 | Fischer et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10321328 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10498434 | Wala | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10505635 | Wala | Dec 2019 | B2 |
RE49377 | Bauman et al. | Jan 2023 | E |
20010031014 | Subramanian et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036163 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020003645 | Kim et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020072329 | Bandeira et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020167954 | Highsmith et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191565 | Mani et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030015943 | Kim et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043928 | Ling et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060178 | Ghassemzadeh et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066087 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030133182 | Ng et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030143947 | Lyu | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157943 | Sabat, Jr. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162516 | Solum | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040010609 | Vilander et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037565 | Young et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040198453 | Cutrer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203339 | Bauman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219950 | Pallonen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050007993 | Chambers et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050131645 | Panopoulos | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147067 | Mani et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050201323 | Mani et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243785 | Sabat, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050250503 | Cutrer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060121944 | Buscaglia et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060193295 | White et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070166036 | Combs et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090034979 | Zancewicz | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067841 | Combs et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100061291 | Wala | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110182583 | Rakib | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110265140 | Rakib | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130122952 | Wala | May 2013 | A1 |
20140016583 | Smith | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036758 | Wala | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20160056874 | Wala | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20170026857 | Kummetz et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20180278299 | Morrison | Sep 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008900 | Oct 1990 | CA |
2008900 | Jan 1998 | CA |
1127056 | Jul 1996 | CN |
1127056 | Jul 1996 | CN |
1362799 | Aug 2002 | CN |
3707244 | Sep 1988 | DE |
3707244 | Jan 1990 | DE |
0166885 | Jan 1986 | EP |
0346925 | Dec 1989 | EP |
0368673 | May 1990 | EP |
0391597 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0468688 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0642243 | Mar 1995 | EP |
0346925 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0664621 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0664621 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0876073 | Nov 1998 | EP |
1334630 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2290850 | Mar 2011 | EP |
1303929 | Oct 2011 | EP |
1303929 | Oct 2011 | EP |
1570626 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2290850 | May 2016 | EP |
3035562 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2345865 | Oct 1977 | FR |
2345865 | Oct 1977 | FR |
2253770 | Sep 1992 | GB |
2289198 | Nov 1995 | GB |
2300549 | Nov 1996 | GB |
2315959 | Feb 1998 | GB |
2320653 | Jun 1998 | GB |
540424 | Apr 1957 | IT |
58-164007 | Sep 1983 | JP |
58164007 | Sep 1983 | JP |
3-26031 | Feb 1991 | JP |
3026031 | Feb 1991 | JP |
512374 | Jan 1993 | JP |
512374 | Jan 1993 | JP |
H05153021 | Jun 1993 | JP |
H05268128 | Oct 1993 | JP |
6318905 | Nov 1994 | JP |
8510878 | Nov 1996 | JP |
11234200 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2002354534 | Dec 2002 | JP |
19990064537 | Aug 1999 | KR |
1020000060899 | Oct 2000 | KR |
1020010018675 | Mar 2001 | KR |
20010048227 | Jun 2001 | KR |
1020010048227 | Jun 2001 | KR |
100594770 | Jun 2006 | KR |
9115927 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9115927 | Oct 1991 | WO |
9428690 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9533350 | Dec 1995 | WO |
9628946 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9705704 | Feb 1997 | WO |
9716000 | May 1997 | WO |
9732442 | Sep 1997 | WO |
9824256 | Jun 1998 | WO |
9837715 | Aug 1998 | WO |
9937035 | Jul 1999 | WO |
9948312 | Sep 1999 | WO |
0021221 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0021337 | Apr 2000 | WO |
0156197 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0174013 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0174100 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0209319 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0209319 | Jan 2002 | WO |
0239624 | May 2002 | WO |
02067468 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2004051322 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2004051322 | Jun 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Dec. 29, 2009, pp. Cover through 116, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Dec. 29, 2009, pp. Cover through 115, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Dec. 4, 2012, pp. Cover through 105, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Nov. 5, 2013, pp. Cover through 72, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Petition for Inter Partes Review under 37 C.F.R § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, May 3, 2016, pp. Cover through 87, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, from U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Wala, “A New Microcell Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport”, cited in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 12, 2021, 26 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
Wala, “A New Microcell Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport”, 1993, 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Secaucus, NJ, US, May 18-20, 1993, pp. 585 through 588. |
Wikipedia, “Free Lossless Audio Codec”, Nov. 7, 2021, 7 Page(s), https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Lossless_Audio_Codec&oldid=217065127. |
Wikipedia, “Global System for Mobile Communications”, Jan. 9, 2019, pp. 1 through 24, Wikipedia. |
Wikipedia, “Summation”, Dec. 18, 2018, pp. 1 through 11, Wikipedia. |
Wikipedia, “T-carrier”, Oct. 21, 2018, pp. 1 through 6, Wikipedia. |
Wikipedia, “Uplink”, May 10, 2019, pp. 1 through 6, https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uplink&oldid=188425198. |
Zhaohui et al., “A Rake Type Receiver Structure for CDMA Mobile Communication Systems Using Antenna Arrays”, IEEE, 1996, pp. 528 through 530. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1 through 4, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Aug. 19, 1997, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129, Oct. 17, 1996, pp. 1 through 6, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Aug. 12, 2003, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jun. 4, 2014, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 12, 2014, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Aug. 13, 2009, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Sep. 17, 2012, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215, Aug. 2, 2012, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948, Jul. 3, 2013, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Aug. 14, 2015, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Dec. 22, 2015, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Jul. 17, 2019, pp. 1-13, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Nov. 28, 2016, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Apr. 11, 2019, pp. 1-96, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Apr. 14, 2022, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, May 6, 2021, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Aug. 17, 2022, pp. 1 through 39, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Jul. 16, 2019, pp. 1-7, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response”, U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, Aug. 18, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1 through 18, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request For Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Mar. 12, 2009, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1 through 16, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Dec. 6, 