This disclosure relates to the field of nanotechnology and more particularly to the engineering of wireframe architectures and scaffolds using DNA structures.
Self-assembling nucleic acid molecules have shown merit as versatile materials for organizing and constructing complex nano-scale structures. Methods are known for generation of complex DNA origami nanostructures with addressable surface features. For example, a long scaffold strand, most often the 7429-nucleotide (nt) circular genome of the M13mp18 bacteriophage, is organized and folded by interactions with a large number of short, synthetic, staple strands. The path of the scaffold strand in this approach has been restricted to discrete domains of parallel lines because it is based on the double crossover unit motif to link adjacent helices.
Because engineering wireframe architectures and scaffolds of increasing complexity is an important challenge in nanotechology, methods and compositions for achieving same are very useful and inventive.
We present a design strategy that uses an unusual set of immobile Holliday junction analogs (four-arm junctions) as the basic structural unit of DNA origami nanostructures and as joints to construct a variety of two-dimensional (2D) and 3D gridiron structures, in which the scaffold strand and corresponding double helices are not restricted to a 1D parallel, raster-fill pattern. By programming the connection between individual joints with DNA segments of variable lengths, we constructed complex wireframe geometries.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent upon reference to the following detailed description and figures. To that end, any patent and other documents cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The patent application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
Although intuitively one could imagine threading a single-stranded scaffold through a number of four-arm junction units in both horizontal and vertical directions to create gridiron like patterns, the structural properties of traditional Holliday junction impose certain challenges that require unconventional rearrangement of the junction unit conformation, as revealed by the design principles described below.
We compared a gridiron unit to a double crossover motif (
Each of the four junctions is depicted in its relaxed conformation (
Connecting a number of gridiron units leads to the formation of a variety of 2D lattices (
The cavity size of gridiron structures can be tailored by altering the number of base pairs between the adjacent junction points. An 11-by-11 gridiron structure (11 vertical helices by 11 horizontal helices) with 21 base pairs (bp) between junctions in both directions uses 5301 of 7249 nt of the M13mp18 ssDNA scaffold strand and contains 120 staple strands (42 nt each). The remaining 1948 nt of the scaffold form a single-stranded loop at one corner that is visible in atomic force microscope (AFM,
To test whether the ssDNA scaffold is required to force the junction to rotate and form the intended gridiron structures, we designed and successfully constructed a scaffold-free 11-by-11 gridiron structure. We also found that scaffolded and scaffold-free gridiron elements can be combined within a single structure. Further, a scaffold-free gridiron unit was examined by native gel electrophoresis to verify its formation when the component strands were mixed in equal stoichiometric ratios. Although the schematic diagram in
The flexibility of the joints makes it possible to control or reconfigure the conformation of the gridiron structure by exerting external forces on selected corners of a gridiron. A modified version of a 15-by-15 gridiron structure with 21-bp cavities has about one quadrant of the gridiron unfolded and forms a randomly coiled 836-nt single-stranded loop between two “arms” of tweezers (
We could contract and extend the ssDNA loop by introducing secondary or tertiary structures that generate enough force to control the angle. Sets of staple strands were designed to either contract the ssDNA loop and fix an acute angle (a narrow distribution centered at 41° T7°) via the formation of a two-helix bundle (
We extended the gridiron design into the third dimension by three different strategies. The first involves stacking multiple layers of 2D gridiron lattices at selected connection points (
Varying the location and distance between connection points will yield differently patterned multilayer structures. In contrast to the angle flexibility present in the quasi-2D structures, the addition of a third layer fixes the angles at junction points. The only exception to this is for connections through the center of the same unit motif, as shown by the green dashed line (
The relations of the lattice planes in gridiron structures are not restricted to stacked multilayer structures. The 3D gridiron structures can also be assembled by integrating gridiron lattices with scaffold-free elements.
Gridiron designs can allow assembly of even more complex structures by inducing a desired curvature in the basic structural unit described in nonparallel helices. The relation between adjacent linear helices (the angles formed by their theoretical intersection) between adjacent linear helices was varied. Some 3D gridiron structures that contain curvature were also achieved, such as the sphere shown in
The design principles of creating gridiron units allow scaffold strands to travel in multiple directions, which represent an important departure from certain aspects of the previous DNA origami methods. Traditional Holliday junctions do not naturally adopt conformations that would allow them to be connected in such a way, and it was unexpected to find that these motifs could (within a larger network of crossovers) endure a 150° rotation of one of the arms while simultaneously maintaining their integrity. Indeed, the flexible and dynamic behavior of these motifs may have excluded these types of junction conformations for consideration in scaffolded structures. Yield analysis from agarose gel and TEM images shows that the structures, even without purification, form with reasonably high yield (from ˜36% for the gridiron tweezers to ˜85% for the gridiron screw, estimated from agarose gels; from ˜51% for the gridiron sphere to ˜89% for the four-layer gridiron, estimated from TEM images; see supplementary materials for yield analysis). The ability to engineer DNA gridirons that are analogous to vector-based objects, where a series of points with defined positions in 3D space are connected by lines, is an important milestone in the development of synthetic nucleic acid structures. In particular, this opens up new opportunities to implement the design of complex wireframe structures that are amenable to dynamic controls. A future challenge in DNA origami is to achieve true folding, starting from a 2D sheet (miura ori), rather than the 1D M13 scaffolds commonly used in traditional DNA origami construction. The loose 2D networks and freely rotating hinges between different planes of DNA gridirons provide the design features necessary to implement Miura ori type of origami.
It should be understood that these Examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these following Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various uses and conditions.
Materials and Methods
All staple strands were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies Inc. (www.IDTDNA.com) in the format of 96-well plates at a 25 nmole synthesis scale. All the strands were normalized to 200 μM×100 μL and were used without further purification. M13mp18 single stranded DNA was purchased from New England Biolabs (NEB, Catalog number: # N4040S) and was used as received.
Assembly of 2D and 3D DNA nanostructures. The design and sequences of the DNA oligos used to form a particular structure are listed below. For each design, 10 nM of single stranded M13mp18 DNA (7,249 nucleotides) was mixed with a 10 times molar excess of staple strands in TAE Mg2+ buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM Acetic acid, 2 mM EDTA and 12.5 mM Magnesium acetate, pH 8.0). The resulting solutions were annealed from 95° C. to 4° C. to form the designed structures. The exact temperature steps for the slow anneal are as follows: 94 to 86° C. at 4° C. per 5 minutes; 85 to 70° C. at 1° C. per 5 minutes; 70 to 40° C. at 1° C. per 15 minutes; 40 to 25° C. at 1° C. per 10 minutes. The exact temperature steps for the fast anneal are as follows: 90 to 76° C. at 2° C. per 5 minutes; 76 to 24° C. at 4° C. per 5 minutes. All structures form in both anneal protocols. All samples are then subjected to AFM imaging and TEM imaging without further purification.
AFM imaging. For AFM imaging, the sample (2 L) was deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica surface (Ted Pella, Inc.) and left to adsorb for 2 min. 50 L buffer (1×TAE-Mg2+, plus 2 L 100 mM NiCl2) was added onto the mica, and the sample was scanned on a Veeco 8 AFM in the Scanasyst in Fluid mode using scanasyst in fluid+ tips (Veeco, Inc.).
TEM imaging: TEM samples were prepared by dropping 2 μL of the sample solution on a carbon-coated grid (400 mesh, Ted Pella). Before depositing the sample, the grids were negatively glow discharged (Emitech K100X). After 1 minute, the excess sample was wicked away from the grid with a piece of filter paper. To remove the excess salt, the grid was washed with a drop of nanopure water and the excess water was wicked away with filter paper. For staining, the grid was treated with a drop of 0.7% uranyl formate solution and the excess solution was removed with filter paper. The grid was treated with a second drop of uranyl formate solution for 20 seconds, and the excess solution was removed with filter paper. The grid was subsequently held at room temperature in air to evaporate the excess solution. TEM studies were conducted with a Philips CM12 transmission electron microscope, operated at 80 kV in bright field mode.
