In current implementations, logical routers that are designated as local multicast routers process and replicate multicast data messages at edge nodes that serve as gateways between a logical network and external networks. In such embodiments, multicast data messages originating in the logical network are sent to the edge nodes which then replicate the packets back into the logical network. This process creates unnecessary traffic load on the system. There is therefore a need for a system that can process multicast data messages that originate and terminate in a logical network to be processed in a distributed fashion.
For a managed network implementing at least one logical router having centralized and distributed components, some embodiments provide a method for configuring a set of MFEs to implement a distributed multicast logical router and multiple logical switches to process the multicast data messages. The method sends, from a managed forwarding element (MFE) implementing the distributed multicast logical router, a multicast group query (e.g., an internet group management protocol (IGMP) query) to a set of data compute nodes (DCNs) (e.g., virtual machines, containers, etc.) that are logically connected to one of several logical switches and that execute on the same host machine as the managed forwarding element. The method receives multicast group reports from a subset of the set of DCNs and at least one of the multicast group reports specifies a multicast group of interest. The method distributes, to a set of MFEs executing on other host machines, a summarized multicast group report specifying a set of multicast groups of interest to the first MFE (i.e., multicast groups that the first MFE participates in). In some embodiments, the summarized multicast group report specifies the multicast groups specified in the multicast group reports received from the subset of DCNs.
In some embodiments, the summarized multicast group report is sent to a central controller or central controller cluster (e.g., a central control plane (CCP)). The central controller receives summarized multicast group reports from multiple MFEs executing on multiple host machines and generates aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information based on the summarized multicast group reports. The central controller cluster generates at least one multicast group report that the MFEs can use to populate output lists for replicating multicast group data messages. The central controller cluster distributes (e.g., through a local controller) the generated multicast group report to the MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router and logical switches. In some embodiments, the generated summarized report is an IGMP report, or set of IGMP reports. In other embodiments, the generated summarized report is a report including information that will allow a host machine to populate an output list (e.g., and mroute list) for a multicast group with remote MFEs or tunnel endpoints executing on remote host machines, such as, for example a virtual extensible local area network (VXLAN) tunnel endpoint (VTEP) to which a multicast data message for the multicast group will be replicated.
In other embodiments, the summarized multicast group report is distributed directly to other MFEs implementing the distributed logical multicast router and to an MFE implementing a local multicast router executing as part of an edge node. In some embodiments, the summarized multicast group reports are sent over a particular logical switch (e.g., a transit logical switch) that is not logically connected to any DCNs but is logically connected to the distributed logical multicast router and the edge multicast router executing as part of an edge node and acting as the local multicast router for the logical network. A local multicast router for a logical network in some embodiments is a particular router at the logical network edge that receives and distributes multicast data messages for the logical network and communicates interest in multicast groups to external routers (e.g., using protocol independent multicast (PIM)).
The MFEs including the first MFE, in some embodiments, use the summarized reports received from other MFEs to populate a multicast routing list for replicating data messages for the multicast groups indicated in the summarized report with an identifier for the source MFE or a tunnel endpoint (e.g., a VTEP) executing on the same host machine as the source MFE. In some embodiments, the multicast routing list also includes an output list indicating the logical switches that have local DCNs that participate in the multicast group. The method receives additional summarized multicast group reports from other host machines as they are sent out and uses them to maintain a current multicast routing list for replicating multicast data messages to the appropriate host machines (or MFEs executing on the host machines).
In some embodiments, the logical switches over which multicast group reports are sent generate logical switch output lists that identify individual DCNs and the distributed router for which a multicast data message for a particular multicast group are replicated. The logical switch in some embodiments includes a snooping function that populates the logical switch output list. In some embodiments, the logical switch output list is populated based on the data received from the multicast group reports or the central controller. It is understood that these methods of populating the output list are not exclusive and that in some embodiments both snooping and the summarized report are used to populate the output list.
