An electronic trading system generally includes a trading device in communication with an electronic exchange. The electronic exchange sends information about a market for a tradeable object (market information), such as prices and quantities, to the trading device. The trading device sends messages, such as messages related to orders, to the electronic exchange. The electronic exchange attempts to match quantity of an order with quantity of one or more contra-side orders.
Electronic exchanges have continued increasing the amount of market information provided to the trading device. This increase provides various benefits and problems. For example, increasing the amount of market information may increase transparency about the market. In another example, some trading devices—such as mobile devices—are connected to the exchange via a connection that has bandwidth, download, or data limitations. Increasing the amount of market information may cause trading devices to reach their bandwidth, download, or data allowance/limitations sooner. In another example, trading devices have limited processing capacity. Increasing the amount of market information transmitted to the trading device may result in processing problems for the trading device. In yet another example, traders may not be able to comprehend (mentally process) all the information displayed on the trading device. As a result, increasing the amount of market information may be distracting to the trader and cause them to lose focus.
There is a need to effectively control the amount of market information transmitted through an electronic trading system.
Certain embodiments are disclosed with reference to the following drawings.
Certain embodiments will be better understood when read in conjunction with the provided figures, which illustrate examples. It should be understood, however, that the embodiments are not limited to the arrangements and instrumentality shown in the attached figures.
The present embodiments relate to distribution of market data based on price level transitions. Market data may be distributed when one or more price level transitions are identified.
A price level transition includes a change at one or more price levels that trigger distribution of market data. For example, a price level transition may be a change from “quantity available” to “no quantity available” at one or more price levels. By way of illustration, this price level transition may include a change from no available bids or offers at a price level to some available bids or offers at that price level. The reverse (e.g., “no quantity available” to “quantity available”) is also a price level transition. For example, a change from “no quantity available” to “quantity available” at a particular price level is also an exemplary price level transition. Another exemplary price level transition is a change in the last traded price. Yet another exemplary price level transition is a change in the overall quantity available above or below an overall quantity threshold. Another exemplary price level transition may be a new high or low price level for a trading session. Other price level transitions may be used as triggers for distribution of market data.
In some embodiments, market data is only distributed when one or more price level transitions are identified. For example, while a gateway may continuously/periodically receive market data from an exchange, the gateway may send the market data to the trading device only when a price level transition is identified. This may reduce the amount of information distributed to the trading device but allow the market data to be distributed when certain shifts in the market occur.
In some embodiments, in addition to distributing market data when a price level transition is identified, market data may be periodically distributed at the end of a defined time period regardless of whether or not a price level transition is identified. For example, market data may be coalesced, for example, at a gateway and delivered periodically to a trading device. Coalescing relates to combining market data to provide the most up-to-date data over a given time period. In some embodiments, market data may be distributed prior to the expiration of the time period when a price level transition is identified. Instead of waiting until the end of the time period, the coalesced market data may be transmitted anytime a price level transition is identified. This may be particularly beneficial when the coalescing periods are longer. As another example, market data is distributed to a trading device at the end of a coalescing period only when a price level transition occurs during a coalescing period. This may reduce the need to send market data even at the end of the coalescing period.
In some embodiments, a system includes an electronic exchange adapted to receive order messages for a tradeable object and transmit a price feed including market data related to one or more unmatched orders for the tradeable object. The system may also include a gateway adapted to receive the price feed, coalesce market data, and distribute the market data. The system may also include a trading device that is adapted to receive the market data from the gateway and display the market data on a display device. A price level transition is a change at a price level that triggers distribution of market data. The gateway is configured to identify one or more price level transitions and transmits the market data in response to identifying the one or more price level transitions.
In some embodiments, a method for distributing market data includes receiving, using a computing device, market data, including information about prices and quantities, for a tradeable object. The method may further include identifying, using the computing device, one or more price level transitions, where a price level transition is a change at a price level that triggers distribution of market data. The method may further include distributing, using the computing device, market data in response to identifying the one or more price level transitions.
In some embodiments, a tangible computer readable storage medium includes a set of instructions for execution by a processor. The set of instructions, when executed by a processor, implement a method including receiving, using a computing device, market data including information about prices and quantities for a tradeable object. The set of instructions may implement identifying, using the computing device, one or more price level transitions, where a price level transition is a change at a price level that triggers distribution of market data. The set of instructions may implement distributing, using the computing device, market data in response to identifying the one or more price level transitions.
Although this description discloses embodiments including, among other components, software executed on hardware, it should be noted that the embodiments are merely illustrative and should not be considered as limiting. For example, it is contemplated that any or all of these hardware and software components may be embodied exclusively in hardware, exclusively in software, exclusively in firmware, or in any combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. Accordingly, certain embodiments may be implemented in other ways.
In operation, the trading device 110 may receive market data from the exchange 130 through the gateway 120. A user may utilize the trading device 110 to monitor this market data and/or base a decision to send an order message to buy or sell one or more tradeable objects to the exchange 130.
A tradeable object is anything which may be traded. For example, a certain quantity of the tradeable object may be bought or sold for a particular price. A tradeable object may include, for example, financial products, stocks, options, bonds, future contracts, currency, warrants, funds derivatives, securities, commodities, swaps, interest rate products, index-based products, traded events, goods, or a combination thereof. A tradeable object may include a product listed and/or administered by an exchange (for example, the exchange 130), a product defined by the user, a combination of real or synthetic products, or a combination thereof. There may be a synthetic tradeable object that corresponds and/or is similar to a real tradeable object.
Market data may include data about a market for a tradeable object. For example, market data may include the inside market, market depth, last traded price (“LTP”), a last traded quantity (“LTQ”), or a combination thereof. The inside market is the lowest available ask price (best offer) and the highest available bid price (best bid) in the market for a particular tradable object at a particular point in time (since the inside market may vary over time). Market depth refers to quantities available at the inside market and at other prices away from the inside market. Due to the quantity available, there may be “gaps” in market depth.
A data feed is a series of one or more messages that includes market data. Different types of data feeds, such as a price data feeds, order data feeds, fill data feeds, or any other now known or later developed data feeds may be generated and/or distributed. A price data feed may include at least the inside market, market depth, last traded price, and last traded quantity. The data in a price data feed is not specific to a particular market participant. As such, the price data feed may be provided to a plurality of market participants, whether or not these market participants are related. A price data feed may be modified in accordance with an embodiment.
One or more components in the electronic trading system 100 may be configured to distribute market data based on one or more price level transitions. For example, the exchange 130 may generate and/or distribute a price data feed when a price level transition is detected. In another example, a gateway 120 may coalesce a price data feed until a price level transition is recognized. In yet another example, a trading device 110 may update the display of market data in response to detecting a price level transition.
With respect to method 200, changes and modifications, such as additional, different, or fewer acts, may be made to the process shown in
In act 210, a computing device, such as the trading device 110, gateway 120, or exchange 130 of
In act 220, the computing device determines whether a price level transition occurred. Determining the occurrence of a price level transition may include analyzing market data to identify one or more price level transitions. In some embodiments, determining the occurrence of a price level transition may include using one or more price level transition rules to analyze the market data and detect the existence of one or more market conditions. An example of a price level transition rule may be “a price level transition occurs when all the quantity at a particular price level disappears.” Another example of a price level transition rule may be “a price level transition occurs when the last traded price changes.” One or more price level transition rules may be defined for the examples shown in
As discussed in more detail below,
Returning to
In
The illustrated change in the inside market, as shown in
A trading strategy may not be based on a change in quantity (e.g., from 8 bids to 12 bids) at price levels. However, trading strategies do depend on changes from “quantity available” to “no quantity available.” These changes generally represent changes that require action. For example, assume that a spread price is wide (e.g., the prices between two tradeable objects is relatively far apart). As the spread price narrows, the quantities at various price levels will begin to change from “no quantity available” to “quantity available” or vice-versa. Trading strategies may account for the narrowing of spread price. In another example, a trading strategy may lean on the inside market of a particular tradeable object. For purposes of the trading strategy, quantity available at the inside market is sufficient to assume that there is enough to lean on this tradeable object. Accordingly, in both examples, it doesn't matter, for purposes of the trading strategy, how much quantity is available. It only matters, for these examples, that there is some quantity available.
The last traded price may change. This change may be a price level transition. For example, as shown in the example of
Once the modify order is entered, the quantity available at price level 520 changes from 10 (in
Some price levels may be more important than other price levels. As a result, certain price level transitions may be more important. In some embodiments, price level transitions at certain price levels may not trigger distribution of market data. These price level transitions may be disregarded for purposes of distributing market data. In some embodiments, the price level transitions at certain price levels may not even be considered price level transitions for purposes of distributing market data.
The distance from the inside market may be an absolute or relative distance. An example of an absolute distance may include a certain (e.g., defined) number of ticks from the inside market. That example is shown in
The price level transitions that trigger distribution of market data may be set by a user, a trading tool, or set as a default during manufacture, for example. For example, a trader may set which price levels trigger distribution of market data either prior to or during a trading session. In another example, an automated trading tool may set the price levels, for example, based on market activity, trader preferences, or other criteria. The automated trading tool may continuously adjust (e.g., widen/narrow the window shown in
In
Returning to act 220 of the method 200 of
In act 230, the computing device distributes market data. Distributing market data may include generating, sending, transmitting, displaying, or otherwise communicating market data. Distribution may be different for different components. For example, upon detection of a price level transition, an exchange—such as the exchange 130 of
With respect to method 700, changes and modifications, such as additional, different, or fewer acts, may be made to the process shown in
In act 710, a computing device receives market data.