2010, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Panel Decision from Pre-Appeal Brief Review”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 9, 2009, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 18, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 32, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1 through 17, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/065,652, May 29, 1995, pp. 1 through 7, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Jul. 17, 1995, pp. 1 through 5, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Apr. 4, 1995, pp. 1 through 14, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 26, 1995, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742, May 27, 1996, pp. 1-5, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742, Oct. 25, 1995, pp. 1 through 6, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Feb. 19, 1997, pp. 1 through 9, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Apr. 9, 1996, pp. 1 through 3, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129, Jan. 23, 1996, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 1 through 15, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Oct. 6, 2005, pp. 1 through 10, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273, Mar. 30, 2004, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jan. 14, 2010, pp. 1 through 31, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jan. 30, 2006, pp. 1 through 15, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 28, 2005, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Apr. 4, 2007, pp. 1 through 11, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 21, 2008, pp. 1-14, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Aug. 10, 2016, pp. 1 through 35, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 15, 2007, pp. 1-16, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 18, 2009, pp. 1-23, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Feb. 27, 2009, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Apr. 3, 2008, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Aug. 24, 2006, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Feb. 17, 2011, pp. 1 through 13, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215, Apr. 11, 2012, pp. 1 through 12, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948, Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1 through 23, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1 through 28, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Apr. 29, 2015, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Apr. 25, 2018, pp. 1 through 38, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Apr. 28, 2017, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Jan. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 23, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Feb. 28, 2018, pp. 1-9, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Sep. 8, 2021, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Oct. 24, 2019, pp. 1-34, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Oct. 11, 2017, pp. 1-15, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Dec. 17, 2018, pp. 1-23, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362, Apr. 17, 2009 pp. 1 through 8, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting / Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Apr. 17, 2009 pp. 1 through 10, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1-13, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866, Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223, Apr. 11, 2016, pp. 1 through 4, Published: US. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227 in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review”, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 12, 2021, 25 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01394, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402, From U.S. Appl. No. 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, From U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, From U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, From U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Decision Settlement Prior to Institution of Trial” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01393, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. 1 through 5, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,577,286, From U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Declaration of Maria P. Garcia Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.68” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Oct. 6, 2020, 72 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Declaration of R. Jacob Baker, Ph.D. P.E Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.100” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Aug. 11, 2021, 440 Pages, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Joint Motion to Dismiss the Petitions” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR Nos. 2021-01390, 2021-01391, 2021-01392, 2021-01393, 2021-01394, Nov. 10, 2021, pp. 1 through 6, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982, 8,326,218, 8,577,286, and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Interpartes Review, IPR No. 2021-01390, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 4, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01391, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 4, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,639,982, from U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944. |
USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board, “Patent Owner's Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R § 42.8” in SOLiD, Inc. v. CommScope Technologies LLC Inter Partes Review, IPR No. 2021-01392, Sep. 2, 2021, pp. Cover through 3, Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,326,218, from U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice of Reexamination” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Jun. 21, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 18, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9, Aug. 19, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 6, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN Application No. 20071053587.X, May 28, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 3, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN 200910005002.9, Aug. 19, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 6, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention”, from CN Application No. 200380109396.3, Jun. 29, 2010, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 4, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Jul. 8, 2005, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Nov. 2, 2010, rom Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 9, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Reexamination Decision Revoking Decision of Rejection” from CN Application No. 200710153587.X, Nov. 30, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 14, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, May 11, 2007, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 5, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587.X, Feb. 4, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Second Office Action” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9, Jan. 23, 2013, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 11, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Third Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Oct, 26, 2007, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN. |
Steele, “Towards a high-capacity digital cellular mobile radio system”, IEE Proceedings˜F, Special Issue on Land Mobile Radio, Aug. 1985, vol. 132, Part F, No. 5, pp. 405-415. |
Stern et al., “Passive Optical Local Networks for Telephony Applications and Beyond” Electronics Letters: an International Publication, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Nov. 19, 1987, vol. 23, No. 24, pp. 1255-1257. |
Tang, “Fiber Optic Antenna Remoting for Multi-Sector Cellular Cell Sites”, GTE Laboratories, at least as early as 070/9/1993, pp. 1 through 22. |
Tang, “Fiber-Optic Antenna Remoting for MultiSector Cellular Cell Sites”, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, Jan. 1, 1992, pp. 76 through 81, Published in: US. |
TE Connectivity, “Innovative Solution to Cut Costs of Delivering Mobile Ultra-broadband Access”, Feb. 20, 2014, https://www.ecnmag.cominews/2014/02/innovative-solution-cut-costs-delivering-mobile-ultra-broadband-access, pp. 1 through 4. |
Tektronix, “Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)”, International Engineering Consortium, as downloaded on Aug. 28, 2002 from http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/sonet/topic03.html, pp. 1 through 5. |
The International Search Authority, “International Search Report from PCT/US94/05897”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 31, 1994, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO. |
