Patent Grant
8625875
The field of the invention relates generally to document processing systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to systems for the imaging and handling of financial documents along with systems for processing information extracted from financial documents.
In the financial banking industry, and in general, it is important that counterfeit or forged financial documents (for example, currency bills or checks) be discovered quickly and accurately. There is a need for improved financial document processing systems and, in particular, for improved currency processing systems including currency processing systems that can image currency bills, retain electronic records containing the image of processed currency bills or portions thereof, and data associated with those images and/or processed bills. There is also a need for financial document processing systems with improved systems for processing data associated with financial documents.
According to some embodiments, a document processing system comprises one or more currency scanning devices configured to rapidly process a stack of currency bills, obtain images of the processed bills, and extract information from the images of the processed bills that uniquely identify a bill. The system further comprises a processor connected to the one or more scanning devices. The processor is configured to receive the images and/or the extracted information from the scanning devices and is further configured to employ a correction routine configured to adjust errors in the extracted information from the document image.
According to some embodiments, a document processing device comprises an input receptacle configured to receive a plurality of documents and an image scanner configured to obtain a document image of at least a portion of one side of each of the plurality of documents. The scanner is further configured to extract information from the document image. The device further comprises a transport mechanism configured to transport each of the plurality of documents one at a time from the input receptacle passed the image scanner and to an output receptacle. A controller is coupled to the transport mechanism and to the image scanner. The controller is configured to at least partially control the transport mechanism and the image scanner. A memory is coupled to at least one of the controller and the image scanner. The memory being configured to store at least one of information extracted from the document image and information identifying at least one of counterfeit and forged documents. The device further comprises a processor that is coupled to the memory. The processor is configured to compare the information extracted from the document image with information stored in the memory for identifying at least one of counterfeit and forged documents. The processor further being configured to identify at least one of a suspected counterfeit and forged document based on the comparison operation. The document processing device continuously transports documents during the comparison and identification operation. Moreover, the information extracted from the document image at least partially contains character information obtained from a predetermined field of the document image. The processor may also contain a search routine configured to search the character information.
According to some embodiments, a document processing system comprises a plurality of document scanning devices that extract information from document images. The document system further comprises a central processor remotely connected to the document scanning devices. The central processor is configured to receive the document images and the extracted information from the document scanning devices. The central processor is further configured to employ a correction routine configured to adjust an error in the extracted information from the document image.
According to some embodiments, a currency note processing device comprises at least one input receptacle configured to receive a plurality of currency notes and an image scanner configured to obtain at least a partial image of at least one side of each of the plurality of currency notes. The currency note processing device further comprises a transport mechanism configured to transport each of the plurality of currency notes one at a time from the input receptacle to the image scanner and from the image scanner to an output receptacle. A controller is coupled to the transport mechanism and to the image scanner. The controller is configured to at least partially control the transport mechanism and the image scanner. A memory, configured to store the at least partial image, is coupled to the image scanner. The currency note processing device further comprises a processor coupled to the memory. The processor is configured to denominate the plurality of currency notes by applying a denominating algorithm to the stored at least partial image.
According to certain embodiments, a document processing device comprises an input receptacle configured to receive a plurality of documents and an image scanner configured to obtain a document image of at least a portion of at least one side of each of the plurality of documents. The scanner is further configured to extract information from the document image. The document processing device further comprises a transport mechanism configured to transport each of the plurality of documents one at a time from the input receptacle to the image scanner and from the image scanner to an output receptacle. A controller is coupled to the transport mechanism and to the image scanner. The controller is configured to at least partially control the transport mechanism and the image scanner. A memory, coupled to at least one of the controller and the image scanner, is configured to store the information from the document image. The document processing device further comprises a processor coupled to the memory. The processor is configured to execute a correction routine that applies a first algorithm for automatically adjusting errors identified in the extracted information.
Additional aspects and other advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings.
In the following, certain embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings, wherein:
a is a perspective view of a compact document scanning device according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a side cross-sectional view of the device shown in
a is a perspective view of a compact document scanning device having multiple pockets according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a side cross-sectional view of the device shown in
a is a perspective view of a document scanning device according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a top partial view of the device shown in
c is a side, partial sectional view of the device shown in
d is an enlarged partial, sectional view of area 4d from
e is a functional block diagram of an image scanner configuration according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
f is a functional block diagram of a document scanning device according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
a is a top view of a document being transported past an image scanner in a wide-edge leading manner according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a top view of a document being transported past an image scanner in a narrow-edge leading manner according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
a is a representation of an image file of a currency bill according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a representation of an image file of a check according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
a is a block diagram of a document processing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a block diagram of a document processing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
c is a block diagram of a document processing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
a is a flowchart describing the operation of a document processing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a flowchart describing the operation of a document processing system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
a is a top view of an input receptacle according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
b is a top view of the input receptacle of
a is a top view of an image of a currency bill having an image portion.
b is a top view of the image portion of
c is a top view of one of the sample areas of
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
When describing various embodiments, the term “currency bills” refers to official currency bills including both U.S. currency bills, such as a $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50, or $100 note, and foreign currency bills.
Foreign currency bills are bank notes issued by a non-U.S. governmental agency as legal tender, such as a Euro, Japanese Yen, or British Pound note.
“Substitute currency notes” are sheet-like documents similar to currency bills but are issued by non-governmental agencies such as casinos and amusement parks and include, for example, casino script and Disney Dollars. Substitute currency notes each have a denomination and an issuing entity associated therewith such as a $5 Disney Dollar, a $10 Disney Dollar, a $20 ABC Casino note and a $100 ABC Casino note.
“Currency notes” consist of currency bills and substitute currency notes.
“Substitute currency media” are documents that represent a value by some marking or characteristic such as a bar code, color, size, graphic, or text. Examples of “substitute currency media” include without limitation: casino cashout tickets (also variously called cashout vouchers or coupons) such as “EZ Pay” tickets issued by International Gaming Technology or “Quicket” tickets issued by Casino Data Systems; casino script; promotional media such as Disney Dollars or Toys 'R Us “Geoffrey Dollars”; or retailer coupons, gift certificates, gift cards, or food stamps. Accordingly, substitute currency media includes, but is not limited to, substitute currency notes. Substitute currency media may or may not be issued by a governmental body.
The term “currency documents” includes both currency bills and “substitute currency media.”
The term “non-currency documents” includes any type of document, except currency documents.
Although many embodiments refer to the “denomination” of currency bills as a criterion used in judging the currency bills, other predetermined criteria can be used to judge the currency bills or documents, such as, for example, color, size, orientation, series, fitness, condition, etc.
Various embodiments described herein can be used to judge non-currency documents and/or currency documents according to one or more predetermined criteria, such as color, size, shape, orientation, series, fitness, condition, etc.
Everyday, businesses and people unknowingly accept counterfeit currency documents as genuine. A counterfeit currency document is a currency document which is not issued by an authorized maker. For example, in the case of U.S. currency bills, a counterfeit currency bill would be a document printed to look like a genuine U.S. bill but not printed by the U.S. Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving and Printing. In terms of casino script, a counterfeit currency document would be a script that is not issued by the casino or one that has been tampered with or altered.
The term “businesses” refers to any business or entity accepting money from another entity or person. Throughout most of this description, the term “bank” will be used for ease of description. It should be understood, however, that this disclosure also applies to people, companies, corporations, other financial institutions such as savings and loans, and any other entity that receives currency bills or currency documents. To reduce the costs associated with receiving counterfeit currency documents and to prevent the receiving entity, such as a bank, from having to assume all of the risks and costs from accepting counterfeit currency documents, a document processing system according to the present disclosure may be used.
Turning now to
An operator inserts a currency document 135 into the input receptacle 110. In this application, the term “operator” refers to someone operating scanning device under normal operating conditions such as a bank employee or customer. The document scanning device 100 may be used in a variety of situations. For example, the document scanning device 100 may be used as an unattended device, like an Automated Teller Machine (ATM) or other interfaced device, in which the operator is a customer who uses the device to deposit currency documents and/or checks into a bank account. In another embodiment, the document scanning device 100 may be a non-interfaced, stand-alone device. In another embodiment, the document scanning device 100 may be a semi-attended device where both a customer and an employee are at the device. In another alternative embodiment, the document scanning device 100 may be used only by employees of the bank or other entity using it.
According to some embodiments, the document scanning device 100 may be adapted to receive only one currency document at a time. According to other embodiments, the document scanning device may be adapted to receive a stack of currency documents in the input receptacle 110. The transport mechanism 120 is coupled to the input receptacle 110 and is adapted to transport currency bills or documents along a transport path through the document scanning device 100, past an image scanner 140 and to one or more output receptacles 130. According to some embodiments, a controller or processor 150 is linked to the image scanner 140, the transport mechanism 120, a memory 160, and an operator interface or control panel 170. The controller is adapted to control the operation of the transport mechanism 120 and the image scanner 140, communicate information to and from the memory 160, and to communicate information to and from the operator control panel 170. For example, the controller 150 may send display information to and receive operator input from the operator control panel 170.
Once the image scanner 140 receives an instruction from the controller 150, the image scanner 140 scans a currency document 135, and obtains an image of the currency document. The image may be an image of substantially the entire currency document 135 (a “full image”) or of selected portions of the currency document 135. The image scanner 140 or controller 150 may contain data extraction software such as optical character recognition (OCR) software for identifying the characters contained in one or more fields of the image of a currency document. For example, the OCR software may implement a search of the full image of a currency bill for a serial number field, extract the serial number once the field is located, and transfer the determined serial number data to the memory 160 through the controller 150 for storage. In an alternative embodiment, the image scanner 140 is directly linked to the memory 160 for the transfer and storage of the images and/or extracted data.
The memory 160 may be adapted to store the images of the currency documents 135 or other documents scanned by the image scanner 140. According to some embodiments, the memory 160 is adapted to store the full image of processed currency documents 135 or other processed documents (that is, data associated with a picture of the entire document 135). According to some embodiments, the memory 160 may be adapted to only store an image of a portion of currency documents 135. For example, it may be that the memory 160 only needs to store an image of half of the currency document 135 and still have the fields needed for a particular application. According to some embodiments, the memory 160 is also adapted to store extracted information, such as information which may be used to uniquely identify bills, track documents, and/or assist in detecting counterfeit currency documents. For example, it is known that people who create counterfeit U.S. currency bills often reuse the same serial number on the counterfeit currency bills. Therefore, according to some embodiments, the memory 160 is adapted to store serial numbers associated with known counterfeit bills and/or the serial numbers extracted from bills otherwise determined to be suspected counterfeit bills by the scanning device 100.
According to some embodiments, when a currency bill is scanned, the controller 150 or an alternate computing device 180 compares the serial number of the scanned currency bill against any serial numbers stored in the memory 160. If a match is found, the controller 150 may send a signal to the operator control panel 170 to indicate that a suspected counterfeit bill has been found. In some embodiments, the bill suspected to be counterfeit may be flagged. In some embodiments, a number of data can be used to assess whether a bill is a suspect bill, including serial number, denomination, series, issuing bank, image quality, infrared characteristics, ultraviolet characteristics, color shifting ink, watermarks, metallic threads, holograms, etc., or some combination thereof.
In other types of currency documents, another predetermined or encoded field may be used to check for authenticity. For example, in bar coded tickets or currency documents using bar codes, certain bar codes may be known to be counterfeit. Alternatively, other security features, such as certain arrangements only going with certain denominations, may be utilized to determine the authenticity of the currency bill. For example, a hologram may only be used with high denomination currency bills, so a lower denomination bill that has a hologram would be recognized as being counterfeit. Other encoded fields may also be utilized in a similar fashion. In some embodiments, the fields utilized may be overt security codes, such as a series number, or they may be covert security codes that are not made public by the government to provide greater security, such as magnetic coated threads or radio frequency identification (RFID) tags.
In some embodiments, the controller 150 may cause the operation of the document scanning device 100 to halt once a counterfeit currency document is flagged or detected so that the suspect document may be examined. According to some embodiments, such as devices having more than one output receptacle, suspected counterfeit bills may be off-sorted to another output receptacle, while the document scanning device 100 continues to run. Once this occurs, the operator may be notified of the serial number of the counterfeit bill via the operator control panel 170. The operator control panel 170 may be, for example, a display screen that is capable of depicting images or it may only be an LED light that illuminates or blinks to warn of a counterfeit currency document.
According to some embodiments, the document scanning device 100 is communicatively coupled to a separate computing device or processor 180 such as a personal computer (PC). In some embodiments, the scanning device 100 is adapted to obtain images of processed currency documents or checks and to send those images to a PC 180 or other remote device able to process the images. According to some embodiments, the data extraction from the obtained images, such as by OCR software and/or additional image processing, is performed on a computing device 180 that is separate from document scanning device 100 as opposed to within the scanning device 100 itself. In other embodiments, data extraction such as via OCR is performed within the document scanning device 100, such as on a processor that is part of image scanner 140 or controller 150.
According to some embodiments, the extracted data such as OCRed characters retrieved from a scanned image of a currency bill are then sent to an external computing device 180 for further processing or storage. In an exemplary embodiment, a document scanning device is self-contained to perform the computing operations needed to perform one or more of the following tasks: obtain a full image of a currency bill, capture the currency bill serial number, recognize the currency bill denomination, identify the currency bill series, perform an OCR algorithm to extract character information from the currency bill, enhance an image such as by deskewing, correct errors to the OCR character information extracted from a currency bill, and/or transferring extracted data to a database. In other embodiments, image and extracted character data may be sent to an external device such as a printer, computer, and/or external storage device. Image and extracted character data can be used to update customer account information, identify counterfeit documents, and/or provide an archive record for retrieval at a later date.
Additional information regarding scanning devices, systems, and method associated with the present disclosure may be found in:
a and 2b depict a compact document scanning device 200 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The compact document scanning device 200 illustrated in
The compact document scanning device 200 in
According to some embodiments, a pair of driven stacking wheels 212, 213 are located in the output receptacle 217 and come into contact with the documents as the documents are transported into the output receptacle 217. The stacking wheels 212, 213 are supported for rotational movement about respective shafts 215 journalled on a rigid frame and driven by a motor (not shown). Flexible blades of the driven stacking wheels 212, 213 deliver the documents onto a forward end of a stacker plate 214. While stacking wheels with flexible blades are shown, for example in
According to some embodiments, the document scanning device 200 is compact, having a height (H2) of about 9 to 12½ inches, a width (W2) of about 11 to 15 inches, and a depth (D2) of about 12 to 16 inches. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 200 has a footprint of less than 2 square feet. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 200 has a footprint of less than 1½ square feet. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 200 has a footprint of less than 1 square feet.
a and 3b depict an exterior perspective view and a side cross-sectional view of a multi-pocket compact document scanning device 300 containing one or more image scanners, as described in the present disclosure. According to some embodiments, the process for carrying documents through the system is the same as discussed above, except that the processing system has two output receptacles 317a, 317b. In the illustrated embodiment, a diverter 360 directs the documents to either the first or second output receptacle 317a, 317b. When the diverter 360 is in a lower position, documents are directed to the first output receptacle 317a. When the diverter 360 is in an upper position, documents proceed in the direction of the second output receptacle 317b. Details of multiple output receptacles and devices are described in International Publication No. WO 97/45810, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. According to some two pocket embodiments, counterfeit documents may be off-sorted without having to stop the device. Also, such embodiments may be used in sorting between different types of documents, denominations, or series.