In act 720, the computing device may begin or continue coalescing market data. Coalescing market data may include aggregating market data. For example, market data may be coalesced so the most up-to-date market data is transmitted at the end of a coalescing period. The “stale” (e.g., not the most current) market data may be discarded or not used or eventually not distributed.
In act 730, the computing device may determine whether a coalescing period has ended. A coalescing period (e.g., the period of time that a computing device coalesces market data) may be defined (e.g., 5 seconds) or dynamic (e.g., until a message requesting the coalesced data is received). Determining whether a coalescing period has ended may include using a coalescing timer to measure a period of time for the coalescing period. A coalescing timer may be particularly useful when the coalescing period is defined. By way of example, the coalescing period may have a defined period of time of one (1) second. If the coalescing timer is less than one second, then the coalescing period has not ended. However, if the coalescing timer is equal to or greater than one second, then the coalescing period has ended. As another example, the coalescing period may end when a message requesting the coalesced data is received.
In act 740, when the coalescing period has not ended (“NO” in act 730 of
In act 760, the computing device distributes market data when the coalescing period has ended (“YES” in act 730 of
With respect to method 800, changes and modifications, such as additional, different, or fewer acts, may be made to the process shown in
Certain acts shown in
In act 810, a computing device receives market data.
In act 820, the computing device coalesces market data.
In act 830, the computing device determines whether a coalescing period has ended. If the coalescing period has not ended (“NO” in act 830 of
In the event that the coalescing period has ended (“YES” in act 830 of
In the event that there was a price level transition—for example, either in act 840 or act 860—then the computing device may distribute market data as shown in act 880.
Certain automated trading tools—such as ADL™, AUTOSPREADER®, and/or AUTOTRADER™ provided by Trading Technologies International, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois (“Trading Technologies”)— may not base actions on changes in the quantity available at the various levels in the depth. For instance, an automated trading tool may not take any action based on a change in quantity of 24 at a price level to a quantity in 32 at the same price level. In operation, the automated trading tool may only care (e.g., take action) when there is a change at a price level, such as a change from “quantity available” to “no quantity available” or vice versa or a change in the last traded price, for example. In other words, the automated trading tool generally doesn't base actions on changes in quantity available at a price level at least in part because they change too quickly.
In the example of
The trading device 910a may be similar to the trading device 110 in
As used herein, the phrases “configured to” and “adapted to” encompass that an element, structure, or device has been modified, arranged, changed, or varied to perform a specific function or for a specific purpose.
In some embodiments, the trading device 910a may be implemented as a personal computer running a copy of X_TRADER®, an electronic trading platform provided by Trading Technologies. As another example, the trading device 910a may be a server running a trading application providing automated trading tools such as ADL™, AUTOSPREADER®, and/or AUTOTRADER™, also provided by Trading Technologies. In yet another example, the trading device 910a may include a trading terminal in communication with a server, where collectively the trading terminal and the server are the trading device 910a.
The trading device 910a is generally owned, operated, controlled, programmed, configured, or otherwise used by a user. As used herein, the phrase “user” may include, but is not limited to, a human (for example, a trader), trading group (for example, group of traders), or an electronic trading device (for example, an algorithmic trading system). One or more users may be involved in the ownership, operation, control, programming, configuration, or other use, for example.
The trading device 910a may include one or more trading applications. As used herein, a trading application is an application that facilitates or improves electronic trading. A trading application provides one or more electronic trading tools. For example, a trading application stored by a trading device may be executed to arrange and display market data in one or more trading windows or interfaces. In another example, a trading application may include an automated spread trading application providing spread trading tools. In yet another example, a trading application may include an algorithmic trading application that automatically processes an algorithm and performs certain actions, such as placing an order, modifying an existing order, deleting an order. In yet another example, a trading application may provide one or more trading screens. A trading screen may provide one or more trading tools that allow interaction with one or more markets. For example, a trading tool may allow a user to obtain and view market data, set order entry parameters, submit order messages to an exchange, deploy trading algorithms, and/or monitor positions while implementing various trading strategies. An example of a trading tool may be a value axis. The trading tool may be included as part of a trading interface. The electronic trading tools provided by the trading application may always be available or may be available only in certain configurations or operating modes of the trading application.
A trading application may include computer readable instructions that are stored in a computer readable medium and executable by a processor. A computer readable medium may include various types of volatile and non-volatile storage media, including, for example, random access memory, read-only memory, programmable read-only memory, electrically programmable read-only memory, electrically erasable read-only memory, flash memory, any combination thereof, or any other tangible data storage device. As used herein, the term non-transitory or tangible computer readable medium is expressly defined to include any type of computer readable storage media and to exclude propagating signals.