Titch, “Kentrox boosts coverage and capacity”, Telephony, Jan. 25, 1993, pp. 11 through-12. |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Anthony Acampora Addressing Validity of CommScope's Asserted Patents, including U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,332,402 (the '402 patent); 8,577,286 (the '286 patent); 8,326,218 (the '218 patent); 7,639,982 (the '982 patent); and 7,848,747 (“the '747 patent”), in CommScope Technologies v. SOLiD Gear, Inc. and SOLiD, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00477-M, 46 Pages, Re: U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, “Complaint for Patent Infringement”, in CommScope Technologies v. SOLiD Gear, Inc. and SOLiD, Inc., Case 3:16-cv-00477-M, May 18, 2022, pp. 1 through 32, Re: U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,982; 8,326,218; 8,877,286; and 9,332,402 from U.S. Appl. Nos. 10/740,944, 12/617,215, 13/662,948, and 14/054,223. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Nov. 3, 2011, pp. 1 through 2, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Jun. 2, 2020, pp. 1 through 7, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Decision on Appeal”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Mar. 20, 2014, pp. 1-6, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Examiner's Answer”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 4, 2011, pp. 1-29, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Jun. 12, 1996, pp. 1 through 8, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Jul. 21, 2010, pp. 1-23, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Nov. 17, 2008, pp. 1-15, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Aug. 20, 2009, pp. 1-22, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 1, 2006, pp. 1-12, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Feb. 5, 2007, pp. 1 through 16, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 1 through 19, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Jul. 18, 2007, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Oct. 3, 2007, pp. 1 through 22, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944, Oct. 14, 2008, pp. 1 through 25, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1 through 14, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Oct. 30, 2017, pp. 1 through 33, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Dec. 4, 2018, pp. 1-59, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/436,605, Mar. 9, 2020, pp. 1 through 24, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363, Jun. 23, 2010, pp. 1 through 21, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, dated Jun. 4, 2018, pp. 1-88, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 22, 2008, pp. 1-3, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Aug. 20, 2008, pp. 1-2, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Nov. 16, 2016, pp. 1-11, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-13, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/144,219, Sep. 29, 2017, pp. 1-14, Published: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Interview Summary”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,432, Mar. 26, 2018, pp. 1-12, Published: US. |
IEE, “Electronics Letters an International Publication”, Nov. 19, 1987, pp. 1-4, vol. 23, No. 24, Publisher: The Institution of Electrical Engineers. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report”, from PCT/US94/05897, May 29, 1995, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, pp. 1 through 8, Published: WO. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Examination Report”, from PCT/US/01/21021, Jun. 10, 2002, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 3, Published: WO. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, from Application No. PCT/US03/38302, Dec. 14, 2001, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 10, Published: WO. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Notification of Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Dec. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10, Published: US. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion” from PCT Application No. PCT/US01/21021, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, Published: WO. |
International Preliminary Examining Authority, “Written Opinion”, from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897, from PCT Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Feb. 14, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published: WO. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report” from PCT Application No. PCT/US01/21021, Nov. 15, 2001, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: WO. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report”, from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302, from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 2, 2005, pp. 1-5, Published: WO. |
Ishida et al., “A10-GHz 8-b Multiplexer/Demultiplexer Chip Set for the SONET STS-192 System”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 26, No. 12, Dec. 1991, pp. Cover through 1943. |
Ishio et al., “A Two-Way Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission and Its Application to a Switched TV-Distribution System”, “Conference Record, Fourth European Conference on Optical Communication”, Sep. 12, 1978, pp. 645 through 665, Publisher: IIC. |
Japanese Patent Office, “Notice for Reasons for Rejection”, from JP Application No. 6-525837, from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1 through 4, Published: JP. |
Jury Verdict, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V. Commscope Connectivity LLC”, No. 3:16-cv-477, “United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division”, Jun. 20, 2019, pp. 1-19, Published in: US. |
Kobb, “Personal Wireless”, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1993, vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 4 through 5 and 20 through 25, 8, vol. 30, No. 6, Publisher: IEEE, Published in: US. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Decision to Grant from KR Application No. 2005-7010190”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-7, Published: KR. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Final Rejection” from KR2005-7010190, from Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Oct. 31, 2011, pp. 1-4, Published: KR. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “Office Action”, from KR Application No. 2005-7010190, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, Sep. 30, 2010, pp. 1-5, Published: KR. |
Lee et al., “Intelligent Microcell Applications in PCS”, “43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology”, May 20, 1993, Secaucus, NJ, USA, pp. Cover through 725, Publisher: Pactel Corporation. |
Lewis, “ADC/Kentrox Call Report with Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc.”, Oct. 18, 1992, pp. 1 through 3. |
Merrett et al., “A Cordless Access System Using Radio-Over-Fibre Techniques”, 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Gateway to the Future Technology in Motion, May 22, 1991, pp. Cover through 924. |
Microwaves & RF, “Digital transport for cellular”, Feb. 1993, p. 1. |
Nakatsugawa et al., “Software Radio Base and Personal Stations for Cellular/PCS Systems”, IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, May 18, 2000, pp. 617 through 621. |
Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-107. |
Nullity Action 114951NI934 PL/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-122. |
Oades, “The Linear RF Repeater”, ICC '80, 1980 International Conference on Communications, Seattle, WA, US, Jun. 8-12, 1980, pp. 1 through 1, IEEE. |
O'Byrne, “TDMA and CDMA in a Fiber-Optic Environment”, IEEE 38th Vehicular Technology Conference, Jun. 1992, pp. 727 through 731. |
Patent Office P.R. China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application 94192782.2, Sep. 29, 2000, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, pp. 1 through 4, Published: CN. |
Patent Office P.R. China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Mar. 7, 2008, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN. |
Patent Office P.R. China, “Office Action” from CN Application No. 200380109396.3, Jan. 4, 2008, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN. |
Payne et al., “Single Mode Optical Local Networks”, “Globecom '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference”, Dec. 2-5, 1985, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1200 through 1206. |
Quinn, “The Cell Enhancer”, “Vehicular Technology Conference”, May 22, 1986, pp. 77 through 83, Publisher: Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems. |
Replica to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-49. |
Rosenbloom et al., “Cell Enhancer: Beyond the Outer Limits”, pp. 1 through 2. |
Russell, “New Microcell Technology Sets Cellular Carriers Free”, “Telephony Mar. 1993”, 3 Pages, Publisher: ADC Kentrox, Published in: US. |
Schneiderman, “Offshore Markets Gain in Size, Competitiveness, Even the Smallest Industry Companies Are Expanding Their Global Buisness”, Microwaves and RF, Mar. 1993, vol. 32, No. 3, 8 Pages, Publisher: Penton Publishing, Inc. |
Siala et al., “Equalization for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing System”, 1993, pp. 649 through 652, Publisher: IEEE. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Jul. 8, 2005, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published in: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 200710153587, Mar. 19, 2010, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 7, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “First Office Action” from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 , Apr. 6, 2012, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 12, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Fourth Office Action” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, Mar. 7, 2007. from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1 through 8, Published: CN. |
State Intellectual Property Office of People's Republic of China, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention” from CN Application No. 01815499.9, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Oct. 24, 2008, pp. 1-4, Published: CN. |
ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Expands RF Technology Base with Acquisition of Waseca Technology Inc.”, ADC Kentrox News Release, Jun. 9, 1993, pp. 1 through 2. |
ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was To Improve Fiber Optic T1 Links Between Cells, MTSOs” Telocator Bulletin, Feb. 1993, pp. 1 through 1, Publisher: CityCell. |
ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Innovative Wireless Network Access Solution: Cellular Subscribers Offered a New Level of Portable Service” ADC Kentrox News Release Mar. 1, 1993, pp. 1 through 3. |
ADC Kentrox, “ADC Kentrox Wireless Systems Group CityCell (TM) 824—A Positioning White Paper”, Mar. 1993, pp. 1 through 6, Publisher: CITA Trade Show. |
ADC Kentrox, “And Now a Few Words From Your Customers . . . ”, Aug. 1, 1992, pp. 1 through 4. |
ADC Kentrox, “First Field Trial Results Exceed Expectations, ADC Kentrox and Cellular One Join Force to Provide a New Level of Portable Service”, News Release, Mar. 2, 1993, pp. 1 through 2, Publisher: ADC Kentrox, Published in: Portland, OR. |
ADC Kentrox, “Photographs of ADC Kentrox City Cell 824 Components”, Publication Date Unknown, pp. 1 through 14. |
ADC Telecommunications, Wireless Systems Division, “Widen your Horizons to a World of Solutions We're Wherever in the World You Need Us to Be.”, “ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Advertisement for CityRad Cell Enhancer, CityCell Digital Fiberoptic Microcell, CitySmart Site Diversity System & CityWide”, 1994, pp. 1 through 8. |
Akos et al., “Direct Bandpass Sampling of Multiple Distinct RF Signals”, Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 983 through 988. |
Ameritech, “Broadband Optical Transport Digital Microcell Connection Service—Interface and Performance Specifications”, Issue 1, Dec. 1993, pp. Cover-26. |
Analog Devices, Inc., “Mastering the Mix in Signal Processing”, “Mixed-Signal Design Seminar”, 1991, p. 3, Publisher: Analog Devices, Inc. |
Anaren, “Anaren Microwave Components”, pp. 1 through 2. |
Annex WRST 14 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-50. |
Annex WRST 16 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-53. |
Annex WRST 17 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Annex WRST 18 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Oct. 14, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
Annex WRST 2 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Annex WRST 2 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-4. |
Annex WRST 3 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-2. |
Annex WRST 3 to the Nullity Action 114951NI934/If against EP 1570626 dated Jan. 7, 2019, pp. 1-3. |
Annex WRST 4 to the Nullity Action 114950NI934 PL/If against EP 2290850 dated Apr. 3, 2019, pp. 1-6. |
Anon, “2 GHz Repeater Built Without I-F”, “Microwaves”, Jun. 1976, 2 pages, vol. 15, No. 6, Publisher: Hayden Publishing Company Inc. |
Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property, “Technical Examination Report for BR Application No. PI0112653-9”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Apr. 17, 2018, pp. 1-6, Published in: BR. |
Brazilian Patent Office, “Office Action for Brazil Application No. PI0112653-9”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Apr. 8, 2015, pp. 1-14, Published in: BR. |
Brazilian Patent Office, “Office Action from BR Application No. PI0112653-9”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jan. 8, 2016, pp. 1 through 7, Published: BR. |
Brunner et al., “On Space-Time Rake Receiver Structures for WCDMA”, 1999, IEEE, pp. 1546 through 1551. |
Cellular Industry, The Day Group, “New Signal Transport Technology Digitizes the Cellular Band”, Dec. 22, 2000, pp. 2-3. |
Cheun, “Performance of Direct-Sequence Spread-Spectrum RAKE receivers with Random Spreading Sequences”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 45, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 1130 through 1143. |
City Cell, “CityCell 824 Host-Site User Manual”, Sep. 25, 1993, 65-61002101 Issue 1, pp. Cover through 8-34. |
City Cell, “CityCell 824 Remote-Site Manual”, Preliminary Version, Feb. 1, 1993, pp. Cover through E-2. |
City Cell, Cellular Industry, the Day Group, “ADC Kentrox CityCell Field Trial Yields Another First: Simultaneous Analog and Digital Calls”, prior to Dec. 22, 2000, 1 page. |
Citycell, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was To Improve Fiber Optic T1 Links Between Cells, MTSOs”, Telocator Bulletin, Feb. 1993, pp. 1 through 1. |
Commscope, “CommScope Completes Transformational Acquisition of TE Connectivity's Telecom, Enterprise and Wireless Businesses”, Aug. 28, 2015, pp. 1-4. |
Cox, “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Feb. 1991, pp. Cover through 335, vol. 39, No. 2, IEEE. |
Crofut, “Remote monitoring of wireless base stations”, Urgent Communications, Jun. 1, 1998, http://urgentcomm.com/print/mag/remote-monitoring-wireless-base-stations, pp. 1 through 4. |
Cyr et al., “The digital age is here—Digital radio frequency transport enhances cellular network performance”, Telephony, Jul. 5, 1993, pp. 20 through 24. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit A, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 27, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit B, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 200, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit D, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 613, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit C, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 410, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit E, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 482, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commmscope Technologies LLC—Exhibit F, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V Commscope Connectivity LLC”, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1 through 573, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published: US. |
Dali Wireless, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions to Commscope Technologies LLC, “Commscope Technologies LLC V. Dali Wireless, Inc. V. Commscope Connectivity LLC”, “United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division”, Mar. 13, 2017, pp. 1-23, No. 3:16-cv-477, Published in: US. |
Zonemaster, “Maximum Coverage for High-Capacity Locations”, “Decibel Products”, 1993, pp. 1-4, Publisher: Decibel Multimedia Microcell System. |
Derneryd et al., “Adaptive base-station antenna arrays”, Ericsson Review No. 3, 1999, pp. 132 through 137. |
Detreville et al., “A Distributed Experimental Communications System”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. Cover through 1075. |
Ericksson, “Advertisement by Ericksson”, “Telephony”, 1994, pp. 1 through 1. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 94(3)” from Application No. 03790242.6, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1 through 4, Published: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) from EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Particulars of Infringement by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/7 through B1/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Defence and Amended Counterclaim”, Aug. 20, 2021, pp. B1/13 through B1/22, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 6”, pp. B3/54 through B3/61, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 5”, pp. B3/49 through B3/53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 7”, pp. B3/62 through B3/64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 8”, pp. B3/65 through B3/66, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 9”, pp. B3/67 through B3/68, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 1”, pp. B3/70 through B3/193, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 2”, pp. B3/194 through B3/261, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defence and Counterclaim Annex 3”, pp. B3/262 through B3/266, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 1 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B3/267 through B3/272, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 2 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B3/273 through B3/281, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex 3 to the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, pp. B2/282 through B2/289, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C1-2 through C1-65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex A to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora Supplemented Technical Primer”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C1-66 through C1-90, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Third Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 25, 2021, pp. C1-112 through C1-119 , Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Second Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. C1-94 through C1-111, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-1 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-2 through C2-46, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-3 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-51 through C2-62, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-2 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-47 through C2-50, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-4 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-63 through C2-70, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-5 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-71 through C2-75, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-6 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-76 through C2-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-8 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-88 through C2-96, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-7 to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. C2-83 through C2-87, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AA-9 to the Second Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. C2-97 through C2-122, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D1-73 through D1-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D1-2 through D1-51, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-1 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-2 through D2-5, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-2 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-6 through D2-53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-4 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-80 through D2-92, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-3 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-54 through D2-79, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-5 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-93 through D2-108, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-6 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-109 through D2-110, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-8 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-113 through D2-114, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-9 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-115 through D2-116, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-10 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-117 through D2-118, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-12 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-121 through D2-122, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-11 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-119 through D2-120, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-15 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-142 through D2-153, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-16 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-154 through D2-160, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-18 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-171 through D2-175, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-17 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-161 through D2-170, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-19 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-176 through D2-179, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-21 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-190 through D2-200, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-20 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-180 through D2-189, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-23 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-207 through D2-235, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-22 to the Third Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Nov. 22, 2021, pp. D2-201 through D2-206, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 1”, Dec. 7, 2021, pp. T/2 through T/48, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 2”, Dec. 8, 2021, pp. T/54 through T/99, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 3”, Dec. 9, 2021, pp. T/109 through T/162, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Proceedings Day 4”, Dec. 14, 2021, pp. 1 through 53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA1, including Butterweck et al., “Finite wordlength effects in digital filters: a review”, Jan. 1, 1988, EUT report. E, Fac. of Electrical Engineering; vol. 88-E-205, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands, pp. XX-AA/2 through XX-AA/99, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA2, including Acampora, “An Introduction to Broadband Networks, LANs, Mans, ATM, B-ISDN, and Optical Networks for Integrated Multimedia Telecommunications”, (c) 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York, pp. XX-AA/100 through XX-AA/108, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA4, including Gregson, “LCG Gains Patent on LGCell Antenna” RCR Wireless News, Apr. 13, 1998, p. XX-AA/126, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA5, Dagoni, “The lobbyist, the US Representative, and the Israeli Company”, Globes, Oct. 20, 2005, pp. XX-AA/127 through XX-AA/130, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA7, WDD, “Designing Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Considerations, challenges, and what to expect when designing and deploying DAS.”, (c) 2016, Advantage Business Media, pp. XX-AA/139 through XX-AA/153, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA9, OFCOM, “Citizens' Band (CB) radio spectrum use—information and operation”, Mar. 2018, pp. XX-AA/173 through XX-AA/181, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA10, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Dallas Division, “Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Anthony Acampora”, pp. XX-AA/182 through XX-AA/572, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA11, Dukda, “Introduction to Structured Cabling”, Division of Information Technology, Ministry of Communication, Sep. 2000, pp. XX-AA/573 through XX-AA/600, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP (UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA12, cleeCOMcen, “History of CV Radio”, downloaded Dec. 1, 2021 from www.cleecomcen.co.uk/history-of-cb-radio/, pp. XX-AA/601 through XX-AA/605, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA13, Ghayas, “What Frequency Was Used by IS-95 (CdmaONE)?”, downloaded Apr. 12, 2021 from https://commsbrief.com/what-frequency-was-used-by-cdmaone/, pp. XX-AA/606 through XX-AA/612, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA14, Wireless Networks Online, “LGCell(TM) Wireless Network System”, downloaded Nov. 19, 2021 from https://www.wirelessnetworksonline.com/doc/lgcell-wireless-network-system-0004, p. XX-AA/613, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA16, “4×200 KHz Sub Chanels”, p. XX-AA/615, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-1, “Oh Forward Path”, p. XX-AJS/2, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-2, Al-Rawshidy et al., “Radio over Fiber Technologies for Mobile Communication Networks”, May 9, 2002, (c) 2002 Artech House, Inc. pp. XX-AJS/3 through XX-AJS/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Grounds of Invalidity”, Aug. 26, 2020, pp. B1/23 through B1/27, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Reply and Defence to Counterclaim”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/28 through B1/31, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Statement of Case on Invalidity” Aug. 20, 2021, pp. B1/33 through B1/46, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Claimant's Notice of discontinuance” Sep. 22, 2021, pp. B1/47, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Defendant's Notice of discontinuance”, Sep. 24, 2021, pp. B1/48, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of Birss J” Oct. 29, 2020, pp. B1/49 through B1/53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Confidentiality Order (by Consent) by Smith J”, Jun. 6, 2021, pp. B1/54 through B1/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of Meade J”, Jul. 23, 2021, Page(s) B1/61 through B1/65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Consent Order of HHJ Hacon”, Sep. 21, 2021, pp. B1/66 through B1/67, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Order of HHJ Hacon”, Sep. 28, 2021, pp. B1/68 through B1/70, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Technical Primer”, Jul. 16, 2021, pp. B1/71 through B1/83, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Order of Mellor J”, Nov. 23, 2021, pp. B1/84 through B1/90, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Claim Annex C”, pp. B3/2 through B3/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 1”, pp. B3/13 through B3/30, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 2”, pp. B3/31 through B3/34, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Particulars of Infringement Annex 3”, pp. B3/35 through B3/47, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227, pp. A3-36 through A3-43, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR2001-0048227, pp. A3-44 through A3-53, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR10-2001-0018675, pp. A3-54 through A3-65, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR10-2001-0018675, pp. A3-66 through A3-82, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Korean Patent Application Publication KR1999-0064537, pp. B2/2 through B2/12, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Certified Translation of Korean Patent Application Publication KR1999-0064537, pp. B2/13 through B2/24, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Claimant for Cross Examination—XX-AJS-3, including European Patent EP 1 334 630 B1, Sep. 22, 2004, pp. XX-AJS/62 through XX-AJS/75, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Exhibit AJS-7 to the First Expert Report of Professor Alwyn John Seeds”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. D2-111 through D2-112, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA6, including annotated U.S. Pat. No. 7,848,747 B2, Dec. 7, 2010, pp. XX-AA/131 through XX-AA/138, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, Documents Provided by the Defendant for Cross Examination—XX-AA8, including U.S. Pat. No. 9,332,402 B2, May 3, 2016, pp. XX-AA/154 through XX-AA/172, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Neutral Citation No. [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat), Case No. HP-2020-000017, Apr. 1, 2022, “Comptroller Comments re: EP(UK) 1 570 626 B1”, from EP Application No. 03790242.6 from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A3/106 through A3/109, Published: GB. |
Hoberecht, “A Layered Network Protocol for Packet Voice and Data Integration”, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas In Communications, vol. SAC-1, No. 6, Dec. 1983, pp. Cover through 1013. |
Horowitz, “Digital Electronics”, “Chapter 8: Basic Logic Concepts”, “The Art of Electronics”, 1980, p. 316, Publisher: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 24, 2006, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3)—Reissued” from EP Application No. 10011450.3, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jan. 26, 2016, pp. 1 through 37, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 3, 2011, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) for EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 14, 2013, pp. 1-27. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) from EP Application No. 10011450.3 dated Aug. 11, 2015”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Aug. 11, 2015, pp. 1-40, Published: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3)”, from EP Application No. 10011450.3, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, Jul. 14, 2015, pp. 1 through 39, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “European Office Action for Application Serial No. 10011450.3”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 16, 2015, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EP Application No. 10011450.3”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 14, 2011, pp. 1-9, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, from EP Application No. 15020262.0, from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, May 16, 2020, pp. 1 through 8, Published: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action for EP Application No. 03790242.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings from EP Application No. 01950794.6”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, filed May 21, 2010, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
Federal Patent Court, “Replica to the invalidity matter 6Ni21/19 against EP 2290850 dated Dec. 20, 2019”, pp. 1 through 53, Published: DE. |
Federal Patent Court, “Statement of Reply including Annex MB1 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1570626 mailed Jul. 31, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, pp. 1-57, Published: DE. |
Federal Patent Court, “Statement of Reply including Annexes MB1 and MB2 in the Nullity Action from EP Application No. 2290850 mailed Sep. 13, 2019”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431, pp. 1-149, Published: DE. |
Foxcom Wireless, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System”, White Paper, 1998, Document No. 42-14-001-09C, pp. 1 through 8. |
Foxcom Wireless, Application Note, “RFiber(TM)—RF Fiberoptic Links for Wireless Applications”, 1998, Document No. 41-14-001-10E, pp. 3 through 11. |
German Federal Patent Court, “SOLid Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1570626”, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743, May 11, 2021, pp. 1-114, Published: DE. |
German Federal Patent Court, “Anlage NK 3 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-2, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431. |
German Federal Patent Court, “Anlage NK 4 in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-2, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431. |
German Federal Patent Court, “Grounds of Objection to SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Nov. 12, 2021, pp. 1-104, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431. |
German Federal Patent Court, “SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Mar. 3, 2021, pp. 1-108, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431. |
German Federal Patent Court, “SOLiD Inc.'s Reply in the Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 2 290 850 (DE 601 49 927)”, Feb. 11, 2022, pp. 1-41, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431. |
German Federal Patent Court, “Grounds for Objection to SOLiD Inc.'s Nullity Action from EP Patent No. 1 570 626 (DE 603 45 256)”, Sep. 14, 2021, pp. 1 through 112, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431. |
Grace, “Synchronous Quantized Subcarrier Multiplexing for Transport of Video, Voice and Data”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Sep. 1990, vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1351-1358. |
Graf, “Modern Dictionary of Electronics—Seventh Edition”, 1999, pp. 1 through 9. |
Grundmann et al., “An Empirical Comparison of a Distributed Antenna Microcell System Versus a Single Antenna Microcell System for Indoor Spread Spectrum Communications at 1.8 Ghz”, “ICUPC '93”, 1993, pp. 59 through 63. |
GTE Laboratories, “Urban Microcell System Layout”, GTE Laboratories Conference, Jun. 14-18, 1992, pp. 1-13. |
Gupta et al., “Land Mobile Radio Systems—A Tutorial Exposition”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jun. 1985, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 34-45. |
Haas et al., “A Mode-Filtering Scheme for Improvement of the Bandwidth-Distance Product in Multimode Fiber Systems”, Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, No. 7, Jul. 1993, pp. 1125 through 1131. |
Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, Jun. 1991, pp. 1171 through 1175. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Indexes”, pp. 1 through 14, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Approved Judgment”, Apr. 1, 2021, pp. 1 through 64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. A2/49 through A2/52, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Statement of Reasons for Amendment of EP (UK) 2290850 B1”, pp. A2/53 through A2/60, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Notice and Statement of Grounds of Opposition”, Oct. 12, 2021, pp. A2/61 through A2/64, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Comptroller Comments”, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A2/65 through A2/68, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, Sep. 1, 2021, pp. A3-83 through A3-86, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Statement of Reasons for Amendment of EP(UK) 1,570,626 B1”, pp. A3-87 through A3-92, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Annex D to the First Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Oct. 22, 2021, pp. A3-93 through A3-105, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Application Notice”, pp. A3/110 through A3/112, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Comptroller Comments re: EP(UK) 1 570 626 B1”, Oct. 26, 2021, pp. A3/106 through A3/109, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Fourth Expert Report of Dr Anthony Acampora”, Dec. 1, 2021, pp. A3-113 through A3-116, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Claim Form by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, pp. B1/2 through B1/3, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Intellectual Property List (ChD) Patent Court, Case No. HP-2020-000017, “Amended Particulars of Claim by Order of Mr Justice Meade dated Jul. 23, 2021”, Aug. 6, 2021, pp. B1/4 through B1/6, Re: EP(UK) 2 290 850 and EP(UK) 1 570 626 issued from Foreign Counterparts to U.S. Appl. Nos. 09/619,431 and 10/395,743. |
