The present disclosure is generally related to laser diode collimation and more particularly is related to far field divergence reshaping.
Multimode laser diodes generally emit light that is highly asymmetric in horizontal directions (X and Y directions), leading to a beam with a fast axis and a slow axis. In the fast axis, the emission area is very small, but the angular divergence is large. Thus, the beam expands quickly in the direction of the fast axis. In the slow axis, the emission area is comparatively large, but the angular divergence is comparatively small. Thus, the beam expands slowly in the direction of the slow axis. The resultant beam is asymmetric across both axes. Even when the resultant beam is collimated, this results in an asymmetrical distribution at the far field.
Many applications of laser diodes require beams with low asymmetry. Traditionally, this leads to compromises in laser power or beam size to reach desired brightness. When laser diodes are arranged in an array, the array geometry may govern the collimation optics' ability to correct divergence. For example, where the vertical spacing, or bar to bar pitch, between laser diode bars is larger than optimal it may require the emitter to emitter pitch to decrease. This may result in the divergence in the fast axis being smaller than optimal and the slow axis being larger than optimal based on the constraints of the optical system.
Residual divergence is the extent of the angular distribution of light after passing through the collimating optics. For a typical slow axis collimating optic the residual divergence can be defined by the following equation:
where Θresidual is the residual divergence, y is the source width, and f is the focal length of a collimating lens.
For a laser diode bar, the minimum residual divergence may be achieved by maximizing the focal length of the collimating lens. Maximum focal length can be calculated using the following formula:
where p is the emitter to emitter pitch and Θsource is the divergence of the source.
For common laser diode array collimation, the maximum focal length to minimize, divergence is the distance from the source to the location of where the largest angle rays from adjacent emitters intersect. A laser diode array may consist of a number of laser diode bars stacked vertically. The bar-to-bar pitch, which is the height between vertically adjacent diodes, is generally based on factors such as thermal dissipation and optical beam size. The slow axis emitter pitch may be smaller than ideal for a given power level resulting in lower than ideal brightness in the slow axis.
Thus, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the industry to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a divergence reshaping apparatus for laser diodes having a fast axis and a slow axis. Briefly described, in architecture, one embodiment of the apparatus, among others, can be implemented as follows. A divergence reshaping apparatus for laser diodes having a fast axis and a slow axis includes a fast axis collimator element having positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis. A slow axis magnifier element has no optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis. An objective element has positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis. A slow axis collimator element has negative optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis. Every element is optically aligned down an optical axis, and wherein a beam travelling through every element is collimated, compressed and shifted in the fast axis and expanded and collimated in the slow axis.
In one aspect of the disclosure, the fast axis collimator element has a plano-convex shape in the fast axis; the slow axis magnifier element has a convex shape in the slow axis; the objective element has a convex shape in the fast axis; and the slow axis collimator element has a concave shape in the fast axis and a convex shape in the slow axis.
In another aspect of the disclosure, the objective element is an off-axis objective element aligned to shift the beam in the fast axis.
In yet another aspect of the disclosure, the off-axis objective element has sectional radii of curvature, and the off-axis objective element preferably is a single element having a plurality of radii of curvature, or the off-axis objective element is a plurality of objective elements each having an individual radius of curvature.
In still yet another aspect of the disclosure, the laser diodes operate in at least one chosen from the set of: the visible and the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The present disclosure can also be viewed as providing methods of reshaping a laser beam along a fast and slow axis. In this regard, one embodiment of such a method, among others, can be broadly summarized by the following steps: generating a laser beam from a laser diode; collimating the laser beam along a fast axis using a fast axis collimator element having positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis; magnifying laser beam along the slow axis using a slow axis magnifier element having no optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis; compressing the laser beam along the fast axis using an objective element having positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis; and collimating the laser beam along the slow axis and compressing the laser beam along the fast axis using a slow axis collimator element having negative optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis.
In one aspect of the method, the fast axis collimator element has a plano-convex shape in the fast axis; the slow axis magnifier element has a convex shape in the slow axis; the objective element has a convex shape in the fast axis; and the slow axis collimator element has a concave shape in the fast axis and a convex shape in the slow axis.
In another aspect of the method, the objective element is an off-axis objective element aligned to shift the beam in the fast axis, the off-axis objective element preferably has sectional radii of curvature, and the off-axis objective element preferably is a single element having a plurality of radii of curvature, the off-axis objective element preferably is a plurality of objective elements each having an individual radius of curvature, and/or the laser diodes operate in at least one chosen from the set of: the visible and the infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.
