Generally described, computing devices and communication networks can be utilized to exchange information. In a common application, a computing device can request content from another computing device via the communication network. For example, a user at a personal computing device can utilize a software browser application to request a Web page from a server computing device via the Internet. In such embodiments, the user computing device can be referred to as a client computing device and the server computing device can be referred to as a content provider.
Content providers are generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. For larger scale implementations, a content provider may receive content requests from a high volume of client computing devices which can place a strain on the content provider's computing resources. Additionally, the content requested by the client computing devices may have a number of components, which can further place additional strain on the content provider's computing resources.
With reference to an illustrative example, a requested Web page, or original content, may be associated with a number of additional resources, such as images or videos, that are to be displayed with the Web page. In one specific embodiment, the additional resources of the Web page are identified by a number of embedded resource identifiers, such as uniform resource locators (“URLs”). In turn, software on the client computing devices typically processes embedded resource identifiers to generate requests for the content. Often, the resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources reference a computing device associated with the content provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced content provider computing device. Accordingly, in order to satisfy a content request, the content provider(s) (or any service provider on behalf of the content provider(s)) would provide client computing devices data associated with the Web page as well as the data associated with the embedded resources.
Some content providers attempt to facilitate the delivery of requested content, such as Web pages and/or resources identified in Web pages, through the utilization of a network storage provider or a content delivery network (“CDN”) service provider. A network storage provider and a CDN service provider each typically maintains a number of computing devices in a communication network that can maintain content from various content providers. In turn, content providers can instruct, or otherwise suggest to, client computing devices to request some, or all, of the content provider's content from the network storage provider's or CDN service provider's computing devices. Upon receipt of resource requests from such client computing devices, a CDN service provider also typically delivers the requested resource in accordance with terms (such as via a service plan) specified between a corresponding content provider and the CDN service provider.
With reference to previous illustrative example, the content provider can leverage a network storage provider or CDN service provider with the modification or substitution of resource identifiers associated with the embedded resources. Specifically, the resource identifiers can reference a computing device associated with the network storage provider or CDN service provider such that the client computing device would transmit the request for the additional resources to the referenced network storage provider or CDN service provider computing device. Typically, the content provider facilitates the utilization of a network storage provider or CDN provider by including network storage provider or CDN-provider specific resource identifiers in requested content (e.g., Web pages).
As with content providers, network storage providers and CDN service providers are also generally motivated to provide requested content to client computing devices often with consideration of efficient transmission of the requested content to the client computing device and/or consideration of a cost associated with the transmission of the content. Accordingly, such service providers often consider factors such as latency of delivery of requested content in order to meet service level agreements or to generally improve the quality of delivery service.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Generally described, the present disclosure is directed to routing of a DNS query from a client computing device to a network computing component via an application broker for processing requested content associated with the DNS query. Specifically, aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to the routing of a client computing device DNS query as a function of application information associated with resources requested by the client computing device. In certain embodiments, application information may be exclusively included within the resource identifiers utilized in the DNS queries received by the application broker from the client computing device. In other embodiments, the DNS queries may include information that permits the application broker to retrieve application information (or additional application information) associated with the requested resources. In any case, upon determining the application information for the requested resources, the application broker may select network computing components on the basis of this application information to process resource requests from client computing devices. Alternatively, the application broker may select an alternative resource identifier based on the application information. Although various aspects of the disclosure will be described with regard to illustrative examples and embodiments, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the disclosed embodiments and examples should not be construed as limiting.
Although not illustrated in
The content delivery environment 100 can also include a content provider 104 in communication with the one or more client computing devices 102 via the communication network 108. The content provider 104 illustrated in
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the content provider 104 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, DNS nameservers, and the like. For example, although not illustrated in
With continued reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, the DNS component 122 and resource cache component 124 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the CDN POPs 120 are illustrated in
With further continued reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, NCCs 136, 144, 150 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the NCC POPs 134, 142, 148 are illustrated in
With further continued reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, the storage components 140, 144, 148 are considered to be logically grouped, regardless of whether the components, or portions of the components, are physically separate. Additionally, although the NSP POPs 138, 142, 146 are illustrated in
With further continued reference to
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the application broker 111 can be associated with various additional computing resources, such additional computing devices for administration of content and resources, DNS nameservers, and the like. For example, as further illustrated in
Even further, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the components of the network storage provider 110, the network computing provider 107, the CDN service provider 106, and the application broker 111 can be managed by the same or different entities. One skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that the components and configurations provided in
With reference now to
With reference to
One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that upon registration of content with the application broker 111, the content provider 104 can begin to direct requests for content from client computing devices 102 to the application broker 111. Specifically, in accordance with DNS routing principles, and as will be described in further detail below, a client computing device request corresponding to a resource identifier would eventually be directed toward a NCC 136, 144, 150 associated with a network computing provider 107.
With continued reference to
In one embodiment, the application broker 111 returns an identification of applicable domains for the application broker (unless it has been previously provided) and any additional information to the content provider 104. In turn, the content provider 104 can then process the stored content with the application broker specified information. In one example, as illustrated in
Generally, the identification of the resources originally directed to the content provider 104 will be in the form of a resource identifier that can be processed by the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application. In an illustrative embodiment, the resource identifiers can be in the form of a uniform resource locator (“URL”). Because the resource identifiers are included in the requested content directed to the content provider, the resource identifiers can be referred to generally as the “content provider URL.” For purposes of an illustrative example, the content provider URL can identify a domain of the content provider 104 (e.g., contentprovider.com), a name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and a path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). In this illustrative example, the content provider URL has the form of:
During an illustrative modification process, the content provider URL is modified such that requests for the resources associated with the modified URLs resolve to the application broker 111. In one embodiment, the modified URL identifies the domain of the application broker 111 (e.g., “applicationbroker.com”), the same name of the resource to be requested (e.g., “resource.xxx”) and the same path where the resource will be found (e.g., “path”). Additionally, the modified URL can include various additional pieces of information utilized by the application broker 111 during the request routing process. Specifically, in an illustrative embodiment, the modified URL can include an application identifier and/or data otherwise corresponding to application information or criteria utilized by the application broker 111 during the request routing process (hereinafter collectively referred to as “application information”). Accordingly, as similarly described above, the application information can include, but is not limited to, client identifiers, content provider identifiers, file type identifiers, application identifiers, and the like. In one example, the application information can correspond to a file type identifier that can thereafter be used by the application broker 111, such as via a lookup, to determine information regarding an application for use in processing the requested resource.
In a further illustrative embodiment, the application broker 111 can use the application information from the URL alone or together with yet other additional information or requirements for use in selecting an instance of an application for processing requested content or selecting a domain of a network computing provider that may be authoritative to resolve the resource request. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the name information and the path information is not accessible to a DNS nameserver as a part of DNS query processing. The portion of the URL including the domain and any preceding information, on the other hand, is generally referred to as the “DNS portion” of the URL.
Additionally, the modified URL can include any additional processing information (e.g., “additional information”) utilized by the application broker 111 during the request routing, including, but not limited to, content provider IDs, service plan information, file identifiers, and the like. For example, where the application information corresponds to an application identifier, the additional information may include a file identifier or service plan information. The modified URL would have the form of:
In another embodiment, the information associated with the application broker 111 is included in a modified URL, such as through prepending or other techniques, such that the modified URL can maintain all of the information associated with the original URL. In this embodiment, the modified URL would have the form of:
In both of the above examples, the application information and the additional information are separated as separate labels in the modified URL. One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the application information and any additional information can be combined together in a single label of the modified URL. It will also be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that, rather than including the additional application information in the modified URL, the additional application information may be otherwise made available to the application broker and/or any DNS server in the routing process.
With reference now to
Upon receipt of the content request, the content provider 104 identifies the appropriate responsive content. In an illustrative embodiment, the requested content can correspond to a Web page that is displayed on the client computing device 102 via the processing of information, such as hypertext markup language (“HTML”), extensible markup language (“XML”), and the like. The requested content can also include a number of embedded resource identifiers, described above, that corresponds to resource objects that should be obtained by the client computing device 102 as part of the processing of the requested content.
Upon receipt of the requested content, the client computing device 102, such as through a browser software application, begins processing any of the markup code included in the content and attempts to acquire the resources identified by the embedded resource identifiers. Accordingly, the first step in acquiring the content corresponds to the issuance, by the client computing device 102 (through its local DNS resolver), of a DNS query for the original URL resource identifier that results in the identification of a DNS server authoritative to the “.” and the “com” portions of the translated URL. After resolving the “.” and “com” portions of the embedded URL, the client computing device 102 then issues a DNS query for the resource URL that results in the identification of a DNS nameserver authoritative to the “.applicationbroker” portion of the embedded URL. The issuance of DNS queries corresponding to the “.” and the “com” portions of a URL are well known and have not been illustrated.