In some embodiments, an MFE implementing the distributed multicast logical router acts as a multicast group proxy for the compute nodes executing on the same host machine and responds to multicast group queries sent by an edge multicast router executing as part of an edge node and acting as the local multicast router for the logical network.
In some embodiments, a method is provided for processing multicast data messages at a first managed forwarding element (MFE) executing on a first host machine that implements a distributed multicast logical router and multiple logical switches logically connected to the logical router in conjunction with a set of additional MFEs executing on additional host machines. The method receives a multicast data message for a multicast group from a source data compute node (DCN), operating on the first host machine, that logically connects to a first logical switch of the multiple logical switches. The method replicates the multicast data message to a set of DCNs in the multicast group that also operate on the first host machine. In some embodiments, the set of DCNs includes at least a one DCN logically connected to the first logical switch and, in some embodiments, another DCN logically connected to a second logical switch.
In some embodiments, the method replicates to the set of DCNs operating on the first machine by first replicating to DCNs logically connected to the first logical switch and to a logical router connected to the first logical switch. The method then logically replicates, in some embodiments, the multicast data message to other logical switches that have DCNs operating on the first host machine that have reported participating in the multicast group, for the other logical switches to replicate to those DCNs.
The method also replicates the multicast data message to other MFEs in the set of MFEs that have reported participating in the multicast group. In some embodiments, the method replicates the multicast data message to the other MFEs using an identifier of the first logical switch. In some embodiments, the other MFEs replicate to local DCNs by replicating the multicast data message to a set of DCNs logically connected to the first logical switch. In some embodiments, the other MFEs also logically replicate the data message to the logical router. The logical router in some embodiments then logically replicates the multicast data message to the logical switches that are logically connected to DCNs that have reported as participating in the multicast group, for the logical switch to replicate to those DCNs.
The method also replicates the multicast data message from the first MFE to an MFE executing on a host machine that acts as an edge node of a logical network to connect the logical network to external networks. In some embodiments, a logical router component (e.g., service router) executing on the host machine acting as an edge node also acts as a multicast router and communicates with at least one external router to report participation in multicast groups (e.g., using protocol independent multicast (PIM) messages), send multicast messages sourced within the logical network to the external router(s), and receive multicast messages from the external routers. In some embodiments, a received multicast message is forwarded to MFEs that have reported interest in the multicast group of the received multicast message based on the summarized reports of the other MEs implementing the logical network.
The preceding Summary is intended to serve as a brief introduction to some embodiments of the invention. It is not meant to be an introduction or overview of all inventive subject matter disclosed in this document. The Detailed Description that follows and the Drawings that are referred to in the Detailed Description will further describe the embodiments described in the Summary as well as other embodiments. Accordingly, to understand all the embodiments described by this document, a full review of the Summary, Detailed Description and the Drawings is needed. Moreover, the claimed subject matters are not to be limited by the illustrative details in the Summary, Detailed Description and the Drawings, but rather are to be defined by the appended claims, because the claimed subject matters can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the subject matters.
The novel features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, for purposes of explanation, several embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following figures.
In the following description, numerous details are set forth for the purpose of explanation. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the invention may be practiced without the use of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order not to obscure the description of the invention with unnecessary detail.
For a managed network implementing at least one logical router having centralized and distributed components, some embodiments provide a method for processing multicast data messages at a first managed forwarding element (MFE) executing on a first host machine. The MFE implements a distributed multicast logical router and multiple logical switches logically connected to the logical router in conjunction with a set of additional MFEs executing on additional host machines.
Configuration view 100 represents a logical network as designed by a user. As shown, the logical router 101 is part of a logical network 100 that includes the logical router 101 and two logical switches 102A and 102B. The two logical switches 102A and 102B each have VMs that connect to logical ports. While shown as VMs in these figures, it should be understood that other types of data compute nodes (e.g., containers, etc.) may connect to logical switches in some embodiments. The logical router 101 also includes two ports that connect to the external physical network 120. While shown with only one logical router, two logical switches, and five DCNs (VMs) in the logical network, the logical network may include any number of logical routers, switches, and DCNs. In some embodiments, logical router 101 may also be configured by a user to provide network services (e.g., load balancing, network address translation, etc.).
Logical routers (LRs) can be implemented in either a distributed manner (e.g., with the logical router processing performed in first-hop MFEs that physically couple directly to the data compute nodes) or a centralized manner (with the logical router processing performed in gateways for both north-south and east-west traffic). For centralized implementations, logical routers may be scaled out by using multiple physical boxes in order to provide additional throughput (e.g., using equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) techniques) as well as for failure protection.
In some embodiments, the logical routers may only use stateful services if implemented at least partially in a centralized (e.g., clustered) manner (to avoid the need for state-sharing between the logical router implementations). In different embodiments, these gateways (that provide centralized aspects of logical routers, as well as which form the connection to the external network for distributed LRs) may be implemented as virtual machines (sometimes referred to as Edge VMs), in other types of data compute nodes (e.g., containers), or by using the Linux-based datapath development kit (DPDK) packet processing software (e.g., as a VRF in the DPDK-based datapath).
In the management plane view 210 of the logical network, the logical switches 102A and 102B are the same, but the network controller has created two service routers (SRs) 204A and 204B, a distributed router 206 and a transit logical switch 205 for the logical router 101 depicted in user logical view 100. In some embodiments, these SRs operate in active-standby mode, with one of the SRs active and the other operating as a standby (in case of the failure of the active SR). In some embodiments, the management plane generates separate routing information bases (RIB s) for each of the router constructs 204A, 204B, and 206. That is, in addition to having separate objects created in the management/control plane, each of the router constructs 204A, 204B, and 206 is treated as a separate router with separate routes. The transit logical switch 205 then has logical ports for each of these routers, and each of the router constructs has an interface to the transit logical switch.
illustrates the physical distributed implementation of the logical network 100. Each of the VMs that couples to one of the logical switches 102A and 102B in the logical network 100 operates on a host machine 325. The MFEs 330 perform first-hop switching and routing for the logical switches 102A and 102B and for the logical distributed router 206 (in addition to performing switching and/or routing for other logical networks). As shown in
In some embodiments, a method is provided for configuring a set of MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router and multiple logical switches to process the multicast data messages.
As used in this document, the term data packet, packet, or message refers to a collection of bits in a particular format sent across a network. It should be understood that the term data packet, packet, or message may be used herein to refer to various formatted collections of bits that may be sent across a network, such as Ethernet frames, IP packets, TCP segments, UDP datagrams, etc. While the examples below refer to data packets, packets, or messages, it should be understood that the invention should not be limited to any specific format or type of data message. Also, as used in this document, references to L2, L3, L4, and L7 layers (or layer 2, layer 3, layer 4, layer 7) are references respectively to the second data link layer, the third network layer, the fourth transport layer, and the seventh application layer of the OSI (Open System Interconnection) layer model.
The process then receives (at 420) the multicast group reports from the queried DCNs. In some embodiments, each received report specifies at least one multicast group of interest to a DCN. In some embodiments, a DCN sends a separate multicast group report (e.g., an IGMP report) for each multicast group in which the DCN participates. In other embodiments, a multicast group report may specify multiple multicast groups in which the DCN participates, if it participates in more than one group. In some instances, the process will receive reports from only the DCNs that participate in at least one multicast group (i.e., if a DCN does not participate in any multicast groups, it will not send a report). In addition, the multicast group reports in some embodiments include leave reports that specify a multicast group in which a DCN no longer participates.