Agarose Gel electrophoresis: The folding products were subject to native gel electrophoresis on 0.75% agarose gel (1×TAE-Mg2+, preloaded in the gel with 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide) at 75-80 V for two to three hours and the gels were visualized under UV light.
Page Gel electrophoresis: The folding products were subject to native gel electrophoresis on 6% Native PAGE gel (polyacrymide; 1×TAE-Mg2+) at 200V for 2 hours at 20 degree and the gels were visualized under UV light.
Design details and sequences of assembled structures. “Tiamat” software was used to design all DNA Gridiron structures. Tiamat is a basic DNA drawing software program (similar programs also exist) and no special algorithms were used to design the DNA Gridiron structures. Most of the design tasks were performed manually and Tiamat was primarily used to generate staple strands sequences according to the scaffold strand sequence.
skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=2416F4B1C095AF65!152&authkey=!AELrUerdPdo1P1w.
The claims are not intended to be limited to the embodiments and examples described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/121,007, filed on Aug. 23, 2016, which is a national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/017553, filed on Feb. 25, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/944,677 filed on Feb. 26, 2014.
This invention was made with government support under N000140911118 awarded by the Office of Naval Research, 1104373 awarded by the National Science Foundation, and W911NF-11-1-0137 awarded by the Army Research Office. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4469863 | Ts'o et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4559157 | Smith et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4608392 | Jacquet et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4612302 | Szabo et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4684620 | Hruby et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4816567 | Cabilly et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4820508 | Wortzman | Apr 1989 | A |
4853371 | Coy et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4873192 | Kunkel | Oct 1989 | A |
4938949 | Borch et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5023243 | Tullis | Jan 1991 | A |
4992478 | Geria | Feb 1991 | A |
6239116 | Krieg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
20070082352 | Cumpson | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080124366 | Ohlfest et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20110275702 | Chang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120190732 | Chang et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20150004193 | Chang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2010060030 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2013119676 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Agrawal et al., (1988). “Oligodeoxynucleoside phophoramidates and phosphorrothioates as inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 7079-7083. |
Agrawal et al., (1992). “Antisense oligonucleotides as antiviral agents.” Trends in Biotechnology 10: 152-158. |
Bachmann et al., (2010). “Vaccine delivery: a matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns.” Natural Reviews Immunology 10:787-796. |
Ballas et al., (1996). “Induction of NK Activity in Murine and Human Cells by CpG Motifs in Oligodeoxynucleotides and Bacterial DNA.” J. lmmunol. 157(5): 1840-1845. |
Beaucage et al., (1981). “Deoxynucleoside Phosphoramidites—A New Class of Key Intermediates for Deoxypolynucleotide Synthesis.” Tetrahedron Letters 22(20): 1859-1862. |
Bode et al., (2011). “CpG DNA as a vaccine adjuvant.” Expert Rev. Vaccines 10(4 ): 499-511. |
Burton, (2010). “Scaffolding to build a rational vaccine design strategy.” PNAS 107(42): 17859-17860. |
Cao and Chen, “Characterization of Antibody Responses Against the 2F5 Epitope ELDKWA Using HIV-1 Env-Mediated Membrane Fusion and Neutralization Assays.” Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2010; 15(4): 447-451. |
