The invention relates to a distribution device in the subscriber access area, in particular in cable junction boxes, splice boxes or terminal boxes.
Distribution devices in the subscriber access area are physically located between a switching center and the subscriber. Typical installation sites are cable junction boxes, splice boxes or terminal boxes.
Broadband data transmission via telephone lines has become increasingly important. The system providers therefore face the technical problem of how to provide these broadband services to an increasing number of subscribers in a flexible manner. Approaches to a solution for this are known in which a DSLAM and its associated splitters are integrated in the distribution device in the subscriber access area, with the jumpering which is then necessary being performed manually. However, this is very time-consuming since some of the individual distribution devices are scattered far and wide.
The invention is therefore based on the technical problem of providing a distribution device in the subscriber access area which improves the availability of broadband data services.
To this end, the distribution device in the subscriber access area comprises two changeover devices, two switching matrices, a DSLAM having associated splitter modules, and at least one controller, in which the first changeover device comprises m inputs, m first outputs and m second outputs, with a first and a second output having one associated changeover element by means of which an associated input can be selectively connected to the first or to the second output, the second changeover device comprises m first inputs, m second inputs and m outputs, with a first input and a second input having one associated changeover element by means of which an associated output can be selectively connected to the first or to the second input, the first switching matrix has m inputs and n outputs, and the second switching matrix has n inputs and m outputs, where n<m, the inputs of the first changeover device can be connected to a switching center, the first outputs of the first changeover device are connected to the first inputs of the second changeover device, and the second outputs of the first changeover device are connected to the inputs of the first switching matrix, the second inputs of the second changeover device are connected to the outputs of the second switching matrix, and the outputs of the second changeover device can be connected to subscriber lines, the splitter modules have POTS connections, data connections and POTS/data connections, with the outputs of the first switching matrix being connected to the POTS connections, the data connections being connected to the DSLAM, and the POTS/data connections being connected to the inputs of the second switching matrix, and the controller switches the first and second changeover devices and switching matrices. It should be noted here that the inputs of the first changeover device do not have to be connected directly to the switching center, and the outputs of the second changeover device do not have to be connected directly to the subscribers. It should also be noted that the flow of information is bidirectional. The terms input and output have therefore been chosen for a flow of information from the switching center to the subscriber for simplicity.
The advantage of the invention is that a broadband data service is automatically allocated to a subscriber by switching over the changeover devices or switching matrices. In the basic state, the two changeover devices are switched in such a way here that the signals from the first output of the first changeover device to the first input of the second changeover device are switched-through to the output of the second changeover device. If a subscriber then wants a broadband data service, such as VDSL, the associated input of the subscriber is connected to the second output in the first changeover device. The second input of the second changeover device is accordingly connected to the associated output. Furthermore, an as yet unused XDSL channel is selected and is connected to the associated input of the first switching matrix or to the associated output of the second switching matrix via the two switching matrices. This is possible because each input of the switching matrix can be connected to each output of the switching matrix by means of the switching matrix. A broadband data service can thus be automatically allocated to a subscriber by remote control without manual jumpering. The percentage of possible allocations is defined here by the n/m ratio of the switching matrices, although these may be replaced as required. Overall, this produces a very simple system which can be easily modularly upgraded. One further advantage is that the basic services can also be jumpered by means of the distribution device. For this purpose, an input, which is associated with a subscriber, of the first changeover device is connected to the second output of the first changeover device, associated with a free output of the switching matrix by means of the first switching matrix, and fed into the second switching matrix by means of the splitter. Any second input and thus also output of the second changeover device can then be selected by means of the second switching matrix.
In one preferred embodiment, the controller is a constituent part of the DSLAM. This DSLAM already has controllers which can then be used simultaneously to control the switching matrices and changeover devices.
In one further embodiment, the changeover elements of the changeover device are in the form of relays. These relays have the advantage of being very reliable and having good transmission characteristics. However, microelectronic or micromechanical switches are also feasible in principle.
In one further preferred embodiment, the relays are in the form of bistable or monostable changeover switches. The advantage of the monostable embodiment is that the POTS signals can continue to be switched if the electrical power supply for the distribution device fails. In contrast, the advantage of the bistable embodiment is that the configurations, that is to say the allocation of the broadband services to the subscribers, are maintained.
