The present invention relates to document processing systems in general, and more particularly to computer-based document processing systems that employ document imaging and optical character recognition.
Document processing employing Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is well known. The OrboCAR line of products, commercially available from Orbograph Ltd., of Yavne, Israel, provides optical character recognition of handwritten and printed document elements, primarily for the banking industry. While the OrboCAR line of products automatically reads the majority of those document elements successfully, the remaining document elements must be manually keyed by clerks. Such manual keying involves high labor costs and management attention.
The present invention seeks to provide a distributed document processing architecture that overcomes disadvantages and limitations of the prior art.
In one aspect of the present invention a method for document processing is provided, the method including a) receiving availability profiles from a plurality of personnel operating a plurality of remote computers, b) receiving a work order from a remote customer's computer, the work order having a time frame within which the work order may be serviced, where any of the availability profiles indicates that any of the personnel are available to service the work order within the time frame c) receiving within the context of the work order an image of a document from the remote customer's computer, d) decomposing the image into a plurality of data entry region sub-images, e) providing any of the plurality of data entry region sub-images to the available personnel at the remote computers, and f) receiving from each of the plurality of remote computers a data entry value associated with at least one of the data entry region sub-images.
In another aspect of the present invention any of the steps are performed at a central computer that is in communication with any of the remote computers.
In another aspect of the present invention the providing step e) includes transmitting each of the data entry region sub-images together with a unique identifier.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes collating—the data entry values into a character-based electronic document corresponding to the image.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes providing the electronic document to the remote customer.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes performing optical character recognition on any of the data entry region sub-images, and the providing step e) includes providing if a score related to a result of the performing optical character recognition is below a predefined threshold.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes performing optical character recognition on any of the data entry region sub-images, thereby resulting in an optical character recognition value, comparing the data entry value associated with the data entry region sub-image to the optical character recognition value, and where the data entry value and the optical character recognition value differ, providing the data entry region sub-image to another one of the available personnel to which the data entry region sub-image was not previously provided.
In another aspect of the present invention the providing step e) includes providing at least one of the plurality of data entry region sub-images to at least two of the available personnel, and where a predetermined number of the data entry values associated with the data entry region sub-images are the same, the collating step includes collating one of the predetermined number of the data entry values.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes providing in the providing step e) at least one of the plurality of data entry region sub-images to a plurality of the available personnel, performing optical character recognition on the data entry region sub-image, thereby resulting in an optical character recognition value, comparing a plurality of the data entry values associated with the data entry region subimage and the optical character recognition value, and collating in the collating step one of the values from among a predetermined number of the values that are the same.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes receiving from any of the plurality of remote computers an indicator associated with at least one of the data entry region sub-images rejecting the associated data entry region sub-image, and providing to the rejecting remote computer an expanded data entry region sub-image that includes the rejected data entry region sub-image.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes rating the performance of any of the data entry clerks, selecting any of the data entry clerks to service the work order whose performance rating equals or exceeds a performance rating specified for the work order.
In another aspect of the present invention the method further includes selecting any of the data entry clerks to service the work order who have been pre-approved by the customer.
In another aspect of the present invention a system for document processing is provided, the system including a plurality of availability profiles for a plurality of personnel operating a plurality of remote computers, a work order received from a remote customer's computer, the work order having a time frame within which the work order may be serviced, means for determining whether any of the availability profiles indicates that any of the personnel are available to service the work order within the time frame, means for receiving within the context of the work order an image of a document from the remote customer's computer, means for decomposing the image into a plurality of data entry region sub-images, means for providing any of the plurality of data entry region sub-images to the available personnel at the remote computers, and means for receiving from each of the plurality of remote computers a data entry value associated with at least one of the data entry region sub-images.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes a central computer that is in communication with any of the remote computers and that is configured with any of the elements mentioned hereinabove.
In another aspect of the present invention the means for providing is operative to transmit each of the data entry region sub-images together with a unique identifier.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes means for collating the data entry values into a character-based electronic document corresponding to the image.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes means for providing the electronic document to the remote customer.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes means for performing optical character recognition on any of the data entry region sub-images, and the means for providing is operative to provide if a score related to a result of the performing optical character recognition is below a predefined threshold.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes means for performing optical character recognition on any of the data entry region sub-images and being operative to provide an optical character recognition value, means for comparing the data entry value associated with the data entry region kb-image to the optical character recognition value, and means for providing the data entry region sub-image to another one of the available personnel to which the data entry region sub-image was not previously provided, operative where the data entry value and the optical character recognition value differ.
In another aspect of the present invention the means for providing is operative to provide at least one of the plurality of data entry region sub-images to at least two of the available personnel, and, where a predetermined number of the data entry values associated with the data entry region sub-images are the same, where the means for collating is operative to collate one of the predetermined number of the data entry values.
In another aspect of the present invention the means for providing is operative to provide at least one of the plurality of data entry region sub-images to a plurality of the available personnel, and the system further includes means for performing optical character recognition on the data entry region sub-image, operative to provide an optical character recognition value, and means for comparing a plurality of the data entry values associated with the data entry region sub-image and the optical character recognition value, and where the means for collating is operative to collate one of the values from among a predetermined number of the values that are the same.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes means for receiving from any of the plurality of remote computers an indicator associated with at least one of the data entry region sub-images rejecting the associated data entry region subimage, and means for providing to the rejecting remote computer an expanded data entry region sub-image that includes the rejected data entry region sub-image.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes a performance rating of any of the data entry clerks, and means for selecting any of the data entry clerks to service the work order whose performance rating equals or exceeds a performance rating specified for the work order.
In another aspect of the present invention the system further includes means for selecting any of the data entry clerks to service the work order who have been pre-approved by the customer.
The disclosures of all patents, patent applications, and other publications mentioned in this specification and of the patents, patent applications, and other publications cited therein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
Similarly, one or more customer computers 106 are configured for communication with computer 102 via communications medium 104 or any other suitable communications medium. Any of computers 106 and/or any of computers 102 may be configured to perform optical character recognition on images of documents that include portions that require optical character recognition, such as, but not limited to, handwritten portions, and may be otherwise configured to perform portions of any of the methods described hereinbelow.
Reference is now made to
Independently, any of customer computers 106 send one or more work orders to computer 102 via communications medium 104 or any other suitable communications medium. Each work order preferably indicates a time frame within which a job may be serviced, as well as some measure of the magnitude of the job, such as the number of documents to be processed computer 102 then identifies those data clerks whose availability profile indicates that the data entry clerk would be available to work on the job within the indicated time frame.
Together with the work order, or separately therefrom, computer 106 sends to computer 102 for processing one or more document images that comprise the job specified by the work order. Computer 102 then decomposes each image into one or more data entry region sub-images using conventional techniques, where each sub-image includes an element that requires interpretation or recognition, now referred to as a recognition element, such as, but not limited to, a handwritten element. Computer 102 then provides each subimage to one or more available data entry clerks at one or more computers 100, typically together with a unique identifier identifying the sub-image. The data entry clerk then views the sub-image, keys in a data entry value from the characters appearing in the recognition element of the sub-image, and transmits the data entry value to computer 102, typically together with the unique identifier where provided. For each document image, computer 102 collates data entry values received from data entry clerks into a character-based electronic document corresponding to the document image. Optionally (optional steps are shown in dashed lines), where a single sub-image is provided to more than one data entry clerk who each provide an associated data entry value, if a predetermined number of these values are the same, the matching result may be selected for collation as indicated above.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
It is appreciated that one or more of the steps of any of the methods described herein may be omitted or carried out in a different order than that shown, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or more specific embodiments, the description is intended to be illustrative of the invention as a whole and is not to be construed as limiting the invention to the embodiments shown. It is appreciated that various modifications may occur to those skilled in the art that, while not specifically shown herein, are nevertheless within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/420,017, entitled DISTRIBUTED DOCUMENT PROCESSING, filed Jan. 30, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,916,498, issued Mar. 13, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/543,596, filed Nov. 17, 2014, entitled DISTRIBUTED DOCUMENT PROCESSING, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,558,417, issued Jan. 31, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/948,167, filed Jul. 22, 2013, entitled DISTRIBUTED DOCUMENT PROCESSING, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,891,873, issued Nov. 18, 2014, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/316,669, filed Dec. 12, 2011, entitled DISTRIBUTED DOCUMENT PROCESSING, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,494,270, issued Jul. 23, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/024,999, filed Feb. 10, 2011, entitled DISTRIBUTED DOCUMENT PROCESSING, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,077,972, issued Dec. 13, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/203,208, filed Aug. 15, 2005, entitled DISTRIBUTED DOCUMENT PROCESSING, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,912,287, issued Mar. 22, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/995,763, filed Nov. 29, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,931,589, issued Aug. 16, 2005, the entire disclosure of each of which above-described applications is herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4264808 | Owens et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4888812 | Dinan et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
5054096 | Beizer | Oct 1991 | A |
5247661 | Hager | Sep 1993 | A |
5444794 | Uhland, Sr. | Aug 1995 | A |
5488671 | Kern | Jan 1996 | A |
5619708 | Ho | Apr 1997 | A |
5668897 | Stolfo | Sep 1997 | A |
5689625 | Austin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5748780 | Stolfo | May 1998 | A |
5761396 | Austin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781711 | Austin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5805747 | Bradford | Sep 1998 | A |
5889896 | Meshinsky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893128 | Nauckhoff | Apr 1999 | A |
5920846 | Storch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5963966 | Mitchell | Oct 1999 | A |
6295387 | Burch | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6742161 | James et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6766069 | Dance et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6931589 | Baltsan et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7181430 | Buchanan et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7289685 | Wolff et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7912287 | Baltsan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8077972 | Baltsan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8494270 | Baltsan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8891873 | Baltsan | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9558417 | Baltsan | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9916498 | Baltsan | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20020044687 | Federman | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030028522 | Collins-Thompson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043397 | Kaltenecker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040097188 | Tanimoto | May 2004 | A1 |
20040181749 | Chellpilla et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050154649 | Jalili | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20130251236 | Murata | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130287284 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130329984 | Kinoshita | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0167292 | Sep 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Indian Office Action for Application No. 4924/DELNP/2012 dated Oct. 26, 2018, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180268211 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15420017 | Jan 2017 | US |
Child | 15919522 | US | |
Parent | 14543596 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15420017 | US | |
Parent | 13948167 | Jul 2013 | US |
Child | 14543596 | US | |
Parent | 13316669 | Dec 2011 | US |
Child | 13948167 | US | |
Parent | 13024999 | Feb 2011 | US |
Child | 13316669 | US | |
Parent | 11203208 | Aug 2005 | US |
Child | 13024999 | US | |
Parent | 09995763 | Nov 2001 | US |
Child | 11203208 | US |