The invention relates to a distribution boom for a concrete pump comprising at least two boom arms and to a mobile concrete pump comprising a corresponding distribution boom.
Mobile concrete pumps routinely have a boom arranged on a movable base with a delivery line conducted therealong through which flowable concrete can be pumped. The boom in this case comprises a plurality of boom arms which can each be pivoted relative to one another perpendicular to the longitudinal direction of the boom arms.
This pivoting makes it possible in principle for the boom to be assembled in such a manner that it does not exceed a predefined maximum height when combined with the movable base. The predefined maximum height in this case may correspond to customary road traffic clearances, for example, so that the mobile concrete pump is able to pass under bridges and through tunnels too.
So that the boom can be folded into the smallest size possible and so that the greatest possible maximum number of boom arms can be achieved, it is known in the art for individual boom arms to be cranked. This allows the boom arms to be laid alongside one another in part during fold together about the pivot axes described, so that the bundle of folded boom arms has a smaller height than a corresponding bundle of folded boom arms in which no boom arm is cranked.
For example, in the case of booms for concrete pumps with a total of five RZ-fold boom arms, the third boom arm must have a cranked design such that in the folded state the first two boom arms basically lie alongside the last two boom arms. However, the box-shaped building space required by the boom arms when the boom is in the folded state is not optimally used. In other words, the boom arms in this case take up a substantially greater volume than would result from the total volume of the individual boom arms.
The problem addressed by the present invention is that of creating a distribution boom for a concrete pump and a mobile concrete pump which is improved by comparison with the prior art.
This problem is solved by a distribution boom in accordance with the main claim and a mobile concrete pump in accordance with the dependent claim 12. Advantageous developments are the subject matter of the dependent claims.
Consequently, the invention relates to a distribution boom for a concrete pump comprising at least a first and a second boom arm, wherein the first and the second boom arm are connected to one another via a joint and are pivotable relative to one another via the joint about a pivot axis, wherein a concrete delivery line is provided along the boom arms, and wherein the joint connects the first and the second boom arm in a manner offset to one another in the axial direction of the pivot axis in such a manner that the load-bearing structures of each of the two boom arms intersect a separating plane running perpendicular to the pivot axis between the first and the second boom arms only in the joint, wherein a hydraulic cylinder is arranged on one boom arm, said hydraulic cylinder being connected to the other boom arm via one or more coupling rods in such a manner that a relative pivoting movement of the two boom arms relative to one another about the pivot axis of the joint can be effected by the hydraulic cylinder.
The invention further relates to a mobile concrete pump having a distribution boom according to the invention.
A few terms used in conjunction with the invention are explained to begin with.
The “load-bearing structure” of a boom arm refers to that part of the structure of a boom arm that substantially receives the loads acting on the boom arm during correct use of the distribution boom. The load-bearing structure of a boom arm is usually configured as a hollow profile. The load-bearing structure of a boom arm does not include, in particular, attachments or extensions of the load-bearing structure which receive no forces, or only negligible forces, when there are loads acting on the boom arm. A concrete delivery line conducted along a boom arm may run at least sectionally on the outside of the boom arm and/or in the inside thereof.
Since it is provided according to the invention that the load-bearing structures of the first and second boom arm only intersect the separating plane running between them in the joint connecting them (in other words, the load-bearing arms do not intersect this separating plane away from the joint), the load-bearing structures of the two boom arms cannot impede one another. Consequently, on account of the load-bearing structures of the boom arms themselves, there is no restriction in terms of the relative pivoting movement relative to one another. In principle, however, existing restrictions on the pivoting movement result instead from the joint or the kinematic chain for triggering the pivoting movement. As the kinematic chain for pivoting the boom arms relative to one another, a hydraulic cylinder is arranged on one of the boom arms in this case which is connected to the other boom arm and/or the lateral projection via one or more coupling rods in such a manner that a relative pivoting movement of the two boom arms relative to one another can be effected by the hydraulic cylinder about the pivot axis of the joint. It is also possible, of course, for the hydraulic cylinder to be supported by a second hydraulic cylinder arranged parallel thereto, wherein the two hydraulic cylinders may each be of smaller dimensions compared with a single hydraulic cylinder with comparable lifting force.
The parts of the boom arm which do not belong to the load-bearing structure may be configured or arranged in such a manner that, although they intersect the separating plane, they do not however impose any (additional) restriction on the pivoting movement. It is of course also possible, however, for the two boom arms as a whole—in other words, not only their load-bearing structures—not to intersect a separating plane running between the first and the second boom arm perpendicular to the pivot axis away from the joint.
When the distribution boom is in the folded state, the load-bearing structures of each of the two boom arms alongside one another lie in the horizontal direction due to the separating plane previously described, but they can easily be arranged overlapping in the vertical direction. In particular, compared with the prior art of a boom with a cranked boom arm, a distribution boom according to the invention can thereby be folded in a more compact manner. Starting from a comparable boom with a cranked boom arm, the installation space required for the folded state can therefore be reduced while the total length remains the same with a distribution boom according to the invention. Alternatively, it is possible for an additional boom arm to be able to be provided with the same installation space with the distribution boom according to the invention, as a result of which the total length of the distribution boom can be increased compared with a comparable boom with a cranked boom arm according to the prior art.
In the case of the distribution boom according to the invention, cranking of a boom arm which is customary in the prior art can be completely dispensed with. Consequently, since particular torsional loads caused by cranking cannot be expected with any of the boom arms of the distribution boom according to the invention, all boom arms can be designed for the bending loads primarily acting on them. By comparison with a cranked boom arm, the load-bearing structure of an uncranked boom arm with a comparable stiffness and load-bearing capacity may be configured with a smaller cross section and therefore a lighter design.
It is possible in principle for the two boom arms to be connected to one another pivotably by a joint pin extending through both boom arms. It is preferable, however, for the joint to have a lateral projection arranged on the second boom arm, which lateral projection protrudes beyond the first boom arm, and the two boom arms are connected to one another pivotably via this lateral projection. The lateral projection therefore protrudes as part of the joint beyond the separating plane between the two boom arms, while the load-bearing structures of each of the boom arms furthermore only intersect the separating plane in the joint. The final connection between the two boom arms or between the first boom arm and the projection of the second boom arm may be similarly configured to the prior art, wherein the boom arms lie in a common plane perpendicular to the pivot axis in the region of the joint. Since, by comparison with a joint pin extending through both boom arms, in the variant with a projection on the second boom arm the joint pin, in particular, can be shorter and has to absorb smaller loads, the embodiment of the joint comprising a projection on the second boom arm usually has a weight advantage.
It is preferable for the joint to have at least one hollow joint pin arranged axially to the pivot axis for carrying fresh concrete from a concrete delivery line on the first boom arm to a concrete delivery line on the second boom arm. Because the fresh concrete is conveyed directly along the pivot axis, an elaborate coupling or flexible hose line for conveying fresh concrete between the concrete delivery lines of the two boom arms which is unfavorable to the pumping of concrete can be dispensed with.
More preferably, the joint comprises two joint pins arranged axially along the pivot axis. If two joint pins—or in other words, a split joint pin—are provided, it is sufficient for only the joint pin located closer to the separating plane to be a hollow joint pin. The other joint pin, on the other hand, need not necessarily be hollow. In this case, the conveyance of fresh concrete is provided only through the joint pin located closer to the separating plane.
In the case of the kinematic chain for pivoting the boom arms relative to one another, the hydraulic cylinder is preferably arranged on the first boom arm. Particularly in cases in which the coupling bars of the kinematic chain engage a projection arranged on the second boom arm, the joint kinematics may be configured to act exclusively perpendicular to the pivot axis. In this way, lateral bending loads on the kinematic chain for pivoting the boom arms can be kept small.
