Distributed electronic acceleration sensing for crash severity recognition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6540255
  • Patent Number
    6,540,255
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 20, 2000
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 1, 2003
    22 years ago
Abstract
The crash detection system employs a plurality of electronic acceleration sensors distributed at different locations of a vehicle body. The plurality of electronic acceleration sensors measures changes in acceleration of the vehicle body at different locations and therefore the rate of deformation of the vehicle body. The signals from the plurality of electronic acceleration sensors are filtered, amplified, and passed to an evaluation unit, which reads and compares the signals. Based on the rate of deformation of the vehicle body, the evaluation unit then makes a determination of the severity of the vehicle crash and communicates this information to a passenger safety system.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a system and method for detecting the severity of a crash of a vehicle.




Vehicles employ passenger safety systems such as air bags and passenger restraints that deploy when a vehicle crash is detected by a crash detection system. Typically, a crash detection system consists of an evaluation unit placed inside the vehicle. The evaluation unit has an electronic acceleration sensor, which detects changes in vehicle velocity from within the unit. The signal from this sensor is filtered and then amplified before processing by a controller. The controller then determines when to activate the vehicle's air bag and passenger restraint systems. When a significant change is detected, the evaluation unit instructs the passenger safety system to deploy.




Currently, the electronic acceleration sensor is located with the evaluation unit in the console of the vehicle between the driver and passenger. However, this evaluation unit detects changes in the velocity of the vehicle only from a single location of the vehicle body. In a high-speed collision in contrast to a low-speed collision, the vehicle body will deform. Accordingly, the velocity of the vehicle body will vary across the area of the deformation. Current crash detection systems do not detect this difference in velocity and consequently do not measure the rate of vehicle body deformation, which indicates the degree of severity of a vehicle crash.




Air bag and restraint systems have been developed that deploy to varying degrees to accommodate the varying degrees of intensity of vehicle accidents. For example, air bags that inflate to a higher level in a high-speed collision than in a low-speed collision are known. Passenger restraints may also adjust the level of restraining force based on the accident's intensity. A need therefore exists to determine more precisely the intensity of a vehicle collision.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In a disclosed embodiment of this invention, a plurality of electronic acceleration sensors is distributed at different locations of a vehicle body. The plural electronic acceleration sensors measure the change in acceleration of the vehicle body across the area of distribution. Signals from the plurality of electronic acceleration sensors are filtered, amplified, and passed to an evaluation unit, which reads and compares the signals. Based on the rate of deformation of the vehicle body, the evaluation unit then makes a determination of the severity of the vehicle crash and communicates this information to a passenger safety system.




The present invention accordingly measures the severity of a vehicle crash, communicating precise information about the accident to the passenger safety system. Moreover, the use of multiple electronic acceleration sensors creates crash detection system redundancy in event of electronic acceleration sensor failure.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:





FIG. 1

shows a crash detection system as known in the prior art consisting of an evaluation unit, including an acceleration sensor, placed at a central location of a vehicle body in collision with a barrier.





FIG. 2

shows an embodiment of the present invention, including an evaluation unit and a plurality of acceleration sensors distributed through the vehicle body of FIG.


1


.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




In a vehicle collision, a difference in velocity between points of a vehicle body reflects vehicle deformation. Measuring the rate by which the vehicle body deforms provides an indication of the severity of a crash. In a high-speed collision, the rate of deformation is high. In a low-speed collision, the rate is low or zero.




Current crash detection systems do not measure this rate.

FIG. 1

shows a crash detection system as known in the prior art. The crash detection system includes evaluation unit


2


with an electronic acceleration sensor


6


A, which detects the rate of change in velocity of vehicle body


4


at the location of evaluation unit


2


. The rate of change is measured along the normal path of vehicle body


4


, the x-axis, and may be measured along the y-axis to detect side-impact. Filter


8


and amplifier


10


further processes the signal prior to input into a controller


12


, also contained within evaluation unit


2


. Controller


12


processes the signal and passes the signal to a communication unit


14


, which then transmits the signal to passenger safety system


16


to deploy at a predetermined condition. Passenger safety system


16


is of a known type that is able to provide varying restraining force. The details of system


16


may be as known. The present invention simply provides more accurate feedback of the desired (necessary) restraining force.




The crash detection system as known in the prior art, however, provides limited information about the severity of a collision, apprising passenger safety system


16


only to deploy. The crash detection system does not provide information to passenger safety system


16


as to the level of deployment required to respond more optimally to a crash.





FIG. 2

illustrates an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in

FIG. 2

, a plurality of electronic acceleration sensors


6


A,


6


B,


6


C and


6


D are distributed at various points of vehicle body


4


. In this embodiment, electronic acceleration sensors


6


A,


6


B,


6


C and


6


D are distributed at the front of vehicle body


4


as well as centrally. The rate of change is measured along the normal path of vehicle body


4


, the x-axis, and may be measured along the y-axis to detect side-impact. Filter


8


and amplifier


10


process the signals from electronic acceleration sensors


6


A,


6


B,


6


C and


6


D. Evaluation unit


2


reads and compares the values from electronic acceleration sensors oriented in the same direction, such as


6


A and


6


C, to measure the deformation rate of vehicle body


4


along an axis, either x-axis, y-axis, or any angle between x-axis and y-axis. Through communication unit


14


, evaluation unit


2


communicates with passenger safety system


16


. Based upon this measure, evaluation unit


2


processes the signal and communicates precise information about the severity of the vehicle crash to passenger safety system


14


.