According to some embodiments, the document scanning device 300 is compact, having a height (H3) of about 17½ inches, a width (W3) of about 13½ inches, and a depth (D3) of about 15 inches. According to some embodiments, the document scanning device has dimensions of a height (H3) of about 20 inches, a width (W3) of about 15 inches, and a depth (D3) of about 18 inches. The document scanning device 300 may be rested on a tabletop. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 300 has a footprint of less than 2 square feet. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 300 has a footprint of less than 1½ square feet. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 300 has a footprint of less than 210 in2.
According to some embodiments of compact document scanning devices 100, 200, 300, documents are transported, imaged, scanned, and identified at a rate of between about 300 to about 400 documents per minute. According to some embodiments of compact document scanning devices 100, 200, 300, documents are transported, imaged, scanned, and identified at a rate in excess of 600 documents per minute. In other embodiments, documents such as checks or currency bills are transported, imaged, scanned, and identified at a rate in excess of 800 bills or documents per minute by the scanning devices 100, 200, 300. In yet other embodiments, documents such as checks or currency bills are transported, imaged, scanned, and identified at a rate in excess of 1000 bills or documents per minute by the scanning devices 100, 200, 300. In some embodiments, documents are transported, imaged, scanned, and identified at a rate in excess of 1200 bills per minute by the scanning devices 100, 200, 300. According to some embodiments, the scanning devices 100, 200, 300 transport documents at a rate in excess of 1500 bills per minute.
a-4d depict a document scanning device 400 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.
Documents are fed by the transport mechanism, one at a time or serially past denominating sensor 455 and then past image scanners 460a, 460b, which are adapted to retrieve a full or partial image of each passing document. In some exemplary embodiments, image scanner 460 is an the AMI Semiconductor Model PI228 image sensor or other similar models such as image sensors having different light sources or combinations thereof, including, but not limited to white, red, green, blue, infra-red and/or ultraviolet light image sensors. According to some embodiments, the image obtained using the image scanner may be compressed, for example into a .jpg or .tif format, in order to minimize the transmission bandwidth between the various components of a document scanning system. Image compression is useful for several reasons including the minimization of data transmission between document processing system components.
According to some embodiments, the two-pocket document scanning device 400 is compact, having a height (H4) of or less than about 15 inches, a width (W4) of or less than about 10½ inches, and a depth (D4) of or less than about 17 inches. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 400 has a footprint of less than about 2 square feet. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 400 has a footprint of less than about 1½ square feet. According to some embodiments, the high-speed scanning device 300 has a footprint of less than about 1¼ square feet. According to some embodiments, the scanning device 400 weighs less than about 35 lbs. According to some embodiments, the document scanning device 400 is compact and adapted to be rested on a tabletop or countertop. According to some embodiments, the document scanning device can be a part of a larger document processing device such as, for example, larger systems used for currency or other types of document sorting.
d illustrates an enlarged area 4d from
According to some embodiments, device 400 is a high-speed U.S. currency imaging device having an input receptacle adapted to receive U.S. currency in a wide-edge leading manner, that is, U.S. currency is positioned within the input receptacle and transported through the scanning device 400 such that the wide or long edge of the currency is generally perpendicular to the transport direction (see
According to some embodiments, a U.S. currency imaging device 400 has a transport path width, TW4, of approximately 7.5 inches. In certain embodiments, imaging device 400 has a transport width of approximately 9 to 10 inches.
According to some embodiments, device 400 is a high-speed U.S. currency and check imaging device having an input receptacle adapted to receive both U.S. currency and standard check in a wide-edge leading manner, that is, documents are positioned within the input receptacle and transported through the scanning device 400 such that the wide or long edge of the document is generally perpendicular to the transport direction (see, for example,
Commercial checks are longer than standard checks. Some commercial checks have a length of up to approximately 9 or 10 inches and a width of approximately 3.5 inches. According to some embodiments, the scanning device 400 is adapted to receive, image, and otherwise process U.S. currency bills and standard checks in a wide-edge leading manner (see
Some embodiments of device 400 are adapted to receive, image, and process stacks of intermingled currency bills and checks. Alternatively, some embodiments of device 400, are adapted to receive, image, and process stacks of only one type of document at a time. For example, the device 400 may be adapted to first process and image currency bills and then, after the stack of currency bills has been processed, to process separately a stack of checks.
f is a schematic representation of document imaging device 400 communicatively coupled to an external processor 480 such as a PC. According to some embodiments, the external processor or PC 480 is communicatively coupled to a monitor or display 482.
According to some embodiments, the output receptacles 430a, 430b of the device 400 are adapted to receive, documents separated as authenticated and non-authenticated (for example, counterfeit or forged) or separated by document types, such as currency bills and checks.
According to some embodiments, an image scanning device, such as described in
With the capability of extracting character information from currency bills at an approximately 100 DPI scanning resolution, memory and processing demands can be reduced when using the previously described OCR algorithm. Furthermore, according to some embodiments, lower resolution scanning enables the image scanner to image a currency bill quicker than imaging at 200 DPI. In certain embodiments, such as described in connection with
According to some embodiments, an image scanner such as image scanning device 400 is adapted to obtain a full image of the front and back of a U.S. currency bill, denominate the bill, extract the bill's serial number, and, if necessary, stop the transport, in less than approximately 80 milliseconds. In some such embodiments, AMI Semiconductor Model PI 228 image sensors are employed. According to some embodiments, an image scanner such as image scanning device 400 is adapted to feed and process U.S. currency bills in a wide-edge leading manner at a rate of about 1000 bills per minute, while obtaining a full image of the front and back of each U.S. currency bill, denominate the bill, extracting the serial number of the bill, and, if necessary, stop the transport in less than approximately 80 milliseconds. According to some embodiments, an image scanner such as image scanning device 400 is adapted to feed and process U.S. currency bills in a wide-edge leading manner at or in excess of about 1000 bills per minute and obtain a full image of the front and back of each U.S. currency bill and to extract the serial numbers of the bills in less than approximately 50 milliseconds after the images of the front and back of a U.S. currency bill has been obtained.
According to some embodiments, an image scanner, such as, image scanning device 400, is adapted to feed and process U.S. currency bills in a wide-edge leading manner at or in excess of about 1000 bills per minute while obtaining a full image of the front and back of each U.S. currency bill and extracting the serial numbers of the bills before the bills have been transported approximately 5 to 6 inches past the last image scanner (for example, image sensor 460a). According to some such embodiments, a multi-output receptacle imaging device 400 is provided wherein a first document diverter is positioned at or less than 5 to 6 inches downstream of the last image scanner and wherein the device is adapted to sort documents based on the scanned imaged and/or extracted data, such as, extracted bill serial numbers, using the diverter.
According to some embodiments, an image scanner, such as, image scanning device 400, is adapted to feed and process U.S. currency bills in a wide-edge leading manner at or in excess of about 1000 bills per minute while obtaining a full image of the front and back of each U.S. currency bill using image sensors positioned opposite each other along a transport path and extracting the serial numbers of the bills before the bills have been transported approximately 5 to 6 inches past the image scanners. According to some such embodiments, a multi-output receptacle imaging device 400 is provided wherein the device is adapted to sort documents based on the scanned images and/or data extracted from images obtained using the image sensors such as extracted bill serial numbers using a diverter positioned at or less than 5 to 6 inches downstream of the image sensors.
According to some embodiments, an image scanner, such as, image scanning device 400, is adapted to feed and process currency documents, such as, U.S. currency bills, at or in excess of about 1000 bills per minute while obtaining a full image of the front and back of each U.S. currency bill and extracting data such as the serial numbers of bills before the documents have traveled approximately 5 to 6 inches past the last image scanner (for example, image sensor 460a). According to some such embodiments, a multi-output receptacle imaging device 400 is provided wherein a document diverter is positioned at or less than 5 to 6 inches downstream of an image scanner and wherein the device is adapted to sort documents based on the scanned imaged obtained from the image scanner and/or data extracted from the obtained image such as extracted bill serial numbers using the diverter.
In certain embodiments, such as described above, the image scanners described for the document scanning devices of the present disclosure have a depth of field of approximately 0.06 inches, which is approximately double the typical depth of field for a financial document scanning device. The use of an increased depth of field allows for improved operation of the transport mechanism by minimizing the need for hold down rollers near the imaging scanner, thereby reducing the number of moving parts in the transport mechanism. Increasing the depth of field for the image scanner to approximately 0.06 inches also provides improved focus for check or currency document imaging particularly for a document that experiences flutter while advancing through the transport mechanism. In certain embodiments, a hold down roller approximately 6 inches long, or approximately as long at the image scanner, is positioned directly opposite an image sensor with the gap between the image sensor and hold down roller sufficient to minimize flutter as a document passes the image scanner. In certain exemplary embodiments, a gap between the hold down roller and the image scanner of 0.003 to 0.006 inches may be used for the scanning of currency documents. In other embodiments, gaps less than and greater than this range may be used.
In certain embodiments, a drive roller (for example, drive roller 465 in
In certain embodiments, the imaging scanner is capable of capturing an image when the speed of the transport mechanism is allowed to vary. In some embodiments, a belt in the transport mechanism can operate at a velocity ranging from approximately 0 to 100 inches per second or faster. In certain embodiments, a belt transport mechanism can operate at a velocity up to approximately 200 inches per second. A document scanning device with the capability to operate at varying transport mechanism speeds allows the document processing rate of the document scanning device to be decreased and for the device to be stopped and restarted, including when a document is under an image scanner, while maintaining the quality of document image capture. A contact image sensor (CIS) or charge-coupled device (CCD) can be used for imaging in a document scanning device. In one embodiment, an image scanner can read a maximum of 10,000 lines per second, which is approximately 100 μs of exposure per scan line when scanning at a 100 DPI resolution. Line sampling for an image scanner operating at a 200 DPI resolution occurs for every 0.005 inches of document movement and at a 100 DPI resolution for every 0.010 inches of document movement.
According to some embodiments, luminance control techniques are used to minimize exposure effects when the transport mechanism speed is varied. For a luminance control procedure, the brightness of the pixels in the image scanner fluctuate with the transport mechanism velocity. First, the pixels of a sensor array are calibrated to have the same value when exposed to the same calibration material. In one exemplary embodiment, a material having the same spectral properties as the calibration material can be placed over the first few pixels (e.g., approximately the first five or more pixels) of an array, which are then used as tracking pixels. The tracking pixels generally provide a constant output value based upon the calibration. A change in the value(s) of the tracking pixel(s) indicates a change in brightness. When a change in brightness is detected, the imaging device compensates for the brightness change by applying a correction factor (that is, a multiplier) to each pixel of the array including the tracking pixels. The correction factor is determined by calculating brightness drift based on the change in value of the tracking pixels. For example, if the change in brightness increased by a factor of 1.1, then every pixel in the array will be divided by 1.1. This correction method works well for minor fluctuations in luminance, such as on the order of 0.5 to 2.0. In one embodiment, when the luminance fluctuation correction factor exceeds a certain threshold value, such as, at correction factors of less than 0.5 or greater than 2.0, the brightness of the light source is either increased or decreased until the correction factor falls close to 1.0. In the case of a transport mechanism approaching or coming to a complete stop, the brightness of the light source can generally only be decreased to a certain level before the image quality is affected. To overcome this limitation, the document speed of the transport mechanism can be monitored such that when the speed approaches less than half (for example, ⅓ and ¼) of normal run speed (for example, 100 lines per minute), the brightness of the light source is adjusted to the value calculated during calibration and the line scan rate of the sensors is set to be continuous and to occur at the fastest line rate that the sensor allows (for example, 10,000 lines per second). With a constant line scan rate, the luminance of the captured image remains constant, regardless of the speed of the document along the transport mechanism. In this mode however, the process of reading line images will be out of sync with the line sampling requests and thereby out of sync with the document being imaged or scanned. Since the speed of the transport mechanism has decreased by more than a factor of two, two or more line scan reads will occur between sampling requests, such as, for example, every 0.003 inches. It is therefore necessary to combine these multiple reads into a single output that represents the line to be imaged at the point of the sample request. For example, if four line scan reads occur between sampling requests, then the image that is output will be the average of these four line reads.
In certain embodiments, the transport mechanism rate will be increased from between a rate of zero to a certain threshold rate, such as less than one half of the normal run speed. Up to this point, the brightness of the light source will be at the calibrated value and the line scan rate for the sensors will be set at the fastest line rate that the sensor allows (for example, 10,000 lines per second). With a constant line scan rate, the luminance of the captured image will remain constant, regardless of the speed of the document. In this mode however, the process of reading line images will be out of sync with the line sampling requests, and thereby, out of sync with the document, as well. Since the speed of the scanner is less than half of full speed, several line scan reads will occur between sampling requests. These multiple reads will be combined into a single output that represents the line to be imaged at the point of the sample request. For example, if four line scan reads occur between sampling requests, then the image that is output will be the average of these four line reads. When the transport mechanism rate increases to the threshold rate (for example, greater than ½ of full speed), the line scan rate will be resynchronized with the sampling rate, thereby allowing image brightness to fluctuate with the change in the transport speed, with light source brightness adjustments made and/or a correction factor applied thereafter to achieve a generally uniform image of the document being scanned.
In another embodiment, image processing techniques are used in which lines are sampled and stored to memory on a continual basis regardless of the speed of the transport mechanism. The exposure of an image and the resulting luminance, therefore, generally remains the same. Any minor variations in luminance that may occur due to drift in the light source or fluctuations in speed can be corrected using the process discussed above for the luminance control method by using correction factors and adjusting the brightness of the light source. These adjustments for drift corrections are generally minor and are preferably made in between document scans or during idle periods of document scanning so that the effect on image quality is minimized. In one embodiment, the distance a document advances along the transport mechanism during a line scan exposure cycle is measured and stored along with the corresponding line image. The distance a document moves during the exposure cycle defines the importance or weight assigned to the image retrieved from a particular line read. For example, if the document scanning device is stopped, a calculated weight for the image streaming from the image sensor is zero since there is zero document motion. In another example, if the document has moved 0.002 inches in a document scanning system where each pixel is 0.005 inches, that is 200 DPI, then the calculated weight for the image streaming from the image sensor is 40 percent. Following the collection of one or more line scans, the lines that are stored in memory can be interpolated using the weight assigned to each stored line. For example, if an imaging sample request occurs and there are three lines stored in memory, the first line with a 10 percent weight, the second line with a 30 percent weight, and the third line with a 60% weight, then the image line that is output in response to the imaging sample request is the sum of each of the three weighted lines. Thus, the weighting percentage calculated for each line defines how much an individual line scan will contribute to the overall image line that is output.
a and 6b illustrate the transporting and imaging of documents in a wide-edge leading (
In certain embodiments, the transport mechanism may be fit with a magnetic sensor being configured to identify the magnetic characters on a check or currency document fed into the document scanning device in a direction that is perpendicular to either the longer edge or the narrower edge of the document.
Referring now to
Therefore, in addition to the two image fields 710 and 720, the image file or record 700 also comprises a number of data fields such as a serial number data field 730a, a signatories data field 739a, a denomination data field, a series data field 760a, a back plate data field 770a, a front plate data field, and/or a print code data field 769a. To better understand these various data fields, reference is made to image fields 710 and 720. As can be seen in the images of a $1 bill contained in the image fields 710 and 720, the image of the $1 bill reveals that the $1 bill contains a variety of information including a variety of alphanumeric information. For example, the $1 bill shown has a serial number 730, two signatories 739 (Treasurer's signature) and 740 (signature of the Secretary of Treasury), a numeric denomination 750 in addition to one or more written denominations 750b, series information (767, 760, 765), a back plate number 770, a front plate number 768, and a print code 769. The various data fields (for example, 730a) contain data such as alphanumeric data or characters extracted from the images of the $1 bill. For example, a serial number 730 is extracted from the bill and stored in a data portion 730a of the record 700.