Clackson et al., (1991). “Making antibody fragments using phage display libraries.” Nature 352: 624-628. |
Cowdrey et al., (1996). “Bacterial DNA Induces NK Cells to Produce IFN-gamma In Vivo and Increases the Toxicity of Lipopolysaccharides.” The Journal of Immunology 156(12): 4570-4575. |
Dayhoff et al., (1978). “A Model of Evolutionary Change in Proteins.” Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure 345-352. |
Dietz H. et al., “Folding DNA into Twisted and Curved Nanoscale Shapes”, Science 325(5941), 725-730 (2009). |
Douglas S. et al., “Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes”, Nature 459, 414-418 (2009). |
Elgueta et al., (2010). “The immortality of humeral immunity.” Immunological Reviews 236: 139-150. |
Froehler et al., (1986). “Deoxyncleoside H-Phosphonate diester intermediates in the synthesis of internucleotide phosphate analogues.” Tetrahedron Letters 27(46): 5575-5578. |
Froehler et al., (1986). “Synthesis of DNA via deoxynucleoside H-phosphonate intermediates.” Nucleic Acids Research 14( 13 ): 5399-5407. |
Fu T. et al., “DNA Double-Crossover Molecules”, Biochemistry 32(13), 3211-3220 (1993). |
Gaffney et al., (1988). “Large-scale oligonucleotide synthesis by the H-phosphonate method.” Tetrahedron Letters 29(22): 2619-2622. |
Garegg et al., (1986). “Nucleoside H-Phosphonates. III. Chemical synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotides by the hydrogenphophonate approach.” Tetrahedron Letters 27(34): 4051-4054. |
Garegg et al., (1986). “Nucleoside H-phosphonates. IV. Automated solid phase synthesis of oligoribonucleotides by the hydrogenphosphonate approach.” Tetrahedron Letters 27(34): 4055-4058. |
Gietl A. et al., “DNA origami as biocompatible surface to match single-molecule and ensemble experiments”, Nucleic Acids Res 40(14), e110 (2012), 10 pages. |
Goodchild (1990). “Conjugates of oligonucleotides and modified oligonucleotides: a review of their synthesis and properties.” Bioconjugate Chemistry 1 (3): 165-187. |
Han D. et al., “DNA gridiron nanostructures based on four-arm junctions”, Science 339(6126), 1412-1415 (2013). |
Han et al., (2011). “DNA Origami with Complex Curvatures in Three-Dimensional Space.” Science 332(6027): 342-346. |
He et al., (2008). “Hierarchical self-assembly of DNA into symmetric supramolecular polyhedral.” Nature 452: 198-202. |
Hosmalin et al. Priming With T Helper Cell Epitope Peptides Enhances the Antibody Response to the Envelope Glycoprotein of HIV-1 in Primates. J. lmmunol. 1991; 146(5): 1667-1673. |
Jerala M. et al., “A DNA Origami of Slovenia in Nano Dimensions”, Acta Chim Slav 58(1), 181-184 (2011). |
Ke et al., (2008). “Self-Assembled Water-Soluble Nucleic Acid Probe Tiles for Label-Free RNA Hybridization Assays.” Science 319: 180-183. |
Kohler et al., (1975). “Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity.” Nature 256:495-497. |
Krieg et al., (1995). “CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation.” Nature 374(6522): 546-549. |
Kunkel et al., (1987). “Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.” Methods in Enzymology 154: 367-382. |
Kunkel, (1985). “Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 488-492. |
Kutsch et al., (2002). “Direct and Quantitative Single-Cell Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reactivation from Latency.” J Viral. 76(17): 8776-8786. |
Li et al., (2011). “Self-Assembled Multivalent DNA Nanostructures for Noninvasive Intracellular Delivery of lmmunostimulator CpG Oligonucleotides.” ACS Nano 5(11 ): 8783-8789. |
Liu et al., (2011). “Targeted Cell-Cell Interactions by DNA Nanoscaffold-Templated Multivalent Bispecific Aptamers.” Small 7(12): 1673-1682. |
Liu et al., (2012). “A DNA Nanostructure Platform for Directed Assembly of Synthetic Vaccines.” Nano Letters 12: 4254-4259. |
Lu et al., (2010). “Polyvalent AIDS Vaccines.” Current HIV Research 8(8): 622-629. |
Mao C. et al., “Designed Two-Dimensional DNA Holliday Junction Arrays Visualized by Atomic Force Microscopy”, J l\m Chem Soc 121(23), 5437-5443 (1999). |
Marini M. et al., “A Revertible, Autonomous, Self-Assembled DNA-Origami Nanoactuator”, Nano Lett 11(12), 5449-5454 (2011). |
Marks et al., (1991). “By-passing immunization: Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage.” Journal of Molecular Biology 222(3): 581-597. |
Marks et al., (1992). “By-Passing Immunization: Building High Affinity Human Antibodies by Chain Shuffling.” Bio/ Technology 10: 779-783. |
McCafferty et al., (1990). “Phage antibodies: filamentous phage displaying antibody variable domains.” Nature 348: 552-554. |
McElrath et al., (2010) “Induction of Immunity to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 by Vaccination.” Immunity 33(4): 542-554. |
McGhee et al., (1993). “New Perspectives in Mucosal Immunity With Emphasis on Vaccine Development,” Sem. Hematol., 30(4): 3-15. |
McKinney S. et al., “Structural dynamics of individual Holliday junctions”, Nature Struct Biol 10(2), 93-97 (2002). |
Miick S. et al., “Crossover isomer bias is the primary sequence-dependent property of immobilized Holliday junctions” Proc Nall Acad Sci USA 94(17), 9080-9084 (1997). |
Morrison et al., (1984). “Chimeric human antibody molecules: Mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81: 6851-6855. |
Moses et al., (2007). “The growing applications of click chemistry.” Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007 36(8): 1249-62. |
Mouquet et al., (2010). “Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation.” Nature 467: 591-596. |
Ofek et al., (2010). “Elicitation of Structure-Specific Antibodies by Epitope Scaffolds.” PNAS 107(42): 17880-17887. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Authority, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US15/17553, 16 pages, dated Jun. 17, 2015. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Searching Authority, Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/ US2013/24945, 9 pages, dated May 20, 2013. |
Roberts et al., (2011). “B cells do not take up bacterial DNA: an essential role for antigen in exposure of DNA to toll-like receptor-9 ” Immunology & Cell Biology 89(4): 517-525. |
Rostovtsev et al., (2002). “A Stepwise Huisgen Cycloaddition Process: Copper (1)-Catalyzed Regioselective ‘Ligation’ of Azides and Terminal Alkynes.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41(14): 2596-2599. |
Rothemund W., “Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns”, Nature 440, 297-302 (2006). |
Seeman N., “Nanomaterials Based on DNA”, Annu Rev Biochem 79, 65-87 (2010). |
Seeman, (2003). “At the Crossroads of Chemistry, Biology, and Materials: Structural DNA Nanotechnology.” Chemistry & Biology 10: 1151-1159. |
Uhlmann et al., (1990). “Antisense Oligonucleotides: A New Therapeutic Principle.” Chemical Reviews 90(4). |
Van Duyne et al., (2009). “The utilization of humanized mouse models for the study of human retroviral infections.” Retrovirology 6: 76. |
Waterhouse et al., (1993). “Combinatorial infection and in vivo recombination: a strategy for making large phage antibody repertoires.” Nucleic Acids Research 21 (9): 2265-2266. |
Zhang et al., (2010). “Exterior Modification of a DNA Tetrahedron.” Chem Commun. 46: 6792-6794. |
Zhao et al., (2010). “A Route to Scale up DNA Origami using DNA Tiles as Folding Staples.” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49: 1414-1417. |
Zhao Z et al., “Organizing DNA Origami Tiles Into Larger Structures Using Preformed Scaffold Frames”, Nano Lett 11 (7), 2997-3002 (2011). |
Zolla-Pazner “Identifying Epitopes of HIV-1 That Induce Protective Antibodies”. Nat. Rev. lmmunol. 2004; 4:199-210. |
Zolnik et al. “Minireview: Nanoparticles and the Immune System.” Endocrinol. 2010; 151 (2): 458-465. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190144491 A1 | May 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61944677 | Feb 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15121007 | US | |
Child | 16202841 | US |