The invention is explained in greater detail in the text which follows with reference to a preferred exemplary embodiment. The single FIGURE shows a schematic block diagram of a distribution device in the subscriber access area.
The distribution device 1 in the subscriber access area comprises two changeover devices 2, 3, two switching matrices 4, 5, a DSLAM 6 and a number of splitter modules 7. The first changeover device 2 comprises m inputs 8, m first outputs 9 and m second outputs 10. The inputs 8 of the first changeover device 2 are connected to wires or cables from or to a switching center (not illustrated). For this purpose, the inputs 8 are preferably in the form of multipole plug connectors. The first outputs 9 are connected to first inputs 11 of the second changeover device 3. The second outputs 10 are connected to inputs 12 of the first switching matrix 4, with the first switching matrix 4 likewise having m inputs 12. The first changeover device 2 comprises m changeover elements 13 by means of which an input 8 can be selectively connected to its associated first output 9 or second output 10. In this case, the changeover elements 13 are preferably in the form of bistable changeover relays. The changeover elements 13 are switched here by a control signal S which is generated by a controller 14 of the DSLAM 6. The n outputs 15 of the first switching matrix 4 are connected to n splitter modules 7, with only one splitter module 7 being illustrated, for reasons of clarity. In this case, the splitter modules 7 are preferably arranged together in groups on a printed equipment card. The outputs 15 are connected to the POTS connections 16 of the splitter modules 7, while the data connections 17 of the splitter modules 7 are connected to the DSLAM 6. The POTS/data connections 18 of the splitter modules 7 are connected to the n inputs 19 of the second switching matrix 5. The outputs 20 of the second switching matrix 5 are then connected to the second inputs 21 of the second changeover device 3. The second changeover device 3 likewise comprises changeover elements 22 by means of which the associated first input 11 or second input 21 can each be selectively connected to the associated output 23 of the changeover device 3. The outputs 23 are then connected to wires or cables which lead to the subscribers, with the outputs 23 preferably being in the form of multipole plug connectors, like the inputs 8 of the first changeover device 2. Each input 12, 19 can be connected to each output 15, 20 by means of the switching matrices 4, 5.
As can be seen, the first changeover device 2 and the first switching matrix 4 have mirror-image symmetry with respect to the second changeover device 3 and the second switching matrix 5, so that identical components can be used here.
The process of a subscriber switching from a pure POTS service to an enhanced service will now be briefly explained in more detail. In the basic state, the m inputs 8 of the first changeover device are connected to the m first outputs 9, and the m first inputs 11 of the second changeover device 3 are connected to the m outputs 23 of the second changeover device 3, that is to say the subscribers are provided with only a POTS service. If a subscriber then additionally wishes to take advantage of a broadband service, his input 8 is connected to its associated second output 10. At the first switching matrix 4, the associated input 12, which is connected to the output 10, is then connected to an output 15, which is connected to an unused splitter module 7, of the switching matrix 4. An association between the subscriber and the splitter module 7 is then formed in the DSLAM 6, so that the broadband data (e.g. XDSL) arriving via a glass-fiber cable 24 is then transmitted to the subscriber of the associated splitter module 7. In the splitter module 7, the POTS and data signals are combined in the signal direction toward the subscriber, and the signal is separated into POTS and data signals in the direction toward the switching center. The associated POTS/data connection 18 of the splitter module 7 is connected to an associated input 19 of the second switching matrix 5. This input 19 is then connected to the second input 21, which is associated with the subscriber, of the changeover device 3 by means of the switching matrix 5. The second input 21 is accordingly connected to the output 23 by the changeover element 22. A broadband data service can thus be allocated to a subscriber without manual jumpering. In addition to this automatic allocation of broadband data services, the distribution device also allows automatic jumpering of the subscriber lines themselves. For example, if a subscriber moves, his input 8 can be associated with another second input 21 of the second changeover device 3 by means of the two switching matrices 4, 5. If the outputs 23 of the subscribers j, k are to be exchanged for example, the two associated inputs 8 are connected to the second outputs 10 and associated with the other respective inputs 21 by means of the second switching matrix, each of these inputs then being switched-through to the output 23 by the changeover elements 22.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 022 547 | May 2005 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/004420 | 5/11/2006 | WO | 00 | 6/19/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/122699 | 11/23/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4430732 | Saga et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4609778 | Franklin et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4833708 | Goodrich | May 1989 | A |
5522042 | Fee et al. | May 1996 | A |
5542854 | Bowen | Aug 1996 | A |
5552962 | Feustel et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5754404 | Biermann et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764754 | Ortel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790546 | Dobbins et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5903372 | Czerwiec | May 1999 | A |
5905781 | McHale et al. | May 1999 | A |
5949763 | Lund | Sep 1999 | A |
6067316 | Amrany et al. | May 2000 | A |