One or more components or modules of a trading application may be loaded into the computer readable medium of the trading device 910a from another computer readable medium. For example, the trading application (or updates to the trading application) may be stored by a manufacturer, developer, or publisher on one or more CDs or DVDs, which are then loaded onto the trading device 910a or to a server from which the trading device 910a retrieves the trading application. As another example, the trading device 910a may receive the trading application (or updates to the trading application) from a server, for example, via the Internet or an internal network. The trading device 910a may receive the trading application or updates when requested by the trading device 910a (for example, “pull distribution”) and/or un-requested by the trading device 910a (for example, “push distribution”).
The trading device 910a may be adapted to send order messages. For example, the order messages may be sent to through the gateway 120 to the exchange 130. As another example, the trading device 910a may be adapted to send order messages to a simulated exchange in a simulation environment which does not effectuate real-world trades.
The order messages may be sent at the request of a user. For example, a trader may utilize the trading device 910a to send an order message or manually input one or more parameters for a trade order (for example, an order price and/or quantity). As another example, an automated trading tool provided by a trading application may calculate one or more parameters for a trade order and automatically send the order message. In some instances, an automated trading tool may prepare the order message to be sent but not actually send it without confirmation from a user.
An order message may be sent in one or more data packets or through a shared memory system. For example, an order message may be sent from the trading device 910a to the exchange 930a through the gateway 920a. The trading device 910a may communicate with the gateway 920a using a local area network, a wide area network, a wireless network, a virtual private network, a T1 line, a T3 line, an integrated services digital network (“ISDN”) line, a point-of-presence, the Internet, and/or a shared memory system, for example.
The trading device 910a may be adapted to send other messages. For example, the trading device 910a may send a message to the gateway 920a requesting coalesced market data. In response, the gateway 920a would respond with the coalesced market data.
As shown in
In some embodiments, the trading device 910a may include one or more trading applications that distribute market data based on one or more price level transitions. For example, the trading terminal 914a may include a trading application that only displays market data in response to detection of one or more price level transitions. This may reduce the amount of market data that is displayed on the trading terminal. As a result, the display may be less confusing or cluttered or busy as a result of less market data being displayed. In another example, the server 912a may only transmit market data to the trading terminal in response to identification of one or more price level transitions. This may reduce the amount of market data that is passed back and/or forth between the server 912a and trading terminal 914a.
The trading device 910a may communicate with the gateway 920a using one or more communication networks. As used herein, a communication network is any network, including the Internet, which facilitates or enables communication between, for example, the trading device 910a, the gateway 920a and the exchange 920a. For example, as shown in
The gateway 920a, which may be similar to the gateway 120 of
The gateway 920a may communicate with the exchange 930a using one or more communication networks. For example, as shown in
The gateway 920a may facilitate communication. For example, the gateway 920a may perform protocol translation for data communicated between the trading device 910a and the exchange 930a. The gateway 920a may process an order message received from the trading device 910a into a data format understood by the exchange 930a, for example. Similarly, the gateway 920a may transform market data in an exchange-specific format received from the exchange 930a into a format understood by the trading device 910a, for example.
The gateway 920a may include a trading application, similar to the trading applications discussed above, that facilitates or improves electronic trading. For example, the gateway 920a may include a trading application that tracks orders from the trading device 910a and updates the status of the order based on fill confirmations received from the exchange 930a. As another example, the gateway 920a may include a trading application that coalesces market data from the exchange 930a and provides it to the trading device 910a. In yet another example, the gateway 920a may include a trading application that provides risk processing, calculates implieds, handles order processing, handles market data processing, or a combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the gateway 920a may include one or more trading applications that distribute market data based on one or more price level transitions. For example, the price server 924a may include a trading application that only transmits a price feed in response to detection of one or more price level transitions. This may reduce the amount of price updates that are sent to the trading device 910a. As a result, the amount of market data that is passed back and/or forth between the gateway 920a and the trading device 910a may be optimally reduced.
In certain embodiments, the gateway 920a communicates with the exchange 130 using a local area network, a wide area network, a virtual private network, a T1 line, a T3 line, an ISDN line, a point-of-presence, the Internet, and/or a shared memory system, for example.
The exchange 930a, which may be similar to the exchange 130 of
In operation, the exchange 930a may provide price data from the order book 932a to the price server 922a and order data and/or fill data from the matching engine 934a to the order server 924a. Servers 922a, 924a, 926a may translate and communicate this data back to the trading device 910a. The trading device 910a, for example, using a trading application, may process this data. For example, the data may be displayed to a user. In another example, the data may be utilized in a trading algorithm to determine whether a trade order should be submitted to the exchange 930a. The trading device 910a may prepare and send an order message to the exchange 930a.
In some embodiments, the exchange 930a may include one or more trading applications that distribute market data based on one or more price level transitions. For example, the exchange 930a may include a trading application that only transmits price data (e.g., via a price feed) in response to detection of one or more price level transitions. This may reduce the amount of price data that is sent to the price server 922a.
The exchange 930a may be owned, operated, controlled, or used by an exchange entity. Example exchange entities include the CME Group, the London International Financial Futures and Options Exchange, the Intercontinental Exchange, and Eurex. The exchange 930a may include an electronic matching system, such as a computer, server, or other computing device, which is adapted to allow tradeable objects, for example, offered for trading by the exchange, to be bought and sold. The exchange 930a may include separate entities, some of which list and/or administer tradeable objects and others which receive and match orders, for example. The exchange 930a may include an electronic communication network (“ECN”), for example.
The exchange 930a may be an electronic exchange. The exchange 930a is adapted to receive order messages and match contra-side trade orders to buy and sell tradeable objects. Unmatched trade orders may be listed for trading by the exchange 930a. The trade orders may include trade orders received from the trading device 110 or other devices in communication with the exchange 930a, for example. For example, typically the exchange 930a will be in communication with a variety of other trading devices (which may be similar to trading device 110) which also provide trade orders to be matched.
The exchange 930a is adapted to provide market data. Market data may be provided in one or more messages or data packets or through a shared memory system. For example, the exchange 930a may publish a data feed to subscribing devices, such as the trading device 110 or gateway 120. The data feed may include market data.
In certain embodiments, the gateway 920a is part of the trading device 910a. For example, the components of the gateway 920a may be part of the same computing platform as the trading device 910a. As another example, the functionality of the gateway 920a may be performed by components of the trading device 910a. In certain embodiments, the gateway 920a is not present. Such an arrangement may occur when the trading device 910a does not need to utilize the gateway 920a to communicate with the exchange 930a, for example. For example, if the trading device 910a has been adapted to communicate directly with the exchange 930a.
Additional trading devices 910b-910e, which are similar to trading device 910a, may be connected to one or more of the gateways 920a-920n and exchanges 930a-930n. Furthermore, additional gateways, similar to the gateway 920a, may be in communication with multiple exchanges, similar to the exchange 930a. Each gateway may be in communication with one or more different exchanges, for example. Such an arrangement may, for example, allow one or more trading devices 910a to trade at more than one exchange (and/or provide redundant connections to multiple exchanges).
The electronic trading system of
The computing device 1000 includes a communication network 1010, a processor 1012, a memory 1014, an interface 1016, an input device 1018, and an output device 1020. The computing device 1000 may include additional, different, or fewer components. For example, multiple communication networks, multiple processors, multiple memory, multiple interfaces, multiple input devices, multiple output devices, or any combination thereof, may be provided. As another example, the computing device 1000 may not include an input device 1018 or output device 1020.
As shown in
The processor 1012 may be any suitable processor, processing unit, or microprocessor. The processor 1012 may include one or more general processors, digital signal processors, application specific integrated circuits, field programmable gate arrays, analog circuits, digital circuits, programmed processors, and/or combinations thereof, for example. The processor 1012 may be a single device or a combination of devices, such as one or more devices associated with a network or distributed processing. Any processing strategy may be used, such as multi-processing, multi-tasking, parallel processing, and/or remote processing. Processing may be local or remote and may be moved from one processor to another processor. In certain embodiments, the computing device 1000 is a multi-processor system and, thus, may include one or more additional processors which are communicatively coupled to the communication network 1010.
The processor 1012 may be operable to execute logic and other computer readable instructions encoded in one or more tangible media, such as the memory 1014. As used herein, logic encoded in one or more tangible media includes instructions which may be executable by the processor 1012 or a different processor. The logic may be stored as part of software, hardware, integrated circuits, firmware, and/or micro-code, for example. The logic may be received from an external communication device via a communication network such as the network 1040. The processor 1012 may execute the logic to perform the functions, acts, or tasks illustrated in the figures or described herein.
The memory 1014 may be one or more tangible media, such as computer readable storage media, for example. Computer readable storage media may include various types of volatile and non-volatile storage media, including, for example, random access memory, read-only memory, programmable read-only memory, electrically programmable read-only memory, electrically erasable read-only memory, flash memory, any combination thereof, or any other tangible data storage device. As used herein, the term non-transitory or tangible computer readable medium is expressly defined to include any type of computer readable medium and to exclude propagating signals. The memory 1014 may include any desired type of mass storage device including hard disk drives, optical media, magnetic tape or disk, etc.
The memory 1014 may include one or more memory devices. For example, the memory 1014 may include local memory, a mass storage device, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, or a combination thereof. The memory 1014 may be adjacent to, part of, programmed with, networked with, and/or remote from processor 1012, so the data stored in the memory 1014 may be retrieved and processed by the processor 1012, for example. The memory 1014 may store instructions which are executable by the processor 1012. The instructions may be executed to perform one or more of the acts or functions described herein or shown in the figures. For example, the instructions may be executed by a processor, such as the processor 1012, to implement a method, such as all or a portion of the method 200 shown in
The memory 1014 may store a trading application 1030. In certain embodiments, the trading application 1030 may be accessed from or stored in different locations. The processor 1012 may access the trading application 1030 stored in the memory 1014 and execute computer-readable instructions included in the trading application 1030. By way of example, the memory 1014 may include instructions for receiving market data 1032, instructions for identifying one or more price level transitions 1034, and instructions for distributing market data based on the one or more price level transitions.
In certain embodiments, during an installation process, the trading application may be transferred from the input device 1018 and/or the network 1040 to the memory 1014. When the computing device 1000 is running or preparing to run the trading application 1030, the processor 1012 may retrieve the instructions from the memory 1014 via the communication network 1010.
Some of the described figures depict example block diagrams, systems, and/or flow diagrams representative of methods that may be used to implement all or part of certain embodiments. One or more of the components, elements, blocks, and/or functionality of the example block diagrams, systems, and/or flow diagrams may be implemented alone or in combination in hardware, firmware, discrete logic, as a set of computer readable instructions stored on a tangible computer readable medium, and/or any combinations thereof, for example.
The example block diagrams, systems, and/or flow diagrams may be implemented using any combination of application specific integrated circuit(s) (ASIC(s)), programmable logic device(s) (PLD(s)), field programmable logic device(s) (FPLD(s)), discrete logic, hardware, and/or firmware, for example. Also, some or all of the example methods may be implemented manually or in combination with the foregoing techniques, for example.
The example block diagrams, systems, and/or flow diagrams may be performed using one or more processors, controllers, and/or other processing devices, for example. For example, the examples may be implemented using coded instructions, for example, computer readable instructions, stored on a tangible computer readable medium. A tangible computer readable medium may include various types of volatile and non-volatile storage media, including, for example, random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), programmable read-only memory (PROM), electrically programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory, a hard disk drive, optical media, magnetic tape, a file server, any other tangible data storage device, or any combination thereof. The tangible computer readable medium is non-transitory.
Further, although the example block diagrams, systems, and/or flow diagrams are described above with reference to the figures, other implementations may be employed. For example, the order of execution of the components, elements, blocks, and/or functionality may be changed and/or some of the components, elements, blocks, and/or functionality described may be changed, eliminated, sub-divided, or combined. Additionally, any or all of the components, elements, blocks, and/or functionality may be performed sequentially and/or in parallel by, for example, separate processing threads, processors, devices, discrete logic, and/or circuits.
While embodiments have been disclosed, various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material. Therefore, it is intended that the disclosed technology not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/465,600 filed Sep. 2, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,636,543, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/709,769 filed Dec. 10, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,138,525, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3253263 | Lee et al. | May 1966 | A |
3962685 | Belle Isle | Jun 1976 | A |
4868866 | Williams, Jr. | Jun 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5339392 | Risberg et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5440564 | Ovadia et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5515359 | Zheng | May 1996 | A |
5588009 | Will | Dec 1996 | A |
5680116 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5758097 | Debe et al. | May 1998 | A |
5802310 | Rajaraman | Sep 1998 | A |
5809483 | Broka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5832496 | Anand et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5905868 | Baghai et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913202 | Motoyama | Jun 1999 | A |
5915209 | Lawrence | Jun 1999 | A |
5982771 | Caldara et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995943 | Bull et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995980 | Olson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006206 | Smith et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026406 | Huang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058389 | Chandra et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073180 | Onoda et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097399 | Bhatt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6278982 | Korhammer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6366899 | Kernz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370569 | Austin | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408000 | Lamberg et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6501950 | Smith et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516339 | Potts, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553035 | Schwartz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6675153 | Cook et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6772132 | Kemp, II | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6904596 | Clark et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6925493 | Barkan et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6938011 | Kemp, II et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6993507 | Meyer et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7127424 | Kemp, II et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133460 | Bae et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167923 | Lo | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7212997 | Pine et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7222096 | Anaya | May 2007 | B2 |
