Diurethanes

The present invention relates to new and valuable diurethanes having an excellent herbicidal action, herbicides containing these compounds, and processes for controlling the growth of unwanted plants with these compounds.
It is known to use 3-isopropyl-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin(4)-one-2,2-dioxide for the selective control of unwanted broadleaved weeds (German 1,542,836).
A further compound of importance in agriculture is ethyl-N-(3-N'-phenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl carbamate (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,567,151). The only crop in which this active ingredient is used is beet (Beta).
Diurethanes having a herbicidal action and containing a phenyl radical substituted by a fluorine atom or 2 chlorine atoms, e.g., ethyl-N-(3-N'-(4'-fluorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl carbamate (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,567,151, German Published Application DAS 1,568,138), are known.
We have now found that 3-(N'-halofluorophenylcarbamoyloxyphenyl)-carbamates of the formula ##STR2## where R denotes lower alkyl (methyl, ethyl), and X/Y denote the combination fluorine/fluorine, fluorine/chlorine or chlorine/fluorine, have an excellent action on numerous important unwanted plants, and are tolerated well by crop plants, e.g., soybeans (Glycine max.). The new active ingredients are also tolerated excellently by other crop plants, e.g., ground nuts, beet and certain vegetable varieties, and acceptably by rice; consequently, these compounds may be employed in numerous crops, either individually or in combination with other herbicidal substances.
The new compounds may for instance be prepared by the following methods:
A) Reaction of N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-urethanes (prepared in turn by conventional methods from m-aminophenol (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,643,763) or 3-hydroxyphenyl isocyanate (British 1,153,261)) with halofluorophenyl isocyanates in the presence of a catalyst conventionally used for isocyanate reactions, e.g., tertiary amines (triethylamine, 1,4-diazabicyclo-(2,2,2)-octane), nitrogen-containing heterocycles (pyridine, 1,2-dimethylimidazole) and organic tin compounds (dibutyltin diacetate, dimethyltin dichloride), in the presence or absence of a solvent inert under the reaction conditions, e.g., hydrocarbons (ligroin, benzene, toluene, pentane, cyclohexane), halohydrocarbons (methylene chloride, dichloroethane, chlorobenzene), nitrohydrocarbons (nitrobenzene, nitromethane), nitriles (acetonitrile, butyronitrile, benzonitrile), ethers (diethyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, dioxane), esters (ethyl acetate, methyl propionate), ketones (acetone, methyl ethyl ketone) and amides (dimethylformamide, formamide) (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,568,138) at temperatures of from 0.degree. to 150.degree. C., preferably from 40.degree. to 100.degree. C.
b) Reaction of N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-urethanes or their alkali metal salts with halofluorophenylcarbamic acid chlorides (prepared by addition of hydrogen chloride to the appropriate isocyanates in accordance with Houben-Weyl, Methoden der organischen Chemie, VIII, 130, Georg Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart, 4th ed., 1952), in the presence or absence of an acid binder, e.g., alkali metal hydroxides, alkali metal carbonates, alkali metal bicarbonates, alkaline earth metal oxides, alkaline earth metal hydroxides, alkaline earth metal carbonates, alkaline earth metal bicarbonates, and tertiary organic bases (e.g., triethylamine, pyridine, N,N-dimethylamine) in a solvent, e.g., water, alcohols (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol) or as listed under a) (German Laid-Open Applications DOS 1,568,138 and 1,568,621).
c) Reaction of m-nitrophenol with halofluorophenyl isocyanates (equivalent to method a)) or with halofluorophenylcarbamic acid chlorides (equivalent to method b)), subsequent reduction of the nitro group by known methods, e.g., hydrogenation, catalyzed by a noble metal such as platinum, palladium or Raney nickel, in a solvent as given under b), with the exception of nitrohydrocarbons and certain halohydrocarbons, followed by reaction with chlorocarbonic acid esters in the presence of an inorganic or organic base in a solvent (as under b)) (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,568,621).
d) Reaction of N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-urethanes with phosgene, advantageously in a solvent inert under the reaction conditions (as under a)) -- if desired, with the addition of acid binders (as under b)) -- to give the corresponding chlorocarbonic acid ester, which is then reacted with a halofluoroaniline analogously to method b) to give the desired end product (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,593,523). Method a) is preferred.
The manufacture of the new diurethanes is illustrated by the following examples.

EXAMPLE 1
Ethyl-N-(3-(N'-3,4-difluorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate (No. 1)
18.1 g (0.1 mole) of ethyl-N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-carbamate and 0.5 g of triethylamine in 150 ml of dry toluene are heated at 70.degree.-80.degree. C. 15.5 g (0.1 mole) of 3,4-difluorophenyl isocyanate is slowly dripped in and the mixture stirred for 3 hours at 100.degree. C. After having been allowed to cool, the mixture is suction filtered and the residue recrystallized from ethyl acetate/petroleum ether. Yield: 22.0 g (66%); m.p.: 127.degree.-130.degree. C.
EXAMPLE 2
Methyl-N-(3-(N'-3-chloro-4-fluorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate (No. 9)
8.6 parts by weight of 3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl isocyanate is added to a solution of 8.4 parts of N-(3'-hydroxyphenyl)-methylcarbamate in 100 parts of tetrahydrofuran and one drop of dibutyltin diacetate.
After the mixture has stood for 20 hours it is concentrated, 80 parts of toluene is added to the residue, and the resultant mixture suction filtered. After drying, there is obtained 16.2 parts by weight of white crystals having a melting point of from 175.degree.-177.degree. C.
The following new diurethanes may be prepared analogously:
2. ethyl-N-(3-(N'-3-chloro-4-fluorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate, m.p. 133.degree.-134.degree. C.
3. ethyl-N-(3-(N'-3-fluoro-4-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate, m.p. 155.degree.-158.degree. C.
8. methyl-N-(3-(N'-3,4-difluorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate, m.p. 161.degree.-163.degree. C.
9. methyl-N-(3-(N'-3-chloro-4-fluorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate, m.p. 175.degree.-177.degree. C.
10. methyl-N-(3-(N'-3-fluoro-4-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate, m.p. 170.degree.-173.degree. C.
Preparation of the starting compounds
Recipe A
3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl isocyanate
At -10.degree. to 0.degree. C. and while stirring, a solution of 156 parts by weight of 3-chloro-4-fluoroaniline (J. Chem. Soc., 1928, 423) is metered into a solution of 250 parts by weight of phosgene in 1,000 parts by weight of toluene. The mixture is slowly heated to 110.degree. C. (internal temperature), at which temperature it becomes clear.
The solvent is then distilled off at subatmospheric pressure. The crude isocyanate which remains is purified by vacuum distillation; b.p. (33 mm Hg): 108.degree.-112.degree. C.
The compound has the following structural formula: ##STR3## Analogously, phosgenation of 3-fluoro-4-chloroaniline (J. Chem. Soc., 1928, 423) gives a solid crude isocyanate which is purified by crystallization; m.p.: 39.degree.-42.degree. C.
The compound has the following structural formula: ##STR4##
Recipe B
3,4-difluorophenyl isocyanate
At -10.degree. to 0.degree. and while stirring, 120 g of 3,4-difluoroaniline (J. Chem. Soc., 73, 5884-5, 1951) is metered into a solution of 180 parts by weight of phosgene in 1,100 parts by weight of chloronaphthalene. The reaction mixture is then slowly heated to 150.degree. C. while passing in additional phosgene, and phosgenated for 2 hours at this temperature. Excess phosgene is expelled with nitrogen and the isocyanate distilled from the solution; b.p. (30 mm Hg): 79.degree.-85.degree. C.
The compound has the following structural formula: ##STR5##
Experiments demonstrating the herbicidal action of the new diurethanes (biscarbamates)
The experiments which follow demonstrate the special nature of the active ingredients of the invention compared with chemically similar prior art compounds. The compounds used for comparison purposes were herbicidal diurethanes (compounds nos. 4, 5 and 7) and the closest commercial standard product from this class of compounds (no. 6). Compounds 11, 12, 13 and 14 have the following formulae:
__________________________________________________________________________11 ##STR6## prior art (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,567,151)12 ##STR7## prior art (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,567,151)13 ##STR8## prior art (Belgian 700,942) (German Published Application DAS 1,568,138)14 ##STR9## prior art (German Laid-Open Application DOS 1,567,151)__________________________________________________________________________
The series of experiments were carried out in the greenhouse and in the open.
I. Greenhouse experiments
Paraffined paper cups having a volume of 200 cm.sup.3 were filled with a sandy loam containing 1.5% humus, in which the test plants, separated by species, were sown (Table 1). As all the treatments were postemergence (leaf) treatments, the plants were grown to the desired size and growth stages. As a rule, the plants were treated when they had developed from 1 to 5 genuine leaves (in a few cases more). The agents were applied in water as distribution medium, with the aid of fine atomizing nozzles. Depending on the temperature requirements of the test plants, the experiments were carried out either in the cooler (15.degree.-26.degree. C.) or warmer (25.degree.-40.degree. C.) part of the greenhouse. The experimental period was from 2 to 4 weeks, during which the plants were regularly tended and their reaction to the various treatments was assessed. The tables below contain the substances investigated and the application rates in kg/ha of active ingredient. The scale for assessment was 0 to 100, 0 denoting no damage and 100 complete destruction.