The present disclosure can also be viewed as providing a divergence reshaping array. Briefly described, in architecture, one embodiment of the array, among others, can be implemented as follows. A divergence reshaping array for an array of laser diodes having a fast axis and a slow axis includes an array of divergence reshaping apparatuses corresponding to the array of laser diodes. Each divergence reshaping apparatus includes a fast axis collimator element has positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis. A slow axis magnifier element has no optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis. An off-axis objective element has positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis, the off-axis objective element aligned to shift a laser beam in the fast axis. A slow axis collimator element has negative optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis. Every element is optically aligned down an optical axis. The laser beam travelling through every element is collimated, compressed and shifted in the fast axis and expanded and collimated in the slow axis.
In one aspect of the array the fast axis collimator element has a plano-convex shape in the fast axis; the slow axis magnifier element has a convex shape in the slow axis; the objective element has a convex shape in the fast axis; and the slow axis collimator element has a concave shape in the fast axis and a convex shape in the slow axis.
In another aspect of the array, the off-axis objective element has sectional radii of curvature, the off-axis objective element preferably is a single element having a plurality of radii of curvature, or the off-axis objective element is a plurality of objective elements each having an individual radius of curvature.
In still another aspect of the array laterally adjacent off-axis objective elements are aligned to alternatingly shift corresponding laterally adjacent beams in a positive direction off of the fast axis and a negative direction off of the fast axis.
Other systems, methods, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will be or become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the present disclosure, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The present disclosure describes an optical system and apparatus for collimating one or more laser diode beams while reshaping the beams on the fast and slow axes to minimize the residual slow axis divergence of the beams. In one example, the optical system and apparatus may reduce slow axis residual divergence, increasing fast axis residual divergence according to the inverse of the change in the slow axis residual divergence.
To achieve higher slow axis brightness than typical slow axis collimation provides, the divergence reshaping apparatus trades off fast axis brightness for increased slow axis brightness. For the divergence reshaping apparatus, in the fast axis, each beam from an emitter on a laser diode bar is collimated, compressed and is shifted vertically, forming multiple rows from each bar. In the slow axis, each beam from an emitter passes through a slow axis magnification optic before the beam expands to the emitter pitch allowing for the use of high fill factor laser diode bars. Fill factor may be the amount of emission width divided by the length of the bar. For example, if the bar is 10 mm wide with 50 emitters of 0.1 mm length on a 0.2 mm pitch, the fill factor would be 50%. Each beam continues and expands to a width larger than the emitter pitch where it is then collimated by the slow axis collimator. Because the design conserves étendue and the beam from each emitter in the slow axis direction is able to expand mom than the emitter to emitter pitch, the beam in the slow axis becomes brighter than what is achievable with typical slow axis collimation.
The fast axis and slow axis refer to two orthogonal axes which are both orthogonal to the direction of propagation of the laser beam and the optical axis. For the purposes of the present disclosure, the slow axis will be illustrated using an x-axis, the fast axis will be illustrated using a y-axis, and the direction of propagation using a z-axis. In general, the x-axis is a horizontal axis, the y-axis is a vertical axis, and the z-axis is a lateral axis.
The reshaping apparatus 1 may include any suitable size, number, and shape of optical elements therein. For instance, the optical elements described above may be planar, spherical, aspheric, such as parabolic, elliptical, and hyperbolic, or any combination thereof. In one example, the reshaping apparatus 1 may include a fast axis collimator element 10 having a plano-convex shape in the fast axis and a planar shape in the slow axis. The slow axis magnifier element 20 may have a planar shape in the fast axis and a convex shape in the slow axis. The objective element 30 may have a convex shape in the fast axis and a planar shape in the slow axis. The slow axis collimator element 40 may have a concave shape in the fast axis and a convex shape in the slow axis.
The elements 10, 20, 30, 40 may be any optically transmissive and refractive elements, depending on the design and the lasers in use with the apparatus. For instance, the elements 10-40 may be made from glass, plastic, birefringent materials, optically-doped materials, refraction gratings, polarized materials, and the like. In one example, the elements 10-40 may be glass or plastic lenses having high transmissivity in the visible and infrared ranges. The radius of curvature, thickness, spacing, and alignment of each element 10, 20, 30, 40 may be dependent on the laser diode source (not shown) and the source size.
The fast axis collimator element 10 is shown having positive optical power in the fast axis, and no optical power in the slow axis. The fast axis collimator element 10 may work to expand and collimate the beam 3 in the fast axis only, while leaving the beam 3 in the slow axis otherwise unaffected. The slow axis magnifier element 20 has no optical power in the fast axis and a positive optical power in the slow axis.
The bars and arrays of laser diodes and corresponding divergence reshaping apparatuses may include any number of elements, including any number of rows and columns. The bars and arrays may be any suitable shape and configuration for achieving a far field laser beam of desired size, shape, and intensity distribution.
Step 610 includes generating a laser beam from a laser diode.
Step 620 includes collimating the laser beam along a fast axis using a fast axis collimator element having positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis.
Step 630 includes magnifying the laser beam along the slow axis using a slow axis magnifier element having no optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis.
Step 640 includes compressing the laser beam along the fast axis using an objective element having positive optical power in the fast axis and no optical power in the slow axis.
Step 650 includes collimating the laser beam along the slow axis and compressing the laser beam along the fast axis using a slow axis collimator element having negative optical power in the fast axis and positive optical power in the slow axis.
The method may further include any other features, components, or functions disclosed relative to any other figure of this disclosure.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present disclosure, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the disclosure without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the disclosure. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and the present disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/790,193 filed Jan. 9, 2019, titled “Divergence Reshaping Array,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3711939 | Stoll | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3805375 | LaCombe et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3936322 | Blum et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
| 4092614 | Sakuma et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4156879 | Lee | May 1979 | A |
| 4306278 | Fulton et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4653056 | Baer et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4767674 | Shirai | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4803691 | Scifres et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4813762 | Leger | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4881237 | Donnelly | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4903274 | Taney et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4947401 | Hinata et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4980893 | Thornton et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4993148 | Adachi | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5008737 | Burnham et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5031187 | Orenstein et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5040187 | Karpinski | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5045972 | Supan | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5060237 | Peterson | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5061974 | Onodera et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5099488 | Ahrabi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102825 | Brennan et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5105429 | Mundinger et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5105430 | Mundinger et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5128951 | Karpinski | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5202706 | Hasegawa | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212706 | Jain | May 1993 | A |
| 5212707 | Heidel et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5253260 | Palombo | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5284790 | Karpinski | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5298762 | Ou | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5305344 | Patel | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5311530 | Wagner et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5311535 | Karpinski | May 1994 | A |
| 5325384 | Herb et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5394426 | Joslin | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5418799 | Tada | May 1995 | A |
| 5440577 | Tucker | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450430 | Chang | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455738 | Montesano et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5497391 | Paoli | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504767 | Jamison et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5521931 | Biegelsen et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5526373 | Karpinski | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5568498 | Nilsson | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5593815 | Ahn | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5627850 | Irwin et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5644586 | Kawano et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5679963 | Klem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5764675 | Juhala | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778020 | Gokay | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783316 | Colella et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5812573 | Shiomi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5835515 | Huang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5835518 | Mundinger et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5848083 | Haden et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856990 | Nilsson | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5909458 | Freitas et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913108 | Stephens et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923692 | Staskus et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930279 | Apollonov et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5987045 | Albares | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6031285 | Nishibayashi | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6101208 | Gokay | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6208677 | Moyer | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6252179 | Lauffer | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6281471 | Smart | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6295307 | Hoden et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6352873 | Hoden | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6396857 | Labranche | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6424667 | Endriz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6480514 | Lorenzen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493373 | Boucart | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6535533 | Lorenzen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6535541 | Boucart et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6542531 | Sirbu | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6727117 | McCoy | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6865200 | Takigawa et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 7016383 | Rice | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7286359 | Khbeis et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7359413 | Tzuk et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7529286 | Gokay et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7580189 | Urey | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7660335 | Thiagarajan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7864825 | Thiagarajan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7944955 | Thiagarajan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8017935 | Staszewski et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8653550 | Mastro | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8664524 | Gamett | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8848753 | Koenning | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 9256073 | Chann | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 10120149 | Mathai | Nov 2018 | B1 |
| 20010017870 | Hayakawa | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001864 | Ishikawa et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020009106 | Miyokawa et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020014631 | Iwata | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020025096 | Wang et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086483 | Kim | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020086486 | Tanaka | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20030116767 | Kneissl et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040037340 | Yanagisawa | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052280 | Rice | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040082112 | Stephens | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125459 | Tanitsu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264521 | Ness et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050095755 | Nakata et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050232628 | Hold et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050254539 | Klimek | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060011938 | Debray | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060197100 | Shen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070116079 | Giniunas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070273957 | Zalevsky | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080089380 | Konig et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123710 | Brick | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080130223 | Nakamura | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213710 | Schultz | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080259983 | Trococoli | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090015185 | Yoshida | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090932 | Bour et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20100012188 | Garnett | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20110051759 | Telford | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110103409 | Sipes | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110241549 | Wootton | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110280269 | Ghang-Hasnain | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120114001 | Fang et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120153254 | Mastro | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120252144 | Schroeder et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120287958 | Lell | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130016752 | Lell | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130112667 | Holmgren | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130259074 | Newman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130271959 | Woodgate | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20140293554 | Shashkov | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150063387 | Joseph et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150162478 | Fafard | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207011 | Gamett | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150207294 | Brick et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150255960 | Kanskar | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20160014878 | Kilkenny | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160147025 | Sakamoto | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20170051884 | Raring | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170288367 | Tanigucki | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170338194 | Gittemeier | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180152000 | Crawford et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180254606 | McElhinney et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180261975 | Pavlov | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180335582 | Iskige | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180337513 | Crawford et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20200027839 | Hino | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200028332 | Kobayashi | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200075529 | Otsuka | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 208 370 | Jul 2005 | CA |
| 968430 | Feb 1958 | DE |
| 19518177 | Nov 1996 | DE |
| 10062579 | Jun 2001 | DE |
| 102008040374 | Jan 2010 | DE |
| 1439618 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1452614 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1811617 | Jul 2007 | EP |
| 1887666 | Feb 2008 | EP |
| 2110903 | Oct 2009 | EP |
| 2305400 | Apr 2011 | EP |
| 2002111058 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| European Search Report issued in related European Patent Application Serial No. 20150730.8, dated Jul. 3, 2020 (9 pages). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,889, filed Aug. 13, 2019, Ruben et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/540,961, filed Aug. 14, 2019, Helmrich et al. |
| Chinese Official Action issued in related Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201780073945.8, dated Sep. 21, 2020 (16 pages) with translation. |
| Official Action issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application Serial No. 07117048.7-2222, dated Aug. 6, 2009, 4 pages. |
| Official Action issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application Serial No. 07117048.7-2222, dated Nov. 20, 2008, 9 pages. |
| Intention to Grant issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application Serial No. 09157643.9, dated Apr. 7, 2017, 6 pages. |
| Official Action issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application Serial No. 09157643.9, dated Aug. 22, 2016, 5 pages. |
| Official Action issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application No. 09157643.9, dated Apr. 16, 2014, 2 pages. |
| European Search Report issued in application No. 09157643.9, dated Aug. 9, 2013 (7 pgs). |
| European Search Report issued in application No. 20150730.8, dated Jul. 3, 2020 (8 pgs). |
| Intention to Grant issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application Serial No. 16172620.3, dated Jul. 19, 2019, 3 pages. |
| European Search Report issued in application No. 18173282.7-1211, dated Oct. 8, 2018 (8 pgs). |
| Intention to Grant issued in Applicants' corresponding EPO Application Serial No. 06845311.7, dated Nov. 9, 2010, 5 pages. |
| European Search Report issued in application No. 06845311.7, dated Mar. 31, 2010 (9 pgs). |
| Official Action issued in European application No. 18173282.7-1211, dated Jan. 23, 2020 (6 pgs). |
| European Search Report issued in application No. 16172620.3, dated Oct. 25, 2016 (9 pgs). |
| European Search Report issued in application No. 20150730.8, dated Jul. 3, 2020 (9 pages). |