7228289 | Brumfield et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7272118 | Yarkosky | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7310615 | Lewis | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7389265 | Lawrence et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389268 | Kemp, II et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7412462 | Margolus et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426491 | Singer et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7462491 | Thompson | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7552077 | Schluetter | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7555485 | Soulanille | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567930 | Schluetter | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7586484 | Sampsell et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599867 | Monroe et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7606761 | Acki et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7627682 | Uthe | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7685049 | Singer | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7685052 | Waelbroeck et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685616 | Virdi et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7742962 | Singer | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7747510 | Burns et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7747513 | Duquette et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7873065 | Mukerji et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7945508 | Duquette | May 2011 | B2 |
7970697 | Schwarz | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8036977 | Mintz et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8041624 | Buckwalter et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8082573 | Miyamoto et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8090637 | Schluetter | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8229823 | Schluetter | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8290850 | Singer | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8301546 | Schwarz | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8352344 | Schluetter et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8407135 | Singer | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8423373 | Singer | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8571959 | Schluetter et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8589948 | Kemp, II | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606690 | Singer | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8762257 | Singer | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8799135 | Duquette | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9197428 | Lebedev | Nov 2015 | B1 |
10026122 | West | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10037570 | Duquette | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10055790 | Singer | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10248999 | Singer | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10453134 | Zhou | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10467691 | Singer | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10572941 | West | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10726486 | Singer | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10776871 | Singer | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10937095 | West | Mar 2021 | B2 |
11282141 | Singer | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20020026528 | Lo | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020097697 | Bae et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120546 | Zajac | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020161883 | Mantheny et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184237 | McFeely | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009550 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009553 | Benfield et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055768 | Anaya et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061069 | Silverman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065598 | Bunda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030126068 | Hauk et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040019554 | Merold | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040039733 | Soulanille | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040153533 | Lewis | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040162772 | Lewis | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040244045 | Miyamoto et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254877 | Buckwalter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027629 | De Breed et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044037 | Lawrence et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050177657 | Pope et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198437 | Mukherjee | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203825 | Angle et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060039293 | Uthe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047849 | Mukherjee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066503 | Sampsell et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069635 | Ram et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060200404 | Stearns | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060265309 | Sweeting et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287934 | Rowe | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005481 | Kedia et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070078700 | Lenzmann et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100733 | Huizing et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070208647 | Gemuenden et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080097887 | Duquette | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097893 | Walsky et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080162324 | West | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080232364 | Beverly | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090240633 | Schluetter et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100005022 | DePetris et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100100830 | Singer | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131398 | Molloy et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138335 | Kemp, II et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100228833 | Diqiette et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110184849 | Duquette et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110218904 | Schwarz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120072325 | Schluetter et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120259767 | Schluetter | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120317011 | Duquette | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130006841 | Singer | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130085923 | Schluetter | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130151395 | Singer | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130211997 | Singer | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212001 | Duquette | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140143119 | Singer | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164202 | Singer | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140236795 | Schluetter et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140316966 | Singer | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20180293652 | West | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180330441 | Singer | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190172135 | Singer | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200143472 | West | May 2020 | A1 |
