Disclosed embodiments relate to distributed feedback lasers with step-index planar (slab) waveguides.
A distributed feedback (DFB) laser is a type of laser diode, quantum cascade laser or optical fiber laser where the active region of the device is periodically structured as a diffraction grating. The diffraction grating acts as the wavelength selective element for at least one of the minors and provides the feedback, reflecting light back into the cavity to form the resonator. In the case of a semiconductor diode laser the diffraction grating includes a grating layer having a periodic refractive index which is different from the refractive index of the adjacent layers. One type of DFB laser has a step-index planar (slab) waveguide.
The DFB laser operates in a single mode emitting laser light of a stable single wavelength and thus is widely used as the light source in optical communication systems. The emission wavelength (λDFB) of the DFB laser is determined by the formula λDFB=2neffΛ, wherein Λ is the spatial period of the diffraction grating and neff is the effective refractive index of the waveguide of the laser device. Thus, λDFB can be determined independently of the peak wavelength of the optical gain of the active layer. The DFB laser is categorized into two types including a refractive-index coupling type and a gain-coupling type based on the material of the diffraction grating.
High power C-band (1530 nm to 1565 nm) operating wavelength range DFB laser chips are available with ex-facet powers ˜200 mW, slope efficiency ˜0.2 W/A and optical far field with a 2:1 vertical to horizontal aspect ratio. These devices have relative intensity noise (RIN) values of ˜−155 dB/Hz and native linewidths of ˜500 kHz. While such DFB laser chips are generally useful, performance improvements are needed. Specifically, higher output power with better slope efficiency is needed together with a far field along with an aspect ratio closer to 1:1 to allow better coupling efficiency into circular waveguides such as optical fibers. Also, the RIN and linewidth provided by conventional DFB lasers operated at higher power can result in unacceptably high amplitude and phase noise for some applications.
This Summary is provided to introduce a brief selection of disclosed concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description including the drawings provided. This Summary is not intended to limit the claimed subject matter's scope.
Disclosed embodiments include distributed feedback (DFB) laser chips formed on a substrate having a waveguide structure including a waveguide layer in the n-doped cladding layer that significantly reduces the mode intensity and thus the loss in the p-doped cladding layer and the active layer. A diffraction grating (hereafter a “grating”) is in one of the p-doped and n-doped cladding layers configured to select an operating wavelength for the DFB laser. The waveguide layer is of a first composition that is compositionally different from the compound semiconductor material of the substrate, and generally has an optical thickness of 0.7 to 1.5 of the guided wavelength. The waveguide structure can further include a hetero-waveguide stack including a plurality of alternating compositional layers beyond the waveguide layer each generally having a thickness between one quarter and one half the guided wavelength alternating the compound semiconductor material with a second higher refractive index (nf) composition that defines a periodic composition wavelength.
The DFB laser has mirrors that can include an anti-reflective (AR) minor on a first end of a length of the DFB laser and a highly reflective (HR) minor opposite the AR minor on a second side of the length. The grating in one embodiment can comprise a partially corrugated (PC) grating including a PC grating portion between a first non-corrugated portion and a second non-corrugated portion. The PC grating portion is spaced apart from the HR minor and AR mirror by the first non-corrugated portion and second non-corrugated portion, respectively. The AR mirror generally has a reflectivity of at least 0.5%, with the reflectivity generally being between 0.5% and 5%.
Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, wherein:
Example embodiments are described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to designate similar or equivalent elements. Illustrated ordering of acts or events should not be considered as limiting, as some acts or events may occur in different order and/or concurrently with other acts or events. Furthermore, some illustrated acts or events may not be required to implement a methodology in accordance with this disclosure.
A grating 115 is shown in the p-doped cladding layer 106 and is configured with a feature spacing to select an operating wavelength to provide an essentially single longitudinal lasing mode for DFB laser 100, such as about 1.55 μm in free-space in one particular embodiment. However, the grating 115 may also be in the n-doped cladding layer 107. For example, the grating 115 may generally be placed anywhere in either cladding layer (n-doped cladding layer 107 or p-doped cladding layer 106) in order to provide reasonable manufacturing tolerances, typically in a cladding region where the field intensity is around ⅓rd (e.g., 20% to 45%) of the peak field intensity. As shown in
A waveguide structure 108 in the n-doped cladding layer 107 includes at least a waveguide layer (see waveguide layer 108a in
DFB laser 100 can have a total length (L) defined by the distance between the AR minor 130 and the HR mirror 135 where the device has both its grating 115 and the active layer 110 extending the full distance (L) as shown in
AR mirror 130 and HR minor 135 are internal minors (integrally formed on the DFB laser 100) that can comprise distributed Bragg reflectors that provide a periodic variation in the effective refractive index by including multiple dielectric layers covering the cleaved end crystalline facets of the laser. As shown in
The DFB laser 100 includes a QW active layer structure (active layer) 110 including at least one QW layer overlying the compound semiconductor substrate 105 between the p-doped cladding layer 106 and the n-doped cladding layer 107. As noted above, the p-doped cladding layer 106 and n-doped cladding layer 107 both can comprise the same compound semiconductor material as the substrate 105.