II. Experiments in the open
The substances were applied to plots. The spray employed was a motor-driven plot spray mounted on a hitch. The active ingredients were emulsified in water as the distribution medium. Spraying took place after emergence of the plants and at various growth stages. The crop plants (Tables 7 and 8) were sown in rows. For the most part, weed growth was natural, but weed seeds were additionally scattered to increase the stand. The soil in the individual experiments was a sandy loam having a pH of 5 to 6 and containing 1 to 2% humus. All the experiments were run for several weeks. The action of the active ingredients on the crop and unwanted plants was recorded on the 0 to 100 scale.
Results
The comparative agent ethyl-N-(3-(N'-3,4-dichlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate (compound no. 7) fell generally behind because of its middling to poor herbicidal action. The new compound no. 1 and active ingredient no. 2 according to the invention were clearly superior (Tables 3 and 7).
The same inferiority also applies to the monofluoro-substituted compound no. 4 employed for comparison purposes (Tables 2 and 7).
Comparative compound no. 5 was more active than the two abovementioned comparative agents, and embraced the weed spectrum controlled by the compounds of the invention, but the action per unit of active ingredient was less than that of new compound no. 1. This weakness was particularly evident in weeds such as Stellaria media, Sinapis species, Raphanus species and Veronica species which are important in Central European beet crops. Of importance for warmer regions is the superiority of the new compound in unwanted species such as Desmodium, Euphorbia and Solanum, to which reference was made above.
In view of the poor action of the comparative agents which are, due to their substitution, closest to the compounds of the invention, their more or less pronounced tolerance by crop plants is meaningless (Tables 4, 5 and 6).
The comparison with the unsubstituted compound no. 6 was therefore the only one of interest. Its herbicidal action was equivalent to that of the new compounds. Certain weaknesses in some species were on average cancelled out by its superiority in Datura stramonium (Tables 2 and 7).
However, the greenhouse experiments with various varieties of soybeans showed that the new compound no. 1 caused much less damage to the leaves than comparative agent no. 6 (Tables 4 and 5). Even known soybean herbicides cause damage to some species. As an example, 3-isopropyl-2,1,3-benzothiadiazinone-(4)-2,2-dioxide was investigated (Table 5). In these greenhouse experiments, compound no. 1 (according to the invention) was acceptable, whereas comparative agent no. 6 was not, on account of its much greater phytotoxicity.
With regard to tolerance by crop plants, sugar beet and rice tolerated compound no. 2 better than comparative agent no. 6 (Table 6).
The phytotoxicity of comparative agent no. 6 was pointed out in the introduction, and was clearly evident here. By contrast, the beets treated with new compound no. 1 showed hardly any effects of the herbicide (Tables 6, 7 and 8), a sign of its superior selectivity in this crop.
With reference to Tables 9 and 10, all the compounds investigated had a herbicidal action. However, if these results are scrutinized more closely, it will be seen that the new compounds are superior to the prior art compounds in a number of individual comparisons, either because of their superior herbicidal action or because they are better tolerated by crop plants. That this is so is unexpected and surprising, and is a special feature of the compounds according to the invention.
Table 1__________________________________________________________________________List of plant namesBotanical name Abbreviation in tables Common name__________________________________________________________________________Amaranthus retroflexus Amar. retr. pigweedAnthemis spp. Anth. chamomileArachis hypogaea Arach. hyp. peanutsBeta vulgaris spp. alt. Beta vulg. sugarbeetsBrassica napus -- rapeChenopodium album Chenop. album lambsquartersChrysanthemum segetum Saatwucherblume corn marigoldDatura stramonium Datura str. JimsonweedDesmodium tortuosum Desm. tort. Florida beggarweedEuphorbia geniculata Euph. gen. South American member of the spurge familyGalinsoga spp. Galin. spp. --Glycine max -- soybeansGosspyium hirsutum Gossp. hirs. cottonHelianthus annuus sunflowersIpomoea spp. morningglory (annual)Lamium amplexicaule henbitMatricaria chamomilla Matric. cham. wild