With reference now to
With continued reference to
As will be described further below, in one embodiment, the application broker 111 utilizes application information, at least in part, to identify the particular instance of a NCC (and its associated IP address). In one illustrative embodiment, the application broker 111 can use the application information and any additional information in the DNS portion of the resource identifier (which is used to resolve the DNS query), or otherwise determined by the application broker 111, to return an IP address of an instance of a NCC. As similarly described above, the application information can include, without limitation, an application identifier including information pertaining to a type of hosted application for processing the requested content or a specific instance of a hosted application desired for processing the requested content, file type identifiers which can include file type information for use by the application broker in determining the appropriate type or instance of a hosted application for processing the requested content, or other client or content provider identification codes which can be used by the application broker in determining the appropriate type or instance of a hosted application for processing the requested content, and the like.
In one example, as will be further described below, where the requested content corresponds to a streaming media file, for example, the application broker 111 can use application information included in a DNS portion of the first resource identifier to select an instance of a NCC for processing the streaming media file. In one embodiment, the application information can specify file type information for the content to be processed, and the application broker 111 selects an instance of a NCC that has a data streaming application capable of processing a request for the identified file type, e.g., an MPEG or Flash media file. In another embodiment, the application information can specify a type of hosted application, e.g., an Adobe Flash server streaming application or a Real Network Helix server streaming application, to be used to process the requested content. Based on that information, the application broker 111 resolves the DNS query by identifying an instance of a NCC that corresponds to the identified type of application for processing the requested content or that can dynamically cause creation of such an instance. Still further, in another embodiment, the application information can specify a specific instance of an application, e.g., Company's Flash server, specified by a content provider for example. Based on that information, the application broker 111 then resolves the DNS query by identifying the IP address of a specific instance of a NCC that has the application required to process the requested content. Yet further, in another embodiment, the DNS portion of the first resource identifier can have a separate file type identifier which provides the file type information for use by the application broker 111 in selecting an appropriate instance of a NCC device for servicing the requested content.
Even further, the application broker 111 can also use information obtained directly from a client computing device (such as information provided by the client computing device or ISP) or indirectly (such as inferred through a client computing device's IP address) to determine an instance of a NCC. Such client computing device information can, for example, be geographic information. As will be described further below, this client computing device information together with the application information can be used to select an instance of a NCC as a function of the client computing device location. For example, in order to reduce latency and improve performance, the application broker 111 may select an instance of a NCC close to the requesting client computing device for processing a content request such as one requiring use of a streaming media application. The IP address selected by a DNS nameserver component of the application broker 111 may correspond to a specific instance of a NCC. Alternatively, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer) at a specific NCC POP for selecting a specific instance of a NCC.
Still further, for selection of an instance of a NCC, the application broker 111 can utilize additional selection information provided in the DNS portion of the resource identifier (which is used to resolve the DNS query) and/or from network computing provider 107 to the application broker 111. It will also be appreciated that the additional selection information may also be otherwise determined and/or maintained by the application broker 111. Such selection information can include information typically related to quality of service, such as computing capacity measurements of NCCs, compression rates, processing power, processing speed, bandwidth, and the like, which can be indirectly related to the cost associated with creating and/or using a particular instance of a NCC. In one embodiment, this additional selection information can be provided over a communication channel between the network computing provider 107 and the application broker 111, as generally illustrated in
Continuing with reference to
In an illustrative embodiment, the alternative resource identifiers are in the form of one or more canonical name (“CNAME”) records. In one embodiment, each CNAME record identifies a domain of the network computing provider (e.g., “computingprovider.com” or “computingprovider-1.com”). As will be explained in greater detail below, the domain in the CNAME does not need to be the same domain found in original URL or in a previous CNAME record. In a manner similar to the information described above, each CNAME record includes the same or different application and/or additional information utilized by a receiving DNS nameserver for processing the DNS query.
In an illustrative embodiment, the application information included in the CNAME can be the same application information provided in the modified URL or additional/alternative application information obtained by the application broker 111. For example, the application information included in the CNAME can correspond to application information otherwise obtained by the application broker (directly or indirectly). As also described above, the CNAME can also include additional request routing information, (e.g., “request routing information”) utilized by the application broker 111. An illustrative CNAME record can have the form of:
In an illustrative embodiment, the CNAME records are generated and provided by the one or more DNS servers of the application broker 111 to direct a more appropriate DNS nameserver (or group of DNS nameservers) of a network computing provider, such as the network computing provider 107. As used in accordance with the present disclosure, appropriateness can be defined in any manner by the application broker 111 for a variety of purposes.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In one example, the application broker 111 may determine that requests for resources utilizing applications which receive more data from a client computing device than delivered to the client computing device should be handled by one or more NCCs positioned relatively close to the client computing device 102. One or more NCCs may be positioned at the edges of the communications network to which the client computing devices 102 are connected. Depending upon the location of a client computing device 102, some NCCs may be closer to the client computing device than others. In this context, closeness may include, but is not limited to, geographical proximity, network topology, and the like. Accordingly, the application broker 111 resolves the DNS query by selecting one or more NCCs of a network computing provider 107 closer to the client computing device 102. Accordingly, for applications which receive more data from clients than delivered out, utilizing applications at NCCs close to the clients can result in reduced latency and higher service quality. These types of applications are considered data sinks. Accordingly, in this embodiment, by providing a hosting environment for such applications that allow data from the client to be received faster through the selection of one or more NCCs close to the client computing device, overall performance can be improved.
In another example, the application broker 111 may determine that requests for resources utilizing applications which deliver more data to a client computing device than received by the application from the client computing device and which are computationally intensive should also be handled by one or more NCCs positioned relatively close to the client computing device 102. In this context, computational intensity can correspond to applications having a high processing to data source access ratio, e.g., a ratio greater than 1 or exceeding some other threshold value. By moving data delivery and processing of these types of applications closer to the client computing device, and thus the edge of the network, through selection of appropriate NCCs, the application broker 111 can distribute requests to NCCs having a higher resource availability. Accordingly, latency due to insufficient computing resources may be reduced.
In a further example, the application broker 111 may determine that requests for resources utilizing applications which are less computationally intensive and more database intensive should alternatively be handled by one or more NCCs that are close to the data source. In this context, these types of applications can correspond to applications having a processing to data source access ratio that fails to exceed a threshold, e.g., those resulting in a ratio of less than or equal to 1. Additionally, closeness may again include, but is not limited to, geographical proximity, network topology, and the like. In these instances, the application broker 111 resolves the DNS query by selecting one or more NCCs that are close to the data source. The data source may correspond, for example, to the origin server component 114 and associated storage component 116 of the content provider 104 or to a third party storage component used on behalf of the content provider 104, such as storage components 140, 144, 148 of network storage provider 110. As a result of routing this type of application in such a manner, the application broker 111 facilitates higher service quality and reduced latency in the request routing process.
As described above, in addition to the consideration of application information, the application broker 111 and/or subsequent processing components, such as components at the network computing provider 107, can utilize additional information (e.g., the “additional information”) included in the modified URL, or otherwise determined, to select a more appropriate NCC. In one aspect, the application broker 111 can utilize the additional information to select from a set of DNS nameservers identified as satisfying routing criteria including, but not limited to, financial cost to content provider 104, network performance (e.g., “internet weather”), service level criteria, resource popularity, application availability, data availability, observed behavior, etc. In another aspect, the application broker 111 can utilize the additional information to validate the NCC selected in accordance with the application information or to select an alternative DNS nameserver (or group of DNS nameservers) previously selected in accordance with the application information. In still another aspect, the application broker 111 can utilize the additional information to select a set of potentially applicable NCCs (e.g., meeting minimum service levels) and then utilize the application information to prioritize from the set of potentially applicable NCCs.
In one example, the application broker 111 can additionally attempt to direct a DNS query to DNS nameservers or resolve the DNS query to a NCC according to network performance criteria. The network performance criteria can correspond to measurements of network performance for transmitting data from the network computing provider NCCs to the client computing device 102. Examples of network performance metrics can include network data transfer latencies (measured by the client computing device or the application broker 111, network data error rates, and the like.
In another example, the application broker 111 can additionally attempt to direct a DNS query to a DNS nameserver associated with a network computing provider or resolve the DNS query to a NCC according to service level criteria. The service level criteria can correspond to service or performance metrics contracted between the application broker 111 and the content provider 104. Examples of performance metrics can include latencies of data transmission between the network computing provider's POPs and the client computing devices 102, total data provided on behalf of the content provider 104 by the network computing provider's POPs, error rates for data transmissions, and the like.
In yet another example, the application broker 111 can additionally attempt to direct a DNS query to a DNS nameserver associated with a network computing provider or resolve the DNS query to a NCC according to observed behaviors. In particular, the application broker 111 can monitor past performance of the network computing provider 107 and/or NCCs of the network computing provider 107 to determine whether modifications should be made in the routing of future resource requests. It will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art that a variety of logic may be implemented to monitor such behavior and to update routing information based thereon.
In yet another example, the application broker 111 can attempt to direct a DNS query to a DNS nameserver associated with a network computing provider or resolve the DNS query to a NCC according to selection information criteria provided by the network computing provider 107. As similarly set forth above, such selection information can include information typically related to quality of service, such as computing capacity measurements of NCCs, compression rates, processing power, processing speed, bandwidth, and the like, which can be indirectly related to the cost associated with creating and/or using a particular instance of a NCC. This selection information can be provided over a communication channel between the network computing provider 107 and the application broker 111 at a variety of times. Moreover, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the relevant art, the selection information may be transmitted in any of a number of ways, such as upon individual requests from the application broker 111, batch processing initiated by the application broker or network computing provider, and the like.