20200311813 | Singer | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200364793 | Singer | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20210103986 | West | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007340076 | Dec 2007 | AU |
103400296 | Nov 2013 | CN |
1422641 | May 2004 | EP |
H06-004544 | Jan 1994 | JP |
H06-250947 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2010-527477 | Aug 2010 | JP |
199913426 | Mar 1999 | WO |
200209454 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2002017193 | Feb 2002 | WO |
2006012284 | Feb 2006 | WO |
2008140950 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2012145532 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
H. Subramoni, F. Petrini, V. Agarwal and D. Pasetto, “Streaming, low-latency communication in on-line trading systems,” 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum (IPDPSW), Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010, pp. 1-8. (Year: 2010). |
Berrada, T., “Incomplete Information, Heterogeneity, and Asset Pricing” [online], Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford: Winter 2006, vol. 4, Iss. 1, p. 136 (Abstract Only). [Retrieved on Jun. 21, 2012] from the Internet: http://proquest.umi.com/, ProQuest Document ID: 958859761. |
Bigrigg, “Survivable Information Storage Systems,” Computer (Aug. 2000). |
Buckley, Chris, “Implementation of the SMART Information Retrieval System,” Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, (May 1985). |
Canadian Application No. 2,671,394, Office Action dated Nov. 29, 2011 (4 pages). |
Canter, M.S., Ph.D., “Price Discovery in Futures Markets” [online], Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York: 1996, 134 Pages (Abstract only), AAT 9631673. [Retrieved on Jun. 21, 2012] from the Internet: http://proquest.umi.com/, ProQuest Document ID: 743048241. |
Chen, Ling and Chen, Gen-Cai. “Fuzzy DR Algorithm for Data Distribution Management,” Journal of Zhejiang University, Sep. 2006, pp. 1521-1525 (Abstract only). |
Chakravarty, et al., “Decimal Trading and Market Impact.” Mar. 26, 2001. |
Clemons & Weber, “Restructuring Institutional Block Trading: An Overview of the Opti-Mark System.” Journal of Management Information Systems. vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 41-60 (Fall 1998). |
European Application No. 07855266.8, Extended Search Report dated Dec. 2, 2010 (7 pages). |
European Application No. 07855266.8, Office Action dated Nov. 17, 2011 (4 pages). |
European Application No. 07855266.8, Official Communication dated Apr. 20, 2012 (3 pages). |
Fahringer, T., Buffer-Safe Communication Optimization based on Data Flow Analysis and Performance Prediction. Institute for Software Technology and Parallel Systems, University of Vienna Liechtensteinstr. 22, A-1090, Vienna, Austria {tf,mehofer} @par.univie.ac.at. (Year: 1997). |
Garcia, Albert B. “Estimating Computer Communication Network Performance Using Network Simulations,” The University of Dayton, UMI Dissertation Publishing, 1985 (Abstract). |
Hunter, J., “LAN Bridges Bridging the Gap” [online], Network World, vol. 6, No. 27, Jul. 10, 1989, ProQuest Central, p. 39. |
IBM, GEAC System 21, Concept and tasks associated with AS/400 system, http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg245967.pdf, pp. 3-15, Section 1.1; 2001. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2007/088143 dated Mar. 1, 2008 (dated Apr. 28, 2008) (10 pages). |
Johnson, T.D., Ph.D., “Connection Level Priority/Pre-Emption Service for Asynchronous Transfer Mode Communication Networks” [online], Ph.D. Dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (PQDT) , 1997, 422 pages. |
Lakshmanan, G.T., et al., “Placement Strategies for Internet-Scale Data Stream Systems,” in IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 50-60, Nov.-Dec. 2008. (Year: 2008). |
Lizy, J., Code Coalescing Unit: A Mechanism to Facilitate Load Store Data Communication. Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, the University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712, ljohn@ece.utexas.edu., (Year: 1998). |
Marshall, D. “Thread programming examples”, https://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/Dave.Marshall/C/node32.html; Jan. 5, 1999. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, 5th Ed., 2002, p. 518. |
Paul, et al. “Course 24: OpenGL and Window System Integration” Presented at Special Interest Group on Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), Los Angeles, Aug. 3-8, 1997. http://www.siggraph.org/s97/conference/courses/24.html. |
Preliminary Examination Instructions in view of the Supreme Court Decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International, et al. (signed Jun. 25, 2014). |
Raghavan, Gopalakrishna. “Industrial Strength Formalization of Object-Oriented Real Time Systems,” Florida Atlantic University, UMI Dissertation Publishing, 2000. |
Sable, et al., “Evolution to the Advanced Intelligent Network,” Evolution to the Advanced Intelligent Networks, AT & T, Apr. 5, 1992, pp. 103-113 (Document No. XP000684008). |
Sarin et al., “Using History Information to Process Delayed Database Updates,” Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Very Large Databases, Kyoto—Japan (Aug. 1986). |
Scarborough, B., “Distributed Database Gives More Data Independence and Sharing” [online], Computing Canada, Willowdale: May 30, 1985, vol. 11, Iss. 11, Pg. Software (Abstract only). [Retrieved on Jun. 21, 2012] from the Internet: http://proquest.umi.com/, ProQuest Document ID: 7066702. |
Shaikh, A., Traffic Characteristics of Bulk Data Transfer using TCP/IP over Gigabit Ethernet. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of South Florida Tampa, FL 33620 {ashaikh, christen) @csee.usf.edu. (Year: 2001). |
Singapore Application No. 11201504196Q, Written Opinion issued by Austrian Patent Office dated Mar. 3, 2016 (dated Apr. 1, 2016). |
Singapore Application No. 2009-04177-3, Written Opinion issued by Austrian Patent Office (dated Nov. 16, 2009) (4 pages). |
Singapore Application No. 2009-04177-3, Examination Report issued by Austrian Patent Office (dated Oct. 13, 2010) (4 pages). |
Taylor, P., “Second Quarter Sales Surge but Competition Depresses Margins” [online], Financial Times, London, United Kingdom, Jul. 28, 1998, p. 4. [Retrieved on Aug. 28, 2008] from the Internet: http://proquest.umi.com/, ProQuest Document ID: 32380156. |
Ye, J., Ph. D., “An Investigation of Market Fragmentation and the Specialist's Quotation Strategy,” [online], Ph.D. Dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (PQDT) , 1995, 110 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230237580 A1 | Jul 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17465600 | Sep 2021 | US |
Child | 18187066 | US | |
Parent | 13709769 | Dec 2012 | US |
Child | 17465600 | US |