Next, the process generates (at 430) output lists for logical switches and the distributed multicast logical router based on the multicast group reports received from the local DCNs. An output list is generated for each logical switch having at least one local DCN (i.e., a DCN executing on the same host machine as the MFE implementing the logical switch) that participates (is interested) in a particular multicast group. The output list of a logical switch identifies the DCNs logically connected to the logical switch that should receive multicast data messages belonging to the particular multicast group. In some embodiments, for each logical switch logically connected to DCNs executing on a host machine on which the process is performed, an output list is generated for each multicast group with participating DCNs logically connected to the logical switch. An output list is also generated for the distributed multicast logical router (e.g., an mroute list) that identifies the logical switches that participate in the multicast group. The use of the output lists will be described in further detail in relation to
The process distributes (at 440) a summarized multicast group report to other MFEs executing on other host machines implementing the distributed multicast logical router. In some embodiments, the summarized multicast group report is sent directly to the other MFEs over a logical switch that is not logically connected to DCNs (e.g., a transit logical switch). In these embodiments, the MFEs receiving the summarized report use the information to populate the output list for the distributed multicast logical router to replicate data messages specified in the summarized multicast group report to the source MFE. In other embodiments, the summarized multicast group report is distributed to the other MFEs through a set of central controller computers (e.g., a central control plane (CCP)) that aggregates summarized reports from multiple MFEs. The use of a set of central controller computers to distribute the multicast group data is described in relation to
The process receives (at 450) data regarding the summarized reports sent from other MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router. In some embodiments, the summarized multicast group report is received directly from the other MFEs over a logical switch that is not associated with DCNs (e.g., a transit logical switch). In other embodiments, the data regarding the summarized multicast group reports is received from a set of central controller computers (e.g., a central control plane (CCP)) that aggregates summarized reports from multiple MFEs. The distribution using the set of central controller computers is described in relation to
Based on the received data regarding the summarized reports from the other MFEs, the process generates (at 460) an output list of MFEs that participate in multicast groups. An output list identifies MFEs to which multicast data messages for each multicast group are replicated. The MFEs in some embodiments are identified by a media access control (MAC) address or an internet protocol (IP) address associated with the MFE or a tunnel endpoint executing on the same host machine as the MFE. In some embodiments, the distributed multicast logical router maintains a list for each multicast group in which any DCN in the logical network participates in. In other embodiments, the output list of an MFE includes only those multicast group in which a local DCN (i.e., a DCN executing on the same host machine as the MFE) participates. The process then ends.
The process then generates (at 520) aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information based on the summarized multicast group reports. The aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information in some embodiments includes all the multicast groups that DCNs of the logical network participate in as well as identifying interested MFEs for each multicast group. The aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information in some embodiments identifies one or multiple of (1) the WE, (2) the host machine on which the MFE executes, or (3) a tunnel endpoint (e.g. virtual extensible local area network (VXLAN) tunnel endpoint (VTEP)) executing on the same host machine as the MFE. The identification in some embodiments takes the form of a data link address (e.g., MAC address) or a network layer address (e.g., an internet protocol (IP) address) It is understood that these are merely examples of how an WE or host interested in a particular multicast group are identified and other methods will be apparent to one skilled in the art.
The process generates (at 530) at least one set of data to be used by the individual MFEs to implement the distributed multicast logical router. In some embodiments, an MFE-specific multicast group report is generated for each host machine or WE executing on a host machine that includes the information necessary for the WE to implement the distributed multicast logical router. For example, an WE-specific multicast group report in some embodiments only specifies other MFEs participating in multicast groups included in the summarized report from the specific WE (i.e., multicast groups that have at least one participating DCN that executes on the same host machine as the specific MFE). In other embodiments, the process does not generate MFE-specific multicast group reports, but rather generates a generic multicast group report based on the aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information that allows each MFE to populate its distributed multicast logical router output list for multicast groups that DCNs in the logical network participate in.
The process then distributes (at 540) the multicast group reports generated based on the aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information to the MFEs (e.g., through local controllers executing on the same host machines as the MFEs). As described above, the distributed information in some embodiments is MFE-specific, while in others it is the same for all MFEs. The MFEs can then use the received information to populate their output lists for each multicast group as described above in relation to
Data messages 2 represent multicast group (e.g., IGMP) reports from each DCN in response to the query from the WE. In some embodiments, reports are sent from a particular DCN (e.g., VM1, VM3, and VM4) independent of a query when the DCN joins or leaves a multicast group. Additionally, in some embodiments each arrow for data messages 2 represents a set of multicast group reports. The set of multicast group reports is empty for a DCN that is not participating in any multicast groups. If a DCN participates in multiple multicast groups, in some embodiments, data messages 2 represents multiple multicast group reports, each for a different multicast group that the DCN participates in. In other embodiments, a single multicast group report includes multiple multicast groups that a DCN participates in.
The MFE in some embodiments summarizes the reports received in data messages 2 to create a summarized multicast group report for distribution to the other MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router. Data message 3 represents the MFE 630A sending the summarized multicast group report to the central controller cluster 650.
Other MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router also send similar data messages to determine the multicast groups in which DCNs executing on the same host machine participate. For example, MFE 630B sends a multicast group query as data message 4, receives multicast group reports as data messages 5, creates a summarized multicast group report, and distributes data message 6 to other MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router.
Data message 7 depicts a multicast group message sent from service router 204A (the active service router in the depicted embodiment) to indicate that it is the local multicast router that connects the logical network to the external network. Data message 7 in some embodiments is included in a set of control messages identifying service router 204A as the active service router. In embodiments with multiple active service routers, data message 7 is sent from a single active service router acting as the local multicast router for the logical network. Once the local multicast router is identified, all MFEs are configured to direct all multicast data messages originating on DCNs executing on the same host machine as the MFE to the local multicast router (e.g., service router 204A). In
Data messages 8 are distributed by central controller cluster 650 after multiple summarized reports have been received in, for example, data messages 3 and 6. In some embodiments, central controller cluster 650 sends out, as data messages 8, the multicast group reports it generates based on data messages 3 and 6. In some embodiments, data messages 8 are sent every time a new summarized multicast group report is received from an MFE. In other embodiments, data messages 8 are sent every time a summarized multicast group report is received that changes the aggregated distributed multicast logical router configuration information in a way that requires an update to at least one MFE's output list. As discussed above, data messages 8 may represent different information for each MFE based on the multicast groups specified in the summarized multicast group report received from the MFE. In some embodiments, only a subset of MFEs receive the information as part of data messages 8.
In some embodiments, the local multicast router (e.g., service router 204A) communicates with external routers using protocol independent multicast (PIM) to direct multicast messages from sources external to the network to the local multicast router. The local multicast router uses PIM to indicate participation in at least each multicast group in which any DCN of the logical network participates.
Data messages 3 represents MFE 730A sending the summarized multicast group report to each of the other MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router and to the MFE implementing service router 204A. In some embodiments, each service router receives the summarized multicast group reports in order for it to maintain a current multicast group output list in case the active service router fails. In other embodiments, only the active service router receives the summarized multicast group reports.
Data messages 4 represents MFE 730B sending the multicast group query to DCNs executing on host 725B. data messages 5 represents the multicast group reports sent from the DCNs to the MFE 730B. As for data messages 2, in some embodiments, each of data messages 5 represents a set of multicast group reports. The set of multicast group reports is empty for a DCN that is not participating in any multicast groups. If a DCN participates in multiple multicast groups, in some embodiments, data messages 5 represent multiple multicast group reports, each for a different multicast group in which the DCN participates. In other embodiments, a single multicast group report includes multiple multicast groups in which a DCN participates.
Data messages 6 depict MFE 730B sending its summarized multicast group report to the other MFEs implementing the distributed multicast logical router and to the MFE implementing service router 204A.
Data message 7 depicts service router 204A acting as a local multicast router for the logical network and sending multicast group queries to the DCNs in the logical network. Multicast group queries are also sent to the DCNs executing on other host machines, but are not depicted for clarity. Data message 8 depicts MFE 730A acting as a multicast proxy for the DCNs and responding to the multicast group query sent from service router 204A. In some embodiments, data message 8 represents a set of multicast group reports similar to those of data messages 2 but include all the multicast group identifiers in all of the messages received from DCNs as part of data messages 2.
Some embodiments provide a method for processing multicast data messages at a first managed forwarding element (MFE) executing on a first host machine that implements a distributed multicast logical router. The method is conceptually illustrated in
Process 800 begins by receiving (at 810) a multicast data message from a DCN operating on a particular host machine. This corresponds to data message 1 in
After receiving the multicast data message, the process replicates (at 820) the multicast data message to local DCNs logically connected to the logical switch to which the source DCN logically connects. In
The process then replicates (at 830) the multicast data message to the distributed multicast logical router logically connected to the logical switch. In some embodiments, a single MFE module or program executes both the logical switch and distributed multicast logical router implementations and so the replication is a logical process within the MFE. In terms of configuration view 900, the process (at 830) logically replicates the multicast data message from logical switch 902A to the logical router 901 of which the distributed multicast logical router is a component.
The process then logically replicates (at 840) the multicast data message to other logical switches that are logically connected to local DCNs that participate in the multicast group of the multicast data message. In
After logically replicating the multicast data message to the logical switches, the logical switches replicate (at 840) the multicast data messages to the local DCNs that (1) logically connect to the logical switch and (2) participate in the multicast group. In some embodiments, the replication is based on an output list populated based on multicast group reports sent from the DCNs to the MFE implementing the distributed multicast logical router. This replication (at 840) corresponds to data message 3 in
The process (at 860) replicates the multicast data message to other MFEs executing on other host machines that have reported participation in the multicast group of the multicast data message. In some embodiments, these replicated multicast data messages are sent over tunnels (indicated in
The process replicates (at 870) the multicast data message to the MFE executing on the same host machine as the local multicast router that connects to an external network. In some embodiments, the local multicast router is a logical local multicast router selected from a set of one or more active service routers executing on a set of host machines acting as gateways for the logical network. Data message 7 of
The bus 1105 collectively represents all system, peripheral, and chipset buses that communicatively connect the numerous internal devices of the electronic system 1100. For instance, the bus 1105 communicatively connects the processing unit(s) 1110 with the read-only memory 1130, the system memory 1125, and the permanent storage device 1135.
From these various memory units, the processing unit(s) 1110 retrieve instructions to execute and data to process in order to execute the processes of the invention. The processing unit(s) may be a single processor or a multi-core processor in different embodiments.
The read-only-memory (ROM) 1130 stores static data and instructions that are needed by the processing unit(s) 1110 and other modules of the electronic system. The permanent storage device 1135, on the other hand, is a read-and-write memory device. This device is a non-volatile memory unit that stores instructions and data even when the electronic system 1100 is off. Some embodiments of the invention use a mass-storage device (such as a magnetic or optical disk and its corresponding disk drive) as the permanent storage device 1135.
Other embodiments use a removable storage device (such as a floppy disk, flash drive, etc.) as the permanent storage device. Like the permanent storage device 1135, the system memory 1125 is a read-and-write memory device. However, unlike storage device 1135, the system memory is a volatile read-and-write memory, such as random access memory. The system memory stores some of the instructions and data that the processor needs at runtime. In some embodiments, the invention's processes are stored in the system memory 1125, the permanent storage device 1135, and/or the read-only memory 1130. From these various memory units, the processing unit(s) 1110 retrieve instructions to execute and data to process in order to execute the processes of some embodiments.
The bus 1105 also connects to the input and output devices 1140 and 1145. The input devices enable the user to communicate information and select commands to the electronic system. The input devices 1140 include alphanumeric keyboards and pointing devices (also called “cursor control devices”). The output devices 1145 display images generated by the electronic system. The output devices include printers and display devices, such as cathode ray tubes (CRT) or liquid crystal displays (LCD). Some embodiments include devices such as a touchscreen that function as both input and output devices.
Finally, as shown in
Some embodiments include electronic components, such as microprocessors, storage and memory that store computer program instructions in a machine-readable or computer-readable medium (alternatively referred to as computer-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or machine-readable storage media). Some examples of such computer-readable media include RAM, ROM, read-only compact discs (CD-ROM), recordable compact discs (CD-R), rewritable compact discs (CD-RW), read-only digital versatile discs (e.g., DVD-ROM, dual-layer DVD-ROM), a variety of recordable/rewritable DVDs (e.g., DVD-RAM, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, etc.), flash memory (e.g., SD cards, mini-SD cards, micro-SD cards, etc.), magnetic and/or solid state hard drives, read-only and recordable Blu-Ray® discs, ultra density optical discs, any other optical or magnetic media, and floppy disks. The computer-readable media may store a computer program that is executable by at least one processing unit and includes sets of instructions for performing various operations. Examples of computer programs or computer code include machine code, such as is produced by a compiler, and files including higher-level code that are executed by a computer, an electronic component, or a microprocessor using an interpreter.
While the above discussion primarily refers to microprocessor or multi-core processors that execute software, some embodiments are performed by one or more integrated circuits, such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs). In some embodiments, such integrated circuits execute instructions that are stored on the circuit itself.
As used in this specification, the terms “computer”, “server”, “processor”, and “memory” all refer to electronic or other technological devices. These terms exclude people or groups of people. For the purposes of the specification, the terms display or displaying means displaying on an electronic device. As used in this specification, the terms “computer readable medium,” “computer readable media,” and “machine readable medium” are entirely restricted to tangible, physical objects that store information in a form that is readable by a computer. These terms exclude any wireless signals, wired download signals, and any other ephemeral signals.
This specification refers throughout to computational and network environments that include virtual machines (VMs). However, virtual machines are merely one example of data compute nodes (DCNs) or data compute end nodes, also referred to as addressable nodes. DCNs may include non-virtualized physical hosts, virtual machines, containers that run on top of a host operating system without the need for a hypervisor or separate operating system, and hypervisor kernel network interface modules.
VMs, in some embodiments, operate with their own guest operating systems on a host machine using resources of the host machine virtualized by virtualization software (e.g., a hypervisor, virtual machine monitor, etc.). The tenant (i.e., the owner of the VM) can choose which applications to operate on top of the guest operating system. Some containers, on the other hand, are constructs that run on top of a host operating system without the need for a hypervisor or separate guest operating system. In some embodiments, the host operating system uses name spaces to isolate the containers from each other and therefore provides operating-system level segregation of the different groups of applications that operate within different containers. This segregation is akin to the VM segregation that is offered in hypervisor-virtualized environments that virtualize system hardware, and thus can be viewed as a form of virtualization that isolates different groups of applications that operate in different containers. Such containers are more lightweight than VMs.
Hypervisor kernel network interface modules, in some embodiments, is a non-VM DCN that includes a network stack with a hypervisor kernel network interface and receive/transmit threads. One example of a hypervisor kernel network interface module is the vmknic module that is part of the ESXi™ hypervisor of VMware, Inc.
It should be understood that while the specification refers to VMs, the examples given could be any type of DCNs, including physical hosts, VMs, non-VM containers, and hypervisor kernel network interface modules. In fact, the example networks could include combinations of different types of DCNs in some embodiments.
While the invention has been described with reference to numerous specific details, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. In addition, a number of the figures (including
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/652,196, filed Jul. 17, 2017, now published as U.S. Patent Publication 2019/0020490. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/652,196, now published as U.S. Patent Publication 2019/0020490, is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5079767 | Perlman | Jan 1992 | A |
5128926 | Perlman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
6154463 | Aggarwal et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
7317722 | Aquino et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7802000 | Huang et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7925778 | Wijnands et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8111633 | Aggarwal et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8537816 | Anumala et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8665887 | Ge et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8908686 | Ghosh | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9043452 | Fulton | May 2015 | B2 |
9137045 | Chen et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9270585 | Manion et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9432204 | Shen et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9479348 | Sreeramoju et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9602385 | Tessmer et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9692655 | Koponen et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9794079 | Tessmer et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10015643 | Zuniga et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10198492 | O'Neill et al. | Feb 2019 | B1 |
10218523 | Boutros et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10263884 | Kota et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10454833 | Bosshart et al. | Oct 2019 | B1 |
10484303 | Shepherd et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10503565 | Guo et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10511548 | Liu et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10523455 | Boutros et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10873473 | Boutros et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
10904134 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10958462 | Boutros et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11063872 | Mathew et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
11595296 | Selvaraj et al. | Feb 2023 | B2 |
20030088696 | McCanne | May 2003 | A1 |
20030152098 | Zhu | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165140 | Tang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040258003 | Kokot et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060153219 | Wong et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070104192 | Yoon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090147786 | Li et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090279701 | Moisand et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110158113 | Nanda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110211517 | Moscibroda et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120033668 | Humphries | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130044641 | Koponen et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051399 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130058229 | Casado et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130103817 | Koponen et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130107699 | Miclea | May 2013 | A1 |
20130107883 | Ashwood-Smith | May 2013 | A1 |
20130114466 | Koponen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117428 | Koponen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117429 | Koponen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128886 | Shah | May 2013 | A1 |
20130188521 | Jain | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130287026 | Davie | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130322443 | Dunbar | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329605 | Nakil | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140003427 | Nishi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140064142 | Mylarappa et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098813 | Mishra et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140098815 | Mishra | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140185613 | Sato | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140198661 | Raman et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140223435 | Chang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140328159 | Rebella et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150009995 | Gross, IV et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016286 | Ganichev et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016460 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150016469 | Ganichev et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150055651 | Shen et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055652 | Yong | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150058968 | Wang et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150063364 | Thakkar et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150103843 | Chandrashekhar et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150139238 | Pourzandi et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150263899 | Tubaltsev et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150281125 | Koponen et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160092257 | Wang et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092259 | Mehta et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094365 | Subramaniyam et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094366 | Wang et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094396 | Chandrashekhar et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160094398 | Choudhury et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105333 | Lenglet et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160226671 | Lemoine | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241410 | Lemoine | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20180063193 | Chandrashekhar | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20190007342 | Wang et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190020490 | Boutros et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190020491 | Boutros et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190020492 | Boutros et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190182061 | Boutros et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200036646 | Mathew et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200067818 | Jeuk et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20210218587 | Mishra et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210243253 | Pang et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210314263 | Mathew et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
20220045875 | Zhou et al. | Feb 2022 | A1 |
20220231875 | Karunakaran et al. | Jul 2022 | A1 |
20220417132 | Selvaraj et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220417133 | Selvaraj et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101102214 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101222346 | Jul 2008 | CN |
103516542 | Jan 2014 | CN |
104243323 | Dec 2014 | CN |
104426681 | Mar 2015 | CN |
104871483 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105684363 | Jun 2016 | CN |
106165358 | Nov 2016 | CN |
106850878 | Jun 2017 | CN |
1876766 | Jan 2008 | EP |
3656099 | May 2020 | EP |
2529705 | Mar 2016 | GB |
2015054671 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015142404 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2019018261 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Commonly Owned International Patent Application PCT/US2018/042234, dated Sep. 21, 2018, 11 pages, International Searching Authority (EPO). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210111914 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15652196 | Jul 2017 | US |
Child | 17129788 | US |