In still another example, the application broker 111 can additionally attempt to direct a DNS query to a DNS server associated with a network computing provider or resolve the DNS query to a NCC according to cost information. The cost information can correspond to a financial cost attributable to the content provider 104 for the delivery of resources by the network computing provider 107. The financial cost may be defined in a variety of ways and can be obtained by the AM component 152 of the application broker 111, or by a management component of the network computing provider, in a variety of ways.
In another embodiment, the cost information may designate that the content provider 104 has requested that the AM component 152 of the application broker 111 select the NCC associated with the lowest current financial cost to provide the requested resource. Accordingly, the AM component 152 of the application broker 111 could obtain cost information for at least a portion of the NCCs and select the NCC of the network computing provider associated with the lowest financial cost. The financial cost information utilized to select the lowest financial costs may be based on a current financial costs or projected financial costs. The projected financial costs can be based on criteria, such as time of day, characteristics of the resource (e.g., size of the data, type of data, type of application required to provide the data, etc.), anticipated data throughput volumes, current loads experienced by each NCC, and the like. For example, if a network computing provider's NCC resources are at an optimal capacity, the network computing provider may project financial cost at a premium cost level (e.g., a highest cost level) because any additional data traffic would cause the resources to operate above optimal rates. Conversely, the network computing provider 107 may project lower financial costs for specific NCCs according to historically known low volume times (e.g., time of day, days of the month, time of the year, special days/holidays, etc.). The financial cost information may be a single cost projected for each identifiable network computing provider. Alternatively, the financial cost information may be a set of costs associated with one or more identifiable components of each network computing provider (e.g., financial information for one or more NCCs associated with a network computing provider).
In yet another embodiment, the cost information may designate that the content provider 104 has requested that the cost associated with providing the requested resource be maintained below one or more cost thresholds or cost tiers. Accordingly, the AM component 152 of the application broker 111 could obtain financial cost information for the available NCCs and select only those NCCs with a financial cost at or below the cost thresholds. The AM component 152 of the application broker 111 could then utilize other request routing criteria to select from the selected DNS nameservers (if more than one DNS nameserver is identified) or selected in accordance with other selections methodologies (e.g., random, round robin, etc.).
In still another embodiment, the AM component 152 of the application broker 111 can utilize a determined/projected volume of request information for selecting a network computing provider, a specific DNS nameserver associated with one or more NCCs of the network computing provider, and/or a NCC of a specific provider (such as the network computing provider 107 or any other provider providing NCCs). The determined/projected volume of request information can include the total number of requests obtained by the application broker 111 for a resource over a defined period of time, trends regarding an increase/decrease in requests for the resource, and various combinations or alternatives thereof.
In a yet further embodiment, the AM component 152 of the application broker 111 can additionally utilize other content provider specified criteria for selecting a domain associated with a network computing provider and/or a specific NCC of a network computing provider. The content provider specified criteria can correspond to a variety of measurements or metrics specified by the content provider 104 and related to the delivery of resources on behalf of the content provider. The measurements or metrics can include content provider specified quality metrics (e.g., error rates), user complaints or error reports, and the like.
In accordance with a specific illustrative embodiment regarding selection of a domain of a network computing provider, the application broker 111 maintains a data store that defines CNAME records for various URLs corresponding to embedded resources. If a DNS query corresponding to a particular URL matches an entry in the data store, the application broker 111 returns a CNAME record to the client computing device 102 as defined in the data store and as illustrated in
As similarly described above, the returned CNAME can also include request routing information that is different from or in addition to the information provided in the URL/CNAME of the current DNS query. For example, if the CNAME selection is based on a service level plan selected by the content provider 104, a specific identifier associated with the selected service level plan can be included in the “request_routing_information” portion of the specific CNAME record. In another embodiment, request routing information can be found in the identification of a network computing provider domain different from the domain found in the original URL. For example, if the CNAME is based on a service level plan, a specific service level plan domain (e.g., “networkcomputingprovider-servicelevel1.com”) could be used in the domain name portion of the specific CNAME record. Any additional request routing information can be prepended to the existing request routing information in the current URL/CNAME such that the previous request routing information would not be lost (e.g., http://serviceplan.networkcomputingprovider.com). One skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative techniques and/or combination of techniques may be used to include the additional request routing information in the CNAME record that is selected by the application broker 111.
With reference now to
With reference now to
In the present illustrative embodiment, one skilled in the relevant art will also appreciate that actions/steps outlined for routine 500 may be implemented by one or many computing devices/components that are associated with the application broker 111. Accordingly, routine 500 has been logically associated as being performed by the application broker 111.
At block 502, one of the DNS nameserver components of the application broker 111 receives a DNS query corresponding to a resource identifier (the “receiving DNS nameserver). As previously discussed, the resource identifier can be a URL that has been embedded in content requested by the client computing device 102 and previously provided by the content provider 104. Alternatively, the resource identifier can also correspond to a CNAME provided by a content provider DNS nameserver in response to a DNS query previously received from the client computing device 102. In either case, the resource identifier includes application information associated with the requested resource. In other embodiments, the resource identifier may also include additional information which can be used by the receiving DNS nameserver in processing the DNS query as further described below.
At decision block 504, a test is conducted to determine whether the current receiving DNS nameserver is authoritative to resolve the DNS query. In one illustrative embodiment, the receiving DNS nameserver can determine whether it is authoritative to resolve the DNS query if there are no CNAME records corresponding to the received resource identifier. For example, the receiving DNS nameserver may maintain one or more CNAMEs that define various application alternatives for request routing processing. In this embodiment, the receiving DNS nameserver utilizes the application information obtained in block 702 to select the appropriate CNAME. As similarly set forth above, in other embodiments, in addition to the application information, the receiving DNS nameserver can utilize additional information or request routing information also provided in the resource identifier to select the appropriate CNAME. Alternatively, the receiving DNS nameserver may select a CNAME by obtaining further application information or additional information based on the resource identifier, but not included in the resource identifier. Accordingly, as previously discussed, the selection of the appropriate CNAME will depend at least in part on the application information processed by the application broker 111, whether obtained directly and/or indirectly from the resource identifier associated with the DNS query. Alternative or additional methodologies may also be practiced to determine whether the DNS nameserver is authoritative.
At decision block 504, if the current receiving DNS nameserver is authoritative (including a determination that the same DNS nameserver will be authoritative for subsequent DNS queries), the current receiving DNS nameserver resolves the DNS query by returning the IP address of an instance of a NCC at block 506. Alternatively, as described above, the IP address can correspond to a hardware/software selection component (such as a load balancer) at a specific NCC POP for selecting a specific instance of a NCC. In either case, the receiving DNS nameserver selects an IP address as a function of the application information obtained directly and/or indirectly from the resource identifier associated with the DNS query. Additionally, as discussed above, the receiving DNS nameserver can identify an IP address to resolve the DNS query by also utilizing additional information or request routing information obtained from the resource identifier associated with the DNS query or otherwise obtained.
Alternatively, if at decision block 504 the receiving DNS nameserver component is not authoritative, at block 508, the DNS nameserver component selects and transmits an alternative resource identifier. As described above, the DNS nameserver component can utilize a data store to identify an appropriate CNAME as a function of the current DNS query, including at least in part the application information in the DNS portion of the URL or CNAME. Additionally, the DNS nameserver component can also implement additional logical processing to select from a set of potential CNAMES. At block 510, different DNS nameserver components of a network computing provider 107 receive a DNS query corresponding to the CNAME. The routine 500 then returns to decision block 504 and continues to repeat as appropriate.
Accordingly, in the routine 500, the receiving DNS nameserver selects either an IP address of a NCC or a CNAME, at least in part, as a function of application information provided in a DNS portion of the resource identifier associated with the DNS query. As an example, the application information in the DNS portion of the resource identifier can specify information associated with the file type of the requested resource, an application type, or specific instance of an application for processing the requested resource. As further set forth above, a number of other factors may additionally be taken into consideration for selecting the appropriate NCC or CNAME for further servicing the resource request.
While illustrative embodiments have been disclosed and discussed, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that additional or alternative embodiments may be implemented within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Additionally, although many embodiments have been indicated as illustrative, one skilled in the relevant art will appreciate that the illustrative embodiments do not need to be combined or implemented together. As such, some illustrative embodiments do not need to be utilized or implemented in accordance with scope of variations to the present disclosure.
Conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments or that one or more embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
Any process descriptions, elements, or blocks in the flow diagrams described herein and/or depicted in the attached FIGURES should be understood as potentially representing modules, segments, or portions of code which include one or more executable instructions for implementing specific logical functions or steps in the process. Alternate implementations are included within the scope of the embodiments described herein in which elements or functions may be deleted, executed out of order from that shown or discussed, including substantially concurrently or in reverse order, depending on the functionality involved, as would be understood by those skilled in the art. It will further be appreciated that the data and/or components described above may be stored on a computer-readable medium and loaded into memory of the computing device using a drive mechanism associated with a computer readable storing the computer executable components such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or network interface further, the component and/or data can be included in a single device or distributed in any manner. Accordingly, general purpose computing devices may be configured to implement the processes, algorithms and methodology of the present disclosure with the processing and/or execution of the various data and/or components described above.
It should be emphasized that many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments, the elements of which are to be understood as being among other acceptable examples. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/412,431, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,521,851, entitled “DNS QUERY PROCESSING USING RESOURCE IDENTIFIERS SPECIFYING AN APPLICATION BROKER” and filed on Mar. 27, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5063500 | Shorter | Nov 1991 | A |
5341477 | Pitkin et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5459837 | Caccavale | Oct 1995 | A |
5611049 | Pitts | Mar 1997 | A |
5649185 | Antognini et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5664106 | Caccavale | Sep 1997 | A |
5701467 | Freeston | Dec 1997 | A |
5764910 | Shachar | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5819033 | Caccavale | Oct 1998 | A |
5852717 | Bhide et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5892914 | Pitts | Apr 1999 | A |
5893116 | Simmonds et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895462 | Toki | Apr 1999 | A |
5905248 | Russell et al. | May 1999 | A |
5933811 | Angles et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937427 | Shinagawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5974454 | Apfel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991306 | Burns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016512 | Huitema | Jan 2000 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6038601 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6052718 | Gifford | Apr 2000 | A |
6078960 | Ballard | Jun 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092100 | Berstis et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098096 | Tsirigotis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108703 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128279 | O'Neil et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151631 | Ansell et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157942 | Chu et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167438 | Yates et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167446 | Lister et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173322 | Hu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182111 | Inohara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182125 | Borella et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185598 | Farber et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205475 | Pitts | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6223288 | Angles et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243761 | Mogul et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6275496 | Burns et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286043 | Cuomo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6286084 | Wexler et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304913 | Rune | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324580 | Jindal et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330602 | Law et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338082 | Schneider | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345308 | Abe | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351743 | DeArdo et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351775 | Yu | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366952 | Pitts | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6374290 | Scharber et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377257 | Borrel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386043 | Millins | May 2002 | B1 |
6405252 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408360 | Chamberlain et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411967 | Van Renesse | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415280 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430607 | Kavner | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438592 | Killian | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442165 | Sitaraman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452925 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457047 | Chandra et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459909 | Bilcliff et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473804 | Kaiser et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484143 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6484161 | Chipalkatti et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493765 | Cunningham et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505241 | Pitts | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6523036 | Hickman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529910 | Fleskes | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529953 | Van Renesse | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553413 | Leighton et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553419 | Ram | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560610 | Eatherton et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6611873 | Kanehara | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6622168 | Datta | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6633324 | Stephens, Jr. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6643357 | Lumsden | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6643707 | Booth | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654807 | Farber et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658462 | Dutta | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665706 | Kenner et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678717 | Schneider | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678791 | Jacobs et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681282 | Golden et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694358 | Swildens et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697805 | Choquier et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6698013 | Bertero et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6724770 | Van Renesse | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732237 | Jacobs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754699 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6754706 | Swildens et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769031 | Bero | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782398 | Bahl | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785704 | McCanne | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795434 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6799214 | Li | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804706 | Pitts | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810291 | Card et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810411 | Coughlin et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6829654 | Jungck | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6862607 | Vermeulen | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868439 | Basu et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874017 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6917951 | Orbits et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928467 | Peng et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6928485 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6941562 | Gao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6963850 | Bezos et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978418 | Bain et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981017 | Kasriel et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6985945 | Farhat et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6986018 | O'Rourke et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990526 | Zhu | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996616 | Leighton et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003555 | Jungck | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7006099 | Gut et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7007089 | Freedman | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009943 | O'Neil | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010578 | Lewin et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7010598 | Sitaraman et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7023465 | Stephens, Jr. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7024466 | Outten et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031445 | Lumsden | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7032010 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7058633 | Gnagy et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058706 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7058953 | Willard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065496 | Subbloie et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065587 | Huitema et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072982 | Teodosiu et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7076633 | Tormasov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7082476 | Cohen et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085825 | Pishevar et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7086061 | Joshi et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7092505 | Allison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092997 | Kasriel et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096193 | Beaudoin et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096266 | Lewin et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7099936 | Chase et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103645 | Leighton et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107273 | Ohata et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114160 | Suryanarayana et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117262 | Bai et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7120871 | Harrington | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7120874 | Shah et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133905 | Dilley et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7136922 | Sundaram et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139808 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7139821 | Shah et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143169 | Champagne et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7143170 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7146560 | Dang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7149809 | Barde et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7152118 | Anderson, IV et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162539 | Garcie-Luna-Aceves | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174382 | Ramanathan et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185063 | Kasriel et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7185084 | Sirivara et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7188214 | Kasriel et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194522 | Swildens et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7194552 | Schneider | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200667 | Teodosiu et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7216170 | Danker et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7225254 | Swildens et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7228350 | Hong et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7228359 | Monteiro | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233978 | Overton et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240100 | Wein et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249196 | Peiffer et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7251675 | Kamakura et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7254626 | Kommula et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7254636 | O'Toole, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7257581 | Steele et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7260598 | Liskov et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7260639 | Afergan et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269657 | Alexander et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7269784 | Kasriel et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7274658 | Bornstein et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284056 | Ramig | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289519 | Liskov | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7293093 | Leighton | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7308499 | Chavez | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7310686 | Uysal | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316648 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7318074 | Iyengar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7321918 | Burd et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337968 | Wilz, Sr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7339937 | Mitra et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7340505 | Lisiecki et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343399 | Hayball et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363291 | Page | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363626 | Koutharapu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370089 | Boyd et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373416 | Kagan et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7376736 | Sundaram et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7380078 | Ikegaya et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7392236 | Rusch et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398301 | Hennessey et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406512 | Swildens et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7406522 | Riddle | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7430610 | Pace et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7441045 | Skene et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441261 | Slater et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454500 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7461170 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7464142 | Flurry et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7478148 | Neerdaels | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492720 | Pruthi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496651 | Joshi | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7499998 | Toebes et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7502836 | Menditto et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7505464 | Okmianski et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506034 | Coates et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519720 | Fishman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519726 | Palliyil et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523181 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7543024 | Holstege | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7548947 | Kasriel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552235 | Chase et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7555542 | Ayers et al. | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7561571 | Lovett et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7565407 | Hayball | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568032 | Feng et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7573916 | Bechtolsheim et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7574499 | Swildens et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7581009 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7581224 | Romero | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7594189 | Walker et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596619 | Leighton et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7617222 | Coulthard et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623460 | Miyazaki | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624169 | Lisiecki et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7631101 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640296 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650376 | Blumenau | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653700 | Bahl et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7653725 | Yahiro et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657613 | Hanson et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7657622 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7661027 | Langen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664831 | Cartmell et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664879 | Chan et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7676570 | Levy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7680897 | Carter et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7684394 | Cutbill et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7685251 | Houlihan et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7685270 | Vermeulen et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7693813 | Cao et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7693959 | Leighton et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7698418 | Shimada et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7702724 | Brydon et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7706740 | Collins et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707071 | Rigole | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707173 | Nanavati et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707314 | McCarthy et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711647 | Gunaseelan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7711788 | Lev Ran et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716367 | Leighton et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7725602 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730187 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7739400 | Lindbo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747720 | Toebes et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748005 | Romero et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7752301 | Maiocco et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7756032 | Feick et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756913 | Day | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7756965 | Joshi | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7757202 | Dahlsted et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761572 | Auerbach | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7765304 | Davis et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7769823 | Jenny et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7773596 | Marques | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7774342 | Virdy | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7787380 | Aggarwal et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7792989 | Toebes et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7805516 | Kettler et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809597 | Das et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7813308 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7814229 | Cabrera et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7818454 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7827256 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836177 | Kasriel et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853719 | Cao et al. | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865594 | Baumback et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7865953 | Hsieh et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7873065 | Mukerji et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7890612 | Todd et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899899 | Joshi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7904875 | Hegyi | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7912921 | O'Rourke et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925782 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930393 | Baumback et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7930402 | Swildens et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930427 | Josefsberg et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7933988 | Nasuto et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937456 | McGrath | May 2011 | B2 |
7937477 | Day et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7945693 | Farber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949779 | Farber et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7958222 | Pruitt et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7958258 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7961736 | Ayyagari | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962597 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966404 | Hedin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970816 | Chess et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7970940 | van de Ven et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7996404 | Hedin et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979509 | Malmskog et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7991910 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996533 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7996535 | Auerbach | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000724 | Rayburn et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8001187 | Stochosky | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010707 | Elzur et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8019869 | Kriegsman | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8024441 | Kommula et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8028090 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8041773 | Abu-Ghazaleh et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041809 | Sundaram et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041818 | Gupta et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8042054 | White et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051166 | Baumback et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8065275 | Eriksen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069231 | Schran et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073940 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8082348 | Averbuj et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8108623 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117306 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8122098 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8122124 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8132242 | Wu | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8135820 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8156199 | Hoche-Mong et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8156243 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8175863 | Ostermeyer et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8190682 | Paterson-Jones et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8195837 | McCarthy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8224971 | Miller et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8224986 | Liskov et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8224994 | Schneider | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8234403 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8239530 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250135 | Driesen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250211 | Swildens et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8250219 | Raciborski et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8266288 | Banerjee et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8266327 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8271471 | Kamvar et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8280998 | Joshi | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281035 | Farber et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286176 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8291046 | Farber et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291117 | Eggleston et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8296393 | Alexander et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8296429 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8301645 | Crook | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8321568 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331370 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8380831 | Barber | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8402137 | Sivasuramanian et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8433749 | Wee et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8447876 | Verma et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452745 | Ramakrishna | May 2013 | B2 |
8452874 | MacCarthaigh et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8468222 | Sakata et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8468245 | Farber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8473613 | Farber et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478903 | Farber et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504721 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8510428 | Joshi | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8510807 | Elazary et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521851 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521880 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8521908 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526405 | Curtis et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8527639 | Liskov et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8527658 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8577992 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572208 | Farber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572210 | Farber et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8589996 | Ma et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606996 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612565 | Schneider | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615549 | Knowles et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8626950 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8635340 | Schneider | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8639817 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8645539 | McCarthy et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8676918 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8683023 | Brandwine et al. | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8688837 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8712950 | Smith et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8683076 | Farber et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732309 | Richardson et al. | May 2014 | B1 |
8745177 | Kazerani et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756322 | Lynch | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8756325 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8756341 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8762526 | Baumback et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8782236 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8782279 | Eggleston et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8819283 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8902897 | Hamilton et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8904009 | Marshall et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8914514 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8924528 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8930513 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8930544 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8938526 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8966318 | Shah | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8971328 | Judge et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9003035 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9003040 | MacCarthaigh et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9009286 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9009334 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
9021127 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021128 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9021129 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9026616 | Sivasubramanian et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9037975 | Taylor et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9071502 | Baumback et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9075893 | Jenkins | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9083675 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9083743 | Patel et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9106701 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9130756 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9137302 | Makhijani et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9154551 | Watson | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9160703 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9172674 | Patel et al. | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9176894 | Marshall et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9185012 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191338 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9191458 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9195996 | Walsh et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9208097 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9210099 | Baumback et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9210235 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237087 | Risbood et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9237114 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9240954 | Ellsworth et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9246776 | Ellsworth et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9251112 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253065 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9282032 | Judge et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9294391 | Mostert | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9323577 | Marr et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9332078 | Sivasubramanian et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9391949 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9407681 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9407699 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9444759 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9479476 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9495338 | Hollis et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9497259 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9515949 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9525659 | Sonkin et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9544394 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
20010000811 | May et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010025305 | Yoshiasa et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010032133 | Moran | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034704 | Farhat et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010049741 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010052016 | Skene et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056416 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056500 | Farber et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002613 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004846 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007413 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010783 | Primak et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010798 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020035624 | Jun-hyeong | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048269 | Hong et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049608 | Hartsell et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049857 | Farber et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052942 | Swildens et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020062372 | Hong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068554 | Dusse | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020069420 | Russell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078233 | Biliris et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082858 | Heddaya et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083118 | Sim | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083148 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083178 | Brothers | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087374 | Boubez et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091786 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091801 | Lewin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092026 | Janniello et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099616 | Sweldens | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099850 | Farber et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101836 | Dorenbosch | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103820 | Cartmell et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103972 | Satran et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107944 | Bai et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112049 | Elnozahy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116481 | Lee | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116491 | Boyd et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116582 | Copeland et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120782 | Dillon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124047 | Gartner et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124098 | Shaw | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129123 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020131428 | Pecus et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135611 | Deosaran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138286 | Engstrom | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138437 | Lewin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138443 | Schran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143675 | Orshan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143989 | Huitema et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020145993 | Chowdhury et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147770 | Tang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147774 | Lisiecki et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150094 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150276 | Chang | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152326 | Orshan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154157 | Sherr et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156911 | Croman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161745 | Call | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161767 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161911 | Pinckney, III et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163882 | Bornstein et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020165912 | Wenocur et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169890 | Beaumont et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184368 | Wang | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187935 | Redmond et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188722 | Banerjee et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194324 | Guha | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194382 | Kausik et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198953 | O'Rourke et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002484 | Freedman | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005111 | Allan | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007482 | Khello et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009591 | Hayball et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026410 | Lumsden | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030028642 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033283 | Evans et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037139 | Shteyn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041094 | Lara et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065739 | Shnier | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074401 | Connell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074471 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074472 | Lucco et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079027 | Slocombe et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093523 | Cranor et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099202 | Lear et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099237 | Mitra et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101278 | Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112792 | Cranor | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120741 | Wu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030133554 | Nykanen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135467 | Okamoto | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135509 | Davis et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140087 | Lincoln et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145038 | Tariq et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145066 | Okada et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149581 | Chaudhri et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154239 | Davis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154284 | Bernardin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163722 | Anderson, IV | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172145 | Nguyen | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172183 | Anderson, IV et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172291 | Judge et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174648 | Wang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182305 | Balva et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182413 | Allen et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182447 | Schilling | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187935 | Agarwalla et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030187970 | Chase et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191822 | Leighton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200394 | Ashmore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204602 | Hudson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221000 | Cherkasova et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229682 | Day | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233423 | Dilley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233445 | Levy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233455 | Leber et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236700 | Arning et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236779 | Choi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003032 | Ma et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010563 | Forte et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010588 | Slater et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010621 | Afergan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015584 | Cartmell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019518 | Abraham et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024841 | Becker et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030620 | Benjamin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034744 | Karlsson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039798 | Hotz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044731 | Chen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040044791 | Pouzzner | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049579 | Ims et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059805 | Dinker et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064293 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064335 | Yang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064501 | Jan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040064558 | Miyake | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068542 | Lalonde et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073596 | Kloninger et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073707 | Dillon | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073867 | Kausik et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078468 | Hedin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078487 | Cernohous et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083283 | Sundaram et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083307 | Uysal | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040117455 | Kaminksy et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128344 | Trossen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128346 | Melamed et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167981 | Douglas et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167982 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172466 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194085 | Beaubien et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194102 | Neerdaels | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040203630 | Wang | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205149 | Dillon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040205162 | Parikh | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215823 | Kleinfelter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221019 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221034 | Kausik et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246948 | Lee et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249939 | Amini et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249971 | Klinker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249975 | Tuck et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250119 | Shelest et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254921 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267906 | Truty | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267907 | Gustafsson | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010653 | McCanne | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021706 | Maggi et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021862 | Schroeder et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027882 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038967 | Umbehocker et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050044270 | Grove et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050086645 | Diao et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102683 | Branson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108169 | Balasubramanian et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108262 | Fawcett | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108529 | Juneau | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114296 | Farber et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117717 | Lumsden | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132083 | Raciborski et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147088 | Bao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050157712 | Rangarajan et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160133 | Greenlee et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163168 | Sheth et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050168782 | Kobashi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171959 | Deforche et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182826 | Knittel et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188073 | Nakamichi et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050192008 | Desai et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198334 | Farber et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198571 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216483 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216569 | Coppola et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216674 | Robbin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223095 | Volz et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228856 | Swildens et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050229119 | Torvinen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050232165 | Brawn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234864 | Shapiro | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256880 | Nam Koong et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259645 | Chen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259672 | Eduri | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262248 | Jennings, III et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266835 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267991 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267992 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267993 | Huitema et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273507 | Yan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278259 | Gunaseelan et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283759 | Peteanu et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283784 | Suzuki | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013158 | Ahuja et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020596 | Liu et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020684 | Mukherjee et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020714 | Girouard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020715 | Jungck | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026067 | Nicholas et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060026154 | Altinel et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031239 | Koenig | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031319 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036720 | Faulk, Jr. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036966 | Yevdayev | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060037037 | Miranz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039352 | Karstens | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041614 | Oe | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047787 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060047813 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059246 | Grove | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063534 | Kokkonen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064476 | Decasper et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064500 | Roth et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069808 | Mitchell et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060070060 | Tantawi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074750 | Clark et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075084 | Lyon | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060075139 | Jungck | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060083165 | McLane et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085536 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088026 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060112066 | Hamzy | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112176 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060120385 | Atchison et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060129665 | Toebes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136453 | Kwan | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143293 | Freedman | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146820 | Friedman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149529 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155823 | Tran et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155862 | Kathi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161541 | Cencini | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165051 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168088 | Leighton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173957 | Robinson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060179080 | Meek et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184936 | Abels et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190605 | Franz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193247 | Naseh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195866 | Thukral | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206568 | Verma et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206586 | Ling et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209701 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218256 | Farber et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218304 | Mukherjee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224752 | Parekh et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227740 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060227758 | Rana et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230137 | Gare et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060233155 | Srivastava | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251339 | Gokturk et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253546 | Chang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253609 | Andreev et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259581 | Piersol | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259690 | Vittal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259984 | Juneau | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265497 | Ohata et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265508 | Angel et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265516 | Schilling | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265720 | Cai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271641 | Stavrakos et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282522 | Lewin et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282758 | Simons et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060288119 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005689 | Leighton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005801 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005892 | Mullender et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011267 | Overton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070014241 | Banerjee et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016736 | Takeda et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021998 | Laithwaite et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028001 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038729 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038994 | Davis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041393 | Westhead et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043859 | Ruul | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050522 | Grove et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050703 | Lebel | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055764 | Dilley et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061440 | Sundaram et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076872 | Juneau | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086429 | Lawrence et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094361 | Hoynowski et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101061 | Baskaran et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070101377 | Six et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118667 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118668 | McCarthy et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070134641 | Lieu | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136469 | Nusbickel | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156919 | Potti et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162331 | Sullivan | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168517 | Weller | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174426 | Swildens et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174442 | Sherman et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174490 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183342 | Wong et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198982 | Bolan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070204107 | Greenfield et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208737 | Li et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219795 | Park et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220010 | Ertugrul | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233705 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233706 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233846 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233884 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243860 | Aiello et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244964 | Challenger et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245010 | Arn et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250467 | Mesnik et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250560 | Wein et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250601 | Amlekar et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250611 | Bhogal et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253377 | Janneteau et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255843 | Zubev | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070263604 | Tal | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266113 | Koopmans et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266311 | Westphal | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266333 | Cossey et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270165 | Poosala | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271375 | Hwang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271385 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271560 | Wahlert et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280229 | Kenney | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288588 | Wein et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291739 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080005057 | Ozzie et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008089 | Bornstein et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080016233 | Schneider | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025304 | Venkataswami et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037536 | Padmanabhan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046550 | Mazur et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046596 | Afergan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056207 | Eriksson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065724 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065745 | Leighton et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071859 | Seed et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071987 | Karn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080072264 | Crayford | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082551 | Farber et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080082662 | Dandliker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086559 | Davis et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080086574 | Raciborski et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092242 | Rowley | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080103805 | Shear et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080104268 | Farber et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080109679 | Wright et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114829 | Button et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125077 | Velazquez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126706 | Newport et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134043 | Georgis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140800 | Farber et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147866 | Stolorz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147873 | Matsumoto | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155059 | Hardin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155061 | Afergan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155613 | Benya et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155614 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162667 | Verma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162821 | Duran et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162843 | Davis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080172488 | Jawahar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183721 | Bhogal et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189437 | Halley | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080201332 | Souders et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215718 | Stolorz et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215730 | Sundaram et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215735 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215747 | Menon et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215750 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215755 | Farber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222281 | Dilley et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222291 | Weller et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222295 | Robinson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228574 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228920 | Souders et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235400 | Slocombe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080256175 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263135 | Olliphant | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275772 | Suryanarayana et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281946 | Swildens et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281950 | Wald et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288722 | Lecoq et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301670 | Gouge et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312766 | Couckuyt | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319862 | Golan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320123 | Houlihan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320269 | Houlihan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090013063 | Soman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016236 | Alcala et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029644 | Sue et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031367 | Sue | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031368 | Ling | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031376 | Riley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090049098 | Pickelsimer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090063038 | Shrivathsan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063704 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090070533 | Elazary et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083228 | Shatz et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090083279 | Hasek | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086728 | Gulati et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090086741 | Zhang | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089869 | Varghese | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103707 | McGary et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106381 | Kasriel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112703 | Brown | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122714 | Kato | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125393 | Hwang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125934 | Jones et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132368 | Cotter et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090132648 | Swildens et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090144411 | Winkler et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090144412 | Ferguson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150926 | Schlack | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157850 | Gagliardi et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090158163 | Stephens et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164331 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164614 | Christian et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090177667 | Ramos et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182815 | Czechowski et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182837 | Rogers | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090182945 | Aviles et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187575 | DaCosta | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090198817 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204682 | Jeyaseelan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210549 | Hudson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090233623 | Johnson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090241167 | Moore | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248697 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248786 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248787 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248852 | Fuhrmann et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248858 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248893 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249222 | Schmidt et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253435 | Olofsson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254661 | Fullagar et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259588 | Lindsay | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259971 | Rankine et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271498 | Cable | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271577 | Campana et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090271730 | Rose et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276771 | Nickolov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090279444 | Ravindran et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090282038 | Subotin et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287750 | Banavar et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090307307 | Igarashi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327460 | Yoo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327489 | Swildens et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327517 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327914 | Adar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005175 | Swildens et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011061 | Hudson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100011126 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100023601 | Lewin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100030662 | Klein | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100030914 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100034470 | Valencia-Campo et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100036944 | Douglis et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042725 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070603 | Moss et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082320 | Wood et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100082787 | Kommula et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088367 | Brown et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088405 | Huang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095008 | Joshi | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100629 | Raciborski et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100057894 | Glasser | May 2010 | A1 |
20100111059 | Bappu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115133 | Joshi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100115342 | Shigeta et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121953 | Friedman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100121981 | Drako | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122069 | Gonion | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125626 | Lucas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125673 | Richardson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100125675 | Richardson et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100128638 | Navas et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131646 | Drako | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138559 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100150155 | Napierala | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161799 | Maloo | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169392 | Lev Ran et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100169452 | Atluri et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174811 | Musiri et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192225 | Ma et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217801 | Leighton et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217856 | Falkena | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223364 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100226372 | Watanabe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100228819 | Wei | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100257024 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257266 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100257566 | Matila | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268789 | Yoo et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268814 | Cross et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274765 | Murphy et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281482 | Pike et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293296 | Hsu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100293479 | Rousso et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299427 | Joshi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299438 | Zimmerman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299439 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312861 | Kolhi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318508 | Brawer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322255 | Hao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100332595 | Fullagar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110010244 | Hatridge | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110029598 | Arnold et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040893 | Karaoguz et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110055714 | Vemulapalli et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110055921 | Narayanaswamy et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110058675 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072138 | Canturk et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072366 | Spencer | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078000 | Ma et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110078230 | Sepulveda | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110085654 | Jana et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110087769 | Holmes et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110096987 | Morales et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110113467 | Agarwal et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110153938 | Verzunov et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153941 | Spatscheck et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154318 | Oshins et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161461 | Niven-Jenkins | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166935 | Armentrout et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110182290 | Perkins | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110191445 | Dazzi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191449 | Swildens et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110191459 | Joshi | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110196892 | Xia | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208876 | Richardson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110208958 | Stuedi et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110209064 | Jorgensen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110219120 | Farber et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219372 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238501 | Almeida | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110238793 | Bedare et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239215 | Sugai | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110252142 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252143 | Baumback et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258049 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110258614 | Tamm | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270964 | Huang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276623 | Girbal | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110296053 | Medved et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110302304 | Baumback et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320522 | Endres et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320559 | Foti | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120011190 | Driesen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120066360 | Ghosh | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120072600 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120079115 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089972 | Scheidel et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120096065 | Suit et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120110515 | Abramoff et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120124184 | Sakata et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131177 | Brandt et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136697 | Peles et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143688 | Alexander | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159476 | Ramteke et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166516 | Simmons et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120169646 | Berkes et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173677 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120173760 | Jog et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179817 | Bade et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179839 | Raciborski et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120036238 | Sundaram et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120198043 | Hesketh et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224516 | Stojanovski et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233522 | Barton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120233668 | Leafe et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120254961 | Kim et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120257628 | Bu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120303785 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303804 | Sundaram et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311648 | Swildens et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324089 | Joshi | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003735 | Chao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007100 | Trahan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007101 | Trahan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007102 | Trahan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007241 | Trahan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130007273 | Baumback et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019311 | Swildens et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130034099 | Hikichi et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041872 | Aizman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046869 | Jenkins et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130067530 | Spektor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080420 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080421 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080576 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130080577 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086001 | Bhogal et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117849 | Golshan et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130221 | Kortemeyer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130133057 | Yoon et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130151646 | Chidambaram et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198341 | Kim | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212300 | Eggleston et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130227165 | Liu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130246567 | Green et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130268616 | Sakata et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130305046 | Mankovski et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311605 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318153 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130339429 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346567 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006577 | Joe et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140007239 | Sharpe et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019605 | Boberg | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140036675 | Wang et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140040478 | Hsu et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140053022 | Forgette et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059120 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059198 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140059379 | Ren et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140075109 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140089917 | Attalla et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140108672 | Ou et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129707 | Baumback et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137111 | Dees et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143320 | Sivasubramanian et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140164817 | Bartholomy et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165061 | Greene et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140257891 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140297870 | Eggleston et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310402 | Giaretta et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140310811 | Hentunen | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140325155 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140331328 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140337472 | Newton et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140365666 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150067171 | Yum | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150081842 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150172178 | Judge et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172379 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172407 | MacCarthaigh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172414 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150172415 | Richardson et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180988 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150188994 | Marshall et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150195244 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150207733 | Richardson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215270 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150229710 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150249579 | Ellsworth et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256647 | Richardson et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150263927 | Baumback et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150319194 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150319260 | Watson | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150334082 | Richardson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160021197 | Pogrebinsky et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160026568 | Marshall et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160028644 | Richardson et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160041910 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057072 | Baumback et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160065665 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160072720 | Richardson et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160134492 | Ellsworth et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160142367 | Richardson et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160205062 | Mosert | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160241637 | Marr et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241639 | Brookins et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160241651 | Sivasubramanian et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160254985 | Judge et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160308959 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2741 895 | May 2010 | CA |
1422468 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1511399 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1605182 | Apr 2005 | CN |
101189598 | May 2008 | CN |
101460907 | Jun 2009 | CN |
101473598 | Jul 2009 | CN |
103731481 | Apr 2014 | CN |
1603307 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1351141 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2008167 | Dec 2008 | EP |
07-141305 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2001-0506093 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-249907 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-024192 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-044137 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-323986 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2003-167810 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-167813 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-522358 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003188901 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004-070935 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2004-532471 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2004-533738 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-537687 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2007-133896 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-207225 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-515106 | May 2008 | JP |
2009-071538 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2012-509623 | Apr 2012 | JP |
2012-209623 | Oct 2012 | JP |
WO 2002069608 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO 2005071560 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2007007960 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007126837 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2009124006 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010002603 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO 2012044587 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012044587 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2012065641 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gunther et al, “Measuring Round Trip Times to determine the Distance between WLAN Nodes”,May 2005, In Proc. of Networking 2005, all pages. |
Kalafut et al., Understanding Implications of DNS Zone Provisioning., Proceeding IMC '08 Proceedings of the 8th AMC SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement., pp. 211-216., ACM New York, NY, USA., 2008. |
Kato, Yoshinobu , Server load balancer—Difference in distribution technique and supported protocol—Focus on function to meet the needs, Nikkei Communications, Japan, Nikkei Business Publications, Inc., Mar. 20, 2000, vol. 314, pp. 114 to 123 (No Eng Trans). |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09729072.0 2266064 dated Dec. 10, 2014. |
Fourth Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 dated Jan. 15, 2015. |
Decision of Refusal in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 dated Jan. 16, 2015. |
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 dated Dec. 22, 2014. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 dated Mar. 9, 2015 (Eng Translation Not Yet Received). |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 dated Dec. 2, 2014 in 2 pages. |
Bennami, M., et al., Resource Allocation for Autonomic Data Centers Using Analytic Performance Models, 2005, IEEE, 12 pages. |
Kounev, S., et al., Autonomic QoS-Aware Resource Management in Grid Computing Using Online Performance Models, 2007, ICST, Valuetools, 2007, 10 pages. |
Armour et al.: “A Heuristic Algorithm and Simulation Approach to Relative Location of Facilities”; Management Science, vol. 9, No. 2 (Jan. 1963); pp. 294-309. |
Meng et al., “Improving the Scalability of Data Center Networks with Traffic-Aware Virtual Machine Placement”; Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Information Communications, INFOCOM'10, pp. 1154-1162. Piscataway, NJ. IEEE Press, 2010. |
Search Report for European Application No. 09839809.2 dated May 11, 2015. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080057225.0 dated May 14, 2015. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080057155.9 dated May 21, 2015. |
“Global Server Load Balancing with Serverlron,” Foundry Networks, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.foundrynet.com/pdf/an-global-server-load-bal.pdf, 7 pages. |
“Grid Computing Solutions,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/grid, 3 pages. |
“Grid Offerings,” Java.net, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://wiki.java.net/bin/view/Sungrid/OtherGridOfferings, 8 pages. |
“Recent Advances Boost System Virtualization,” eWeek.com, retrieved from May 3, 2006, http://www.eWeek.com/article2/0,1895,1772626,00.asp, 5 pages. |
“Scaleable Trust of Next Generation Management (STRONGMAN),” retrieved May 17, 2006, from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dsl/STRONGMAN/, 4 pages. |
“Sun EDA Compute Ranch,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://sun.com/processors/ranch/brochure.pdf, 2 pages. |
“Sun Microsystems Accelerates UltraSP ARC Processor Design Program With New Burlington, Mass. Compute Ranch,” Nov. 6, 2002, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2002-11/sunflash.20021106.3 .xml, 2 pages. |
“Sun N1 Grid Engine 6,” Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/software/gridware/index.xml, 3 pages. |
“Sun Opens New Processor Design Compute Ranch,” Nov. 30, 2001, Sun Microsystems, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.sun.com/smi/Press/sunflash/2001-11/sunflash.20011130.1.xml, 3 pages. |
“The Softricity Desktop,” Softricity, Inc., retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.softricity.com/products/, 3 pages. |
“Xen—The Xen virtual Machine Monitor,” University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/, 2 pages. |
“XenFaq,” retrieved Nov. 8, 2005, from http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenFaq?action=print, 9 pages. |
Abi, Issam, et al., “A Business Driven Management Framework for Utility Computing Environments,” Oct. 12, 2004, HP Laboratories Bristol, HPL-2004-171, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-171.pdf, 14 pages. |
Al-Fares, M. et al., A Scalable, Commodity Data Center Network Architecture, SIGCOMM '08 Proceedings, Aug. 17, 2008, pp. 63-74, 66-68, 70-71, Seattle, WA. |
American Bar Association; Digital Signature Guidelines Tutorial [online]; Feb. 10, 2002 [retrived on Mar. 2, 2010]; American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Information Security Committee; Retrieved from the internet: (URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20020210124615/www.abanet.org/scitech/ec/isc/dsg-tutorial.html; pp. 1-8. |
Baglioni et al., “Preprocessing and Mining Web Log Data for Web Personalization”, LNAI 2829, 2003, pp. 237-249. |
Barbir, A., et al., “Known Content Network (CN) Request-Routing Mechanisms”, Request for Comments 3568, [online], IETF, Jul. 2003, [retrieved on Feb. 26, 2013], Retrieved from the Internet: (URL: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3568.txt). |
Bellovin, S., “Distributed Firewalls,”;login;:37-39, Nov. 1999, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/-smb/papers/distfw. html, 10 pages, retrieved Nov. 11, 2005. |
Blaze, M., “Using the KeyNote Trust Management System,” Mar. 1, 2001, from http://www.crypto.com/trustmgt/kn.html, 4 pages, retrieved May 17, 2006. |
Brenton, C., “What is Egress Filtering and How Can I Implement It?—Egress Filtering v 0.2,” Feb. 29, 2000, SANS Institute, http://www.sans.org/infosecFAQ/firewall/egress.htm, 6 pages. |
Byun et al., “A Dynamic Grid Services Deployment Mechanism for On-Demand Resource Provisioning”, IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid:863-870, 2005. |
Chipara et al, “Realtime Power-Aware Routing in Sensor Network”, IEEE, 2006, 10 pages. |
Clark, C., “Live Migration of Virtual Machines,” May 2005, NSDI '05: 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, MA, May 2-4, 2005, retrieved from http://www.usenix.org/events/nsdi05/tech/full_papers/clark/clark.pdf, 14 pages. |
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Apr. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 2, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/lxf/38/iptables.pdf, 4 pages. |
Coulson, D., “Network Security Iptables,” Mar. 2003, Linuxpro, Part 1, retrieved from http://davidcoulson.net/writing/lxf/39/iptables.pdf, 4 pages. |
Deleuze, C., et al., A DNS Based Mapping Peering System for Peering CDNs, draft-deleuze-cdnp-dnsmap-peer-00.txt, Nov. 20, 2000, 20 pages. |
Demers, A., “Epidemic Algorithms for Replicated Database Maintenance,” 1987, Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Aug. 10-12, 1987, 12 pages. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 dated Feb. 16, 2013. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Jul. 4, 2012. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Jul. 6, 2012. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980145872.4 dated Nov. 29, 2012. |
Greenberg, A. et al., Networking the Cloud, 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2009), Jun. 22, 2009-Jun. 26, 2009 [online] retrieved from the Internet on Mar. 10, 2011: http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/icdcs2009/Keynote_files/greenberg-keynote.pdf, pp. 1-45. |
Greenberg, A. et al., Towards a Next Generation Data Center Architecture: Scalability and Commoditization, SIGCOMM '08: Proceedings of the 2008 SIGCOMM Conference and Co-Located Workshops NSDR '08, WOSN '08, MOBIARCH '08, NETECON '08, & Presto '08, Seattle, WA, Aug. 17-28, 2008, ACM, Aug. 17, 2008, pp. 57-62, New York, NY. |
Greenberg, A. et al., VL2: A scalable and flexible data center network, SIGCOMM '09, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 Conference on Data Communication, Aug. 17, 2009, vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 51-62. |
Gruener, J., “A Vision of Togetherness,” May 24, 2004, NetworkWorld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from, http://www.networkworld.com/supp/2004/ndc3/0524virt.html, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/060567 dated Jun. 19, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/060569 dated Jun. 19, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/060573 dated Jun. 19, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2007/007601 dated Sep. 30, 2008 in 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/053302 dated Apr. 2, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in PCT/US2011/061486 dated May 22, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US07/07601 dated Jul. 18, 2008 in 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2010/060567 dated Mar. 28, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/053302 dated Nov. 28, 2011 in 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/US2011/061486 dated Mar. 30, 2012 in 11 pages. |
Ioannidis, S., et al., “Implementing a Distributed Firewall,” Nov. 2000, (ACM) Proceedings of the ACM Computer and Communications Security (CCS) 2000, Athens, Greece, pp. 190-199, retrieved from http://www.cis.upenn.edu/˜dls/STRONGMAN/Papers/df.pdf, 10 pages. |
Joseph, Joshy, et al., “Introduction to Grid Computing,” Apr. 16,2004, retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.informit.com/articles/printerfriendly.aspx?p=169508, 19 pages. |
Kenshi, P., “Help File Library: Iptables Basics,” Justlinux, retrieved Dec. 1, 2005, from http://www.justlinux.com/nhf/Security/Iptables _ Basics.html, 4 pages. |
Liu et al., “Combined mining of Web server logs and web contents for classifying user navigation patterns and predicting users' future requests,” Data & Knowledge Engineering 61 (2007) pp. 304-330. |
Maesono, et al., “A Local Scheduling Method considering Data Transfer in Data Grid,” Technical Report of IEICE, vol. 104, No. 692, pp. 435-440, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Japan, Feb. 2005. |
Mysore, R.N. et al., Portland: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric, SIGCOMM '09, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 Conference on Data Communication, Aug. 17, 2009, pp. 39-50. |
Nilsson et al., IP-Address Lookup Using LC-Tries, IEEE Journalk on Selected Areas of Communication, Jun. 1999, vol. 17, Issue 6, pp. 1083-1092. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2726915 dated May 13, 2013. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Feb. 25, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200780020255.2 dated Mar. 4, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119995.0 dated Apr. 15, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502138 dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502140 dated Dec. 7, 2012. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 dated Mar. 6, 2013. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2012-052264 dated Dec. 11, 2012 in 26 pages. |
Office Action in Korean Application No. 10-2011-7002461 dated May 29, 2013. |
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 28, 2013. English Translation Not Yet Received. |
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 dated Nov. 19, 2012. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
Shankland, S., “Sun to buy start-up to bolster N1 ,” Jul. 30, 2003, CNet News.com, retrieved May 3, 2006, http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5057752.html, 8 pages. |
Singapore Examination Report in Application No. 201006837-7 dated May 16, 2012. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Apr. 30, 2012 in 10 pages. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006836-9, dated Oct. 12, 2011 in 12 pages. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006837-7, dated Oct. 12, 2011 in 11 pages. |
Singapore Written Opinion in Application No. 201006874-0, dated Oct. 12, 2011 in 10 pages. |
Strand, L., “Adaptive distributed firewall using intrusion detection,” Nov. 1, 2004, University of Oslo Department of Informatics, retrieved Mar. 8, 2006, from http://gnist.org/˜lars/studies/master/StrandLars-master.pdf, 158 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 07754164.7 dated Dec. 20, 2010 in 7 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09727694.3 dated Jan. 30, 2012 in 6 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report in Application No. 09728756.9 dated Jan. 8, 2013. |
Takizawa, et al., “Scalable MultiReplication Framework on the Grid,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2004, No. 81, pp. 247-252, Japan, Aug. 1, 2004. |
Tan et al., “Classification: Basic Concepts, Decision Tree, and Model Evaluation”, Introduction in Data Mining; http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/˜kumar/dmbook/ch4.pdf, 2005, pp. 245-205. |
Van Renesse, R., “Astrolabe: A Robust and Scalable Technology for Distributed System Monitoring, Management, and Data Mining,” May 2003, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 21(2): 164-206, 43 pages. |
Vijayan, J., “Terraspring Gives Sun's N1 a Boost,” Nov. 25, 2002, Computerworld, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2002/0,4814, 76159,00.html, 3 pages. |
Virtual Iron Software Home, Virtual Iron, retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.virtualiron.com/, 1 page. |
Waldspurger, CA., “Spawn: A Distributed Computational Economy,” Feb. 1992, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(2): 103-117, I5 pages. |
Watanabe, et al., “Remote Program Shipping System for GridRPC Systems,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2003, No. 102, pp. 73-78, Japan, Oct. 16, 2003. |
Xu et al., “Decision tree regression for soft classification of remote sensing data”, Remote Sensing of Environment 97 (2005) pp. 322-336. |
Yamagata, et al., “A virtual-machine based fast deployment tool for Grid execution environment,” Report of Study of Information Processing Society of Japan, Information Processing Society, vol. 2006, No. 20, pp. 127-132, Japan, Feb. 28, 2006. |
Zhu, Xiaoyun, et al., “Utility-Driven Workload Management Using Nested Control Design,” Mar. 29, 2006, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, HPL-2005-193(R.1), retrieved Aug. 30, 2007, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2005/HPL-2005-193R1.pdf, 9 pages. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111422.3 dated Apr. 13, 2012. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 dated Dec. 25, 2013. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502139 dated Nov. 5, 2013. |
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Oct. 21, 2013. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2741895 dated Oct. 21, 2013. |
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201103333-9 dated Aug. 13, 2013. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-529454 dated Feb. 3, 2014 in 6 pages. |
First Office Action issued in Australian Application No. 2011307319 dated Mar. 6, 2014 in 5 pages. |
Office Action in Indian Application No. 3742/KOLNP/2008 dated Nov. 22, 2013. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980119993.1 dated Oct. 21, 2013. |
Chang, F., et al., Automatic Configuration and Run-time Adaptation of Distributed Applications, 2000, IEEE, 10 pages. |
Examination Report in Singapore Application No. 201006874-0 dated May 16, 2012. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2784699 dated Apr. 28, 2014. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2784706 dated May 22, 2014. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-123086 dated Apr. 15, 2014 in 3 pages. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2013-540982 dated Jun. 2, 2014 English Translation Not Yet Received. |
Preliminary Examination in Chinese Application No. 201310717573.1 dated Feb. 25, 2014. English Translation Not Yet Received. |
Second Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 dated Mar. 17, 2014. |
Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201303521-7 dated May 20, 2014. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2012,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541, filed Jan. 3, 2012; 35 pages. |
“Final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2012,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541, filed Sep. 5, 2012; 40 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 4, 2013,” U.S. Appl. No. 12/652,541, filed Jan. 4, 2013; 11 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970; 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970; 13 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 5, 2014,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/842,970; 6 pages. |
Hartung et al.; Digital rights management and watermarking of multimedia content for m-commerce applications; Published in: Communications Magazine, IEEE (vol. 38, Issue: 11 ); Date of Publication: Nov. 2000; pp. 78-84; IEEE Xplore. |
Mulligan et al.; How DRM-based content delivery systems disrupt expectations of “personal use”; Published in: Proceeding DRM '03 Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Digital rights management; 2003; pp. 77-89; ACM Digital Library. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated May 3, 2015. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080057229.9 dated May 14, 2014. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080057229.9 dated Mar. 18, 2015. |
Horvath et al., “Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Multi-tier Web Server Clusters via Prioritization,” in Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2007. IPDPS 2007. IEEE International , vol., No., pp. 1-6, Mar. 26-30, 2007. |
Fifth Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 dated Aug. 14, 2015. |
Canonical Name (CNAME) DNS Records, domainavenue.com, Feb. 1, 2001, XP055153783, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.domainavenue.com/cname.htm [retrieved on Nov. 18, 2014]. |
“Content delivery network”, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Contentdelivery network&oldid=601009970, XP055153445, Mar. 24, 2008. |
First Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 dated Nov. 3, 2014. |
Gunther et al, “Measuring Round Trip Times to determine the Distance between WLAN Nodes”, Dec. 18, 2004, Technical University Berlin, all pages. |
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 200980111426.1 dated Jul. 7, 2014. |
Decision of Rejection in Application No. 2011-502139 dated Jun. 30, 2014. |
First Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-503091 dated Nov. 18, 2013. |
Search Report and Written Opinion issued in Singapore Application No. 201006873-2 dated Oct. 12, 2011. |
Search Report and Written Opinion in Singapore Application No. 201301573-0 dated Jul. 1, 2014. |
First Office Action is Chinese Application No. 200980125551.8 dated Jul. 4, 2012. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080057225.0 dated Jul. 2, 2014. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201080057155.9 dated Jul. 24, 2014. |
Sharif et al, “Secure In-VM Monitoring Using Hardware Virtualization”, Microsoft, Oct. 2009 http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/153179/sim-ccs09.pdf; 11 pages. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-225580 dated Oct. 26, 2015. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2816612 dated Nov. 3, 2015. |
Second Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180053405.6 dated Dec. 4, 2015. |
Office Action in European Application No. 07754164.7 dated Dec. 14, 2015. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-502139 dated Aug. 17, 2015. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2011-516466 dated May 30, 2016. |
Third Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 dated Apr. 14, 2016. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-533132 dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2884796 dated Apr. 28, 2016. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2015114568 dated May 16, 2016. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2015-075644 dated Apr. 5, 2016. |
Office Action in European Application No. 09839809.2 dated Dec. 8, 2016. |
Office Action in Japanese Application No. 2014-225580 dated Oct. 3, 2016. |
Partial Supplementary Search Report in European Application No. 09826977.2 dated Oct. 4, 2016. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201310717573.1 dated Jul. 29, 2016. |
Decision of Rejection in Chinese Application No. 201180046104.0 dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2816612 dated Oct. 7, 2016. |
Office Action in Chinese Application No. 201310537815.9 dated Jul. 5, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130339429 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12412431 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 13973883 | US |