The grating 115 is shown extending over the entire L of the DFB laser 100 so that the distance from the respective inner edges of the grating 115 to HR mirror 135 and AR minor 130 is zero. As known in the art, the grating 115 can be formed by etching a grating pattern using known DFB laser fabrication techniques. DFB laser 100 is shown including electrodes 127 and 128, typically being metals for low resistance contacts, for applying an electrical drive signal across the DFB laser 100.
The example waveguide structure shown in
The hetero-waveguide stack 108b is shown alternating layers of the compound semiconductor material of the substrate 105 (e.g., InP) with a second composition that is compositionally different (and has a higher nf, e.g., InGaAsP) from the compound semiconductor material which defines a composition wavelength. An optical thickness of the composition wavelength is generally from 0.5 to 1.0 of the guided wavelength. For disclosed DFB lasers, the waveguide structure 108 can include both the waveguide layer 108a and the hetero-waveguide stack 108b as shown in
Waveguide layer 108a and hetero-waveguide stack 108b can be seen to offset a large part of the electric field into the n-doped cladding layer 107 which reduces loss as p-doped cladding layer 106 is recognized to be significantly lossier as due to higher optical absorption, it also has a higher electrical resistance. This low loss slab waveguide feature enables a longer disclosed DFB laser and therefore higher output DFB laser chip while still having a low threshold.
The intensity in the lossier p-doped cladding layer 106 is shown in
The waveguide structure 108 and other layers of disclosed DFB lasers can be created by known epitaxial growth (e.g., Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)) utilizing modified layer compositions so that the refractive index in wave-guiding portions of the n-doped cladding layer 107 being the waveguide layer 108a and the high index layers of the hetero-waveguide stack 108b are higher than their adjacent layers, such as 3.23 for InGaAsP vs. 3.18 InP. The refractive index difference and layer thicknesses can be selected in order to create a waveguide supporting a single fundamental spatial mode. From simulations performed the transverse far field for DFB laser 200 is about 26 degrees. The intensity in the p-doped cladding layer 106 and the active layer 110 has been found to be reduced significantly resulting in 6/cm overall internal loss, of which 3/cm is in the waveguide structure (See
The material compositions of the waveguide layer 108a and hetero-waveguide stack 108b are realizable for thick layer epitaxial growth with good composition control. For example, for InP-based laser devices, this may be reactor dependent, since for example using small fractions of As in a reactor growing InP based materials may be challenging to make a material with a bandgap close to InP lattice matched InGaAsP material with a growth process where small fractions of Ga and As are added to slightly change the bandgap and refractive.
As shown in
PC-DFB laser 300 in contrast uses an AR minor 130 reflectivity of at least 0.5% (generally between 0.5% and 5%), which has been found when used in a disclosed PC-DFB laser design allows the entire device to act as one laser with good stability, low noise performance and high yield. Disclosed DFB lasers thus generally do not use a conventional essentially perfect (e.g., <0.1% reflectivity) AR mirror 130, which has been found to help ensure that the phase noise and RIN of the DFB laser remains low.
There is a significant synergy discovered between disclosed DFB lasers having slab waveguides and PC gratings when the AR minor 130 reflectivity is least 0.5% (as noted above generally being between 0.5% and 5%), which has been found to enable disclosed DFB laser performance to combine performance features from both DFB lasers and MOPAs in a single device. The slab waveguide DFB laser design as described above provides a low loss laser cavity, thus making long devices possible without significant degradation of the output slope efficiency (W/A). When disclosed DFB laser devices are long a high operating current can be utilized since that current is divided over a long laser device length, so that high current is recognized to be possible without having an excessive current density in the device. Adding a disclosed PC grating with an AR mirror 130 reflectivity of least 0.5% provides a DFB section and gain sections in combination the with slab waveguide provides MOPA-like output power capability, with the efficiency, low RIN and low linewidth of lower power DFB lasers.
Disclosed embodiments are further illustrated by the following specific Examples, which should not be construed as limiting the scope or content of this Disclosure in any way.
Regarding PC grating embodiments, such as PC-DFB laser 300 shown in
It is thus found to be beneficial to use a PC grating portion 115a in the laser that is separated both from the HR mirror 135 and the AR minor 130. The separation from the HR minor 135 in some embodiments is greater than 100 μm (a FP length) that is less than 400 μm shown in
Those skilled in the art to which this disclosure relates will appreciate that many other embodiments and variations of embodiments are possible within the scope of the claimed invention, and further additions, deletions, substitutions and modifications may be made to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of this disclosure.
This application and the subject matter disclosed herein claims the benefit of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/863,736 entitled “HIGH POWER DISTRIBUTED FEEDBACK (DFB) LASER” filed Aug. 8, 2013, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6577660 | Muroya | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6987285 | Nagashima et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7542503 | Anselm | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8311071 | Kato | Nov 2012 | B2 |
20030108076 | Yoon et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20070195849 | Takagi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150043607 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61863736 | Aug 2013 | US |