6148006 | Dyke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6215855 | Schneider | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266348 | Gross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6325636 | Hipp et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335936 | Bossemeyer, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349123 | Kim | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370137 | Lund | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370149 | Gorman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400713 | Thomas et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6477238 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493318 | Bare | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6597689 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6625019 | Steinman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640239 | Gidwani | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6674756 | Rao et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6754329 | Teixeira | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757382 | Wilkes, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6819746 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826280 | Sajadi et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6868092 | Bell et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6944361 | Xue et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944555 | Blackett et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6954463 | Ma et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6977925 | Pittman | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7092364 | Franklin et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7103650 | Vetrivelkumaran et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7154884 | Dove et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7194538 | Rabe et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7292531 | Hill | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7293109 | Ott et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295566 | Chiu et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7328260 | Muthiyan et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7339936 | Valadarsky et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7415207 | Lanzone et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430161 | Hidaka | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7463637 | Bou-Diab et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7475274 | Davidson | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7483438 | Serghi et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486698 | Betts et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7505413 | Gous | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512125 | Betts et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7561571 | Lovett et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7570585 | DePaul et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7570587 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7593607 | Beshai et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7849225 | Schofield et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864773 | Ah Sue | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7957269 | Tu et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20010015978 | Blanset et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031111 | Irwin | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020080445 | Falkenstein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101818 | Teixeira | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020101864 | Teixeira | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020106075 | Foss et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020168054 | Klos et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020181475 | Dove et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191777 | Milbrandt et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030120817 | Ott et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030231744 | Grosse-Boes et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040076284 | Baker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040120508 | Sajadi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040217881 | Pedyash et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040228468 | Cook | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050074021 | Bossemeyer, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050152340 | Voit et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050195584 | AbuGhazaleh et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070211642 | Franzke et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211740 | Franzke et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211882 | Hatte et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211883 | Franzke et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080059651 | Ashwood Smith | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080266049 | Franzke | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101 04 705 | Aug 2002 | DE |
0 648 061 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0 858 221 | Aug 1998 | EP |
1 229 745 | Aug 2002 | EP |
WO 0120922 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0203594 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 2005091613 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006063951 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006122698 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006122699 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007060196 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/914,680, filed Jul. 20, 2008 entitled “Active Distribution Device in a Subscriber Connection Area”. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,861 (OA Oct. 29, 2009; Resp. Mar. 1, 2010; Final OA Jun. 22, 2010; Resp. Oct. 22, 2010). |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,653 (OA Oct. 1, 2009; Resp. Feb. 1, 2010; Final OA May 17, 2010; Resp. Oct. 22, 2010). |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,849 (OA Mar. 6, 2009; Resp. Sep. 8, 2009; Final OA Mar. 17, 2010; Resp Sep. 17, 2010). |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,667 (OA Oct. 29, 2009; Resp. Mar. 1, 2010; Final OA Jun. 16, 2010). |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,861 (OA Feb. 22, 2011), 25 pgs. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,653 (OA Jan. 26, 2011), 16 pgs. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,667 (Resp. Dec. 16, 2010; OA Apr. 1, 2011; Resp. Sep. 1, 2011; Final OA Sep. 30, 2011, 92 pgs. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,861 (Resp. Jun. 22, 2011; Final OA Aug. 24, 2011), 42 pgs. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/503,653 (Resp. Jun. 27, 2011; Final OA Aug. 25, 2011), 33 pgs. |
Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 11/914,680 (OA Sep. 7, 2011), 14 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090129568 A1 | May 2009 | US |