| European Supplemental Search Report issued in related European Patent Application 17875888.4, dated Jul. 9, 2020 (11 pages). |
| Feng, et al., “High efficient GaN-based laster diodes with tunnel junction”, Applied Physics Letters 103, AIP Publishing, LLC, 2013. |
| Rieprich, et al., “Proceedings of SPIE—Assessment of factors regulating the thermal lens profile and lateral brightness in high power diode lasers”, SPIEL ASE, 2017. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Jul. 18, 2019 (24 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Apr. 24, 2018 (10 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Feb. 14, 2019 (13 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Mar. 6, 2020 (12 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Jun. 15, 2020 (12 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Oct. 14, 2020 (11 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Oct. 4, 2018 (14 pgs). |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, dated Feb. 2, 2021 (7 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,923, dated Aug. 9, 2018 (17 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,923, dated Apr. 19, 2018 (16 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,923, dated Oct. 2, 2017 (11 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,126, dated Jul. 23, 2009 (7 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,126, dated Apr. 24, 2009 (8 pgs). |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,126, dated Sep. 22, 2009 (7 pgs). |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,141, dated Jan. 11, 2011 (11 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,889, dated Feb. 1, 2021 (18 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,889, dated Oct. 21, 2020 (16 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,889, dated Jul. 1, 2020 (19 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,029, dated Aug. 22, 2008 (8 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/540,961, dated Nov. 17, 2020 (13 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/540,961, dated Aug. 5, 2020 (9 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,030, dated Nov. 30, 2009 (16 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,030, dated Jun. 24, 2009 (13 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,030, dated Apr. 3, 2009 (13 pgs). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,030, dated Nov. 12, 2008 (12 pgs). |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,030, dated Aug. 30, 2010 (7 pgs). |
| Giri et al, “Influence of Hot Electron Scattering and Electron-Phonon Interactions on Thermal Boundary Conductance at Metal/Nonmetal Interfaces” Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 136, dated Sep. 2014 (6 pgs). |
| Martin et al., “Thermal Behavior of Visible AlGaInP—GaInP Ridge Laser Diodes” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, vol. 28, No. 11, dated Nov. 1992 (7 pgs). |
| Monachon , C., “Thermal Boundary Conductance Between Metals and Dielectrics” thesis for the graduation of Doctor of Science, Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, 2013 (251 pgs). |
| Nekorkin et al., “Nonlinear mode mixing in dual-wavelength semiconductor lasers with tunnel junctions”, Applied Physics Letters 90, 171106 (2007) (3 pgs). |
| Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,820, dated Jun. 11, 2019 (8 pgs). |
| Rieprich et al., “Assessment of Factors Regulating the Thermal Lens Profile and Lateral Brightness in High Power Diode Lasers” Proc of SPIE, vol. 10085, No. 1008502-1, dated 2017 (10 pgs). |
| Zhang et al., “Thermal Transport Across Metal-Insulator Interface via Electron-Phonon Interaction,” Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, dated Oct. 2013 (15 pgs). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in application No. PCT/US2017/057209, dated Jun. 4, 2019 (8 pgs). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Appln. No. PCT/US17/57209 dated Jan. 16, 2018, 10 pgs. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Appln. No. PCT/US19/46410 dated Nov. 8, 2019, 7 pgs. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,820, dated Feb. 27, 2019 (26 pages). |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,820, dated Aug. 27, 2018 (28 pages). |
| Yonkee, B.P., et al., “Demonstration of a III-nitride edge-emitting laser diode utilizing a GaN tunnel junction contact”, Optics Express, vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 7816-7822, Apr. 2016. |
| Young, Lee W., Authorized officer, International Searching Authority, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US06/47448, completion date: Oct. 30, 2008. |
| Young, Lee W., Authorized officer, International Searching Authority, International Search Report, International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US06/47448, search date: Nov. 1, 2008. |
| Polyimide properties data sheet, www.mit.edu, Oct. 27, 2004 (Year 2004). |
| RO30000 Series Laminates, Rogers Corporation Data sheet (year 2020). |
| Sunstone, FR-4 PCB Material, Mar. 14, 2017 (Year 2017). |
| Chen et al., High-T Polymer Dec. 25, 2017 (Year 2017). |
| Robin K. Huang, Bien Chann, James Burgess, Michael Kaiman, Robert Overman, John D. Glenn, and Parviz Tayebati “Direct diode lasers with comparable beam quality to fiber, CO2, and solid state lasers”, Proc. SPIE 8241, High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications X, 824102 (Feb. 8, 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.907161 (abstract only). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/829,030, filed Jul. 26, 2007. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/556,767, filed Apr. 24, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/170,491, filed Oct. 13, 1998. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,126, filed Apr. 17, 2008. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/648,141, filed Dec. 28, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/728,923, filed Jun. 2, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/167,748, filed May 27, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/363,874, filed Nov. 29, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,820, filed May 22, 2017. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/299,029, filed Dec. 9, 2005. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,889, filed Aug. 13, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/895,931, filed Jun. 8, 2020. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/540,961, filed Aug. 14, 2019. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/022,767, filed Sep. 16, 2020. |
| Official Action issued in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 16/539,889, dated May 11, 2021, 21 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application Serial No. PCT/US2019/046410, dated Feb. 16, 2021, 6 pages. |
| European Search Report issued in corresponding European Patent Application Serial No. EP 20 19 646.6, dated Feb. 16, 2021, 7 pages. |
| Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 16/895,961, dated Dec. 10, 2021 (39 pgs). |
| Watson, Edward, Walter Whitaker, Christopher Brewer, and Scott Harris “Implementing Optical Phased Array Beam Steering with Cascaded Microlens Arrays” IEEE Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference; Mar. 9-16, 2002 (Year: 2002). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20200220321 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62790193 | Jan 2019 | US |