This application claims the benefit of the earlier filed German patent document DE 10 2007 004 065.4 having a filing date of Jan. 26, 2007.
The present invention relates to a connector.
Some electrical plugs are provided in electrical plug-in connectors in order to produce a releasable electrical connection between a first electrical line and a second electrical line, or between an electrical line and an electrical device. The electrical plugs may be used in a variety of fields of application, among others, within the industry of vehicle electronics, for example, for use as connector plugs for cigarette lighters. Due to the extreme environmental conditions in this field, high standards must be met with regard to the plug's vibratory strength, resistance to corrosion and temperature, and current-carrying capacity. Furthermore, the connection provided by such a plug must be able to be disconnected and reliably connected again as easily as possible.
A plug is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,364,686 that comprises a longitudinally divided spring arm with two spring arm portions 14, 15. The spring arm portion 14 has a latching projection 16 that is provided for engagingly connecting to the corresponding opening 20 in the socket 2. The spring arm portion 15 comprises a projection 17 that is provided in order to tightly engage with a correspondingly formed recess 21 in the socket 2. While the object of the latching projection 16 is to ensure a reliable connection between the plug 1 and the socket 2 by means of latching engagement, the object of the projection 17 is to provide a connection between the plug 1 and the socket 2 so that the plug 1 and the socket 2 are not loose relative to each other.
The spring arm portion 14 is further provided with a releasing button 18 by which means the two spring arm portions 14, 15 can be simultaneously actuated in such a way that the plug 1 is released from the socket 2.
However, as plugs of this type are used, above all, in the automotive industry, the plugs pose the danger that, when assembled, they may not properly lock into the socket by means of their latching projection or latch due to the application of force at the spring arm during insertion of the plug into the socket. In other words, while force is necessary for inserting or introducing the plug into the corresponding socket, it is possible that the person assembling the plug may, during assembly, prevent the spring arm from moving and thus block it with one of their fingers, for example a thumb, possibly preventing the plug from properly locking into the socket. If the plug does not properly lock into the socket, the plug can later become disengaged while in use. This is of particular concern with regard to plugs having sealed plug-in connectors since excess pressure may develop that can force an inadequately secured plug out of the socket. This results in undesired failure during operation that is also, to some extent, associated with considerable drawbacks.
The present invention relates to, in one embodiment among others, a connector for engagement with a corresponding complementary connector. The connector has a spring arm having a latch for engagement with the complementary connector. The spring arm also has an actuating arm that at least partially overlaps a locking arm of the spring arm in an actuating direction of the actuating arm. The actuating arm is longer than the locking arm.
The features and advantages of the invention will be explained in more detail in the description hereinafter with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
The locking arm 5 and the first and second arm portions 8, 9 of the actuating arm 6 are arranged on the common retaining portion 10 and are formed in one piece therewith. The locking arm 5 and the first and second arm portions 8, 9 are, in this case, moveable counter to one another.
The connector 1 further comprises a guard 11 that at least partially overlaps the actuator 7 in the actuating direction of the actuating arm 6. The guard 11 and the actuator 7 are each formed to be substantially arc-shaped in cross-section. A guard end face 12 of the guard 11 and an actuator end face 13 of the actuator 7 lie substantially in the same plane. Furthermore, the guard 11 comprises a substantially circular segment-shaped notch 14 recessed into the guard 11 from the guard end face 12.
The actuating arm 6 is longer than the locking arm 5 so the actuating arm 6 projects over the distal end of the locking arm. The actuator 7 overlaps a distal region of the locking arm 5 in the actuating direction of the actuating arm 6. Furthermore, the actuator 7 is set apart from the portion of the locking arm which is overlapped by the actuator 7. The guard 11 virtually completely overlaps the actuator 7. Only the circular segment-shaped notch 14 leaves a small region of the actuator 7 uncovered.
The above-described connector allows direct application of force at the locking arm 5 and thus also the possibility of the locking arm 5 being prevented from moving or being blocked during assembly by a person's finger. Further, direct force can be applied solely to the actuating arm. Still further, since the actuating arm 6 projects over the distal end of the locking arm 5, the locking arm 5 can be prevented from being actuated or can be blocked during assembly.
The actuator 7 is used to initiate separation of the connector 1 and the complementary connector 4. When the actuator 7 overlaps the locking arm 5 in the actuating direction of the actuating arm 6, intentional actuation of the actuator 7 is facilitated. When the actuator arm 6 comprises two arm portions, the mechanical stability of the actuating arm 6 is improved.
When the locking arm 5 and the actuating arm 6 are moveable counter to one another, the locking arm 5 may move while the actuating arm 6 remains unmoved.
When the actuator 7 is set apart from the portion of the locking arm 5 that is overlapped by the actuator 7, the likelihood of the locking arm 5 being unintentionally actuated by the actuating arm 6 is decreased while rattling noises caused by vibration are also decreased.
The guard 11 reduces the likelihood of damaging the spring arm 2 or unintentionally applying force to the spring arm 2. When the guard 11 is substantially arc-shaped in cross-section, stability is easily achieved.
When guard end face 12 of the guard 11 and an actuator end face 13 of the actuator 7 lie substantially in the same plane the actuator 7 does not project over the guard 11, avoiding unintentional actuation or damage of the actuator 7. Also, the guard 11 does not project over the actuator 7 in such a way that, during assembly, a larger effective contact surface is produced for inserting the connector 1 into a complementary connector 4. Consequently, the assembler's finger that is being used can, for example, be supported both at the actuator 7 and at the guard 11.
When the connector 1 comprises a polymer material, for example, a melt-processable plastic, construction of the connector 1 is cost-effective and can also be formed comparatively easily into complex shapes. Further, polymer materials are normally only very slightly electrically conductive which makes them suitable for insulative electrical connectors such as connector 1 and complementary connector 4.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 004 065 | Jan 2007 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5496190 | Ittah et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5711684 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
6116939 | Fukuda | Sep 2000 | A |
6132233 | Fukuda | Oct 2000 | A |
6146183 | Jinno et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6174190 | Tharp et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186819 | Holub | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6254418 | Tharp et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6447170 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6638096 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6692288 | Nimura | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6902420 | Muro et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935887 | Endo | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7156684 | Ichida et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160134 | Ichida et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7229306 | Mase et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7267569 | Nakamura | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7347710 | Ohtaka et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7402069 | Shigeta et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7402071 | Ohtaka et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20020037661 | Endo | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020111060 | Challis et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030003792 | Endo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040210 | Herlinger et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030087545 | Nimura | May 2003 | A1 |
20050082840 | Ichida et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060057881 | Ichida et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079110 | Ichida et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060134964 | Ohtaka et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070054536 | Nakamura | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054537 | Nakamura | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059968 | Ohtaka et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080153341 | Shigeta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080182448 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |