Disturbance detecting current sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11041915
  • Patent Number
    11,041,915
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 18, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 22, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
A power distribution monitoring system is provided that can include a number of features. The system can include a plurality of monitoring devices configured to attach to individual conductors on a power grid distribution network. In some embodiments, a monitoring device includes a current sensing element comprising a Rogowski coil. The output of the Rogowski coil can be used by a fault detection circuit to determine if a fault or disturbance occurs on the conductor. Methods of using the monitoring devices are also provided.
Description
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.


FIELD

The present application relates generally to distribution line monitoring, sensor monitoring, and power harvesting.


BACKGROUND

The current flow in power distribution network conductors includes the desirable fundamental power frequency of 50/60 Hz (depending on the country), and numerous types of undesirable frequencies. Broadly speaking, some of these frequencies are multiples of the fundamental frequency and are known as harmonics, while other frequencies may be more random and could be indications of various problems such as arcing, voltage breakdowns, or animal/vegetation contact. These later group of frequencies could collectively be called disturbances.


Electric utility companies attempt to sense and monitor disturbances in order to identify problems on their network. As stated above, one primary attribute of disturbance frequencies is that they are not the predominant fundamental power frequency. It is common in the industry to monitor electric conductors with current sensors. In the large majority of the cases, the foremost interest is to measure the amplitude of the fundamental frequency as a measure of the bulk current being delivered. In other cases however, the output of a current sensor may be post-processed in order to separate the any disturbance signals from the fundamental signals. Because the current sensor has just one output, and the post-processor has one input, the types of post-processing is limited.


While some fully featured monitoring devices can be configured to monitor, among other things, current flow in the power line and current waveforms, conductor temperatures, ambient temperatures, vibration, wind speed, monitoring device system diagnostics, etc., these fully featured monitoring devices can be expensive and can be overkill for situations when only a bare-bones, low-power fault detection device is required.


SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE

This disclosure generally provides distribution line monitoring sensors that include a number of features. Particularly, described herein are distribution line monitoring sensors with Rogowski coil current sensing elements connected to an integrator circuit, which allows disturbances on the conductor to be clearly indicated on the output waveform.


A method of sensing a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network is provided, comprising inducing a voltage in a Rogowski coil of a line monitoring device to produce a raw output, inputting the raw output from the Rogowski coil into an integrator circuit of the line monitoring device to produce an integrated output, inputting the raw output from the Rogowski coil into an all-pass filter of the line monitoring device to produce a filtered output, subtracting the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output, and indicating that a fault or disturbance has occurred on the conductor if the fault detection output is a non-zero value.


In some examples, the method further comprises, prior to the inducing step, mounting the line monitoring device on the conductor.


In some embodiments, the raw output of the Rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.


In one embodiment, a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest. In another embodiment, a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.


In some embodiments, the subtracting step is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor. The fundamental frequency can be, for example, 60 Hz, 50 Hz.


A line monitoring device configured to detect a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network is also provided, comprising a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor, a Rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein a voltage is induced in the Rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor, a fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the Rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce an integrated output, an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce a filtered output, a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output, wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.


In some embodiments, the raw output of the Rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.


In one embodiment, a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest. In another embodiment, a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.


In some embodiments, the subtracting step is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor. The fundamental frequency can be, for example, 60 Hz, 50 Hz.


A fault detection system is further provided, comprising a conductor of a power distribution network, a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor, a Rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein the conductor is configured to induce a voltage in the Rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor, a fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the Rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce an integrated output, an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce a filtered output, a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output, wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:



FIG. 1A is a typical over-head three-phase power distribution system utilizing a cross-bar mounted on pole for mechanical positioning of the conductors. Alternate patterns of parallel conductor routing are sometimes used. Power distribution line monitoring devices (102,104,106) are attached to the power lines typically using a standard lineman's shotgun hotstick (106) for easy deployment with necessitating turning off power in the lines.



FIGS. 1B and 1C show a schematic representation of a monitoring sensor in the closed (1B) and open (1C) positions. The open position facilitates mounting the monitoring sensor on a power line. The sensor remains on the power line in the closed (1B) position.



FIG. 2A is a schematic drawing of a monitoring device configured to detect disturbances or faults on a conductor of a power grid distribution network.



FIG. 2B is a schematic drawing of the components of a monitoring device including a Rogowski coil and a fault detection circuit.



FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the frequency responses of both the integrator and the all-pass filter of the circuit of FIG. 2B.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart describing a method for detecting a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Power line monitoring devices and systems described herein are configured to measure the currents of power grid distribution networks. Referring to FIG. 1A, monitoring system 100 comprises monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 mounted to power lines or primary conductors 108, 110, and 112, respectively, of power distribution network 114. The power distribution network can be a three phase AC network, or alternatively, a single-phase network, for example. The power distribution network can be any type of network, such as a 60 Hz North American network, or alternatively, a 50 Hz network such as is found in Europe and Asia, for example. Power distribution networks, such as in the United States, typically operate at a medium voltage (e.g., 4 kV to 65 kV or higher) to reduce the energy lost during transmission over long distances. The monitoring devices can also be used on high voltage “transmission lines” that operate at voltages higher than 65 kV.


Monitoring devices 102, 104, and 106 can be mounted on each power line of a three-phase network, as shown. The monitoring devices can be mounted quickly and easily via a hot-stick 116, and can harvest energy from the power lines for operation without additional supplemental power (e.g., batteries or solar panels). Installation of a three monitoring device array can be placed and configured by a single linesman with a hot-stick and a bucket truck in less than 20 minutes.



FIG. 1B illustrates a monitoring device in a closed/clamped configuration, and FIG. 1C shows the monitoring device in an opened/installation configuration. It should be understood that the device is opened into the installation configuration during installation on power lines, then closed around the line in the clamped configuration prior to operation.


The monitoring devices of the present disclosure, at a fundamental level, include only the components required to detect faults or disturbances on the power distribution network via current measurement, and include power harvesting components that enable the monitoring devices to harvest enough energy from the conductors for operation. Thus, the monitoring devices of the present disclosure are well suited for applications in which only line fault detection and self-powered operation are required, therefore providing low-power, efficient, and inexpensive line monitoring devices for power distribution networks.



FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of a monitoring device 202 mounted on a primary conductor 208, illustrating the main schematic components of the device. The monitoring device 202 can include a current sensing element 203 configured to sense a current of the primary conductor 208, a power harvesting element 205 configured to harvest power from primary conductor 208, and a fault detection circuit 207 that is electrically connected to the current sensing element. The current sensing element can be, for example, a Rogowski coil mounted around the primary conductor 208 to induce a voltage in the Rogowski coil that is proportional to the rate of change of current in the conductor. The Rogowski coil produces an output 209 that is not directly proportional to the current level of the current in the primary conductor, but rather is proportional to the slew rate of the current in the primary conductor (dI/dT). This output 209 is the “raw” output from the Rogowski coil. The output 209 of the Rogowski coil is input into the fault detection circuit 208, which provides a fault indication output 211 that can be used to determine if there is a fault or disturbance on the primary conductor 208.



FIG. 2B is another schematic diagram showing the current sensing element, or Rogowski coil 203, connected to the fault detection circuit 207. As shown, in this embodiment the fault detection circuit can comprise comprises an integrator 213 and an all pass filter 215 in a parallel configuration. The fault detection circuit 207 can be positioned inside the monitoring device, as shown in FIG. 2A, or alternatively, can be externally mounted but still electrically connected to the Rogowski coil. As described above, the output 209 from the Rogowski coil is a raw output that is proportional to the slew rate of the current in the primary conductor (dI/dT). This output 209 can be presented to the fault detection circuit which comprises an integrator 213 and an all-pass filter 215 in parallel. The fault detection circuit of the present disclosure utilizes two signals to produce the fault indication output 211; the first signal is the integrator output 217, representing the true current signal on the conductor as measured by the Rogowski coil, and the other signal is the pre-integrated or raw signal, directly from the Rogowski coil, which is passed through the all-pass filter to provide a filtered output 219. The two signal paths are processed separately, and then summed (e.g., subtracted, or summed with one of the inputs made negative) with a summation circuit 221 to create one final fault detection output 211, as shown in FIG. 2B. Any techniques or circuits for summing (subtracting) the outputs of the integrator circuit and the all-pass filter can be used, as known in the art.


The integrator path in the fault detection circuit 207 can have an ideal 90° phase shift over the frequency band of interest, and a sloping frequency response of approximately −20 dB per decade where the point of intercept of the fundamental frequency defines the gain (or attenuation) at the fundamental power frequency. The all-pass filter is configured to pass all frequencies equally in gain but change the phase relationship of the signal among various frequencies. The all-pass filter signal path of FIG. 2B can have complementary attributes to the integrator path, namely, a sloping phase shift response, where 90° of shift intercepts the fundamental power frequency, and a constant frequency response where the gain (or attenuation) is constant over the frequency band of interest.



FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate the frequency responses of both the integrator and the all-pass filter, respectively, of the circuit of FIG. 2B. It is noteworthy that although the two signal paths have altogether different characteristics, a pure sine wave, at the fundamental frequency (such as at 60 Hz for a power distribution network) the two signal paths have identical outputs. In the example above, they each have 10 dB of gain and a 90° phase shift at the fundamental frequency. Subtracting these two signals results in a null or zero output, again at the fundamental frequency. Thus, the fault detection circuit can be configured to indicate or detect disturbances or faults on the primary conductor when the output of the fault detection circuit is non-zero, as this output waveform that represents the amplitude and phase differences between the disturbance and the fundamental frequency.


In a traditionally used Rogowski coil, the “raw” output of the sensor coil is not accessible in many cases, it is only an internal connection and of no value. The novelty of the present disclosure is that the fault detection circuit is able to “reach inside” the Rogowski coil and connect a different type of filter to the raw Rogowski coil. Then by subtracting these two outputs, the resulting signal shows only the signals that are non-fundamental. These two filters respond to gain and phase in differing manners. But the circuit can be configured such that their outputs look identical at the fundamental frequency (e.g., 60 Hz). So with a pure 60 Hz current wave, the outputs from the integrator and all-pass filter subtract to zero. All other frequencies (e.g., disturbances) will have mis-matched outputs between the two filters, and therefore are exposed in the combined output. Thus, the output of the fault detection circuit in the present disclosure can be used to detect disturbances or faults in the primary conductor. When the output of the fault detection circuit is zero at the fundamental frequency, then there is not a fault or disturbance present on the primary conductor. However, if the output of the fault detection circuit is non-zero, then it can be an indication that a fault or disturbance is present on the primary conductor.


In some embodiments, this circuit can be implemented in ultra low-power analog circuitry. Because this circuit's output, in the absence of a disturbance, normally rests at a near zero level, the output can be monitored, for example, with a voltage comparator, and a trip threshold can be created in the monitoring device to indicate a disturbance is occurring.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart that describes a method for detecting a disturbance or fault on a conductor line of a power distribution network. At an operation 402 of the flowchart, a voltage can be induced in a Rogowski coil of a line monitoring device. As described above, the line monitoring device, and Rogowski coil, can be mounted to a conductor of a power distribution system. The voltage induced in the Rogowski coil can produce a raw output that is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.


At an operation 404 of the flowchart, the raw output from the Rogowski coil can be input into an integrator circuit of the line monitoring device to produce an integrated output. This integrated output represents the true current signal on the conductor as measured by the Rogowski coil. Next, at an operation 406 of the flowchart, the raw output from the Rogowski coil can also be input into an all-pass filter of the line monitoring device to produce a filtered output. The all-pass filter of operation 406 is designed and configured to have complementary attributes to the integrated output, namely a sloping phase shift response and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.


At an operation 408 of the flowchart, the integrated output of the integrator circuit can be summed/subtracted from the filtered output of the all-pass filter. As described above, the all-pass filter is designed to be complimentary to the integrator, such that at the fundamental frequency (or operating frequency of the conductor) the sum of the integrated output and the filtered output will be zero during normal operating conditions. Again, referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, the frequency response of the integrator has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over the frequency band of interest. The all-pass filter, however, has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at the fundamental frequency, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest. At the fundamental frequency, the gain and phase shift of the two outputs are identical in normal operating conditions. Thus, subtracting these two outputs results in a zero output at the fundamental frequency during normal operating conditions. However, during fault or disturbance conditions, the two outputs sum out to a non-zero value. Thus, at operation 410, a non-zero fault detection output is indicative of a fault or disturbance on the conductor. This fault detection output can be transmitted or communicated from the line monitoring device in the event of a fault or disturbance (e.g., communicated wirelessly or by wire).


As for additional details pertinent to the present invention, materials and manufacturing techniques may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.

Claims
  • 1. A method of sensing a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network, comprising: inducing a voltage in a Rogowski coil of a line monitoring device to produce a raw output;inputting the raw output from the Rogowski coil into an integrator circuit of the line monitoring device to produce an integrated output;inputting the raw output from the Rogowski coil into an all-pass filter of the line monitoring device to produce a filtered output;subtracting the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output; andindicating that a fault or disturbance has occurred on the conductor if the fault detection output is a non-zero value.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising, prior to the inducing step, mounting the line monitoring device on the conductor.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the raw output of the Rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the subtracting step is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the fundamental frequency is 60 Hz.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the fundamental frequency is 50 Hz.
  • 9. A line monitoring device configured to detect a fault or disturbance on a conductor of a power distribution network, comprising: a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor;a Rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein a voltage is induced in the Rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor; anda fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the Rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises:an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce an integrated output;an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce a filtered output;a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output;wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.
  • 10. The device of claim 9, wherein the raw output of the Rogowski coil is proportional to a rate of change of current in the conductor.
  • 11. The device of claim 9, wherein a frequency response of the integrator circuit has a sloping gain and a constant phase shift of 90° over a frequency band of interest.
  • 12. The device of claim 11, wherein a frequency response of the all-pass filter has a sloping phase shift, with a phase shift of 90° at a fundamental frequency of the conductor, and a constant gain over the frequency band of interest.
  • 13. The device of claim 9, wherein subtracting is performed at a fundamental frequency of the conductor.
  • 14. The device of claim 13, wherein the fundamental frequency is 60 Hz.
  • 15. The device of claim 13, wherein the fundamental frequency is 50 Hz.
  • 16. A fault detection system, comprising: a conductor of a power distribution network;a housing configured to be mounted to the conductor;a Rogowski coil disposed on or within the housing, wherein the conductor is configured to induce a voltage in the Rogowski coil to produce a raw output when current flows through the conductor; anda fault detection circuit disposed within the housing and being electrically coupled to the Rogowski coil, wherein the fault detection circuit comprises:an integrator circuit configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce an integrated output;an all-pass filter configured to receive the raw output from the Rogowski coil and produce a filtered output;a summation circuit configured to subtract the integrated output from the filtered output to produce a fault detection output;wherein the fault detection output indicates a fault or disturbance on the conductor if the fault detection output has a non-zero value.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/732,789, filed Sep. 18, 2018, titled “Disturbance Detecting Current Sensor”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (176)
Number Name Date Kind
3075166 Peek Jan 1963 A
3558984 Smith et al. Jan 1971 A
3676740 Schweitzer, Jr. Jul 1972 A
3686531 Decker et al. Aug 1972 A
3702966 Schweitzer, Jr. Nov 1972 A
3708724 Schweitzer, Jr. Jan 1973 A
3715742 Schweitzer, Jr. Feb 1973 A
3720872 Russell et al. Mar 1973 A
3725832 Schweitzer, Jr. Apr 1973 A
3755714 Link Aug 1973 A
3768011 Swain Oct 1973 A
3777217 Groce et al. Dec 1973 A
3814831 Olsen Jun 1974 A
3816816 Schweitzer, Jr. Jun 1974 A
3866197 Schweitzer, Jr. Feb 1975 A
3876911 Schweitzer, Jr. Apr 1975 A
3957329 McConnell May 1976 A
3970898 Baumann et al. Jul 1976 A
4063161 Pardis Dec 1977 A
4152643 Schweitzer, Jr. May 1979 A
4339792 Yasumura et al. Jul 1982 A
4378525 Burdick Mar 1983 A
4396794 Stiller Aug 1983 A
4396968 Stiller Aug 1983 A
4398057 Shankle et al. Aug 1983 A
4408155 McBride Oct 1983 A
4466071 Russell, Jr. Aug 1984 A
4559491 Saha Dec 1985 A
4570231 Bunch Feb 1986 A
4584523 Elabd Apr 1986 A
4649457 Talbot et al. Mar 1987 A
4654573 Rough et al. Mar 1987 A
4709339 Fernandes Nov 1987 A
4714893 Smith Vaniz et al. Dec 1987 A
4723220 Smith Vaniz Feb 1988 A
4728887 Davis Mar 1988 A
4746241 Burbank May 1988 A
4766549 Schweitzer, III et al. Aug 1988 A
4775839 Kosina et al. Oct 1988 A
4808916 Smith Vaniz Feb 1989 A
4829298 Fernandes May 1989 A
4881028 Bright Nov 1989 A
4886980 Fernandes et al. Dec 1989 A
4904932 Schweitzer, Jr. Feb 1990 A
4937769 Verbanets Jun 1990 A
5006846 Granville et al. Apr 1991 A
5125738 Kawamura et al. Jun 1992 A
5138265 Kawamura et al. Aug 1992 A
5159561 Watanabe et al. Oct 1992 A
5181026 Granville Jan 1993 A
5182547 Griffith Jan 1993 A
5202812 Shinoda et al. Apr 1993 A
5206595 Wiggins et al. Apr 1993 A
5220311 Schweitzer, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5428549 Chen Jun 1995 A
5438256 Thuries et al. Aug 1995 A
5473244 Libove et al. Dec 1995 A
5495169 Smith Feb 1996 A
5550476 Lau et al. Aug 1996 A
5565783 Lau et al. Oct 1996 A
5600248 Westrom et al. Feb 1997 A
5608328 Sanderson Mar 1997 A
5650728 Rhein et al. Jul 1997 A
5656931 Lau et al. Aug 1997 A
5682100 Rossi et al. Oct 1997 A
5696788 Choi et al. Dec 1997 A
5712796 Ohura et al. Jan 1998 A
5729144 Cummins Mar 1998 A
5737203 Barrett Apr 1998 A
5764065 Richards et al. Jun 1998 A
5839093 Novosel et al. Nov 1998 A
5892430 Wiesman et al. Apr 1999 A
5905646 Crewson et al. May 1999 A
5990674 Schweitzer, Jr. Nov 1999 A
6002260 Lau et al. Dec 1999 A
6016105 Schweitzer, Jr. Jan 2000 A
6043433 Schweitzer, Jr. Mar 2000 A
6133723 Feight Oct 2000 A
6133724 Schweitzer, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6288632 Hoctor et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292340 O'Regan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6347027 Nelson et al. Feb 2002 B1
6433698 Schweitzer, Jr. et al. Aug 2002 B1
6459998 Hoffman Oct 2002 B1
6466030 Hu et al. Oct 2002 B2
6466031 Hu et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477475 Takaoka et al. Nov 2002 B1
6483435 Saha et al. Nov 2002 B2
6549880 Willoughby et al. Apr 2003 B1
6559651 Crick May 2003 B1
6566854 Hagmann et al. May 2003 B1
6577108 Hubert et al. Jun 2003 B2
6601001 Moore Jul 2003 B1
6622285 Rust et al. Sep 2003 B1
6677743 Coolidge et al. Jan 2004 B1
6718271 Tobin Apr 2004 B1
6734662 Fenske May 2004 B1
6798211 Rockwell et al. Sep 2004 B1
6822457 Borchert et al. Nov 2004 B2
6822576 Feight et al. Nov 2004 B1
6879917 Turner Apr 2005 B2
6894478 Fenske May 2005 B1
6914763 Reedy Jul 2005 B2
6917888 Logvinov et al. Jul 2005 B2
6927672 Zalitsky et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949921 Feight et al. Sep 2005 B1
6963197 Feight et al. Nov 2005 B1
6980090 Mollenkopf Dec 2005 B2
7023691 Feight et al. Apr 2006 B1
7046124 Cope et al. May 2006 B2
7053601 Fenske et al. May 2006 B1
7072163 McCollough, Jr. Jul 2006 B2
7076378 Huebner Jul 2006 B1
7085659 Peterson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7106048 Feight et al. Sep 2006 B1