chamomileMatricaria spp. Matr. chamomileMedicago sativa Medic. sat. alfalfaMercurialis annua Mercur. annua annual mercuryOryza sativa Oryza sat. ricePhaseolus vulgaris Phaseol. vulg. snapbeansPolygonum aviculare prostrate knotweedPolygonum convolvulus Polyg. conv. wild buckwheatRaphanus raphanistrum Raph. wild radishSesbania exaltata Sesb. exalt. hemp sesbania (coffeeweed)Setaria viridis Set. virid. green foxtailSinapis alba white mustardSinapis arvensis Sinap. wild mustardSolanum nigrum Solan. nigrum black nightshadeSorghum bicolor Sorgh. bic. wild caneSpergula arvensis Sper. arv. corn spurryStellaria media Stell. med. chickweedVeronica spp. Veron. spp. speedwellXanthium pennsylvanicum Xanth. penns. common cockleburThlaspi arvense field pennycressTriticum aestivum wheat__________________________________________________________________________
Table 2__________________________________________________________________________Herbicidal action of ethyl-N-(3-N'-(3', 4'-difluorophenyl)-carbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate; postemergence treatment in the greenhouse ##STR10##Substituents Appl. Unwanted plants and % destruction Compound rate Amar. Datura Desm. Euph. Matric. Mercur. Sesb. Solan. Veron. Set.X Y no. kg/ha retr. str. tort. gen. cham. annua exalt. nigrum spp. virid.__________________________________________________________________________F F 1 0.5 97 -- 87 48 95 50 50 90 70 65 1.0 97 50 97 70 95 60 63 95 90 75F H 4 0.5 17 -- 20 35 70 25 32 0 0 40 prior art 1.0 30 50 20 45 75 82 50 35 10 40H F 5 0.5 83 -- 67 10 70 82 25 -- 25 50 prior art 1.0 95 100 97 40 90 82 40 75 78 60H H 6 0.5 97 -- 78 65 95 72 58 90 90 68 prior art 1.0 97 100 97 65 100 72 60 95 90 90__________________________________________________________________________ 0 = no action 100 = complete destruction
Table 3__________________________________________________________________________Further comparison of a chemically similar diurethane withethyl-N-(3-N'-(3', 4'-di-fluorophenyl)-carbamoyloxy)-phenyl)-carbamate; postemergence treatment inthe greenhouse ##STR11##Substituents Appl. Unwanted plants and % destruction Compound rate Amar. Desmod. Euphorb. Sesb. Setaria Xanth.X Y no. kg/ha retro. tort. genic. exalt. virid. penns.__________________________________________________________________________F F 1 0.5 95 85 70 60 65 -- 1.0 95 95 100 78 75 80C1 C1 7 0.5 48 30 0 50 32 -- prior art 1.0 68 35 0 65 58 90__________________________________________________________________________ 0 = no action 100 = complete destruction
Table 4__________________________________________________________________________Tolerance of various soybean varieties to herbicidal diurethanes; leaftreatmentin the greenhouse Appl.Compound rate Soybean variety and % damage Average forno. kg/ha SRF 450 Tracy Lee 68 Forrest Bragg Dare all varieties__________________________________________________________________________ 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 10 10 40 20 25 18 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 0 0 0 10 20 5 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.0 0 10 10 10 20 25 12 0.5 10 10 0 10 10 20 106 1.0 10 10 0 20 10 20 12 4.0 10 10 30 20 25 30 21__________________________________________________________________________ 0 = no damage 100 = plants destroyed
Table 5__________________________________________________________________________Tolerance of various soybean varieties in two growth stages to herbicidaldiurethanes;leaf treatment in the greenhouse Appl. Soybean variety and % damage in stages I and II.sup.+)Compound rate SRF 450 Dare Bragg Forrest Lee 68 Tracy Hurrelbrinkno. kg/ha I II I II I II I II I II I II I II__________________________________________________________________________1 1.0 -- 8 5 -- 10 0 -- -- 0 -- 10 -- -- -- 2.0 -- 8 5 -- 10 0 5 5 0 0 10 0 -- 2 4.0 5 8 5 10 10 0 5 5 8 10 10 0 -- -- 1.0 -- 5 5 -- 15 0 -- -- 0 -- 10 -- -- --7 2.0 -- 5 10 -- 15 0 15 2 0 0 10 0 -- 0 4.0 8 5 10 5 15 0 15 2 0 2 10 10 -- -- 1.0 -- 2 15 -- 15 0 -- -- 5 -- 15 -- -- --6 2.0 -- 2 15 -- 15 5 70 25 10 20 15 0 -- 10 4.0 30 2 40 10 30 5 70 25 20 25 20 0 -- --3-isopropyl- 1.0 -- 0 10 -- 15 5 -- -- 0 -- 5 -- -- --2,1,3-benzo- 2.0 -- 0 10 -- 15 5 5 0 0 0 5 0 -- 85thiadiazinone- 4.0 2 0 10 20 15 5 5 0 0 0 5 0 -- --(4)-2,2-dioxide(prior art)__________________________________________________________________________ 0 = no damage .sup.+) I = undivided to first trifoliolate leaf 100 = plants destroyed II = 1 1/2 to 2 trifoliolate leaves
Table 6__________________________________________________________________________Tolerance of various herbicidal diurethanes by various crops;leaf treatment in the greenhouse Crop plants and % damage Appl.Compound rate Arach. Beta Gossyp. Oryza Phaseol. Sorgh.no. kg/ha hyp. vulg. hirs. sat. vulg. bic.__________________________________________________________________________ 0.5 0 0 7 12 -- --1 2.0 0 2 10 16 0 0 4.0 0 12 20 22 0 0 0.5 0 6 0 7 -- --5 2.0 0 10 3 10 0 0 4.0 -- 30 10 13 0 0 0.5 0 15 -- 18 -- --7 2.0 0 25 62 20 -- 0 4.0 -- 33 58 20 -- 0 0.5 0 0 -- 0 -- --2 2.0 0 0 40 8 -- 0 4.0 -- 2 40 15 -- 0 0.5 0 2 23 12 -- --6 2.0 0 18 30 16 0 0 4.0 0 19 50 27 0 20__________________________________________________________________________ 0 = no damage 100 = plants destroyed
Table 7__________________________________________________________________________Herbicidal action and crop plant tolerance of diurethanes;postemergence treatment in the openAppl. Test plants and % damageCompound rate Beta Amar. Anth./ Brassica Cheuop. Galins. Medic. Polyg. Sinap./ Sper. Stellno. kg/ha vulg. retr. Matr. napus+) album spp. sat.+) conv. raph. arv. med.__________________________________________________________________________1 0.5 0 98 67 88 87 99 85 68 87 75 82 1.0 1 99 77 99 93 100 78 81 97 92 984 0.5 0 5 2 46 42 85 45 0 20 20 75 1.0 0 6 11 63 57 92 45 3 35 52 855 0.5 0 95 55 89 83 95 60 55 58 80 60 1.0 1 100 81 97 94 98 73 90 88 97 866 0.5 1 91 54 76 82 80 55 97 67 83 40 1.0 8 98 73 95 95 83 74 98 84 99 887 0.5 5 66 37 14 18 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0 -- 78 61 46 32 -- -- -- -- -- --2 0.5 4 87 71 74 62 -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0 -- 93 87 99 76 -- -- -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________ 0 = no damage 100 = plants destroyed +) unwanted plant in beet
Table 8______________________________________Tolerance of various herbicidal diurethanes bysugarbeets; postemergence treatment in the openCompound Appl. rate Test plant and % damageno. kg/ha Beta vulgaris spp. alt.______________________________________1 2.0 4 4.0 135 2.0 10 4.0 266 2.0 24 4.0 44______________________________________ 0 = no damage 100 = complete destruction
Table 9______________________________________Postemergence treatment in the greenhouseTest plants Compound and % damage 11 8 9 prior artkg/ha 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0______________________________________Arachis hypogaea 0 5 0 0 0 5Beta vulgaris 0 0 0 0 0 0Glycine max 0 0 0 0 0 10Gossypium hirsutum 3 15 -- -- 35 40Euphorbia geniculata -- -- 90 90 20 60Datura stramonium 90 90 -- -- 70 90Ipomoea spp. 60 70 58 75 45 45Mercurialis annua 100 100 75 95 0 0Sesbania exaltata 57 70 70 90 45 45Setaria viridis 78 95 -- -- 40 40Sinapis alba 60 82 80 87 45 45Solanum nigrum 82 95 -- -- 60 60Thlaspi arvense -- -- 95 95 40 40 8 13 prior art 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0______________________________________Arachis hypogaea 0 5 0 5Glycine max 0 0 0 0Helianthus annuus 0 0 60 60Triticum aestivum 7 7 30 30Chrysanthemum segetum 95 -- 0 --Datura stramonium 90 90 70 90Mercurialis annua 100 100 0 50Solanum nigrum 82 95 22 36 9 13 prior art 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0______________________________________Arachis hypogaea 0 0 0 5Beta vulgaris 0 0 5 5Glycine max 0 0 0 0Lamium amplexicaule 80 100 70 95Mercurialis annua 75 95 0 50Thlaspi arvense 95 95 95 95 8 14 prior art 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0______________________________________Arachis hypogaea 0 5 0 0Beta vulgaris 0 0 0 0Glycine max 0 0 0 0Datura stramonium 90 90 0 10Ipomoea spp. 68 70 10 40Mercurialis annua 100 100 0 0Sesbania exaltata 57 75 10 20Setaria viridis 78 95 20 35Solanum nigrum 82 95 0 10 9 12 prior art 1.0 1.0______________________________________Arachis hypogaea 0 0Beta vulgaris 0 5Glycine max 0 10Chrysanthemum segetum 95 20Euphorbia geniculata 90 50Lamium amplexicaule 80 100Mercurialis annua 75 30Sesbania exaltata 70 80______________________________________ 0 = no damage 100 = complete destruction
Table 10______________________________________Postemergence treatment in the openTest plants Compound and % damage 8 11 prior artkg/ha 1.0 1.0______________________________________Beta vulgaris 10 0Anthemis/Matricaria 75 30Brassica napus 100 50(as unwanted plant)Chenopodium album 78 50Polygonum convolvulus 70 (0.75 kg/ha) 50 (0.75 kg/ha)Raphanus raphanistrum/Sinapis arvensis 92 45 9 11 prior art 1.0 1.0______________________________________Anthemis/Matricaria 67 30Brassica napus 96 50Chenopodium album 90 50Galinsoga parviflora 100 100Lamium amplexicaule 95 60 9 12 prior art 1.0 1.0______________________________________Amaranthus retroflexus 90 65Chenopodium album 90 90Galinsoga parvilfora 100 100Polygonum aviculare 80 20Raphanus raphanistrum/Sinapis arvensis 100 100Thlaspi arvense 90 90 8 13 prior art 1.0 1.0______________________________________Beta vulgaris 10 12Glycine max 2 0Brassica napus(as unwanted plant) 100 89Raphanus raphanistrum/Sinapis arvense 92 79 9 13 prior art 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0______________________________________Glycine max 0 0 0 0Amaranthus retroflexus 80 90 76 91Brassica napus(as unwanted plant) 94 96 67 89Chenopodium album 82 90 74 88Raphanus raphanistrum/Sinapis arvensis 95 100 52 79Thlspi arvense 50 90 0 50 8 14 prior art 1.0 1.0______________________________________Anthemis/Matricaria 75 30Raphanus raphanistrum 92 70______________________________________ 0 = no damage 100 = complete destruction
The herbicides according to the invention may be sprayed directly onto the leaves of the crop plants. It is also possible to eliminate unwanted plants by post-directed or layby applications. In this case, the spray is directed in such a manner that the leaves of the crop plants are not -- or only slightly -- touched, and the smaller weeds are fully contacted. This method is particularly important for the treatment of low-growing unwanted plants in bush or tree crops.
In view of the application possibilities, the herbicides according to the invention or compositions containing them may not only be used in the crops listed in the tables but also in a much wider range of crops for removing unwanted plants. The amount of active ingredient applied may vary from 0.1 to 15 kg/ha and more, depending on the weeds to be controlled. The following crops may be mentioned by way of example:
______________________________________Botanical name Common name______________________________________Allium cepa onionsAnanas comosus pineappleAsparagus officinalis asparagusAvena sativa oatsBeta vulgaris spp. rapa fodder beetsBeta vulgaris esculenta table beets, red beetsBrassica napus var. napus rapeBrassica napus var. napobrassicaBrassica napus var. rapa turnipsBrassica napus var. silvestrisCamellia sinensis tea plantsCarthamus tinctorius safflowerCitrus limon lemonCitrus maxima grapefruitCitrus reticulataCitrus sinensis orange treesCoffea arabica (Coffea canephora, coffee plantsCoffea liberica)Cucumis melo melonsCucumis sativus cucumberCynodon dactylon Bermudagrass in turf and lawnsDaucus carota carrotsElaeis guineensis oil palmsFragaria vesca strawberries -helianthus annuus sunflowersHelianthus tuberosusHevea brasiliensis rubber plantsHordeum vulgare barleyHumulus lupulus hopsIpomoea batatas sweet potatoesLactuca sativa lettuceLens culinaris lentilsLinum usitatissimum flaxLycopersicon lycopersicum tomatoesMalus spp. apple treesManihot esculenta cassavaMedicago sativa alfalfa (lucerne)Mentha piperita peppermintMusa spp. banana plantsNicotiana tabacum tobacco(n. rustica)Olea europaea olive treesOryza sativa ricePanicum miliaceumPhaseolus lunatas limabeansPhaseolus mungo mungbeansPennisetum glaucumPetroselinum crispum parsleyspp. tuberosumPicea abies norway spruceAbies alba fir treesPinus spp. pine treesPisum sativum English peasPrunus avium cherry treesPrunus domestica plum treesPrunus persica peach treesPyrus communis pear treesRibes sylvestre redcurrantsRibes uva-crispaRicinus communisSaccharum officinarum sugar caneSecale cereale ryeSesamum indicum sesameSolanum tuberosum Irish potatoesSorghum dochnaSpinacia oleracea spinachTheobroma cacao cacao plantsTrifolium pratense red cloverTriticum aestivum wheatVaccinium corymbosum blueberriesVaccinium vitis-idaea cranberriesVicia faba tick beansVigna sinensis (V. unguiculata) cow peasVitis vinifera grapesZea mays Indian corn, sweet corn, maize______________________________________
The following list contains herbicides which, in admixture with the compounds of the invention, contribute toward an improvement in action over a wider range of plant species or intensify the action per unit of active ingredient:
__________________________________________________________________________ ##STR12## ##STR13##R R.sup.1H H and saltsH CH.sub.3 and saltsH Cl and saltsH F and saltsCH.sub.2OCH.sub.3 H ##STR14## ##STR15## ##STR16## ##STR17## ##STR18## ##STR19## ##STR20## ##STR21## ##STR22##R X Y R.sup.1__________________________________________________________________________CH.sub.3 Cl Cl Na ##STR23## Cl H CH.sub.3 ##STR24## H H H and salts ##STR25## H CH.sub.3 CH.sub.3 ##STR26## H CH.sub.3 Na ##STR27## H CH.sub.3 Na ##STR28## H CH.sub.3 CH.sub.2 -i- Propyl ##STR29## H CH.sub.3 C.sub.2 H.sub.5 ##STR30## H CH.sub.3 i-Propyl ##STR31## H CH.sub.3 CH.sub.3C.sub.2 H.sub. 5 Cl Cl Na ##STR32## ##STR33## ##STR34## ##STR35## ##STR36## ##STR37## salts, esters ##STR38##RCH.sub.3NHCH.sub.3 ##STR39## ##STR40## ##STR41## ##STR42## ##STR43## and Na salt ##STR44## salts and esters ##STR45## ##STR46## ##STR47##__________________________________________________________________________
It is useful to be able to apply the compounds of the invention either alone or in combination with other herbicides, in admixture with other crop protection agents, for example agents for combatting pests or phytopathogenic fungi, and growth regulators. Of further interest is the fact that the compounds of the invention may be mixed with solutions of mineral fertilizers used to eliminate trace element or nutritional deficiencies.
Application may be effected for instance in the form of directly sprayable solutions, powders, suspensions (including high-percentage aqueous, oily or other suspensions), dispersions, emulsions, oil dispersions, pastes, dusts, broadcasting agents, or granules by spraying, atomizing, dusting, broadcasting or watering. The forms of application depend entirely on the purpose for which the agents are being used; in any case they should ensure as fine a distribution of the active ingredient as possible.
For the preparation of solutions, emulsions, pastes and oil dispersions to be sprayed direct, mineral oil fractions of medium to high boiling point, such as kerosene or diesel oil, further coal-tar oils, etc. and oils of vegetable or animal origin, aliphatic, cyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, paraffin, tetrahydronaphthalene, alkylated naphthalenes and their derivatives such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone, chlorobenzene, isophorone, etc., and strongly polar solvents such as dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, N-methylpyrrolidone, water, etc. are suitable.
Aqueous formulations may be prepared from emulsion concentrates, pastes, oil dispersions or wettable powders by adding water. To prepare emulsions, pastes and oil dispersions the ingredients as such or dissolved in an oil or solvent may be homogenized in water by means of wetting or dispersing agents, adherents or emulsifiers. Concentrates which are suitable for dilution with water may be prepared from active ingredient, wetting agent, adherent, emulsifying or dispersing agent and possibly solvent or oil.
Examples of surfactants are: alkali metal, alkaline earth metal and ammonium salts of ligninsulfonic acid, naphthalenesulfonic acids, phenolsulfonic acids, alkylaryl sulfonates, alkyl sulfates, and alkyl sulfonates, alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts of dibutylnaphthalenesulfonic acid, lauryl ether sulfate, fatty alcohol sulfates, alkali metal and alkaline earth metal salts of fatty acids, salts of sulfated hexadecanols, heptadecanols, and octadecanols, salts of sulfated fatty alcohol glycol ether, condensation products of sulfonated naphthalene and naphthalene derivatives with formaldehyde, condensation products of naphthalene or naphthalenesulfonic acids with phenol and formaldehyde, polyoxyethylene octylphenol ethers, ethoxylated isooctylphenol, ethoxylated octylphenol and ethoxylated nonylphenol, alkylphenol polyglycol ethers, tributylphenol polyglycol ethers, alkylaryl polyester alcohols, isotridecyl alcohols, fatty alcohol ethylene oxide condensates, ethoxylated castor oil, polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers, ethoxylated polyoxypropylene, lauryl alcohol polyglycol ether acetal, sorbitol esters, lignin, sulfite waste liquors and methyl cellulose.
Powders, dusts and broadcasting agents may be prepared by mixing or grinding the active ingredients with a solid carrier.
Granules, e.g., coated, impregnated or homogeneous granules, may be prepared by bonding the active ingredients to solid carriers. Examples of solid carriers are mineral earths such as silicic acid, silica gels, silicates, talc, kaolin, Attaclay, limestone, lime, chalk, bole, loess, clay, dolomite, diatomaceous earth, calcium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, magnesium oxide, ground plastics, fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate, ammonium nitrate, and ureas, and vegetable products such as grain flours, bark meal, wood meal, and nutshell meal, cellulosic powders, etc.
The formulations contain from 0.1 to 95, and preferably 0.5 to 90, % by weight of active ingredient.
There may be added to the compositions or individual active ingredients oils of various types, wetting agents or adherents, herbicides, fungicides, nematocides, insecticides, bactericides, trace elements, fertilizers, antifoams (e.g., silicones), growth regulators, antidotes and other herbicidally effective compounds.
These agents may be added to the herbicides according to the invention in a ratio by weight of from 1:10 to 10:1. The same applies to oils, wetting agents and adherents, fungicides, nematocides, insecticides, bactericides, antidotes and growth regulators.
EXAMPLE 3
90 parts by weight of compound 1 is mixed with 10 parts by weight of N-methyl-.alpha.-pyrrolidone. A mixture is obtained which is suitable for application in the form of very fine drops.
EXAMPLE 4
20 parts by weight of compound 2 is dissolved in a mixture consisting of 80 parts by weight of xylene, 10 parts by weight of the adduct of 8 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide to 1 mole of olefic acid-N-monoethanolamide, 5 parts by weight of the calcium salt of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, and 5 parts by weight of the adduct of 40 moles of ethylene oxide to 1 mole of castor oil. By pouring the solution into 100,000 parts by weight of water and uniformly distributing it therein, an aqueous dispersion is obtained containing 0.02% by weight of the active ingredient.
EXAMPLE 5
20 parts by weight of compound 3 is dissolved in a mixture consisting of 40 parts by weight of cyclohexanone, 30 parts by weight of isobutanol, 20 parts by weight of the adduct of 7 moles of ethylene oxide to 1 mole of isooctylphenol, and 10 parts by weight of the adduct of 40 moles of ethylene oxide to 1 mole of castor oil. By pouring the solution into 100,000 parts by weight of water and uniformly distributing it therein, an aqueous dispersion is obtained containing 0.02% by weight of the active ingredient.
EXAMPLE 6
20 parts by weight of compound 2 is dissolved in a mixture consisting of 25 parts by weight of cyclohexanol, 65 parts by weight of a mineral oil fraction having a boiling point between 210.degree. and 280.degree. C., and 10 parts by weight of the adduct of 40 moles of ethylene oxide to 1 mole of castor oil. By pouring the solution into 100,000 parts by weight of water and uniformly distributing it therein, an aqueous dispersion is obtained containing 0.02% by weight of the active ingredient.
EXAMPLE 7
20 parts by weight of compound 3 is well mixed with 3 parts by weight of the sodium salt of diisobutylnaphthalene-.alpha.-sulfonic acid, 17 parts by weight of the sodium salt of a ligninsulfonic acid obtained from a sulfite waste liquor, and 60 parts by weight of powdered silica gel, and triturated in a hammer mill. By uniformly distributing the mixture in 20,000 parts by weight of water, a spray liquid is obtained containing 0.1% by weight of the active ingredient.
EXAMPLE 8
3 parts by weight of compound 1 is intimately mixed with 97 parts by weight of particulate kaolin. A dust is obtained containing 3% by weight of the active ingredient.
EXAMPLE 9
30 parts by weight of compound 2 is intimately mixed with a mixture consisting of 92 parts by weight of powdered silica gel and 8 parts by weight of paraffin oil which has been sprayed onto the surface of this silica gel. A formulation of the active ingredient is obtained having good adherence.
EXAMPLE 10
40 parts by weight of compound 1 is intimately mixed with 10 parts of the sodium salt of a phenolsulfonic acid-urea-formaldehyde condensate, 2 parts of silica gel and 48 parts of water to give a stable aqueous dispersion. Dilution in 100,000 parts by weight of water gives an aqueous dispersion containing 0.04 wt% of active ingredient.
EXAMPLE 11
20 parts of compound 2 is intimately mixed with 2 parts of the calcium salt of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, 8 parts of a fatty alcohol polyglycol ether, 2 parts of the sodium salt of a phenolsulfonic acid-urea-formaldehyde condensate and 68 parts of a paraffinic mineral oil. A stable oily dispersion is obtained.

Number	Date	Country	Kind
2638897	Jul 1976	DE
2725074	Jun 1977	DE

Number	Name	Date
3865867	Olin et al.	Feb 1975
3898075	Freund et al.	Aug 1975
3901936	Boroschewski	Aug 1975
3904396	Boroschewski et al.	Sep 1975
3904669	Boroschewski et al.	Sep 1975
3920829	Rohr et al.	Nov 1975

Diurethanes

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

US Referenced Citations (6)