If the joint comprises two pivot pins arranged axially along the pivot axis, lateral bending loads on the kinematic chain can be reduced further still if a coupling rod directly connected to the other (so preferably to the second) boom arm or to the projection arranged on the second boom arm is arranged between the two joint pins.
In this case, it is preferable for the concrete delivery line of one (preferably the first) boom arm to run in the region of the kinematic chain between the hydraulic cylinder and the separating plane. It is thereby ensured that the concrete delivery line cannot crash into the hydraulic cylinder, as a result of which the pivoting range of the joint could be limited or coupling rods not optimally adapted to force transmission in terms of their shape could be necessary.
The at least one hollow joint pin preferably has a free internal diameter of 80 to 200 mm. A corresponding internal diameter is sufficient for the conveyance of fresh concrete or the implementation of a delivery line section configured for this purpose.
It is preferable for an exchangeable delivery line section to be arranged in the at least one hollow joint pin. Because the fresh concrete is not conducted directly along the inner wall of the hollow joint pin, wearing of the joint pin, which would require an expensive replacement, can be avoided. Instead, the delivery line section running in the joint pin can be replaced where necessary. The delivery line section in this case is preferably rotatably coupled to the delivery lines of the boom arms.
The joint preferably has a maximum pivot angle—in other words, the angle between the two end positions of the joint—of more than 150°, more advantageously of more than 175°.
If the distribution boom comprises more than two boom arms, the distribution boom is preferably configured as an articulated arm boom. All boom arms of the distribution boom are then connected to one another via joints in each case, so that two adjacent boom arms can be pivoted about a common pivot axis relative to one another.
In order to explain the concrete pump according to the invention, reference is made to the foregoing comments.
The invention is described by way of example with the help of advantageous embodiments with reference to the attached drawings. In the drawings:
In
The mobile concrete pump 1 is an automatic concrete pump in which the distribution boom 2 is rotatably fastened to a movable base 3. The distribution boom 2 can be opened out and for this purpose it comprises multiple boom arms 4 that can be pivoted relative to one another about joints 5. A concrete delivery line is provided along the boom arms 4 through which fresh concrete can be conveyed with the help of a concrete pump arranged in the base 3. To provide a better overview, only the load-bearing structure of the boom arms 4 is depicted in
The distribution boom 2 comprises a total of five boom arms 4.1, 4′.2, 4″.3, 4.4, 4.5 which can be folded together in an RZ fold—as shown in
The position of the load-bearing structure of each of the individual boom arms 4 in the folded state is also made clear in
The box-shaped installation space which is used by the boom arms 4 of the boom arm 2 according to the invention in the folded state is indicated in
In order to compare the installation space 91 required by a distribution boom 2 according to the invention, the installation space 91 of a boom 100 according to the prior art is shown in
In the case of the boom 100 according to the prior art, the middle boom arm 101′ is cranked so that when it is in the folded state, the two outer boom arms 101 come to lie in a plane alongside the two lower boom arms 101. Due to the cranking of the middle boom arm 101′ provided for in the prior art, a comparatively large installation space 91 is, however, required on account of the not inconsiderable unused regions 102 within the installation space.
As immediately shown by a comparison between
In order to achieve the smaller installation space requirement compared with the prior art, it is provided according to the invention that the load-bearing structures of two adjacent boom arms—that of the boom arms 4′.2 and 4″.3 in the exemplary embodiment shown—are connected to one another via a joint in such a manner that a separating plane 90 may be found between them which runs perpendicular to the common pivot axis 92 and which is not intersected by the load-bearing structure of the two boom arms 4′.2 and 4″.3 in each case. It is advantageous but not strictly necessary that none of the other boom arms 4.1, 4.4, 4.5 and possibly 4.6 intersects the separating plane 90 (cf.