7158012 Wiesman et al. Jan 2007 B2
7187275 McCollough, Jr. Mar 2007 B2
7203622 Pan et al. Apr 2007 B2
7272516 Wang et al. Sep 2007 B2
7295133 McCollough, Jr. Nov 2007 B1
7400150 Cannon Jul 2008 B2
7424400 McCormack et al. Sep 2008 B2
7449991 Mollenkopf Nov 2008 B2
7450000 Gidge et al. Nov 2008 B2
7508638 Hooper Mar 2009 B2
7518529 O'Sullivan et al. Apr 2009 B2
7532012 Cern May 2009 B2
7557563 Gunn et al. Jul 2009 B2
7626794 Swartzendruber et al. Dec 2009 B2
7633262 Lindsey et al. Dec 2009 B2
7672812 Stoupis et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683798 Rostron Mar 2010 B2
7701356 Curt et al. Apr 2010 B2
7714592 Radtke et al. May 2010 B2
7720619 Hou May 2010 B2
7725295 Stoupis et al. May 2010 B2
7742393 Bonicatto et al. Jun 2010 B2
7764943 Radtke Jul 2010 B2
7795877 Radtke et al. Sep 2010 B2
7795994 Radtke Sep 2010 B2
7804280 Deaver, Sr. et al. Sep 2010 B2
7930141 Banting Apr 2011 B2
8421444 Gunn Apr 2013 B2
8497781 Engelhardt et al. Jul 2013 B2
8594956 Banting et al. Nov 2013 B2
8786292 Parsons Jul 2014 B2
9182429 Saxby et al. Nov 2015 B2
9229036 Kast et al. Jan 2016 B2
9448257 Saxby et al. Sep 2016 B2
9581624 Rostron et al. Feb 2017 B2
9933463 Danesh Apr 2018 B2
9954354 Baker et al. Apr 2018 B2
9984818 Rumrill May 2018 B2
20040156154 Lazarovich et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050073200 Divan et al. Apr 2005 A1
20080077336 Fernandes Mar 2008 A1
20090058582 Webb Mar 2009 A1
20090171602 Hong Jul 2009 A1
20090309754 Bou et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100085036 Banting et al. Apr 2010 A1
20110032739 Juhlin Feb 2011 A1
20120039062 McBee et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120236611 Alexandrov et al. Sep 2012 A1
20130162136 Baldwin et al. Jun 2013 A1
20140062221 Papastergiou et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140145858 Miller et al. May 2014 A1
20140174170 Davis Jun 2014 A1
20140192458 Valdes Jul 2014 A1
20140226366 Morokuma et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140253140 Gilbert Sep 2014 A1
20140260598 Miller Sep 2014 A1
20150198667 Krekeler Jul 2015 A1
20160116505 Kast et al. Apr 2016 A1
20170199533 McCollough Jul 2017 A1
20180143234 Saxby May 2018 A1
20190339319 Jakupi Nov 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
1508146 Feb 2005 EP
1938159 Jul 2008 EP
2340592 Jul 2011 EP
2350764 Aug 2011 EP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
Chen et al.; Development of arc-guided protection devices against lightning breakage of covered conductors on distribution lines; IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.; 25(1); pp. 196-205; Jan. 2010.
Chen Yang Technologies; Split core hall effect dc current sensor CYHCT-C2TC; 4 pages; retrieved from the internet Jan. 5, 2015 (http://www.hallsensors.de/CYHCT-C2TC.pdf) (Product Information).
Saha et al.; Fault Location on Power Networks (Power Systems); Springer Verlag; London, UK; 435 pgs.; 2010 (Preface: Oct. 2009).
Shepard et al.; An overview of rogowski coil current sensing technology; 13 pages; retrieved from the internet Jan. 5, 2016 (http://www.dynamp.net/ldadocum.nsf/c2270fbdd892ac3e86256e75000ad88a/e710af6d3e0f6255862565d7004b19db/$FILE/Report.pdf).
Stringfield et al.; Fault location methods for overhead lines; in Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers; Amer. Inst. of Electrical Eng.; New York, NY; Part. III; vol. 76; pp. 518-530; Aug. 1957.
Rumrill; U.S. Appl. No. 16/574,465 entitled “Systems and methods to measure primary voltage using capacitive coupled test point and grounded sensor circuit,” filed 9/18/201.
Rumrill; U.S. Appl. No. 16/575,220 entitled “Systems and methods to maximize power from multiple power line energy harvesting devices,” filed Sep. 18, 2019.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200088779 A1 Mar 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62732789 Sep 2018 US