In addition to the image fields and extracted data fields, the image record 700 may also contain other data such as alphanumeric or biometric data associated with person or account associated with the imaged document. Additionally, the image record may contain other information concerning the document such as information obtained from sensor(s) separate from the sensor(s) used to obtain images of the document, such as, for example, data retrieved from authentication sensors. For example, the image file 700 may also include an account number field 780a that is associated with the currency bill. The account number may be added to the image file by the document scanning device 100, 200, 300, 400 or a processor or computer coupled thereto and/or coupled to a database containing records 700, such as, computing device 180 or external processor 480. According to some embodiments, the account number field 780a refers to the account into which the currency bill is/was deposited. This allows someone viewing the image file or record to know what account obtained credit for the bill. For example, if the bill was deposited and later discovered to be counterfeit, by searching the database containing image records 700, it can be determined what account received credit for the counterfeit bill. Appropriate action may then been taken such as flagging the account and/or debiting the account for the value of the counterfeit bill.
In some embodiments, it may also be desired to extract signatory information such as a Treasurer's signature 739 and a signature of the Secretary of Treasury 740. Likewise, in some embodiments, dollar amount information 750, series information 760, and Federal Reserve Bank number 765 and letter 767, and plate number 770 on the backside of a currency bill 720, may be extracted. All of these fields may be used for cross-referencing the serial number with the currency bill for purposes of determining counterfeit bills. For example, the serial number of the bill may be related to the series. If these items do not match, then the bill is a counterfeit. Also, in certain series, the Federal Reserve Bank number 765, 767 may be in different locations. In some series, the letter portion 767 is in a seal. In other series, the number portion 765 is right next to the letter portion 767, with neither being in the seal. The signatory information 739, 740, dollar amount information 750, series information 760, Federal Reserve Bank number 765, 767, front plate number 768, print order code 769, and back plate number 770 may all be extracted and inserted into the appropriate fields 739a, 740a, 750a, 760a, 765a, 767a, 768a, 769a, 770a, respectively, in the image file. According to some embodiments, the software is updateable to handle changes in any fields that change over time.
Other fields may also be included in alternative embodiments, such as, a field relating to the issuing federal reserve bank, the country of origin (if multiple country currencies are accepted), and others. It is also contemplated that foreign currency may have other useful information on the bill, such as, other security measures which it may be useful to extract from the image of the bill. One example would be the size of the currency document. In many foreign countries, the size of the currency bill varies with denomination. As a preliminary measure, the size of the currency bill may be measured to ensure that the bill is the appropriate size.
In other embodiments, the locations of certain items may be different. For example, in later U.S. currency series, the picture may be larger and/or off-center. Also, some of the extracted information may be located in a different position.
Turning now to
Areas 715c, 715d represent data fields containing, respectively, the ABA number and control information. The ABA number and control information is needed so that the image file can be transmitted among financial institutions. The ABA number is a number that corresponds to the bank that issued the check. In other words, the bank to which the image file belongs can easily be recognized by an operator or a processor or computer system associated with the scanning devices 100, 200, 300, 400 or associated with a database containing the image record 700. The data in data fields 715c, 715d may be extracted from the area 715a or from the MICR encoding on the check (such as by a device 100, 200, 300, 400 containing a magnetic MICR reader). The numbers illustrated are used as examples and are not meant to represent the exact digits or number of digits used.
Also taken from the MICR encoding line on the check is data in an account number data field 715e (for example, the ON-US field), which contains the account number for the check extracted from the image of the check. The account number allows an operator or a processor or computer system associated with the scanning devices 100, 200, 300, 400 and/or the database to determine which account to debit or which was debited for the funds.
The image record 700 may also contain an identification data field 720b containing data indicating the name and address of the owner of the account associated with the check. This information may be taken from an identification field 720a on the image of the check. Normally, this information is on the upper left side of the check and usually includes at least the name of the owner of the account, and may include address and telephone information.
On the written portion of the check, an amount of the check is indicated in an amount (or CAR or courtesy amount recognition) box 730a as well as being written out in a LAR (or legal amount recognition) field 731a. This information may be extracted from the image and inserted into an amount data field 730b. Other written information, such as a payee name 740a, may also be extracted from the full image and added into a payee data field 740b. A check number 750a may be extracted and added into a check number data field 750b. It should be recognized that the fields illustrated are not inclusive of all possible fields and types of information which can be stored in an image record 700. Indeed, other types of information can be stored as can pointers to other files having, for example, further information relating to the customer. In some cases, it may also be useful to read the memo line of the check. In addition, it is contemplated that an operator may fill in some of these fields. For example, in an embodiment of the present invention that only requires the customer to sign the document, the payee field and amount field may be added to the image before it is processed. The format of the image fields 705, 710 may be standardized for ease of processing, that is, using .tif, .bmp, .pdf, .gif, or .jpg. This allows other software to process the information in image files for use by the merchant or financial institution. As with respect to
Referring back to the embodiments described in
According to some embodiments, image data obtained from the image scanner(s) 460 can be buffered at a memory component along the communication path between the various controller(s) and/or processor(s). Buffering is useful for allowing the scanning process to continue despite possible data bottlenecks in the document scanning system.
According to some embodiments, the images are used to obtain identification characteristics for the document, such as serial number in the case of currency bills, account number or check number in the case of checks, or other encoded or encrypted identifiers. According to some embodiments, the images are also used to denominate the documents such as currency bills. According to some embodiments, bills are denominated using other techniques and/or sensors such as described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,652,802; 5,815,592; 5,992,601; and 6,256,407, each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. In the case of a device with more than one output receptacle, such as device 400, the documents can be sorted, for example, by separating out counterfeit documents, separating checks and currency bills, or separating certain denominations of currency documents. According to some embodiments, the device 400 generates a total value for the documents in the stack that were successfully denominated and/or imaged.
According to some embodiments, the device 400 creates a database of image records containing data fields comprising the extracted serial number of the bills and associated account numbers or identifiers. According to some embodiments, image records also contain one or more image fields, such as a field containing the image of the front of a bill, the image of the back of a bill, and/or snippet images of portions of a bill such as an image of the area around the serial number of a bill (for example, the snippet images 830 shown in
According to some embodiments, processing image information can occur directly on a device, such as device 400, or using a PC or other processor 480 (see
According to some embodiments, serial numbers, including alphanumeric strings, are extracted from images of currency bills, for example, using OCR techniques to identify individual alphanumeric characters. Sometimes a complete serial number cannot be extracted, for example, when a currency bill has been subjected to wear. Incomplete serial number information can be displayed, for example, on control panel 450 as shown in
According to some embodiments, the correction of unreadable serial number information, including alphanumeric strings, can be performed while the document scanning device 400 continues to process subsequent documents in a batch and/or after the device has processed all documents in a batch and the device has stopped. According to some embodiments, the device stops when an unreadable serial number is encountered and processing of subsequent documents continues after the serial number or unreadable digits of the serial number have been entered by an operator. For example, the document scanning device can stop at a document for which there was an incomplete character extraction and prompt the operator to make the correction after which document processing can continue. In other embodiments, the document scanning device continuously processes documents, meanwhile storing incomplete character extractions into a queue for later correction by an operator. In some embodiments, the document scanning device can off-sort documents with incomplete character extraction for later correction. In other embodiments, a document scanning device can ignore incomplete character extractions and store the incomplete records for subsequent searching. See, for example, the record for Bill 6 in
According to some embodiments, a document scanning device can be programmed or set where the transport mechanism stops before a particular flagged currency document or check is transported to an output receptacle, such as described in, for example, U.S. application Ser. No. 10/953,635, filed on Sep. 29, 2004 and published as U.S. Pub. No. 2005-0040225, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. For example, an operator can input a particular serial number or denomination for a currency bill and the document scanning device can be set to stop when that particular bill is encountered. In other embodiments, the particular bill can be off-sorted while the document processing continues. Such an embodiment is useful, for example, for an operator to identify documents with certain characteristic(s) that may be located within a stack of currency documents or checks.
According to some embodiments, a document scanning device processes documents continuously, including when a document requiring additional attention is encountered during the scanning process. For example, while imaging a currency bill, an algorithm (e.g., for denomination or OCR) may have difficulty determining the denomination or serial number from the image obtained for the currency bill. The controller 150, in the example of
In certain embodiments, a search algorithm is capable of allowing a customer or operator to search a list or database of serial numbers of other identifiers stored in a memory that is internal to or that is communicatively coupled to a document scanning device. A search algorithm can query one or more fields of data, such as, actual serial numbers or information associated with an actual serial number including date, customer, account number where documents were deposited, time deposit were made, document scanning device used, or any other information that might be useful for authenticating a currency bill or check. The information associated with a serial number or other identifier can be extracted and stored along with the serial number or other identifier at the time the serial number or other identifier is stored in the memory.
In certain embodiments, a search can be performed of a database of currency bill serial numbers to find, for example, counterfeit currency documents. First, an operator of a device, such as, device 400 and/or a processor 480 containing or communicatively coupled to a database containing the deposit records (such as shown in
Table 1 shows an exemplary embodiment of how a search algorithm can operate. A customer may receive information of a counterfeit currency bill having serial number 1 5 7 3 2 6 9 1 4 8. The operator can then key the ten digit serial number into a PC that has a database of serial numbers extracted from imaged currency bills using, for example, OCR methods stored in the PC's memory. The operator may, for example, specify that seven of the ten digit positions are to have a character match and a position match with the keyed-in serial number.
In the exemplary results shown in Table 1, three currency bills are identified that meet the search criteria and make them candidates for a possible serial number match. All three identified bills have limited recognition of serial number characters during the OCR extraction that followed imaging of the bills. The image for the bill in the top row was retrieved because of the eight digit match of 1 ? 7 3 2 ? 9 1 4 8 with the keyed-in ten digit serial number of 1 5 7 3 2 6 9 1 4 8. In some embodiments, the operator can view the image of the serial numbers for the corresponding retrieved field by viewing a serial number snippet or an image of an entire bill. For the top row of Table 1, review of the imaged serial number does not show a match with the keyed-in serial number. Review of the imaged serial number for the currency bill in the middle row, however, does identify a match with the keyed-in serial number. The operator is therefore able to identify a counterfeit currency bill based on partially recognized serial numbers from database records of scanned currency bills. The operator can compare the retrieved list and associated serial number images with the keyed-in counterfeit serial number to check for any matches.
For certain banking procedures in the U.S., a bank may send currency bills to the Federal Reserve. When the Federal Reserve receives the currency bills, a check can be completed for the bills to determine if there are counterfeit bills present in the transmittal. The Federal Reserve may then prepare a report that is sent to the bank identifying the denomination and the serial number of the counterfeit bill(s). A bank will not receive credit for currency bills deposited with the Federal Reserve that are determined to be counterfeit. Previously, the bank attempting to deposit the counterfeit currency bill has had to take the loss from the Federal Reserve for the value of a counterfeit currency bill since there was no way to track who deposited the counterfeit bill with the bank. With the present disclosure, a bank now has a system for databasing serial numbers for currency bill deposits and the ability to search the database to identify serial numbers of concern. If a matching serial number is found for the currency bill that was determined to be counterfeit, the corresponding account such as identified in the matching database record can be debited the denomination of the counterfeit currency bill. The present disclosure also provides a system for allowing a bank to identify counterfeit currency documents immediately rather than having to send a currency bill, for example, to the Federal Reserve, have the Federal reserve determine the bill is counterfeit, and then returning the bill to the bank for submittal to the Secret Service or directly sending the bill to the Secret Service. With the present disclosure, a bank can immediately track the account or customer that deposited a counterfeit bill and then send the counterfeit directly to the Secret Service, thus bypassing the Federal Reserve and speeding up the process of counterfeit tracking.
In the exemplary document scanning devices illustrated in the present disclosure, serial numbers and other identifying currency bill information for a particular deposit can be obtained by running a deposit through the scanning device. An image of the currency bills can be obtained and OCR can be used to extract serial numbers, including alphanumeric characters. According to some embodiments. customer identifying information will be associated with the deposit and stored in a database record along with an image of the currency bill, the serial number information, the currency bill denominations, and customer identifying information in a database. The database record can be stored internal to the document scanning device or external to the document scanning device on, for example, a PC or in a memory coupled to a computer network. The serial numbers of counterfeit bills that are later identified can then be compared with the database records for deposits made to an entity to determine which depositor may be associated with a counterfeit bill. A system can also be configured to track whether more than one counterfeit serial number has been deposited over a given period of time. In some embodiments, database records can be searched to verify if duplicate serial number records are in the database. For example, an automatic database function may be to compare all databased serial numbers to identify matching or repeating serial numbers and to flag those records for subsequent investigation. A matching serial number can include all the alphanumeric character in a serial number or can be limited to only the numeric portion of a serial number. If the matching algorithm is limited to finding numeric matches, additional operator assistance may be needed to determine whether a currency bill is a counterfeit.
a is another embodiment of the present invention, and depicts a block diagram of a document processing system 1100. The document processing system 1100 includes a document scanning device 1110, which is configured to receive currency bills. The document scanning device 1110 of
The document scanning device 1110 is connected via a communication link 1120 to a first computer 1130. The first computer 1130 can be any type of computer, such as a personal computer, a server, part of a LAN, or a mainframe. The communication link 1120 can be any link used for data, voice, or video communications that is known in the field of disclosure, such as a telephone line, Ethernet, USB 2.0, FireWire, a wireless network, or other known communication techniques between devices. The communication link 1120 may be over a private line or a public line. In some embodiments, the document scanning device 1110 may be connected to the first computer 1130 via the internet. Alternatively, the communication link 1120 may be over another form of media, such as a radio or microwave link. The first computer 1130 may be located in the same place as the document scanning device 1110 or it may be in a location remote, or separate, from the document scanning device 1110. For example, it is contemplated that the document scanning device 1110 is located at a branch of the bank, while the first computer 1130 is located at the main office or processing center of the bank. In some embodiments, the individual document scanning device 1110 may be linked to each other via the communication link 1120.
In one embodiment, currency bills or other documents are fed into the document scanning device 1110 for deposit into a customer's account. The first computer 1130 is a part of the banking system at a financial institution that holds the customer's account. The first computer 1030 is adapted to credit the customer's account for the amount of a deposit. Before crediting the account, currency bills are scanned by the document scanning device 1110. A full image or an image of a portion of one side of a deposit bill or bills may then be obtained. As discussed herein, the document scanning device 1110 may be similar to the document scanning devices 100, 200, 300, 400 in
In another embodiment, the document scanning device 1110 merely scans the currency bills and the first computer 1130 authenticates the currency documents, as described herein. The images may be transferred via the communication link 1120 to the first computer 1130, which may be located at a bank. The first computer 1130 may then use the stored images to process information (for example, credit the customer's account, update customer's account with the number of counterfeits flagged). The first computer 1130 may run the serial number of the currency bills through a database or a memory to check for counterfeit serial numbers. If a match is found, the suspect bill may be rejected and the amount of the suspect bill debited from the customer's account. Alternatively, the bank may not wish to debit the customer's account every time a counterfeit is found, instead only debiting the account for repeat offenders or for bills over a certain dollar amount. The first computer 1130 may also create a chart for law enforcement personnel of who attempted to deposit the suspect bills.
In another embodiment, the first computer 1130 may store the images of all deposited currency documents to aid in reconciling discrepancies that may arise at a later date. For example, if a deposited currency bill is later found to be counterfeit using any variety of counterfeit detectors, the bank can track that currency bill to the customer that deposited the counterfeit bill. Currently, once a bill is deposited into a financial account (or mixed with any other bills), there is no way for a bank to track the bill. If a bill is later determined to be counterfeit, the bank cannot track the bill to the customer that deposited the counterfeit bill and the bank must, therefore, bear the loss. In certain embodiments, the document images that are captured and stored in memory can be limited to, for example, higher denomination currency bills such as 20s, 50s and 100s. This embodiment can be useful where time and memory space is a concern for the document scanning system since the database of serial numbers or other pertinent document information could be significantly reduced.