ADC Kentrox.COPYRGT. A Subsidiary of ADC Telecommunications, Inc. “And now a few words from your Customers . . . ”, Aug. 1992 (4 pages). |
ADC Kentrox, News Release, “ADC Kentrox Introduces Innovative Wireless Network Access Solution Cellular Subscribers Offered a New Level of Portable Services,” Mar. 1, 1993 (3 pages). |
ADC Kentrox, News Release, “First Field Trial Results Exceeds Expectations,” Mar. 2, 1993 (2 pages). |
ADC Kentrox Wireless Systenr Group CityCell.TM. 824—A Positioning White paper, (Mar. 1993) CITA Trade Show. |
ADC Kentrox Call Report, Oct. 18, 1992, call date Oct. 12, 1992, re: Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. |
Akos et al., Jul. 1999, IEEE Transactions on Communications, 47:983-988, Direct Bandpass Sampling of Multiple Distinct RF Signals. |
Ameritech, “Broadband Optical Transport Digital Microcell Connection Service—Interface and Performance Specifications. A technical descriptionof the User-Network Interface and Performance Specifications,”AM TR-NIS 000117, (pp. 1-26), Issue 1, Dec. 1993. |
Cellular Industry, The Day Group, “New Signal Transport Technology Digitizes the Cellular Band,” 2 pages, (prior to Dec. 22, 2000). |
Cox “A Radio System Proposal for Widespread Low-Power Tetherless Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39(2), Feb. 1991, pp. 324-335. |
Electronic Letters, an International Publication, Nov. 19, 1987, vol. 23 No. 24, pp. 1255-1257. |
1998 Foxcom Wireless Proprietary Information, pp. 1-8, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System.” |
Gupta et al., “Land Mobile Radio Systems—A Tutorial Exposition”, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 23(6), Jun. 1985, p. 37. |
Ishio et al., “A Two-Way Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing Transmission and its Application to a Switched TV Distribution System,” Electrical Communication Laboratories, Nipon Telegrah & Telephone Public Corporation, Yokosuka, Japan and Technical Bureau, Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Public Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, (10 pages) (prior to Dec. 22, 2000). |
Kobb, “Personal Wireless,” Special Report/Communications, IEEE Spectrum, Jun. 1993, pp. 20-25. |
Lee et al., 1993 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 18-20, 1993, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology, PacTel Corporation, published May 18, 1993, “Intelligent Microcell Applications in PCS,” pp. 722-725. |
Merrett et al., 41st IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 19-22, 1991, Gateway to the Future Technology, 91CH2944-7, British Telecom Research Laboratories, “A Cordless Access System Using Radio-Over-Fibre Techniques,” pp. 921-924. |
Miicrowaves & RF, “Digital Transport for Cellular,” Feb. 1993. |
O'Byrne, Vehicular Technology Society 42nd VTS Conference Frontiers of Technology, From Pioneers to the 21st Century, GTE Laboratories Incorporated, “TDMA and CDMA in a Fiber-Optic Environment,” vol. 2 of 2, pp. 727-731 (May 10, 1992). |
Payne et al., “Single Mode Optical Local Networks”, Globecom '85, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Dec. 2-5, 1985, pp. 1201-1205. |
Quinn, “The Cell Enhancer”, Bell Atlanttic Mobile Systems, pp. 77-83. |
Russell, New Microcell Technology Sets Cellular Carriers Free, Telephony, Mar. 1993, pp. 40, 42 and 46. |
R. Steele. Towards a High-Capacity Digital Cellular Mobile Radio System. “Towards a High Capacity Digital Cellular Mobile Radio System,” IEE Proceedings, vol. 132, Pt.F, No. 5, Aug. 1985, pp. 405-415. |
Tang, Fiber Optic Antenna Remoting for Multi-Sector Cellular Cell Sites. GTE Laboratories—Abstract (Conference Jun. 14-18, 1992). |
Titch, “Kentrox boosts coverage and capacity,” Telephony Jan. 25, 1993 (1 page). |
Urban Microcell System Layout. GTE Laboratories (Conference Jun. 14-18, 1992). |
Wala, 1993 43rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, May 18-20, 1993, Personal Communication—Freedom Through Wireless Technology, Waseca Technology Inc., published May 18, 1993, “A New Microcell Freedom Architecture Using Digital Optical Transport,” pp. 585-588. |
“ZoneMaster.TM.—Maximum Coverage for High-Capacity Locations”. Decibel Multi Media MicroCELL System. 4 pages 1993 Decibel Products. 2-83-5M. |
Grace, Martin K., “Synchronous Quantized Subcarrier Multiplexing for Transport of Video, Voice and Data”, “IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications”, Sep. 1990, pp. 1351-1358, vol. 8, No. 7, Publisher: IEEE. |
Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, , pp. 1171-1175, Publisher: IEEE. |
Harvey et al., “Cordless Communications Utilising Radio Over Fibre Techniques for the Local Loop”, “IEEE International Conference on Communications”, Jun. 1991, pp. 1171-1175, Publisher: IEEE. |
China Patent Offfice, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Oct. 24, 2008”, “from Foreign Counterpart of US. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Oct. 24, 2008, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Jul. 8, 2005”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jul. 8, 2005, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed May 11, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 11, 2007, pp. 1-5, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Third Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Oct. 26, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Oct. 26, 2007, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Fourth Office Action from CN Application No. 01815499.9 mailed Mar. 7, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 7, 2007, pp. 1-8, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200710153587. X mailed May 28, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 28, 2013, pp. 1-3, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Feb. 4, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 4, 2013, pp. 1-7, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Mar. 19, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 19, 2010, pp. 1-12, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Decision on Rejection from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Nov. 2, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 2, 2010, pp. 1-9, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Notice of Reexamination from CN Application No. 200710153587.X mailed Jun. 21, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jun. 21, 2012, pp. 1-18, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “Second Office Action from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Jan. 23, 2013”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 23, 2013, pp. 1-11, Published in: CN. |
China Patent Office, “Notification to Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Aug. 19, 2013”, Aug. 19, 2013, pp. 1-6, Published in: CN. |
Chinese Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200910005002.9 mailed Apr. 6, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”,Apr. 6, 2012,pp. 1-12, Publishedin: CN. |
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed May 3, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 3, 2011, pp. 1-45, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 019507946-2411 mailed Feb. 24, 2006”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Feb. 24, 2006, pp. 1-5, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed Mar. 6, 2007”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed Nov. 16, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 16, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings from EPO Application No. 01950794.6-2411 mailed May 21, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, May 21, 2010, pp. 1-6, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report from EPO Application No. 10011450.3-2411 mailed Jan. 14, 2011”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jan. 14, 2011, pp. 1-9, Published in: EP. |