More specifically, in a front-end collision, electronic acceleration sensor


6


A is located in the console between the driver and passenger while electronic acceleration sensor


6


C is located toward the front of vehicle body


4


. Electronic acceleration sensors


6


A and


6


C are preferably aligned to make measurements of acceleration along the x-axis to detect a front-end collision. Upon collision, the values from electronic acceleration sensors


6


A and


6


C are filtered, amplified and passed to evaluation unit


2


.




After converting the acceleration values to velocity, evaluation unit


2


examines the difference in the velocities as measured by electronic acceleration sensors


6


A and


6


C to arrive at a velocity of the passenger cab relative to the front of the vehicle.








V




passenger cab




=V




6A




−V




6C








The velocity of the passenger cab is then multiplied by a force constant to arrive at an estimate of the restraining force needed by the passenger in the collision.






Restraining Force=


f


(


V




passenger cab


)






The greater the difference between velocities measured by electronic acceleration sensors


6


A and


6


C the greater restraining force is required. Evaluation unit


2


then transmits this information via communication unit


14


to passenger safety system


16


. In this manner, evaluation unit


2


provides information to passenger safety system


16


about the degree of intensity of the collision. A side-impact collision is detected in the same manner with electronic acceleration sensors


6


B and


6


D oriented relative to vehicle body


4


to take measurements of acceleration preferably along the y-axis. Other forms of the present invention can make detections of vehicle deformation and therefore crash severity in any direction by placing electronic acceleration sensors


6


at different locations of vehicle body


4


and aligning any two sensors


6


in any desired direction.




The aforementioned description is exemplary rather then limiting. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The preferred embodiments of this invention have been disclosed. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. Hence, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For this reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.



Claims
  • 1. A crash detection system comprising:a plurality of sensors located at different points of a vehicle, at least two of said plurality of sensors making measurements relating to velocity at a first point and at a second point in a forward direction of travel and at least two of said plurality of sensors making measurements relating to velocity along a direction of travel transverse to forward travel at a third point and at a fourth point; and an evaluation unit for reading and comparing the measurements of said plurality of sensors to determine a severity of a vehicle crash by examining a difference in the measurements from said plurality of sensors wherein the difference comprises a comparison of a first rate of movement of the first point of the vehicle compared with a second rate of movement of the second point of the vehicle along the forward direction and a comparison of a third rate of movement of the third point of the vehicle with a fourth rate of movement of the fourth point of the vehicle along the direction transverse to the forward direction.
  • 2. The crash detection system of claim 1, including a communication unit for transmitting a signal generated by said evaluation unit to a passenger safety system.
  • 3. A crash detection system of claim 2, wherein said passenger safety system is operable to provide varying levels of restraining force in response to varying degrees of crash severity.
  • 4. A crash detection system of claim 1, wherein at least two of said plurality of sensors take measurements along a direction of forward travel.
  • 5. A crash detection system of claim 1, wherein at least two of said plurality of sensors take measurements along a direction of travel transverse to forward travel.
  • 6. A crash detection system of claim 1, wherein said evaluation unit determines the difference of between the measurements to determine a severity of a crash and the comparison comprises a subtraction of the first rate of movement of the first point of the vehicle from the second rate of movement of the second point of the vehicle along the same direction.
  • 7. A crash detection system of claim 1, wherein said sensors are acceleration sensors.
  • 8. A method for detecting the severity of a vehicle crash comprising:providing a network of acceleration sensors at different points of a vehicle; reading a first measurement relating to velocity at a first point and a second measurement relating to velocity at a second point from the acceleration sensors; reading a third measurement relating to velocity at a third point and a fourth measurement relating to velocity at a fourth point; comparing the first measurement and the second measurement generated by the acceleration sensors; comparing the third measurement and the fourth measurement generated by the acceleration sensors; and determining a severity of a vehicle crash based on a difference in measurements between the first measurement and the second measurement and between the third measurement and the fourth measurement.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, including the step of signaling a passenger safety system to deploy to a degree based on the difference in measurements generated by the acceleration sensors.
Parent Case Info

This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/160,658, filed Oct. 21, 1999.

US Referenced Citations (30)
Number Name Date Kind
4166641 Okada et al. Sep 1979 A
4243248 Scholtz et al. Jan 1981 A
4620721 Scholtz et al. Nov 1986 A
4836024 Woehrl et al. Jun 1989 A
5357141 Nitschke et al. Oct 1994 A
5363303 Kaneko et al. Nov 1994 A
5416360 Huber et al. May 1995 A
5544919 Tinkler Aug 1996 A
5620203 Jeenicke et al. Apr 1997 A
5712784 Fendt et al. Jan 1998 A
5737224 Jeenicke et al. Apr 1998 A
5746444 Foo et al. May 1998 A
5788273 Jeenicke et al. Aug 1998 A
5916289 Fayyad et al. Jun 1999 A
5967548 Kozyreff Oct 1999 A
5977653 Schmid et al. Nov 1999 A
6005479 Ide Dec 1999 A
6081044 Anthofer et al. Jun 2000 A
6099031 Bischoff Aug 2000 A
6123357 Hosoda et al. Sep 2000 A
6167335 Ide et al. Dec 2000 A
6186539 Foo et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209908 Zumpano Apr 2001 B1
6216070 Hayashi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6236922 Andres May 2001 B1
6256563 Blank et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256564 Miyaguchi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274948 Blank et al. Aug 2001 B1
6327527 Imai et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330500 Moriyama et al. Dec 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
19719454 Jan 1999 DE
19740019 Mar 1999 DE
0982199 Mar 2000 EP
9851544 Nov 1998 WO
WO9912773 Mar 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
International Search Report, date of mailing Oct. 17, 2001.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/160658 Oct 1999 US