According to some embodiments, the system scans and stores the image of all currency notes and/or all documents associated with a transaction. A benefit of such a system is if a customer disputes the amount of a deposit, because of the system, the bank can easily obtain the scanned images of every document deposited to verify whether the amount credited to the customer's account was correct. In these embodiments, it is contemplated that the memory may be located in the scanning device 1110, or it may be located in the first computer 1130 or at both locations.
In another alternative embodiment, the first computer 1130 may be linked via a telephone line or other communication link 1140 to a second computer 1150, which may be a customer's computer, such as a home computer or a computer located at a retail store or an office. The second computer 1150 may also be a computer at another bank or financial institution. The communication link 1140 may be over a public line, a private line, or it may be a wireless link. In this embodiment, the images of documents associated with a transaction are forwarded to the customer as a receipt. According to some embodiments, the first and second computers 1130, 1150 may be linked via the internet. For example, using the internet, a bank may e-mail the information related to a transaction, including, for example, the images of the scanned documents to a customer's computer. In another embodiment, the images are downloaded onto a CD, a disk, a tape, or other storage media by the bank and forwarded to the customer. This may be done at the document scanning device 1110 at the time of deposit, or it may be done later at the bank and the CD, disk, tape, or other storage media may be sent to the customer via regular mail. In both of these embodiments, the document scanning device 1110 is useful because it provides the customer with a detailed record of the transaction shortly after the transaction occurs. The document scanning device 1110 is also beneficial since it stores the serial numbers, which may useful for tracking currency bills as they move through the system. Another benefit of the present disclosure is the usefulness in locating counterfeit bills throughout a region. The various financial institutions in a given region, for example San Francisco or the United States, may all use the same database having the counterfeit serial numbers and/or other counterfeit bill identifications, such as plate numbers and city codes. This way, the financial institutions within the region benefit whenever one financial institution discovers a new counterfeit.
In an embodiment illustrated in
Turning now to
Another embodiment is a pyramid structure, depicted in
According to some embodiments, such as in
In some embodiments, the document scanning devices illustrated in the present disclosure can have software that allows a customer or operator to input instructions into the document scanning device for documents whose images are unreadable by, for example, the OCR algorithms.
According to some embodiments, a software algorithm can enhance the document image obtained from the image scanner for situations in which the OCR algorithm cannot extract, for example, the serial number on a currency bill. Following enhancement, the enhanced image can be reprocessed using the OCR algorithm until the digits in the document are successfully obtained. The image enhancement can be executed automatically or manually on a document scanning system. In one embodiment, an enhancement algorithm is triggered when an initial OCR algorithm cannot identify a character or a string of characters from an image. The image is sent to a post-processing enhancement routine. The enhancement routine can include adjusting the image by, for example, changing the contrast or some other image enhancement techniques. The OCR algorithm can then reprocess the enhanced image to extract the desired character or string of characters.
According to some embodiments, the document scanning devices of the present disclosure may have one or more output receptacles, such as illustrated in
According to some embodiments, imaging of documents by the document scanning device can provide additional efficiency to the document inspection process. For imaged documents, the operator can view the full or partial image of the document that can, for example, be displayed on a monitor or other display device. The operator can then make any corrections to the scanned information using a control panel or other data entry device. Following corrective action by the operator, the document in the holding receptacle can then be combined with the rest of the processed documents. Since the corrective action is made using an image of the document, the operator can be remote from the document scanning device where the document scanning device is in communication with the display and data entry device being used by the operator. If corrective action for the document requiring attention cannot be made using an image of the document, the operator can still visually inspect the document from the holding receptacle. For embodiments with a single input receptacle and a single output receptacle, such as the document scanning devices illustrated in
According to some embodiments, the denomination of a document of concern may not be included in a total amount that may be calculated for a processed stack of currency documents or checks. In certain embodiments, after the document of concern is further analyzed and determined to be authentic by an operator reviewing an image of the document or physically inspecting the document, the operator can input the denomination of the document into the document processing system. The denomination that was input can then be added to the corresponding total for the stack of documents from which the document of concern was identified.
According to some embodiments, the use of imaging-based technology of the present disclosure can be further used to enhance the procedures for remote deposits, such as deposits from ATMs, retail locations, branch banks or other financial processing centers. For example, for the process in
a is a flow chart according to certain embodiments of the present disclosure. At step 1250, a person approaches a scanning device. The person wants to deposit currency bills into a checking account at Bank A. Next, at step 1255, the person indicates on the scanning device what he wants to do (deposit money) and where (account number at Bank A). This may be similar to how a person would use a standard ATM, with the machine reading a card for certain information (bank name and account number) and the customer inputting other information (what they want done and how much money).
Once the machine has the information, it may instruct the person to insert the bills into an input receptacle (step 1260). In this example, the person has deposited ten currency bills totaling $141 (one fifty, three twenties, one ten, four fives, and one single). At step 1265, the bills are then transported one by one past an image scanner which scans each bill as described above. An image file is created containing the image of each currency bill and its serial number (step 1268). The bills are then denominated at step 1270. In one embodiment, correction to the unreadable OCR characters (step 1272) can be completed for unreadable currency bill serial numbers, as an example, as described above. Serial numbers of the bills are then compared to counterfeit serial numbers in a list (step 1275). In this example, none of the bills contain serial numbers that match the list of counterfeit serial numbers. Therefore, the $141 is credited to the person's account at Bank A (step 1280). At step 1285, the image files of the currency bills are communicated to Bank A for storage. It is also contemplated that the denomination of the currency bills may be determined prior to or concurrently with the counterfeit testing.
Turning now to
Once the machine has the information, it may instruct the person to insert the checks into an input receptacle (step 1260b). In this example, the person has deposited four checks totaling $141 (one for sixty six dollars, one for fifty dollars, one for twenty dollars, and one for five dollars). At step 1265b, the checks are then transported one by one past an image scanner which scans each check as described above. An image file is created containing the image of each check (step 1268b). The amounts of the checks are then obtained by reading the courtesy amount (CAR) and/or the legal amount at step 1270b. In one embodiment, correction to unreadable characters (step 1272) from the scans of the checks can be completed for unreadable account and/or check numbers, as an example, as described above. The ABA, account and/or check numbers of the checks are then compared to the flagged numbers in the memory (step 1275b). In this example, none of the data matches data in the memory. Therefore, the $141 is credited to the person's account at Bank A (step 1280b). At step 1285b, the image files of the checks are communicated to Bank A for storage. It is also contemplated that the denomination of the checks may be determined prior to or concurrently with the counterfeit testing.
Turning to
Referring back to
According to some embodiments, the image scanner is located within the device 1300, desirably positioned adjacent to the transport path such as above the transport mechanism 1320 or transport path. As the plurality of currency notes 1335 are processed, the image scanner 1340 obtains a image of each of the plurality of currency notes 1335 being processed by the device 1300. It is contemplated that in certain embodiments, the image scanner 1340 obtains an image of the entire currency note, including both sides of the currency note 1335. The device 1300 can include two image scanners, one above the transport mechanism 1320 or transport path and the other below the transport mechanism 1320 or transport path, similar to the image scanners 460a,b depicted in
The transport mechanism 1320 transports each of the plurality of the currency notes 1335, one at a time, from the input receptacle 1310 along a transport path to the image scanner 1340 for scanning. Then the transport mechanism 1320 transports each of the plurality of currency notes 1335 from the image scanner 1340 along a transport path to the output receptacle 1330. In certain embodiments, it is contemplated that the transport mechanism 1320 can transport the plurality of currency notes 1335 at rates of approximately 1,000 to 1,200 currency notes per minute with the wide-edge of the currency note leading. It is also contemplated that the transport mechanism can transport the plurality of currency notes 1335 at rates of approximately 500 to 600 currency notes per minute with the narrow-edge of the currency note leading.
It is also contemplated that in certain embodiments, a currency note processing device can include one image scanner and a transport mechanism that can transport a plurality of currency notes past or through the image scanner two times, such that a device with one image scanner may obtain an image of both sides of each of the plurality of currency notes.
The controller 1350 can be coupled to the transport mechanism 1320, the image scanner 1340, and/or the processor 1390. The controller 1350 generally communicates with the processor 1390 to control and/or vary the timing of the image scanner 1340 and the transport mechanism 1320.
The memory 1360 can be coupled to the image scanner 1340 and adapted to store the image or the image snippet(s) of the plurality of currency notes. The memory 1360 can further be adapted to store computer-type programs, such as, for example, cropping algorithms, deskewing algorithms, denominating algorithms, authentication algorithms, denomination images, and extraction algorithms. Extraction algorithms can include, for example, OCR, CAR, LAR, bar code recognition, or fitness criteria recognition. The memory 1360 is further adapted to store any data extracted from the images, such as, for example, a serial number, a series number, a denomination, a signatory, or a plate number. Other data that can be stored may include, for example, Federal Reserve Bank, bar code ticket number, ticket amount, account number, bank routing number, check date, ticket date, time, country code, MICR data, authentication features.
The processor 1390 can be coupled to the memory 1360 and the controller 1350. The processor 1390 can communicate with the controller 1350 to coordinate the timing of the image scanner 1340 and the transport mechanism 1320.
In certain embodiments, it is contemplated that the processor 1390 applies one or more denominating algorithms to the stored images, or image snippets, to denominate the plurality of currency notes 1335. The processor 1390 may create image snippets by executing a cropping algorithm or a computer program/code that searches the image for the edges of the currency note. Once the program determines the edges of the currency note, the program can then crop, or virtually cut, the image of the currency note out from the superfluous surrounding image.
The processor 1390 can also execute a deskewing program/code, which uses geometry and mathematical formulas and/or equations to orient the image of the currency note such that currency note edges are squared up. Squaring up an image's edges allows the processor 1390 to more readily position a grid or coordinate system on the image, where the origin of the coordinate system is, for example, placed at one corner of the currency note image and the x-axis and y-axis are positioned along the wider and narrower edges of the currency note, respectively. The coordinate system can also be placed with the origin at the center of the currency note image with the x-axis and y-axis parallel to the wider and narrower edges of the currency note, respectfully. It is contemplated that in certain embodiments, the processor can place a coordinate system on the image of the currency note without first deskewing the image. It is further contemplated that the coordinate system can be positioned with the origin of the x-axis and y-axis placed at any known position on the image of the currency note. In certain embodiments, the processor can directly position a coordinate system on the currency note image, or image snippet, without deskewing and/or cropping the original image generated by the image scanner.
According to certain embodiments, the processor locates, crops and/or deskews a portion of the currency note image. One non-limiting example of an image portion is depicted in
One non-limiting example of a denominating algorithm used to denominate U.S. currency bills is a luminance algorithm that uses data to denominate currency bills. The luminance algorithm can sample and digitally process an image or a portion of an image (e.g., image portion 1539) of a currency bill to determine the currency bill's correct denomination. The luminance algorithm can determine or calculate the luminance of pixels in sample areas 1539a-n of the image or image portion 1539. For example, the luminance algorithm can calculate the average luminance of the pixels in sample areas (e.g., 1539a-n) having a width w and a height Ah, depicted in
In certain embodiments, the average luminance data samples obtained can be subjected to digital processing, including a normalizing process to deaccentuate variations due to “contrast” fluctuations in the scanned image of the printed pattern or indicia existing on the surface of the scanned currency bill. The collection of normalized average luminance data samples represent a characteristic pattern that is fairly unique for a given currency bill denomination and incorporates sufficient distinguishing features between characteristic patterns for different currency denominations so as to accurately differentiate therebetween.
It can be desirable to generate and store a series of master characteristic patterns using standard currency bills for each denomination of currency that is to be detected. The “standard” currency bills used to generate the master characteristic patterns are desirably currency bills that are slightly used bills. According to certain embodiments, two characteristic patterns are generated and stored within the device memory for each detectable currency denomination. The stored patterns can correspond, respectively, to optical scans performed on the non-face surface of a currency bill along “forward” and “reverse” directions relative to the pattern printed on the currency bill. In certain embodiments it is contemplated that any number of a variety of patterns are generated and stored within the device memory to be used to denominate the currency bills. For example, in certain embodiments, the device stores four characteristic patterns for each denomination of bill being processed; two of the patterns for the non-face surface and two of the patterns for the face surface of the currency bill.
According to some embodiments, the processor is adapted to identify seven (7) different denominations of U.S. currency, i.e., $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50 and $100. Accordingly, a master set of, for example, 14 different characteristic patterns can be stored within the system memory for subsequent denomination purposes (e.g., seven denominations for which the processor can identify two characteristics for each denomination). In certain embodiments, the processor can execute the luminance algorithm to generate a characteristic pattern to compare with, for example, each of the 14 prestored characteristic luminance patterns. According to some embodiments, the processor then generates, for each comparison, a correlation number representing the extent of similarity between corresponding sample areas of the plurality of average luminance data samples for the compared patterns. According to some such embodiments, denomination identification is based on designating the scanned bill as belonging to the denomination corresponding to the stored characteristic luminance pattern for which the correlation number resulting from pattern comparison is determined to be the highest. Other denominating techniques are known to those skilled in the art and fall within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, various currency processing equipment which denominate currency notes have been developed and/or sold. It is contemplated that the denominating algorithms therein may be used in conjunction with the present disclosure such as by examining the image of a currency note and/or portion(s) thereof as opposed to the signals generated by one or more detectors such as optical detectors. It is further contemplated that up to four or more characteristic patterns per denomination can be identified or prestored. It is also contemplated that certain series of certain note denominations can also have unique characteristic patterns that can be identified and/or prestored.
It is contemplated that in certain instances the device may return a no-call result when comparing the luminance data samples with the stored master characteristic patterns, thus failing to denominate the currency bill. According to some embodiments, in the case of a no-call, the processor and/or controller can direct the transport mechanism to off-sort the currency bill to a different output receptacle than the one for properly denominated currency bills.
In certain embodiments, the sample areas (e.g., 1539a-n) can overlap.
Referring back to
According to certain embodiments, the image scanner 1340 works with the processor 1390 to extract information from either the original image, a cropped image, a deskewed image, or an image snippet. The information extracted from the currency note image can be the same as or similar to the information extracted from the currency bill depicted in, for example,
According to certain embodiments, the image scanner 1340 and/or processor 1390 can extract information from currency note images using one or more optical character recognition (“OCR”) algorithms. An OCR algorithm can include locating specific fields within the image or image snippet and determining or extracting character information associated with the currency note. It is contemplated that in certain embodiments different methods of extracting desired information from currency notes can be used (e.g., CAR, LAR, bar code, etc.). Extracted information can be stored in a text file and represented by, for example, one or more ASCII characters.
In certain embodiments, the currency note processing device 1300 may store extracted information in memory 1360. According to some embodiments, the processor 1390 is adapted to compare the extracted information with counterfeit information stored in memory 1360 to identify counterfeit currency notes. One non-limiting example of counterfeit information is a serial number of a known or suspected counterfeit currency note. In certain embodiments, when the extracted serial number matches, or substantially matches the serial number of a known or suspected counterfeit currency bill, the device 1300 can transport such a currency bill to a different output receptacle than the one used for non-suspect currency bills. According to some embodiments, the device comprises an operator interface configured to permit an operator to set how many characters of the extracted serial number must match with a serial number on the counterfeit list before the device off-sorts the currency bill.
In certain embodiments it is contemplated, the processor identifies counterfeit notes by comparing data from a currency note, for example, serial number, series number, plate number, etc. with data from a list containing the same or substantially similar data associated with counterfeit or suspect counterfeit notes. It is contemplated that the list of data associated with counterfeit and suspected counterfeit currency notes can be stored in a number of locations including the memory 1360, a separate memory located in the device 1300, or a separate memory located in a separate device/machine communicatively linked to the device 1300. In certain embodiments, the device 1300 is connected to a communications link to automatically or manually download an updated counterfeit and suspect counterfeit list from a remote database. It is contemplated that according to some embodiments, the device connects with the remote database in real-time. According to some embodiments, the connection to the remote database is a permanent connection and according to some embodiments, the connection is an on-demand connection. For example, according to some embodiments, the device is adapted to automatically receive real-time updated counterfeit or suspect counterfeit information, as such information becomes available. Alternatively, an operator can decide when to connect the device via the communications link to download updated counterfeit or suspect counterfeit information to a local database stored in a local memory such as a memory residing in the device 1300 and a memory coupled to the device 1300 and physically located near the device 1300. The local database may store all or part of the counterfeit data stored in the remote data based. For example, according to some embodiments, the local database stores only a list of serial numbers and their corresponding denominations associated with counterfeit bills. It is also contemplated that the comparison of serial numbers may be completed on a processor external to device 1300 that is linked to the device 1300 and a memory storing counterfeit information.
In certain embodiments, the device 1300 executes or deploys a correction routine to automatically adjust an error in the information extracted from the image or image snippet. The correction routine can be in the form of a computer code or program stored in the memory 1360. For example, when one or more digits in a serial number can not be determined with an adequate degree of confidence using an initial OCR algorithm, a correction routine may be employed to examine the image of the digit in more detail. For example, according to some embodiments, a correction routine may employ a image smoothing and/or contrast adjustment routine before applying an OCR algorithm to the image of the questioned digit(s) again. The automatic correction routine can be implemented in the background as the device 1300 processes a plurality of currency notes 1335. Alternatively, the automatic correction routine can be implemented on the demand of an operator, including after the device 1300 physically processes a plurality of currency notes 1335 (i.e., post-processing). For example, according to some embodiments, the device 1300 automatically runs a correction routine to correct errors or omissions in the desired information extracted from the image or image snippet of an imaged currency note while continuing the imaging and processing of subsequent currency notes in a stack of currency notes 1335. Alternatively, according to some embodiments, the device 1300 automatically runs a correction routine to correct errors or omissions in the desired information extracted from the image or image snippet after a plurality of currency notes 1335 are fully processed. Automatically correcting the errors after the device 1300 physically processes the plurality of currency notes 1335 allows the processor 1390 and memory 1360 to use more resources. For example, the processor 1390 will have additional processing power and memory to run additional and/or larger more complex extraction algorithms.
According to certain embodiments, the device 1300 can automatically correct an error in the desired extracted information while the device 1300 simultaneously processes the plurality of currency notes 1335. An example of error correction of extracted information can include using additional algorithms or optionally run the same extraction algorithm multiple times on the currency note image or image snippet(s) to correct errors. According to some embodiments, the controller 1350 and/or processor 1390 can be adapted to cause the transport mechanism 1320 to vary the transport speed to allow for additional time for the algorithms operating on the processor to automatically correct the errors.
According to certain embodiments, the currency note processing device 1300 can further include a buffer memory (not shown). The buffer memory may be additional memory in the memory 1360 of the device 1300. Alternatively, the buffer memory can be a separate memory unit coupled to the memory 1360. The buffer memory can be in the form of, for example, a RAM memory, a hard drive memory, or a flash memory.
The buffer memory may be coupled to the controller 1350 and/or processor 1390 such that the controller 1350 can reduce the rate the transport mechanism 1320 transports the plurality of currency notes 1335 from the input receptacle 1310 to the image scanner 1340 when the buffer memory approaches a buffer memory limit. The buffer memory limit can be a predetermined percentage of memory in the device 1300. For example, the operator or the manufacturer may set the buffer memory limit within a range of 50 to 95 percent of total memory in the device 1300. When the device 1300 processes a plurality of currency notes 1335, the device 1300 can use a substantial amount of processing power and memory. The buffer memory gives the device 1300 extra memory to use while processing the plurality of currency notes 1335 to minimize the overwriting of images and image snippets of previously processed currency notes stored in the memory 1360. Once the buffer memory limit is reached, the controller 1350 can reduce the rate of the transport mechanism 1320 from, for example, 1000 currency notes per minute to 500 currency notes per minute or even lower to allow the memory to free up and allow the device to continue to process currency notes. The rate change of the transport mechanism can occur incrementally, such as, for example, from 1,000 notes per minute to 900 notes per minute to 800 notes per minute and then back to 1,000 notes per minute once the memory becomes available. According to some embodiments, slowing down the transport mechanism gives the processor more time to finish analyzing queued images or image portions. Once the processor determines that it is done analyzing certain images or image portions, such images or image portions may be overwritten with new images or image portions. As the processor catches up with processing stored images/image portions and more memory becomes available to be overwritten with new images/image portions, the processor may cause the speed of the transport mechanism to be gradually increased until the transport mechanism again is operating at its optimal speed.
According to certain embodiments, the currency note processing device 1300 is programmed to stop the transport mechanism 1320 from transporting any of the plurality of currency notes 1335 from the input receptacle 1310 to the image scanner 1340 when the buffer memory approaches a buffer memory overrun condition. The buffer memory overrun condition can be a predetermined percentage of memory in the device 1300. For example, the operator or the manufacturer may set the buffer memory overrun condition within a range of 95 to 100 percent of total memory in the device 1300.
It is contemplated that according to certain embodiments, the currency note processing device described herein may also be a document processing device adaptable to receive a plurality of documents containing intermingled currency notes and checks. The device can be adapted to receive the plurality of intermingled documents with a wide-edge or a narrow-edge of the plurality of documents being initially fed into the document processing device (e.g. wide-edge leading or narrow-edge leading). It is contemplated that in certain embodiments, the input receptacle can be adapted to receive a portion of the plurality of intermingled currency notes and checks with the wide-edge leading and further capable of receiving other documents with the narrow-edge leading.
For example, the input receptacle can be adapted to receive a plurality of documents including currency bills and standard size checks fed with their wide-edge leading, and larger business checks fed with their narrow-edge leading. According to some embodiments, minimizing the input receptacle width to only accommodate the width of currency notes (e.g., U.S. currency bills) and consumer size checks (e.g., 2.5″×6″), as opposed to large commercial checks (e.g., 8.25″×3″), results in a smaller overall width of the device. However, these dimensions still allow the device to accept the larger business checks in a narrow-edge leading manner. Likewise, according to some embodiments, such a device is provided which has a smaller footprint given its shorter width. According to some such embodiments, the document processing device accepts currency notes and standard checks in a wide-edge leading manner and commercial checks in a narrow-edge leading manner and employs a shorter transport path associated with a wide-edge leading orientation and is contained in a device having a smaller footprint. It is contemplated that in certain embodiments the device can process intermingled currency notes and checks in the wide-edge leading manner at a rate of up to approximately 1,000 to 1,200 documents per minute, with the processing rate ranging from approximately 250 documents per minute (predominantly checks) up to 1,200 documents per minute (predominantly currency). It is also contemplated that the same device may process the larger business checks in a narrow-edge leading manner at a rate of up to 100 documents per minute.
In certain embodiments, a document processing device can identify all no-call documents. No-call documents include currency notes the device fails to properly denominate or to extract desired information (e.g., serial number), or checks the device fails to completely process (e.g., extract the amount of the check, or extract the MICR data). In certain embodiments, the document processing device is further adapted to identify and sort/separate all no-call documents from properly processed documents by placing the no-call documents in a separate output receptacle. For example, in certain embodiments, the device can identify all no-call checks and sort them into an output receptacle that is different than the output receptacle storing the other documents (including properly processed currency notes and check and no-call currency notes). According to some embodiments, separating the no-call checks from the other documents spares the operator from searching the stack of output documents to find the no-call checks when needed for further processing. In some embodiments, the document processing device may stack and/or store the processed currency notes in one output receptacle and stack and/or store the processed checks in a different output receptacle.
In certain embodiments, the image scanner can obtain an image of at least one portion of the document, also referred to as a snippet. Some non-limiting examples of snippets include, but are not limited to, an image of MICR data on a check or a portion thereof, an image of a barcode on a document (e.g., check or currency note), an image of a serial number on a currency bill, an image of any portion of a currency bill or check.
In certain embodiments, the processor and/or the image scanner executes a cropping algorithm and a deskewing algorithm to crop and deskew one or more portions of a scanned image, which results in one or more image snippets. In certain embodiments, it is contemplated that the processor denominates the currency notes by applying one or more denominating algorithms to the stored images, or image snippets in the same or similar manner as the currency note processing device 1300 described above. The processor can also denominate the currency notes by comparing the scanned image or image snippet(s) with the denomination image in the same or similar manner as described above in relation to the currency note processing device 1300. The processor can also be adapted to process the checks using an extraction algorithm. Extraction algorithms can be adapted to determine a check amount; determine a routing, a bank account, and a check number; determine a payee and/or a drawer and drawee name; and determine an endorser name and storing such extracted data in, for example, a text file.
According to certain embodiments, the image scanner generally works with the processor to extract information from either the original image, the cropped and/or deskewed image, or the image snippet(s). For currency bills, the information extracted from the document image can be the same as or similar to the information extracted from the currency bill depicted in
In certain embodiments, the document processing device can store the extracted information from the image or image snippet in the memory. The processor can then compare the extracted information with information identifying a counterfeit or forged document also stored in the memory. To determine a counterfeit currency bill, the processor can compare, for example, the extracted serial number with a list of known or suspected counterfeit serial numbers. To determine a forged check, the processor can compare, for example, the extracted routing number with a list of known or suspected routing numbers connected with fraudulent activity or forgery. The processor can compare the extracted information with the lists of known or suspected counterfeit and forged documents in the same or similar manner as processor 1390 described above. If the extracted information matches, or substantially matches, for example, the serial number or routing number of a known or suspected counterfeit or forged document(s), the document processing device can transport such a document to a different output receptacle than the one used for non-suspect documents.
It is contemplated that the operator can, for example, determine how many characters of the extracted serial number must match with a serial number on the counterfeit list before the device off-sorts the currency bill into a different output receptacle. It is further contemplated that in certain embodiments, the processor can compare other extracted information from the documents with a list of the same type of information relating to known or suspected counterfeit or forged documents. For example, the processor can compare an extracted bank account number with a list of bank account numbers known or suspected to be connected with fraud or forgery.
It is contemplated that the list of known and suspected counterfeit and forged documents can be stored in a number of locations including the device's memory, in a separate memory located in the device, or in a separate memory located in a separate device/machine. In certain embodiments, the device can connect to a communications link to automatically or manually download updated lists of known and suspected counterfeit and forged documents in the same or similar manner as the device 1300 described above.
In certain embodiments, the processor can be configured to execute a correction routine that is capable of automatically adjusting an error in the information extracted from the image or image snippet. The correction routine functions in the same or similar manner as the correction routine described above in relation to the currency note procession device 1300.
It is contemplated that according to certain embodiments, the device can be configured to process checks containing a MICR code parallel to a narrow-edge or shorter side of the check. Additionally, it is contemplated that the device can be configured to process a check having a barcode, wherein the barcode is either parallel to the wide-edge or the narrow-edge of the check. The barcode can contain a variety of information, including but not limited to, routing number, account number, check number, drawer information, drawee information, etc. The processor and/or image scanner can execute one of the extraction algorithms to extract the MICR data from the image or snippet. In certain embodiments, the scanner can be configured to directly scan and retrieve the information encoded in the barcode.
According to certain embodiments, the document processing device further includes a communications link. The communications link can connect the device to a network system. The processor can be configured to compare extracted information with information on the network system. For example, the network system can contain a list of known or suspect counterfeit documents and/or known or suspected forgery documents. The documents can be identified by, for example, serial numbers for currency bills and by routing or bank account numbers for forgery documents. In certain embodiments, the device can off-sort documents matching a document on the network system list. It is contemplated that the network system can be updated in real-time.
According to some embodiments, the communications link can connect the device to a banking network. The processor can be configured to transmit the scanned images, snippets, and/or extracted information to a financial institution through the banking network, also known as the send-it-forward feature. According to certain embodiments, a bank can receive transmitted images and/or extracted information and give its customer a provisional credit for the currency bills and checks sent forward electronically over the communications link.
The send-it-forward feature also allows the bank to start processing the currency bills and/or checks before the currency bills and/or checks themselves physically arrive at the bank. Thus, banks can perform counterfeit searches of the soon to be deposited currency bills' serial numbers and determine the counterfeits, if any, before the bank receives and deposits and/or credits the customer's account. The send-it-forward feature also allows the bank to start processing the checks before the physical checks are deposited with the bank. Thus, the bank can determine any forgeries, if any, as well as determine if there are sufficient funds in the drawer's account, etc. It is contemplated that the communications link can be any type of connection that allows for electronic data transfer, for example, an internet connection, a dial-up connection, an email connection, a Wi-Fi connection, a LAN connection, an Ethernet connection, a wireless connection, a Bluetooth connection, etc.
According to certain embodiments, the communications link may connect the device with a banking network wherein the processor can be configured to transmit a deposit amount to a financial institution (e.g., a bank). The bank can receive the deposit amount electronically through the communications link and store the deposit amount along with customer identifying information. Once the bank receives the plurality of physical documents from the customer, the bank can process the documents in a similar document processing device. The bank's document processing device can calculate the deposit amount and compare the bank's calculated deposit amount with the stored deposit amount sent via the communications link by the customer. If the deposit amounts of the customer and the bank match, then the device can display the deposit amount to the teller. If the deposit amounts do not match, then the deposit amount is not revealed to the teller and a message may be sent to the bank manager, the customer, or both. This embodiment is also known as blind balancing. Blind balancing deposits provides banks and bank customers with a desired fraud prevention mechanism that prevents tellers from embezzling/stealing any amount actually deposited over the customer's declared/calculated deposit amount. Blind balancing is advantageous because, for example, often a customer will think it is depositing one amount and disclose that amount to a bank (i.e., $10,000), but when the teller processes the documents the deposit amount may turnout to be greater than the amount the customer calculated. Thus, without blind balancing, a dishonest teller may easily steal the difference without raising much suspicion.
According to certain embodiments, the document processing device or system may further comprise a printer. The printer can be coupled to the document processing device to allow a user to print a receipt that documents the transaction (e.g. deposit of cash or checks). For example, in a document processing device embodied in an automated teller machine (“ATM”), a user may deposit several documents including checks and currency bills. The device can be configured to scan the documents and provide the user with an option to print a copy of the images scanned/deposited. The user may customize the printed receipt by selecting to print images of only the checks, only the currency bill serial numbers, or any combination. It is contemplated that in certain embodiments, the system comprises an interface configured to permit a user to print a receipt containing any combination of images, image snippets, and extracted information from the currency bills and/or checks.
In certain embodiments, a free standing document processing device includes a printer. According to some embodiments, the device is configured to allow a user to print a log of extracted information. The log can be a list of the serial numbers of currency bills processed, of the check routing and account numbers processed, or other information extracted from the documents.
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or more particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Each of these embodiments and variations thereof is contemplated as falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention, which is set forth in the claims following the disclosure. By way of example, the following embodiments are illustrative examples of the present disclosure.
A document processing device includes an input receptacle configured to receive a plurality of documents, an image scanner configured to obtain a document image of at least a portion of one side of each of the plurality of documents, the scanner further being configured to extract information from the document image. A transport mechanism is configured to transport each of the plurality of documents one at a time from the input receptacle passed the image scanner and to an output receptacle. A controller is coupled to the transport mechanism and to the image scanner. The controller is configured to at least partially control the transport mechanism and the image scanner. A memory is coupled to at least one of the controller and the image scanner. The memory is configured to store at least one of information extracted from the document image and master information identifying at least one of counterfeit and forged documents. A processor is coupled to the memory. The processor is configured to compare the information extracted from the document image with master information stored in the memory. The master information identifies at least one of counterfeit and forged documents. The processor is further configured to identify at least one of a suspected counterfeit and forged document based on the comparison operation. The document processing device continuously transports documents during the comparison and identification operations, and the information extracted from the document image at least partially contains character information obtained from a predetermined field of the document image. The processor contains a search routine configured to search the character information.
The device of embodiment A can also include the input receptacle having a single receptacle configured to receive intermingled currency bills and checks.
The device of embodiment B can also include the input receptacle being configured to receive currency bills and checks intermingled in a single stack of documents, with the input receptacle further being configured to transfer the currency bills into the transport mechanism in a direction perpendicular to a wider edge of said currency bill and to transfer the checks into the transport mechanism perpendicular to at least one of a wider edge and a narrower edge of the check.
The device of embodiment A can also include the image scanner having a depth of field of approximately 0.060 inches.
The device of embodiment A can also include the image scanner being capable of simultaneously scanning a front side and a back side of the documents.
The device of embodiment A can also include the transport mechanism being configured to transport the documents at a rate varying between 0 and 100 inches per second.
The device of embodiment F can also include a luminance control technique that is initiated for the image scanner when the transport mechanism is transporting documents at a non-constant rate.
The device of embodiment F can also include an image processing technique that is initiated for the image scanner when the transport mechanism is transporting documents at a non-constant rate.
The device of embodiment A can also include the transport mechanism being configured to transport the documents at a rate of up to 1,000 documents per minute.
The device of embodiment A can also include the transport mechanism being further configured to transport intermingled currency bills and checks, with the currency bills and checks being transported in a direction perpendicular to the wider edge of the currency bills and the checks.
The device of embodiment A can further include an evaluation unit configured to determine currency denomination using information extracted from a predetermined field of the document image.
The device of embodiment A can also include the image scanner being further configured to locate a field in the document image and further configured to extract characters from the field as information to be associated with the document.
The device of embodiment A can also include that at least one of the image scanner and the processor contains a correction routine configured to adjust an error in extracted information from the document image.
The device of embodiment M can also that the correction routine allows adjustment of the error by manual input into an input device.
The device of embodiment M can also include that the processor operates remotely from the image scanner.
The device of embodiment M can also include that the correction routine allows for adjustment of the error automatically.
The device of embodiment P can also include that the automatic adjustment of the error occurs after the device finishes transporting the plurality of documents, with the correction routine being capable of using additional algorithms.
The device of embodiment L can also include that the image scanner employs optical character recognition to extract characters from a field and wherein at least one of the image scanner and the processor contains a correction routine configured to adjust an error in optically-recognized extracted characters, wherein the correction routine comprises an image enhancement routine configured to process a document image followed by an extraction of characters from the document image.
The device of embodiment A can also include that the character information extracted from the documents includes serial numbers and the search routine is configured to search for partial serial numbers.
A document processing system includes a plurality of document scanning devices that extract information from document images, and a central processor remotely connected to the document scanning devices. The central processor is configured to receive the document images and the extracted information from the document scanning devices and is further configured to employ a correction routine configured to adjust an error in the extracted information from the document image.
A currency note processing device includes at least one input receptacle configured to receive a plurality of currency notes, an image scanner configured to obtain at least a partial image of at least one side of each of the plurality of currency notes, and a transport mechanism configured to transport each of the plurality of currency notes one at a time from the input receptacle to the image scanner and from the image scanner to an output receptacle. A controller is coupled to the transport mechanism and to the image scanner, the controller being configured to at least partially control the transport mechanism and the image scanner. A memory is coupled to the image scanner, the memory being configured to store the at least partial image of each of the plurality of currency notes. A processor is coupled to the memory, the processor configured to denominate the plurality of currency notes by applying a denominating algorithm to the stored at least partial image of each of the plurality of currency notes.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can also include that the input receptacle is configured to receive currency notes and transfer the currency notes into the transport mechanism in a direction perpendicular to a wider edge of the currency notes at a rate up to 1000 currency notes per minute.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can also include that the image scanner is further configured to extract information from the image of each of the plurality of currency notes.
The currency note processing device of embodiment W can also include that the extracted information uniquely identifies each of the plurality of currency notes.
The currency note processing device of embodiment W can also include that the extracted information is at least one of a serial number, a signature, a denomination, a series, a back plate, a front plate, and a print code.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can also include that the image scanner further includes an optical character recognition capability to locate a field in the document image and to extract characters from the field as information to be associated with the currency note.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can also include that the processor is further configured to denominate the plurality of currency notes by comparing the stored at least partial image with a denominating image.
The currency note processing device of embodiment W can also include that the memory is configured to store one of extracted information from the image of each of the plurality of currency notes and master information identifying counterfeit currency notes.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AB can also include that the processor is configured to compare the extracted information with the master information identifying the counterfeit currency notes. The processor can be further configured to identify at least one of a suspected counterfeit currency note based on the comparison operation.
The currency note processing device of embodiment W can also include that at least one of the image scanner and the processor contains a correction routine capable of automatically adjusting an error in the extracted information from an image.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AD can also include that the automatic adjustment of the error occurs at least partially after the device processes the plurality of currency notes using an additional algorithm.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can further include a buffer memory coupled to the memory and coupled to the controller, wherein the controller reduces the rate the transport mechanism transports the currency notes from the input receptacle to the image scanner when the buffer memory approaches a predetermined buffer limit.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AF can also include that the controller stops the transport mechanism from transporting the currency notes when the buffer memory approaches a buffer overrun condition.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can also include that at least one of the image scanner and the processor applies a deskewing algorithm for deskewing the partial image of at least one side of each of the plurality of currency notes.
The currency note processing device of embodiment U can also include that the image of at least one side of each of the plurality of currency notes is an image of an entire currency note, the processor being configured to apply a cropping algorithm to crop a portion of the image of an entire currency note.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AI can also include that the processor is configured to apply a deskewing algorithm for deskewing the cropped portion of the image.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AJ can also include that the processor is configured to apply a denominating algorithm to the cropped and the deskewed portion of the image to denominate the currency note.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AI can also include that the processor is configured to apply an extraction algorithm to the cropped and the deskewed image to extract information from the image.
The currency note processing device of embodiment AL can also include that the extracted information includes a serial number associated with a currency note.
A document processing device includes an input receptacle configured to receive a plurality of documents, an image scanner configured to obtain a document image of at least a portion of at least one side of each of the plurality of documents with the scanner further being configured to extract information from the document image of each document, and a transport mechanism configured to transport each of the plurality of documents one at a time from the input receptacle to the image scanner and from the image scanner to an output receptacle. A controller is coupled to the transport mechanism and to the image scanner, the controller configured to at least partially control the transport mechanism and the image scanner. A memory is coupled to at least one of the controller and the image scanner, the memory being configured to store the extracted information from the document image. A processor is coupled to the memory, the processor configured to execute a correction routine that applies a first algorithm for automatically adjusting errors identified in the extracted information.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also include that the input receptacle is a single input receptacle configured to receive intermingled currency notes and checks.
The document processing device of embodiment AO can also include that the transport mechanism is configured to transport the intermingled currency notes and the checks at a rate of up to 1,000 documents per minute. The currency notes and the checks are in a direction perpendicular to a wider edge of the currency notes and the checks and the device is further configured to transport the checks in a direction perpendicular to a narrower edge of the checks at a rate of about 50-100 documents per minute.
The document processing device of embodiment AO can also include that at least one of the document images includes an image of at least a portion of a MICR code.
The document processing device of embodiment AQ can also include that the image scanner extracts information from the MICR code image.
The document processing device of embodiment AO can also include that the check contains a MICR code parallel to a narrower edge of the check. The image scanner is further configured to extract information from the MICR code parallel to the narrower edge of the check.
The document processing device of embodiment AO can also include that the check contains a barcode parallel to at least one of a wider edge of the check and a narrower edge of the check. The image scanner is further configured to extract information from the barcode.
The document processing device of embodiment AU can also include that the memory is further configured to store a denominating image. The processor is further configured to compare the extracted information with the denominating image for denominating the currency notes.
The document processing device of embodiment AO can also include that the document image is an image of an entire document, and the processor crops and deskews a portion of the document image.
The document processing device of embodiment AV can also include that the processor executes a cropping algorithm and a deskewing algorithm to crop and deskew the document image.
The document processing device of embodiment AV can also include that the processor applies an algorithm to the cropped and the deskewed document image to denominate the currency notes.
The document processing device of embodiment AX can also include that the algorithm is a denominating algorithm.
The document processing device of embodiment AX can also include that the algorithm calculates a predetermined number of average luminance samples of pixels within the cropped and deskewed image.
The document processing device of embodiment AZ can also include that the processor compares the average luminance samples with at least one master characteristic pattern to denominate the currency notes.
The document processing device of embodiment AV can also include that the processor applies an algorithm to the cropped and the deskewed portion of the side of the plurality of documents to extract information from the image.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also include that the processor operates remotely to the image scanner.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also include that the image scanner is configured to locate a field within the document image and to extract characters from the field as information to be associated with a corresponding document.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also include that the automatic adjusting of the error occurs at least partially after the device processes the plurality of documents using an additional algorithm.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also include that the transport mechanism transports the documents having an error that cannot be automatically corrected to a separate output receptacle.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also include that at least one of the image scanner and the processor deskews the portion of at least one side of each of the plurality of documents.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can also further include a buffer memory coupled to the memory and coupled to the controller, wherein the controller is configured to reduce the rate the transport mechanism transports the currency notes from the input receptacle to the image scanner when the buffer memory approaches a predetermined buffer limit.
The document processing device of embodiment BH can also include that the controller is configured to stop the transport mechanism from transporting the currency notes when the buffer memory approaches a buffer overrun condition.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can further include a communications link between the document processing device and a network system, wherein the processor is further configured to compare the extracted information with information on the network system.
The document processing device of embodiment BJ can also include that the information on the network system is a suspect list of at least one of known counterfeit documents and known forgery documents.
The document processing device of embodiment BK can also include that the controller is configured to cause the transport mechanism to transport documents matching at least one of the known counterfeits and the known forgery documents to a separate output receptacle.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can further include a communications link between the document processing device and a banking network, wherein the processor is further configured to transmit at least one of the extracted information and the document image to a financial institution over the banking network.
The document processing device of embodiment BM can also include that the processor is configured to transmit at least one of the document images and the extracted information to a bank for at least one of processing the checks, denominating the currency notes, comparing the currency notes to known counterfeits, and comparing the checks to known forgeries.
The document processing device of embodiment BM can also include that the processor is configured to transmit at least one of the document images and the extracted information to a bank for a provisional credit to a customer account.
The document processing device of embodiment BM can also include that the processor is configured to transmit a deposit amount for the plurality of documents to a banking device to allow a financial institution to perform a blind balancing of the plurality of documents.
The document processing device of embodiment BP can also include that the blind balancing includes displaying the deposit amount of the plurality of documents only if the plurality of documents balances with the deposit amount transmitted to the banking device.
The document processing device of embodiment AN can further include a printer for printing at least one of a portion of the document image and a portion of the extracted information.
The document processing device of embodiment BR can also include that the document processing device is an automated banking machine configured to print a receipt including at least one of a portion of the extracted information and a portion of the document image.
The document processing device of embodiment BS can also include that the receipt further includes customer identifying information.
The document processing device of embodiment BS can also include that the automated banking machine is an automated teller machine.
A document processing method includes receiving a plurality of documents in an input receptacle, obtaining a document image of at least a portion of one side of each of the plurality of documents, extracting information from the document image, transporting each of the plurality of documents one at a time from the input receptacle to an output receptacle, storing at least one of information extracted from the document image and master information identifying at least one of counterfeit and forged documents, identifying suspect documents by comparing the information extracted from the document image with the master information identifying at least one of counterfeit and forged documents, and searching the information extracted from the document image for character data extracted from a predetermined field of the document image.
The document processing method of embodiment BV can also include that the plurality of documents are continuously transported one at a time from the input receptacle to the output receptacle.
A currency note processing method includes the acts of receiving a plurality of documents in at least one input receptacle, obtaining at least a partial image of at least one side of each of the plurality of currency notes, transporting each of the plurality of currency notes one at a time from the input receptacle to an output receptacle, storing the at least partial image, and denominating the plurality of currency notes using the stored at least partial image.
A document processing method includes the acts of receiving a plurality of documents in an input receptacle, obtaining a document image of at least a portion of at least one side of each of the plurality of documents, extracting information from the document image, transporting each of the plurality of documents one at a time from the input receptacle to an output receptacle, storing the information extracted from the document image, and automatically correcting errors in the information extracted from the document image.
A computer-readable medium is encoded with instructions for processing a plurality of documents in a document processing system. The instructions include extracting information from a document image obtained from at least a portion of one side of each of the plurality of documents, controlling a transport mechanism that transports each of the plurality of documents one at a time along a transport path from an input receptacle to an output receptacle, controlling an image scanner located along the transport path between the input receptacle and the output receptacle where the image scanner is configured to obtain the document image, identifying suspect documents by comparing the information extracted from the document image with master information identifying at least one of counterfeit and forged documents, and searching the extracted information for character data obtained from a predetermined field of the document image.
A computer-readable medium is associated with a document processing system. The computer-readable medium is encoded with instructions for processing a plurality of currency notes. The instructions include extracting information from at least a partial image of at least one side of each of the plurality of currency notes, controlling a transport mechanism and an image scanner where the transport mechanism transports each of the plurality of currency notes one at a time from an input receptacle to an output receptacle and the image scanner is used to obtain the currency note image, and denominating the plurality of currency notes using the at least partial image.
A computer-readable medium is associated with a document processing system. The computer-readable medium is encoded with instructions for processing a plurality of documents. The instructions include extracting information from a document image obtained from at least a portion of at least one side of each of the plurality of documents, controlling a transport mechanism that transports each of the plurality of documents one at a time along a transport path from an input receptacle to an output receptacle, controlling an image scanner located along the transport path between the input receptacle and the output receptacle where the image scanner is configured to obtain the document image, and automatically correcting errors identified in the information extracted from the document image.
This application is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/044,720, filed Mar. 7, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,204,293, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/905,965, filed Mar. 9, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/022,752, filed Jan. 22, 2008, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2669998 | Buchholz | Feb 1954 | A |
| 2750949 | Kulo et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
| 2835260 | Buchholz | May 1958 | A |
| 2936684 | Simjian | May 1960 | A |
| 3104314 | Simjian | Sep 1963 | A |
| 3148932 | Simjian | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3150912 | Simjian | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3246295 | DeClaris et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3280974 | Riddle et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3443107 | Modglin | May 1969 | A |
| 3480785 | Aufderheide | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3496370 | Haville et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3509535 | Berube | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3612835 | Andrews et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3618765 | Cooper et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3656615 | Ptacek | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3679314 | Mustert | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3715031 | Okkonen | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3725667 | Schwartz | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3764899 | Peterson et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3778628 | Novak et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3782543 | Martelli et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3798603 | Wahlberg | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3800078 | Cochran et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3806710 | Shigemori et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3815021 | Kerr | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3842281 | Goodrich | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3870629 | Carter et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3906449 | Marchak | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3930582 | Gartner et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3966047 | Steiner | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3976198 | Carnes, Jr. et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4023011 | Nakajima et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4027142 | Paup et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4040010 | Crane | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4041456 | Ott et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4096991 | Iguchi | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4109238 | Creekmore | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4114027 | Slater | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4114804 | Jones et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4147430 | Gorgone et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4166945 | Inoyama et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4179685 | O'Maley | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4180798 | Komori et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4187463 | Kivenson | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4187498 | Creekmore | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4197986 | Nagata | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4201978 | Nally | May 1980 | A |
| 4205780 | Burns et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4231014 | Ponzio | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4231561 | Kaneko et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4237378 | Jones | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4250806 | Boyson et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4255651 | Phillips | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4264808 | Owens et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4275874 | DiBlasio | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4277774 | Fujii et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4283708 | Lee | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4288781 | Sellner et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4302781 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4310885 | Azcua et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4311914 | Huber | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4313598 | DiBlasio | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4326636 | Kawakami | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4334619 | Horino et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4337864 | McLean | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4348656 | Gorgone et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4349111 | Shah et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4352988 | Ishida | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4355300 | Weber | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4355369 | Garvin | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4356473 | Freudenthal | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4360034 | Davila et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4381447 | Horvath et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4383540 | De Meyer et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4386432 | Nakamura et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4396902 | Warthan et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4416299 | Bergman | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4420153 | Winkler et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4435834 | Pauli et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4441205 | Berkin et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4442541 | Finkel et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4449240 | Yoshida | May 1984 | A |
| 4461028 | Okubo | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4464786 | Nishito et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4464787 | Fish et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| RE31692 | Tyburski et al. | Oct 1984 | E |
| 4479049 | Hirose | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4480177 | Allen | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4482058 | Steiner | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4487306 | Nao et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4490846 | Ishida et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4513439 | Gorgone et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4521008 | Granzow et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4523330 | Cain | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4530067 | Dorr | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4538719 | Gray et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4539702 | Oka | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542829 | Emery et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4543969 | Rasmussen | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4544266 | Antes | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4547896 | Ohtombe et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4553222 | Kurland et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4553846 | Hilton et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4556140 | Okada | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4558224 | Gober | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4559451 | Curl | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4563771 | Gorgone et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4567370 | Falls | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4569421 | Sandstedt | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4582172 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4584529 | Aoyama | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4587412 | Apisdorf | May 1986 | A |
| 4587434 | Roes et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4590606 | Rohrer | May 1986 | A |
| 4592090 | Curl et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4593184 | Bryce | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4594664 | Hashimoto | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4602332 | Hirose et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4605926 | Onishi et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4611345 | Ohnishi et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4617457 | Granzow et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4617458 | Bryce | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4628194 | Dobbins et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4630813 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4645936 | Gorgone | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4653647 | Hashimoto | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4658289 | Nagano et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4676343 | Humble et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677682 | Miyagawa et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4678072 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4680803 | Dilella | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4685141 | Hoque et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4686357 | Douno et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4694963 | Takesako | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4697071 | Hiraoka et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4700368 | Munn et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4716456 | Hosaka | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4733308 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4735289 | Kenyon | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4743743 | Fukatsu | May 1988 | A |
| 4743974 | Lockwood | May 1988 | A |
| 4748679 | Gold et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4749087 | Buttifant | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4753625 | Okada | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4764725 | Bryce | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4764976 | Kallin et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4768100 | Kunishima et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774663 | Musmanno et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4782328 | Denlinger | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4784274 | Mori et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4803347 | Sugahara et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4806709 | Evans | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4811004 | Person et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817176 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4821332 | Durham | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823393 | Kawakami | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4825246 | Fukuchi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4827531 | Milford | May 1989 | A |
| 4837842 | Holt | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4841358 | Kammoto et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4843219 | Franchi | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4851616 | Wales et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4877230 | Winkler et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4880096 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4881268 | Uchida et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4883181 | Yoshikawa | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4888812 | Dinan et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4903953 | Winkler et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905839 | Yuge et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4905840 | Yuge et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4908516 | West | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4922109 | Bercovitz et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4928094 | Smith | May 1990 | A |
| 4931782 | Jackson | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4947441 | Hara et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4948174 | Thomson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954697 | Kokubun et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4958235 | Sims et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4960981 | Benton et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4970655 | Winn et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4973851 | Lee | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4980543 | Hara et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4984280 | Abe | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4992860 | Hamaguchi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996604 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5001766 | Baird | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5010238 | Kadono et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5023782 | Lutz et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025483 | Dinan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027415 | Hara et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5040226 | Elischer et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047871 | Meyer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053607 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5054621 | Murphy et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5055834 | Chiba | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063599 | Concannon et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5064999 | Okamoto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5068519 | Bryce | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5076441 | Gerlier | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5091961 | Baus, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5097517 | Holt | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5105364 | Kawamura et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5105601 | Horiguchi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5114381 | Ueda et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5119433 | Will | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5120944 | Kern et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122754 | Gotaas | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5134663 | Kozlowski | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5135115 | Miller et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5144115 | Yoshida | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146067 | Sloan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146512 | Weideman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151607 | Crane et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5154272 | Nishiumi et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159548 | Caslavka | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163672 | Mennie | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163868 | Adams et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167313 | Dobbins et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5179517 | Sarbin et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5183142 | Latchinian et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5184115 | Black et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5184709 | Nishiumi et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5186334 | Fukudome et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5187750 | Behera | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5191525 | LeBrun et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193121 | Elischer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5198976 | Form et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5199543 | Kamagami et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5201395 | Takizawa et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5204811 | Bednar et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206915 | Kern et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207788 | Geib | May 1993 | A |
| 5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5231381 | Duwaer | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5237158 | Kern et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5237159 | Stephens et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5239593 | Wittner et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5251273 | Betts et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5251738 | Dabrowski | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5252811 | Henochowicz et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5261518 | Bryce | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265008 | Benton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5272641 | Ford et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5274641 | Shobatake et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5279403 | Harbaugh et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286954 | Sato et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5295196 | Raterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297030 | Vassigh et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5304813 | De Man | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308992 | Crane et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5309515 | Troung et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5317140 | Dunthorn | May 1994 | A |
| 5321238 | Kamata et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5335292 | Lovelady et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5341408 | Melcher et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342165 | Graef et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5363949 | Matsubayashi | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367577 | Gotaas | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368147 | Menke et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5371345 | LeStrange et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5371798 | McWhortor | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5373550 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5379344 | Larsson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5381019 | Sato | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383754 | Sumida et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5394969 | Harbaugh | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5399874 | Gonsalves et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402895 | Mikkelsen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5416307 | Danek et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417316 | Harbaugh | May 1995 | A |
| 5418458 | Jeffers | May 1995 | A |
| 5419424 | Harbaugh | May 1995 | A |
| 5421443 | Hatamachi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5422467 | Graef et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430664 | Cargill et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434427 | Crane et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437357 | Ota et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5438184 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442162 | Armel | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444793 | Kelland | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444794 | Uhland, Sr. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453601 | Rosen | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5459304 | Eisenmann | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465301 | Jotcham et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5465821 | Akioka | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467405 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467406 | Graves et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468941 | Sasaki | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468971 | Ebstein et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469241 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471039 | Irwin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476169 | Takarada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5481377 | Udagawa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488671 | Kern | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5491325 | Huang et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5504822 | Holt | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5506691 | Bednar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509692 | Oz | Apr 1996 | A |
| D369984 | Larsen | May 1996 | S |
| 5523575 | Machida et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530772 | Storey | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530773 | Thompson | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5537486 | Stratigos et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5544043 | Miki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544086 | Davis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545885 | Jagielinski | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5564546 | Molbak et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5586036 | Pintsov | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590196 | Moreau | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592377 | Lipkin | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5592561 | Moore | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594225 | Botvin | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600704 | Ahlberg et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5600732 | Ott et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602933 | Blackwell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602936 | Green et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607040 | Mathurin, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5615280 | Izawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616902 | Cooley et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620079 | Molbak | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633949 | Graves et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5640463 | Csulits | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5652802 | Graves et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657846 | Schwartz | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5671282 | Wolff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5678046 | Cahill et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680472 | Conant | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5687963 | Mennie | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692067 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5703344 | Bezy et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704491 | Graves | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5708810 | Kern et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719948 | Liang | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724438 | Graves | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727667 | Nye | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729623 | Omatu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5751840 | Raterman et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751842 | Riach et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754673 | Brooks et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5761089 | McInerny | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5781654 | Carney | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790693 | Graves et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790697 | Munro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799767 | Molbak | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5806650 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813510 | Rademacher | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815592 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822448 | Graves et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830054 | Petri | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832104 | Graves et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832463 | Funk | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842188 | Ramsey et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5852811 | Atkins | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5867589 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870487 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870725 | Bellinger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874717 | Kern et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875259 | Mennie et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5892211 | Davis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894937 | Schmidt | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5905810 | Jones et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909502 | Mazur | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909503 | Graves et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912982 | Munro et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917930 | Kayani et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918748 | Clark et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923413 | Laskowski | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926392 | York et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926550 | Davis | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930778 | Geer | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5936219 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5938044 | Weggesser | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940623 | Watts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940844 | Cahill et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943655 | Jacobson | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947255 | Shimada et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960103 | Graves et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966456 | Jones et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5982918 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992601 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6012565 | Mazur | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021883 | Casanova et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023684 | Pearson | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026175 | Munro et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028951 | Raterman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6036344 | Goldenberg | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038553 | Hyde, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045039 | Stinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6065672 | Haycock | May 2000 | A |
| 6068194 | Mazur | May 2000 | A |
| 6072896 | Graves et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073744 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074334 | Mennie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6076826 | Gerlier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078683 | Denison et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| D427623 | Kuwada | Jul 2000 | S |
| 6097834 | Krouse et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101266 | Laskowski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105007 | Norris | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6119946 | Teicher | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128402 | Jones et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131718 | Witschorik | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141438 | Blanchester | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6144459 | Satou | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6145738 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6181837 | Cahill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6220419 | Mennie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6237739 | Mazur et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241069 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256407 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6278795 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282523 | Tedesco et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283366 | Hills et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6311819 | Stromme et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6318537 | Jones et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6351551 | Munro et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351552 | Weaver et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6354491 | Nichols et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6363164 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363362 | Burfield | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6371303 | Klein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373965 | Liang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378683 | Mennie | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381354 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6398000 | Jenrick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6415983 | Ulvr et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430320 | Jia et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6459806 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6460705 | Hallowell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473519 | Pidhirny et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6493461 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6516078 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6539104 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540090 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6546351 | Haycock et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6550671 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6560355 | Graves et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6573983 | Laskowski | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6574377 | Cahill et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6588569 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601687 | Jenrick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6603872 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6611351 | Simonoff | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6621919 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6628816 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636624 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6637576 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6647136 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650767 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6654149 | Sheng | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654486 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6661910 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6665431 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6678401 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6678402 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6697511 | Haycock | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6705470 | Klein et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721442 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6724926 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6724927 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6731785 | Mennie et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6731786 | Jones et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748101 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6778693 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6785405 | Tuttle et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6786398 | Stinson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6798899 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6810137 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6843418 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6860375 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6863214 | Garner et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866134 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6868954 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6880692 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6883707 | Nagasaka et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6913130 | Mazur et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6913260 | Maier et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6915893 | Mennie | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6929109 | Klein et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6955253 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6957733 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6959800 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6962247 | Maier et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6980684 | Munro et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6994200 | Jenrick et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6996263 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7000828 | Jones | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006664 | Paraskevakos | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7016767 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7034324 | Voser | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036651 | Tam et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7082216 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7092560 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7103206 | Graves et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7103438 | Hallowell et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113615 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113925 | Waserstein et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7120608 | Gallagher et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124113 | Fairclough | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7146245 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149336 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7158662 | Chiles | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171032 | Jones et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7187795 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191657 | Maier et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197173 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200255 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201320 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201340 | Dietrich et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7216106 | Buchanan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7232024 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243773 | Bochonok et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248730 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248731 | Raterman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7256874 | Csulits et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7269279 | Chiles | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7312902 | Mastie et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7349566 | Jones et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7362891 | Jones et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366338 | Jones et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7391897 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7494052 | Carpenter et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7505831 | Jones et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7536046 | Raterman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542598 | Jones et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7551764 | Chiles et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7567698 | Paraskevakos | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7574377 | Carapelli | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7590274 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7591428 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7599543 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7600626 | Hallowell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7602956 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 5909503 | Graves et al. | Nov 2009 | C1 |
| 7619721 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7620231 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 5966456 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | C1 |
| 6381354 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2009 | C1 |
| 7628326 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635082 | Jones | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7647275 | Jones | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7650980 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7672499 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7686151 | Renz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7724938 | Pareskevakos | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7726457 | Maier et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7735621 | Hallowell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7753189 | Maier et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7762380 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7778456 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7779982 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7817842 | Mennie | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7849994 | Klein et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7873576 | Jones et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7881519 | Jones et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7882000 | Jones | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7885880 | Prasad et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7900829 | Folk et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7903863 | Jones et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7929749 | Jones et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7938245 | Jenrick et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949582 | Mennie et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7962411 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7974899 | Prasad et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 8011581 | Folk et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8023715 | Jones et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8041098 | Jones et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8103084 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8125624 | Jones et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8126793 | Jones | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8141772 | Folk et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8162125 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8169602 | Jones et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 20010006557 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010015311 | Mennie | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010018739 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010019624 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010035603 | Graves et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053241 | Haycock | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001393 | Jones et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020020603 | Jones et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037097 | Hoyos et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056605 | Mazur et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082993 | Hoyos et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085245 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085745 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103757 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104785 | Klein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107801 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118871 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122580 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126885 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126886 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131630 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136442 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145035 | Jones | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154804 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154805 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154806 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154807 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154808 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181805 | Loeb et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186876 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030005303 | Auslander et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030006277 | Maskatiya et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009420 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015395 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015396 | Mennie | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023557 | Moore | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059098 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030062242 | Hallowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030080032 | Heidel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081824 | Mennie et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099379 | Monk et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108233 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121752 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121753 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030128240 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030132281 | Jones et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139994 | Jones | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168308 | Maier et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174874 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182217 | Chiles | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030198373 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202690 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233317 | Judd | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040003980 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016621 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016797 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040028266 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083149 | Jones | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131230 | Paraskevakos | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145726 | Csulits et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149538 | Sakowski | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153408 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154964 | Jones | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040173432 | Jones | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182675 | Long et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040238619 | Nagasaka et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040251110 | Jenrick et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050029168 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035034 | Long et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050040225 | Csulits et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050045448 | Sugano et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047642 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060055 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060059 | Klein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060061 | Jones | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050077142 | Tam et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086271 | Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087422 | Maier et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108165 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117791 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
| 20050117792 | Graves et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
| 20050150738 | Hallowell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050151995 | Hauser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163361 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163362 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169511 | Jones | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050173221 | Maier et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183928 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207634 | Jones et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213803 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241909 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249394 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265591 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267843 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276458 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278239 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281450 | Richardson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289030 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060010071 | Jones et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054454 | Oh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078186 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106717 | Randle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060124724 | Kotovich et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136317 | Mizrah | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060182330 | Chiles | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195567 | Mody et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210137 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213979 | Geller et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274929 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070064991 | Douglas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071302 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076939 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078560 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095630 | Mennie et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102863 | Burns et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112674 | Jones et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122023 | Jenrick et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172106 | Paraskevakos | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172107 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209904 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070221470 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070237381 | Mennie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258633 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269097 | Chiles et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278064 | Hallowell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288382 | Narayanan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080006505 | Renz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033829 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037856 | Paraskevakos | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044077 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060906 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123932 | Jones et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133411 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177420 | Klein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080219543 | Csulits et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285838 | Jones et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001661 | Klein et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090013653 | Sekiguchi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090022390 | Yacoubian et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087076 | Jenrick | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090779 | Freeman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148025 | Calman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148027 | Paraskevakos | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183967 | Hamasaki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090310188 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313159 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100034454 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051687 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057617 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063916 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092065 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100108463 | Renz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100116619 | Jones | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100163366 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100236892 | Jones et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100263984 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100276485 | Jones et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303111 | Kupershmidt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110035316 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2011 | A2 |
| 20110042178 | Luecking | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110087599 | Jones | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099105 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110206267 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110215034 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110220717 | Jones et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255767 | Jenrick et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258113 | Jones et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120008131 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120008850 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120013891 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120013892 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 624 638 | Dec 2007 | CA |
| 2 684 159 | Apr 2010 | CA |
| 28 24 849 | Dec 1979 | DE |
| 0 030 413 | Jun 1981 | EP |
| 0 071 421 | Feb 1983 | EP |
| 0 077 464 | Apr 1983 | EP |
| 0 083 062 | Jul 1983 | EP |
| 0 101 115 | Feb 1984 | EP |
| 0 109 743 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0 185 200 | Jun 1986 | EP |
| 0 253 935 | Jan 1988 | EP |
| 0 314 312 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0 325 364 | Jul 1989 | EP |
| 0 338 123 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0 342 647 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0 402 627 | Dec 1990 | EP |
| 0 416 916 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0 416 960 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0 473 106 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0 548 142 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0 578 875 | Jan 1994 | EP |
| 0 583 526 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0 583 723 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0 593 209 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0 612 042 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0 613 107 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0 616 296 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0 686 292 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0 632 415 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0 633 533 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0 633 552 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0 633 553 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0 661 654 | Jul 1995 | EP |
| 0 671 696 | Sep 1995 | EP |
| 0 708 419 | Apr 1996 | EP |
| 0 718 809 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0 760 987 | Sep 1996 | EP |
| 0 824 736 | Nov 1996 | EP |
| 1 004 089 | Jun 1998 | EP |
| 1 008 096 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 1 019 869 | Oct 1998 | EP |
| 0 984 410 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1 028 359 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1 041 523 | Oct 2000 | EP |
| 1 134 704 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1 160 737 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1 437 692 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1 480 177 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 2 539 898 | Jul 1984 | FR |
| 2 722 316 | Jan 1996 | FR |
| 2 038 063 | Jul 1980 | GB |
| 2 190 996 | Dec 1987 | GB |
| 2 204 166 | Nov 1988 | GB |
| 2 272 762 | May 1994 | GB |
| 2 355 522 | Apr 2001 | GB |
| 2 464 826 | May 2010 | GB |
| 62-220843 | Sep 1987 | JP |
| 63-073497 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 02-012492 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 04-131986 | May 1992 | JP |
| 04-243497 | Aug 1992 | JP |
| 06-203248 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 07-168857 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| WO 8502148 | May 1985 | WO |
| WO 8706041 | Oct 1987 | WO |
| WO 9007165 | Jun 1990 | WO |
| WO 9111778 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO 9204692 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO 9214221 | Aug 1992 | WO |
| WO 9216931 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| WO 9217394 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| WO 9323824 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO 9406102 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO 9416412 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO 9419773 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO 9510088 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO 9519019 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO 9524691 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO 9603719 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 9610800 | Apr 1996 | WO |
| WO 9629683 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO 9636021 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 9636933 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 9705583 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO 9729459 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO 9730422 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| WO 9743734 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9745810 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 9812662 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO 9813785 | Apr 1998 | WO |
| WO 9824041 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9824052 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9824067 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9826364 | Jun 1998 | WO |
| WO 9835323 | Aug 1998 | WO |
| WO 9840839 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO 9847100 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO 9850892 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9851082 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9900776 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9909511 | Feb 1999 | WO |
| WO 9914668 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9923601 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 9941695 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 9948040 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9948042 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 9950795 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 9950796 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| WO 0024572 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 0058876 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO 0065546 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0108108 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO 0159685 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0159723 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0229735 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 02054360 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 03005312 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03028361 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03029913 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03030113 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03067532 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03107282 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004010367 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004027717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004036508 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004038631 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004068422 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005013209 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005017842 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005028348 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005029240 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005036445 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005041134 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005076229 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006039439 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006076289 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006076634 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007044570 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007120825 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007143128 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008030356 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008112132 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009081085 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO 2011109569 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Andy Pargh, “Vending Machines Dispense New Tricks It's a Breeze. Just Drop in Your Money and Create a Card, Buy a Ticket or Even Pose for a Photo on the Moon.; [3 Star Editiion].” Orlando Sentinel, Orlando, Fla., Nov. 1, 1993, p. D2, ProQuest Oct. 19, 2010, 2 pages. |
| Applied Communications Inc.: BASE24 software, “Applied Communications Announces Joint Venture,” Business Wire, 4 pages (Jan. 6, 1989). |
| AFB: AFB Currency Recognition System, 1 page (1982). |
| ASCOM: Cashflow Emerald, 2 pages, (date unknown, prior to Jan. 15, 2001). |
| ATM Cardpay Corp: “ATM Cardpay Introduces New Bill Payment Idea,” Retail Delivery Systems News, vol. 3, Iss. 1, p. 1; 2 pages (Jan. 16, 1998). |
| ATM Cardpay Corp: “The Next Generation of ATM Network Survival. ATM Cardpay Show Switches How to Win Bill Presentment/Payments Market,” EFT Report, vol. 20, Iss. 17, p. 1; 3 pages (Aug. 27, 1997). |
| AUI: Coinverter—“No More Lines . . . Self-Serve Cash-Out,” by Cassius Elston, 1995 World Games Congress/Exposition Converter, 1 page (dated prior to 1995). |
| Barton, Louis L., “Check Processing Operations”—A Hands-On Guide to Developing and Managing a State-of-the-Art Check Processing Operation, Chp. 8 and App. 2, 31 pages (1994). |
| Brandt: Mach 7 High-Speed Coin Sorter/Counter, 2 pages (1992). |
| Brandt: Model 8904 Upfeed—“High Speed 4-Denomination Currency Dispenser,” 2 pages (1989). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ Model 4060, Currency Scanner/Counter, Operator's Manual, 43 pages (Aug. 1991). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ Model 4060, Sale of JetScan Currency Scanner/Counter, 1 page (Aug. 1991). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ Model 4061, Currency Scanner/Counter—Operating Instructions, 47 pages (Apr. 20, 1993). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ Model 4061, Sale of JetScan Currency Scanner/Counter, 1 page (Apr. 20, 1993). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ Model 4062, Currency Scanner/Counter—Operating Instructions (022-7120-00), 53 pages (Nov. 28, 1994). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ Model 4062, Sale of JetScan Currency Scanner/Counter, Model 4062, 1 page (Nov. 28, 1994). |
| Cummins: JetSort® High Speed Sorter/Counter Kits I & J—Operating Instructions (Form 022-7123-00) 12 pages (1994). |
| Currency Systems International: Mr. W. Kranister in Conversation with Richard Haycock, 5 pages (estimated 1994). |
| Currency Systems International: CPS 300 Currency Processing System, 4 pages (® 1992). |
| Currency Systems International: CPS 600/900, Medium Speed Currency Sorting Family, CPS 600 and CPS 900, 4 pages (® 1994). |
| Currency Systems International: CPS 600/900, Description of CSI CPS 600 and CPS 900 devices, 1 page (date: estimated 1994). |
| De La Rue: CDS 5700 and CDS 5800 Cash Deponier System (German) and translation, 7 pages (date unknown, prior to Aug. 13, 1996). |
| EP App. No. 04 020 193.1 [claiming priority to U.S. Appl. No. 60/043,516], European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 96(2), Discussion of FR 2 722 316, 4 pages (Jul. 18, 2005). |
| Elcom International Inc: PECOS Internet Procurement Manager, “Elcom.com and Visa Announce Systems Link to Offer B2B Ecommerce Solutions,” PRNewsire, 4 pages (Nov. 29, 1999). |
| Glory: CRS-8000 Cash Redemption System, 2 pages (1996). |
| Glory: GFB-200/210/220/230 DeskTop Bank Note Counter brochure, 2 pages (estimated before Aug. 9, 1994). |
| Glory: GSA-500 Sortmaster brochure, 2 pages (estimated Jan. 14, 1994). |
| Glory: System 8000 Recycle Currency Processing Teller System, p. 5 of General Catalogue of Glory Products, 2 pages (1995). |
| Glory: UF-1D brochure and translation, 2 pages (estimated before Aug. 9, 1994). |
| ISH Electronic: ISH 12005/500 Coin Counter (with translation), 4 pages (date unknown, prior to Aug. 1996). |
| ISH Electronic: ISH 12005/501 Self-Service Unit (with translation), 4 pages (date unknown, prior to Aug. 1996). |
| J&B Software Inc.: TMS Image, “J&B Software Announces New Successes for TMS Image ™ Remittance,” PRNewswire, 2 pages (Mar. 23, 1998). |
| NGZ Geldzahlmaschinengesellschaft: NGZ 2100 Automated Coin Depository, 4 pages (date unknown, prior to Sep. 1996). |
| Perconta: Cassomat A.C.S. Automated Cash System Types I and II, 6 pages (1998). |
| Perconta: Contomat Coin Settlement Machine for Customer Self Service, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Apr. 2003). |
| Prema GmbH: Prema 405 (RE) Self Service Coin Deposit Facility, 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Apr. 2003). |
| Reis Eurosystems: CRS 6501/Crs 6510 Cash Receipt Systems for Self-Service Area, 3 pages (date unknown, prior to Apr. 2003). |
| Scan Coin: CDS 600 Cash Deposit System, 2 pages (1994). |
| Scan Coin: CDS 640 Cash Deposit System, “With Scan Coin's customer operated coin deposit system . . . ,” 2 pages (date unknown, prior to Apr. 2003). |
| ShieldSpec LLC: Currency Manager for Law Enforcement, 1 page (downloaded from www.shieldspec.com/product.html on Aug. 18, 2010). |
| ShieldSpec LLC: Presentation on Currency Manager for Law Enforcement, 10 pages (downloaded from www.shieldspec.com/documents/CurrencyManagerLawEnforcement.pdf on Aug. 18, 2010), © 2005. |
| Toshiba/(Mosler): CF-400 Series Fitness Sorter, 6 pages (estimated 1989 or earlier). |
| (Toshiba)/Mosler: CF-420 Cash Management System—Operator's Manual, 137 pages (© 1989). |
| Toshiba/Mosler: CF-420—Description of Toshiba/Mosler CF-420 Device, 1 page (date estimated 1989). |
| Toshiba/Mosler: CF-420—Revised drawings of portions of Mosler CF-420 Cash Management System (Figs. A-C) and description of the same, 4 pages (1989). |
| BARS: 5000 Currency Sorter, 6 pages (estimated prior to Aug. 13, 2003). |
| BARS: 5600 Currency Sorter, 6 pages (estimated prior to Aug. 12, 2003). |
| BARS: 6000 Single Note Inspection System, 6 pages (estimated prior to Aug. 12, 2003). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner brochure (Form 023-1789), 6 pages (May 2009). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner brochure (Form 023-1789, Rev. 1), 6 pages (Sep. 2009). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner brochure (Form 023-1789, Rev. 2), 6 pages (© 2010). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i100 shell, “The Next Generation JetScan,” (Form 023-1792), 2 pages (May 2009). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner brochure, “Ideal for Law Enforcement Applications,” (Form 023-1798), 1 page (Sep. 2009). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner mailer, “Don't Let the Evidence Get Away!,” (Form 023-1799), 2 pages (Sep. 2009). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner mailer, “Two departments just made large drug busts . . . ,” (Form 023-1820), 3 pages (Jun. 2010). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner, Operating Instructions (Form 022-7614-00), 108 pages (Oct. 2010). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series Currency Scanner brochure, “Advanced Evidence Processing for Law Enforcement,” (Form 023-1816), 6 pages (© 2010). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i100 brochure, “The Next Generation JetScan,” (Form 023-1792 Rev. 1), 2 pages (Mar. 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Series, Quick Reference (022-7631-00), 28 pages (Mar. 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i100 Currency and Check Processor website, “Revolutionizing the way you process currency and checks,” (http://ifx.cumminsallison.com/models/i100), 2 pages (Jul. 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i100 Currency and Check Solution brochure, “Never process a check or bill the same way again,” (Form 023-1858), 6 pages (© 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i100 Currency and Check Scanner brochure, “Never process a check or bill the same way again,” (Form 023-1858), 6 pages (© 2011) [downloaded Jul. 20, 2011]. |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i100 Currency Scanner brochure, “Never Photocopy a Bill Again,” (Form 023-1863), 4 pages (© 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i200 Currency Scanner brochure, “20%, 60% Fewer Rejects,” (Form 023-1859), 6 pages (© 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i400 Series, Quick Reference (022-7669-00), 20 pages (May 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX i400 Series Currency Scanner, Operating Instructions (Form 022-7666-00), 87 pages (May 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Series i400 Multi-Pocket Sorter brochure, “Smallest, fastest, most flexible multi-pocket sorter,” (Form 023-1860), 6 pages (© 2011). |
| Cummins: JetScan™ iFX Image-Management Software, Operating Instructions (022-7615-00), 58 pages (Jul. 2011). |
| De La Rue: 2700 Currency Counting Machine—User Guide, Revision 1, 53 pages (Aug. 26, 1999). |
| Document Solutions Inc.: Image Solution, DialogWeb, “Bank Gets Big Response to Image Statements”, Electronic Imaging Report, vol. 2, No. 9, 3 pp. (May 6, 1992 ). |
| Glory: GFF-8CF and GFF-8 Desktop Currency and Check Counter, 4 pages (date estimated Jan. 1994). |
| Hayosh, Thomas D, “The History of the Check and Standardization Efforts,” 5 pages, dated Sep. 26, 1995, available at http://home.comcast.net/˜hayosh/HISTMICR.pdf (visited Sep. 22, 2011). |
| Litton Integrated Automation: Proceedings, SPIE—International Society for Optical Engineering, Optical Security and Anticounterfeiting Systems (vol. 1210), “High Speed Print Quality Inspection and Verification,” by Cynthia Ott and Nagesh Chowla re Mavis, 9 pages (Jan. 1990) [GL 010713-21]. |
| NCR: NCR 5685 ATM Deposit Processing Module, DialogWeb, “NCR's ATM Captures Images at the Point of Deposit. (NCR Corp.'s New Automated Teller Machine)”, Financial Services Report, vol. 10, No. 2, p. 8(1), 2 pages (Jan. 20, 1993). |
| NCR: Intelligent Deposit Atm's, “Mixes of cash, checks no problem with Regions Bank ATMs,” article, 2 pages (Jun. 10, 2009). |
| Vector: Miscellaneous meeting notes and communications between Cummins Allison Corp. and Vector Co. Ltd regarding Vector imager, 65 pages (Apr. 1, 1996 to Jun. 15, 1997). |
| Vector Tech: Document Imaging Product Demonstration video on CD in .wmv format (Jun. 1996). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120150745 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60905965 | Mar 2007 | US | |
| 61022752 | Jan 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12044720 | Mar 2008 | US |
| Child | 13402633 | US |