U.S. Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Aug. 12, 2003, pp. 1-9. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 13, 2003, pp. 1-15. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Apr. 25, 2007, pp. 1-19. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Jul. 18, 2007, pp. 1-21. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Oct. 3, 2007, pp. 1-22. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Oct. 14, 2008, pp. 1-25. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Aug. 13, 2009, pp. 1-12. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Aug. 24, 2006, pp. 1-19. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Feb. 5, 2007, pp. 1-16. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Apr. 3, 2008. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 10/740,944”, Feb. 27, 2009, pp. 1-25. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215”, Aug. 2, 2012, pp. 1-11. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 12/617,215”, Apr. 11, 2012, pp. 1-12. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance and Fees Due”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948”, Jul. 3, 2013, pp. 1-10, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “from U.S. Appl. No. 13/662,948”, Apr. 24, 2013, pp. 1-23, Published in: US. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Examination Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Jun. 10, 2002”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Jun. 10, 2002, pp. 1-3, Published in: WO. |
International Searching Authority, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Nov. 15, 2001”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Nov. 15, 2001, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US 01/21021 mailed Mar. 18, 2002”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,431”, Mar. 18, 2002, pp. 1-2, Published in: WO. |
China Patent Office, “Notice of Grant of Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 94192782.2 mailed Sep. 29, 2000”, “from Foreign Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Sep. 29, 2000, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN. |
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action from JP Application No. 6-525837 mailed Oct. 14, 2003”, “from foreign counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 14, 2003, pp. 1-2, Published in: JP. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Jun. 12, 1996, pp. 1-8, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1-4, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Apr. 4, 1995, pp. 1-14, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 26, 1995, pp. 1-8, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Feb. 1-9, 1997, pp. 1-9, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Mar. 10, 1995, pp. 1-13, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-18, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Mar. 12, 2009, pp. 1-10, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,357”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-17, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742”, May 27, 1996, pp. 1-5, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/294,742”, Oct. 26, 1996, pp. 1-4, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/298,652”, May 29, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Aug. 19, 1997, pp. 1-9, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Jul. 17, 1995, pp. 1-5, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Apr. 9, 1996, pp. 1-3, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/299,159”, Oct. 2, 1996, pp. 1-2, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129”, Oct. 17, 1996, pp. 1-6, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 08/410,129”, Jan. 23, 1996, pp. 1-12, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Jun. 22, 2010, pp. 1-16, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Apr. 17, 2009, pp. 1-8, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,362”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-18, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Aug. 8, 2007, pp. 1-8. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Mar. 30, 2004, pp. 1-19. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/747,273”, Oct. 6, 2005, pp. 1-10. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Jun. 23, 2010, pp. 1-21, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Intent to Issue a Reexam Certificate”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Dec. 6, 2010, pp. 1-21, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Order Granting/Denying Request for Ex Parte Reexamination”, “U.S. Appl. No. 09/010,363”, Apr. 17, 2009, pp. 1-10, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,363”, Sep. 25, 2009, pp. 1-32, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Advisory Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Nov. 3, 2011, pp. 1-2. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Final Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Aug. 29, 2011, pp. 1-14. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Notice of Allowance”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Sep. 17, 2012, pp. 1-11. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,255”, Feb. 17, 2011, pp. 1-13. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Office Action”, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866”, Jan. 22, 2014, pp. 1-28, Published in: US. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Restriction Requirement”, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/725,866”, Sep. 10, 2013, pp. 1-8, Published in: US. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897 mailed May 29, 1995”, May 29, 1995, pp. 1-8, Publisher: from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660, Published in: WO. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US94/05897 mailed Oct. 31, 1994”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Oct. 31, 1994, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “Written Opinion from PCT Application No. PCT/US 94/05897 mailed Feb. 14, 1995”, “from PCT Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 08/204,660”, Feb. 14, 1995, pp. 1-7, Published in: WO. |
China Patent Office, “Notification of Grant Patent Right for Invention from CN Application No. 200380109396.3 mailed Jun. 29, 2010”, “from Chinese Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jun. 29, 2010, pp. 1-4, Published in: CN. |
China Patent Office, “First Office Action from CN Application No. 200380109396.3 mailed Jan. 4, 2008”, “from Chinese Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jan. 4, 2008, pp. 1-7, Published in: CN. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed Jul. 24, 2007”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Jul. 24, 2007, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
European Patent Office, “Office Action from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed Feb. 11, 2009”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 11, 2009, pp. 1-4, Published in: EP. |
Korean Patent Office, “Decision to Grant from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Feb. 2, 2012”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 1-7, Published in: KR. |
Korean Patent Office, “Office Action from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Sep. 30, 2010”, “from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Sep. 30, 2010, pp. 1-5, Published in: KR. |
Korean Patent Office, “Final Rejection from KR Application No. 2005-7010190 mailed Oct. 31, 2011”, “from Korean Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Oct. 31, 2011, pp. 1-3, Published in: KR. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302 mailed Dec. 14, 2011”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, Dec. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10, Published in: WO. |
The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US03/38302 mailed May 2, 2005”, “from PCT Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 2, 2005, pp. 1-5, Published in: WO. |
Foxcom Wireless Proprietary Information, “Application Note RFIBER-RF Fiberoptic Links for Wireless Applications”, 1998, pp. 3-11 . |
City Cell, Cellular Industry the Day Group, “ADC Kentrox Citycell Field Trial Yields Another First—Simultaneous Analog and Digital Calls”, prior to Dec. 22, 2000, p. 1. |
Ericksson, “Advertisement by Ericksson”, “Telephony”, 1994, p. 1. |
“ADC Kentrox Introduces Citycell 824, A Replacement for Conventional Cell Sites; Company's Original Goal Was to Improve F”, “Telocator Bulletin”, Feb. 1993, p. 1. |
Foxcom Wireless Preperietary Information, “Litenna In-Building RF Distribution System”, 1998, pp. 1-8. |
Horowitz, Paul, “Digital Electronics”, “The Art of Electronics”, 1980, p. 316, Publisher: Press Syndicte of the University of Cambridge. |
Schneiderman, “Offshore Markets Gain in Size, Competitiveness Even the Smallest Industry Companies Are Expanding Their Global Buisness”, “Microwaves and RF”, Mar. 1993, pp. 33-39, vol. 32, No. 3, Publisher: Penton Publishing, Inc, Published in: Berea, OH. |
Nakatsugawa et al., “Software Radio Base and Personal Stations for Cellular/PCS Systems”, 2000, pp. 617-621, Publisher: IEEE. |
European Patent Office, “Communication Under Rule 71(3) EPC from EPO Application No. 03790242.6-2415 mailed May 14, 2013”, “from European Counterpart of U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,743”, May 15, 2013, pp. 1-27, Published in: EP. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60430434 | Dec 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15436605 | Feb 2017 | US |
Child | 18095889 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10395743 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 15436605 | US | |
Parent | 10395743 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 18095889 | US |