Different variants of joints 5 are depicted in
In the case of the joint variant according to
For the pivoting movement, a kinematic chain 20 comprising a hydraulic pressure cylinder 21, coupling rod 22, articulated lever 23 and guide rod 24 is provided. The articulated lever 23 is fastened to the joint pin 7 in a non-rotatable manner, so that a pivoting movement of the articulated lever 23 in respect of the first boom arm 4′ results in a pivoting movement of the second boom arm 4″. By means of the pressure cylinder 21, force can be applied to the articulated lever 23 via the coupling rod 22 guided by the guide rod 24, so that the desired pivoting movement is achieved.
The joint pin 7 has a hollow design with an internal diameter of 150 mm for the conveyance of fresh concrete, wherein an exchangeable delivery line section 8 is arranged through the joint pin 7 via which a concrete delivery line 9′ on the first boom arm 4′ is connected to a concrete delivery line 9″ on the second boom arm 4″. The delivery line section 8 in this case is rotatably fastened in respect of the concrete delivery lines 9′, 9″.
The joint variant in
The two boom arms 4′, 4″ are pivotably connected to one another via the projection 10 by two joint pins 7 about the pivot axis 92. The two joint pins 7 are hollow in this case, so that an exchangeable delivery line section 8 for connecting the concrete delivery lines 9′, 9″ on both boom arms 4′, 4″ can be guided through both joint pins.
The kinematic chain 20 for the pivoting movement of the two boom arms 4′, 4″ relative to one another is arranged within the first boom arm 4′ and comprises—as can be seen in particular in the sectional view in
In the case of the joint variant according to
The projection 10 and therefore the second boom arm 4″ are pivotably mounted in respect of the first boom arm 4′ via two hollow pivot pins 7 arranged along the pivot axis 92.
The kinematic chain 20 is completely arranged in the region of the first boom arm 4′ and the projection 10 and comprises, in addition to two parallel-running coupling rods 22 and a guide rod 24, a hydraulic traction cylinder 21′. The traction cylinder 21′ is connected via the two coupling rods 22 to the projection 10, wherein the connection point between the traction cylinder 21′ and coupling rods 22 is conducted through the guide rod 24.
Even if both joint pins 7 are hollow in this exemplary embodiment, the concrete delivery line 9′ of the first boom arm 4′ is placed in the region of the joint 5 and, in particular, of the kinematic chain 20 between the hydraulic cylinder 21′ and the separating plane 90, so that the delivery line section 8 for the conveyance of fresh concrete is only guided through the joint pin 7 arranged closer to the separating plane 90. It is thereby ensured that the concrete delivery line 9′ does not obstruct the hydraulic traction cylinder 21′ or the kinematic chain 20.
It is also possible, of course, for the joint variant according to
All exemplary embodiments and joint variants shown have a maximum pivot angle of 180°.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 208 032.9 | May 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/062108 | 5/9/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/206702 | 11/15/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3253677 | Krynytzky | May 1966 | A |
3685543 | Schwing | Aug 1972 | A |
4625760 | Mertens | Dec 1986 | A |
5045217 | Ronan | Sep 1991 | A |
5640996 | Schlecht | Jun 1997 | A |
6675822 | Schmitz | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6755259 | Peltola | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6808025 | Bissen | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7055613 | Bissen | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7654286 | Fuegel | Feb 2010 | B2 |
9061168 | Mikota | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9376827 | Hasel | Jun 2016 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202214988 | May 2012 | CN |
204098505 | Jan 2015 | CN |
104514375 | Apr 2015 | CN |
202004003077 | May 2004 | DE |
102013218383 | Mar 2015 | DE |
102014203054 | Sep 2015 | DE |
0037571 | Oct 1981 | EP |
0037571 | Jun 1986 | EP |
78730 | Mar 1995 | JP |
20060045623 | May 2006 | KR |
Entry |
---|
“GMB 34—Technical Specification”, for Ruhroel GmbH Gelsenkirchen-Horst, F.W. Schwing. GmbH Construction Vehicle Factory, Attachment A2.2, Schwing, , Version 2; Jan. 24, 1992, 64 pgs. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2018/062108. |
Chinese Search Report for Application No. 2018800311878 filed May 9, 2018; Dated: Jan. 12, 2021; 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200217093 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |